Previous Article in Journal
Risk Assessment of Coal Mine Ventilation System Based on Fuzzy Polymorphic Bayes: A Case Study of H Coal Mine
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Systems Perspective on Sustainable Leadership and Innovation Capability: Building Organizational Resilience in a High-Tech Company
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Integrating Complexity and Risk Analysis for Selection of Management Approaches in Complex Projects: Application to UN Peacekeeping Missions

by
Juan-Manuel Álvarez-Espada
*,
Teresa Aguilar-Planet
and
Estela Peralta
Departamento de Ingeniería del Diseño, Escuela Politécnica Superior, Universidad de Sevilla, C/Virgen de África, 7, 41011 Sevilla, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Systems 2026, 14(1), 100; https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14010100
Submission received: 26 November 2025 / Revised: 3 January 2026 / Accepted: 14 January 2026 / Published: 16 January 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Strategic Management Towards Organisational Resilience)

Abstract

The growing complexity and dynamism of industrial and organizational projects require management approaches that can effectively adapt to uncertainty and rapidly changing operational environments. In this context, this study proposes a methodology to identify the most suitable management approach—predictive, agile, or hybrid—in complex projects. Building on the “Approach suitability tool” of the Project Management Institute’s (PMI) , the methodology integrates quantitative assessments of complexity and systemic risk. This is achieved through the analysis of stakeholder and risk networks, using metrics such as cyclomatic complexity and the coevolution parameter g, which allow for a deeper understanding of interactions and the evolution of project elements. The methodology was validated in three peacekeeping missions of the United Nations: UNMISS in South Sudan, MONUSCO in the Democratic Republic of Congo, and MINUSTAH in Haiti. The results confirm that the methodology accurately identifies the most appropriate management approach, emphasizing the effectiveness of hybrid approaches in complex and volatile environments. The proposed methodology serves as a valuable tool for optimizing project management in diverse contexts, enabling a quantitative and systematic evaluation of complexity and risk. It is adaptable and applicable to a wide range of complex projects, improving decision-making and planning in uncertain settings. Furthermore, by incorporating resilience as a cross-cutting principle, the methodology strengthens the ability of projects and their teams to maintain functionality and sustain learning even in highly volatile environments, where continuous adaptation becomes a critical success factor. In this sense, resilience emerges as the property that allows projects to absorb disruptions, reorganize, and preserve their core purpose without losing cohesion or direction.
Keywords: complexity; risk; networks; resilience; adaptation; UNMISS; MONUSCO; MINUSTAH complexity; risk; networks; resilience; adaptation; UNMISS; MONUSCO; MINUSTAH

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Álvarez-Espada, J.-M.; Aguilar-Planet, T.; Peralta, E. Integrating Complexity and Risk Analysis for Selection of Management Approaches in Complex Projects: Application to UN Peacekeeping Missions. Systems 2026, 14, 100. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14010100

AMA Style

Álvarez-Espada J-M, Aguilar-Planet T, Peralta E. Integrating Complexity and Risk Analysis for Selection of Management Approaches in Complex Projects: Application to UN Peacekeeping Missions. Systems. 2026; 14(1):100. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14010100

Chicago/Turabian Style

Álvarez-Espada, Juan-Manuel, Teresa Aguilar-Planet, and Estela Peralta. 2026. "Integrating Complexity and Risk Analysis for Selection of Management Approaches in Complex Projects: Application to UN Peacekeeping Missions" Systems 14, no. 1: 100. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14010100

APA Style

Álvarez-Espada, J.-M., Aguilar-Planet, T., & Peralta, E. (2026). Integrating Complexity and Risk Analysis for Selection of Management Approaches in Complex Projects: Application to UN Peacekeeping Missions. Systems, 14(1), 100. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14010100

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop