Surface Roughness-Dependent Morphology and Corrosion Protection of Polymeric–Ceramic ZnO Nanocoatings on Ti6Al4V Alloys
Highlights
- Xanthan gum–celite organic matrix blend-mediated ZnO NPs were synthesized using an ultrasonication process.
- The surface roughness of Ti6Al4V alloys was changed by turning processes at different feed rates.
- The roughened surface of Ti6Al4V alloys was coated with spherical-shaped ZnO NPs.
- Organic–inorganic nanostructures were homogeneously distributed with good dispersion on the substrate surface.
- After coating, protection effectiveness of up to 98.48% was achieved.
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials
2.2. Preparation of Polymeric–Ceramic Matrix-Based ZnO NPs
2.3. Substrate Preparation with Different Surface Roughness
2.4. Contact Angle Measurements of Substrates with Different Surface Roughness
2.5. Preparation of XG/CE-ZnO NP-Coated Ti6Al4V Surfaces
2.6. Characterization of XG/CE-ZnO NP-Coated Ti6Al4V Surfaces
2.7. Electrochemical Corrosion Test
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Characterization Results of XG/CE-ZnO NPs
3.2. Contact Angles of Substrates with Different Surface Roughness
3.3. Characterization of XG/CE-ZnO NP-Coated Ti6Al4V Surface
3.3.1. Surface Roughness Results
3.3.2. Microstructural Characterization Results
3.3.3. Macrostructure and Microhardness Results
3.3.4. Electrochemical Corrosion Test Results
4. Conclusions
- The TEM results demonstrated that CE concentration significantly influenced the morphology and size of XG/CE-ZnO NPs. At the optimum concentration of 0.03 g CE, stable NP formation of balanced CE levels was achieved, and uniform spherical NPs were obtained. ZnO NPs were well dispersed in the XG/CE clay organic matrix, with an average size of approximately 50 nm and a spherical shape. ZnO NPs showed a hexagonal wurtzite crystallographic structure.
- Different Ra values were obtained using the turning technique, which is cost-effective, provides good dimensional accuracy, and maintains surface integrity. In the turning process, Ra values increased with increasing feed rate.
- Ra values of the surface-modified Ti6Al4V alloys decreased by approximately 12%–18% after coating them in all samples. The improvement in surface smoothness after coating is less pronounced on specimens with initially rough surfaces.
- With the increasing Ra value of Ti6Al4V alloy substrate surfaces, the CA decreases and the spreading behavior of the droplet increases.
- The chemical composition of the coating surface was essentially consistent across specimens, regardless of differences in Ra.
- After nanocoating, an increase in microhardness was observed on the surface of all samples. The increase in substrate roughness influenced macroscale morphology. Smooth surfaces with decreasing Ra values provided better corrosion protection. After coating, Ti6Al4V substrates showed a more positive Ecorr and a lower Icorr.
- By optimizing cutting parameters, machining can provide surfaces with long-lasting protective nanocoatings.
- The findings of this study could support the development of innovative methods and materials for the modern design of implantable medical devices featuring nanostructured surfaces.
- Improving the long-term corrosion resistance of Ti6Al4V implants remains a major challenge that requires the application of various surface modification strategies. Our future research goals include applying different strategies, such as surface texturing and coating applications, to prevent shortened service life of the implant and improve its performance by enhancing bioactivity and antibacterial activity.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Solanke, S.; Gaval, V.; Sanghavi, S. In vitro tribological investigation and osseointegration assessment for metallic orthopedic bioimplant materials. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 44, 4173–4178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hagen, C.M.H.; Hognestad, A.; Knudsen, O.; Sørby, K. The effect of surface roughness on corrosion resistance of machined and epoxy coated steel. Prog. Org. Coat. 2019, 130, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Posner, R.; Ozcan, O.; Grundmeier, G. Water and Ions at Polymer/Metal Interfaces. In Design of Adhesive Joints Under Humid Conditions. Advanced Structured Materials; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; pp. 21–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaur, M.; Singh, K. Review on titanium and titanium based alloys as biomaterials for orthopaedic applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2019, 102, 844–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nicholson, J.W. Titanium Alloys for Dental Implants: A Review. Prosthesis 2020, 2, 100–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karabulut, G.; Üllen, N.B.; Karakuş, S.; Ersoy, M. Comparison of surface modification and corrosion resistance of Ti6Al4V alloy using matcha tea extract-based silver and copper oxide nanoparticles. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2024, 480, 130564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alcudia, A.; Begines, B.; Rodriguez-Lejarraga, P.; Greyer, V.; Godinho, V.C.F.; Pajuelo, E.; Torres, Y. Development of porous silver nanoparticle/polycaprolactone/polyvinyl alcohol coatings for prophylaxis in titanium interconnected samples for dental implants. Colloid Interface Sci. Commun. 2022, 48, 100621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alba-Cabañas, J.; Speranza, R.; Pedico, A.; Lamberti, A.; Vaillant-Roca, L. Enhancing coating uniformity and performance with zinc oxide nanoparticles interface layer in dye-sensitized cells. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2024, 310, 117748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jamkhande, P.G.; Ghule, N.W.; Bamer, A.H.; Kalaskar, M.G. Metal nanoparticles synthesis: An overview on methods of preparation, advantages and disadvantages, and applications. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 101174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karabulut, G.; Üllen, N.B.; Karakuş, S.; Toruntay, C. Enhancing antibacterial and anticorrosive properties of 316L stainless steel with nanocoating of copper oxide nanoparticles. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2023, 308, 128265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamad, Q.A.; Faheed, N.K.; Issa, R.A.H. Wettability; morphological, miscibility characterization of alginate, and chitosan-based bio composite coatings. Surf. Eng. 2024, 40, 629–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karabulut, G.; Üllen, N.B.; Akyüz, E.; Karakuş, S. Surface modification of 316L stainless steel with multifunctional locust gum/polyethylene glycol-silver nanoparticles using different coating methods. Prog. Org. Coat. 2023, 174, 107291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, S.; Liang, X.; Gadd, G.M.; Zhao, Q. A sol–gel based silver nanoparticle/polytetrafluorethylene (AgNP/PTFE) coating with enhanced antibacterial and anti-corrosive properties. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 535, 147675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tavakoli, S.; Nemati, S.; Kharaziha, M.; Akbari-Alavijeh, S. Embedding CuO Nanoparticles in PDMS-SiO2 Coating to Improve Antibacterial Characteristic and Corrosion Resistance. Colloid Interface Sci. Commun. 2019, 28, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferraris, S.; Spriano, S.; Pan, G.; Venturello, A.; Bianchi, C.L.; Chiesa, R.; Faga, M.G.; Maina, G.; Vernè, E. Surface modification of Ti–6Al–4V alloy for biomineralization and specific biological response: Part I, inorganic modification. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2011, 22, 533–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Roldán, M.V.; Castro, Y.; Pellegri, N.; Durán, A. Enhanced photocatalytic activity of mesoporous SiO2/TiO2 sol–gel coatings doped with Ag nanoparticles. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2015, 76, 180–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sadanandan, B.; Krishna, P.M.; Kumari, M.; Vijayalakshmi, V.; Nagabhushana, B.M.; Vangala, S.; Singh, H.K.; Swaroopa, B.R.D.; Megala, V. Zinc oxide nanoparticles exhibit anti-cancer activity against human cell lines. J. Mol. Struct. 2024, 1305, 137723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-darwesh, M.Y.; Ibrahim, S.S.; Mohammed, M.A. A Review on Plant Extract Mediated Green Synthesis of Zinc oxide Nanoparticles and Their biomedical Applications. Results Chem. 2024, 7, 101368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeghoud, S.; Hemmami, H.; Seghir, B.B.; Amor, I.B.; Kouadri, I.; Rebiai, A.; Messaoudi, M.; Ahmed, S.; Pohl, P.; Simal-Gandara, J. A review on biogenic green synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles by plant biomass and their applications. Mater. Today Commun. 2022, 33, 104747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naveenkumar, S.; Kamaraj, C.; Prem, P.; Raja, R.K.; Priyadharsan, A.; Alrefaei, A.F.; Govindarajan, R.K.; Thamarai, R.; Subramaniyan, V. Eco-friendly synthesis of palladium nanoparticles using Zaleya decandra: Assessing mosquito larvicidal activity, zebrafish embryo developmental toxicity, and impacts on freshwater sludge worm Tubifex tubifex. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2024, 12, 111912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shao, X.; Wu, X.; Liu, H.; Wang, P.; Du, C.F.; Wang, L.; Wang, H.; Yang, J. Effect of nano-particles ZnO and layered GO on high temperature tribological performance of MoS2-based heterojunction composite lubricating coating. J. Mater. Sci. 2024, 59, 19855–19874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pandey, R.K.; Choi, H.; Yi, J.; Heo, J.; Sahu, P.K. Facile controlled synthesis of bifunctional ZnO nanoparticles for application as a high-performance self-powered UV photosensor and highly selective vapor sensor. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2023, 293, 116470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rafee, V.; Razaghizadeh, A.; Nakhaei, R.; Hosini, R. Eco-friendly dye-sensitized solar cells: Green synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles using Sargassum algae and performance enhancement through optimized dye combinations. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2025, 317, 118164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sedefoglu, N.; Veryer, K.; Zalaoglu, D.; Bozok, F. Antibacterial and photocatalytic performances of bioactive In-doped ZnO nanoparticles. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2025, 313, 117914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, S.P.L.; Avinash, D. Review on effect of Ti-alloy processing techniques on surface-integrity for biomedical application. Mater. Manuf. Process. 2020, 35, 869–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, S.; Bala, N.; Kaur, A. Thermal spray coatings: For industrial and biomedical applications. Surf. Eng. 2026, 42, 486–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, L.K.; Wu, J.J.; Wu, W.Y.; Cao, F.H.; Jiang, M.Y. Sol–gel-based coatings for oxidation protection of TiAl alloys. J. Mater. Sci. 2020, 55, 6330–6351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Assender, H.; Bliznyuk, V.; Porfyrakis, K. How Surface Topography Relates to Materials’ Properties. Science 2002, 297, 973–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, M.K.; Chung, D.D.L. Inductance-based sensing of surface roughness, with application to wear sensing. J. Mater. Sci. 2024, 59, 15816–15829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paknahad, H.; Nogorani, F.S. Effects of substrate roughness on the surface morphology and corrosion properties of Fe- and Ni-aluminide coatings on martensitic stainless steel. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2020, 392, 125761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alla, R.K.; Ginjupalli, K.; Upadhya, N.; Shammas, M.; Ravi, R.K.; Sekhar, R. Surface roughness of implants: A review. Trends Biomater. Artif. Organs 2011, 25, 112–118. [Google Scholar]
- Mozammel, M.; Khajeh, M.; Ilkhechi, N.N. Effect of Surface Roughness of 316 L Stainless Steel Substrate on the Morphological and Super-Hydrophobic Property of TiO2 Thin Films Coatings. Silicon 2018, 10, 2603–2607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sigma-Aldrich. Xanthan gum from Xanthomonas campestris (CAS No. 11138-66-2). Available online: https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/JP/ja/product/sigma/43708?srsltid=AfmBOooISU7AoTd1Ne-ApFqGBm6aP8PDQksi-TPJNWTIZNqGJAaEmgJh (accessed on 10 June 2026).
- Pace, V.; Sinisterra, J.V.; Alcantara, A.R. Celite-Supported Reagents in Organic Synthesis: An Overview. Curr. Org. Chem. 2010, 14, 2384–2408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Altınsoy, Ş.; Üllen, N.B.; Ersoy, M.; Can, D. Machining Performance of Uncoated and Carbide Coated Cutting Inserts in Ti6Al4V Turning: An Experimental and Numerical Approach. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2024, 34, 4458–4476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pramanik, A.; Littlefair, G. Machining of Titanium Alloy (Ti-6Al-4V)—Theory to Application. Mach. Sci. Technol. 2015, 19, 1–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cwickel, D.; Paz, Y.; Marmur, A. Contact angle measurement on rough surfaces: The missing link. Surf. Innov. 2017, 5, 190–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kubiak, K.J.; Wilson, M.C.T.; Mathia, T.G.; Carval, P. Wettability versus roughness of engineering surfaces. Wear 2011, 271, 523–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Söz, C.K.; Yilgör, E.; Yilgör, I. Influence of the average surface roughness on the formation of superhydrophobic polymer surfaces through spin-coating with hydrophobic fumed silica. Polymer 2015, 62, 118–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zha, X.; Qin, H.; Yuan, Z.; Xi, L.; Zhang, T.; Jiang, F. Effect of cutting feed rate on machining performance and surface integrity in cutting process of Ti-6Al-4V alloy. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2023, 131, 2791–2809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chelaru, J.D.; Muresan, L.M. Mercapto-5-acetylamino-1,3,4-thiadiazole as corrosion inhibitor for a naturally patinated monumental bronze artifact. Stud. Univ. Babeș-Bolyai Chem. 2014, 59, 91–102. [Google Scholar]
- Mousavi, S.M.; Behbudi, G.; Gholami, A.; Hashemi, S.A.; Nejad, Z.M.; Bahrani, S.; Chiang, W.H.; Wei, L.C.; Omidifar, N. Shape-controlled synthesis of zinc nanostructures mediating macromolecules for biomedical applications. Biomater. Res. 2022, 26, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lee, S.; Jeong, S.; Kim, D.; Hwang, S.; Jeon, M.; Moon, J. ZnO nanoparticles with controlled shapes and sizes prepared using a simple polyol synthesis. Superlattices Microstruct. 2008, 43, 330–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Üllen, N.B.; Şevk, G.K.; Özarslan, A.C.; Kuçak, M. Surface integrity-dependent nanoparticle coating efficiency: Exploring sonochemically synthesized Zingiber officinale extract-based ZnO nanoparticles on Ti6Al4V. J. Mater. Sci. 2025, 60, 16328–16350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, H.; Markina, A.A.; Porotnikov, M.V.; Ahmad, F. A review of carbon fiber materials in automotive industry. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 971, 032011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karakus, S.; Tan, E.; Ilgar, M.; Sahin, Y.M.; Mansuroglu, D.S.; Ismik, D.; Somroo, R.A.; Kilislioglu, A. Swelling behaviour, rheological property and drug release profile of the anti-inflammatory drug metamizole sodium from xanthan gum–ZnO nanoparticles. Polym. Bull. 2022, 79, 357–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Srivastava, V.; Gusain, D.; Sharma, Y.C. Synthesis, characterization and application of zinc oxide nanoparticles (n-ZnO). Ceram. Int. 2013, 39, 9803–9808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahalakshmi, S.; Hema, N.; Vijaya, P.P. In Vitro Biocompatibility and Antimicrobial activities of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) Prepared by Chemical and Green Synthetic Route—A Comparative Study. Bionanoscience 2020, 10, 112–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalpana, V.N.; Rajeswari, V.D. A Review on Green Synthesis, Biomedical Applications, and Toxicity Studies of ZnO NPs. Bioinorg. Chem. Appl. 2018, 2018, 3569758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sangeetha, G.; Rajeshwari, S.; Venckatesh, R. Green synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles by aloe barbadensis miller leaf extract: Structure and optical properties. Mater. Res. Bull. 2011, 46, 2560–2566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kundu, D.; Hazra, C.; Chatterjee, A.; Chaudhari, A.; Mishra, S. Extracellular biosynthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles using Rhodococcus pyridinivorans NT2: Multifunctional textile finishing, biosafety evaluation and in vitro drug delivery in colon carcinoma. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2014, 140, 194–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Qian, Y.; Yao, J.; Russel, M.; Chen, K.; Wang, X. Characterization of green synthesized nano-formulation (ZnO–A. vera) and their antibacterial activity against pathogens. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2015, 39, 736–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ali, K.; Dwivedi, S.; Azam, A.; Saquib, Q.; Al-Said, M.S.; Alkhedhairy, A.A.; Musarrat, J. Aloe vera extract functionalized zinc oxide nanoparticles as nanoantibiotics against multi-drug resistant clinical bacterial isolates. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2016, 472, 145–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rasouli, R.; Barhoum, A.; Uludag, H. A review of nanostructured surfaces and materials for dental implants: Surface coating, patterning and functionalization for improved performance. Biomater. Sci. 2018, 6, 1312–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, J.; Wu, Y.; Cao, Y.; Li, G.; Liao, Y. Influence of surface roughness on contact angle hysteresis and spreading work. Colloid Polym. Sci. 2020, 298, 1107–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Croll, S.G. Surface roughness profile and its effect on coating adhesion and corrosion protection: A review. Prog. Org. Coat. 2020, 148, 105847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wen, G.; Guo, Z.; Liu, W. Biomimetic polymeric superhydrophobic surfaces and nanostructures: From fabrication to applications. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 3338–3366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Singhatanadgit, W. Biological Responses to New Advanced Surface Modifications of Endosseous Medical Implants. Bone Tissue Regen. Insights 2009, 2, BTRI.S3150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bathomarco, R.V.; Solorzano, G.; Elias, C.N.; Prioli, R. Atomic force microscopy analysis of different surface treatments of Ti dental implant surfaces. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2004, 233, 29–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kilpadi, D.V.; Weimer, J.J.; Lemons, J.E. Effect of passivation and dry heat-sterilization on surface energy and topography of unalloyed titanium implants. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 1998, 135, 89–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Islam, M.S.; Tong, L.; Falzon, P.J. Influence of metal surface preparation on its surface profile, contact angle, surface energy and adhesion with glass fibre prepreg. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2014, 51, 32–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bharathidasan, T.; Kumar, S.V.; Bobji, M.S.; Chakradhar, R.P.S.; Basu, B.J. Effect of wettability and surface roughness on ice-adhesion strength of hydrophilic, hydrophobic and superhydrophobic surfaces. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 314, 241–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kietzig, A.M.; Hatzikiriakos, S.G.; Englezos, P. Patterned superhydrophobic metallic surfaces. Langmuir 2009, 25, 4821–4827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Üllen, N.B.; Karabulut, G.; Karakuş, S. Assessing the Surface Properties of Plant Extract-Based Silver Nanoparticle Coatings on 17–4 PH Stainless Steel Foams Using Artificial Intelligence-Supported RGB Analysis: A Comparative Study. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2023, 32, 10637–10654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matos, G.R.M. Surface Roughness of Dental Implant and Osseointegration. J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg. 2021, 20, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bandapalli, C.; Singh, K.K.; Sutaria, B.M.; Bhatt, D.V. Experimental investigation of machinability parameters in high-speed micro-end milling of titanium (grade-2). Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2016, 85, 2139–2153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sobieszczyk, S. Surface modifications of Ti and its alloys. Adv. Mater. Sci. 2010, 10, 29–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benardos, P.G.; Vosniakos, G.C. Predicting surface roughness in machining: A review. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 2003, 43, 833–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdelnasser, A.S.; Barakat, A.; Elsanabary, S.; Nassef, A. Relative Performance of Coated Ceramic and CBN Inserts in Hard Turning of Ti6Al4V Alloy. Port-Said Eng. Res. J. 2020, 24, 114–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Albrektsson, T.; Wennerberg, A. Oral implant surfaces: Part 1—Review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2004, 17, 536–543. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Jiang, P.; Zhang, Y.; Hu, R.; Shi, B.; Zhang, L.; Huang, Q.; Yang, Y.; Tang, P.; Lin, C. Advanced surface engineering of titanium materials for biomedical applications: From static modification to dynamic responsive regulation. Bioact. Mater. 2023, 27, 15–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ball, M.; Grant, D.M.; Lo, W.J.; Scotchford, C.A. The effect of different surface morphology and roughness on osteoblast-like cells. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2008, 86A, 637–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Caio, F.; Moreau, C. Influence of Substrate Shape and Roughness on Coating Microstructure in Suspension Plasma Spray. Coatings 2019, 9, 746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, J.; Shah, S.; Thomas, A.; Ou-Yang, H.D.; Liu, Y. The influence of size, shape and vessel geometry on nanoparticle distribution. Microfluid. Nanofluidics 2013, 14, 77–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Capco, D.G.; Chen, Y. (Eds.) Nanomaterial; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2014; Volume 811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bernard, B.; Bianchi, L.; Malié, A.; Joulia, A.; Rémy, B. Columnar suspension plasma sprayed coating microstructural control for thermal barrier coating application. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2016, 36, 1081–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gurzawska, K.; Svava, R.; Syberg, S.; Yihua, Y.; Haugshøj, K.B.; Damager, I.; Ulvskov, P.; Christensen, L.H.; Gotfredsen, K.; Jørgensen, N.R. Effect of nanocoating with rhamnogalacturonan-I on surface properties and osteoblasts response. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2012, 100A, 654–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Altlnsoy, Ş.; Erkan, S.; Üllen, N.B.; Ateş, S.C.; Evcil, N. Evaluation of surface properties of modified Ti6Al4V alloy with copper nanoparticles organic nanostructure for biomedical applications: Dependency on anticorrosive, antibacterial, and biocompatibility. Corros. Rev. 2025, 43, 361–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perumal, P.; Ramanathan, K.; Ganesan, L.; Subramanian, B.; Ganesh, V.; Stalin, B. Investigation of TiN coating uniformity and its corrosion behaviour using image process. Mater. Res. Express 2019, 6, 046411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saidi, R.; Raeissi, K.; Ashrafizadeh, F.; Kharaziha, M. The effect of zinc oxide coating morphology on corrosion performance of Ti-6Al-4 V alloys. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 883, 160771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thakur, V.K.; Thakur, M.K.; Kessler, M.R. (Eds.) Handbook of Composites from Renewable Materials, Functionalization; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Wennerberg, A.; Albrektsson, T. Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: A systematic review. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2009, 20, 172–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gao, C.; Li, C.; Wang, C.; Qin, Y.; Wang, Z.; Yang, F.; Liu, H.; Chang, F.; Wang, J. Advances in the induction of osteogenesis by zinc surface modification based on titanium alloy substrates for medical implants. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 726, 1072–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajesh, Y.; Purkayastha, D.D.; Krishna, M.G. Seed layer mediated wettability and wettability transition of ZnO nano/micro-rod arrays. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 857, 157617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Creus, J.; Mazille, H.; Idrissi, H. Porosity evaluation of protective coatings onto steel, through electrochemical techniques. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2000, 130, 224–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mulijani, S.; Rizky, G.; Wulanawati, A.; Handayani, A.W.; Asih, F.N. Synthesis of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticle as Corrosion Resistance of Steel Metal. AIP Conf. Proc. 2022, 2638, 020006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, N.; Gao, H.; Wang, X.; Pei, X. Surface Modification of Titanium Implants by Metal Ions and Nanoparticles for Biomedical Application. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2023, 9, 2970–2990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Woźniak-Budych, M.J.; Staszak, M.; Staszak, K. A critical review of dental biomaterials with an emphasis on biocompatibility. Dent. Med. Probl. 2023, 60, 709–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kuang, J.; Ba, Z.; Li, Z.; Wang, Z.; Qiu, J. The study on corrosion resistance of superhydrophobic coatings on magnesium. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 501, 144137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trentin, A.; Samiee, R.; Pakseresht, A.H.; Duran, A.; Castro, Y.; Galusek, D. Influence of pre-treatments on adhesion, barrier and mechanical properties of epoxy coatings: A comparison between steel, AA7075 and AA2024. Appl. Surf. Sci. Adv. 2023, 18, 100479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amiriafshar, M.; Rafieazad, M.; Duan, X.; Nasiri, A. Fabrication and Coating Adhesion Study of Superhydrophobic Stainless Steel Surfaces: The Effect of Substrate Surface Roughness. Surf. Interfaces 2020, 20, 100526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Wang, H.; Li, J.; He, X.; Hang, R.; Huang, X.; Tian, L.; Tang, B. Corrosion behavior of Zn-incorporated antibacterial TiO2 porous coating on titanium. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 17095–17100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]








| Sample Code | XG (g) | CE (g) | Zn(NO3)2·6H2O (g) | Sonication Time (min) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XG/CE-ZnO NPs | 0.025 | 0.03 | 0.297 | 30 |
| XG/CE-ZnO (1) | 0.025 | 0.01 | 0.297 | 30 |
| XG/CE-ZnO (2) | 0.025 | 0.02 | 0.297 | 30 |
| XG/CE-ZnO (3) | 0.025 | 0.05 | 0.297 | 30 |
| Sample Code | Uncoated, μm | Coated, μm | Difference, % |
|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 1.25 ± 0.13 | 1.11 ± 0.11 | −11.2 |
| R2 | 1.86 ± 0.18 | 1.55 ± 0.19 | −16.6 |
| R3 | 2.20 ± 0.24 | 1.89 ± 0.17 | −14.1 |
| Sample Code | Uncoated Surface | Coated Surface | Increase (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | ![]() 308.4 ± 10.5 HV1 | ![]() 358.3 ± 11.7 HV1 | 16.2 |
| R2 | ![]() 337.6 ± 13.7 HV1 | ![]() 367.7 ± 14.3 HV1 | 8.9 |
| R3 | ![]() 354.5 ± 13.7 HV1 | ![]() 376.4 ± 13.9 HV1 | 6.2 |
| Sample Code | OCP (V) | Ecorr (mV) | Icorr (µA/cm2) | Protection Efficiency P.E. (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bare R1 | −0.339 | −243 | 4.163 | - |
| Bare R2 | −0.362 | −273 | 6.849 | - |
| Bare R3 | −0.388 | −315 | 8.438 | - |
| XG/CE-ZnO R1 | −0.144 | −54.3 | 0.063 | %98.48 |
| XG/CE-ZnO R2 | −0.181 | −80.4 | 0.125 | %98.17 |
| XG/CE-ZnO R3 | −0.22 | −150 | 0.406 | %95.18 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Altınsoy, Ş.; Beköz Üllen, N.; Karabulut Şevk, G.; Karakuş, S. Surface Roughness-Dependent Morphology and Corrosion Protection of Polymeric–Ceramic ZnO Nanocoatings on Ti6Al4V Alloys. Coatings 2026, 16, 823. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings16070823
Altınsoy Ş, Beköz Üllen N, Karabulut Şevk G, Karakuş S. Surface Roughness-Dependent Morphology and Corrosion Protection of Polymeric–Ceramic ZnO Nanocoatings on Ti6Al4V Alloys. Coatings. 2026; 16(7):823. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings16070823
Chicago/Turabian StyleAltınsoy, Şakir, Nuray Beköz Üllen, Gizem Karabulut Şevk, and Selcan Karakuş. 2026. "Surface Roughness-Dependent Morphology and Corrosion Protection of Polymeric–Ceramic ZnO Nanocoatings on Ti6Al4V Alloys" Coatings 16, no. 7: 823. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings16070823
APA StyleAltınsoy, Ş., Beköz Üllen, N., Karabulut Şevk, G., & Karakuş, S. (2026). Surface Roughness-Dependent Morphology and Corrosion Protection of Polymeric–Ceramic ZnO Nanocoatings on Ti6Al4V Alloys. Coatings, 16(7), 823. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings16070823







