Next Article in Journal
Zingiber officinale Roscoe Rhizome Extract Exerts Senomorphic and Anti-Inflammatory Activities on Human Endothelial Cells
Next Article in Special Issue
Should the Identification Guidelines for Siamese Crocodiles Be Revised? Differing Post-Occipital Scute Scale Numbers Show Phenotypic Variation Does Not Result from Hybridization with Saltwater Crocodiles
Previous Article in Journal
C-Type Natriuretic Peptide Acts as a Microorganism-Activated Regulator of the Skin Commensals Staphylococcus epidermidis and Cutibacterium acnes in Dual-Species Biofilms
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comparative Mitogenome Analyses Uncover Mitogenome Features and Phylogenetic Implications of the Parrotfishes (Perciformes: Scaridae)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biology
Volume 12
Issue 3
10.3390/biology12030437
biology-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genetic Diversity and Connectivity of Ocypode ceratophthalmus in the East and South China Seas and Its Implications for Conservation

by
Feng Zhao
,
Yue Liu
,
Zihan Wang
,
Jiaying Lu
,
Ling Cao
and
Cong Zeng
*
School of Oceanography, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2023, 12(3), 437; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12030437
Submission received: 17 January 2023 / Revised: 7 March 2023 / Accepted: 10 March 2023 / Published: 12 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Integrating Science into Aquatic Conservation)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

This study investigated the genetic diversity and connectivity of 15 Ocypode ceratophthalmus populations in the East and South China Seas based on two genetic markers. The results showed that O. ceratophthalmus had a high genetic diversity among all collected populations, and an insignificant population structure was observed by a hierarchical analysis of molecular variance and fixation index. Additionally, Migrate-n revealed high historical gene flow and migration rates among populations. The results of this study could inform the construction and management of marine protected areas in the East and South China Seas.

Abstract

The East and South China Seas are rich in marine resources, but they are also under great pressure from climate change and human activities. Maintaining diversity and connectivity between communities is thought to be effective in mitigating these pressures. To assess the diversity and connectivity among the populations of Ocypode ceratophthalmus in the East and South China Seas, 15 populations from or near 15 marine protected areas in the two seas were studied using COI and D-Loop as genetic markers. The results showed that O. ceratophthalmus populations had high diversity, and the results of a hierarchical analysis of molecular variance and fixation index found that there were no significant genetic structures among these populations. High historical gene flow and high migration rates were further observed among populations by Migrate-n. Furthermore, the COI sequences further showed the asymmetric migration rate with a higher migration rate from south to north than from north to south. This information could provide recommendations for the management of marine protected areas in the East and South China Seas.

1. Introduction

The East and South China Seas are important areas for the utilization of marine resources and marine conservation. Currently, 12,933 tropical and subtropical species in the East China Sea (ECS) have been recorded, of which half (48%) were endemic [1], and the ECS was also an important fishery for the world, contributing about 6 million tons of catches annually [2]. The South China Sea (SCS), adjacent to the ECS, is regarded as the hotspot of tropical biodiversity in shallow seas, with 450 species of coral (about 7% of the world’s total coral reef areas), 2 million hectares of mangrove (12% of the world’s total mangrove areas), 1027 species of fish, 91 species of shrimp and 73 species of cephalopods [3]. Furthermore, the SCS provides 6 billion tons of catch annually, accounting for 10% of the world’s total catch [3]. Nevertheless, with the rapid economic development in the East and South China Seas, the regions were also facing threats, such as overfishing, biodiversity decline and habitat degradation, which urgently need to be strengthened for conservation [3]. The marine protected area (MPA) was considered the core initiative of marine biodiversity conservation [4], and MPAs were established to protect the ECS and SCS 20 years ago by the Chinese government. So far, 22 national-level MPAs and more than 50 local-level MPAs have been established in the ECS, and more than 20 national-level MPAs have been set up in the SCS [5]. Most of these protected areas were usually designated by local governments, and these bottom-up designations may lack systematic planning [6].
Protecting biodiversity as a whole required not only the design of protected areas with reasonable functions, but also the consideration of species migration among different habitats on a larger scale, such as the establishment of several protected areas with the same functions to form an MPA network. Previous studies have also revealed that the MPA network could effectively prevent or mitigate the negative impacts of biodiversity [7], which required connectivity to promote population persistence in marine ecosystems [8]. The Convention on Biological Diversity has recognized connectivity as a fundamental principle in the planning of the MPA network. Additionally, it was requisite to determine the boundaries of ecosystems based on connectivity in the ecosystem-based marine reserve management system [9]. Therefore, it is important to understand the connectivity in these two seas and that connectivity barriers may not be present in these two seas.
The ECS belongs to the East China Sea Ecoregion in the Warm Temperate Northern Pacific Marine Biogeographic province, and the SCS belongs to the Gulf of Tonkin Ecoregion, Southern China Ecoregion and South China Sea Oceanic Islands Ecoregion in the South China Sea Marine Biogeographic province [10]. Whether the transition in different ecoregions will have an impact on population connectivity remains to be researched, and this question relates to whether the protected areas between the two seas are constructed as a network of protected areas or separately. At present, studies on this issue do not have the same results. On the one hand, high connectivity reports were increasing in coastal species, which span different ecoregions. For example, Atrina pectinate [11], Nibea albiflora [12], Octopus ovulum [13], Parasesarma affinis [14], Periophthalmus modestus [15], Siphonaria japonica [16] and Thamnaconus hypargyreus [17] had high connectivity among populations in both ECS and SCS. On the other hand, it has been reported that there was limited connectivity between populations in the ECS and populations in the SCS, such as Chelon haematocheilus [18], Eleutheronema tetradactylum [19], Epinephelus akaara [20], Pagrus major [21] and Scomber japonicus [22]. These inconsistent findings, which could be caused by limited spatial coverage and insufficient sampling (usually less than 10 populations, see summary in Table S1), require further research on the connectivity of the two seas.
Horn-eyed ghost crab (Ocypode ceratophthalmus), a species widely distributed in the East and South China Seas, has a planktonic larval stage and a settled adult stage like most marine invertebrates. Furthermore, O. ceratophthalmus is expected to suffer less human disturbance due to its low economic value, and it is therefore considered to be better to reflect the diversity and connectivity patterns among protected areas [23]. Although the previous study did not find any genetic differences in the SCS population, it was tested in only three populations and with a limited sample [24]. To reveal its population structures and provide suggestions for the marine protection in the East and South China Seas, two molecular markers, COI and D-Loop, were employed in this study to assess the genetic connectivity among horn-eyed ghost crab populations in or near marine protected areas in the two seas. The results from this study were expected to inform the construction and management of marine protected areas in China.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection and DNA Extraction

From September 2021 to April 2022, 8 populations of the horn-eyed ghost crab were collected from sandy beach in 8 marine protected areas. In addition, because not every MPA has the ghost crab habitat, 7 populations were collected in the adjoining sandy beach of 7 marine protected areas (Figure 1; Table 1). The morphological details of each group are presented in Table S2.
The obtained samples were morphologically identified according to the previous study [25], samples were transported back to the laboratory, measurements of carapace width, carapace length, abdomen width, abdomen length, weight and gender were conducted [26]. Then, samples were stored in 95% ethanol at −20 °C until DNA extraction. About 20 mg of muscle tissue from the ambulatory leg was obtained to extract the total DNA by using MolPure® Cell/Tissue DNA Kit (Yeason, Shanghai, Chian), and the DNA was stored at −20 °C and used as a template in the PCR reactions. PCR was implemented to amplify COI and D-Loop using the following primers, LCO1490 (5′-GGTCAACAAATCATAAAGATATTGG-3′) and HCO2198 (5′-TAAACTTCAGGGTGACCAAAAAATCA-3′) for COI, 13,323F (5′-GCGAATGCTGGCACAAACAT-3′) and 14,378R (5′-AGGGAGTGGTGCAATTCCAT-3′) for D-loop. The PCR amplification reaction included 25 μL 2× Hieff® PCR Master Mix, 2 μL of upstream and downstream primers (10 μM), about 55 ng of template DNA, and double-distilled water was added to the total volume of 50 μL. Then, the PCR thermal cycling program was set as follows: denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation for 94 °C 30 s, annealing at 55 °C for 30 s, elongation at 72 °C for 1 min; and the final extension step for 10 min at 72 °C. All PCR products were detected by 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis. Finally, the PCR products were purified and sequenced by Tsingke Biotech Company (Shanghai, China).
Biology 12 00437 g001 550
Figure 1. Sampling locations and ocean currents schematic in the studied area. TWC, Taiwan Warm Current; SCSWC, South China Sea Warm Current; MZCC, the coastal currents of Zhejiang and Fujian; GDCC, Guangdong coastal current. The direction of MZCC and GDCC varies seasonally, from south to north in summer and vice versa in winter [27], which is indicated by the solid line with bidirectional arrows in the figure.
Figure 1. Sampling locations and ocean currents schematic in the studied area. TWC, Taiwan Warm Current; SCSWC, South China Sea Warm Current; MZCC, the coastal currents of Zhejiang and Fujian; GDCC, Guangdong coastal current. The direction of MZCC and GDCC varies seasonally, from south to north in summer and vice versa in winter [27], which is indicated by the solid line with bidirectional arrows in the figure.
Biology 12 00437 g001

2.2. Statistical Analyses of Genetic Data

All sequences were checked and edited using Geneious. Multiple sequences were aligned using the Geneious Alignment (Identity 1.0/0.0), and all alignments were checked visually. MEGA11 was used to evaluate the composition of the nucleotides. DnaSP v.4.0 was used to calculate the genetic diversity indices such as the number of haplotypes (h), haplotype diversity (Hd) and nucleotide diversity (π).
A map of haplotypes distribution was constructed using ArcGIS, R 4.2 and Arlequin 3.5, and minimum spanning networks were constructed using PopART 1.7. Hierarchical analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) of the different levels was used to further examine the population structure. The AMOVA based on three levels included population level (MA, ZJS, HA, DT, NJLD, FYLD, PT, MZD, CW, XM, QA, DH, JH, DZG, SYH), region level (the East China Sea: MA, ZJS, HA, DT, NJLD, FYLD, PT, MZD, CW, XM; the South China Sea: QA, DH, JH, DZG, SYH) and ecoregion level (East China Sea Ecoregion: MZD, PT, FYLD, NJLD, DT, HA, ZJS, MA; Southern China Ecoregion: DH, QA, XM, CW; Gulf of Tonkin Ecoregion: JH, DZG, SYH). The significance of AMOVA was analyzed by 10,000 permutations. The fixation index (FST) was employed to assess the pairwise genetic divergence between different populations and the significance was obtained by 10,000 permutations.
Migrate-n 3.6 was conducted to estimate the mutation-scaled migration rate M (M = m / μ, where m was the historical migration rate among populations and μ was mutation per generation) and mutation-scaled population size θ (θ = Ne × µ, where Ne was historical effective population size). The runs were recorded every 100 steps for a total of 1,000,000 long-chain Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) steps and a burn-in of 1000. To improve the efficiency of the MCMC search, a static heating scheme with four different temperatures (1.0, 1.5, 3.0 and 1,000,000.0) was used. We inspected histograms of estimated θ and M posterior values to assess convergence. We calculated historical gene flow (Nm) by using the equation Nm = θ × M (when using mitochondrial gene).

3. Results

3.1. Population Genetic Diversity

A total of 253 COI sequences (538 bp, OP989704-956) and 95 D-Loop sequences (611 bp-612 bp, ON504951-995) were obtained from 15 populations of horn-eyed ghost crab. For COI sequences, the average contents of A, T, G and C were 26.6%, 34.6%, 16.8% and 22.0%, respectively. A total of 50 polymorphic sites were detected, including 24 singleton variable sites and 26 parsimony informative sites. Haplotype diversity ranged from 0.80 to 0.98, and nucleotide diversity ranged from 0.0022 to 0.0054 (Table 2). When the 15 populations were considered as a metapopulation, the haplotype diversity was 0.87, and the nucleotide diversity was 0.0036 (Table 2).
The average contents of A, T, G and C were 42.7%, 32.6%, 9.6% and 15.0%, respectively, according to the results based on D-Loop sequences. A total of 116 polymorphic sites were found, including 89 parsimony informative sites and 27 singleton variable sites. The genetic diversity parameters showed that nucleotide diversity ranged from 0.0192 to 0.0379, and haplotype diversity ranged from 0.90 to 1.00 (Table 2). When the 15 populations were considered as a whole, the nucleotide diversity was 0.0279, and the haplotype diversity was 1.00. In conclusion, both genetic markers demonstrated high genetic diversity in horn-eyed ghost crab populations.

3.2. Haplotype Analysis

The COI sequences identified 62 haplotypes (Hap 1-62), including 24 shared haplotypes and 38 exclusive haplotypes. The frequencies of 62 haplotypes varied widely; the combined frequencies of Hap 1 and Hap 2 were as high as 49.40%, with the highest frequency of Hap 2 (26.48%), followed by Hap 1 (22.92%), while the remaining haplotypes were less frequent. Two haplotypes (Hap 1-2) were shared by 15 populations (Figure 2), while common haplotypes (Hap 1-2, Hap 7, Hap 10 and Hap 13) also existed in populations that were far apart (up to 1000 km), according to the geographic distribution of haplotypes (Figure 2). The haplotype network also showed that Hap 1 and Hap 2 were shared by 15 populations, Hap 13 was shared by 11 populations. In general, the haplotype network showed a shallow double star-shaped structure (Figure S1).
A total of 91 haplotypes were detected in 95 D-Loop sequences from the 15 populations, which were defined as Hap 1-91, consisting of one shared haplotype and 90 exclusive haplotypes. The frequencies of Hap 25, Hap 29, Hap 47 and Hap 72 were all 2.11%, and the rest of haplotypes were found only once. According to the geographic distribution of haplotypes, Hap 29 was shared by two populations (XM and DZG). There were few shared haplotypes between diverse populations and no dominant haplotypes (Figure 2). The haplotype network also showed that only Hap 29 was shared by two populations. Additionally, the haplotype network presented a bush-like shape (Figure S2).

3.3. Population Genetic Structure

Based on COI sequences, at the region level, −0.22% of the variation was found between regions, with −0.18% of the variance found within regions among populations and 100.40% within populations. At the ecoregion level, most of the total variation (100.04%) was accounted for by differentiation within populations, with a further −0.80% accounting for variation within ecoregions among populations, and the remainder (0.76%) partitioned among ecoregions (Table 3). At the population level, −0.29% of the total variance was found among populations, whilst 100.29% of the variance was found within populations. The AMOVA statistical tests were not significant in all three levels (p > 0.05). The pairwise population FST showed that the genetic differences between populations ranged from −0.0456 to 0.0602. All pairwise FST values were not statistically significant (p > 0.05; Table S3).
Based on the D-Loop sequences, at the region level, −0.86% of the variation was found between regions, with −0.44% of the variance found within regions among populations and 101.29% within populations. At the ecoregion level, most of the total variation (101.27%) was accounted for by differentiation within populations, with a further 0.04% accounting for variation within ecoregions among populations, and the remainder (−1.31%) partitioned among ecoregions. At the population level, −0.82% of the total variance was found among populations, whilst 100.82% of the variance was found within populations (Table 3). AMOVA statistical tests in all three levels were not significant (Table 3). Furthermore, the FST values between populations were distributed between -0.1128 and 0.2675, the genetic differentiation between the remaining populations showed insignificant differences (p > 0.05), except for the significant differences between MZD and FYLD, and between MZD and HA (p < 0.05; Table S4). Two genetic markers revealed a high level of genetic homogeneity among the 15 populations of horn-eyed ghost crab and there was no significant genetic structure.

3.4. Migration and Connectivity

Based on COI sequences, the estimated historical gene flow ranged from 4.921 (MZD-FYLD) to 248.595 (QA-DH), while the estimated historical gene flow varied from 10.738 (SYH-DT) to 334.675 (CW-FYLD) based on D-Loop sequences. Two markers revealed the high historical gene flow among populations of horn-eyed ghost crab. The historical gene flow from MZD to most other populations was lower than that of most other populations to MZD based on two markers.
Based on COI sequences, the estimated migration rate ranged from 134.7 (QA-FYLD) to 390.1 (MZD-QA), while the estimated migration rate varied from 159.3 (PT-SYH) to 284.1 (SYH-NJLD) based on D-Loop sequences. The analysis consequences of two markers exhibited the high migration rates among populations. The COI sequences further showed the asymmetric migration rate with the higher migration rate from south to north than from north to south. Meanwhile, the migration rate from SYH to most other populations was higher than the migration rate from that of most other populations to SYH based on two markers (Figure 3). In addition, Migrate-n also revealed that the effective population sizes of each population based on both markers were relatively close (Table S5).

4. Discussion

In this study, 15 populations of horn-eyed ghost crab were collected in or near 15 MPAs in the East and South China Seas to analyze connectivity among populations based on COI and D-Loop. The results revealed that the high genetic diversity and connectivity among populations, and a high historical gene flow and migration rate among 15 populations were supported by two markers. Additionally, the COI sequences further showed the asymmetric migration rate with a higher migration rate from south to north than from north to south. The results of population structure and connectivity could reflect the connectivities between the marine protected areas in the two seas. These results could offer information for the management of the marine protected areas in the study areas.

4.1. Differences of Genetic Diversity in Populations

High haplotype diversity (Hd > 0.5) and low nucleotide diversity (π < 0.005) were observed based on COI sequences when the 15 populations were considered as a whole. This low nucleotide diversity and high haplotype diversity were in line with the genetic diversity of COI sequences from other marine organisms, particularly marine crustacean species such as Pachygrapsus crassipes [28] and Portunus trituberculatus [29]. D-Loop, on the other hand, showed high haplotype diversity (Hd > 0.5) and high nucleotide diversity (π > 0.005). In contrast, the higher genetic diversity was revealed by D-Loop marker, which may be related to the mutation rate of the fragment [30]. D-Loop is the high mutation region, located on either side of the central conserved region, which evolves two to five times faster than mitochondrial protein-coding genes [31], and thus may be more sensitive in genetic diversity analysis than COI marker [32]. This disagreement was often seen in studies of multiple molecular markers [31].
Because the sampling sites of horn-eyed ghost crab were located in or near MPAs, the results of genetic diversity may provide some reference for the management effectiveness of MPAs. Species and populations are adversely affected by anthropogenic activities, such as habitat modification, which are a global phenomenon [33]. These negative impacts eventually would reduce the genetic diversity [34]. The management effectiveness of a protected area is generally considered to be closely related to its conservation effectiveness, and a good protection management is also expected to have a higher level of biodiversity [35]. In this study, we also found that the marine protected areas with high genetic diversity also had a higher management effectiveness. For example, the high genetic diversity in NJLD and MA was observed, for which a high management effectiveness in both protected areas was reported [36]. FYLD had the low genetic diversity based on two markers, and it also had a lower score of management effectiveness in this protected area [37]. Therefore, it might support that the level of population genetic diversity is related to the management effectiveness of the marine protected areas. However, more tests are required to explore the relationship between genetic diversity and MPA management effectiveness.

4.2. Connectivity Differences among Populations

The spatial distribution of haplotypes and the haplotype network based on COI sequences showed that the most common Hap 1 and Hap 2, accounting for almost 49.40% of samples, were found in all 15 populations. Shared haplotypes may be related with the large population sizes and high rates of migration [38]. Among the COI haplotypes, shared haplotypes existed between distant populations (up to 1000 km), which indicated that dispersal of this species may occur over long distances. In contrast, the existence of lower-frequency haplotypes was related with large population sizes, and this is because these haplotypes were not eliminated by the selection when in a large stable population [39]. Whereas the spatial distribution of haplotypes and the haplotype network from D-Loop revealed few shared haplotypes among populations, it may not represent low connectivity among populations, but be due to DNA superdiversity [40,41]. This result may be explained by the combination of small samples and high mutation rates in D-loop sequences [41]. Therefore, results from COI might provide more reliable results on the spatial distribution and connectivity.
In this research, the high level of connectivity among 15 populations, between ECS populations and SCS populations and among three ecoregion populations of horn-eyed ghost crab was observed based on the results of AMOVA and FST for two markers, which was also consistent with the findings of Collichthys lucidus [42], Larimichthys crocea [43], Pampus chinensis [44] and Thamnaconus hypargyreus [17]. The high connectivity among populations may be due to the long planktonic larval period of 34–42 days for horn-eyed ghost crab [45], which could allow distant geographical distances between populations to be overcome and produce genetic homogeneity [46]. On the other hand, ocean currents may promote connectivity among populations [42]. During the planktonic larval stage of horn-eyed ghost crab in summer, the current from the surface to the bottom is almost consistent with the northeast flow parallel to the coast in the coastal area from Xiangshan to Pearl River Estuary [47], which may result in high connectivity among populations. Meanwhile, this may account for the higher migration rate from south to north revealed by the COI marker in this study. It was also in line with the results of an analysis of seven mangrove species on the southern coast of China [48]. Nevertheless, the directional difference was not observed in the migration rate results based on D-Loop sequences, which may be due to the fact that the higher mutation rate of the D-Loop marker was not conducive to the prediction of gene flow or less number of D-Loop sequences [49]. In addition, Migrate-n also revealed a large population size in each population of horn-eyed ghost crab. Such population may be insensitive to the loss and reorganization of variation by genetic drift, and could maintain the ancestral genetic information [50], leading to high genetic connectivity among populations.

4.3. Conservation and Management Implications for MPA

Although it is not clear whether marine protected areas in the East and South China Seas could form a network, the results of this study may provide some suggestions for the construction of such a network due to the sampling sites of horn-eyed ghost crab being located in or near protected areas. The higher migration rate from south to north related to the current in summer was revealed based on COI sequences in this research. Consequently, the hydrodynamic characteristics of the East and South China Seas should be considered in constructing a MPA network. In the near-shore areas of the East and South China Seas, the Guangdong coastal current (GDCC) and the coastal currents of Zhejiang and Fujian (MZCC) are the main currents [27]. In summer, the direction of MZCC and GDCC is northward along the parallel shoreline, but in winter, the MZCC and GDCC flow in the southwesterly direction [47]. These season-changed currents should be included in the design of the MPA network, because organisms that reproduce in different seasons may have completely different connectivity patterns [51], especially those that reproduce in only one season.
Many protected species such as Acropora solitarvensis, Epinephelus akaara and Epinephelus bruneus spawn during summer [52]. The summer fishing moratorium implemented by the Chinese government in the East and South China Seas [53,54] contributes to the protection of larvae and may complement the MPA network [55]. This has also been shown in previous studies. A study of fish resources in Daya Bay showed that the stock density, species number, biodiversity and evenness index increased after the summer fishing moratorium period, indicating that the structure of the ecological community improved [56]. Additionally, in a study in the coastal ocean of Ningbo, the SCS showed that species richness, abundance and biomass of macrobenthos communities increased significantly during the summer fishing moratorium period, which implied this policy could facilitate the resilience of microbenthic communities [57]. However, focusing solely on the spawning patterns of these species for reserve design will decrease protection of fall–winter spawners when the direction of the gyres and the location of upstream larval sources reverses [51]. For example, at least some important species such as Anguilla japonica and Penaeus japonicus also spawn exclusively during fall–winter [52]. So, flexible management strategies could be carried out during the winter for the conservation of these species. For example, seasonal closures or fishing intensity restrictions could be assigned to their spawning sites and core areas of activity [58]. Moreover, seasonal protection corridors could be set up in areas with high connectivity during the planktonic larval period, and these areas should be a priority for new protected areas in the future.

5. Conclusions

This study investigated the genetic connectivity among the populations of Ocypode ceratophthalmus in the East and South China Seas based on wide geographic sampling and two genetic markers. The results showed that the horn-eyed ghost crab had high genetic diversity. The AMOVA analysis revealed no significant genetic structure and high genetic connectivity among the populations. All the FST values obtained from COI sequences were inapparent. The FST values based on D-Loop sequences were only significant between MZD and FYLD as well as between MZD and HA. Migrate-n revealed the high historical gene flow and connectivity among 15 populations based on two markers. The COI sequences further showed asymmetric connectivity with higher connectivity from south to north than from north to south. The outcomes from this study provide suggestions for the construction of marine protected areas.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biology12030437/s1, Table S1: Current status of genetic connectivity between populations in the East China Sea and populations in the South China Sea; Table S2: The information of carapace width, carapace length, abdomen width, abdomen length, weight and gender for the horn-eyed ghost crab; Table S3: Pairwise FST values between populations based on COI sequences; Table S4: Pairwise FST values between populations based on D-Loop sequences; Table S5: The effective population sizes for each population based on COI and D-Loop sequences; Figure S1: The minimum spanning network based on COI sequences; Figure S2: The minimum spanning network based on D-Loop sequences.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.Z. and F.Z.; methodology, C.Z., F.Z. and J.L.; data analysis, F.Z., Y.L. and Z.W. writing, F.Z. and C.Z.; funding acquisition, C.Z. and L.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

We would like to thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 42206082 and 42142018), Ministry of Science and Technology of China (Grant No. 2022YFC3102400), New Faculty Start-Up Program of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (22X010503822), Shanghai Pilot Program for Basic Research at Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Grant No. 21TQ1400220), Oceanic Interdisciplinary Program of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Grant No. SL2022PT110), Blue Planet Found (OPF & WWF)(Grant No. PORO001426), Key Laboratory of Marine Ecological Monitoring and Restoration Technologies (Grant No. MEMRT202112), and Shanghai Frontiers Science Center of Polar Science (SCOPS) for financial support. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funders.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

DNA sequences have been deposited in GenBank.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ding, H.; Xu, H.; Wu, J.; Le Quesne, W.; Sweeting, C.; Polunin, N. An overview of spatial management and marine protected areas in the East China Sea. Coast. Manag. 2008, 36, 443–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Teh, L.S.; Cashion, T.; Cheung, W.W.; Sumaila, U.R. Taking stock: A Large Marine Ecosystem perspective of socio-economic and ecological trends in East China Sea fisheries. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 2020, 30, 269–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yao, Y. On the construction of South China Sea Mrine Protected Area from the perspective of a community of shared future of mankind: Realistic requirements, theoretical basisi and China’s countermeasures. J. Guangxi Univ. 2019, 41, 96–106. [Google Scholar]
  4. Asaad, I.; Lundquist, C.J.; Erdmann, M.V.; Costello, M.J. Delineating priority areas for marine biodiversity conservation in the Coral Triangle. Biol. Conserv. 2018, 222, 198–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. He, J. A Legal Analysis of the Construction of Marine Protected Areas in the South China Sea and Its Impact. Master’s Thesis, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  6. Zeng, X.; Chen, M.Y.; Zeng, C.; Cheng, S.; Wang, Z.H.; Liu, S.R.; Zou, C.X.; Ye, S.F.; Zhu, Z.G.; Cao, L. Assessing the management effectiveness of China’s marine protected areas: Challenges and recommendations. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2022, 224, 106172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. McLeod, E.; Salm, R.; Green, A.; Almany, J. Designing marine protected area networks to address the impacts of climate change. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2009, 7, 362–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Planes, S.; Jones, G.P.; Thorrold, S.R. Larval dispersal connects fish populations in a network of marine protected areas. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 5693–5697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Toonen, R.J.; Andrews, K.R.; Baums, I.B.; Bird, C.E.; Concepcion, G.T.; Daly-Engel, T.S.; Eble, J.A.; Faucci, A.; Gaither, M.R.; Iacchei, M. Defining boundaries for ecosystem-based management: A multispecies case study of marine connectivity across the Hawaiian Archipelago. J. Mar. Biol. 2011, 2011, 460173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Spalding, M.D.; Fox, H.E.; Allen, G.R.; Davidson, N.; Ferdaña, Z.A.; Finlayson, M.; Halpern, B.S.; Jorge, M.A.; Lombana, A.; Lourie, S.A. Marine ecoregions of the world: A bioregionalization of coastal and shelf areas. BioScience 2007, 57, 573–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Hashimoto, K.; Yamada, K.; Sekino, M.; Kobayashi, M.; Sasaki, T.; Fujinami, Y.; Yamamoto, M.; Choi, K.S.; Henmi, Y. Population genetic structure of the pen shell Atrina pectinata sensu lato (Bivalvia: Pinnidae) throughout East Asia. Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci. 2021, 48, 102024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Xu, D.D.; Lou, B.; Shi, H.L.; Geng, Z.; Li, S.L.; Zhang, Y.R. Genetic diversity and population structure of Nibea albiflora in the China Sea revealed by mitochondrial COI sequences. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2012, 45, 158–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dou, C.F. Analysis of genetic diversity and structure of Octopus ovulum. China Water Transp. 2017, 17, 165–167. [Google Scholar]
  14. Xu, Y. Studies on Molecular Phylogeny of Sesarmid Crabs from the Coast of China and Molecular Phylogeography of Two Mangrove Crabs. Master’s Thesis, Guangxi University, Nanjing, China, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  15. He, L.J.; Mukai, T.; Chu, K.H.; Ma, Q.; Zhang, J. Biogeographical role of the Kuroshio Current in the amphibious mudskipper Periophthalmus modestus indicated by mitochondrial DNA data. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 15645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Wang, J.; Tsang, L.M.; Dong, Y.W. Causations of phylogeographic barrier of some rocky shore species along the Chinese coastline. Bmc Evol. Biol. 2015, 15, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Wang, Z.Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, L.L.; Song, N.; Han, Z.Q.; Gao, T.X. Shallow mitochondrial phylogeographical pattern and high levels of genetic connectivity of Thamnaconus hypargyreus in the South China Sea and the East China Sea. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2016, 67, 110–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. JinXian, L.I.U.; TianYiang, G.A.O.; ShiFang, W.U. Pleistocene Isolation in the Northwestern Pacific Marginal Seas and Limited Dispersal in a Marine Fish, Chelon haematocheilus (Temminck & Schlegel, 1845). J. Ocean Univ. China 2007, 37, 931–938. [Google Scholar]
  19. Wang, J.J.; Sun, P.; Yin, F. Low mtDNA Cytb diversity and shallow population structure of Eleutheronema tetradactylum in the East China Sea and the South China Sea. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2014, 55, 268–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, S.P.; Liu, T.; Li, Z.F.; Gao, T.X. Genetic population structuring and demographic history of red spotted grouper (Epinephelus akaara) in South and East China Sea. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2008, 7, 3554–3562. [Google Scholar]
  21. Perez-Enriquez, R.; Taniguchi, N. Genetic structure of red sea bream (Pagrus major) population off Japan and the Southwest Pacific, using microsatellite DNA markers. Fish. Sci. 1999, 65, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Zeng, L.Y.; Cheng, Q.Q.; Chen, X.Y. Microsatellite analysis reveals the population structure and migration patterns of Scomber japonicus (Scombridae) with continuous distribution in the East and South China Seas. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2012, 42, 83–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ni, G. Phylogeography of Four Marine Bivalves Along China’ Coastline, with Views into the Evolutionary Processes and Mechanisms. Ph.D. Thesis, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, China, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  24. Ma, K.Y.; Chow, L.H.; Wong, K.J.H.; Chen, H.N.; Ip, B.H.Y.; Schubart, C.D.; Tsang, L.M.; Chan, B.K.K.; Chu, K.H. Speciation pattern of the horned ghost crab Ocypode ceratophthalmus (Pallas, 1772): An evaluation of the drivers of Indo-Pacific marine biodiversity using a widely distributed species. J. Biogeogr. 2019, 46, 830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Shen, R.J.; Dai, A.Y. Illustrated Fauna of China: Crustacea. In Volume 2 Crabs; Science Press: Beijing, China, 1964; 142p. [Google Scholar]
  26. Jenkins, T.L.; Stevens, J.R. Assessing connectivity between MPAs: Selecting taxa and translating genetic data to inform policy. Mar. Policy 2018, 94, 165–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Roberts, K.E.; Cook, C.N.; Beher, J.; Treml, E.A. Assessing the current state of ecological connectivity in a large marine protected area system. Conserv. Biol. 2021, 35, 699–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Cassone, B.J.; Boulding, E.G. Genetic structure and phylogeography of the lined shore crab, Pachygrapsus crassipes, along the northeastern and western Pacific coasts. Mar. Biol. 2006, 149, 213–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ren, G.; Miao, G.; Ma, C.; Lu, J.; Yang, X.; Ma, H. Genetic structure and historical demography of the blue swimming crab (Portunus pelagicus) from southeastern sea of China based on mitochondrial COI gene. Mitochondrial DNA Part A 2018, 29, 192–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Canales-Aguirre, C.B.; Ferrada-Fuentes, S.; Galleguillos, R.; Oyarzun, F.X.; Hernandez, C.E. Population genetic structure of Patagonian toothfish (Dissostichus eleginoides) in the Southeast Pacific and Southwest Atlantic Ocean. PeerJ 2018, 6, e4173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Xu, H.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, D.; Lou, B.; Guo, Y.; Sun, X.; Guo, B. Genetic population structure of miiuy croaker (Miichthys miiuy) in the Yellow and East China Seas base on mitochondrial COI sequences. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2014, 54, 240–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ma, Z.F.; Pan, Q.Z.; An, M.; Yu, K.; Huang, S.; Li, S.; He, X.K. Analysis of genetic diversity of Siniperca scherzeri population in Qinshui river based on Mitochondrial Cytb and D-Loop Sequences. Mar. Fish. 2022, 44, 657–669. [Google Scholar]
  33. Ewers, R.M.; Didham, R.K. Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation. Biol. Rev. 2006, 81, 117–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Pacioni, C.; Hunt, H.; Allentoft, M.E.; Vaughan, T.G.; Wayne, A.F.; Baynes, A.; Haouchar, D.; Dortch, J.; Bunce, M. Genetic diversity loss in a biodiversity hotspot: Ancient DNA quantifies genetic decline and former connectivity in a critically endangered marsupial. Mol. Ecol. 2015, 24, 5813–5828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Feng, B. Study on the Management Effectiveness of Nature Reserve System of Guangxi in the Context of Climate Change. Ph.D. Thesis, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing, China, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  36. Zhuang, Q. Study on the Gap Analysis and Establishment Management of Xiamen Marine Protect Area. Master’s Thesis, Third Institute of Oceanography, Xiamen, China, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  37. Chen, M.Y.; Zeng, C.; Zeng, X.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Z.H.; Shi, X.J.; Cao, L. Assessment of Marine Protected Areas in the East China Sea Using a Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool. Front. Mar. Sci. 2022, 10, 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Eastwood, E.K.; Lopez, E.H.; Drew, J.A. Population Connectivity Measures of Fishery-Targeted Coral Reef Species to Inform Marine Reserve Network Design in Fiji. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 19318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Duran, S.; Palacin, C.; Becerro, M.A.; Turon, X.; Giribet, G. Genetic diversity and population structure of the commercially harvested sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus (Echinodermata, Echinoidea). Mol. Ecol. 2004, 13, 3317–3328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Robalo, J.I.; Francisco, S.M.; Vendrell, C.; Lima, C.S.; Pereira, A.; Brunner, B.P.; Dia, M.; Gordo, L.; Castilho, R. Against all odds: A tale of marine range expansion with maintenance of extremely high genetic diversity. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 12707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Fourdrilis, S.; Backeljau, T. Highly polymorphic mitochondrial DNA and deceiving haplotypic differentiation: Implications for assessing population genetic differentiation and connectivity. BMC Evol. Biol. 2019, 19, 92. [Google Scholar]
  42. Song, N.; Ma, G.; Zhang, X.; Gao, T.; Sun, D. Genetic structure and historical demography of Collichthys lucidus inferred from mtDNA sequence analysis. Environ. Biol. Fishes 2014, 97, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Han, Z.; Xu, H.; Shui, B.; Zhou, Y.; Gao, T. Lack of genetic structure in endangered large yellow croaker Larimichthys crocea from China inferred from mitochondrial control region sequence data. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2015, 61, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sun, P.; Tang, B.; Yin, F. Population genetic structure and genetic diversity of Chinese pomfret at the coast of the East China Sea and the South China Sea. Mitochondrial DNA Part A 2018, 29, 643–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hughes, R.N.; Hughes, D.J.; Smith, I.P. The ecology of ghost crabs. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Annu. Rev. 2014, 52, 201–256. [Google Scholar]
  46. Otwoma, L.M.; Reuter, H.; Timm, J.; Meyer, A. Genetic connectivity in a herbivorous coral reef fish (Acanthurus leucosternon Bennet, 1833) in the Eastern African region. Hydrobiologia 2018, 806, 237–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhang, Z.X. Observation and Analysis of the Coastal Current and Its Adjacent Current System in the China Offshore Waters. Ph.D. Thesis, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, China, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  48. Geng, Q.F.; Wang, Z.S.; Tao, J.M.; Kimura, M.K.; Liu, H.; Hogetsu, T.; Lian, C.L. Ocean Currents Drove Genetic Structure of Seven Dominant Mangrove Species Along the Coastlines of Southern China. Front. Genet. 2021, 12, 615911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Musilova, Z.; Kalous, L.; Petrtýl, M.; Chaloupková, P. Cichlid fishes in the Angolan headwaters region: Molecular evidence of the ichthyofaunal contact between the Cuanza and Okavango-Zambezi systems. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e65047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Gagnaire, P.A.; Broquet, T.; Aurelle, D.; Viard, F.; Souissi, A.; Bonhomme, F.; Arnaud-Haond, S.; Bierne, N. Using neutral, selected, and hitchhiker loci to assess connectivity of marine populations in the genomic era. Evol. Appl. 2015, 8, 769–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Munguia-Vega, A.; Green, A.L.; Suarez-Castillo, A.N.; Espinosa-Romero, M.J.; Aburto-Oropeza, O.; Cisneros-Montemayor, A.M.; Cruz-Pinon, G.; Danemann, G.; Giron-Nava, A.; Gonzalez-Cuellar, O.; et al. Ecological guidelines for designing networks of marine reserves in the unique biophysical environment of the Gulf of California. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 2018, 28, 749–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Lu, J.Y.; Chen, Y.J.; Wang, Z.H.; Zhao, F.; Zhong, Y.S.; Zeng, C.; Cao, L. Larval dispersal modeling reveals low connectivity among national marine protected areas in the Yellow and East China. Biology 2023, 12, 396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Chen, L.L.; Zhu, X.L.; Ni, S.F.; Yan, Z.Q.; Xu, F.C. Research on the policy instrument of the fishing ban in the autumn season in the East China Sea of China- based on the content analysis of policy texts since 2011. China Fish. 2022, 12, 60–63. [Google Scholar]
  54. Huang, C.D. A study on the administrative law of Fishing Ban in the summer in the South China Sea: A case of Naozhou island. Leg. Syst. Soc. 2020, 13, 125–126. [Google Scholar]
  55. Chen, R.L.; Wu, X.Q.; Liu, B.J.; Wang, Y.Q.; Gao, Z.Q. Mapping coastal fishing grounds and assessing the effectiveness of fishery regulation measures with AIS data: A case study of the sea area around the Bohai Strait, China. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2022, 223, 106136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Yu, J.; Hu, Q.; Yuan, H.; Tong, F.; Chen, P.; Mao, J. Effects assessment of summer fishing moratorium in Daya Bay in the Northern South China Sea. J. Geosci. Environ. Prot. 2017, 5, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Liu, X.; Wang, Y.N.; Jiao, H.F.; Chen, C.; Liu, D.; Shi, H.X.; You, Z.J. Temporal Dynamics of Fishing Affect the Biodiversity of Macrobenthic Epifaunal Communities in the Coastal Waters of Ningbo, East China Sea. Thalassas 2021, 37, 39–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Meyer, C.G.; Holland, K.N.; Papastamatiou, Y.P. Seasonal and diel movements of giant trevally Caranx ignobilis at remote Hawaiian atolls: Implications for the design of Marine Protected Areas. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2007, 333, 13–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Biology 12 00437 g002 550
Figure 2. Haplotype map for horn-eyed ghost crab COI (left) and D-loop (right). Numbers represented the number of sequences used for analysis. Different colors represented different haplotypes.
Figure 2. Haplotype map for horn-eyed ghost crab COI (left) and D-loop (right). Numbers represented the number of sequences used for analysis. Different colors represented different haplotypes.
Biology 12 00437 g002
Biology 12 00437 g003 550
Figure 3. Historical gene flow (Nm) and migration rate (M) among 15 populations of horn-eyed ghost crab based on COI and D-Loop sequences. (a) Nm values based on COI sequences; (b) Nm values based on D-Loop sequences; (c) M values based on COI sequences; (d) M values based on D-Loop sequences.
Figure 3. Historical gene flow (Nm) and migration rate (M) among 15 populations of horn-eyed ghost crab based on COI and D-Loop sequences. (a) Nm values based on COI sequences; (b) Nm values based on D-Loop sequences; (c) M values based on COI sequences; (d) M values based on D-Loop sequences.
Biology 12 00437 g003
Table
Table 1. Location and sampling details for each population.
Table 1. Location and sampling details for each population.
RegionEcoregionMPA *PopulationNumber of SamplesWeight (g)Sampling Time
East China SeaEast China Sea EcoregionDongtou National Marine Park (in)DT2018.06 ± 6.1727 April 2022
Fuyao Archipelago National Marine Park (in)FYLD1518.63 ± 5.7030 March 2022
Haitan Bay National Marine Park (in)PT1813.68 ± 4.546 March 2022
Hua’ao Island National Marine Park (near)HA1515.89 ± 4.158 April 2022
Ma’an Archipelago Special Marine Protected Area (in)MA155.41 ± 2.2510 December 2021
Meizhou Island National Marine Park (in)MZD1613.38 ± 2.665 March 2022
Nanji Archipelago National Nature Reserve (in)NJLD1016.15 ± 6.9518 April 2022
Zhongjieshan Archipelago Special Marine Protected Area (near)ZJS1422.82 ± 7.1118 April 2022
Southern China EcoregionChongwu National Marine Park (in)CW2416.59 ± 5.408 January 2022
Xiamen National Marine Park (in)XM1816.65 ± 5.722 January 2022
South China SeaSouthern China EcoregionQing’ao Bay National Marine Park (near)QA2215.01 ± 3.548 January 2022
Zhelang Peninsula National Marine Park (near)DH1514.43 ± 4.5622 March 2022
Gulf of Tonkin EcoregionDongzhai Bay National Nature Reserve (near)DZG215.28 ± 2.5118 September 2021
Jinhai Bay Mangrove Protected Area (near)JH1518.89 ± 6.091 April 2022
Sanya River Mangrove Nature Reserve (near)SYH155.54 ± 2.5018 September 2021
* In this column, the contents in parentheses indicate that the sampling site is in or near the marine protected areas, “in” indicates that the sampling site is in the reserve, and “near” indicates that the sampling site is near the marine protected areas.
Table
Table 2. Genetic diversity for 15 populations of horn-eyed ghost crab based on COI/D-Loop sequences. N, number of specimens for each population; h, the number of haplotypes; Hd, haplotype diversity; π, nucleotide diversity.
Table 2. Genetic diversity for 15 populations of horn-eyed ghost crab based on COI/D-Loop sequences. N, number of specimens for each population; h, the number of haplotypes; Hd, haplotype diversity; π, nucleotide diversity.
RegionPopulationCOID-Loop
NhHdπNhHdπ
The East China SeaCW24120.87 ± 0.050.0034 ± 0.0006991.00 ± 0.050.0279 ± 0.0033
XM18120.95 ± 0.030.0054 ± 0.0007991.00 ± 0.050.0281 ± 0.0028
MA1590.88 ± 0.070.0037 ± 0.0007551.00 ± 0.130.0314 ± 0.0052
PT18100.88 ± 0.060.0050 ± 0.0010540.90 ± 0.160.0271 ± 0.0050
MZD1680.88 ± 0.050.0030 ± 0.0005661.00 ± 0.100.0230 ± 0.0033
HA1590.88 ± 0.070.0034 ± 0.0006661.00 ± 0.100.0192 ± 0.0035
NJLD1090.98 ± 0.050.0043 ± 0.0008551.00 ± 0.130.0298 ± 0.0051
ZJS1490.90 ± 0.060.0036 ± 0.000710101.00 ± 0.050.0306 ± 0.0028
FYLD1570.82 ± 0.080.0022 ± 0.0004760.95 ± 0.100.0233 ± 0.0035
DT20110.86 ± 0.070.0037 ± 0.0007551.00 ± 0.130.0257 ± 0.0048
The South China SeaQA22140.93 ± 0.040.0036 ± 0.0005551.00 ± 0.130.0331 ± 0.0063
JH1570.81 ± 0.080.0027 ± 0.0006551.00 ± 0.130.0379 ± 0.0061
DZG2190.86 ± 0.050.0027 ± 0.0004551.00 ± 0.130.0268 ± 0.0064
SYH1570.80 ± 0.080.0032 ± 0.0009760.95 ± 0.100.0278 ± 0.0038
DH15120.94 ± 0.050.0052 ± 0.0010661.00 ± 0.100.0313 ± 0.0052
Table
Table 3. AMOVA results of horn-eyed ghost crab based on COI and D-Loop sequences.
Table 3. AMOVA results of horn-eyed ghost crab based on COI and D-Loop sequences.
Different ClassificationsGenetic MarkersSource of VariationdfSum of SquaresVariance ComponentsPercentage of Variation
Region level
(ECS and SCS)		COIBetween regions10.708−0.002−0.22
Within regions among populations1312.383−0.002−0.18
within populations238233.8730.983100.40
Total252246.9640.979
D-LoopBetween regions15.481−0.072−0.86
Within regions among populations13108.307−0.037−0.44
within populations80685.1818.565101.29
Total94798.9688.455
Ecoregion level (East China Sea Ecoregion, Southern China Ecoregion, Gulf of Tonkin Ecoregion)COIAmong ecoregions22.8570.0070.76
Within ecoregions among populations 1210.234−0.008−0.80
within populations238233.8730.983100.04
Total252246.9640.982
D-LoopAmong ecoregions210.766−0.111−1.31
Within ecoregions among populations12103.0210.0030.04
within populations80685.1818.565101.27
Total94798.9688.457
Population levelCOIAmong populations1413.091−0.003−0.29
within populations238233.8730.983100.29
Total252246.9640.980
D-LoopAmong populations14113.787−0.070−0.82
within populations80685.1818.565100.82
Total94798.9688.495
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, F.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Z.; Lu, J.; Cao, L.; Zeng, C. Genetic Diversity and Connectivity of Ocypode ceratophthalmus in the East and South China Seas and Its Implications for Conservation. Biology 2023, 12, 437. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12030437

AMA Style

Zhao F, Liu Y, Wang Z, Lu J, Cao L, Zeng C. Genetic Diversity and Connectivity of Ocypode ceratophthalmus in the East and South China Seas and Its Implications for Conservation. Biology. 2023; 12(3):437. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12030437

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Feng, Yue Liu, Zihan Wang, Jiaying Lu, Ling Cao, and Cong Zeng. 2023. "Genetic Diversity and Connectivity of Ocypode ceratophthalmus in the East and South China Seas and Its Implications for Conservation" Biology 12, no. 3: 437. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12030437

APA Style

Zhao, F., Liu, Y., Wang, Z., Lu, J., Cao, L., & Zeng, C. (2023). Genetic Diversity and Connectivity of Ocypode ceratophthalmus in the East and South China Seas and Its Implications for Conservation. Biology, 12(3), 437. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12030437

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop