Next Article in Journal
Degradation Mechanisms Occurring in PTFE-Based Coatings Employed in Food-Processing Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Corrosion Behavior of Chromium Coated Zy-4 Cladding under CANDU Primary Circuit Conditions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Statistical Analysis on the Structural Size of Simulated Thin Film Growth with Molecular Dynamics for Glancing Angle Incidence Deposition
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Obliquely Bideposited TiN Thin Film with Morphology-Dependent Optical Properties

Department of Electro-Optical Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 106, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2021, 11(11), 1418; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11111418
Submission received: 16 October 2021 / Revised: 14 November 2021 / Accepted: 17 November 2021 / Published: 20 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Glancing Angle Deposited and Anisotropic Thin Films and Coatings)

Abstract

:
TiN thin films were obliquely bideposited with different subdeposit thicknesses. The morphology of the bideposited film was varied from a nano-zigzag array to a vertically grown columnar structure by reducing the subdeposit thickness. The principal index of refraction and extinction coefficient were obtained to explain the measured reflectance and transmittance spectra. The loss of the bideposited thin film decreased as the thickness of the subdeposit decreased. The principal indices for normal incidence were near or under unity, indicating the low reflection by the bideposited thin films. A TiN film with a subdeposit thickness of 3 nm demonstrated an average index of refraction of 0.83 and extinction coefficient of below 0.2 for visible wavelengths. The retrieved principal refractive indexes explained the anisotropic transmission and reflection. For most normal incident cases, the analysis offers the tunable anisotropic property of a TiN nanostructured film for multilayer design in the future.

1. Introduction

Transition metal nitrides (TMNs), such as titanium nitride (TiN) and zirconium nitride (ZrN), are new plasmonic materials that are replacing noble metals in plasmonic applications [1,2,3]. As well as featuring carrier concentrations and mobilities as high as those of noble metals [4], TMNs feature high melting points and chemical stabilities at temperatures above 2000 °C [5,6]. Conventionally, TMNs with mechanical refraction have been used in hard coatings [7]. Recent works focused on the tunable optical properties of TMN films [8,9]. For example, the permittivity of a TiN film that is deposited in a sputtering system can be tuned to be metal-like or dielectric-like by controlling the deposition parameters, including the substrate bias voltage and the nitrogen and argon flow rates [10]. Usually, TiN film displays lossy dielectric properties in visible wavelength ranges and metal-like properties at infrared wavelength ranges. The wavelength-dependent optical property enables TiN to be applied in intermediate components that absorb solar irradiation [11]. Notably, nanostructured TiN films have favorable admittance matching properties. Due to plasmonic effects, TiN nano-square rings [12] are regularly distributed on SiO2 films that are coated on silicon to provide high absorptance for visible wavelengths. Like TiN nano-square ring arrays, glancing-angle deposited TiN nanorod arrays also exhibit broadband and wide-angle admittance matching [13].
Glancing-angle deposition (GLAD) is a unique form of physical vapor deposition that involves tilting the substrate so that its surface normal makes an angle α with respect to the incident vapors. The initial nucleation of condensed adatoms on a substrate induces self-shadowing, preventing the arrival of the vapor flux at the shadowed area. GLAD is a method for easily fabricating tilted nanorod arrays over large areas. A tilted nanorod array exhibits polarization-dependent reflection and transmission, which limit its range of uses at normal incidence. With one of its three principal axes parallel to nanorod growth [14,15,16], a tilted nanorod array exhibits complex optical properties at normal incidence, especially when its principal refractive indices are complex. Besides tilted nanorod arrays, various dielectric nanostructures can be mass-produced by manipulating the substrate during deposition [14,17]. Serial bideposition involves rotating the substrate stepwise by half a turn about its normal during GLAD to grow zigzag nanostructured arrays [18,19]. The half-pitch of a zigzag is the thickness of subdeposit, dsub. When the thickness of subdeposit is close to or less than the rod width, the individual zigzag structure shrinks to a column that is perpendicular to the substrate. The pitch-dependent birefringence of a bideposited TiO2 film [19] was investigated to show that the pitch length was inversely proportional to the birefringence. Figure 1 schematically depicts a nano-zigzag array and system coordinates whose z axis is normal to the surface and whose y-z plane is coincident with the deposition plane that contains the surface normal and the direction of initial deposition flux. When the dsub is near to or less than the rod width, the equivalent principal axes are coincident with the system coordinates. The principal z axis is normal to the surface; and the principal x axis is on the deposition plane that contains the z and x axes. For normal incidence, the birefringence nx–ny (the difference between principal indexes nx and ny) of a bideposited TiO2 film increases as the subdeposit thickness is reduced. The maximum birefringence of a bideposited TiO2 thin film with a pitch length of less than 5 nm was 0.15. In another work, a bideposited Ag film exhibited a negative real index of refraction nx and a positive real index of refraction ny, causing extremely large phase retardation with only a small thickness [20]. Since TiN exhibits dielectric optical properties at visible wavelengths less than the cross-zero wavelength (the wavelength at which the real part of permittivitty is zero) and metal optical property at wavelengths larger than the cross-zero wavelength, it is interesting to study the anisotropic optical property from a bideposited TiN film. On the other hand, a TiN nanorod array can be derived by nitrogenizing a GLAD TiO2 nanorod array [21], which inspired us to observe the anisotropic property of a bideposited TiN film and investigate the influence of deposition parameter on the anisotropy. Furthermore, a bideposited thin film presents two orthogonal principal indexes for normal incident waves, which could benefit multilayer design in the future.

2. Fabrication

In this study, GLAD was used to bideposit serially TiN nanozigzag arrays with different dsub. The birefringence and two principal indices corresponding to the normal incident wave that varied with subdeposit thickness were investigated. In the fabrication, TiN nanostructured films were deposited on glass substrates in a DC magnetron sputtering system in a prior background vacuum of 4 × 10 6 torr at room temperature. The deposition was conducted at a pressure of 4 × 10 3 torr with a varying flow rate of nitrogen. A Ti target with a diameter of 3 inches, a thickness of 4 mm, and a purity of 99.99% was attached to a Cu plate for sputtering. The deposition rate was controlled using a quartz crystal microbalance and maintained at 0.07 nm per second; the deposition angle θ v = 86 ° was the angle between the vertical line and the substrate normal. Sputtered atoms were aligned and the flux was controlled by setting a plate parallel to the substrate [22]. All the films were deposited with a substrate bias of 100 V and the flow rates of Ar and N 2 were fixed at 15 and 3.5 sccm, respectively. The deposition parameters were demonstrated to result in the growth of a metal-like TiN thin film [23]. To determine the actual growth deposition rate of bideposition, a slanted TiN nanorod array (NRA) with a thickness of 90.4 nm was fabricated by GLAD before bideposition. The thickness growth rate per minute was 0.25 nm/min which was obtained from the cross-sectional SEM image for the TiN NRA, as shown in Figure 2a. The thickness of the bideposited film was controlled accordingly. The optical property of a TiN NRA was reported in our previous paper [23]. The TiN NRA in this work was used to discover the growth rate of GLAD. Four TiN bideposited thin films with designed dsub of 50, 25, 12.5, 6 and 3 nm were fabricated on BK7 glass substrates (I-MEI MATERIALS, Taipei, Taiwan) [24], and denoted as TiN 50 3 , TiN 25 4 , TiN 12.5 8 , TiN 6 16 , and TiN 3 32 , respectively. The superscript in the notation specifies the number of bideposits in the fabrication. BK7 glass is an extremely common crown glass with an index of refraction of 1.52 and a wavelength of 550 nm [24]. All of the samples except for TiN 50 3 featured similar thicknesses, around 90.8 nm. Figure 2 presents top-view and cross-sectional SEM images of all the samples. The sample TiN 50 3 retains the clear zigzag morphology. The mean tilt angle of the rods, measured between the rod and normal to the surface is 24.7 ° , and the mean rod width is 27 nm. These values are close to those for a slanted TiN nanorod array. For TiN 25 4 , the zigzag morphology is vague and the average width of an individual saw-like column is 56 nm. As the subdeposit thickness was reduced to less than 12.5 nm, the zigzag structure became columnar. The insets displayed in Figure 2 were observed using Image J [25] to determine the width of the column. The porosity was inversely proportional to the dsub because the nanorods in the obvious zigzag structures overlapped with each other, as shown in Figure 2. As the dsub reduced, the overlap phenomenon disappeared to leave more space for air. The width of the column decreased from 56 to 47 nm as dsub decreased from 25 to 3 nm. Table 1 shows the width of the nanozigzag, thicknesses, and the deposition time for each sample.

3. Measurement and Discussion

The phase retardation between the x-polarized and y-polarized waves that were transmitted through the film was measured using an ellipsometer (J. A. Woollam Co., M2000, Lincoln, NE, USA). The spectra of phase retardation (PR) of all the samples decayed from a wavelength of 380 to 1680 nm, and were smooth and varied only slightly in the infrared regime, as shown in Figure 3a. Phase retardation can be achieved using a lossless anisotropic thin film with equivalent birefringence Δ n , Δ n = λ   ×   PR / ( 2 π d ) ; λ is the wavelength in free space, and d is the film thickness. At the shortest wavelength, the bideposited TiN films demonstrated larger equivalent birefringence values than TiN NRA, but its dsub exhibited no evident trend. However, the birefringence at infrared wavelengths was larger than in the visible regime and inversely proportional to dsub. Figure 3b plots the equivalent birefringence as a function of wavelength. At dsub < 12.5 nm, Δ n was close to 2.17 at λ = 1680 nm.
The reflectance (R) and transmittance (T) spectra of bideposited thin films were measured using a spectrometer (UH4150, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan), as shown in Figure 4. The extinctance (E) was calculated using the relation E = 1 R T . In the measurement, the incident plane was coincident with the deposition plane (x-z plane). All the films exhibited similar trends of transmittance and reflectance. The p-polarized transmittance exceeded the s-polarized transmittance and the p-polarized reflectance was less than the s-polarized reflectance. The bideposited TiN thin films exhibited a larger polarization-dependent transmittance (reflectance) than did the TiN NRA. The difference between the p-polarized and s-polarized transmittances of the bideposited thin film varied within the range of 10% to 15% and that between the p-polarized and s-polarized reflectances varied by less than 5% over the whole wavelength range. The transmittance increased and the reflectance decreased as dsub decreased. Because the average width of the nanozigzags was reduced by decreasing the dsub, the thinner nanozigzag led to better admittance matching and lower reflectance. The extinction was also improved because the porosity was higher for a sample with lower dsub. The fitting index of refraction and extinction coefficient spectra demonstrated the reasons that caused the trends in Figure 4. The average p-polarized reflectance of sample TiN 3 32 was below 12.1% and the average s-polarized reflectance was 16.4% over the whole wavelength range. Since the low reflection was associated with effective admittance matching, the equivalent principal refractive indexes N x = n x ik x and N y = n y ik y were retrieved by fitting both the reflectance and the transmittance spectra. Figure 5 presents the equivalent refractive index spectra of each bideposited sample for both polarizations.
The principal index of refraction nx was larger than ny and the extinction coefficient kx was less than ky for all the samples. In the sample TiN 50 3 , the index of refraction ny decreased from 1.23 at 400 nm to 0.717 at 2000 nm and the index of refraction nx decreased from 1.326 at 400 nm to 0.733 at 2000 nm. Both indices nx and ny decreased as dsub decreased. Therefore, the index of refraction ny of TiN 3 32 decreased from 0.807 at 500 nm to 0.568 at 1850 nm and the index of refraction nx decreased from 0.905 at 500 nm to 0.768 at 1850 nm. The extinction coefficient dipped at λ = 500 nm and increased from its minimum with λ up to 1700 nm. For the samples with dsub = 25, 12.5, 6 and 3 nm, the extinction coefficients increased smoothly over the infrared wavelengths. Both indices kx and ky also decreased as dsub decreased. The difference between kx and ky increased with the wavelength in Figure 5, which was in agreement with the fact that the difference between the s-polarized extinctance and p-polarized extinctance remained similar over the wavelength range in Figure 4. A typical deposited TiN film exhibited metal properties at infrared wavelengths and the magnitude of its negative real permittivity increased with wavelength [23]. Therefore the anisotropic structure caused anisotropic extinction, which increased with the wavelength. For the sample TiN 3 32 , the extinction coefficient ky increased from 0.191 at 500 nm to 0.717 at 1700 nm, and the extinction coefficient kx increased from 0.099 at 500 nm to 0.228 at 850 nm, remaining between 0.22 and 0.26 from 850 to 2000 nm. The extinction coefficients kx and ky decreased as dsub decreased.
Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 8 plot the measured s-polarized and p-polarized transmittance, reflectance and extinctance spectra versus the angle of incidence from 0 ° to 70 ° , respectively. The results for TiN NRA are similar to those in our previous work. The p-polarized extinctance that corresponded to longitudinal plasmonic resonance reached its maximum at the angle of incidence at which the electric field oscillated along the rods. The p-polarized transmittance was clearly asymmetrical to surface normal for TiN NRA and TiN 3 32 . As dsub decreased, the transmittance became symmetrical to surface normal due to the vertical growing columns. The p-polarized reflectance and the s-polarized reflectance were low over all the wavelengths and angles of incidence between θ = 50 °   and   θ = 50 ° , which clearly shows admittance matching over wide range of incident angle. For TiN 50 3 , the p-polarized transmittance demonstrated two peaks at θ = 60 ° and θ = 70 ° at wavelengths over 1600 nm. As dsub decreased, the area of high transmittance in Figure 6 extended over wide ranges of incident angles and wavelengths. For TiN 3 32 , the p-polarized transmittance exceeded 62.3% over wavelengths from 400 to 2000 nm and incident angles from −50 ° to 50 ° . The bideposited columnar TiN samples TiN 12.5 8 , TiN 6 16 , and TiN 3 32 demonstrated their maximum p-polarized extinctance at the largest angles of θ = 70 ° and θ = 70 ° because the electric field with the largest component oscillated along the columns at the largest angles of measurement. This also indicated that the principal refractive index Nz featured the largest imaginary part kz among the three principal refractive indices. The fact that maximum extinctance decays as dsub decreases indicated that the imaginary part of the principal refractive index kz also reduced as dsub decreased.

4. Conclusions

In summary, bideposited TiN films with different subdeposit thicknesses were fabricated to exhibit different optical properties. As well as the deposition parameters, such as reactive gas flow rate, substrate temperature, and deposition rate, the equivalent refractive index could be tuned by varying subdeposit thickness of a bideposited TiN film. The phase retardation values of all the bideposited films varied only slightly with wavelengths over 1000 nm, favoring achromatic application in polarization modulation. The bideposited films exhibited low reflection over a broad range of wavelengths and wide range of angles of incidence, indicating that they had favorable admittance matching to air. Most energy of incident light can be coupled into such bideposited thin films efficiently. The bideposited TiN film with a subdeposit thickness of around or less than 12.5 nm demonstrated a refractive index of approximate unity and a low but unavoidable extinction coefficient in the visible range. A multilayer can be designed and fabricated by alternating bideposited and high-index films to form an edge filter as a thermovoltaic device that performs high absorption in visible wavelength ranges and high reflection in infrared ranges.

Author Contributions

Y.-J.J. conceived the idea and supervised the whole work. W.-C.M. and T.-Y.L. deposited the films and performed measurements. Y.-J.J., W.-C.M. and T.-Y.L. analyzed the data. Y.-J.J. wrote the article. Y.-J.J. and T.-Y.L. revised the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology of the Republic of China, Taiwan, for financially supporting this research under contract MOST 108-2221-E-027-100-MY3.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Guler, U.; Shalaev, V.M.; Boltasseva, A. Nanoparticle plasmonics: Going practical with transition metal nitrides. Mater. Today 2015, 18, 227–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Korobenko, A.; Saha, S.; Godfrey, A.T.K.; Gertsvolf, M.; Naumov, A.Y.; Villeneuve, D.M.; Boltasseva, A.; Shalaev, V.M.; Corkum, P.B. High-harmonic generation in metallic titanium nitride. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 4981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zhou, J.; Chen, X.; Guo, L.J. Efficient thermal–light interconversions based on optical topological transition in the metal-dielectric multilayered metamaterials. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 3017–3023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Boltasseva, A.; Atwater, H.A. Low-loss plasmonic metamaterials. Science 2011, 331, 290–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Guler, U.; Boltasseva, A.; Shalaev, V.M. Refractory plasmonics. Science 2014, 344, 263–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pogrebnjak, A.; Smyrnova, K.; Bondar, O. Nanocomposite multilayer binary nitride coatings based on transition and refractory metals: Structure and properties. Coatings 2019, 9, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Pierson, H.O. Handbook of Refractory Carbides and Nitrides; William Andrew: Norwich, NY, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  8. Farrell, I.L.; Reeves, R.J.; Preston, A.R.H.; Ludbrook, B.M.; Downes, J.E.; Ruck, B.J.; Durbin, S.M. Tunable electrical and optical properties of hafnium nitride thin films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010, 96, 071914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Hu, C.; Gu, Z.; Wang, J.; Zhang, K.; Zhang, X.; Li, M.; Zhang, S.; Fan, X.; Zheng, W. Nature of tunable optical reflectivity of rocksalt hafnium nitride films. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 20511–20520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zgrabik, C.M.; Hu, E.L. Optimization of sputtered titanium nitride as a tunable metal for plasmonic applications. Opt. Mater. Express 2015, 5, 2786–2797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Qin, F.; Chen, X.; Yi, Z.; Yao, W.; Yang, H.; Tang, Y.; Yi, Y.; Li, H.; Yi, Y. Ultra-broadband and wide-angle perfect solar absorber based on TiN nanodisk and Ti thin film structure. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. C 2020, 211, 110535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, W.; Guler, U.; Kinsey, N.; Naik, G.V.; Boltasseva, A.; Guan, J.; Shalaev, V.M.; Kildishev, A.V. Refractory plasmonics with titanium nitride: Broadband metamaterial absorber. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 7959–7965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jen, Y.J.; Yang, K.B.; Lin, P.C.; Chung, M.H. Deposited ultra-thin titanium nitride nanorod array as a plasmonic near-perfect light absorber. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 22269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hodgkinson, I.J.; Wu, Q.H. Birefringent Thin Films and Polarizing Elements; World Scientific Publishing Company: Singapore, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  15. Bairagi, S.; Järrendahl, K.; Eriksson, F.; Hultman, L.; Birch, J.; Hsiao, C.L. Glancing angle deposition and growth mechanism of inclined AlN nanostructures using reactive magnetron sputtering. Coatings 2020, 10, 768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Martin, P.M. Handbook of Deposition Technologies for Films and Coatings; William Andrew: Norwich, NY, USA, 2010; pp. 621–670. [Google Scholar]
  17. Badshah, M.A.; Koh, N.Y.; Zia, A.W.; Abbas, N.; Zahra, Z.; Saleem, M.W. Recent developments in plasmonic nanostructures for metal enhanced fluorescence-based biosensing. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Park, Y.J.; Sobahan, K.M.A.; Hwangbo, C.K. Optical properties of TiO2 zigzag films prepared by using oblique angle deposition. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 2010, 56, 1378–1381. [Google Scholar]
  19. Hodgkinson, I.; Wu, Q.H. Serial bideposition of anisotropic thin films with enhanced linear birefringence. Appl. Opt. 1999, 38, 3621–3625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jen, Y.J.; Liu, W.C.; Cong, M.Y.; Chan, T.L. Bideposited silver nanocolloid arrays with strong plasmon-induced birefringence for SERS application. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 20143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Guler, U.; Zemlyanov, D.; Kim, J.; Wang, Z.; Chandrasekar, R.; Meng, X.; Stach, E.; Kildishev, A.V.; Shalaev, V.M.; Boltasseva, A. Plasmonic titanium nitride nanostructures via nitridation of nanopatterned titanium dioxide. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2017, 5, 1600717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dick, B.; Brett, M.J.; Smy, T.; Belov, M.; Freeman, M.R. Periodic submicrometer structures by sputtering. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 2001, 19, 1813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Jen, Y.J.; Chan, T.L.; Liao, B.H.; Li, Z.X.; Liu, W.C.; Cong, M.Y. Tunable plasmonic resonances in TiN nanorod arrays. Coatings 2019, 9, 863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Fischer, R.; Galeb, B.T.; Yoder, P. Optical System Design, 2nd ed.; McGraw-Hill Education: New York, NY, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  25. Yadav, J.; Raturi, P.; Yadav, S.; Singh, J.P. Zig-zag Ag2S nanostructures for superior optical absorption and photoelectrochemical water splitting performance. Renew. Energy 2021, 179, 2256–2266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic drawing of a nano-zigzag array.
Figure 1. Schematic drawing of a nano-zigzag array.
Coatings 11 01418 g001
Figure 2. Cross-section and top-view scanning electron microscopic (SEM) images of TiN NRA and bideposited thin films: (a) TiN NRA; (b) TiN 50 3 ; (c) TiN 25 4 ; (d) TiN 12.5 8 ; (e) TiN 6 16 ; (f) TiN 3 32 .
Figure 2. Cross-section and top-view scanning electron microscopic (SEM) images of TiN NRA and bideposited thin films: (a) TiN NRA; (b) TiN 50 3 ; (c) TiN 25 4 ; (d) TiN 12.5 8 ; (e) TiN 6 16 ; (f) TiN 3 32 .
Coatings 11 01418 g002
Figure 3. (a) Phase retardation and (b) equivalent birefringence of bideposited TiN films.
Figure 3. (a) Phase retardation and (b) equivalent birefringence of bideposited TiN films.
Coatings 11 01418 g003
Figure 4. P-polarized and s-polarized transmittance, reflectance, and extinctance spectra measured at normal incidence: (a) TiN 50 3 ; (b) TiN 25 4 ; (c) TiN 12.5 8 ; (d) TiN 6 16 ; (e) TiN 3 32 .
Figure 4. P-polarized and s-polarized transmittance, reflectance, and extinctance spectra measured at normal incidence: (a) TiN 50 3 ; (b) TiN 25 4 ; (c) TiN 12.5 8 ; (d) TiN 6 16 ; (e) TiN 3 32 .
Coatings 11 01418 g004
Figure 5. Principal indexes N x = n x ik x and N y = n y ik y of bideposited TiN thin films: (a) TiN 50 3 ; (b) TiN 25 4 ; (c) TiN 12.5 8 ; (d) TiN 6 16 ; (e) TiN 3 32 .
Figure 5. Principal indexes N x = n x ik x and N y = n y ik y of bideposited TiN thin films: (a) TiN 50 3 ; (b) TiN 25 4 ; (c) TiN 12.5 8 ; (d) TiN 6 16 ; (e) TiN 3 32 .
Coatings 11 01418 g005
Figure 6. Measured (af) p-polarized and (gl) s-polarized transmittance versus wavelength and angle of incidence of TiN NRA and bideposited TiN films.
Figure 6. Measured (af) p-polarized and (gl) s-polarized transmittance versus wavelength and angle of incidence of TiN NRA and bideposited TiN films.
Coatings 11 01418 g006
Figure 7. Measured (af) p-polarized and (gl) s-polarized reflectance versus wavelength and angle of incidence of TiN NRA and bideposited TiN films.
Figure 7. Measured (af) p-polarized and (gl) s-polarized reflectance versus wavelength and angle of incidence of TiN NRA and bideposited TiN films.
Coatings 11 01418 g007
Figure 8. Measured (af) p-polarized and (gl) s-polarized extinctance versus wavelength and angle of incidence of TiN NRA and bideposited TiN films.
Figure 8. Measured (af) p-polarized and (gl) s-polarized extinctance versus wavelength and angle of incidence of TiN NRA and bideposited TiN films.
Coatings 11 01418 g008
Table 1. The morphology parameters of TiN nano-zigzag deposited at different subdeposit thicknesses.
Table 1. The morphology parameters of TiN nano-zigzag deposited at different subdeposit thicknesses.
SamplesAverage Width of Nanozigzag (nm)Thicknesses (nm)Deposition Time (min)
TiN   NRA 6090.4396
TiN 50 3 66132.52608
TiN 25 4 5691.09408
TiN 12.5 8 5391.45408
TiN 6 16 4991.35408
TiN 3 32 4789.67408
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jen, Y.-J.; Ma, W.-C.; Lin, T.-Y. Obliquely Bideposited TiN Thin Film with Morphology-Dependent Optical Properties. Coatings 2021, 11, 1418. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11111418

AMA Style

Jen Y-J, Ma W-C, Lin T-Y. Obliquely Bideposited TiN Thin Film with Morphology-Dependent Optical Properties. Coatings. 2021; 11(11):1418. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11111418

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jen, Yi-Jun, Wei-Chieh Ma, and Ting-Yen Lin. 2021. "Obliquely Bideposited TiN Thin Film with Morphology-Dependent Optical Properties" Coatings 11, no. 11: 1418. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11111418

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop