Next Article in Journal
High-Volume Phosphogypsum Road Base Materials
Previous Article in Journal
Surface Friction and Interfacial Wear Mechanisms in CeO2-Ni/WC Cladding Layers on 45 Steel
Previous Article in Special Issue
Annealing Treatment of Al2CoCrFeNi High-Entropy Alloys: Synergistic Effect of Microstructure Modulation on Mechanical and Thermoelectric Properties
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Coatings
Volume 15
Issue 9
10.3390/coatings15091039
coatings-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Cyclic Oxidation Behavior and Protective Oxide Scale Formation in Stainless-Steel Alloys for High-Temperature Exhaust Valve Applications

by
Salih Bilal Çetinkal
1,*,
Mehmet Şahin Ataş
2,
Emin Salur
1,
İlyas Şavklıyıldız
2,
Halit Sübütay
1,
Gökhan Arıcı
1,
Abdulaziz Kurdi
3,4,
Ahmed Degnah
3,* and
Abdulaziz AlHazaa
5
1
Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Technology Faculty, Selcuk University, Konya 42075, Turkey
2
Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Konya Technical University, Konya 42075, Turkey
3
Advanced Materials Technology Institute, King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, Riyadh 11442, Saudi Arabia
4
The Center of Excellence for Advanced Materials and Manufacturing, King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, Riyadh 11442, Saudi Arabia
5
King Abdullah Institute for nanotechnology, King Saud University, Riyadh 1145, Saudi Arabia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2025, 15(9), 1039; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15091039
Submission received: 7 August 2025 / Revised: 25 August 2025 / Accepted: 2 September 2025 / Published: 5 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced High Entropy Alloy Materials and Films: Properties and Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

As internal combustion engine (ICE) systems are increasingly exposed to severe thermal and oxidative environments, the oxidation resistance and structural integrity of exhaust valve materials have become critical for maintaining long-term engine reliability and efficiency. This study presents a comparative evaluation of the cyclic oxidation behavior of two candidate valve steels, 1.4718 (ferritic stainless steel) and 1.4871 (austenitic stainless steel), under service-temperature conditions. The specimens were exposed to repeated oxidation at 550 °C, 650 °C and 750 °C for 25 cycles in ambient air. The surface and cross-sectional morphologies of the oxide layers were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) to investigate oxide scale composition, thickness, and growth characteristics. The oxidation behavior of both alloys proceeded in two distinct stages: an initial phase marked by accelerated oxidation, followed by a slower, more stable growth period. The extent of oxidation intensified with increasing temperature. The 1.4718 alloy developed relatively porous but compositionally stable oxide layers consisting primarily of Fe- and Cr-based spinels such as FeCr2O4 and Cr2SiO4. In contrast, the 1.4871 alloy formed a dense, adherent, dual-layered oxide scale composed of an outer Mn2O3-rich layer and an inner Cr2O3-rich layer, attributable to its high Mn and Cr content. The results underscore the critical influence of elemental composition, particularly Cr, Mn and Si, on oxide scale stability and spallation resistance, demonstrating the superior cyclic oxidation resistance of the 1.4871 alloy and its potential suitability for exhaust valve applications in thermally aggressive environments.

1. Introduction

With the continuous advancement of internal combustion engine (ICE) technologies, the durability, working-temperature wear characteristics, mechanical properties, and oxidation resistance of valves and their assemblies operating under severe tribological and thermal conditions have become increasingly vital. In ICE systems, materials employed in valves and their corresponding seat inserts comprise a tribological pair exposed to combined cyclic impact and sliding contact, resulting from combustion pressure and valve motion dynamics [1,2,3,4]. Particularly, exhaust valves are exposed to combustion pressures exceeding 20 MPa and temperatures reaching up to 650 °C, while intake valves operate at temperatures up to 350 °C [5,6,7,8]. Under these elevated thermal and mechanical loads, repeated stress and thermal cycling significantly accelerate surface degradation, ultimately leading to the failure of the valve–seat assembly and a consequential decline in engine performance and efficiency [3,9,10,11].
The high-temperature performance of valve materials is largely governed by their stability, adherence, and protective surface oxides and to retain microstructural stability under thermal cycling. Therefore, ferritic and austenitic stainless steels are frequently employed in valve applications thanks to their favorable integrated oxidation-resistant performance, mechanical strength, and cost-effectiveness [12,13,14,15,16,17]. Among these, 1.4718 ferritic stainless steel, with its chromium and silicon content, supports the development of Cr-rich and Si-rich oxide layers, whereas 1.4871 austenitic stainless steel, with high chromium (~21 wt.%) and manganese (~10 wt.%) levels, facilitates the formation of dense, multi-layered oxide scales that enhance oxidation resistance in high-temperature environments [1,4,18,19,20]. The oxidation behavior of these alloys is strongly governed by their elemental composition and the type of oxides they promote. Chromium is well recognized for promoting the formation of a stable and adherent Cr2O3 scale, which serves as an effective barrier against further oxidation [12,13,14,20,21,22,23]. Manganese in austenitic steels contributes to the formation of Mn-rich oxides such as MnCr2O4 spinel and Mn2O3 (corundum structure), which improve scale integrity and adhesion, especially during cyclic conditions [24,25,26,27]. Silicon, on the other hand, enhances oxidation resistance in ferritic steels by forming Si-containing oxide sublayers at the metal/oxide interface, which suppress outward diffusion of metal cations and inward diffusion of oxygen. These synergistic effects contribute significantly to the long-term cyclic oxidation resistance of high-temperature steels [28,29].
Numerous studies have highlighted the influence of these alloying elements on high-temperature oxidation behavior. Lins et al. [30] observed that Fe–Cr ferritic alloys formed Cr2O3 scales with good spallation resistance under cyclic oxidation. Kumar and Mahobia [24] demonstrated that the presence of high Mn content in Fe–Cr–Mn–N austenitic steels promoted the formation of protective Mn-containing spinels. Similarly, da Silva et al. [31] announced that the implementation of Si to Fe–Cr alloys improved oxide layer adherence and reduced the oxidation rate. Singh et al. [32] found that low-Ni austenitic steels formed multilayered M2O3 and M3O4 oxides under cyclic oxidation, thereby enhancing thermal stability.
Based on the aforementioned literature review, various studies have investigated the individual oxidation behavior of heat-resistant steels, focusing on factors such as oxide layer adhesion, spallation resistance, and oxide phase composition. Nevertheless, the majority of these investigations focus on individual alloys or general alloy categories, without providing a direct, systematic comparison of these two widely utilized grades under uniform testing conditions. In this regard, a direct and comprehensive comparison between the oxidation resistance of 1.4871 and 1.4718 stainless steel remains unexplored in the current literature. This study uniquely addresses this gap by systematically investigating and comparing the cyclic oxidation behavior of 1.4871 and 1.4718 stainless steels under identical thermal conditions (550 °C, 650 °C and 750 °C) over 25 thermal cycles. Advanced microstructural characterization techniques, including SEM, EDS (point, line, and mapping), and XRD, were employed to examine the microstructural developments, composition, and phase evolution of the formed oxide scales. The outcomes are expected to provide valuable insights into the relationship between alloy composition and oxidation mechanisms, thereby aiding in the selection of valve materials for high-temperature ICE applications.

2. Experimental Procedure

2.1. Sample Selection and Procurement

The materials examined in this study, X53CrMnNiN21-9 (austenitic stainless steel), and X45CrSi9-3 (ferritic stainless steel), were procured in rod form, each with a diameter of 10 mm and a length of 15 cm, from Cogne Edelstahl GmbH (Neuss, Germany). The nominal compositions of these alloys are presented in Table 1.

2.2. Cyclic Oxidation Testing Procedure

To evaluate the service-temperature oxidation resistance of the selected alloys, cyclic oxidation tests were carried out under controlled laboratory conditions. Disk-shaped specimens, 2 mm in thickness, were sectioned from the rods using a precision cutting machine (Micracut 201, Metkon, Bursa, Turkey). Surface preparation involved sequential grinding with SiC abrasive papers up to 2000 grit, followed by final polishing with 1 μm alumina (Al2O3) paste to achieve a mirror-like finish. After polishing, the specimens were ultrasonically cleaned in acetone and subsequently air-dried at room temperature. According to an extensive literature review, the typical operating temperature of engine valves is approximately 650 °C [1,4,33]. Accordingly, the alloys’ oxidation behavior was evaluated at 550 °C, 650 °C and 750 °C to simulate real service conditions and investigate temperature-dependent oxidation behavior.
The cyclic oxidation tests were conducted in a controlled laboratory furnace (Protherm PLF 130/9, 9 L capacity, Ankara, Turkey) under ambient atmospheric conditions. Each thermal cycle involved controlled heating and cooling phases to simulate service conditions. This thermal cycle was repeated 25 times for each test condition. A total of 25 oxidation cycle was selected to reflect the cyclic thermal exposure of exhaust valves in ICE. According to the literature [12,34], cyclic oxidation tests are generally extended by about 10 cycles after mass gain saturation to ensure steady-state conditions. In the present work, saturation was observed after 13–15 cycles; therefore, 25 cycles were adopted. The heating rate of the furnace was 20 °C/min. The cooling profile of the furnace (750 °C to room temperature in 20 min, (~40 °C/min) was also determined, providing a practical representation of service-like thermal stresses, although actual engine shutdown cooling may differ. Following the oxidation test, sample weights were recorded to determine mass gain. Post-experiment analysis involved phase identification of surface oxides via XRD (D8 Advance, Bruker, Biberach, Germany). Surface oxide layers were characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM, EVO LS10, Zeiss, Oberkochen Germany) coupled with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). The schematic test procedure is visualized in Figure 1.

3. Results and Discussion

In this study, the high-temperature oxidation behavior of two candidate alloys, 1.4718 and 1.4871, was systematically evaluated through cyclic oxidation testing. The experiments were conducted under laboratory conditions, with each cycle consisting of 1 h of isothermal exposure at 550 °C, 650 °C or 750 °C, followed by cooling to room temperature. All oxidation tests were performed in triplicate for each specimen to ensure reproducibility. The consistency of the oxidation kinetics is illustrated in Figure 2, where the mass-gain curves are presented together with their standard deviations. The curves revealed two different oxidation stages: an accelerated oxidation phase occurring during cycles 0–9, followed by a more gradual, steady-state growth phase from cycles 10–25. For both alloys, the total mass gain increased with the number of cycles and the test temperature, demonstrating the temperature dependence of the oxidation kinetics. The ferritic stainless steel 1.4718 showed a moderate increase in mass gain across the temperature range, with oxidation becoming more pronounced at higher temperatures. Notably, at 550 °C and 650 °C, the mass gain values of 1.4718 were comparable to those of 1.4871, suggesting similar oxidation behavior in the early to intermediate stages. However, at 750 °C, more pronounced divergence in oxidation resistance was observed between the two alloys, likely due to compositional differences, particularly in such as chromium, silicon and manganese, which strongly influence the development and stability of protective oxide scales.
Alloy 1.4871 displayed the lowest mass gain at all temperatures tested (Figure 2b), which is attributed to its relatively high Cr (>20 wt.%) and Mn (~10 wt.%) contents. These compositional features are known to enhance the formation of dense, stable, and adherent oxide layers that suppress further oxidation. The results suggest that increasing the Cr and Mn content significantly improves oxidation and spallation resistance by promoting the formation of protective Cr2O3-based oxide scales in both 1.4718 and 1.4871 alloys.
Further analysis of the cyclic oxidation behavior of alloys 1.4718 and 1.4871 was conducted using diffusion-controlled kinetics. The mass gain trends were interpreted using Wagner’s parabolic rate law, and Table 2 summarizes the related 1/n and parabolic rate constant (kp) values. The oxidation of 1.4871 alloy follows parabolic kinetics since the 1/n values (0.53, 0.60, and 0.50 at 550 °C, 650 °C and 750 °C, respectively) are around the optimal parabolic value of 0.5. While the general trend in 1.4718 is also diffusion-controlled, it shows consistently higher 1/n values (0.78, 0.76, 0.76), indicating slight deviations from perfect parabolic behavior. The temperature dependence of the oxidation rate is confirmed by the increase in kp values for both alloys with elevating temperature. EDS elemental mapping enabled the identification of distinct oxide scale layers. A continuous Cr2O3 layer developed at the metal-oxide interface, while the outer scale consisted primarily of Fe and Mn-containing spinel phases. This compositional stratification aligns with classical oxidation models, where Cr diffusion sustains the formation of a protective inner layer and the outward diffusion Fe and Mn drives the growth of spinel phases in the outer scale. Grain boundary and lattice diffusion paths were also compared to identify potential rate-limiting steps. The result, supported by literature-reported diffusion coefficients of Cr, Fe, and Mn, suggests that lattice diffusion promotes outer spinel formation, whereas Cr diffusion through the chromia layer probably regulates the overall oxidation rate [35]. Overall, these factors link the experimental results to established diffusion theories and provide a mechanistic explanation for the observed mass gain trends.
Figure 3 and Table 3 illustrate the surface oxide morphologies and corresponding chemical compositions of alloy 1.4718 following cyclic oxidation at three different temperatures. At 550 °C, only a very thin oxide layer developed on the surface, and no distinct morphological features were observed. Point EDS analysis indicated that the oxide scale was primarily composed of iron (Fe), with minor contributions from chromium (Cr) and oxygen (O) (Table 3). This suggests the initial formation of a simple, Fe-rich oxide scale under moderate thermal conditions. The minimal oxide growth at this temperature reflects the alloy’s high oxidation resistance at lower temperatures. At 650 °C, specimen surface was fully covered by a uniform, compact, and adherent oxide scale, as seen in the SEM images of Figure 3. From the examined surface region, the oxide layer appeared relatively dense and free of evident porosity, delamination, or spallation. While top-view SEM provides useful qualitative information, a more comprehensive assessment of porosity would ideally require complementary cross-sectional analysis. Across all analyzed regions, the morphology of the oxide scale was consistent, characterized by irregular, platelet-like structures with sharp edges and flat surfaces. EDS analysis confirmed that the oxide scale was composed of Fe, Cr and O, indicating the formation of mixed iron–chromium oxides (Table 3). Following oxidation at 750 °C, a more substantial growth of surface oxides was observed. These oxide structures became increasingly irregular and porous but remained uniformly distributed across the surface. Despite the porous nature of the oxide layer, it exhibited strong adhesion to the substrate, with no evidence of cracking or flaking. The chemical composition of the oxide scale, again consisting of Fe, Cr and O, suggested the formation of spinel-type oxides such as FeCr2O4 [21,22,36].
Alloy 1.4718 exhibited distinct oxidation behavior characterized by the formation of porous and morphologically heterogeneous oxide structures, particularly at 750 °C. Nevertheless, the oxide layers remained strongly adherent and free of cracks, thereby contributing to the overall oxidation stability of the alloy under cyclic exposure. The presence of spinel-type oxides such as FeCr2O4 at elevated temperatures indicates the formation of a Cr-rich protective scale. This spinel formation plays a critical role in enhancing the structural integrity and adhesion of the oxide scale, thereby improving the alloy’s resistance to thermal cycling.
Surface SEM-EDS mapping analyses of the 1.4718 alloy after cyclic oxidation at different temperatures are presented in Figure 4. Examination of the specimen oxidized at 550 °C reveals that Fe and Cr are widely distributed within the surface oxide layer, and O is also prominently detected. Consistent with the EDS results shown in Table 3, the mapping images confirm the existence of a Fe-rich oxide scale on the surface. These observations indicate that oxidation is at an early stage at this temperature. At 650 °C, although the oxide layer was relatively thin, it exhibited strong adhesion to the substrate. The observed increase in surface roughness was primarily attributed to the progressive thickening of the oxide layer formed during the oxidation process [37]. It has also been reported that Cr diffusion facilitated the formation of a more pronounced Cr2O3 layer, contributing to the thickening of the surface oxide scale. In the specimen subjected to cyclic oxidation at 750 °C, localized enrichment of Fe−O compounds were observed, while Cr−O species appeared to be uniformly and strongly distributed across the entire surface. This suggests the formation of a Cr-rich oxide sublayer at this temperature, consistent with Cr2O3. Although XRD did not reveal distinct Cr2O3 peaks, likely due to the thinness or poor crystallinity of this layer, EDS mapping indicates that Cr enrichment becomes more pronounced with increasing oxidation temperature.
Figure 5 and Table 4 illustrate the surface oxide morphologies and corresponding elemental compositions of alloy 1.4871 after cyclic oxidation at three different temperatures. Table 4 presents two distinct sets of data for each temperature: one corresponding to the surface oxide particles and the other to the suboxide layer found between these particles. At 550 °C, the oxidized surface exhibited a thin suboxide layer overlaid with spherical oxide particles. EDS analysis indicated that the particles were primarily composed of Fe and O, while the underlying sublayer contained Fe, Cr, and O. This suggests that Cr actively contributed to the formation of the suboxide layer, thereby improving oxidation resistance at low temperature. At 650 °C, the oxide scale fully covered the specimen surface, and the development of oxide particles with a distinct cauliflower-like morphology was observed. These particles were separated by visible inter-particle gaps, and internal rod- or beam-shaped structures were detected within the cauliflower clusters. At 550 °C, the oxide layer was composed predominantly of fine spherical particles. With increasing temperature, these features gradually coalesced into more complex cauliflower-like structures. This morphological evolution was consistently observed across all specimens, with the oxides generally exhibiting irregular, plate-like characteristics at higher magnifications, reflecting the typical growth behavior of mixed oxide scales. EDS results showed that the oxide particles were composed of Fe and O, whereas the suboxide regions contained Fe, Cr, Mn, and O, suggesting the presence of complex mixed oxides. Following oxidation at 750 °C, the general surface morphology remained similar to that at lower temperatures; however, a notable increase in the size of the cauliflower-like oxide particles was observed. This growth was attributed to enhanced diffusion kinetics at elevated temperatures, which facilitated the outward migration of elements with high oxygen affinity [26,38]. EDS analysis confirmed that these larger surface particles consisted entirely of Fe and O, corresponding to Fe2O3. The suboxide regions, in contrast, showed high concentrations of Fe, Cr, Mn, and O, consistent with the formation of spinel-type mixed oxides, possibly of the (Fe, Cr, Mn)3O4 type.
Compared to alloy 1.4718, and alloy 1.4871 exhibited distinct oxidation behavior in both surface morphology and chemical composition. While alloy 1.4718 developed porous but strongly adherent oxide layers primarily composed of Fe- and Cr-rich oxides, including spinel-type FeCr2O4, alloy 1.4871 formed more complex, multiphase oxide scales especially at 650 °C and 750 °C. These layers were characterized by Fe2O3-rich cauliflower-like structures on the surface and sublayers enriched in chromium (Cr) and manganese (Mn). The presence of Mn in 1.4871 played a significant role in the oxidation mechanism by promoting the formation of Mn-containing spinel phases, which may contribute to improved scale adherence and structural integrity under thermal cycling conditions. In summary, although higher temperatures led to thicker and more complex oxide structures in both alloys, the specific morphology and phases of the oxides were primarily governed by the elemental composition of each alloy.
Figure 6 illustrates the surface SEM-EDS elemental distribution maps for the 1.4871 alloy following cyclic oxidation tests conducted at three different temperatures. At 550 °C, a thin and discontinuous oxide layer suggested a relatively low oxidation rate. Surface analysis reveals the presence of oxide-forming elements such as Fe, Cr, and Mn. However, the dominance of Fe−O compounds suggested that Fe primarily contributed to the initial oxidation process. This behavior can be attributed to the faster outward diffusion kinetics of Fe relative to Cr, which promotes the preferential formation of Fe-rich oxides under the given conditions. Consequently, the preferential formation of Fe-rich oxides was more pronounced under these conditions. At 650 °C, the oxide particles showed significant growth, indicating a thermally accelerated oxidation mechanism. SEM-EDS mapping demonstrates that the diffusion rates of Fe, Mn and Cr were markedly enhanced, facilitating the development of complex oxide phases across the surface. In particular, manganese-based oxides became more distinguishable at this temperature, indicating a greater thermodynamic driving force for Mn migration and subsequent oxidation. At 750 °C, the oxidation process progresses further and resulted in the agglomeration and coalescence of oxide particles into a more continuous and compact scale. This morphological evolution was indicative of enhanced cationic mobility and increased reactivity of surface-active elements. The larger oxide particles observed on the surface of the 1.4871 alloy were primarily composed of Fe−O compounds, whereas the overall oxide scale exhibited an outer layer rich in MnO3, underlain by a sublayer enriched in CrO3. These thermodynamically stable oxide sublayers were primarily produced through the preferred migration of elements with high oxygen affinity, such as Cr and Mn, rather than the larger surface Fe-O particles. As also observed by Singh et al. [39], this behavior was consistent with SEM-EDS mapping and XRD analysis, demonstrating that the distribution and composition of the oxide scale are controlled by temperature-driven diffusion of reactive elements.
The investigation of surface oxides alone does not typically reflect the entire oxidation mechanism. In addition to surface oxide layers, internal oxidation products may also form beneath the surface oxide scale or just above the substrate alloy. In this study, cross-sectional analyses of the 1.4718 and 1.4871 alloys after oxidation at three different temperatures were performed using line scan, point and mapping EDS techniques. Point and mapping EDS were applied only at 750 °C to characterize the oxidation behavior of both alloys. Figure 7 presents the cross-sectional micrographs of the 1.4718 alloy after cyclic oxidation at three different temperatures. The oxide scale formed on 1.4718 remained relatively thin across all tested conditions. According to our findings, the 1.4718 alloy’s XRD analysis primarily revealed Fe peaks, with no clearly detectable oxide phases. However, line scan profiles and cross-sectional SEM-EDS confirmed that the oxide scale consists of Fe, Cr and O elements. Furthermore, increasing the oxidation temperature from 550 °C to 750 °C resulted in a roughly twofold increase in oxide layer thickness. This growth is attributed to the acceleration of diffusion processes at higher temperatures. Specifically, the formation and continuity of the oxide layer were promoted through the simultaneous diffusion of oxygen inward and the outward diffusion of Fe and Cr cations. These findings suggest that a temperature-dependent, diffusion-controlled mechanism governs the oxidation behavior of the 1.4718 alloy [15,16]. At 650 °C, the EDS results showed the presence of Fe, Cr, Si and O elements in the oxide layer. This observation is consistent with previous reports indicating the formation of Fe2O3 and complex spinel-type oxides such as Fe2SiO4 and Cr2SiO4, which are thermodynamically stable in this temperature range [28]. Similarly, EDS line scan analysis after oxidation at 750 °C revealed the presence of Fe, Cr and O, suggesting the continuation of spinel and chromia-based oxide formation at elevated temperatures. In order to more precisely identify the oxide phases and clearly differentiate the layered structure, EDS mapping was employed. This technique enabled the determination of oxide species present in the subsurface and at the metal/oxide interface with greater spatial resolution. At 750 °C, cross-sectional EDS mapping analysis was applied to the oxidized 1.4718 alloy to better characterize the oxide layers and identify the oxidation products as shown in Figure 8. The mapping results revealed a two-layered oxide structure. A composition dominated by Fe, Cr, Si and O was detected in the outer oxide region, while the interface between the oxide and base metal showed a thin layer rich in Fe and O.
According to the literature, iron’s strong chemical interaction with oxygen facilitates the initial nucleation and growth of Fe-oxides ahead of other alloying constituents during the early stages of the oxidation process [15,16,29,40]. This explains the observed enrichment of Fe at the metal/oxide interface, where Fe2O3 likely forms first. Subsequently, Cr and Si in the alloy contribute to the formation of a Fe−Cr−Si−O rich oxide scale in the outer region. This is indicative of the formation of a spinel-type oxide, most likely Cr2SiO4, which is known to form in Fe−Cr−Si alloys during high-temperature oxidation [41,42,43]. In agreement with these findings, Song’s thesis work also reported that Si-containing ferritic alloys tend to form spinel oxides such as Fe2SiO4 or Cr2SiO4, depending on the alloy composition and oxidation environment [44]. Thus, the presence of Cr and Si together with oxygen in the outer oxide layer strongly supports the formation of spinel-type Cr2SiO4 as the dominant oxidation product in this region.
The austenitic 1.4871 alloy was subjected to cyclic oxidation at 550 °C, 650 °C and 750 °C, and cross-sectional analyses are presented in Figure 9. EDS line scan results revealed that the oxide layer thickness at all three temperatures was significantly thinner compared to that of the 1.4718 alloy. This observation is consistent with the mass gain data obtained from thermogravimetric measurements, as earlier shown in Figure 2. With increasing temperature, microstructural changes were observed in the oxide scale, accompanied by a gradual increase in oxide thickness. Notably, at 650 °C and 750 °C, unlike in 1.4718, a distinct affected zone appeared at the metal/oxide interface. As described in the study by Pei et al., such oxidation-affected zones typically consist of two distinct regions: (i) a well-defined outer oxidation zone and (ii) a broader internal oxidation zone [45]. The internal oxidation region generally contains a mixture of fine oxide precipitates and a diffusion-affected metal matrix. In the current study, this two-region structure was clearly observed in the 1.4871 alloy, particularly at 650 °C and 750 °C.
At 550 °C, EDS line analysis of the oxidized 1.4871 alloy revealed the formation of a surface oxide consisting of Fe, Cr and O, which is attributed to the development of a protective FeCr2O4 layer. Unlike the 1.4718 alloy, where Fe-rich oxides predominate and the Cr contribution remains limited, the higher Cr content in 1.4871 promotes the formation of a more continuous and stable spinel oxide scale, representing a key distinction in oxidation behavior between the two alloys.
At 650 °C, the EDS results showed the presence of Fe, Cr, Mn and O elements within the oxide scale. This suggests the formation of thermodynamically stable oxides such as Fe2O3, Cr2O3 and Mn2O3, or the development of complex spinel phases such as FeCr2O4, Fe2MnO4, MnCr2O4, as well as mixed oxides formed from their combinations [46]. The presence of approximately 9 wt. % Mn in the alloy significantly influences its oxidation behavior. It is well established that in Fe-based austenitic alloys, manganese exhibits preferential oxidation behavior. Accordingly, oxide products such as Mn oxides, Fe oxides, Mn-Cr or Mn-Fe spinels have been reported under similar conditions [24,25,27,47,48].
At 750 °C, the EDS line scan analysis of the oxidized 1.4871 alloy exhibited a similar trend to that observed at 650 °C. However, to more precisely identify the oxide phases and distinguish the layered oxide structure, both EDS mapping and point analysis were conducted. These techniques enabled the identification of oxide species within the subsurface region and at the metal/oxide interface with improved spatial resolution.
Cross-sectional EDS mapping of the alloy oxidized at 750 °C was performed to better characterize the oxide layers and oxidation products (Figure 10). In addition, the oxide scale thickness of both alloys was quantitatively determined from SEM micrographs using the ImageJ 1.8.0 software. To obtain representative values, ten measurements were taken from different locations on each specimen. The mean values and standard deviations were calculated to evaluate the uniformity and reproducibility of the oxide scale thickness. The results are presented in Table 5, provided to aid in the interpretation of the cross-sectional EDS mapping results. The mapping results revealed a two-layered oxide structure. The outer oxide layer consisted mainly of Mn and O, while the thin inner layer located at the metal/oxide interface exhibited higher concentrations of Cr and O. The presence of Cr2O3 in the inner layer indicates the formation of a protective and thermodynamically stable oxide, which serves as a diffusion barrier and contributes to the alloy’s high-temperature oxidation resistance. The formation of Mn2O3 in the outer layer, together with Cr2O3 in the inner region, appears to enhance mechanical adhesion and mitigate thermal stresses at the metal/oxide interface due to the difference in thermal expansion coefficients between the oxide scale and the base metal [15,49,50,51]. This layered oxide morphology suggests that the coexistence of different oxide phases not only affects oxidation kinetics but also plays a critical role in stabilizing the metal/oxide interface under thermal cycling conditions.
Figure 11 presents the EDS point analysis results for the 1.4871 alloy. The measurement taken from the surface oxide layer revealed a high concentration of Mn and O, together with a considerable amount of Cr, indicating that the outer oxide layer is predominantly composed of a mixed oxide, (Mn,Cr)2O3. This observation is consistent with and further supports the results obtained from the EDS line scan and mapping analyses. The measurement performed at the metal/oxide interface showed a significant enrichment of Cr, suggesting the presence of Cr2O3 as the primary oxide phase in the inner layer. This finding confirms the formation of a Cr-rich protective oxide layer adjacent to the metal substrate. Both EDS point measurements corroborate the earlier line scan and elemental mapping data, clearly demonstrating that the oxide scale is composed of two distinct compositional layers. This layered oxide structure highlights the complex oxidation behavior of the alloy at elevated temperatures and provides valuable insights into the phase distribution across the oxide scale.
In the case of the 1.4718 alloy, no distinct oxide peaks were observed in the XRD patterns, which is likely due to the very thin nature of the oxide layer or its low crystallinity. The oxide phases in this alloy were therefore identified by SEM-EDS analysis. The oxidation behavior and phase evolution of 1.4718 ferritic stainless steel under cyclic and isothermal oxidation conditions have been extensively studied in the literature. Different reports [52,53,54] have confirmed that the Cr and Si content in this alloy promotes the formation of Cr2O3 and internal SiO2 phases, depending on temperature and atmosphere. As for the 1.4871 alloy, it exhibits complex oxide formation involving Cr2O3, spinel-type oxides such as (Mn,Fe)Cr2O4, and possible hematite (Fe2O3), whose relative distribution and crystallographic identification are critical for performance assessment. Given this well-established oxidation mechanism, this paper focuses on the XRD analysis of the 1.4871 austenitic steel, for which phase evolution under cyclic oxidation conditions is comparatively less reported, particularly in the context of long-term exposure.
The XRD analysis results employed to identify the surface phases formed on the oxide layer of the 1.4871 alloy after cyclic oxidation are presented in Figure 12. In the patterns, the principal diffraction peaks were annotated with their specific 2θ positions and Miller indices, providing clearer evidence for phase identification. The findings indicate that both the type and relative amount of oxide phases that formed were strongly influenced by the oxidation temperature. Similar trends were also noted in the study by Liu et al. [54]. To support phase identification and enable a more rigorous evaluation, the principal 2θ positions and corresponding relative intensities of the detected main oxide phases are summarized in Table 6. As for the 1.4871 alloy subjected to oxidation at different temperatures, Fe2O3 and Mn2O3 were identified as the dominant oxide phases. It was observed that these phases progressively developed with increasing oxidation temperature. At lower temperatures, Fe2O3 was the predominant phase. Similar results were reported in the works of Liu [54] and Aryanto [52], where Fe2O3 was identified as the dominant oxide phase at relatively lower oxidation temperatures. However, at 750 °C, the intensity of Fe2O3 peaks decreases while reflections corresponding to Mn2O3 become more pronounced. This phase transition is associated with the accelerated outward diffusion of Mn at elevated temperatures. SEM–EDS line scan results (Figure 9) further confirm that the oxide scale thickens with increasing temperature, a trend that is particularly pronounced at 750 °C due to the contribution of the Mn-enriched Mn2O3 outer layer. In addition, while only Fe2O3 was observed at 650 °C, the simultaneous presence of Fe2O3 and Cr2O3 in the inner layer and Mn2O3 in the outer layer at 750 °C enhances the diversity of oxide products, thereby leading to an increase in overall scale thickness. Accordingly, the intensified Mn2O3 reflections observed in the XRD spectrum at 750 °C not only indicate a phase transformation but also reflect the development of a thicker and thermodynamically more stable oxide scale structure resulting from phase diversification and volumetric contributions.

4. Conclusions

Based on a comprehensive evaluation of the cyclic oxidation behavior of ferritic stainless steel 1.4718 and austenitic stainless steel 1.4871 under varying thermal conditions, several key conclusions can be drawn about their oxidation kinetics, scale morphologies, and service-temperature performance. These findings provide meaningful insights into selecting suitable materials for exhaust valve applications in internal combustion engines (ICEs).
Both alloys exhibited a two-stage oxidation pattern, characterized by an initial rapid mass gain followed by a slower, steady-state oxidation stage. As the temperature increased from 550 °C to 750 °C, both the oxide scale thickness and total mass gain simultaneously increased, confirming the temperature dependence of oxidation kinetics.
The ferritic stainless steel 1.4718 developed oxide layers rich in Fe and Cr, including spinel-type FeCr2O4 and Cr2SiO4 phases. Although the resulting oxide scales were relatively porous, they retained strong adhesion and structural stability throughout thermal cycling, thereby offering moderate oxidation resistance under service-temperature conditions.
The results indicate that alloy 1.4871 exhibits superior oxidation resistance compared to alloy 1.4718. This behavior is attributed to its higher Cr and Mn contents, which promote the formation of a dual-layer oxide structure consisting of an outer Mn2O3-rich layer and an inner Cr2O3-rich layer. This configuration enhances scale adherence, minimizes spallation, and limits elemental diffusion.
For the 1.4871 austenitic stainless steel, XRD analysis revealed a temperature-dependent phase evolution: Fe2O3 dominated at lower oxidation temperatures, while Mn2O3 reflections became increasingly pronounced at 750 °C due to accelerated Mn outward diffusion. At this temperature, the coexistence of Fe2O3, Mn2O3, and Cr-rich oxides contributed to the development of a thicker and thermodynamically more stable oxide scale.
In conclusion, alloy 1.4871 emerges as the most promising candidate for exhaust valve applications operating under cyclic thermal environments. Its capacity to develop dense, stable, and adherent oxide scales during prolonged high-temperature exposure underscores its suitability for demanding ICE conditions involving both thermal and mechanical stresses.

Author Contributions

S.B.Ç.: writing—review and editing; writing—original draft; methodology; investigation; formal analysis and data curation; conceptualization. M.Ş.A.: writing—review and editing; writing—original draft; methodology; investigation; formal analysis; data curation and conceptualization. E.S.: writing—original draft; investigation; formal analysis; data curation and conceptualization. İ.Ş.: methodology; investigation; formal analysis and data curation. H.S.: methodology; investigation; formal analysis and data curation. G.A.: methodology; investigation; formal analysis and data curation. A.K.: investigation, formal analysis and data curation. A.D.: investigation; formal analysis and data curation. A.A.: formal analysis and data curation. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Research Institute Supporting Program (RICSP-25−1), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the first author on request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the Research Institute Supporting Program (RICSP-25-1), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Atapour, M.; Ashrafizadeh, F. Tribology and cyclic oxidation behavior of plasma nitrided valve steel. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2008, 202, 4922–4929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Romedenne, M.; Haynes, A.; Pillai, R. Cyclic oxidation behavior of selected commercial NiCr-alloys for engine exhaust valves in wet air environment between 800 and 950 °C. Corros. Sci. 2023, 211, 110817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Alano, J.H.; Siqueira, R.L.; Martins Júnior, C.B.; Silva, R.; Vacchi, G.d.S.; Rovere, C.A.D. A Survey on the Oxidation Behavior of a Nickel-Based Alloy Used in Natural Gas Engine Exhaust Valve Seats. Metals 2022, 13, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Atapour, M.; Ashrafizadeh, F. Cyclic oxidation behavior of plasma nitrided valve steel. Phys. Procedia 2012, 32, 853–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cerdoun, M.; Carcasci, C.; Ghenaiet, A. An approach for the thermal analysis of internal combustion engines’ exhaust valves. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2016, 102, 1095–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cerdoun, M.; Khalfallah, S.; Beniaiche, A.; Carcasci, C. Investigations on the heat transfer within intake and exhaust valves at various engine speeds. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2020, 147, 119005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Khan, M.I.; Khan, M.A.; Shakoor, A. A failure analysis of the exhaust valve from a heavy duty natural gas engine. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2018, 85, 77–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Vychavka, A.; Dykha, O.; Hetman, M. Analysis of tribological aspects during operation and repair of internal combustion engine valve mechanism parts. Probl. Tribol. 2024, 29, 37–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lou, M.; Alpas, A. High temperature wear mechanisms in thermally oxidized titanium alloys for engine valve applications. Wear 2019, 426, 443–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pillai, R.; Dryepondt, S.; Armstrong, B.L.; Lance, M.J.; Muralidharan, G. Evaluating the efficacy of aluminide coatings to improve oxidation resistance of high performance engine valve alloys. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2021, 421, 127401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pillai, R.; Romedenne, M.; Haynes, J.A.; Pint, B.A. Oxidation behavior of candidate NiCr alloys for engine exhaust valves: Part I—Effect of minor alloying elements. Oxid. Met. 2021, 95, 157–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Atas, M.S.; Yildirim, M. Temporal evolution, coarsening behavior and oxidation resistance of Ni–15Al superalloy. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 809, 151784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Atas, M.S.; Yildirim, M. Morphological development, coarsening, and oxidation behavior of Ni-Al-Nb superalloys. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2020, 29, 4421–4434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Atas, M.S.; Yildirim, M. Structural properties and cyclic oxidation behavior of Ni-Al-Y superalloys. Met. Mater. Kov. Mater. 2022, 60, 281–292. [Google Scholar]
  15. Demirel, A.; Çetin, E.C.; Karakuş, A.; Ataş, M.Ş.; Yildirim, M. Microstructural Evolution and oxidation BEhavior of fe-4cr-6ti fErritic alloy with fe2ti lavEs PhasE PrEciPitatEs. Arch. Metall. Mater. 2022, 67, 827–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yildirim, M.; Atas, M.S.; Akdeniz, M.V.; Mekhrabov, A.O. Effect of Y Addition on the Structural Properties and Oxidation Behavior of Fe60Al40-nYn Alloys (n = 1, 3, and 5 at.%). Mater. High Temp. 2022, 39, 220–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Salur, E. Understandings the tribological mechanism of Inconel 718 alloy machined under different cooling/lubrication conditions. Tribol. Int. 2022, 174, 107677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Uzkut, M.; Ünlü, B.S.; Akdağ, M. Determination of optimum welding parameters in connecting high alloyed X53CrMnNiN219 and X45CrSi93 steels by friction welding. Bull. Mater. Sci. 2011, 34, 815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  19. Yong, M.; Ku, P. Study on the performance characteristics and failure analysis of exhaust valves. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2023, 2523, 012047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sakiyan, S.; Sabet, H.; Abbasi, M. Characterization of mechanical properties in X45CrSi9-3/Nimonic 80A welded by friction welding. Int. J. Steel Struct. 2017, 17, 319–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Benhalima, C.; Amari, S.; Beldi, L.; Bouhafs, B. First-principles study of ferromagnetism in iron chromite spinels: FeCr2O4 and CrFe2O4. Spin 2019, 9, 1950014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Boudjemaa, A.; Bouarab, R.; Saadi, S.; Bouguelia, A.; Trari, M. Photoelectrochemical H2-generation over Spinel FeCr2O4 in X2− solutions (X2− = S2− and SO32−). Appl. Energy 2009, 86, 1080–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gray, S.; Mphahlele, M.; Collins, D.; Jackson, C.; Hardy, M.; Taylor, M. Comparison of Performance of NiCr2O4 and Cr2O3 Formed on the Ni-Based Superalloy RR1000 Under Corrosive Conditions. High Temp. Corros. Mater. 2024, 101, 1091–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kumar, S.; Mahobia, G. Cyclic oxidation of Fe–18Cr–21Mn–0.65 N austenitic stainless steel at 400–700 °C. Trans. Indian Inst. Met. 2020, 73, 2457–2470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lins, V.D.F.C.; Freitas, M.A.; e Silva, E.M.D.P. Oxidation kinetics of an Fe–31.8 Mn–6.09 Al–1.60 Si–0.40 C alloy at temperatures from 600 to 900 °C. Corros. Sci. 2004, 46, 1895–1907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Axe, L.; Trivedi, P. Feature Article Intraparticle Surface Diffusion of Metal Contaminants and their Attenuation in Microporous Amorphous Al, Fe, and Mn Oxides. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2002, 247, 259–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pérez, P.; Garcés, G.; Pérez, F.; Gómez, C.; Adeva, P. Influence of chromium additions on the oxidation resistance of an austenitic Fe–30Mn–5Al alloy. Oxid. Met. 2002, 57, 339–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Leong, A.; Yang, Q.; McAlpine, S.W.; Short, M.P.; Zhang, J. Oxidation behavior of Fe-Cr-2Si alloys in high temperature steam. Corros. Sci. 2021, 179, 109114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Moon, J.; Kim, S.; Park, W.D.; Kim, T.Y.; McAlpine, S.W.; Short, M.P.; Kim, J.H.; Bahn, C.B. Initial oxidation behavior of Fe-Cr-Si alloys in 1200 °C steam. J. Nucl. Mater. 2019, 513, 297–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lins, V.F.; Castro, M.M.; Domingues, R.Z.; Matencio, T. High temperature cyclic oxidation resistance of iron chromium base alloys. Chem. Eng. Technol. Ind. Chem. Plant Equip. Process Eng. Biotechnol. 2010, 33, 334–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Passos, J.G.d.C.; Silva, D.; Pereira, R.B.D.; Malafaia, A.M.d.S. Influence of test parameters on the cyclic oxidation behavior of AISI 310 and a new Fe-5.9 Si-3.9 Cr-4.5 Ni-0.8 C (wt.%) alloy. Matéria 2022, 27, e20220002. [Google Scholar]
  32. Pérez, F.; Cristóbal, M.; Hierro, M. High-temperature oxidation studies of low-nickel austenitic stainless steel. Part II: Cyclic oxidation. Oxid. Met. 2001, 55, 165–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kumar, K.; Angra, S.; Mittal, V.K. Comparison of failure analysis of Diesel Engine Exhaust Valve made of Inconel Alloy 751 & X45CrSi9-3 Stainless Steel. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Materials, Manufacturing and Applications (AMMA 2015), Hyderabad, 9–11 April 2015. [Google Scholar]
  34. Al-Hatab, K.A.; Al-Bukhaiti, M.; Krupp, U.; Kantehm, M. Cyclic oxidation behavior of IN 718 superalloy in air at high temperatures. Oxid. Met. 2011, 75, 209–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lobnig, R.; Schmidt, H.; Hennesen, K.; Grabke, H. Diffusion of cations in chromia layers grown on iron-base alloys. Oxid. Met. 1992, 37, 81–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Pinho, P.V.B. Experimental and Theoretical Study on Fe-Cr-O Thin Films: From Fine Structure to Macroscopic Behavior. Ph.D. Thesis, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  37. Li, J.; Cao, T.; Cheng, C.; Zhao, J. Effect of initial surface roughness on the cyclic oxidation behavior of an austenitic stainless steel. J. Mater. Sci. 2022, 57, 7310–7326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Van Orman, J.A.; Crispin, K.L. Diffusion in oxides. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 2010, 72, 757–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Singh, A.N.; Swain, S.K.; Meena, A.; Islam, M.; Nam, K.-W. Advances in Corrosion of High-Temperature Materials: Interfacial Migration and Alloy Design Strategies. Ceramics 2024, 7, 1928–1963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Young, D.J. High Temperature Oxidation and Corrosion of Metals; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2008; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
  41. Peraldi, R.; Pint, B. Effect of Cr and Ni contents on the oxidation behavior of ferritic and austenitic model alloys in air with water vapor. Oxid. Met. 2004, 61, 463–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Dryepondt, S.; Pint, B.A.; Lara-Curzio, E. Creep behavior of commercial FeCrAl foils: Beneficial and detrimental effects of oxidation. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2012, 550, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Gleeson, B.; Harper, M. The long-term, cyclic-oxidation behavior of selected chromia-forming alloys. Oxid. Met. 1998, 49, 373–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Song, E.-J. High Temperature Oxidation of Si-Containing Steel. Master’s Thesis, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang, Republic of Korea, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  45. Pei, J.; Li, Y.; Li, C.; Wang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Li, H. Microstructure-dependent oxidation behavior of Ni-Al single-crystal alloys. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2020, 52, 162–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wang, J. Effects of Water Vapour and Alloying Elements on High-Temperature Oxidation of Ferritic and Austenitic Chromia-forming Alloys. Master’s Thesis, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  47. Guo, Y.; Zhao, J.; Xu, B.; Gu, C.; Feng, K.; Wang, Y. Effect of high-temperature oxidation on the subsurface microstructure and magnetic property of medium manganese austenitic steel. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 913, 165254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ge, S.; Wang, Q.; Wang, J. The impact wear-resistance enhancement mechanism of medium manganese steel and its applications in mining machines. Wear 2017, 376, 1097–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, J.; Yan, K.; Huang, W.; Lu, Z. Mechanisms of Al2O3 and Cr2O3 formation during FeCrAl alloy oxidation: A first-principles study. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2024, 644, 158782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Cheng, L.; Sun, B.; Du, C.; Gao, W.; Cao, G. High-temperature oxidation behavior of Fe–10Cr steel under different atmospheres. Materials 2021, 14, 3453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Atas, M.S.; Yildirim, M. Effect of Nd addition on the microstructure and cyclic oxidation behavior of NiAl–Cr (Mo) eutectic alloys. Int. J. Met. 2024, 18, 1192–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Aryanto, D.; Sudiro, T.; Wismogroho, A.S. Structure and high temperature oxidation of mechanical alloyed Fe-Al coating. AIP Conf. Proc. 2016, 1725, 020008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Brnic, J.; Turkalj, G.; Krscanski, S.; Lanc, D.; Canadija, M.; Brcic, M. Information relevant for the design of structure: Ferritic–Heat resistant high chromium steel X10CrAlSi25. Mater. Des. 2014, 63, 508–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Liu, G.; Liang, B.; Ding, Z. Effect of oxidation temperature on surface oxide film structure and corrosion resistance of 50 steel. Heliyon 2024, 10, e40499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Coatings 15 01039 g001
Figure 1. The schematic representation of the experiments and analyses.
Figure 1. The schematic representation of the experiments and analyses.
Coatings 15 01039 g001
Coatings 15 01039 g002
Figure 2. Mass gain vs. time plot: (a) 1.4718 alloy oxidized at 550 °C, 650 °C, and 750 °C; (b) 1.4871 alloy oxidized at 550 °C, 650 °C, and 750 °C.
Figure 2. Mass gain vs. time plot: (a) 1.4718 alloy oxidized at 550 °C, 650 °C, and 750 °C; (b) 1.4871 alloy oxidized at 550 °C, 650 °C, and 750 °C.
Coatings 15 01039 g002
Coatings 15 01039 g003
Figure 3. SEM micrographs showing the oxide formation on 1.4718 steel surface: the left panel presents the general view at lower magnification, while the right panel corresponds to the enlarged image of the yellow-marked rectangular region in the left panel.
Figure 3. SEM micrographs showing the oxide formation on 1.4718 steel surface: the left panel presents the general view at lower magnification, while the right panel corresponds to the enlarged image of the yellow-marked rectangular region in the left panel.
Coatings 15 01039 g003
Coatings 15 01039 g004
Figure 4. SEM images of 1.4718 steel surface after oxidation cycles at (a) 550 °C, (b) 650 °C and (c) 750 °C, together with the corresponding elemental distribution obtained by EDS mapping. The color coding represents the respective elements as follows: red = Fe, blue = Cr, yellow = O, green = Mn, cyan = Si, and pink = Ni.
Figure 4. SEM images of 1.4718 steel surface after oxidation cycles at (a) 550 °C, (b) 650 °C and (c) 750 °C, together with the corresponding elemental distribution obtained by EDS mapping. The color coding represents the respective elements as follows: red = Fe, blue = Cr, yellow = O, green = Mn, cyan = Si, and pink = Ni.
Coatings 15 01039 g004
Coatings 15 01039 g005
Figure 5. Oxide formation on 1.4871 steel surface observed by SEM. The left image provides a broader view of the sample, whereas the right image illustrates a magnified section corresponding to the yellow rectangular area marked on the left.
Figure 5. Oxide formation on 1.4871 steel surface observed by SEM. The left image provides a broader view of the sample, whereas the right image illustrates a magnified section corresponding to the yellow rectangular area marked on the left.
Coatings 15 01039 g005
Coatings 15 01039 g006
Figure 6. SEM images of 1.4871 steel surface after oxidation cycles at (a) 550 °C, (b) 650 °C and (c) 750 °C, together with the corresponding elemental distribution obtained by EDS mapping. The color coding represents the respective elements as follows: red = Fe, yellow = O, green = Mn, purple = Ni, blue = Cr, cyan = C, and orange = Si.
Figure 6. SEM images of 1.4871 steel surface after oxidation cycles at (a) 550 °C, (b) 650 °C and (c) 750 °C, together with the corresponding elemental distribution obtained by EDS mapping. The color coding represents the respective elements as follows: red = Fe, yellow = O, green = Mn, purple = Ni, blue = Cr, cyan = C, and orange = Si.
Coatings 15 01039 g006
Coatings 15 01039 g007
Figure 7. Cross-sectional analysis of oxide layers formed on 1.4718 steel after oxidation cycles at (a) 550 °C, (b) 650 °C and (c) 750 °C. The yellow arrows indicate the lines selected for EDS line analysis. The graphs on the right present the elemental concentration profiles obtained along these lines.
Figure 7. Cross-sectional analysis of oxide layers formed on 1.4718 steel after oxidation cycles at (a) 550 °C, (b) 650 °C and (c) 750 °C. The yellow arrows indicate the lines selected for EDS line analysis. The graphs on the right present the elemental concentration profiles obtained along these lines.
Coatings 15 01039 g007
Coatings 15 01039 g008
Figure 8. Cross-sectional SEM morphology and corresponding EDS elemental mapping of the 1.4718 steel sample oxidized at 750 °C. The elemental distribution is represented by the following color coding: blue = Fe, red = Cr, yellow = O, green = Ni, and pink = Si.
Figure 8. Cross-sectional SEM morphology and corresponding EDS elemental mapping of the 1.4718 steel sample oxidized at 750 °C. The elemental distribution is represented by the following color coding: blue = Fe, red = Cr, yellow = O, green = Ni, and pink = Si.
Coatings 15 01039 g008
Coatings 15 01039 g009
Figure 9. Cross-sectional SEM analysis of oxide layers formed on 1.4871 steel after oxidation cycles at (a) 550 °C, (b) 650 °C, and (c) 750 °C. The yellow arrows denote the regions selected for EDS line analysis, and the graphs on the right present the corresponding elemental concentration profiles.
Figure 9. Cross-sectional SEM analysis of oxide layers formed on 1.4871 steel after oxidation cycles at (a) 550 °C, (b) 650 °C, and (c) 750 °C. The yellow arrows denote the regions selected for EDS line analysis, and the graphs on the right present the corresponding elemental concentration profiles.
Coatings 15 01039 g009
Coatings 15 01039 g010
Figure 10. Cross-sectional SEM morphology and corresponding EDS elemental mapping of the 1.4871 steel sample oxidized at 750 °C. The elemental distribution is illustrated by the following color coding: blue = Fe, red = Cr, yellow = O, green = Ni, and pink = Mn.
Figure 10. Cross-sectional SEM morphology and corresponding EDS elemental mapping of the 1.4871 steel sample oxidized at 750 °C. The elemental distribution is illustrated by the following color coding: blue = Fe, red = Cr, yellow = O, green = Ni, and pink = Mn.
Coatings 15 01039 g010
Coatings 15 01039 g011
Figure 11. EDS point analysis of surface and sublayer oxide scale in 1.4871 alloy oxidized at 750 °C.
Figure 11. EDS point analysis of surface and sublayer oxide scale in 1.4871 alloy oxidized at 750 °C.
Coatings 15 01039 g011
Coatings 15 01039 g012
Figure 12. XRD analysis of 1.4871 steel after three oxidation temperatures.
Figure 12. XRD analysis of 1.4871 steel after three oxidation temperatures.
Coatings 15 01039 g012
Table 1. Chemical composition of X53CrMnNiN21-9 and X45CrSi9-3 steels (wt. %).
Table 1. Chemical composition of X53CrMnNiN21-9 and X45CrSi9-3 steels (wt. %).
AlloysNameCSiMnCrNiNPS
X53CrMnNiN 21-91.48710.45–0.55Max 0.257–1020–223.30–4.400.30–0.45Max 0.04Max 0.03
X45CrSi9-31.47180.38–0.482.60–3.20Max 0.609–11Max 0.6–Max 0.04Max 0.03
Table 2. Summary of kinetic parameters derived from Wagner’s parabolic oxidation law (1/n and kp) for 1.4718 and 1.4871 steels under cyclic oxidation at different temperatures.
Table 2. Summary of kinetic parameters derived from Wagner’s parabolic oxidation law (1/n and kp) for 1.4718 and 1.4871 steels under cyclic oxidation at different temperatures.
Alloys
1.47181.4871
Temperature (°C)1/n k p (mg2cm−4sn−1)1/n k p (mg2cm−4sn−1)
5500.781.97 × 10−6 ± 2.34 × 10−70.533.16 × 10−6 ± 1.24 × 10−7
6500.762.86 × 10−6 ± 3.18 × 10−70.603.21 × 10−6 ± 2.21 × 10−7
7500.764.20 × 10−6 ± 3.44 × 10−70.503.45 × 10−6 ± 2.41 × 10−7
Table 3. EDS point analysis of the oxide scale in 1.4718 alloys oxidized at 550 °C, 650 °C and 750 °C (values reported as atomic percentages, normalized to 100%).
Table 3. EDS point analysis of the oxide scale in 1.4718 alloys oxidized at 550 °C, 650 °C and 750 °C (values reported as atomic percentages, normalized to 100%).
Elements * (at. %)Oxidation Temperature (°C)
550650750
Fe76.6835.1046.77
Cr7.2912.5212.20
Ni0.250.420.24
Si4.577.233.41
O11.2144.7437.38
* = Values represent normalized atomic percentages obtained from EDS analysis. Light elements below detection limits are not included. While multiple random points were analyzed to confirm oxide composition, the tabulated values correspond to the star marked regions shown in the SEM images (Figure 3).
Table 4. EDS point analysis of the oxide scale in 1.4871 alloys oxidized at 550 °C, 650 °C and 750 °C (values reported as atomic percentages, normalized to 100%).
Table 4. EDS point analysis of the oxide scale in 1.4871 alloys oxidized at 550 °C, 650 °C and 750 °C (values reported as atomic percentages, normalized to 100%).
Elements * (at. %)Oxidation Temperature (°C)
550-1550-2650-1650-2750-1750-2
Fe38.7351.4940.1135.2934.5638.56
Cr2.7016.676.3211.461.6815.74
Ni0.362.750.941.650.361.92
Mn8.916.445.839.18.125.32
O49.3022.6546.8042.555.1838.46
* = Values represent normalized atomic percentages obtained from EDS analysis. Light elements below detection limits are not included. For the 1.4871 alloy, two oxide morphologies were analyzed: the cauliflower-like surface oxides and the underlying sublayer. The corresponding point scan locations are indicated in the SEM images (Figure 5).
Table 5. Average oxide scale thicknesses with standard deviations determined from cross-sectional SEM images of 1.4718 and 1.4871 steels oxidized at 550 °C, 650 °C and 750 °C.
Table 5. Average oxide scale thicknesses with standard deviations determined from cross-sectional SEM images of 1.4718 and 1.4871 steels oxidized at 550 °C, 650 °C and 750 °C.
Alloys
1.47181.4871
Temperature (°C)Scale Thickness (µm)Temperature (°C)Scale Thickness (µm)
5501.88 ± 0.745501.38 ± 0.28
6505.42 ± 0.336501.84 ± 0.78
7507.18 ± 1.17503.15 ± 0.41
Table 6. Principal diffraction peaks (2θ positions, and relative intensities) of main oxide phases identified on the surface of the 1.4871 alloy after cyclic oxidation at different temperatures.
Table 6. Principal diffraction peaks (2θ positions, and relative intensities) of main oxide phases identified on the surface of the 1.4871 alloy after cyclic oxidation at different temperatures.
2θ Position of Fe2O3 (Degree)Intensity (%)2θ Position of Mn2O3 (Degree)Intensity (%)
33.16710032.961100
35.6407155.19640
54.0843823.14419
49.4763265.80718
24.1553138.24414
62.4542445.1787
64.0182349.3646
40.8721867.4814
57.6158
71.9708
84.9596
88.5855
75.4764
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Çetinkal, S.B.; Ataş, M.Ş.; Salur, E.; Şavklıyıldız, İ.; Sübütay, H.; Arıcı, G.; Kurdi, A.; Degnah, A.; AlHazaa, A. Cyclic Oxidation Behavior and Protective Oxide Scale Formation in Stainless-Steel Alloys for High-Temperature Exhaust Valve Applications. Coatings 2025, 15, 1039. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15091039

AMA Style

Çetinkal SB, Ataş MŞ, Salur E, Şavklıyıldız İ, Sübütay H, Arıcı G, Kurdi A, Degnah A, AlHazaa A. Cyclic Oxidation Behavior and Protective Oxide Scale Formation in Stainless-Steel Alloys for High-Temperature Exhaust Valve Applications. Coatings. 2025; 15(9):1039. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15091039

Chicago/Turabian Style

Çetinkal, Salih Bilal, Mehmet Şahin Ataş, Emin Salur, İlyas Şavklıyıldız, Halit Sübütay, Gökhan Arıcı, Abdulaziz Kurdi, Ahmed Degnah, and Abdulaziz AlHazaa. 2025. "Cyclic Oxidation Behavior and Protective Oxide Scale Formation in Stainless-Steel Alloys for High-Temperature Exhaust Valve Applications" Coatings 15, no. 9: 1039. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15091039

APA Style

Çetinkal, S. B., Ataş, M. Ş., Salur, E., Şavklıyıldız, İ., Sübütay, H., Arıcı, G., Kurdi, A., Degnah, A., & AlHazaa, A. (2025). Cyclic Oxidation Behavior and Protective Oxide Scale Formation in Stainless-Steel Alloys for High-Temperature Exhaust Valve Applications. Coatings, 15(9), 1039. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15091039

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop