Next Article in Journal
Quadruplex-Forming Motif Inserted into 3′UTR of Ty1his3-AI Retrotransposon Inhibits Retrotransposition in Yeast
Next Article in Special Issue
PI3K as Mediator of Apoptosis and Contractile Dysfunction in TGFβ1-Stimulated Cardiomyocytes
Previous Article in Journal
A New Approach to Quantifying Bioaccumulation of Elements in Biological Processes
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biology
Volume 10
Issue 4
10.3390/biology10040346
biology-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

ERK1/2: An Integrator of Signals That Alters Cardiac Homeostasis and Growth

by
Christopher J. Gilbert
†,
Jacob Z. Longenecker
† and
Federica Accornero
*
Department of Physiology and Cell Biology, Dorothy M. Davis Heart and Lung Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Equal contribution.
Biology 2021, 10(4), 346; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10040346
Submission received: 22 March 2021 / Revised: 15 April 2021 / Accepted: 16 April 2021 / Published: 20 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cardiac Protein Kinases as Homeostatic Molecular “Switches” and Regulators of Cell Fate)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Understanding how cardiac cells respond to external stimuli is essential for developing interventions that mitigate pathologies of the heart. Therefore, in this review, we summarize critical knowledge related to a key molecular pathway that mediates cellular responses.

Abstract

Integration of cellular responses to extracellular cues is essential for cell survival and adaptation to stress. Extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) 1 and 2 serve an evolutionarily conserved role for intracellular signal transduction that proved critical for cardiomyocyte homeostasis and cardiac stress responses. Considering the importance of ERK1/2 in the heart, understanding how these kinases operate in both normal and disease states is critical. Here, we review the complexity of upstream and downstream signals that govern ERK1/2-dependent regulation of cardiac structure and function. Particular emphasis is given to cardiomyocyte hypertrophy as an outcome of ERK1/2 activation regulation in the heart.

1. Introduction

Within the heart, cardiomyocytes represent the primary working cell responsible for contraction. However, how cardiomyocytes function is highly dependent upon the extracellular environment. In the extracellular matrix, a plethora of signals converge to communicate cellular needs and allow for stress responses [1]. In addition to serving as a signaling hub, the mechanical properties of the extracellular matrix itself can dictate cardiomyocyte behaviors [2]. Signal integration is necessary for survival, and as such, cardiomyocytes express a variety of cell membrane receptors that allow for signal transduction. Within these, integrins can directly sense mechanical deformations driven by changes in the extracellular matrix composition and stiffness [3]. On the other hand, other important classes of receptors such as the G-protein-coupled and the tyrosine kinase ones (GPCRs and RTKs respectively) are modulated by select extracellular factors that can be secreted by different cardiac cell types or even reach the heart from distal place while circulating into bloodstream [4].
Regardless of the origin of the extracellular signal, cardiomyocyte responses are dependent upon intracellular effectors. Extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2 (ERK1/2 or ERK) are effectors of primary importance for their role as integrators of signals derived from various extracellular events. Indeed, ERK can be activated by integrins, GPCRs and RTKs, and even more importantly ERK is critical for signaling crosstalks between all these receptors [5]. Therefore, it is not surprising that ERK plays a pivotal role in regulation of cardiomyocyte fate. While ERK acts throughout development, downstream of both acute and chronic stress, and in response to multiple types of stressors, the regulation of cardiomyocyte size and shape through hypertrophic remodeling has been highlighted as an indisputable role for ERK in the heart [6]. Therefore, this review will particularly focus on cardiac hypertrophy by describing the mouse models and studies that revealed the importance of the ERK pathway in cardiomyocytes. Prior to describing the consequences of ERK activation in the heart, we will describe the general mode of ERK signaling with a particular emphasis on the known downstream targets that ultimately mediate ERK actions.

2. The ERK1/2 Signaling Module

Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascades constitute serial phosphorylation networks by which external stimuli beget cellular consequences. To date, three such pathways have been established: extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase (ERK), c-Jun N-terminal kinase/stress-activated protein kinase (JNK/SAPK), and p38 kinase. Each of these comprises a tiered module whereby an MAPK kinase kinase (MAP3K) activates an MAPK kinase (MAP2K), which, in turn, activates an MAPK [7]. ERK signaling is initiated at the membrane through a milieu of receptor proteins, such as RTKs, GPCRs, and integrins. Classically, ligand binding elicits the recruitment of adaptor proteins and exchange factors to yield activated GTP-Ras, to which cytosolic kinases Raf-1, B-Raf, and A-Raf (MAP3Ks) are recruited [5]. Activated Raf functions to propagate the signal through the activation of dual-specificity kinases MEK1 and MEK2 (MAP2Ks), which function to phosphorylate ERK1 and ERK2 (MAPKs) [5]. Beyond these canonical factors, other MAP3K signaling components have also been observed to activate ERK1/2 under specific circumstances, such as MAP3K8 (also known as Tumor progression locus 2 or TPL2) [8] and MAP3K3 (also known as MEK kinase 3 or MEKK3) [9].
MAPKs are phosphorylated at Threonine (Thr) or Tyrosine (Tyr) residues within a Thr-X-Tyr motif in the kinase domain [10]. After their phosphorylation, ERK1 and ERK2 (henceforth referred to as singular ERK) function as kinases with redundant functions and regulation under most conditions. ERK functions as a proline-directed protein kinase (PDPK), whereby phosphorylation occurs to Ser/Thr residues adjacent to a Pro, to activate targets tied to cellular growth and proliferation [5]. ERK is ubiquitously expressed in mammals, highlighting its importance in regulating cell signaling in response to stimuli. To date, hundreds of proteins have been identified to interact with ERK. The fidelity of these interactions is arbitrated by targeting the consensus sequence PXS/TP and via specialized binding motifs [11]. ERK activity is also controlled via several phosphatases to regulate the duration of the transduced signal. While the dephosphorylation of ERK may be achieved by Ser/Thr [12] or Tyr phosphatases [13], there also exist specialized dual specificity phosphatases (DUSPs) that function to dephosphorylate both residues concurrently. These DUSPs comprise a phosphatase domain with a conserved catalytic site with Asp, Cys, and Arg residues within a flexible enzymatic pocket to accommodate phosphorylated targets [14]. Cytoplasmic DUSP6 and DUSP7 have been identified as ERK-specific, as has inducible nuclear DUSP5 [15,16]. Nuclear DUSP1, DUSP2, DUSP4, and DUSP9 also regulate ERK signaling, among other MAPK modules [16,17,18]. ERK is further regulated through the feedback of other MAPK components, within the ERK compartment and other modules, and several studies are aimed at better understanding the intersection of these conserved cascades [19]. Crosstalk with other cellular pathways such as PI3K–AKT–mTOR [20] and NF-κB [21] has also been identified.
Among the identified cytoplasmic targets of ERK are cytoskeletal elements, membrane receptors, and adherens junction proteins (Table 1). Several nuclear targets of ERK have also been identified (Table 1). Under resting conditions, ERK is retained in the cytoplasm by MEK1/2 or the microtubule network [22]. Upon its phosphorylation, ERK dissociates from MEK1/2, and phospho-ERKs have been observed to dimerize prior to interaction with cytoplasmic substrates. The nuclear translocation of ERK is mediated by passive diffusion of the monomer or active transport of the dimer as well as interaction with the nuclear pore complex [22]. Upon translocation, ERK directly phosphorylates transcription factors, such as Elk-1, to modulate cell growth [5]. Interestingly, such nuclear modifications solely occur by way of the monomer [23]. The spatial fidelity of interaction is further enforced by scaffold proteins to which ERK dimers may remain bound to prevent ERK nuclear translocation and favor its targeting of cytosolic substrates [23]. ERK also functions to phosphorylate mitogen-activated protein kinase-activated protein kinases (MAPKAPs). Activation of MAPKAPs RSK1 (ribosomal s6 family kinase 1), RSK2, and RSK3 elicits their nuclear translocation and downstream phosphorylation of transcription factor cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) to promote cell survival [24]. ERK also phosphorylates other MAPKAPs as MSK1/2 (mitogen- and stress-activated protein kinase), which are mediators of gene activation via histone H3 phosphorylation, and MNKs (MAP kinase-interacting serine/threonine-protein kinase), which play a role in phosphorylating translational machinery and splicing factors [25]. ERK has also been shown to phosphorylate and inactivate proapoptotic proteins, while activating proteins tied to transcription and translation [5]. Generally, the ability of ERK to control gene expression as well as its direct cytoplasmic role in the regulation of cell architecture defines this kinase as a central mediator of cell size and shape with clear ramifications for cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and remodeling. To understand how this is ultimately achieved, we will first describe the upstream extracellular signals that lead to ERK activation in the heart.

3. Sensing of Extracellular Stimuli That Modulate ERK1/2 Activity in Cardiomyocytes

As the name “extracellular signal-regulated kinase” suggests, ERK is a key intracellular transducer of extracellular signals. Therefore, it is essential to discuss how the extracellular signals are parlayed to elicit cellular changes. At the interface between the extracellular milieu and ERK, there are three major classes of membrane receptors: integrins, G-protein-coupled receptors, and tyrosine kinase receptors. Ultimately, ERK is the coordinator of multiple signaling events that are initiated by the receptors mentioned above, and we will therefore describe the main characteristics of these cellular pathways.

3.1. Integrins

The first of the three types of membrane-bound receptors that modulate ERK signaling in cardiomyocytes to be discussed are the integrins, which are a large class of structurally related proteins that have been shown to be integral to many cellular processes. A key characteristic of these receptors is their involvement in mechanotransduction, which consists of sensing the mechanical deformation of structural elements, including the extracellular matrix (ECM) and intracellular cytoskeletal components, and converting these changes into a signal that can alter cell morphology and behavior. The cellular response to stretch is highly linked to cardiac hypertrophy, highlighting the importance of integrins in the heart. As pressure increases in the heart, cardiomyocytes become elongated, and components of the ECM and cytoskeleton are mechanically altered. This change in structure is partially relayed to the nucleus via integrins.
While integrins have been extensively studied in many different cellular contexts, the majority of studies in cardiomyocytes that focus on integrin-dependent regulation of ERK signaling has described hypertrophy and cell survival as the main downstream cellular responses. In cultured adult feline cardiomyocytes, the activation of beta 3 integrins using RGD (Arg-Gly-Asp)-containing peptides led to hypertrophy through the regulation of p70S6 kinase (S6K1) and activation of ERK [69]. Later, in 2005, an Italian group linked integrin signaling to ERK-mediated cardiac hypertrophy, where they showed that the overexpression of an integrin binding protein, melusin, was protective by inducing adaptive hypertrophic remodeling following pressure overload-induced heart failure in transgenic mice. The authors noted that multiple signaling pathways were activated, including ERK, but the specific contribution of ERK to this response was not tested, for instance, through the use of an ERK inhibitor [70]. Another direct link between integrin signaling and hypertrophy is a study that induced hypertrophy in rat cardiomyocytes using endothelin-1 (ET-1) and showed that under these conditions, beta 1 integrin expression and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production are increased. Upon blockade of integrin signaling, the hypertrophic response to ET-1 was blunted, indicating a critical role for integrins in this response. Interestingly, it was shown that ROS-induced ERK activation is responsible for the upregulation of beta 1 integrin, implying that in this particular case, ERK activation was not a consequence of beta 1 integrin upregulation, but rather, the cause [71]. More recently, Nakamura et al. highlighted a connection between integrin signaling and ERK activation in cardiomyocytes using a transgenic mouse with knock out of a disintegrin and metalloprotease 12 (ADAM12). Here, they showed that loss of ADAM12 increased beta 1 integrin abundance with concomitant increase in ERK activation, although the authors did not assess if the activation of ERK was directly related to the upregulation of beta 1 integrin [72]. Similarly, the expression of microfibrillar associated protein 4 (MFAP4), another ECM protein, has been shown to directly activate RGD-binding integrin signaling in cardiomyocytes and favor adaptation to stress [73].
There are also several papers that focused specifically on the role of integrins in ERK activation during stretch of cardiomyocytes. The earliest of these papers explored the connection between brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and cardiomyocyte stretch in vitro, which is a situation in which BNP and ERK are activated. These authors utilized two integrin binding proteins, RGD peptides and fibronectin, to explore how integrins are involved in the upregulation of BNP in response to stretch. After showing that treatment with these proteins induces BNP similar to stretch, they blocked several integrin isoforms (beta1, beta3, and alpha5beta5) and found that stretch-induced BNP expression in cardiomyocytes was indeed integrin-dependent [74]. This critical role for integrins in detecting mechanical changes to the cell is further underscored by the finding that stretch of neonatal rat ventricular cardiomyocytes activates ERK via beta 1 integrin [75]. Together, these findings highlight a critical role for integrin signaling in detecting changes to the mechanical structure of cardiomyocytes during hypertrophy and stretching.
Overall, the above findings provide strong evidence to support the idea that integrin-induced ERK activation is critical to the maintenance of cardiomyocyte homeostasis. Although in many of these cases, different compounds were used in the presence of different stressors, one central theme emerged: without integrin signaling, the cardiomyocyte would be unable to respond to cardiac stress.

3.2. G-Protein-Coupled Receptors

The second of the three receptor types to be discussed are the GPCRs, which are a family of membrane bound receptors, each of which contain an N-terminal extracellular domain, seven transmembrane a-helices, and a C-terminal cytoplasmic domain. Critical regulators of cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and function, such as endothelin I, angiotensin II, isoproterenol, lysophosphatidic acid, and phenylephrine, act through GPCRs, greatly underscoring the importance of these ERK-activating receptors in the heart [76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83]. A wide range of mechanisms for how GPCR activation can modulate ERK activation have been highlighted, such as a requirement for ROS [76,84], protein kinase C [80], cAMP and PKA [81], and even RTK transactivation [80]. The sheer breadth of potential GPCR activators and their many downstream effectors described here is just barely indicative of the complexity of these pathways and their regulation. Adding to this complexity is that multiple G protein isoforms can be expressed in different conditions, and any one of those individual g protein subunits could be differentially regulated, greatly influencing what effectors are responsible to carry the signal forward. There are many studies that have focused on studying the differential contributions by individual G protein subunits and their isoforms, frequently through the use of genetically engineered cells or animals. For instance, several groups have examined hypertrophic effects attributed specifically to the Gaq subunit via its specific activation or overexpression, showing that its activation alone is sufficient to produce a robust hypertrophic phenotype with concomitant ERK activation that leads to heart failure [85,86,87,88]. There are three studies of note that have pointed out that the active GTP-bound alpha subunit is not the only potential effector of GPCR activation. Although one study was focused on the beta/gamma subunit released by the Gs alpha subunit [89] and the other two focused on that which was released by the Gq alpha subunit [87,90], all three concluded that the released beta/gamma subunit is capable of binding to ERK, modulating its activity. It is lastly worth mentioning proteins that contain regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) domains, which are involved in reducing the effect of GPCR activation. Upon the introduction of the RGS domain containing proteins to cardiomyocytes, there is a block in ERK activation, and the response to hypertrophic stimuli is reduced [91,92]. The opposite outcome occurs when RGS signaling is reduced and Gq-mediated ERK activation is increased [93]. Other groups have assessed the role of specific g protein alpha subunit isoforms in RGS mediated ERK activation [94] as well as the role of different RGS domains in activating ERK [95]. These results indicate that RGS protein domains may be viable targets in the treatment of diseases that involve dysregulated hypertrophic responses, such as heart failure. Regardless of the method used to induce hypertrophy and the specific mechanism that ultimately leads to its development, there is a large body of evidence supporting the notion that GPCR-induced activation of ERK is absolutely essential to maintaining the proper hypertrophic response within cardiomyocytes.
Finally, because adrenergic receptors (AR) are GPCRs, several studies have specifically focused on adrenergic signaling and its effect on ERK activation, many of which have been described above. Two more worth noting have focused on the subcellular localization of either ERK or the receptors, finding that alpha1AR activation alters the localization of active ERK to caveolae in a fashion not dissimilar from that described for the S1P receptor above [96], and that alpha1AR compartmentalization itself can regulate ERK activation [97]. These two studies highlight yet another intricate form of regulation for the activation of ERK by GPCRs in cardiomyocytes and further underscore the sheer complexity of signal transduction events that occur between GPCR stimulation and eventual activation of ERK, with more undoubtedly yet to be uncovered.

3.3. Receptor Tyrosine Kinases

In addition to integrins and G-protein coupled receptors, receptor tyrosine kinases (RTK) are critical mediators in the process by which cells detect extracellular signals, convert the signals into a change in ERK signaling, and modulate cellular processes in response. Classically, RTKs were discovered as being receptors for growth factors that play a role in cellular proliferation, with the initial connection between tyrosine phosphorylation and this outcome found during addition of epidermal growth factor (EGF) to epidermal cells [98], and, later, insulin to lymphocytes [99] and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) to glial cells and fibroblasts [100]. Since then, many more RTKs have been identified and studied, many of which are involved in processes beyond just proliferation. Despite several signaling cascades that can originate upon RTKs activation, the MAPK cascade is certainly recognized as an important downstream mediator of these receptors. We will particularly focus our discussion on key studies reporting RTK-dependent ERK activation in cardiomyocytes.
Of the studies that focused on the role of RTKs in the activation of ERK during cardiac hypertrophy, the majority utilized primary cultured rat cardiomyocytes to test crosstalk between GPCRs and RTKs. Yamazaki and colleagues explored the hypertrophic effect of endothelin-1 and noted an RTK’s contribution to endothelin-driven and ERK-dependent cardiomyocyte hypertrophy [79]. Another study assessed the contribution of PDGF RTK as a mediator of cardiomyocyte hypertrophy downstream of another GPCR activator, angiotensin II, where ERK activation led to phosphorylation of the PDGF receptor, showing another example of RTK-GPCR crosstalk for coordination of cardiomyocyte growth [77]. Further building upon the concept of crosstalk between GPCRs and RTKs is the study by Carrasco et al., which utilized cultured rat cardiomyocytes to assess how G proteins are critical to the induction of hypertrophy by insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) [101]. IGF-1 had previously been shown to activate ERK through the IGF-1R, which is an RTK. Upon the blockade of G-protein signaling using pertussis toxin or BARKct, ERK activation by IGF-1 treatment was abolished, indicating an essential role for the crosstalk between RTKs and G-proteins in the activation of ERK in cardiomyocytes by IGF-1 [101]. A testament to the critical role for RTK signaling in cardiac hypertrophy is the finding by Yu et al. that the activation of ERK by RTKs is conserved, even in the drosophila heart [102]. Using transgenic flies, the authors showed how overexpression of the RTK EGFR led to cardiac hypertrophy and how this effect was prevented by blocking ERK activation [102]. Together, these results highlight a role for EGFR activation and subsequent signaling through ERK in the development of cardiac hypertrophy.
RTKs have been greatly studied since their initial discovery, with papers on the topic reaching into the tens of thousands. Despite this, knowledge of the role that they play in transmitting signals to ERK within the cardiomyocyte is severely lacking. The studies that have focused on this have shown that RTK signaling in cardiomyocytes is clearly critical to the development of hypertrophy as well as in the defense against stress, as evidenced by the requirement for RTK and ERK activation in each context examined thus far. Although RTK signaling is not usually the sole contributor to the regulation of a specific cellular process, be it hypertrophy, apoptosis, or proliferation, its contribution to the maintenance of cardiomyocyte homeostasis cannot be understated.

4. Integration of ERK1/2 Signaling for Cardiomyocyte Homeostasis and Stress Responses

As discussed above, receptor signals are transduced to beget cardiac ramifications. Indeed, pressure overload stimulates ERK activity by way of integrins and GPCRs [69,70,74,75,92]. RTKs are also essential to cardiac homeostasis and stress response [77,79,101,102,103,104,105,106]. Numerous studies have explored the roles of canonical ERK module components in both physiological and pathological hypertrophy with clear evidence of the impact of ERK activation for regulation of gene expression. Indeed, several transcription factors, such as archetypical effectors Elk-1 [53] and Ets1 [55], have been identified downstream of ERK in the cardiomyocyte. The direct phosphorylation of transcription factor GATA4 at serine 105 has been identified as necessary to hypertrophic response to pressure overload or adrenergic stimulation by phenylephrine [107,108], where phosphorylation may be facilitated by either ERK or p38 [108]. Genetic ablation of GATA4 precludes hypertrophy, and this phenotype was not found to be rescued in activated MEK1 transgenic mice, suggesting GATA4 as a critical mediator of the MEK1–ERK pathway in the heart [108]. Recently, ERK effector RSK3 was identified to phosphorylate another transcription regulator, serum-responsive factor (SRF), where downstream signaling modulates cardiomyocyte growth in width, which is essential to concentric hypertrophy [12]. Recent reports also indicate crosstalk between ERK and transcription factor STAT3 signaling to mediate cardioprotection in myocytes treated with doxorubicin, again highlighting the importance of the ERK pathway for the integration of stress responses in the heart [109]. Below, we will describe the key studies that definitively linked ERK and its regulation to the control of cardiomyocyte size, shape, and function.

4.1. Modulation of ERK Kinase Cascade in Cardiomyocyte

Upstream of ERK, RAF is essential to hypertrophic responses, and dominant negative RAF mice subjected to pressure overload via transverse aortic constriction fail to develop adaptive hypertrophy and show increased cardiomyocyte death even without stress [110]. RAF’s target MEK has also extensively been studied in the heart. Mice overexpressing MEK1 showed an increase in cardiac wall thickness and improved cardiac function, which correlated to an increase in ERK phosphorylation and total ERK levels [111]. These mice were also less prone to apoptosis induced by ischemia/reperfusion [112]. Importantly, transgenic mice with constitutively active ERK also show increased ventricular contractility under pressure overload [6]. In loss-of-function studies, ERK2 ablation was observed to be lethal and heterozygosity significantly reduced fractional shortening following transverse aortic constriction-induced pressure overload compared to WT mice. ERK1-null mice showed no significant change in hypertrophy but trended toward reduced cardiac function [113]. These data suggest a role for ERK in concentric hypertrophy. To better understand the role of ERK signaling in balancing hypertrophy, a study by Kehat and colleagues found that while single knockout showed no phenotype at baseline, double knockout elicited cardiomyocyte elongation to yield eccentric hypertrophy, suggesting a role for ERK1/2 signaling in maintaining a physiological cardiomyocyte geometry [114]. Cardiomyocytes from these mice were able to undergo hypertrophic growth in width upon angiotensin II or phenylephrine administration, suggesting that neurohormonal stimulation can at least in part bypass ERK signaling despite the requirement for ERK to prevent eccentric cardiomyocyte remodeling [114]. These data have been corroborated by pressure overload studies, where upon transverse aortic constriction, mice show an initial increase in ERK phosphorylation, which decreases with functional decline of the heart [115]. In sum, these data suggest a role for ERK in hypertrophy, particularly in preventing eccentric hypertrophy in response to pressure overload stress. Keeping in mind the proven importance of ERK for cardiac homeostasis, we will next describe how scaffold proteins can regulate its activation.

4.2. Scaffolds in Regulation of ERK Signaling in the Heart

Specialized scaffold proteins function to spatially and temporally regulate the transduced ERK signal downstream of all main ERK-activating receptors in cardiomyocytes (Figure 1). Downstream of RTK receptors, biologically inactive Ras-GDP requires conversion to Ras-GTP via guanine exchange factors (GEFs) to induce conformational change and enzymatic activity. Indeed, exchange factor son-of-sevenless (SOS) is recruited to RTKs to facilitate this exchange [116]. Scaffold protein Shoc2 has been identified as critical to Ras activation and vital to cardiac development, where ablation yields severe cardiac defects and embryonic lethality [117]. Moreover, a Shoc2 mutation has been identified in Noonan-like diseases, cementing a role for this scaffold in heart development [118]. Overall, both Shoc2 and SOS appeared critical for the RTK-mediated ERK cascade. Additionally, ErbB2-interacting protein (Erbin) has been identified as an antagonist of RTK Erb2 downstream activity, where null mice exhibit pathological hypertrophy and heart failure following pressure overload [119].
Scaffold proteins also play an integral role in integrin signal propagation. Indeed, integrin-binding chaperone protein melusin is essential to adaptive hypertrophy, where expression is upregulated in response to mechanical overload stress [120]. Melusin-null mice show reduced cardiac contractility and dilated cardiomyopathy following pressure overload [121]. Contrarily, the overexpression of melusin has been shown cardioprotective following pressure overload and, following coronary ligation, it reduces the extent of cardiac damage through an enhanced phosphorylation of ERK [70]. Another scaffold protein identified for integrins is motif-containing GTPase-activating protein 1 (IQGAP1), which has roles in cell adhesion and cytoskeletal organization. IQGAP1-null mice more quickly develop eccentric hypertrophy and reduced cardiac contractility due to impaired ERK signaling [122]. Melusin, IQGAP1, and Raf-MEK1/2-ERK1/2 have been observed to coprecipitate in complex with FAK (focal adhesion kinase), suggesting the synergism of these scaffolds to yield integrin-mediated ERK activity. Interestingly, the GTPases attributed to IQGAP1 and canonical ERK signaling were not detected in the complex, suggesting that the interaction does not involve Ras activation [123]. While ERK activity independent of Ras has been previously reported [124], the details of Raf activation through this cascade in the cardiomyocyte still need be elucidated.
For GPCRs, data suggest a role for scaffold β-arrestin in mediating GPCR crosstalk in the ERK module following specific GPCR binding [125]. G-protein-independent activation of beta1AR by β-arrestin has been observed and was found to be cardioprotective. Interestingly, this conferred protection was by way of RTK EGFR [126], suggesting crosstalk between the GPCR and RTK routes. Indeed, RTK agonist Erbin has also been identified as an antagonist to GPCR beta2AR [127].
Further scaffolds have been identified among myofilament-associated proteins four and a half LIM domain protein-1 (FHL1) [128] and ankyrin repeat domain (ANKRD1) [129], which play a role in sarcomeric ERK signaling. These proteins also interact with GATA4, reinforcing the concept of ERK-mediated regulation of gene expression where the balance between cytoplasmic and nuclear ERK can control the nuclear translocation of the transcription factor GATA4 and therefore impact transcription [130,131]. Indeed, loss-of-function studies with ANKRD1 and FHL1 show blunted hypertrophic response. ANKRD1 has been shown to recruit GATA4 and localize to the sarcomere with ERK1/2, after which ANKRD1 nuclear translocation begets the upregulation of hypertrophic genes [129]. As the duration of ERK activation is regulated by phosphatases, we will now describe this important step of signal termination.

4.3. Impact of Cardiac ERK Signal Termination by Phosphatases

ERK signaling is further regulated by specialized phosphatases. Indeed, the overexpression of DUSP1 has been observed to suppress MAPK signaling to blunt hypertrophy following pressure overload [132]. Dual specificity kinase 6 (DUSP6) has been shown to specifically dephosphorylate cytoplasmic ERK1/2 in vitro, while DUSP5 has also been identified as a negative regulator of nuclear ERK signaling [113,133]. A recent study by Liu and colleagues elucidated a role for DUSP8 in cardiomyocyte growth, where overexpression resulted in eccentric remodeling and ventricular dilation due to myocyte lengthening and myocardial thinning. In DUSP8-null hearts subjected to pathological stress, ERK1/2 signaling was upregulated. Given that other MAPK modules were relatively unaffected, DUSP8 was deemed specific to the ERK compartment [134]. Other DUSPs have been identified to play less specific roles in the ERK and other MAPK modules. A recent study by Zhao and colleagues implicated DUSP26 in cardiac hypertrophy by modulating p38 and JNK signaling [135]. While ERK signaling was found unaffected, these data illustrate complex crosstalk between the MAPK modules and their regulatory components. Additional phosphatases play a role in regulating ERK signaling. Indeed, Src homology 2 domain containing tyrosine phosphatase 2 (SHP2) has also been identified as integral to physiological ERK signaling, where deletion elicits dilated cardiomyopathy [13]. Although future studies will be needed to further address phosphatase-specificity in ERK signaling, their role in regulating the cardiac landscape cannot be overstated. The ERK cascade, as discussed above, requires synergism between several components including scaffold proteins and phosphatases to transduce a membrane signal and elicit controlled cardiomyocyte hypertrophic changes (Figure 1).

4.4. ERK in Heart Failure Onset and Progression

The importance of ERK is clearly demonstrated by the consequences of aberrant ERK signaling for cardiac function in humans. The ERK1/2 module has been implicated in heart failure and other diseases linked to pathological hypertrophy. An autophosphorylation of ERK1 at Threonine 188 (T188) was discovered by Lorenz and colleagues to induce maladaptive hypertrophy in a pressure overload mouse model and in failing human hearts [87]. Another study found enhanced T188 phosphorylation in patients with rapid course aortic valve stenosis [136]. This modification was found to exert spatial regulation through nuclear localization of ERK to activate hypertrophic targets Elk1, MSK1, and c-Myc [136]. Interestingly, T188 does not influence kinase activity, which is facilitated through the phosphorylation of T183 and T185, but it solely impacts nuclear translocation. Thus, significant hypertrophy is only observed when both phosphorylations occur, as both nuclear and cytoplasmic events trigger cellular consequences [136]. Further, data suggest that the phosphorylation of T188 is requisite to nuclear translocation of ERK, therefore making the residue a promising site for therapeutic modulation. Indeed, T188A mutation does not impact physiological cardiac growth, suggesting that intervention would solely impact pathological hypertrophy [136]. It was recently shown that T188 autophosphorylation requires ERK–ERK interaction and that T188 is essential to nuclear ERK accumulation [137]. In line with the discussed findings, continuous pressure overload in vivo can induce a transition from adaptive to maladaptive hypertrophic remodeling, primarily by way of angiotensin II (Ang II) binding to GPCR AT1R. Ang II induces vasoconstriction, thus causing hypertension at high levels to cause cardiac aberration. High Ang II levels correlate to hypertrophic signaling and myocardial infraction [138,139]. Indeed, evidence suggests that angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors slow heart failure progression and improve hemodynamics [140]. Though some molecular details remain unknown regarding the mechanism for ACE inhibition, the above studies illustrate an inextricable link between ERK signaling and hypertrophy.
Alteration in ERK activity has also been linked to hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Ras mRNA expression has been shown to positively correlate to the severity of hypertrophy in HCM [141]. Furthermore, mutations in the ERK signaling cascade occur in congenital diseases called RASopathies. Among other phenotypes, these beget cardiac defects, where two specific disorders—Costello and LEOPARD syndromes—often involve HCM [142]. In mice expressing Noonan syndrome-associated mutated RAF-1 (L613V), eccentric hypertrophy and decompensation following TAC have been observed. Interestingly, treatment with MEK inhibitor Mirdametinib normalized these cardiac defects, suggesting a role for aberrant ERK signaling in HCM development [143]. Cardiomyocytes derived from LEOPARD patient induced pluripotent stem cells show higher sarcomeric organization and increased size, correlating to increased hypertrophy [144]. Specifically, germline mutations to B-Raf in Noonan, LEOPARD, and cardiofaciocutaneous syndromes yield atrial–septal defects and pulmonary stenosis [145]. B-Raf plays an integral role in cardiac homeostasis, as evidenced by the impairment of angiogenesis and increased myocyte apoptosis with B-Raf and MEK inhibition [146]. While molecular insights still require elucidation, it has been proposed that the administration of such inhibitors may elicit adverse cardiovascular outcomes by way of increased cAMP and PKA activity, thus upregulating K+ channel phosphorylation. As a result, myocardial repolarization is downregulated [147]. While such inhibitors have been indicated for the treatment of cancers, the data indicate a need to understand their cardiotoxicity and systemic impacts.

4.5. Cardiac Ramifications of Therapeutic ERK Inhibition

The development of drugs that selectively inhibit B-Raf for cancer therapy have been the subject of intense focus in recent years, with numerous clinical trials yielding several FDA-approved treatments. Certain cancers, such as melanoma, are associated with an activating mutation in B-Raf, thus upregulating downstream ERK signaling [148]. As discussed, the administration of such therapeutics can elicit adverse cardiovascular side effects. Further, several clinical trials implement combination therapy, whereby multiple drugs are dispensed to target various MAPK signaling components, increasing the potential for additional deleterious cardiac effects. This combinatorial approach is necessary because most patients receiving monotherapy treatment develop a resistance to the drug through compensatory upregulation of MEK, which can be relieved via MEK inhibitor treatment [149].
Three FDA-approved Raf inhibitors are dabrafenib, vemurafenib, and encorafenib, each of which has been noted to affect the heart [150,151,152]. Numerous clinical trials have tested the efficacy of these drugs, including COMBI-d and COMBI-v [150], coBRIM [151], and COLUMBUS [152]. The most common adverse event related to cardiovascular homeostasis noted in these studies is hypertension, with the incidence of all-grade hypertension reaching as high as 29% of all study participants in the COMBI trials [150], but decreased ejection fraction [150,151,152], QT prolongation [151,152], peripheral edema [150,151,152], and increased blood creatine kinase [151,152] have also been noted. Importantly, the experimental design of the coBRIM and COLUMBUS trials highlighted that the combination of Raf and MEK inhibitors frequently resulted in worsened cardiac outcomes than Raf inhibitor monotherapy alone. Using these two trials as an example in the case of hypertension, treatment with Raf inhibitor alone resulted in 8.1% [151] and 5.7% [152] of patients developing hypertension, respectively. When combining the same Raf inhibitor with an MEK inhibitor, these incidences jump to 15.8% [151] and 10.9% [152], highlighting an important drawback to combining these drugs. Taken together, this evidence makes it clear that the use of Raf and MEK inhibitors in the treatment of cancer must be carried out while paying careful attention to their effect on cardiac homeostasis.

5. Conclusions

Cardiac hypertrophy occurs in response to both physiological and pathological stimuli, where extracellular factor-mediated signal transduction results in cellular changes to cardiomyocytes. As an intracellular mediator of extracellular signals, ERK activation has been undoubtedly proven critical for the heart. Indeed, the above studies illustrate the involvement of ERK signaling in cardiomyocyte homeostasis and cardiac stress responses. Several studies have identified the assembly of macrocomplexes containing upstream ERK effectors as a means to modulate signal strength and duration [153]. Thus, greater understanding of protein–protein dynamics within the cardiac ERK module may expand our current understanding of ERK’s role in hypertrophic responses [154,155,156,157,158]. Further, profiling of the crosstalk between ERK, other MAPK signaling compartments, and additional cellular pathways are necessary to establishing potential therapeutic targets for cardiac pathologies. Nonetheless, ERK signaling is inseparable from cardiac responses and provides a springboard for exciting studies to be done.

Funding

This research was funded by the NIH under Grants [number HL136951 and HL154001] to FA.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study did not involve Institutional Review Board protocols and did not generate new datasets.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

This study did not involve Institutional Review Board protocols and did not generate new datasets.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bonnans, C.; Chou, J.; Werb, Z. Remodelling the extracellular matrix in development and disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2014, 15, 786–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Münch, J.; Abdelilah-Seyfried, S. Sensing and Responding of Cardiomyocytes to Changes of Tissue Stiffness in the Diseased Heart. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 9, 403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Brancaccio, M.; Hirsch, E.; Notte, A.; Selvetella, G.; Lembo, G.; Tarone, G. Integrin signalling: The tug-of-war in heart hypertrophy. Cardiovasc. Res. 2006, 70, 422–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Delcourt, N.; Bockaert, J.; Marin, P. GPCR-jacking: From a new route in RTK signalling to a new concept in GPCR activation. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2007, 28, 602–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Lavoie, H.; Gagnon, J.; Therrien, M. ERK signalling: A master regulator of cell behaviour, life and fate. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2020, 21, 607–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mutlak, M.; Schlesinger-Laufer, M.; Haas, T.; Shofti, R.; Ballan, N.; Lewis, Y.E.; Zuler, M.; Zohar, Y.; Caspi, L.H.; Kehat, I. Extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) activation preserves cardiac function in pressure overload induced hypertrophy. Int. J. Cardiol. 2018, 270, 204–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhang, W.; Liu, H.T. MAPK signal pathways in the regulation of cell proliferation in mammalian cells. Cell Res. 2002, 12, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Senger, K.; Pham, V.C.; Varfolomeev, E.; Hackney, J.A.; Corzo, C.A.; Collier, J.; Lau, V.W.C.; Huang, Z.; Hamidzhadeh, K.; Caplazi, P.; et al. The kinase TPL2 activates ERK and p38 signaling to promote neutrophilic inflammation. Sci. Signal. 2017, 10, eaah4273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fritz, A.; Brayer, K.J.; McCormick, N.; Adams, D.G.; Wadzinski, B.E.; Vaillancourt, R.R. Phosphorylation of Serine 526 Is Required for MEKK3 Activity, and Association with 14-3-3 Blocks Dephosphorylation. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 6236–6245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Marshall, C.J. MAP kinase kinase kinase, MAP kinase kinase and MAP kinase. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 1994, 4, 82–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Roskoski, R., Jr. Targeting ERK1/2 protein-serine/threonine kinases in human cancers. Pharmacol. Res. 2019, 142, 151–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, J.; Tan, Y.; Passariello, C.L.; Martinez, E.C.; Kritzer, M.D.; Li, X.; Li, X.; Li, Y.; Yu, Q.; Ohgi, K.; et al. Signalosome-Regulated Serum Response Factor Phosphorylation Determining Myocyte Growth in Width Versus Length as a Therapeutic Target for Heart Failure. Circulation 2020, 142, 2138–2154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kontaridis, M.I.; Yang, W.; Bence, K.K.; Cullen, D.; Wang, B.; Bodyak, N.; Ke, Q.; Hinek, A.; Kang, P.M.; Liao, R.; et al. Deletion of Ptpn11 (Shp2) in Cardiomyocytes Causes Dilated Cardiomyopathy via Effects on the Extracellular Signal–Regulated Kinase/Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase and RhoA Signaling Pathways. Circulation 2008, 117, 1423–1435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Farooq, A.; Zhou, M.-M. Structure and regulation of MAPK phosphatases. Cell. Signal. 2004, 16, 769–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Buffet, C.; Hecale-Perlemoine, K.; Bricaire, L.; Dumont, F.; Baudry, C.; Tissier, F.; Bertherat, J.; Cochand-Priollet, B.; Raffin-Sanson, M.-L.; Cormier, F.; et al. DUSP5 and DUSP6, two ERK specific phosphatases, are markers of a higher MAPK signaling activation in BRAF mutated thyroid cancers. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0184861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Urness, L.D.; Li, C.; Wang, X.; Mansour, S.L. Expression of ERK signaling inhibitorsDusp6, Dusp7, andDusp9 during mouse ear development. Dev. Dyn. 2008, 237, 163–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Ferguson, B.S.; Nam, H.; Stephens, J.M.; Morrison, R.F. Mitogen-Dependent Regulation of DUSP1 Governs ERK and p38 Signaling During Early 3T3-L1 Adipocyte Differentiation. J. Cell. Physiol. 2016, 231, 1562–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Kim, S.Y.; Han, Y.M.; Oh, M. DUSP4 regulates neuronal differentiation and calcium homeostasis by modulating ERK1/2 phosphorylation. Stem Cells Dev. 2015, 24, 686–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Fey, D.; Croucher, D.R.; Kolch, W.; Kholodenko, B.N. Crosstalk and Signaling Switches in Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Cascades. Front. Physiol. 2012, 3, 355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Dinsmore, C.J.; Soriano, P. MAPK and PI3K signaling: At the crossroads of neural crest development. Dev. Biol. 2018, 444 (Suppl. 1), S79–S97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ahmed, K.M.; Dong, S.; Fan, M.; Li, J.J. Nuclear factor-kappaB p65 inhibits mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway in radioresistant breast cancer cells. Mol. Cancer Res. 2006, 4, 945–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Mebratu, Y.; Tesfaigzi, Y. How ERK1/2 activation controls cell proliferation and cell death: Is subcellular localization the answer? Cell Cycle 2009, 8, 1168–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Casar, B.; Pinto, A.; Crespo, P. Essential Role of ERK Dimers in the Activation of Cytoplasmic but Not Nuclear Substrates by ERK-Scaffold Complexes. Mol. Cell 2008, 31, 708–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Koga, Y.; Tsurumaki, H.; Aoki-Saito, H.; Sato, M.; Yatomi, M.; Takehara, K.; Hisada, T. Roles of Cyclic AMP Response Element Binding Activation in the ERK1/2 and p38 MAPK Signalling Pathway in Central Nervous System, Cardiovascular System, Osteoclast Differentiation and Mucin and Cytokine Production. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Moens, U.; Kostenko, S.; Sveinbjørnsson, B. The Role of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase-Activated Protein Kinases (MAPKAPKs) in Inflammation. Genes 2013, 4, 101–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Ünal, E.B.; Uhlitz, F.; Blüthgen, N. A compendium of ERK targets. FEBS Lett. 2017, 591, 2607–2615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Glading, A.; Bodnar, R.J.; Reynolds, I.J.; Shiraha, H.; Satish, L.; Potter, D.A.; Blair, H.C.; Wells, A. Epidermal growth factor activates m-calpain (calpain II), at least in part, by extracellular signal-regulated kinase-mediated phosphorylation. Mol. Cell Biol. 2004, 24, 2499–2512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Shao, H.; Chou, J.; Baty, C.J.; Burke, N.A.; Watkins, S.C.; Stolz, D.B.; Wells, A. Spatial Localization of m-Calpain to the Plasma Membrane by Phosphoinositide Biphosphate Binding during Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mediated Activation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2006, 26, 5481–5496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Hornbeck, P.V.; Kornhauser, J.M.; Tkachev, S.; Zhang, B.; Skrzypek, E.; Murray, B.; Latham, V.; Sullivan, M. PhosphoSitePlus: A comprehensive resource for investigating the structure and function of experimentally determined post-translational modifications in man and mouse. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 40, D261–D270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Oh, H.; Jung, H.Y.; Kim, J.; Bae, Y.S. Phosphorylation of serine282 in NADPH oxidase activator 1 by Erk desensitizes EGF-induced ROS generation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2010, 394, 691–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lin, X.; Nelson, P.J.; Gelman, I.H. SSeCKS, a Major Protein Kinase C Substrate with Tumor Suppressor Activity, Regulates G1→S Progression by Controlling the Expression and Cellular Compartmentalization of Cyclin D. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2000, 20, 7259–7272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Xue, L.; Wang, P.; Cao, P.; Zhu, J.-K.; Tao, W.A. Identification of Extracellular Signal-regulated Kinase 1 (ERK1) Direct Substrates using Stable Isotope Labeled Kinase Assay-Linked Phosphoproteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2014, 13, 3199–3210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Stuart, S.A.; Houel, S.; Lee, T.; Wang, N.; Old, W.M.; Ahn, N.G. A Phosphoproteomic Comparison of B-RAFV600E and MKK1/2 Inhibitors in Melanoma Cells. Mol. Cell Proteom. 2015, 14, 1599–1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Carlson, S.M.; Chouinard, C.R.; Labadorf, A.; Lam, C.J.; Schmelzle, K.; Fraenkel, E.; White, F.M. Large-Scale Discovery of ERK2 Substrates Identifies ERK-Mediated Transcriptional Regulation by ETV3. Sci. Signal. 2011, 4, rs11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Wigge, P.; Köhler, K.; Vallis, Y.; Doyle, C.A.; Owen, D.; Hunt, S.P.; McMahon, H.T. Amphiphysin Heterodimers: Potential Role in Clathrin-mediated Endocytosis. Mol. Biol. Cell 1997, 8, 2003–2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Yang, H.; Wan, Z.; Huang, C.; Yin, H.; Song, D. AMPH-1 is a tumor suppressor of lung cancer by inhibiting Ras-Raf-MEK-ERK signal pathway. Lasers Med. Sci. 2019, 34, 473–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Seger, R.; Krebs, E.G. The MAPK signaling cascade. FASEB J. 1995, 9, 726–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Ohishi, T.; Yoshida, H.; Katori, M.; Migita, T.; Muramatsu, Y.; Miyake, M.; Ishikawa, Y.; Saiura, A.; Iemura, S.-I.; Natsume, T.; et al. Tankyrase-Binding Protein TNKS1BP1 Regulates Actin Cytoskeleton Rearrangement and Cancer Cell Invasion. Cancer Res. 2017, 77, 2328–2338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Chiang, P.-Y.; Shen, Y.-F.; Su, Y.-L.; Kao, C.-H.; Lin, N.-Y.; Hsu, P.-H.; Tsai, M.-D.; Wang, S.-C.; Chang, G.-D.; Lee, S.-C.; et al. Phosphorylation of mRNA Decapping Protein Dcp1a by the ERK Signaling Pathway during Early Differentiation of 3T3-L1 Preadipocytes. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e61697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Kim, H.D.; Lee, J.Y.; Kim, J. Erk phosphorylates threonine 42 residue of ribosomal protein S3. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2005, 333, 110–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hauge, C.; Frödin, M. RSK and MSK in MAP kinase signalling. J. Cell Sci. 2006, 119, 3021–3023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Pitson, S.M.; Moretti, P.A.; Zebol, J.R.; Lynn, H.E.; Xia, P.; Vadas, M.A.; Wattenberg, B.W. Activation of sphingosine kinase 1 by ERK1/2-mediated phosphorylation. Embo J. 2003, 22, 5491–5500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Zhang, Y.; Cho, Y.-Y.; Petersen, B.L.; Zhu, F.; Dong, Z. Evidence of STAT1 phosphorylation modulated by MAPKs, MEK1 and MSK1. Carcinogenesis 2004, 25, 1165–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Zhang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Liu, Z.; Lai, R. ERK is a negative feedback regulator for IFN-γ/STAT1 signaling by promoting STAT1 ubiquitination. BMC Cancer 2018, 18, 613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Pozo-Guisado, E.; Campbell, D.G.; Deak, M.; Alvarez-Barrientos, A.; Morrice, N.A.; Alvarez, I.S.; Alessi, D.R.; Martín-Romero, F.J. Phosphorylation of STIM1 at ERK1/2 target sites modulates store-operated calcium entry. J. Cell Sci. 2010, 123, 3084–3093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Yeh, P.Y.; Chuang, S.-E.; Yeh, K.-H.; Song, Y.C.; Chang, L.L.-Y.; Cheng, A.-L. Phosphorylation of p53 on Thr55 by ERK2 is necessary for doxorubicin-induced p53 activation and cell death. Oncogene 2004, 23, 3580–3588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Lee, I.H.; Lim, H.J.; Yoon, S.; Seong, J.K.; Bae, D.S.; Rhee, S.G.; Bae, Y.S. Ahnak Protein Activates Protein Kinase C (PKC) through Dissociation of the PKC-Protein Phosphatase 2A Complex. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 6312–6320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Shtivelman, E.; Bishop, J.M. The human gene AHNAK encodes a large phosphoprotein located primarily in the nucleus. J. Cell Biol. 1993, 120, 625–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Gnad, F.; Doll, S.; Song, K.; Stokes, M.P.; Moffat, J.; Liu, B.; Arnott, D.; Wallin, J.; Friedman, L.S.; Hatzivassiliou, G.; et al. Phosphoproteome analysis of the MAPK pathway reveals previously undetected feedback mechanisms. Proteomics 2016, 16, 1998–2004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kubiniok, P.; Lavoie, H.; Therrien, M.; Thibault, P. Time-resolved Phosphoproteome Analysis of Paradoxical RAF Activation Reveals Novel Targets of ERK. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2017, 16, 663–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Ouwens, D.M.; de Ruiter, N.D.; van der Zon, G.C.; Carter, A.P.; Schouten, J.; van der Burgt, C.; Kooistra, K.; Bos, J.L.; Maassen, J.A.; van Dam, H. Growth factors can activate ATF2 via a two-step mechanism: Phosphorylation of Thr71 through the Ras-MEK-ERK pathway and of Thr69 through RalGDS-Src-p38. Embo J. 2002, 21, 3782–3793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Hanlon, M.; Sturgill, T.W.; Sealy, L. ERK2- and p90(Rsk2)-dependent pathways regulate the CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein-beta interaction with serum response factor. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 38449–38456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Babu, G.J.; Lalli, J.M.; Sussman, M.A.; Sadoshima, J.-I.; Periasamy, M. Phosphorylation of Elk-1 by MEK/ERK Pathway is Necessary for c-fos Gene Activation during Cardiac Myocyte Hypertrophy. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2000, 32, 1447–1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Chang, C.-C.; Liu, Y.-C.; Lin, C.-H.; Liao, Y.-C. Histone acetyltransferase p300 mediates the upregulation of CTEN induced by the activation of EGFR signaling in cancer cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2021, 534, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Wang, W.; Lu, Q.; Zhang, J.; Wang, B.; Liu, X.; An, F.; Qin, W.; Chen, X.; Dong, W.; Zhang, C.; et al. HMGB 1 mediates hyperglycaemia-induced cardiomyocyte apoptosis via ERK /Ets-1 signalling pathway. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2014, 18, 2311–2320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ichikawa, K.; Kubota, Y.; Nakamura, T.; Weng, J.S.; Tomida, T.; Saito, H.; Takekawa, M. MCRIP1, an ERK Substrate, Mediates ERK-Induced Gene Silencing during Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition by Regulating the Co-Repressor CtBP. Mol. Cell 2015, 58, 35–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Yang, J.-Y.; Zong, C.S.; Xia, W.; Yamaguchi, H.; Ding, Q.; Xie, X.; Lang, J.-Y.; Lai, C.-C.; Chang, C.-J.; Huang, W.-C.; et al. ERK promotes tumorigenesis by inhibiting FOXO3a via MDM2-mediated degradation. Nat. Cell Biol. 2008, 10, 138–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Krecic, A.M.; Swanson, M.S. hnRNP complexes: Composition, structure, and function. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 1999, 11, 363–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Domina, A.M.; Smith, J.H.; Craig, R.W. Myeloid cell leukemia 1 is phosphorylated through two distinct pathways, one associated with extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation and the other with G2/M accumulation or protein phosphatase 1/2A inhibition. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 21688–21694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Lee, T.-Y.; Cho, I.-S.; Bashyal, N.; Naya, F.J.; Tsai, M.-J.; Yoon, J.S.; Choi, J.-M.; Park, C.-H.; Suh-Kim, S.-S.K.A.H.; Suh-Kim, H. ERK Regulates NeuroD1-mediated Neurite Outgrowth via Proteasomal Degradation. Exp. Neurobiol. 2020, 29, 189–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Gyles, S.L.; Burns, C.J.; Whitehouse, B.J.; Sugden, D.; Marsh, P.J.; Persaud, S.J.; Jones, P.M. ERKs Regulate Cyclic AMP-induced Steroid Synthesis through Transcription of the Steroidogenic Acute Regulatory (StAR) Gene. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 34888–34895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Kosako, H.; Yamaguchi, N.; Aranami, C.; Ushiyama, M.; Kose, S.; Imamoto, N.; Taniguchi, H.; Nishida, E.; Hattori, S. Phosphoproteomics reveals new ERK MAP kinase targets and links ERK to nucleoporin-mediated nuclear transport. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2009, 16, 1026–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Pan, C.; Olsen, J.V.; Daub, H.; Mann, M. Global Effects of Kinase Inhibitors on Signaling Networks Revealed by Quantitative Phosphoproteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2009, 8, 2796–2808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Sugiyama, H.; Takahashi, K.; Yamamoto, T.; Iwasaki, M.; Narita, M.; Nakamura, M.; Rand, T.A.; Nakagawa, M.; Watanabe, A.; Yamanaka, S. Nat1 promotes translation of specific proteins that induce differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 340–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Wang, Y.; Tan, X.; Tang, Y.; Zhang, C.; Xu, J.; Zhou, J.; Cheng, X.; Hou, N.; Liu, W.; Yang, G.; et al. Dysregulated Tgfbr2/ERK-Smad4/SOX2 Signaling Promotes Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma Formation. Cancer Res. 2019, 79, 4466–4479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Cheng, J.T.; Cobb, M.H.; Baer, R. Phosphorylation of the TAL1 oncoprotein by the extracellular-signal-regulated protein kinase ERK1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1993, 13, 801–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Vomastek, T.; Iwanicki, M.P.; Burack, W.R.; Tiwari, D.; Kumar, D.; Parsons, J.T.; Weber, M.J.; Nandicoori, V.K. Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase 2 (ERK2) Phosphorylation Sites and Docking Domain on the Nuclear Pore Complex Protein Tpr Cooperatively Regulate ERK2-Tpr Interaction. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2008, 28, 6954–6966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. West, S.; Gromak, N.; Proudfoot, N.J. Human 5′--> 3′ exonuclease Xrn2 promotes transcription termination at co-transcriptional cleavage sites. Nature 2004, 432, 522–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Balasubramanian, S.; Kuppuswamy, D. RGD-containing peptides activate S6K1 through beta3 integrin in adult cardiac muscle cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 42214–42224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. De Acetis, M.; Notte, A.; Accornero, F.; Selvetella, G.; Brancaccio, M.; Vecchione, C.; Sbroggiò, M.; Collino, F.; Pacchioni, B.; Lanfranchi, G.; et al. Cardiac overexpression of melusin protects from dilated cardiomyopathy due to long-standing pressure overload. Circ. Res. 2005, 96, 1087–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Häuselmann, S.P.; Rosc-Schlüter, B.I.; Lorenz, V.; Plaisance, I.; Brink, M.; Pfister, O.; Kuster, G.M. β1-Integrin is up-regulated via Rac1-dependent reactive oxygen species as part of the hypertrophic cardiomyocyte response. Free. Radic. Biol. Med. 2011, 51, 609–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Nakamura, Y.; Kita, S.; Tanaka, Y.; Fukuda, S.; Obata, Y.; Okita, T.; Kawachi, Y.; Tsugawa-Shimizu, Y.; Fujishima, Y.; Nishizawa, H.; et al. A disintegrin and metalloproteinase 12 prevents heart failure by regulating cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis. Am. J. Physiol. Circ. Physiol. 2020, 318, H238–H251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Dorn, L.E.; Lawrence, W.R.; Petrosino, J.M.; Xu, X.; Hund, T.J.; Whitson, B.A.; Stratton, M.S.; Janssen, P.M.L.; Mohler, P.J.; Schlosser, A.; et al. Microfibrillar-Associated Protein 4 Regulates Stress-Induced Cardiac Remodeling. Circ. Res. 2021, 128, 723–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Liang, F.; Atakilit, A.; Gardner, D.G. Integrin Dependence of Brain Natriuretic Peptide Gene Promoter Activation by Mechanical Strain. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 20355–20360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Lal, H.; Verma, S.K.; Smith, M.; Guleria, R.S.; Lu, G.; Foster, D.M.; Dostal, D.E. Stretch-induced MAP kinase activation in cardiac myocytes: Differential regulation through beta1-integrin and focal adhesion kinase. J. Mol. Cell Cardiol. 2007, 43, 137–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Shih, N.L.; Cheng, T.H.; Loh, S.H.; Cheng, P.Y.; Wang, D.L.; Chen, Y.S.; Liu, S.H.; Liew, C.C.; Chen, J.J. Reactive oxygen species modulate angiotensin II-induced beta-myosin heavy chain gene expression via Ras/Raf/extracellular signal-regulated kinase pathway in neonatal rat cardiomyocytes. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2001, 283, 143–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Wang, C.; Wu, L.-L.; Liu, J.; Zhang, Z.-G.; Fan, D.; Li, L. Crosstalk between angiotensin II and platelet derived growth factor-BB mediated signal pathways in cardiomyocytes. Chin. Med. J. 2008, 121, 236–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Clerk, A.; Pham, F.H.; Fuller, S.J.; Sahai, E.; Aktories, K.; Marais, R.; Marshall, C.; Sugden, P.H. Regulation of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases in Cardiac Myocytes through the Small G Protein Rac1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2001, 21, 1173–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Yamazaki, T.; Komuro, I.; Zou, Y.; Yazaki, Y. Hypertrophic responses of cardiomyocytes induced by endothelin-1 through the protein kinase C-dependent but Src and Ras-independent pathways. Hypertens. Res. 1999, 22, 113–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Kodama, H.; Fukuda, K.; Takahashi, T.; Sano, M.; Kato, T.; Tahara, S.; Hakuno, D.; Sato, T.; Manabe, T.; Konishi, F.; et al. Role of EGF Receptor and Pyk2 in Endothelin-1-induced ERK Activation in Rat Cardiomyocytes. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2002, 34, 139–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Zou, Y.; Komuro, I.; Yamazaki, T.; Kudoh, S.; Uozumi, H.; Kadowaki, T.; Yazaki, Y. Both Gs and Gi Proteins Are Critically Involved in Isoproterenol-induced Cardiomyocyte Hypertrophy. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 9760–9770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Hilal-Dandan, R.; Means, C.K.; Gustafsson, Å.B.; Morissette, M.R.; Adams, J.W.; Brunton, L.L.; Brown, J.H. Lysophosphatidic acid induces hypertrophy of neonatal cardiac myocytes via activation of Gi and Rho. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2004, 36, 481–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Chen, J.; Chen, Y.; Zhu, W.; Han, Y.; Han, B.; Xu, R.; Deng, L.; Cai, Y.; Cong, X.; Yang, Y.; et al. Specific LPA receptor subtype mediation of LPA-induced hypertrophy of cardiac myocytes and involvement of Akt and NFkappaB signal pathways. J. Cell Biochem. 2008, 103, 1718–1731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Xiao, L.; Pimentel, D.R.; Wang, J.; Singh, K.; Colucci, W.S.; Sawyer, D.B. Role of reactive oxygen species and NAD(P)H oxidase in α1-adrenoceptor signaling in adult rat cardiac myocytes. Am. J. Physiol. Physiol. 2002, 282, C926–C934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Hines, W.A.; Thorburn, A. Ras and rho are required for galphaq-induced hypertrophic gene expression in neonatal rat cardiac myocytes. J. Mol. Cell Cardiol. 1998, 30, 485–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Sabri, A.; Wilson, B.A.; Steinberg, S.F. Dual actions of the Galpha(q) agonist Pasteurella multocida toxin to promote cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and enhance apoptosis susceptibility. Circ. Res. 2002, 90, 850–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Lorenz, K.; Schmitt, J.P.; Schmitteckert, E.M.; Lohse, M.J. A new type of ERK1/2 autophosphorylation causes cardiac hypertrophy. Nat. Med. 2009, 15, 75–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Shi, J.; Zhang, Y.-W.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Wei, L. ROCK1 plays an essential role in the transition from cardiac hypertrophy to failure in mice. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2010, 49, 819–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Vidal, M.; Wieland, T.; Lohse, M.J.; Lorenz, K. β-Adrenergic receptor stimulation causes cardiac hypertrophy via a Gβγ/Erk-dependent pathway. Cardiovasc. Res. 2012, 96, 255–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Nishida, M.; Takagahara, S.; Maruyama, Y.; Sugimoto, Y.; Nagao, T.; Kurose, H. G beta gamma counteracts G alpha(q) signaling upon alpha(1)-adrenergic receptor stimulation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2002, 291, 995–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Zou, M.-X.; Roy, A.A.; Zhao, Q.; Kirshenbaum, L.A.; Karmazyn, M.; Chidiac, P. RGS2 is upregulated by and attenuates the hypertrophic effect of α1-adrenergic activation in cultured ventricular myocytes. Cell. Signal. 2006, 18, 1655–1663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Li, Y.; Tang, X.H.; Li, X.H.; Dai, H.; Miao, R.; Cai, J.; Huang, Z.; Chen, A.F.; Xing, X.; Lu, Y.; et al. Regulator of G protein signalling 14 attenuates cardiac remodelling through the MEK-ERK1/2 signalling pathway. Basic Res. Cardiol. 2016, 111, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Morhenn, K.; Quentin, T.; Wichmann, H.; Steinmetz, M.; Prondzynski, M.; Söhren, K.-D.; Christ, T.; Geertz, B.; Schröder, S.; Schöndube, F.A.; et al. Mechanistic role of the CREB-regulated transcription coactivator 1 in cardiac hypertrophy. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2019, 127, 31–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Anger, T.; Klintworth, N.; Stumpf, C.; Daniel, W.G.; Mende, U.; Garlichs, C.D. RGS protein specificity towards Gq- and Gi/o-mediated ERK 1/2 and Akt activation, in vitro. J. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2007, 40, 899–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Chidiac, P.; Sobiesiak, A.J.; Lee, K.N.; Gros, R.; Nguyen, C.H. The eIF2B-interacting domain of RGS2 protects against GPCR agonist-induced hypertrophy in neonatal rat cardiomyocytes. Cell. Signal. 2014, 26, 1226–1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Wright, C.D.; Chen, Q.; Baye, N.L.; Huang, Y.; Healy, C.L.; Kasinathan, S.; O’Connell, T.D. Nuclear α1-Adrenergic Receptors Signal Activated ERK Localization to Caveolae in Adult Cardiac Myocytes. Circ. Res. 2008, 103, 992–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Dahl, E.F.; Wu, S.C.; Healy, C.L.; Perry, J.; O’Connell, T.D. ERK mediated survival signaling is dependent on the Gq-G-protein coupled receptor type and subcellular localization in adult cardiac myocytes. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2019, 127, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Cohen, S. The stimulation of epidermal proliferation by a specific protein (EGF). Dev. Biol. 1965, 12, 394–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Kasuga, M.; Zick, Y.; Blithe, D.L.; Crettaz, M.; Kahn, C.R. Insulin stimulates tyrosine phosphorylation of the insulin receptor in a cell-free system. Nat. Cell Biol. 1982, 298, 667–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Ek, B.; Westermark, B.; Wasteson, Å.; Heldin, C.-H. Stimulation of tyrosine-specific phosphorylation by platelet-derived growth factor. Nat. Cell Biol. 1982, 295, 419–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Carrasco, L.; Cea, P.; Rocco, P.; Peña-Oyarzún, D.; Rivera-Mejias, P.; Sotomayor-Flores, C.; Quiroga, C.; Criollo, A.; Ibarra, C.; Chiong, M.; et al. Role of Heterotrimeric G Protein and Calcium in Cardiomyocyte Hypertrophy Induced by IGF-1. J. Cell. Biochem. 2014, 115, 712–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Yu, L.; Daniels, J.; Glaser, A.E.; Wolf, M.J. Raf-mediated cardiac hypertrophy in adult Drosophila. Dis. Model. Mech. 2013, 6, 964–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Ebeid, D.E.; Firouzi, F.; Esquer, C.Y.; Navarrete, J.M.; Wang, B.J.; Gude, N.A.; Sussman, M.A. PIM1 Promotes Survival of Cardiomyocytes by Upregulating c-Kit Protein Expression. Cells 2020, 9, 2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Alakoski, T.; Ulvila, J.; Yrjölä, R.; Vainio, L.; Magga, J.; Szabo, Z.; Licht, J.D.; Kerkelä, R. Inhibition of cardiomyocyte Sprouty1 protects from cardiac ischemia–reperfusion injury. Basic Res. Cardiol. 2019, 114, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. LaFramboise, W.A.; Petrosko, P.; Krill-Burger, J.M.; Morris, D.R.; McCoy, A.R.; Scalise, D.; Malehorn, D.E.; Guthrie, R.D.; Becich, M.J.; Dhir, R. Proteins secreted by embryonic stem cells activate cardiomyocytes through ligand binding pathways. J. Proteom. 2010, 73, 992–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Gu, Y.; Zou, Y.; Aikawa, R.; Hayashi, D.; Kudoh, S.; Yamauchi, T.; Uozumi, H.; Zhu, W.; Kadowaki, T.; Yazaki, Y.; et al. Growth hormone signalling and apoptosis in neonatal rat cardiomyocytes. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2001, 223, 35–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. van Berlo, J.H.; Elrod, J.W.; Aronow, B.J.; Pu, W.T.; Molkentin, J.D. Serine 105 phosphorylation of transcription factor GATA4 is necessary for stress-induced cardiac hypertrophy in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 12331–12336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Tenhunen, O.; Sármán, B.; Kerkelä, R.; Szokodi, I.; Papp, L.; Tóth, M.; Ruskoaho, H. Mitogen-activated protein kinases p38 and ERK 1/2 mediate the wall stress-induced activation of GATA-4 binding in adult heart. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 24852–24860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Gallo, S.; Spilinga, M.; Casanova, E.; Bonzano, A.; Boccaccio, C.; Comoglio, P.M.; Crepaldi, T. The Long-Lasting Protective Effect of HGF in Cardiomyoblasts Exposed to Doxorubicin Requires a Positive Feed-Forward Loop Mediated by Erk1,2-Timp1-Stat3. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Harris, I.S.; Zhang, S.; Treskov, I.; Kovacs, A.; Weinheimer, C.; Muslin, A.J. Raf-1 Kinase Is Required for Cardiac Hypertrophy and Cardiomyocyte Survival in Response to Pressure Overload. Circulation 2004, 110, 718–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Bueno, O.F.; De Windt, L.J.; Tymitz, K.M.; Witt, S.A.; Kimball, T.R.; Klevitsky, R.; Hewett, T.E.; Jones, S.P.; Lefer, D.J.; Peng, C.F.; et al. The MEK1-ERK1/2 signaling pathway promotes compensated cardiac hypertrophy in transgenic mice. Embo J. 2000, 19, 6341–6350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Lips, D.J.; Bueno, O.F.; Wilkins, B.J.; Purcell, N.H.; Kaiser, R.A.; Lorenz, J.N.; Voisin, L.; Saba-El-Leil, M.K.; Meloche, S.; Pouysségur, J.; et al. MEK1-ERK2 Signaling Pathway Protects Myocardium from Ischemic Injury In Vivo. Circulation 2004, 109, 1938–1941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Purcell, N.H.; Wilkins, B.J.; York, A.; Saba-El-Leil, M.K.; Meloche, S.; Robbins, J.; Molkentin, J.D. Genetic inhibition of cardiac ERK1/2 promotes stress-induced apoptosis and heart failure but has no effect on hypertrophy in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 14074–14079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Kehat, I.; Davis, J.; Tiburcy, M.; Accornero, F.; Saba-El-Leil, M.K.; Maillet, M.; York, A.J.; Lorenz, J.N.; Zimmermann, W.H.; Meloche, S.; et al. Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinases 1 and 2 Regulate the Balance Between Eccentric and Concentric Cardiac Growth. Circ. Res. 2011, 108, 176–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Li, X.-M.; Ma, Y.-T.; Yang, Y.-N.; Liu, F.; Chen, B.-D.; Han, W.; Zhang, J.-F.; Gao, X.-M. Downregulation of survival signalling pathways and increased apoptosis in the transition of pressure overload-induced cardiac hypertrophy to heart failure. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 2009, 36, 1054–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Takai, Y.; Sasaki, T.; Matozaki, T. Small GTP-Binding Proteins. Physiol. Rev. 2001, 81, 153–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Yi, J.; Chen, M.; Wu, X.; Yang, X.; Xu, T.; Zhuang, Y.; Han, M.; Xu, R. Endothelial SUR-8 acts in an ERK-independent pathway during atrioventricular cushion development. Dev. Dyn. 2010, 239, 2005–2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Hannig, V.; Jeoung, M.; Jang, E.R.; Phillips, J.A., 3rd; Galperin, E. A Novel SHOC2 Variant in Rasopathy. Hum. Mutat. 2014, 35, 1290–1294. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  119. Rachmin, I.; Tshori, S.; Smith, Y.; Oppenheim, A.; Marchetto, S.; Kay, G.; Foo, R.S.-Y.; Dagan, N.; Golomb, E.; Gilon, D.; et al. Erbin is a negative modulator of cardiac hypertrophy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 5902–5907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  120. Brokat, S.; Thomas, J.; Herda, L.R.; Knosalla, C.; Pregla, R.; Brancaccio, M.; Accornero, F.; Tarone, G.; Hetzer, R.; Regitz-Zagrosek, V. Altered melusin expression in the hearts of aortic stenosis patients. Eur. J. Hear. Fail. 2007, 9, 568–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Brancaccio, M.; Fratta, L.; Notte, A.; Hirsch, E.; Poulet, R.; Guazzone, S.; De Acetis, M.; Vecchione, C.; Marino, G.; Altruda, F.; et al. Melusin, a muscle-specific integrin β1–interacting protein, is required to prevent cardiac failure in response to chronic pressure overload. Nat. Med. 2002, 9, 68–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Sbroggiò, M.; Carnevale, D.; Bertero, A.; Cifelli, G.; de Blasio, E.; Mascio, G.; Hirsch, E.; Bahou, W.F.; Turco, E.; Silengo, L.; et al. IQGAP1 regulates ERK1/2 and AKT signalling in the heart and sustains functional remodelling upon pressure overload. Cardiovasc. Res. 2011, 91, 456–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  123. Sbroggiò, M.; Bertero, A.; Velasco, S.; Fusella, F.; De Blasio, E.; Bahou, W.F.; Silengo, L.; Turco, E.; Brancaccio, M.; Tarone, G. ERK1/2 activation in heart is controlled by melusin, focal adhesion kinase and the scaffold protein IQGAP1. J. Cell Sci. 2011, 124, 3515–3524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  124. Chen, Q.; Lin, T.H.; Der, C.J.; Juliano, R.L. Integrin-mediated activation of MEK and mitogen-activated protein kinase is independent of Ras [corrected]. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 18122–18127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  125. Cervantes, D.; Crosby, C.; Xiang, Y. Arrestin Orchestrates Crosstalk Between G Protein-Coupled Receptors to Modulate the Spatiotemporal Activation of ERK MAPK. Circ. Res. 2010, 106, 79–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Noma, T.; Lemaire, A.; Prasad, S.V.N.; Barki-Harrington, L.; Tilley, D.G.; Chen, J.; Le Corvoisier, P.; Violin, J.D.; Wei, H.; Lefkowitz, R.J.; et al. Beta-arrestin-mediated beta1-adrenergic receptor transactivation of the EGFR confers cardioprotection. J. Clin. Investig. 2007, 117, 2445–2458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Shi, M.; Zhao, M.; Hu, M.; Liu, D.; Cao, H.; Qian, L.; Yang, Z.; Hu, Y.; Yu, M.; Yang, S.; et al. β2-AR-induced Her2 transactivation mediated by Erbin confers protection from apoptosis in cardiomyocytes. Int. J. Cardiol. 2013, 167, 1570–1577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Sheikh, F.; Raskin, A.; Chu, P.-H.; Lange, S.; Domenighetti, A.A.; Zheng, M.; Liang, X.; Zhang, T.; Yajima, T.; Gu, Y.; et al. An FHL1-containing complex within the cardiomyocyte sarcomere mediates hypertrophic biomechanical stress responses in mice. J. Clin. Investig. 2008, 118, 3870–3880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Zhong, L.; Chiusa, M.; Cadar, A.G.; Lin, A.; Samaras, S.; Davidson, J.M.; Lim, C.C. Targeted inhibition of ANKRD1 disrupts sarcomeric ERK-GATA4 signal transduction and abrogates phenylephrine-induced cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. Cardiovasc. Res. 2015, 106, 261–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Tiffany, H.; Sonkar, K.; Gage, M.J. The insertion sequence of the N2A region of titin exists in an extended structure with helical characteristics. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Proteins Proteom. 2017, 1865, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Radke, M.H.; Peng, J.; Wu, Y.; McNabb, M.; Nelson, O.L.; Granzier, H.; Gotthardt, M. Targeted deletion of titin N2B region leads to diastolic dysfunction and cardiac atrophy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 3444–3449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Bueno, O.F.; De Windt, L.J.; Lim, H.W.; Tymitz, K.M.; Witt, S.A.; Kimball, T.R.; Molkentin, J.D. The Dual-Specificity Phosphatase MKP-1 Limits the Cardiac Hypertrophic Response In Vitro and In Vivo. Circ. Res. 2001, 88, 88–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  133. Ferguson, B.S.; Harrison, B.C.; Jeong, M.Y.; Reid, B.G.; Wempe, M.F.; Wagner, F.F.; Holson, E.B.; McKinsey, T.A. Signal-dependent repression of DUSP5 by class I HDACs controls nuclear ERK activity and cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 9806–9811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  134. Liu, R.; van Berlo, J.H.; York, A.J.; Vagnozzi, R.J.; Maillet, M.; Molkentin, J.D. DUSP8 Regulates Cardiac Ventricular Remodeling by Altering ERK1/2 Signaling. Circ. Res. 2016, 119, 249–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  135. Zhao, J.; Jiang, X.; Liu, J.; Ye, P.; Jiang, L.; Chen, M.; Xia, J. Dual-Specificity Phosphatase 26 Protects Against Cardiac Hypertrophy Through TAK1. J. Am. Hear. Assoc. 2021, 10, e014311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Ruppert, C.; Deiss, K.; Herrmann, S.; Vidal, M.; Oezkur, M.; Gorski, A.; Weidemann, F.; Lohse, M.J.; Lorenz, K. Interference with ERK(Thr188) phosphorylation impairs pathological but not physiological cardiac hypertrophy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 7440–7445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  137. Tomasovic, A.; Brand, T.; Schanbacher, C. Interference with ERK-dimerization at the nucleocytosolic interface targets pathological ERK1/2 signaling without cardiotoxic side-effects. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  138. Studer, R.; Reinecke, H.; Müller, B.; Holtz, J.; Just, H.; Drexler, H. Increased angiotensin-I converting enzyme gene expression in the failing human heart. Quantification by competitive RNA polymerase chain reaction. J. Clin. Investig. 1994, 94, 301–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Schunkert, H.; Jackson, B.; Tang, S.S.; Schoen, F.J.; Smits, J.F.; Apstein, C.S.; Lorell, B.H. Distribution and functional significance of cardiac angiotensin converting enzyme in hypertrophied rat hearts. Circulation 1993, 87, 1328–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  140. Smith, W.; Ball, S. ACE inhibitors in heart failure: An update. Basic Res. Cardiol. 2000, 95 (Suppl. 1), I8–I14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Kai, H.; Muraishi, A.; Sugiu, Y.; Nishi, H.; Seki, Y.; Kuwahara, F.; Kimura, A.; Kato, H.; Imaizumi, T. Expression of Proto-oncogenes and Gene Mutation of Sarcomeric Proteins in Patients with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Circ. Res. 1998, 83, 594–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  142. Rauen, K.A. The RASopathies. Annu. Rev. Genom. Hum. Genet. 2013, 14, 355–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  143. Wu, X.; Simpson, J.C.; Hong, J.H.; Kim, K.-H.; Thavarajah, N.K.; Backx, P.H.; Neel, B.G.; Araki, T. MEK-ERK pathway modulation ameliorates disease phenotypes in a mouse model of Noonan syndrome associated with the Raf1L613V mutation. J. Clin. Investig. 2011, 121, 1009–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  144. Carvajal-Vergara, X.; Sevilla, A.; D’Souza, S.L.; Ang, Y.-S.; Schaniel, C.; Lee, D.-F.; Yang, L.; Kaplan, A.D.; Adler, E.D.; Rozov, R.; et al. Patient-specific induced pluripotent stem-cell-derived models of LEOPARD syndrome. Nat. Cell Biol. 2010, 465, 808–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  145. Sarkozy, A.; Carta, C.; Moretti, S.; Zampino, G.; Digilio, M.C.; Pantaleoni, F.; Scioletti, A.P.; Esposito, G.; Cordeddu, V.; Lepri, F.; et al. GermlineBRAFmutations in Noonan, LEOPARD, and cardiofaciocutaneous syndromes: Molecular diversity and associated phenotypic spectrum. Hum. Mutat. 2009, 30, 695–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  146. Mincu, R.I.; Mahabadi, A.A.; Michel, L.; Mrotzek, S.M.; Schadendorf, D.; Rassaf, T.; Totzeck, M. Cardiovascular Adverse Events Associated with BRAF and MEK Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw. Open 2019, 2, e198890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  147. Bronte, E.; Bronte, G.; Novo, G.; Bronte, F.; Bavetta, M.G.; Re, G.L.; Brancatelli, G.; Bazan, V.; Natoli, C.; Novo, S.; et al. What links BRAF to the heart function? new insights from the cardiotoxicity of BRAF inhibitors in cancer treatment. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 35589–35601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  148. Davies, H.; Bignell, G.R.; Cox, C.; Stephens, P.; Edkins, S.; Clegg, S.; Teague, J.; Woffendin, H.; Garnett, M.J.; Bottomley, W.; et al. Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer. Nature 2002, 417, 949–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Paraiso, K.H.; Fedorenko, I.V.; Cantini, L.P.; Munko, A.C.; Hall, M.; Sondak, V.K.; Messina, J.L.; Flaherty, K.T.; Smalley, K.S.M. Recovery of phospho-ERK activity allows melanoma cells to escape from BRAF inhibitor therapy. Br. J. Cancer 2010, 102, 1724–1730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Robert, C.; Grob, J.J.; Stroyakovskiy, D.; Karaszewska, B.; Hauschild, A.; Levchenko, E.; Sileni, V.C.; Schachter, J.; Garbe, C.; Bondarenko, I.; et al. Five-Year Outcomes with Dabrafenib plus Trametinib in Metastatic Melanoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019, 381, 626–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Ascierto, P.A.; McArthur, G.A.; Dréno, B.; Atkinson, V.; Liszkay, G.; di Giacomo, A.M.; Mandalà, M.; Demidov, L.; Stroyakovskiy, D.; Thomas, L.; et al. Cobimetinib combined with vemurafenib in advanced BRAF(V600)-mutant melanoma (coBRIM): Updated efficacy results from a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016, 17, 1248–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Dummer, R.; Ascierto, P.A.; Gogas, H.J.; Arance, A.; Mandala, M.; Liszkay, G.; Garbe, C.; Schadendorf, D.; Krajsova, I.; Gutzmer, R.; et al. Encorafenib plus binimetinib versus vemurafenib or encorafenib in patients with BRAF -mutant melanoma (COLUMBUS): A multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018, 19, 603–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  153. Santos, E.; Crespo, P. The RAS-ERK pathway: A route for couples. Sci. Signal. 2018, 11, eaav0917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Philips, M.R.; Der, C.J. Seeing is believing: Ras dimers observed in live cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 9793–9794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  155. Ambrogio, C.; Köhler, J.; Zhou, Z.-W.; Wang, H.; Paranal, R.; Li, J.; Capelletti, M.; Caffarra, C.; Li, S.; Lv, Q.; et al. KRAS Dimerization Impacts MEK Inhibitor Sensitivity and Oncogenic Activity of Mutant KRAS. Cell 2018, 172, 857–868.e15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Freeman, A.K.; Ritt, D.A.; Morrison, D.K. The importance of Raf dimerization in cell signaling. Small GTPases 2013, 4, 180–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Catalanotti, F.; Reyes, G.; Jesenberger, V.; Galabova-Kovacs, G.; Simoes, R.D.M.; Carugo, O.; Baccarini, M. A Mek1–Mek2 heterodimer determines the strength and duration of the Erk signal. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2009, 16, 294–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Rajakulendran, T.; Sahmi, M.; Lefrançois, M.; Sicheri, F.; Therrien, M. A dimerization-dependent mechanism drives RAF catalytic activation. Nat. Cell Biol. 2009, 461, 542–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Biology 10 00346 g001 550
Figure 1. The cardiomyocyte ERK signaling event framework, where extracellular cues drive the activation of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), and integrins to elicit ERK signaling and cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. For RTKs, the SOS exchange the SOS exchange factor activates Ras, scaffolded by Shoc2, to promote serial phosphorylation and downstream ERK activation. GPCR and integrin activation can occur under cardiomyocyte stress with respective scaffolding complexes (β-arrestin for GPCRs and the IQGAP1-Melusin-FAK supercomplex for integrins) functioning to temporally and spatially modulate the transduced signal. Active ERK functions to drive cardiomyocyte hypertrophy through the phosphorylation of cytoplasmic, cytoskeletal, and nuclear targets to modulate gene expression. Specific phosphatases such as DUSP5, 6 and 8 act to temporally limit ERK activation and favor signal termination.
Figure 1. The cardiomyocyte ERK signaling event framework, where extracellular cues drive the activation of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), and integrins to elicit ERK signaling and cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. For RTKs, the SOS exchange the SOS exchange factor activates Ras, scaffolded by Shoc2, to promote serial phosphorylation and downstream ERK activation. GPCR and integrin activation can occur under cardiomyocyte stress with respective scaffolding complexes (β-arrestin for GPCRs and the IQGAP1-Melusin-FAK supercomplex for integrins) functioning to temporally and spatially modulate the transduced signal. Active ERK functions to drive cardiomyocyte hypertrophy through the phosphorylation of cytoplasmic, cytoskeletal, and nuclear targets to modulate gene expression. Specific phosphatases such as DUSP5, 6 and 8 act to temporally limit ERK activation and favor signal termination.
Biology 10 00346 g001
Table
Table 1. Direct ERK interactors identified for both mouse and human. Targets were primarily obtained from a compendium of ERK targets [26].
Table 1. Direct ERK interactors identified for both mouse and human. Targets were primarily obtained from a compendium of ERK targets [26].
LocalizationGene NameProtein NameRole/FunctionReferences
Plasma Membrane CAPN2Calpain-2 catalytic subunitPlays a role in epidermal growth factor (EGF)-mediated cell adhesion and motility.[27,28,29]
NOXA1NADPH oxidase activator 1Activates NADPH oxidase NOX1 to produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) that play a role in host defense, hormone biosynthesis, and sensing.[29,30]
CytoskeletonAKAP12A-kinase anchor protein 12Anchors protein kinases A (PKA) and C (PKC) and plays a role in cell cycle regulation.[29,31,32,33,34]
AMPHAmphiphysinPlays a role in endoyctosis.[29,35,36,37]
MAP1BMicrotubule-associated protein 1BPlays a role in neurite extension, where phosphorylation may induce microtubule association.[29,32,33,34]
TNKS1BP1182 kDa tankyrase-1-binding proteinFunctions in regulating the actin cytoskeleton. [29,33,34,38]
CytosolDCP1AmRNA-decapping enzyme 1AModulates gene expression through interaction with decapping enzyme Dcp2.[29,33,39]
RPS340S ribosomal protein S3Functions as a member of the ribosomal small subunit; plays a role in DNA repair.[29,32,33,34,40]
RPS6KA1Ribosomal protein S6 kinase alpha-1 (RSK1)Acts downstream of ERK found in both the cytosol and nucleus. [29,41]
RPS6KA3Ribosomal protein S6 kinase alpha-3 (RSK2)Acts downstream of ERK found in both the cytosol and nucleus. [29,41]
RPS6KA2Ribosomal protein S6 kinase alpha-2 (RSK3)Acts downstream of ERK found in both the cytosol and nucleus. [29,41]
SPHK1Sphingosine kinase 1Activates proteins tied to proliferation and repression of apoptosis following activation through phosphorylation. [29,42]
STAT1Signal transducer and activator of transcription 1-alpha/betaTransduces interferon-, growth factor-, and cytokine-mediated signals.[29,33,43,44]
STIM1Stromal interaction molecule 1Upon intracellular Ca2+ depletion, translocates from the ER membrane to near the plasma membrane to activate store-operated calcium channels (SOCs).[29,45]
TP53Cellular tumor antigen p53Functions as a cell cycle regulator and tumor suppressor. [29,46]
NucleusAHNAKNeuroblast differentiation-associated protein AHNAKMay be required for neuronal cell differentiation; has been observed to disrupt PKC-PP2A complex to upregulate ERK signaling in NIH3T3 fibroblasts.[29,32,34,47,48,49,50]
ATF2Cyclic AMP-dependent transcription factor ATF-2Upon phosphorylation, upregulates genes tied to DNA damage response and cell growth.[29,37,51]
CEBPBCCAAT/enhancer-binding protein betaPhosphorylation of the CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein-b (C/EBPb) by ERK2 (not ERK1) enhances its interaction with SRF and its transactivation activity.[29,52]
ELK1ETS domain-containing protein Elk-1Primarily functions to transcribe c-Fos, which plays a role in cell proliferation and differentiation; phosphorylation enhances activity.[29,37,53]
EP300Histone acetyltransferase p300Regulates transcription via chromatin remodeling.[29,54]
ETS1Protein C-ets-1Regulates immune cell function.[29,55]
FAM195BMapk-regulated corepressor-interacting protein 1Regulates co-repressor CtBP to mediate gene silencing during the epithelial-mesenchymal transition. [29,34,56]
FOXO3Forkhead box protein O3Regulates cellular processes, such as apoptosis and autophagy, where nuclear translocation occurs in response to stress. [29,57]
HNRNPH1Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein HMediates pre-mRNA splicing.[58]
JUNTranscription factor AP-1 (c-Jun)Plays an integral role in cell cycle progression.[29,32,37]
MCL1Induced myeloid leukemia cell differentiation protein Mcl-1Plays a role in regulating apoptosis. [29,59]
NDF1Neurogenic differentiation factor 1Regulates differentiation of neuronal and endocrine cells.[29,37,60]
NR5A1Steroidogenic factor 1Plays a role in the development of the primary steroidogenic tissues in both sexes.[29,61]
NUP153Nuclear pore complex protein Nup153Functions trafficking across the nuclear envelope.[29,32,33,34,62,63]
PRRC2AProtein PRRC2A (BAT2)Functions in oligodendrocyte specification; plays a role in pre-mRNA splicing.[29,33,34,50,64]
RPS6KA5Ribosomal protein S6 kinase alpha-5 (MSK1)Upon activations, functions to phosphorylate CREB1 and ATF1 in response to mitogenic or stress signaling.[29,41]
SMAD4Mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 4Balances atrophy and hypertrophy, where nuclear translocation occurs R-SMAD; Component of nuclear SMAD2/SMAD3-SMAD4 complex.[29,37,65]
TAL1T-cell acute lymphocytic leukemia protein 1Serves as a positive regulator of erythroid differentiation.[29,37,66]
TPRNucleoprotein TPRFunctions trafficking across the nuclear envelope; plays an integral role in cell division.[29,32,34,50,67]
XRN25’-3’ exoribonuclease 2Functions in RNA degradation.[29,32,34,68]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gilbert, C.J.; Longenecker, J.Z.; Accornero, F. ERK1/2: An Integrator of Signals That Alters Cardiac Homeostasis and Growth. Biology 2021, 10, 346. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10040346

AMA Style

Gilbert CJ, Longenecker JZ, Accornero F. ERK1/2: An Integrator of Signals That Alters Cardiac Homeostasis and Growth. Biology. 2021; 10(4):346. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10040346

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gilbert, Christopher J., Jacob Z. Longenecker, and Federica Accornero. 2021. "ERK1/2: An Integrator of Signals That Alters Cardiac Homeostasis and Growth" Biology 10, no. 4: 346. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10040346

APA Style

Gilbert, C. J., Longenecker, J. Z., & Accornero, F. (2021). ERK1/2: An Integrator of Signals That Alters Cardiac Homeostasis and Growth. Biology, 10(4), 346. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10040346

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop