Next Article in Journal
Influence of the Ripeness Stages of the Precursors on the Optical Characteristics of Carbon Dots Obtained from Valencia Orange Peels (Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck) by Hydrothermal Synthesis
Previous Article in Journal
Metal–N-Heterocyclic Carbene Porous Organic Polymers as Efficient Bifunctional Water-Splitting Electrocatalysts
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Insights into ALD Growth of Al-Based Dielectric Stack on 4H-SiC

1
Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche—Istituto per la Microelettronica e Microsistemi (CNR-IMM), Strada VIII 5, Zona Industriale, 95121 Catania, Italy
2
Centre for Energy Research, Institute of Technical Physics and Materials Science, Konkoly-Thege ut 29-33, 1121 Budapest, Hungary
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2026, 16(12), 782; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano16120782 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 29 May 2026 / Revised: 15 June 2026 / Accepted: 17 June 2026 / Published: 22 June 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Nanoelectronics, Nanosensors and Devices)

Abstract

An Al2O3/AlN stack deposited via Atomic Layer Deposition (ALD) methods as a gate insulator for silicon carbide (4H-SiC) has been investigated, focusing on the effects of different Al2O3 deposition processes on the nitride layer. In particular, dielectric stacks, consisting of a 10 nm AlN interface (001)-oriented layer directly grown on a 4H–SiC substrate and in 20 nm of additional amorphous Al2O3 layers were synthesized in sequential deposition runs by thermal ALD (T-ALD) or plasma-enhanced ALD (PEALD) methods. The evolution of the phenomena occurring at the Al2O3/AlN interfaces has been established by in situ ellipsometry measurements. Strong effects of the oxygen plasma because of the O-Al-N bond formation have been clearly observed and corroborated by ex situ structural and electrical characterizations, especially in the case of the plasma-enhanced Al2O3 process. In particular, the Al2O3/AlN bilayer grown by the Al2O3 T-ALD method exhibited good insulating behavior and an 8.7-high dielectric constant was measured. By contrast, the Al2O3/AlN bilayer grown by the Al2O3 PEALD method demonstrated poor insulating properties.

1. Introduction

In recent decades, insulating materials with high dielectric permittivity values (high-κ) have attracted an increasing interest both in the academic and industrial communities due to their promising properties for applications in a wide range of fields such as in metal oxide thin film transistors [1], in flexible electronics [2], in OLED displays [3], and in solar cells as passivation layers [4], as well as in energy storage systems [5].
Regarding microelectronics applications, the scaling of metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistors (MOSFETs), predicted by Moore’s law, has been, for many decades, the driving force for the integration of high-κ dielectrics in silicon technology [6,7]. However, modern power electronics applications are now moving towards wide band gap semiconductors, such as silicon carbide or gallium nitride, where the use of high-κ insulators is also desired to improve the transistors’ performances in terms of on-resistance, breakdown voltage and device transconductance [8].
In particular, silicon carbide (4H-SiC) is an ideal candidate for replacing silicon in high-voltage MOSFETs [9], but its high breakdown field is not fully exploitable due to the low dielectric constant value of the commonly used silicon oxide (SiO2) gate dielectric [10,11]. In this context, aluminum oxide (Al2O3) and aluminum nitride (AlN) can be interesting alternatives to SiO2 to decrease the device’s derating [10].
Al2O3 shows high dielectric constant values (~7–10) [8,12], a large critical electric field (~9–10 MV/cm) [13] and good thermal stability and amorphous structure [14]. However, the quality of the Al2O3/SiC interface is typically worse than the SiO2/SiC system. In fact, many studies demonstrated the need for a thin SiO2 interlayer between the Al2O3 insulator layer and SiC semiconductor to improve the gate dielectric performance [8,12]. On the other hand, AlN also showed a high dielectric constant (~9) [15] and good band offset [16]. In addition, since it possesses small in-plane lattice mismatch (~0.9%) and a nearly identical thermal expansion coefficient with respect to 4H-SiC, it could potentially guarantee high interface quality [17,18].
In our previous work, we reported on the growth of different highly (0001) oriented AlN thin layers on (0001)4H-SiC and their electrical behavior [19]. However, the presence of AlN grain boundaries could act as current pathways, favoring leakage current and consequent early device breakdown [20,21,22,23].
In this context, the Al2O3/AlN dielectric stack could result in improved interface quality because of the (0001)AlN preferential orientation on 4H-SiC and of the Al2O3 amorphous layer as a blocking layer for leakage current. Moreover, the Al2O3/AlN is a “fully high-k” stack, thus avoiding the SiO2 limitation in the perspective of high-voltage applications [24]. However, AlN exhibits a significant affinity towards oxygen, leading to the formation of a non-stoichiometric aluminum oxynitride (AlOxN1−x), both on its surface and throughout the bulk [25,26]. Interestingly, it has been shown that different oxygen content can have an influence on both the oxynitride’s structural and electrical properties [27,28,29]. For instance, Takeuchi et al. [30] demonstrated the importance of controlling the oxygen content in the AlOxN1−x dielectric layer by tuning the composition via different ALD processes and correlating it with different dielectric properties of the final MIS capacitors. Therefore, concerns should be directed to possible induced oxidation of AlN layer during Al2O3 deposition and its effect on the Al2O3/AlN stack’s dielectric properties.
To date, ex situ techniques were typically reported for chemical characterizations of AlN deposited layers, but alternative in situ characterizations would provide more accurate control and contaminant-free measurements.
This present paper is devoted to the chemical and electrical properties of Al2O3/AlN stack on 4H-SiC, focusing on the effect of ALD Al2O3 growth by different methods (i.e., thermal as well as plasma-enhanced processes) on the oxidation of the thin AlN interfacial layer deposited on silicon carbide. In particular, non-destructive in situ ellipsometry has been used “in operando” mode for the real-time characterization of both dielectric materials deposited via ALD [31]. Specifically, in situ ellipsometry was used to monitor thickness growth and variation of the refractive index during AlN and Al2O3 layer depositions. Then, the in situ investigation was correlated to the results obtained by complementary ex situ characterization techniques, namely scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) coupled with energy dispersion spectroscopy (EDS). Finally, the dielectric properties of the two Al2O3/AlN/4H-SiC capacitors were compared and correlated to the effects of different oxygen exposure during deposition process.

2. Materials and Methods

In this experiment, commercially available n-type 4° off-axis (0001)-oriented 4H-SiC epitaxial layers (doping concentration ND = 8 ×1015 cm−3, thickness t = 6.7 μm) grown onto a heavily doped 4H–SiC substrate were used. Before each ALD deposition, every 2 cm × 2 cm 4H-SiC coupon was cleaned with piranha solution (H2SO4:H2O2 = 1:3) for 10 min and diluted hydrofluoric acid (H2O:HF = 10:1) for 5 min to remove eventual carbon contaminations and residual native oxide. ALD processes for dielectric stack deposition were carried out on a PE-ALD LL SENTECH Instruments GmbH reactor equipped with a remote capacitively coupled plasma (CCP) source and excited by a 13.56 MHz RF generator via a matchbox with a power supply of 200 W.
Process parameters are summarized in Table 1. Firstly, a thin (~10 nm) AlN layer was deposited at 300 °C using trimethylaluminum (TMA) precursor as Al source and NH3 plasma as reacting gas for nitrogen. A 40 sccm N2 flow was used as carrier and as purging gas and each cycle was repeated 115 times. After the deposition of the AlN layer, the deposition temperature was decreased to 250 °C without vacuum breaking, so that the sequentially ~20 nm Al2O3 thin film was deposited on the AlN layer by the 250 cycle T-ALD or by 180 cycle PE-ALD processes.
Phenomena occurring at the Al2O3/AlN interface during the early stage of Al2O3 depositions were monitored by introducing in situ ellipsometric measurements at end of every ALD cycle. For this purpose, a Sentech SE 801 in situ spectroscopic ellipsometer operating (Berlin, Germany) in UV-VIS wavelength range (between 200 and 1040 nm) at 70° single angle of incidence was used to acquire psi (Ψ) and delta (Δ) spectra. SENTECH Spectraray4 software was used for data modelling and regression analysis, in which fit quality was monitored as deviation between measured and modelled spectra as mean squared error (MSE).
The dielectric behavior of the interface and stack was also evaluated by electrical measurements on metal insulator semiconductor (MIS) capacitors. The MIS capacitors, having an active area of 7.854 ×10−5 cm2, were fabricated using 80 nm thick sputtered Ni/Au electrodes, defined via optical photolithography and lift-off. Capacitance–voltage (C-V) and current–voltage (I-V) measurements were carried out at 1 kHz, because of low series resistance contribution, using a Microtech Cascade probe station equipped with a Keysight B1505 parameter analyzer.
Finally, both the Al2O3/AlN bilayers deposited on (0001) 4H-SiC were investigated as cross-sectioned samples by focused ion beam (FIB) (SCIOS2 SEM + FIB dual beam manufactured by ThermoFisher, Brno, Czech Republic) using scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) and energy dispersion spectroscopy (EDS) performed with an aberration-corrected Titan Themis 200 microscope (ThermoFisher, Eindhoven, The Netherlands).

3. Results and Discussion

Two different Al2O3/AlN dielectric stacks were deposited on (0001)4H-SiC epitaxial layers by sequential ALD processes of the Al compounds. In particular, the interfacial AlN (~10 nm) layers were always deposited via PE-ALD process, while the following Al2O3 (~20 nm) layers have been grown using either T-ALD (sample A) or PE-ALD (sample B).
The electrical behavior of both Al2O3/AlN/4H-SiC samples A and B has been investigated by fabrication of MIS capacitors (Figure 1a) using Ni/Au metal gate. Capacitance–voltage (C-V) curves (Figure 1b) have been acquired at 1 kHz to compare the electrical quality of the two stacked samples. Interestingly, while sample A showed a typical C-V curve shape reaching the accumulation capacitance in the positive gate bias range, measurements in sample B resulted in a very flat C-V curve, never reaching the accumulation condition. The complete and quantitative analysis of the dielectric properties of sample A indicated a dielectric constant value of 8.7, which represents a quite good and high value. Nevertheless, the C-V curve showed a significant positive shift of the flat band voltage (VFB = +7.55 V). This shift can be due to a negative fixed charge (Neff), which has been estimated to be Neff = 1.4 × 1013 cm−2, or, alternatively, it could be attributed to the presence of slow near-mid-gap acceptor states at the SiC interface as demonstrated in our previous study on p- and n-type MOS capacitors [24].
On the other hand, Figure 1c shows current/voltage measurements (I/V) performed using the same MIS structures fabricated on samples A and B. The two I/V curves seem to be almost overlapped in the initial 0–7.5 V range, but, at voltages higher than 7.5 V, a different conductivity is quite evident. The thicknesses of samples A and B are adequate in order to camper the current magnitudes [32] and it is possible to affirm that sample B shows both higher current values an earlier breakdown with respect to sample A. This further investigation can be considered the explanation for the missed accumulation in the C/V characterization curve of sample B.
However, since the reason for the electrical behavior of sample B is not clear, the origin of the degradation of its MIS electrical performances deserves to be investigated. In this context, attention has been paid to the phenomena occurring at the Al2O3/AlN interfaces during the deposition processes. In fact, it is possible that oxygen ions might diffuse within the AlN layer by O2− occupation of N-vacancies [33] and O-Al-N bonds are likely formed; thus, insights on the phenomena occurring at the Al2O3/AlN interface during the deposition processes have been collected for both samples A and B. The possible formation of an AlOxN1−x layer has been investigated by in situ SE at the end of every ALD cycle (Figure 2) on small-size silicon substrates, which were inserted in the deposition chamber alongside the 4H-SiC substrate. Real-time measurements were performed during the whole deposition process of the AlN and Al2O3 layers as well as on the last 80 cycles of the AlN deposition and on the sequentially initial 80 cycles of the Al2O3 layers.
Different dispersion models (Figure 3a) are widely used for each deposited layer, namely the Cauchy layer model for the transparent Al2O3 [34,35] and the Tauc-Lorentz dispersion for the AlN, which has a slight adsorption in the short wavelength range [36,37]. The possible formation of an AlOxN1−x layer has been modelled via an effective medium approximation optical model (EMA), which calculates the final optical properties as a combination of different materials averaging the refractive indexes (nEMA) of the two Al2O3 and AlN materials using Equation (1), where (f) represents the volume fractions of inclusions [38].
n E M A 2 = i = 1 N f i · n i 2 i = 1 N f i
In particular, during nitride deposition, fitting parameters were EMA layer thickness and volume fractions of inclusions, whereas, during oxide deposition, the Al2O3 thickness and EMA volume fractions of inclusions were fitted. Firstly, film thickness values upon increasing the number of ALD cycles have been evaluated and reported in Figure 3b. A constant growth-per-cycle (GPC) trend, which is the typical feature of the ALD regime growth, has been observed for all the processes and the extracted values, obtained as slopes of the thickness-cycle straight lines, which are: GPC = 1.1 Å/cycle for AlN by PE-ALD process, while GPC = 1.2 Å/cycle and GPC = 0.8 Å/cycle values have been calculated for Al2O3 by PE-ALD and T-ALD, respectively. These values are in good agreement with previous data reported in the literature [39].
Hence, the calculated AlOxN1−x refractive index values as a function of ALD number of cycles is reported in Figure 3c and, for all the fitted data, mean squared error (MSE) remained below 0.95, indicating good reliability. During nitride deposition (blue background), refractive index values equally stay constant in both samples for about 50 cycles, and then it decreases as Al2O3 deposition starts. In particular, for sample B (red squares), the nitride deposition end corresponds to a drastic reduction in refractive index value that further decreases during oxide deposition. On the other hand, during the initial cycles of Al2O3 thermal deposition for sample A, the refractive index (green triangles) smoothly decreases as well but reaches a plateau at higher values. This difference could be explained by considering pure Al2O3 and AlN refractive index values.
Indeed, aluminum nitride has a refractive index at 633 nm of 1.9–2.1 in its polycrystalline phase, which is consistently higher than that of amorphous Al2O3 (1.6–1.7 for as-deposited ~20 nm layer). All in situ data described above pointed to a clear interaction at the Al2O3/AlN interface, especially in the case of the deposition process for sample B.
Hence, structural film properties and the quality of their interfaces have been imaged by scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM). Low magnification images of samples A (Figure 4a) and B (Figure 4b) showed uniform coating; the crystalline nature of AlN is clearly visible, whereas Al2O3 layers appear amorphous in both samples. The AlN layers are about 10 nm thick, while the Al2O3 layers are 18–19 nm thick for samples A and B in both the oriented (001) AlN planes, showing a perfect alignment with respect to those of the (0001)4H-SiC substrate as previously demonstrated [19]. On the other hand, some differences are evident at the Al2O3/AlN interface, which is quite sharp in sample A and almost porous in sample B.
This difference was investigated by EDS measurements performed on cross-sectional samples. Chemical maps are reported in Figure 5a and Figure 5b for samples A and B, respectively. The principal difference between samples A and B consists in the nitrogen and oxygen distribution at the Al2O3/AlN interfaces. As a matter of fact, the nitrogen map of sample B appears to be slightly thinner (~7–8 nm) than in sample A (9–10 nm), while the oxygen map clearly demonstrates the occurrence of an oxygen diffusion from the Al2O3/AlN layer into the underlying AlN layer in the case of the PE-ALD process. Oxygen radicals were easily diffused and an oxidation process probably occurred at the Al2O3/AlN interface in sample B.
The distribution of the chemical elements inside the two Al2O3/AlN stacks has also been observed by the spatially resolved STEM-EDS signals elaborated as chemical depth profiles. The trends of carbon, aluminum, nitrogen and oxygen atomic fraction percentages from film surface (0 nm) to the underlying SiC (35 nm) have been monitored and are reported in Figure 5c,d. The presence of carbon at the film surface is due to the organic glue used during the fabrication of sample cross-sections. The overlapping of Al and O signals and their ratio clearly confirm the presence of the Al2O3 layers. However, different oxide layer thicknesses produced by the T-ALD and PE-ALD processes have been again observed and, more interestingly, while the oxygen signal decreases and the nitrogen rises at the interface with the AlN, an overlap of the N and O signals occurs. This is highlighted as yellow areas in Figure 5c and Figure 5d related to samples A and B, respectively. The composition within the yellow areas indicated the formation of a non-stoichiometric oxynitride layer such as AlOxN1−x and the thickness of this “transition layer” is very different between the A and B samples. Therefore, these profiles demonstrated that the oxygen contamination occurred at a much deeper thickness in sample B with respect to sample A.
Furthermore, in Figure 6, STEM image and the relative aluminum map by STEM-EDS analysis have also been acquired at the Al2O3/AlN interface for sample B. In particular, it is characterized by visible irregularities already observed at a lower magnification in Figure 4b, but, here, they are clearly observable from the lack of the Al signal in Figure 6b representing the Al elemental map acquired at 490 keV.
In this context, Yeh and Tuan [40] demonstrated the formation of micropores by the surface oxidation of AlN by oxygen, producing gaseous nitrogen and Al2O3/AlN with a reaction that is more thermodynamically favored than water-induced AlN oxidation. The presence of oxygen in the plasma phase during deposition probably followed a similar reaction pathway, energetically favoring the reaction even more.
The persistence of the diffraction fringes indicates that the crystalline phase of the AlN film is preserved after Al2O3 deposition, indicating that the AlN layer retains its initial crystallinity throughout the process. The images suggest that the interaction with the oxygen plasma likely induces a modification of the interfacial density, which is consistent with the pronounced change in refractive index measured by in situ ellipsometry. This interpretation is further supported by the microstructural observations, which reveal an apparent reduction in the initial AlN thickness while maintaining its crystalline nature, together with the formation of an interfacial region where the aluminum distribution appears less homogeneous. In this context, we can affirm that the fringes are not related to the Al2O3 layer, but to the AlN; in fact, they are present within the initial AlN film thickness.
It is clear that both STEM and the related chemical analysis provides a comprehensive investigation into the structural and chemical properties of the deposited materials; but, they represent ex situ and destructive characterization methods, while the oxygen contamination in the aluminum nitride layer has been also detected by the in situ ellipsometry measurements.
Finally, all these collected data by both chemical and electrical characterization demonstrated that the total high-k Al2O3/AlN stack is an interesting and promising system with respect to the parental Al2O3 layer.

4. Conclusions

In summary, Al2O3/AlN stacks deposited by ALD on 4H-SiC have been investigated, focusing on the effects of different Al2O3 deposition processes on the AlN layer. In particular, in situ spectroscopic ellipsometry was demonstrated as a valuable non-destructive technique for the real-time monitoring of the oxygen contamination in AlN thin films during the T-ALD and PE-ALD deposition of an overlying Al2O3 thin layer. By modelling the AlN optical properties as an oxynitride material (AlOxN1−x), the oxygen content was progressively correlated with the measured real-time varying oxynitride refractive index values. These findings were consistent with complementary ex situ STEM-EDS analysis carried out on samples processed from the same ALD conditions on 4H-SiC, validating the reliability of in situ ellipsometry. The significance of the proposed approach was further corroborated by the electrical characterization of MIS capacitors made from the deposited dielectric stack samples. Indeed, C-V and I-V measurements showed that strong oxidation at the AlOxN1−x surface can cause critical degradation of the dielectric properties. While a quantitative correlation remains to be established in future studies, these results pave the way for the use of in situ ellipsometry in setting the processing conditions for high-k dielectrics in power electronics device processing.

Author Contributions

Data curation, investigation, methodology, writing—original draft B.G.; conceptualization and supervision E.S.; investigation and validation P.F.; funding acquisition and review F.G.; funding acquisition and review B.P.; investigation and validation Z.F.; writing—review and editing F.R.; conceptualization, validation and supervision R.L.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by bilateral project GHOST III and NKFIH ADVANCED NKKP 152987 project supported by the Hungarian Academy of Sciences and CNR Italy.

Data Availability Statement

The data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. Bela Pecz thanks the support for the NKFIH ADVANCED NKKP 152987 project.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Kittl, J.A.; Opsomer, K.; Popovici, M.; Menou, N.; Kaczer, B.; Wang, X.P.; Adelmann, C.; Pawlak, M.A.; Tomida, K.; Rothschild, A.; et al. High-κ dielectrics for future generation memory devices. Microelectron. Eng. 2009, 86, 1789–1795. [Google Scholar]
  2. Wang, B.; Huang, W.; Chi, L.; Al-Hashimi, M.; Marks, T.J.; Facchetti, A. High-κ gate dielectrics for emerging flexible and stretchable electronics. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 5690–5754. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Jeong, J.K. The status and perspectives of metal oxide thin-film transistors for active matrix flexible displays. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 2011, 26, 034008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kim, J.; Lee, S.; Chowdhury, S.; Yi, J. A brief review of passivation materials and process for high efficiency PERC solar cell. Trans. Electr. Electron. Mater. 2022, 23, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  5. Wang, G.; Huang, X.; Jiang, P. Tailoring Dielectric Properties and Energy Density of Ferroelectric Polymer Nanocomposites by High-κ Nanowires. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 18017–18027. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  6. Ritala, M.; Niinistö, J. Industrial applications of atomic layer deposition. ECS Trans. 2009, 25, 641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wilk, G.D.; Wallace, R.M.; Anthony, J.M. High-κ gate dielectrics: Current status and materials properties considerations. J. Appl. Phys. 2001, 89, 5243–5275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lo Nigro, R.; Fiorenza, P.; Greco, G.; Schilirò, E.; Roccaforte, F. Structural and insulating behaviour of high-permittivity binary oxide thin films for silicon carbide and gallium nitride electronic devices. Materials 2022, 15, 830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Roccaforte, F.; Fiorenza, P.; Greco, G.; Lo Nigro, R.; Giannazzo, F.; Iucolano, F.; Saggio, M. Emerging trends in wide band gap semiconductors (SiC and GaN) technology for power devices. Microelectron. Eng. 2018, 187–188, 66–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Baliga, B.J. Silicon Carbide Power Devices; World Scientific: Singapore, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  11. Roccaforte, F.; Giannazzo, F.; Iucolano, F.; Eriksson, J.; Weng, M.H.; Raineri, V. Surface and interface issues in wide band gap semiconductor electronics. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2010, 256, 5727–5735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Siddiqui, A.; Khosa, R.Y.; Usman, M.J. High-k dielectrics for 4H-silicon carbide: Present status and future perspectives. Mater. Chem. C 2021, 9, 5055–5081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Schilirò, E.; Lo Nigro, R.; Fiorenza, P.; Roccaforte, F. Negative charge trapping effects in Al2O3 films grown by atomic layer deposition onto thermally oxidized 4H-SiC. AIP Adv. 2016, 6, 075021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Jakschik, S.; Schroeder, U.; Hecht, T.; Gutsche, M.; Seidl, H.; Bartha, J.W. Crystallization behavior of thin ALD-Al2O3 films. Thin Solid Films 2003, 425, 216–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Collins, A.T.; Lightowlers, E.C.; Dean, P.J. Lattice vibration spectra of aluminum nitride. Phys. Rev. 1967, 158, 833–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Choi, J.; Puthenkovilakam, R.; Chang, J.P. Band structure and alignment of the AlN∕SiC heterostructure. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005, 86, 192101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Levinshtein, M.E.; Rumyantsev, S.L.; Shur, M.S. Properties of Advanced Semiconductor Materials; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  18. Morkoç, H. Encyclopedia of Materials: Science and Technology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2001; pp. 121–126. [Google Scholar]
  19. Galizia, B.; Fiorenza, P.; Bongiorno, C.; Pécz, B.; Fogarassy, Z.; Schilirò, E.; Giannazzo, F.; Roccaforte, F.; Lo Nigro, R. Structural and electrical correlation in aluminum nitride thin films grown by plasma enhanced atomic layer deposition as interface insulating layers on silicon carbide (4H-SiC). Microelectron. Eng. 2024, 283, 112103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Onojima, N.; Suda, J.; Matsunami, H. High-quality AlN by initial layer-by-layer growth on surface-controlled 4H–SiC (0001) substrate. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2003, 42, L445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Khosa, R.Y.; Chen, J.T.; Pálsson, K.; Karhu, R.; Hassan, J.; Rorsman, N.; Sveinbjörnsson, E.Ö. Electrical properties of 4H-SiC MIS capacitors with AlN gate dielectric grown by MOCVD. Solid-State Electron. 2019, 153, 52–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Komatsu, N.; Satoh, T.; Honjo, M.; Futatuki, T.; Masumoto, K.; Kimura, C.; Aoki, H. Influence of inserting AlN between AlSiON and 4H–SiC interface for the MIS structure. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2011, 257, 8307–8310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Usman, M.; Hallén, A.; Pilvi, T.; Schöner, A.; Leskelä, M.J. Toward the Understanding of Stacked Al-Based High-k Dielectrics for Passivation of 4H-SiC Devices. Electrochem. Soc. 2010, 158, H75. [Google Scholar]
  24. Galizia, B.; Fiorenza, P.; Schilirò, E.; Pécz, B.; Fogarassy, Z.; Greco, G.; Saggio, M.; Cascino, S.; Lo Nigro, R.; Roccaforte, F. Towards aluminum oxide/aluminum nitride insulating stacks on 4H–SiC by atomic layer deposition. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2024, 174, 108244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Motamedi, P.; Cadien, K. XPS analysis of AlN thin films deposited by plasma enhanced atomic layer deposition. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 315, 104–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Rosenberger, L.; Baird, R.; McCullen, E.; Auner, G.; Shreve, G. XPS analysis of aluminum nitride films deposited by plasma source molecular beam epitaxy. Surf. Interface Anal. 2008, 40, 1254–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tabary, P.; Servant, C.J. Crystalline and microstructure study of the AlN–Al2O3 section in the Al–N–O system. I. Polytypes and γ-AlON spinel phase. Appl. Crystallogr. 1999, 32, 241–252. [Google Scholar]
  28. Kazan, M.; Rufflé, B.; Zgheib, C.; Masri, P.J. Oxygen behavior in aluminum nitride. Appl. Phys. 2005, 98, 103529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Brien, V.; Pigeat, P.J. Correlation between the oxygen content and the morphology of AlN films grown by rf magnetron sputtering. Cryst. Growth 2008, 310, 3890–3895. [Google Scholar]
  30. Takeuchi, W.; Yamamoto, K.; Sakashita, M.; Nakatsuka, O.; Zaima, S. Effect of N bonding structure in AlON deposited by plasma-assisted atomic layer deposition on electrical properties of 4H-SiC MOS capacitor. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2018, 57, 01AE06. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Morales, C.; Mahmoodinezhad, A.; Tschammer, R.; Kosto, J.; Alvarado Chavarin, C.; Schubert, M.A.; Wenger, C.; Henkel, K.; Flege, J.I. Combination of Multiple Operando and In-Situ Characterization Techniques in a Single Cluster System for Atomic Layer Deposition: Unraveling the Early Stages of Growth of Ultrathin Al2O3 Films on Metallic Ti Substrates. Inorganics 2023, 11, 477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gong, J.; Adnani, M.; Jones, B.T.; Xin, Y.; Wang, S.; Patel, S.V.; Lochner, E.; Mattoussi, H.; Hu, Y.-Y.; Gao, H. Nanoscale encapsulation of hybrid perovskites using hybrid atomic layer deposition. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2022, 18, 4082–4089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Fang, Z.; Wang, E.; Chen, Y.; Hou, X.; Chou, K.-C.; Yang, W.; Chen, J.; Shan, M. Wurtzite AlN (0001) surface oxidation: Hints from ab initio calculations. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 30811–30818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Hilfiker, J.; Tompkins, H. Spectroscopic Ellipsometry: Practical Application to Thin Film Characterization; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  35. Wang, Z.-Y.; Zhang, R.-J.; Lu, H.-L.; Chen, X.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wei, Y.-F.; Xu, J.-P.; Wang, S.-Y.; Zheng, Y.-X.; et al. The impact of thickness and thermal annealing on refractive index for aluminum oxide thin films deposited by atomic layer deposition. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2015, 10, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Adachi, S. Optical Constants of Crystalline and Amorphous Semiconductors; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  37. Bakalova, S.; Szekeres, A.; Grigorescu, S.; Axente, E.; Socol, G.; Mihailescu, I.N. Optical properties of aluminium nitride films obtained by pulsed laser deposition: An ellipsometric study. Appl. Phys. A 2006, 85, 99–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Uwe, R.; Georg, D.; Helge, K. SPECTRARAY Software Manual; SENTECH Instruments GmbH: Berlin, Germany, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  39. Galizia, B.; Schiliro, E.; Fiorenza, P.; Peters, S.; Zessin, J.; Roccaforte, F.; Lo Nigro, R.J. Nucleation studies of high-κ aluminum oxide and hafnium oxide thin films on silicon carbide by plasma-enhanced atomic layer deposition. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 2025, 43, 022410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yeh, C.-T.; Tuan, W.-H. Oxidation mechanism of aluminum nitride revisited. J. Adv. Ceram. 2017, 6, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematical images of fabricated MIS (a). C–V curves (b) and I-V measurements (c) acquired for sample A (green triangles) and sample B (red squares).
Figure 1. Schematical images of fabricated MIS (a). C–V curves (b) and I-V measurements (c) acquired for sample A (green triangles) and sample B (red squares).
Nanomaterials 16 00782 g001
Figure 2. ALD cycle deposition parameters and in situ cyclic SE measurements for (a) plasma-enhanced ALD of AlN and thermal-ALD Al2O3 (sample A) as well as for (b) plasma-enhanced ALD of both AlN and Al2O3 (sample B).
Figure 2. ALD cycle deposition parameters and in situ cyclic SE measurements for (a) plasma-enhanced ALD of AlN and thermal-ALD Al2O3 (sample A) as well as for (b) plasma-enhanced ALD of both AlN and Al2O3 (sample B).
Nanomaterials 16 00782 g002
Figure 3. (a) Schematic illustrations of the optical models used for SE data fitting and (b) film thickness values vs. the number of ALD cycles for sample A (green triangles) and sample B (red squares). (c) Evolution of the refractive index at 633 nm with the number of ALD cycles for samples A and B. The shaded blue rectangular area represents the AlN PE-ALD process, whereas Al2O3 depositions are reported with white background.
Figure 3. (a) Schematic illustrations of the optical models used for SE data fitting and (b) film thickness values vs. the number of ALD cycles for sample A (green triangles) and sample B (red squares). (c) Evolution of the refractive index at 633 nm with the number of ALD cycles for samples A and B. The shaded blue rectangular area represents the AlN PE-ALD process, whereas Al2O3 depositions are reported with white background.
Nanomaterials 16 00782 g003
Figure 4. STEM images of the two different dielectric stacks deposited on 4H-SiC: (a) sample A and (b) sample B.
Figure 4. STEM images of the two different dielectric stacks deposited on 4H-SiC: (a) sample A and (b) sample B.
Nanomaterials 16 00782 g004
Figure 5. STEM-EDS maps showing the elemental distribution of N, O, and Si across the layers are provided in (a) for sample A and (b) for sample B and the relative depth profiles of elemental distribution of Al, C, N, and O, obtained in (c) sample A (T-ALD Al2O3) and (d) sample B (PE-ALD Al2O3). The shaded yellow regions represent the overlapping of the O and N signals, indicating the presence of non-stoichiometric AlOxN1−x layers at the interfaces.
Figure 5. STEM-EDS maps showing the elemental distribution of N, O, and Si across the layers are provided in (a) for sample A and (b) for sample B and the relative depth profiles of elemental distribution of Al, C, N, and O, obtained in (c) sample A (T-ALD Al2O3) and (d) sample B (PE-ALD Al2O3). The shaded yellow regions represent the overlapping of the O and N signals, indicating the presence of non-stoichiometric AlOxN1−x layers at the interfaces.
Nanomaterials 16 00782 g005
Figure 6. STEM image (a) of sample B and (b) the relative EDS aluminum map.
Figure 6. STEM image (a) of sample B and (b) the relative EDS aluminum map.
Nanomaterials 16 00782 g006
Table 1. Deposition parameters for the depositions of the AlN and Al2O3 layers.
Table 1. Deposition parameters for the depositions of the AlN and Al2O3 layers.
StackLayerALD MethodTMA Pulsing Time (s)/Purging Time (s)NH3 Plasma or H2O, or O2 Plasma Pulsing Time (s)/Purging Time (s)Number
of Cycles
Sample AAlNPE ALD0.03/215/1115
Al2O3Thermal-ALD0.02/20.02/2250
Sample BAlNPE ALD0.03/215/1115
Al2O3PE-ALD0.06/21/1180
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Galizia, B.; Schilirò, E.; Fiorenza, P.; Giannazzo, F.; Pecz, B.; Fogarassy, Z.; Roccaforte, F.; Lo Nigro, R. Insights into ALD Growth of Al-Based Dielectric Stack on 4H-SiC. Nanomaterials 2026, 16, 782. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano16120782

AMA Style

Galizia B, Schilirò E, Fiorenza P, Giannazzo F, Pecz B, Fogarassy Z, Roccaforte F, Lo Nigro R. Insights into ALD Growth of Al-Based Dielectric Stack on 4H-SiC. Nanomaterials. 2026; 16(12):782. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano16120782

Chicago/Turabian Style

Galizia, Bruno, Emanuela Schilirò, Patrick Fiorenza, Filippo Giannazzo, Bela Pecz, Zsolt Fogarassy, Fabrizio Roccaforte, and Raffaella Lo Nigro. 2026. "Insights into ALD Growth of Al-Based Dielectric Stack on 4H-SiC" Nanomaterials 16, no. 12: 782. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano16120782

APA Style

Galizia, B., Schilirò, E., Fiorenza, P., Giannazzo, F., Pecz, B., Fogarassy, Z., Roccaforte, F., & Lo Nigro, R. (2026). Insights into ALD Growth of Al-Based Dielectric Stack on 4H-SiC. Nanomaterials, 16(12), 782. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano16120782

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop