Next Article in Journal
Chronic Suppressive Antibiotic Treatment for Staphylococcal Bone and Joint Implant–Related Infections
Previous Article in Journal
Clinical Equivalence between Generic Versus Branded Antibiotics: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Clinical Outcome of Cefiderocol for Infections with Carbapenem-Resistant Organisms

Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2023, 12(5), 936; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12050936
Submission received: 11 April 2023 / Revised: 12 May 2023 / Accepted: 18 May 2023 / Published: 21 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Antibiotic Therapy in Infectious Diseases)

Abstract

Cefiderocol is a novel cephalosporin recently approved by the FDA to aid clinicians in the fight against multidrug-resistant (including carbapenem-resistant) gram-negative organisms. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the 14- and 28-day mortality associated with cefiderocol. We performed a retrospective chart review of all adult patients admitted at Stony Brook University Hospital between October 2020 and December 2021 and received cefiderocol for at least 3 days. Patients were excluded if they received more than one course of cefiderocol therapy or remained hospitalized at the time of this study. A total of 22 patients met the inclusion criteria. The all-cause mortality on day 28 for all patients was 13.6%, whereas this rate for patients with BSI was 0%, with cUTI was 0% and with LRTI was 16.7%. The all-cause mortality on day 28 for patients who received the dual antibiotics (in conjunction with cefiderocol) was 0%, compared to 25% for patients who only received cefiderocol (p = 0.25). We noted treatment failure in two patients (9.1%). Our findings suggest that cefiderocol could possibly be associated with lower all-cause mortality than previously thought. In our study, we did not find any significant difference between cefiderocol’s use in combination with another antibacterial agent and its use as a monotherapy.
Keywords: cefiderocol; gram-negative infection; multidrug-resistant infection cefiderocol; gram-negative infection; multidrug-resistant infection

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sajib, M.I.; Monteforte, M.; Go, R. Clinical Outcome of Cefiderocol for Infections with Carbapenem-Resistant Organisms. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 936. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12050936

AMA Style

Sajib MI, Monteforte M, Go R. Clinical Outcome of Cefiderocol for Infections with Carbapenem-Resistant Organisms. Antibiotics. 2023; 12(5):936. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12050936

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sajib, Monirul I., Melinda Monteforte, and Roderick Go. 2023. "Clinical Outcome of Cefiderocol for Infections with Carbapenem-Resistant Organisms" Antibiotics 12, no. 5: 936. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12050936

APA Style

Sajib, M. I., Monteforte, M., & Go, R. (2023). Clinical Outcome of Cefiderocol for Infections with Carbapenem-Resistant Organisms. Antibiotics, 12(5), 936. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12050936

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop