Next Article in Journal
Exploring the Impact of Contaminants of Emerging Concern on Fish and Invertebrates Physiology in the Mediterranean Sea
Next Article in Special Issue
Multiple Instances of Adaptive Evolution in Aquaporins of Amphibious Fishes
Previous Article in Journal
Monitoring Snake Venom-Induced Extracellular Matrix Degradation and Identifying Proteolytically Active Venom Toxins Using Fluorescently Labeled Substrates
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Application of Quantitative Metabolomics for the Taxonomic Differentiation of Birds
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bergmann’s Rule under Rocks: Testing the Influence of Latitude and Temperature on a Chiton from Mexican Marine Ecoregions

by
Raquel Hernández-P
1,2,*,
Hugo A. Benítez
3,4,
Claudia Patricia Ornelas-García
5,
Margarita Correa
3,
Manuel J. Suazo
6 and
Daniel Piñero
2,*
1
Posgrado en Ciencias Biológicas, Unidad de Posgrado, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México 04510, Mexico
2
Departamento de Ecología Evolutiva, Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México 04510, Mexico
3
Centro de Investigación de Estudios Avanzados del Maule, Instituto Milenio Biodiversidad de Ecosistemas Antárticos y Subantárticos (BASE), Universidad Católica del Maule, Talca 3466706, Chile
4
Centro de Investigación en Recursos Naturales y Sustentabilidad (CIRENYS), Universidad Bernardo O’Higgins, Avenida Viel 1497, Santiago 8370993, Chile
5
Colección Nacional de Peces, Departamento de Zoología, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México 04510, Mexico
6
Instituto de Alta Investigación, CEDENNA, Universidad de Tarapacá, Casilla 7D, Arica 1000000, Chile
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2023, 12(6), 766; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12060766
Submission received: 16 April 2023 / Revised: 19 May 2023 / Accepted: 23 May 2023 / Published: 24 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Evolution and Ecology of Phenotypes in Nature)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Chitons are a charismatic group of mollusks that live underneath rocks on shores throughout the world, where they experience variations due to environmental factors. Temperature may cause animals to grow to a larger size in colder climates, a trend originally ascribed to endothermic animals. In this work, advanced techniques were used to describe both shape and size of chitons living under different temperature regimes on Pacific shores. The results show that chitons are larger in colder zones, as occurs in endothermic vertebrates. Respiration, reproduction and/or feeding strategies may explain this trend in chitons.

Abstract

Bergmann’s rule relates the trend of increasing body size with higher latitudes, where colder climates are found. In the Mexican Pacific, three marine ecoregions are distinguishable across a latitudinal gradient. Stenoplax limaciformis is an abundant chiton species that is distributed on rocky shores in these ecoregions. Geometric morphometric analyses were performed to describe the shape and size variation of S. limaciformis between marine ecoregions that vary in sea surface temperature with latitude, thus testing Bergmann’s rule. Individuals’ body shape ranged from elongated to wide bodies. Although there was variation in chitons’ body shape and size, the was no evidence of allometry among localities. The Gulf of California is the northernmost ecoregion evaluated in this work, where larger chitons were observed and lower sea surface temperature values were registered. The results suggest that S. limaciformis follows a trend to Bergmann’s rule, such as endotherms. These mollusks do not need heat dissipation, but they do need to retain moisture. In addition, larger chitons were observed in zones with high primary productivity, suggesting that chitons do not delay their maturation due to food shortage.

1. Introduction

The North Pacific is the largest ocean basin in the world with a wide variety of complex habitat patches and a high species diversity [1]. This has been the result of diverse types of geological processes, oceanographic factors, and climate regimes [2]. The oceans have been classified into biogeographic regions based on their degree of endemism [3,4], considering pelagic systems [5], or coastal and shelf waters [6]. On the other hand, the classification of marine ecoregions has been based on oceanographic factors such as bathymetry, the existence of large water masses, and marine currents, as well as benthic and pelagic species composition [7,8]. In the Northeastern Pacific, three marine ecoregions are distinguishable: the Mexican Pacific Transition (MPT), the Gulf of California [8] and the Southern Gulf of California [9].
The MPT is a fairly complex region, with a narrow shelf that drops abruptly close to the coast. The MPT extends from the coast of Jalisco to Oaxaca in Mexico and includes the southernmost tip of Baja California Sur. This ecoregion comprises high geographical heterogeneity, with numerous hills and seamounts, including a rift system and volcanic cones. The MPT is an ecoregion of high productivity and warm sea temperature (25–28 °C in winter and over 29 °C in summer), that is seasonally affected by different currents. During the winter, it is influenced from the north by the Northern California Current and from the south by the North Equatorial Countercurrent and the Costa Rica Coastal Current [8].
The Gulf of California (GC) ecoregion reaches from northern Sonora to the southwestern coast of the Baja California Peninsula and the Gulf islands. It is a semi-enclosed subtropical sea, which has a high seasonal variation characterized by its rich biodiversity, high biological productivity, and high rates of endemism of marine life [10]. Marine records suggest that its formation could be as ancient as the western movement of the Baja California Peninsula, with an estimated age of ten million years, formed during the Late Miocene and Early Pliocene [11]. Thus, the fauna that inhabits the Gulf of California arrived there from Central and South America, the Caribbean Sea (before the formation of the Panama Isthmus), and even across the vast stretch of the Pacific Ocean from the tropical Indo-West Pacific [11,12]. Finally, the southern zone of the Gulf of California is recognized as a distinct ecoregion, based on chiton species, named the Southern Gulf of California (SGC). That zone is a complex mix of waters and oceanic conditions that marks the northern distribution limit of a large number of chiton species that are widely distributed throughout the Panamanian realm [9].
Chitons belong to the class Polyplacophora of the phylum Mollusca. They are marine organisms that live on hard substrates, mainly rocks and coral rubble. Approximately 900 chiton species have been described in the world [13,14]. These mollusks have a shell divided into eight plates, which are overlapping and surrounded by a muscular girdle. The first and eighth plates are semicircular in shape, while the intermediate plates (second to seventh) have a “butterfly” shape. The eight plates that form the chiton shell allow locomotion and provide protection (e.g., rolling into a ball-like conformation), as well as some degree of flexibility over uneven and rough surfaces [15,16]. The surface of the dorsal plates of chitons’ shells are covered with aesthetes, which are sensory structures that have photosensitive, mechanoreceptor, chemoreceptor, or secretory cells, or even ocelli [14].
The genus Stenoplax is recognized by its elongated body [17]. Within the genus, the species Stenoplax limaciformis (G. B. Sowerby I, 1832) shows a wide latitudinal distribution from the Gulf of California up to the West American Central along the shallow rocky shores. It is less abundant toward the northernmost extreme of its range, and becomes increasingly common southward [18,19]. This species has variable color and sculpting patterns on its shells. It reaches >3 cm in length, inhabits shallow waters between 1–10 m deep and lives near crustose (brown and red) and filamentous (green) algae [17,20].
Climatic conditions such as temperature, UV radiation, precipitation and weather in general can impose physiological constraints on species. These conditions are highly variable over both space and time, so it is possible to observe their effects in species with wide geographic distributions [10,21]. A widely demonstrated ecogeographical rule is the one Carl Bergmann published in 1847, which predicts increasing body sizes of animals due to decreasing environmental temperature when approaching the poles [22]. In his 1847 work, Bergmann described the trend of increasing body size with latitudinal or altitudinal distance, with species exhibiting a smaller body size in warmer environments and larger body size in colder climates, which was coined “Bergmann’s rule” [22]. This rule is considered a thermoregulatory rule, as it predicts that animals will retain heat better with a higher ratio of volume to surface area [23]. For example, 72% of birds and 65% of mammal species studied followed this rule, leading to the conclusion that it is likely a valid ecological generalization for these two groups [24]. In ectotherms, however, it has been proposed that the opposite trend—“Converse Bergmann’s Rule”—may occur [25,26]. Ectothermic organisms obtain heat by absorbing it from the environment [27], so Bergmann’s rule has found mixed support in these species.
In an analysis of freshwater fishes, ~30% (5/18) species exhibited a positive trend (i.e., followed Bergmann’s rule) [28]. Turtles (chelonians) generally follow Bergmann’s rule, while lizards and snakes (squamates) exhibit the converse relationship to this rule, decreasing in size as latitude increases [29]. Support in invertebrates is also variable. Within insects, the butterfly Auca coctei follows the converse Bergmann’s rule [30], while the orthopteran Trilophidia annulata showed a concordant pattern with Bergmann’s rule [31]. For some marine invertebrates this rule has been tested, with patterns following this rule, such as the fiddler crab [32] and marine copepods [33]. In other groups such as marine bivalves, the relationship between body size and latitude across families with functional groups is still not clear, since the main variations occur between hemispheres and coastlines [34]. In chiton species from the southeastern Pacific, it has been observed that body size increases with latitude, following Bergmann’s rule both within and among species [35].
Adaptation to local geographic factors and long-term evolutionary diversification also produce differences in shape among individuals or their body parts [36]. Geometric morphometrics is the statistical analysis of shape variation and its covariation with other variables. These analyses can be visualized as shape and interpreted anatomically through Procrustes superimposition or shape-size space, which eliminates the effects of rotation and size [37,38]. The influence of size on shape is referred to as allometry in geometric morphometrics context [39]. In this approach, the measure of centroid size—the square root of the sum of squared distances of all landmarks of an object from their center of gravity—is used [39,40]. Geometric morphometrics describe shapes in detail, which also allows appropriate visualization and interpretation of the results, which is an advantage over traditional lineal morphometric measurements [36,41].
In this work, we aimed to explore the shape and size variation of S. limaciformis along a latitudinal gradient, where sea surface temperature is variable over the year. In addition, we use geometric morphometric tools and evaluate their utility in explaining Bergmann’s Rule and exploring the evolutionary response of the effect of temperature on the body size of chitons. To this end, sea surface temperature records were analyzed along ~2800 lineal kilometers in three marine ecoregions from Mexican portion of the Pacific Ocean where S. limaciformis is distributed.

2. Materials and Methods

The sampling was carried out at fifteen localities at different latitudes (Table S1, Supplementary Material) in the three marine ecoregions: Gulf of California (GC), Southern Gulf of California (SGC), and Mexican Pacific Transition (MPT), located in the Mexican portion of the Pacific Ocean (Figure 1A). Samplings were conducted in bays or semi-enclosed zones at different times of the year (2019–2022), during low tide when possible. In each locality, three persons (each was always coordinated by the same person) examined movable rocks haphazardly for three hours, using a scraper to collect 5–15 individuals of S. limaciformis while snorkeling/diving in subtidal and intertidal zones during high tide or walking during low tide in some localities (Table S1, Supplementary Material; Figure 1B–D). All specimens were transported in seawater and subsequently anesthetized by submerging in 25 mM MgCl2 solution. Chitons were preserved in an initial solution of 50%, 70% and finally 96% ethanol, with each individual carefully arranged into a dorsoventral position. The identification of S. limaciformis for all specimens was confirmed following the diagnosis suggested by Kaas & Van Belle (1987). S. limaciformis have radial areas with irregular, often beaded, concentric ridges; each ridge connects anteriorly to one of the longitudinal ribs on the central areas. However, some individuals have ribs formed by aligned nodules, while others show irregular uninterrupted ribs [20]. So, for the geometric morphometric analyses only adult specimens were used, which had valves sculptured with pustules or nodules towards the side margins on lateral areas of intermediate valves. Chitons with weak concentric ridges and without pustules, as well as individuals that were crooked, were discarded (Figure S1 Supplementary Material). Finally, 125 individuals from three ecoregions were used for the analyses: 34 from GC, 32 from SGC and 59 from MPT.
S. limaciformis body shape was quantified using a 2D geometric morphometrics approach. Pictures of each chiton were taken in dorsal view using a CANON EOS Rebel SL1 camera and using the same metric scale. Sixteen landmarks and eighteen semilandmarks (two curves; Figure 1E) were placed using tpsDig2 v2.31 [42]. The semilandmarks were then transformed to landmarks because geomorph cannot read semilandmarks (append tps curve to landmarks option) using tpsUtil v1.78 [42]. The curves were defined again, using define.sliders (geomorph’s function), and in order to remove all mathematical influence of the shape, a generalized Procrustes analysis was performed. After this procedure, a covariance matrix of individuals was created to perform the following multivariate analyses (all analyses were performed between ecoregions). The shape space was visualized through Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and the first two components per marine ecoregion were plotted. Canonical Variate Analysis (CVA) was performed through 10,000 permutations of Mahalanobis distance from the pooled-within-ecoregions covariance matrix. The average shape of chitons per ecoregion was extracted, using the covariance matrix of the average shape variation to identify graphically the morphological variation between ecoregions. All analyses and plots were performed using R packages: geomorph, Morpho, dplyr and ggplot2 [43,44,45,46]. Their size was quantified through centroid size, which was obtained in conjunction with Procrustes superimposition (Figure 1F). The centroid size for each ecoregion was plotted in a violin graph, using ggplot2. To calculate allometry between marine ecoregions, the shape scores were regressed onto centroid size. A Procrustes ANCOVA with 1000 permutations was performed, using procD.lm (geomorph function), with Procrustes distances among specimens, in order to describe patterns of shape variation as well as covariation between shape and other variables [47].
The environmental variable analyzed was the Sea Surface Temperature (SST). Satellite-based SST data were obtained from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) server ERDDAP (Easier access to scientific data), by accessing the dataset Sea Surface Temperature, Coral Reef Watch, CoralTemp, v3.1Daily, 1985-present; dataset ID: CRW_sst_v3_1 [48,49]. Metadata were downloaded in .csv files for each degree latitude in the three marine ecoregions (Table S2, Supplementary Material). SST data were averaged to determine the warmest and coldest trimesters. Trimesters were calculated following the method for Bioclimatic Predictors [21]: (1) averaging SST per month over 36 years (1985–2020), then (2) grouping into consecutive three-month intervals (e.g., January–February–March; February–March–April), which were then averaged to obtain 12 trimester values (Figure S2, Supplementary Material). Finally, the annual mean and the difference between the warmest and coldest trimesters (seasonal range) were calculated, using the previously described trimester values. These data were analyzed and plotted using R packages: tidyverse and ggplot2 [43,50].
To evaluate Bergmann’s rule, we performed one regression of the centroid sizes of chitons (per individual) against the degree latitude of the sampling locality and a second regression of centroid size against the annual average of SST for each sampling locality. Subsequently, centroid size was regressed on the warmest, coldest and seasonal range of SST values. All variables were plotted by ecoregion using ggplot2 [43].

3. Results

The first principal component contained 47.44% of the shape variation (Figure S3, Supplementary Material); however, the three marine ecoregions were not graphically distinguished. Chitons from the MPT and SGC were more similar to each other than to chitons from the GC. Geographically, the SGC lies between the beginning of the MPT and the entrance of the gulf, which is an enclosed area (Figure 1A); thus, the SGC is influenced by the MPT and GC ecoregions. In the CVA, the body shape of S. limaciformis differed among the three marine ecoregions, and the shape of those from the GC was the most distinct (Figure 2).
The extremes of the chiton shapes were noticeable between specimens from more distant marine ecoregions; some chitons from GC had a more elongated body shape compared to the other two ecoregions, and some chitons from MPT had a wider body shape (Figure 3C). However, these differences were not present in all specimens from each ecoregion, so it is not possible to describe chitons from an ecoregion with a specific shape.
Regarding the centroid size, some chitons from the GC were larger than specimens from the SGC and MPT (Figure 3A). Additionally, the centroid size of chitons from GC had higher variance than the other ecoregions (Figure 3B). GC is the ecoregion located at the highest latitude, and chitons from this ecoregion had a larger body size than the other two ecoregions (the SGC and MPT, which were similar to each other). The ANCOVA results further confirmed differences in shape and size among the ecoregions, which evidenced significant CS differences (p = 0.001) for shape and size independently. However, the allometry analysis that showed that the interaction between “Ecoregion*Centroid Size” was not significant (p = 0.211; Table 1).
This result means that although there are differences in shape among marine ecoregions, it is not associated with centroid size, so allometry is not significant between marine ecoregions of S. limaciformis. In the present study, the samples were located between 15° to 30° north latitude. In this range, the centroid size of S. limaciformis increases at higher latitudes (Figure 4A), where SST is lower (Figure 4B). Based on trimester values, the coolest trimester reached lower temperatures in high latitudes where chitons are larger in comparison to chitons from low latitudes. This relationship is supported by regression, which showed significant p values (0.006; Figure 4C). In the opposite scenario, higher temperatures are reached in lower latitudes. The warmest trimester reached nearly 30 °C; the smallest chitons occurred at these sites, and the regression had a significant p-value (0.0026; Figure 4D). The difference between minimum and maximum SST ranged from 2.5 to 12.5 °C in the three ecoregions. Longer chitons were obtained in sites where SST had ranges of 12.5 °C throughout the years (Figure 4E).

4. Discussion

The present study is a description of the shape and size variation of S. limaciformis. The morphology of chitons is peculiar because of their dorsoventrally flattened bodies and their eight plates assembled by a girdle. Chitons are often unnoticed because they live under rocks, and differences between specimens and species are not immediately apparent. Nevertheless, in this work, the geometric morphometrics approach allowed us to identify differences in body shape among marine ecoregions. This study is the first body shape description of a chiton across a latitudinal gradient at the intraspecific level. Although our results suggest a modest level of differentiation between ecoregions, and larger differences between the extreme ecoregions, the relationship is not completely linear, since the analyses describe a multivariate space of different shapes.
S. limaciformis has shape and size variation, and each shape (elongated or broad) is apparently independent of size; this result means that allometry is not present in this chiton. However, the considered size is centroid size, which was obtained from a multivariate space. In the absence of allometry, the only size related to shape is the centroid size [38]. The size of chitons was described using centroid size, and larger chitons were observed in higher latitudes where SST is lower, so this species follows Bergmann’s rule, as has been found in endotherms [25].
Existing hypotheses of body size evolution of ectotherms propose that under cool conditions, growth is slow and they mature at a larger body size than under warm conditions [51]. This pattern has been observed under laboratory conditions, related with the fast increase in metabolic oxygen consumption with temperature, in comparison to the rate of oxygen diffusion, so at high temperatures ectotherms can reduce the sizes of some cell types. Particularly, in aquatic environments oxygen solubility decreases when the temperature increases [52].
Size variation may also be due to the environmental variance in each ecoregion, and likewise may influence chiton biology such as feeding or respiration. Chitons have a foot with which they clamp themselves to hard surfaces, which is surrounded by a mantle groove containing multiple ctenidia arranged serially along each side of the foot. The number of ctenidia and their size can differ between individuals [16], and they also increase during chiton growth [53]. Water currents pass from anterior to posterior through the mantle groove that is covered externally by a fleshy girdle [16]. Tidal exposure levels may influence the foot size of chitons; a larger foot may allow a better grip to the substrate, providing protection against predators and possible desiccation. In addition, the number of ctenidia may increase in longer individuals, allowing them to continue gas exchange even during low tide. Likewise, in some species of coastal chitons, the smaller individuals are found in crevices and hollows that are protected from waves and the sun, while larger ones may be found in exposed zones [54]. One of Bergmann’s original ideas was that body size is related to both heat production and heat dissipation. This process is due to oxygen bonding [55]. Although chitons are ectotherms and they do not maintain a constant body temperature, they should maintain constant moisture.
A relationship between larger chitons and their diet breadth has been observed in Acanthopleura echinata, a chiton that is found in the southeastern Pacific. Dietary breadth also increases with latitude, but it is not related to upwelling nor to SST [56]. In this work, larger chitons were observed at GC, where upwellings occur and lower SST have been recorded. Upwellings have high primary productivity [57]. Additionally, the intensity of metabolism increases with body size, increasing the requirement for the amount and constancy of food [58]. A high-productivity environment, such as that of the GC, means that chitons and other herbivores have constant access to food. Although factors such as moisture content or primary production are to a high degree correlated with temperature, it is not always possible to determine their individual contribution to Bergmann’s clines, which is not universally supported in ectotherms [58].
Another factor that may contribute to Bergmann’s rule is reproduction [58]. Along with species distribution, the organisms in a warmer climate (where resources are constant along seasons) spend less time growing, reaching the reproduction stage earlier. Meanwhile, organisms in colder climates delay their reproduction because they allocate resources to growth [58,59]. In Chiton articulatus it has been observed that during the reproductive stage, somatic indices diminish considerably during gonad development, especially when the SST reaches maximum values [60]. In the current study, we found larger chitons at lower SST. Although the reproductive season of S. limaciformis is unknown, there are relatively broad seasonal changes in SST, such that it could potentially reproduce under a range of temperature conditions. On the other hand, slower growth increases the risk of death for organisms before they reach the maturity stages [61]. However, it is known that Acanthopleura and Chiton from the Caribbean Sea reach sexual maturity by the end of the first year, resulting in overlapping generations of reproductive adults (i.e., first-year and older adults reproduce simultaneously) [62].
Geomorphological features of sites can be possible causes of latitudinal variation of size for these mollusks. For example, the Gulf of California is the most recent ecoregion analyzed in this work, which may imply that its populations have a higher size variation in comparison with other populations that have been connected for a longer time. Secondly, the Northern Gulf of California has a very shallow shelf (depth < 30 m) and a slight slope, resulting in high tide amplitudes [8,57], such that benthic zones are exposed during low tide. Although chitons remain in tide pools in that time, larger chitons with more ctenidia could be better at withstanding the tidal change. On the other hand, MPT has a steeply sloping shelf [8]. Thus, chitons living in these zones remain submerged even during low tide, and they can breathe and maintain their moisture constantly, regardless of their number of ctenidia or body size. In addition, GC is a seasonally dynamic sea, dominated by the Pacific Ocean. During the summer the currents are caused by coastal trapped waves, and during winter they are wind-driven. These changes affect local processes, such as the altering of thermohaline characteristics of the upper layer waters, which are important at a shorter time scale [57]. Seasonal changes in temperature throughout the year influence the growth of organisms, while increasing temperatures can cause a decrease in the sizes of emerging adults [63]. Finally, at the entrance of the Gulf of California, which corresponds to the SGC ecoregion, latitudinal displacements of the equatorial current system occur, which determine how far south the California Current (cold water) will flow and how far north the Costa Rican Coastal Current (warm water) will flow [57]. These temperature variations coincide with what was observed in this work—larger chitons in higher latitudes (GC ecoregion) where the lower temperatures and broader range of SST were obtained, and smaller individuals in lower latitudes at higher temperatures.
Ecological and environmental variables change with latitude, while some ecological characteristics such as feeding or substrate may influence body size [64,65]. We can therefore expect that ecologically similar families exhibit similar trends. However, families of bivalves with similar trends are ecologically diverse, so the variation between the observed regions in these mollusks has been driven by diverse processes, past and present [34]. Based on the results of this work, the relationship between latitude and body size of each chiton species cannot be predicted even if they have the same ecological niche.
One idea of Bergmann’s rule is that “if we could find two species of animals (endothermic) which would only differ from each other with respect to size, the geographical distribution of the two species would have to be determined by their size” [22]. S. limaciformis is considered in a group of sibling species with S. purpurascens and S. floridana, which are distributed in the Caribbean Sea. Stenoplax limaciformis, S. purpurascens, and S. floridiana are reproductively isolated from each other, and although they are superficially nearly morphologically identical, they do show small but consistent morphological differences [66]. If the large size of S. limaciformis from high latitudes is due to temperature, one would expect S. purpurascens and S. floridana from the (warmer) Caribbean Sea to have smaller sizes.

5. Conclusions

Variations in chiton body shape were observed between marine ecoregions, with larger chitons found at higher latitudes where SST is cooler. Thus, S. limaciformis follows Bergmann’s rule. Geometric morphometrics is an adequate tool to describe chiton shape, which is variable but does not relate to size (i.e., there is no allometry). A relationship between body size and temperature was observed. However, it is paramount to include data on other oceanographic factors such as dissolved oxygen or chlorophyll a in order to better describe this and other chiton species. Since chitons adhere to the substrate, the size and shape of their bodies affect individuals’ access to resources. Thus, this work, describing variation in body size and shape across populations lays the foundations for future work on physiology, genomics or other fields in chitons or even other invertebrates.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biology12060766/s1, Figure S1. Selected and discarded individuals; Figure S2. SST per trimester along the latitude; Figure S3. Principal component analysis per marine ecoregion; Table S1. Sampling site information. Table S2. Coordinates of satellite data of surface sea temperature.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.H.-P., H.A.B., C.P.O.-G., M.C. and D.P.; methodology, R.H.-P., H.A.B., C.P.O.-G., M.C., M.J.S. and D.P.; validation, H.A.B. and C.P.O.-G.; formal analysis, R.H.-P., H.A.B., C.P.O.-G. and D.P.; investigation, R.H.-P., H.A.B., C.P.O.-G., M.C. and D.P.; resources, D.P.; data curation, R.H.-P., H.A.B. and C.P.O.-G.; writing—original draft preparation, R.H.-P. and D.P.; writing—review and editing, R.H.-P., H.A.B., C.P.O.-G., M.C., M.J.S. and D.P.; visualization, R.H.-P., H.A.B., C.P.O.-G., M.C., M.J.S. and D.P.; supervision, C.P.O.-G. and D.P.; project administration, R.H.-P., C.P.O.-G. and D.P.; funding acquisition, D.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Assigned internal budget (Presupuesto operativo) of IE, UNAM to D.P. and PAEP, UNAM 2020, 2022.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Collection, anesthesia, and preservation of specimens was performed under specifications for the scientific collecting of wild fauna species, Mexican Official Standard (Norma Oficial Mexicana, NOM-126-ECOL-2000) as well as the ethical recommendations for animal welfare as established under NOM-033-ZOO-1995 for the euthanizing and humane killing of invertebrates.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

We will upload the data to Dryad.

Acknowledgments

Posgrado en Ciencias Biológicas from Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM) and the scholarship (Number: 750384) provided by Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT). Field support: Atzimba Toledano-Carrasco, Azalea Guerra-García, Erik Rodríguez, Nancy Gálvez-Reyes, Omar Ojeda, Guadalupe Martínez-Morales, Adonis Mingüer and Brian Urbano. Laboratory support: Nancy Gálvez-Reyes and Martha Reguero. Data Analysis support: Luis Osorio-Olvera, Rodrigo Ordenes-Claveria, Laboratorio de Ecología y Morfometría Evolutiva de la Universidad Católica del Maule, Chile.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Therriault, T.; Park, C.; Rice, J. North Pacific Ocean. In The First Global Integrated Marine Assessment: World Ocean Assessment I; Inniss, L., Simcock, A., United Nations, Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2017; p. 973. ISBN 9781108186148. [Google Scholar]
  2. Macpherson, E.; Richer, B.; Forges, D.; Schnabel, K.; Samadi, S.; Boisselier, M.; Garcia-rubies, A. Biogeography of the deep-sea galatheid squat lobsters of the Pacific Ocean. Deep Res. Part I Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 2010, 57, 228–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Briggs, J.C. Marine Zoogeography; McGraw-Hill Book Co.: New York, NY, USA, 1974. [Google Scholar]
  4. Briggs, J.C. Global Biogeography; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  5. Longhurst, A.R. Ecological Geography of the Sea; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  6. Watson, R.; Pauly, D.; Christensen, V.; Froese, R.; Longhurst, A.; Platt, T.; Sathyendranath, S.; Sherman, K.; O’Reilly, J.; Celone, P. Mapping fisheries onto marine ecosystems: A consensus approach for regional, oceanic and global integrations. In Large Marine Ecosystems of the World; Hempel, G., Sherman, K., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2003; Volume 1, pp. 375–395. [Google Scholar]
  7. Spalding, M.D.; Fox, H.E.; Allen, G.R.; Davidson, N.; Ferdaña, Z.A.; Finlayson, M.; Halpern, B.S.; Jorge, M.A.; Lombana, A.; Lourie, S.A.; et al. Marine ecoregions of the world: A bioregionalization of coastal and shelf areas. Bioscience 2007, 57, 573–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wilkinson, T.; Wiken, E.; Creel, J.; Hourigan, T.; Agardy, T.; Herrmann, H.; Janishevski, L.; Madden, C.; Morgan, L.; Padilla, M. Marine Ecoregions of North America; Commission for Environmental Cooperation: Montreal, QC, Canada, 2009; Volume 57, ISBN 9782923358413. [Google Scholar]
  9. Reyes-Gómez, A. Chitons, The Polyplacophora from the Mexican Pacific; The Festivus: Encinitas, CA, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  10. Páez-Osuna, F.; Sanchez-Cabeza, J.A.; Ruiz-Fernández, A.C.; Alonso-Rodríguez, R.; Piñón-Gimate, A.; Cardoso-Mohedano, J.G.; Flores-Verdugo, F.J.; Carballo, J.L.; Cisneros-Mata, M.A.; Álvarez-Borrego, S. Environmental status of the Gulf of California: A review of responses to climate change and climate variability. Earth Sci. Rev. 2016, 162, 253–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Keigwin, L.D. Pliocene closing of the Isthmus of Panama, based on biostratigraphic evidence from nearby Pacific Ocean and Caribbean Sea cores. Geology 1978, 6, 630–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Leigh, E.G.; O’Dea, A.; Vermeij, G.J. Historical biogeography of the isthmus of panama. Biol. Rev. 2014, 89, 148–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Eernisse, D.J. Chitons. In Encyclopedia of Tidepools and Rocky Shores; Denny, M., Gaines, S., Eds.; University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, USA, 2007; pp. 127–133. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ponder, W.F.; Lindberg, D.R.; Ponder, J.M. Biology and Evolution of the Mollusca, Volume Two; Taylor & Francis Group: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2020; ISBN 9780815361848. [Google Scholar]
  15. Connors, M.J.; Ehrlich, H.; Hog, M.; Godeffroy, C.; Araya, S.; Kallai, I.; Gazit, D.; Boyce, M.; Ortiz, C. Three-dimensional structure of the shell plate assembly of the chiton Tonicella marmorea and its biomechanical consequences. J. Struct. Biol. 2012, 177, 314–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ponder, W.F.; Lindberg, D.R.; Ponder, J.M. Biology and Evolution of the Mollusca, Volume One; Taylor & Francis Group: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2019; ISBN 9781787284395. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kaas, P.; Van Belle, R.A. Monograph of Living Chitons (Mollusca: Polyplacophora) Volume 3; Brill: New York, NY, USA, 1987; ISBN 90 04 08614 5. [Google Scholar]
  18. García-Ríos, C.I.; Álvarez-Ruiz, M. Comunidades de quitones (Mollusca: Polyplacophora) de la Bahía de La Paz, Baja California Sur, México. Rev. Biol. Trop. 2007, 55, 177–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Flores-Garza, R.; Galeana-Rebolledo, L.; Ibáñez, S.G.; Torreblanca-Ramírez, C. Polyplacophora species richness, composition and distribution of its community associated with the intertidal rocky substrate in the marine priority region No. 32 in Guerrero, Mexico. Open J. Ecol. 2012, 2, 192–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Reyes-Gómez, A.; Flores-Garza, R.; Galeana-Rebolledo, L.; Hernández-Vera, G.; Galván-Villa, C.M.; Torreblanca-Ramírez, C.; Flores-Rodríguez, P.; García-Ibañez, S.; Ríos-Jara, E. Intertidal chitons (Mollusca: Polyplacophora) from the rocky coastline of Guerrero, México, with the description of a new species. Zootaxa 2022, 5155, 451–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. O’Donnell, M.S.; Ignizio, D.A. Bioclimatic Predictors for Supporting Ecological Applications in the Conterminous United States; U.S. Geological Survey: Reston, VA, USA, 2012; p. 10p. [Google Scholar]
  22. Blackburn, T.M.; Gaston, K.J.; Loder, N. Geographic gradients in body size: A clarification of Bergmann’s rule. Divers. Distrib. 1999, 5, 165–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Shelomi, M.; Zeuss, D. Bergmann’s and Allen’s Rules in Native European and Mediterranean Phasmatodea. Front. Ecol. EVolume 2017, 5, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Meiri, S.; Dayan, T. On the validity of Bergmann’s rule. J. Biogeogr. 2003, 30, 331–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Blanckenhorn, W.U.; Demont, M. Bergmann and converse bergmann latitudinal clines in arthropods: Two ends of a continuum? Integr. Comp. Biol. 2004, 44, 413–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Shelomi, M. Where are we now? Bergmann’s rule Sensu Lato in insects. Am. Nat. 2012, 180, 511–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ray, C. The application of Bergmann’s and Allen’s rules to the poikilotherms. J. Morphol. 1960, 106, 85–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Belk, M.C.; Houston, D.D. Bergmann’s rule in ectotherms: A test using freshwater fishes. Am. Nat. 2002, 160, 803–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ashton, K.G.; Feldman, C.R. Bergmann’s rule in nonavian reptiles: Turtles follow it, lizards and snakes reverse it. Evolution 2003, 57, 1151–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sanzana, M.J.; Parra, L.E.; Sepúlveda-Zúñiga, E.; Benítez, H.A. Latitudinal gradient effect on the wing geometry of Auca coctei (Guérin) (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae). Rev. Bras. Entomol. 2013, 57, 411–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bai, Y.; Dong, J.J.; Guan, D.L.; Xie, J.Y.; Xu, S.Q. Geographic variation in wing size and shape of the grasshopper Trilophidia annulata (Orthoptera: Oedipodidae): Morphological trait variations follow an ecogeographical rule. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 32680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Johnson, D.S.; Crowley, C.; Longmire, K.; Nelson, J.; Williams, B.; Wittyngham, S. The fiddler crab, Minuca pugnax, follows Bergmann’s rule. Ecol. EVolume 2019, 9, 14489–14497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Campbell, M.D.; Schoeman, D.S.; Venables, W.; Abu-Alhaija, R.; Batten, S.D.; Chiba, S.; Coman, F.; Davies, C.H.; Edwards, M.; Eriksen, R.S.; et al. Testing Bergmann’s rule in marine copepods. Ecography 2021, 44, 1283–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Berke, S.K.; Jablonski, D.; Krug, A.Z.; Roy, K.; Tomasovych, A. Beyond Bergmann’s rule: Size-latitude relationships in marine Bivalvia world-wide. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2013, 22, 173–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ibáñez, C.M.; Carter, M.J.; Aguilera, M.A.; Pardo-Gandarillas, M.C.; Rezende, E.L. Body size variation in polyplacophoran molluscs: Geographical clines and community structure along the south-eastern Pacific. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2021, 30, 1781–1795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zelditch, M.; Swiderski, D.; Sheets, H. Geometric Morphometrics for Biologists: A Primer, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2012; ISBN 9780123869036. [Google Scholar]
  37. Klingenberg, C.P.; Gidaszewski, N.A. Testing and quantifying phylogenetic signals and homoplasy in morphometric data. Syst. Biol. 2010, 59, 245–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Bookstein, F.L. Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  39. Klingenberg, C.P. Size, shape, and form: Concepts of allometry in geometric morphometrics. Dev. Genes EVolume 2016, 226, 113–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Bookstein, F.L. Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: Localizing group differences in outline shape. Med. Image Anal. 1996, 1, 225–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Benítez, H.A.; Püschel, T.A. Modelando la varianza de la forma: Morfometría geométrica aplicaciones en biología evolutiva. Int. J. Morphol. 2014, 32, 998–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rohlf, F.J. The tps series of software. Hystrix Ital. J. Mammal. 2015, 26, 9–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wickham, H.; Chang, W.; Henry, L.; Pedersen, T.L.; Takahashi, K.; Wilke, C.; Woo, K.; Yutani, H. ggplot2: Create Elegant Data Visualisations Using the Grammar of Graphics; Springer-Verlag New York, USA, CRAN.R-project. 2016. Available online: https://github.com/tidyverse/ggplot2 (accessed on 15 April 2023).
  44. Schlager, S. Morpho and Rvcg—Shape Analysis in R. In Statistical Shape and Deformation Analysis; Zheng, G., Li, S., Szekely, G., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2017; pp. 217–256. ISBN 9780128104934. [Google Scholar]
  45. Adams, D.; Collyer, M.; Kaliontzopoulou, A.; Baken, E. Geomorph, Geometric Morphometric Analyses of 2D/3D Landmark Data. Version: 4.0.1; CRAN.R-project. 2021. Available online: https://github.com/geomorphR/geomorph (accessed on 15 April 2023).
  46. Wickham, H.; François, R.; Henry, L.; Müller, K.; Vaughan, D. dplyr: A Grammar of Data Manipulation; CRAN.R-project. 2023. Available online: https://github.com/tidyverse/dplyr (accessed on 15 April 2023).
  47. Anderson, M.J. A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Aust. Ecol. 2006, 26, 32–46. [Google Scholar]
  48. Donlon, C.J.; Martin, M.; Stark, J.; Roberts-Jones, J.; Fiedler, E.; Wimmer, W. The Operational Sea Surface Temperature and Sea Ice Analysis (OSTIA) system. Remote Sens. Environ. 2012, 116, 140–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Maturi, E.; Harris, A.; Mittaz, J.; Sapper, J.; Wick, G.; Zhu, X.; Dash, P.; Koner, P. A new high-resolution sea surface temperature blended analysis. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 2017, 98, 1015–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wickham, H.; Averick, M.; Bryan, J.; Chang, W.; McGowan, L.; François, R.; Grolemund, G.; Hayes, A.; Henry, L.; Hester, J.; et al. Welcome to the tidyverse. J. Open Source Softw. 2019, 4, 1686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Atkinson, D.; Sibly, R.M. Why are organisms usually bigger in colder environments? Making sense of a life history puzzle. Trends Ecol. EVolume 1997, 12, 235–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Rollinson, N.; Rowe, L. Temperature-dependent oxygen limitation and the rise of Bergmann’s rule in species with aquatic respiration. Evolution 2018, 72, 977–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. García-Ríos, C.I. Los Quitones de Puerto Rico; Isla Negra Editores: San Juan, Puerto Rico, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  54. Liuzzi, M.G. Polyplacophora. In Los Invertebrados Marinos; Calcagno, J.A., Ed.; Fundación de Historia Natural Félix de Azara: Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2014; pp. 119–131. [Google Scholar]
  55. Salewski, V.; Watt, C. Bergmann’s rule: A biophysiological rule examined in birds. Oikos 2017, 126, 161–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Camus, P.A.; Navarrete, A.H.; Sanhueza, Á.G.; Felipe Opazo, L. Trophic ecology of the chiton Acanthopleura echinata on Chilean rocky shores. Rev. Chil. Hist. Nat. 2012, 85, 123–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lavín, M.F.; Marinone, S.G. An Overview of the Physical Oceanography of. In Nonlinear Processes in Geophysical Fluid Dynamics: A Tribute to the Scientific Work of Pedro Ripa; Velasco Fuentes, O.U., Sheinbaum, J., Ochoa, J., Eds.; Springer: Ensenada, México, 2003; pp. 173–204. [Google Scholar]
  58. Vinarski, M.V. On the applicability of Bergmann’s rule to ectotherms: The state of the art. Biol. Bull. Rev. 2014, 4, 232–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Angilletta, M.J.; Dunham, A.E. The Temperature-Size Rule in Ectotherms: Simple Evolutionary Explanations May Not Be General. Am. Nat. 2003, 162, 332–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Avila-Poveda, O.H. Annual change in morphometry and in somatic and reproductive indices of Chiton articulatus adults (Polyplacophora: Chitonidae) from Oaxaca, Mexican Pacific. Am. Malacol. Bull. 2013, 31, 65–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Angilletta, M.J. Temperature and the Life History. In Thermal Adaptation: A Theoretical and Empirical Synthesis; Angilletta, M.J., Ed.; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2009; pp. 157–180. ISBN 9780198570875. [Google Scholar]
  62. Glynn, P.W. On the ecology of the Caribbean chitons Acanthopleura granulata Gmelin and Chiton tuberculatus Linné: Density, mortality, feeding, reproduction, and growth. Smithson. Contrib. Zool. 1970, 66, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Atkinson, D. Temperature and Organism Size—A Biological Law for Ectotherms? Adv. Ecol. Res. 1994, 25, 1–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Stillwell, R.C. Are latitudinal clines in body size adaptive? Oikos 2010, 119, 1387–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Arnett, A.E.; Gotelli, N.J. Bergmann’s rule in larval ant lions: Testing the starvation resistance hypothesis. Ecol. Entomol. 2003, 28, 645–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Reyes-Gómez, A.; Barrientos-Lujan, N.; Medina-Bautista, J.; Ramírez-Luna, S. Chitons from the coralline area of Oaxaca, Mexico (Polyplacophora). Boll. Malacol. 2010, 46, 110–124. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. (A) Geographic location of sites where S. limaciformis specimens were obtained. Dotted lines indicate separation between ecoregions; (B) S. limaciformis adhered to a rock; (C) Mazatlán, a site from the Southern Gulf of California, during low tide; (D) Huatulco, a site from the Mexican Pacific Transitional that always remains submerged; (E) Location of landmarks and semilandmarks (curves) on S. limaciformis; and (F) Procrustes superimposition of S. limaciformis.
Figure 1. (A) Geographic location of sites where S. limaciformis specimens were obtained. Dotted lines indicate separation between ecoregions; (B) S. limaciformis adhered to a rock; (C) Mazatlán, a site from the Southern Gulf of California, during low tide; (D) Huatulco, a site from the Mexican Pacific Transitional that always remains submerged; (E) Location of landmarks and semilandmarks (curves) on S. limaciformis; and (F) Procrustes superimposition of S. limaciformis.
Biology 12 00766 g001
Figure 2. Shape description. Canonical variate analysis of S. limaciformis. Each color represents a marine ecoregion. Mean shape is displayed in the same color as the corresponding marine ecoregion.
Figure 2. Shape description. Canonical variate analysis of S. limaciformis. Each color represents a marine ecoregion. Mean shape is displayed in the same color as the corresponding marine ecoregion.
Biology 12 00766 g002
Figure 3. Allometry. (A) Shape variation accumulated in principal component 1 scores due to centroid size of S. limaciformis. (B) Centroid size variation in each marine ecoregion. (C) Chiton shape based on extreme values of principal component 1 scores, from Gulf of California and Mexican Pacific Transition.
Figure 3. Allometry. (A) Shape variation accumulated in principal component 1 scores due to centroid size of S. limaciformis. (B) Centroid size variation in each marine ecoregion. (C) Chiton shape based on extreme values of principal component 1 scores, from Gulf of California and Mexican Pacific Transition.
Biology 12 00766 g003
Figure 4. Bergmann’s rule. (A) Regression of centroid size on latitude per individual; (B) regression of centroid size on sea surface temperature per individual; (C) regression of centroid size on minimum (trimester) sea surface temperature per individual; (D) regression of centroid size on maximum (trimester) sea surface temperature per individual; and (E) regression of centroid size on the range of sea surface temperature per individual.
Figure 4. Bergmann’s rule. (A) Regression of centroid size on latitude per individual; (B) regression of centroid size on sea surface temperature per individual; (C) regression of centroid size on minimum (trimester) sea surface temperature per individual; (D) regression of centroid size on maximum (trimester) sea surface temperature per individual; and (E) regression of centroid size on the range of sea surface temperature per individual.
Biology 12 00766 g004
Table 1. Procrustes ANCOVA model of shape among marine ecoregions.
Table 1. Procrustes ANCOVA model of shape among marine ecoregions.
SSMSFp
Centroid size0.00900.00920.040.001 **
Ecoregion0.00430.00214.840.001 **
Ecoregion * Centroid Size0.00120.00061.330.211
SS—Sum of squares, MS—Mean sum of squares, ** significant p values.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hernández-P, R.; Benítez, H.A.; Ornelas-García, C.P.; Correa, M.; Suazo, M.J.; Piñero, D. Bergmann’s Rule under Rocks: Testing the Influence of Latitude and Temperature on a Chiton from Mexican Marine Ecoregions. Biology 2023, 12, 766. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12060766

AMA Style

Hernández-P R, Benítez HA, Ornelas-García CP, Correa M, Suazo MJ, Piñero D. Bergmann’s Rule under Rocks: Testing the Influence of Latitude and Temperature on a Chiton from Mexican Marine Ecoregions. Biology. 2023; 12(6):766. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12060766

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hernández-P, Raquel, Hugo A. Benítez, Claudia Patricia Ornelas-García, Margarita Correa, Manuel J. Suazo, and Daniel Piñero. 2023. "Bergmann’s Rule under Rocks: Testing the Influence of Latitude and Temperature on a Chiton from Mexican Marine Ecoregions" Biology 12, no. 6: 766. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12060766

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop