Previous Article in Journal
Multiple-Output DC-DC Converters with a Reduced Number of Active and Passive Components
Open AccessArticle

TCAD Simulation and Analysis of Selective Buried Oxide MOSFET Dynamic Power

1
Department of Engineering and Science, Higher Colleges of Technology, PO Box 25026, Abu Dhabi, UAE
2
Department of Electrical Engineering, American University of Sharjah, PO Box 26666, Sharjah, UAE
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Low Power Electron. Appl. 2019, 9(4), 29; https://doi.org/10.3390/jlpea9040029
Received: 6 August 2019 / Revised: 15 September 2019 / Accepted: 18 September 2019 / Published: 22 September 2019
Low power consumption has become one of the major requirements for most microelectronic devices and systems. Increasing power dissipation may lead to decreasing system efficiency and lifetime. The BULK metal oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) has relatively high power dissipation and low frequency response due to its internal capacitances. Although the silicon-on-insulator (SOI) MOSFET was introduced to resolve these limitations, other challenges were introduced including the kink effect in the current-voltage characteristics. The selective buried oxide (SELBOX) MOSFET was then suggested to resolve the problem of the kink effect. The authors have previously investigated and reported the characteristics of the SELBOX structure in terms of kink effect, frequency, thermal and static power characteristics. In this paper, we continue our investigation by presenting the dynamic power characteristics of the SELBOX structure and compare that with the BULK and SOI structures. The simulated fabrication of the three devices was conducted using Silvaco TCAD tools in 90 nm complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) technology. Simulation results show that the average dynamic power dissipation of the CMOS BULK, SOI and SELBOX are compatible at high frequencies with approximately 54.5 µW. At low frequencies, the SOI and SELBOX showed comparable dynamic power dissipation but with lower values than the BULK structure. The difference in power dissipation between the SELBOX and BULK is in the order of nano watts. This power difference becomes significant at the chip level. For instance, at 1 MHz, SOI and SELBOX exhibit an average dynamic power consumption of 0.0026 µW less than that of the BULK structure. This value cannot be ignored when a chip operates using thousands or millions of SOI or SELBOX MOSFETs. View Full-Text
Keywords: TCAD; CMOS; SELBOX; SOI; kink effect TCAD; CMOS; SELBOX; SOI; kink effect
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Mahmoud, R.; Madathumpadical, N.; Al-Nashash, H. TCAD Simulation and Analysis of Selective Buried Oxide MOSFET Dynamic Power. J. Low Power Electron. Appl. 2019, 9, 29.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop