Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of Probe Positioning Effects on Optical Parameters in Neonatal Forehead Time-Resolved Spectroscopy Measurements
Previous Article in Journal
Combined Use of Microwave Sensing Technologies and Artificial Intelligence for Biomedical Monitoring and Imaging
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Kanyo et al. Kinetic Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 S1–Integrin Binding Using Live-Cell, Label-Free Optical Biosensing. Biosensors 2025, 15, 534

1
Nanobiosensorics Laboratory, Institute of Technical Physics and Materials Science, HUN-REN Centre for Energy Research, Konkoly-Thege Miklós út 29-33, H-1121 Budapest, Hungary
2
Chemical Engineering and Material Science Doctoral School, University of Pannonia, Egyetem u.10, H-8200 Veszprém, Hungary
3
Department of Biological Physics, Eötvös University, Pázmány Péter Sétny. 1/C, H-1117 Budapest, Hungary
4
Institute of Biophysics, HUN-REN Biological Research Centre, H-6726 Szeged, Hungary
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biosensors 2026, 16(2), 68; https://doi.org/10.3390/bios16020068
Submission received: 2 December 2025 / Accepted: 13 January 2026 / Published: 23 January 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Biosensor and Bioelectronic Devices)

Text Correction

Some corrections have been made to the original publication [1]. The revised version is as follows:
The kinetic dissociation constant ( K d S 1 3 D ) was previously reported as 4.616 ± 0.252 µM, but should read 12.76 ± 6.916 µM.
The statement “L0 = 5768 molecules·µm−2, corresponding to 0.267 µM S1 surface concentration” should read “L0 = 5768 molecules·µm−2, derived from a 0.267 µM coating solution.”
In the Supplementary Information, the sentence “The fitted curve captures the expected trend: as S1 surface activity increases, the apparent 3D K D S 1 decreases, indicating stronger integrin binding” should read “The fitted curve captures the expected trend: as S1 surface activity increases, the apparent 3D K D S 1 increases, indicating weaker integrin binding at higher apparent S1 activities.”

Error in Figure

The y axis units in Figure 3 and the Supplementary Information were incorrectly labeled in µM; they should be in molecules·µm−2. Corrected versions of Figure 3 and Figure S1 are presented below. We also changed text in the figure caption for clarity.
Figure 3. Adhesion kinetics and model fitting of integrin–S1 interaction in live cells. (A) Time course of bound integrin–ligand complex concentration upon seeding HeLa cells onto S1-coated surfaces (L0 = 5768 molecules·µm−2, derived from a 0.267 µM coating solution). Data represent n = 5 technical replicates. Gray dashed line: Bound complex surface concentration calculated from the experimental Δλ change using the calibration equation. Teal solid line: Fit of the kinetic model yielding rate constants k1, k2, and k3 and maximum complex density Imax. n = 5. (B) Simulated dynamics of complex (B, orange solid), free-integrin (red dashed), and free-ligand (blue solid) surface concentrations over 140 min using the fitted rate constants.
Figure 3. Adhesion kinetics and model fitting of integrin–S1 interaction in live cells. (A) Time course of bound integrin–ligand complex concentration upon seeding HeLa cells onto S1-coated surfaces (L0 = 5768 molecules·µm−2, derived from a 0.267 µM coating solution). Data represent n = 5 technical replicates. Gray dashed line: Bound complex surface concentration calculated from the experimental Δλ change using the calibration equation. Teal solid line: Fit of the kinetic model yielding rate constants k1, k2, and k3 and maximum complex density Imax. n = 5. (B) Simulated dynamics of complex (B, orange solid), free-integrin (red dashed), and free-ligand (blue solid) surface concentrations over 140 min using the fitted rate constants.
Biosensors 16 00068 g003
Figure S1. Time-dependent formation of integrin–ligand complexes upon HeLa cell adhesion to S1-coated surfaces: HeLa cells were seeded onto surfaces coated with 0.267 µM SARS-CoV-2 S1 protein, corresponding to a ligand surface density of 5768 molecules/µm2. Each panel (AE) represents an independent technical replicate (n = 5), showing the time course of integrin–ligand complex formation (in µm−2) derived from real-time biosensor signals. Gray dashed lines indicate experimental Δλ-based concentrations, while solid blue lines show fitted curves from the kinetic adhesion model. The close agreement between replicates confirms the reproducibility of the kinetic response under saturating S1 coating conditions.
Figure S1. Time-dependent formation of integrin–ligand complexes upon HeLa cell adhesion to S1-coated surfaces: HeLa cells were seeded onto surfaces coated with 0.267 µM SARS-CoV-2 S1 protein, corresponding to a ligand surface density of 5768 molecules/µm2. Each panel (AE) represents an independent technical replicate (n = 5), showing the time course of integrin–ligand complex formation (in µm−2) derived from real-time biosensor signals. Gray dashed lines indicate experimental Δλ-based concentrations, while solid blue lines show fitted curves from the kinetic adhesion model. The close agreement between replicates confirms the reproducibility of the kinetic response under saturating S1 coating conditions.
Biosensors 16 00068 g0s1
This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.

Reference

  1. Kanyo, N.; Borbely, K.; Peter, B.; Kovacs, K.D.; Balogh, A.; Magyaródi, B.; Kurunczi, S.; Szekacs, I.; Horvath, R. Kinetic Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 S1–Integrin Binding Using Live-Cell, Label-Free Optical Biosensing. Biosensors 2025, 15, 534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kanyo, N.; Borbely, K.; Peter, B.; Kovacs, K.D.; Balogh, A.; Magyaródi, B.; Kurunczi, S.; Szekacs, I.; Horvath, R. Correction: Kanyo et al. Kinetic Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 S1–Integrin Binding Using Live-Cell, Label-Free Optical Biosensing. Biosensors 2025, 15, 534. Biosensors 2026, 16, 68. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios16020068

AMA Style

Kanyo N, Borbely K, Peter B, Kovacs KD, Balogh A, Magyaródi B, Kurunczi S, Szekacs I, Horvath R. Correction: Kanyo et al. Kinetic Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 S1–Integrin Binding Using Live-Cell, Label-Free Optical Biosensing. Biosensors 2025, 15, 534. Biosensors. 2026; 16(2):68. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios16020068

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kanyo, Nicolett, Krisztina Borbely, Beatrix Peter, Kinga Dora Kovacs, Anna Balogh, Beatrix Magyaródi, Sandor Kurunczi, Inna Szekacs, and Robert Horvath. 2026. "Correction: Kanyo et al. Kinetic Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 S1–Integrin Binding Using Live-Cell, Label-Free Optical Biosensing. Biosensors 2025, 15, 534" Biosensors 16, no. 2: 68. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios16020068

APA Style

Kanyo, N., Borbely, K., Peter, B., Kovacs, K. D., Balogh, A., Magyaródi, B., Kurunczi, S., Szekacs, I., & Horvath, R. (2026). Correction: Kanyo et al. Kinetic Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 S1–Integrin Binding Using Live-Cell, Label-Free Optical Biosensing. Biosensors 2025, 15, 534. Biosensors, 16(2), 68. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios16020068

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop