Next Article in Journal
Infective Endocarditis by Lactobacillus Species—A Narrative Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Efficacy of Continuous vs. Intermittent Administration of Cefepime in Adult ICU Patients with Gram-Negative Bacilli Bacteremia: A Randomized Double-Blind Clinical Study
Previous Article in Journal
Improving Clostridioides difficile Infectious Disease Treatment Response via Adherence to Clinical Practice Guidelines
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Community Antibiotic Consumption in Cyprus for the Period 2015 to 2022

Antibiotics 2024, 13(1), 52; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13010052
by Eirini Mitsoura 1,2, Ioannis Kopsidas 1,3, Pambos Charalambous 4, Georgios Papazisis 2, Nikolaos Raikos 5 and Zoi Dorothea Pana 1,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Antibiotics 2024, 13(1), 52; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13010052
Submission received: 27 November 2023 / Revised: 24 December 2023 / Accepted: 29 December 2023 / Published: 4 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antibiotic Use in Outpatients and Hospitals)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

This is a good an important manuscript.

My only concern regards the fact that only about 50% of the phrmacies were included. I suggest (if data available) comparing the Pharmacies that were included to those who did not. In terms of location and other parameters. This comparison may support the assumption that the study represents all Cyprus.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Please see attached file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Comments on the Quality of English Language


Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The revised manuscript is now a much improved and better version. Authors have considered and addressed the comments very critically, sincerely,  diligently and sufficiently. Discussion and Conclusions section are nicely restructured and enriched with additional references. As I can observe, Grammar deficiencies have been rectified and references have also been restyled as per desired format.

In the light of the above, I am delighted to recommend the manuscript for acceptance and publication.

Back to TopTop