Next Article in Journal
Ternary Logic Design Based on Novel Tunneling-Drift-Diffusion Field-Effect Transistors
Previous Article in Journal
Tunable Emission Properties of Sb3+/Pb2+ Co-Doped Cs7Cd3Br13 for Optical Anti-Counterfeiting Application
Previous Article in Special Issue
Transparent Zinc Oxide Memristor Structures: Magnetron Sputtering of Thin Films, Resistive Switching Investigation, and Crossbar Array Fabrication
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fabrication of High-Quality MoS2/Graphene Lateral Heterostructure Memristors

National Institute of Materials Physics, Atomistilor 405A, 077125 Magurele, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Nanomaterials 2025, 15(16), 1239; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15161239
Submission received: 2 July 2025 / Revised: 27 July 2025 / Accepted: 7 August 2025 / Published: 13 August 2025

Abstract

Integrating two-dimensional transition-metal dichalcogenides with graphene is attractive for low-power memory and neuromorphic hardware, yet sequential wet transfer leaves polymer residues and high contact resistance. We demonstrate a complementary metal–oxide–semiconductor (CMOS)-compatible, transfer-free route in which an atomically thin amorphous MoS2 precursor is RF-sputtered directly onto chemical vapor-deposited few-layer graphene and crystallized by confined-space sulfurization at 800 °C. Grazing-incidence X-ray reflectivity, Raman spectroscopy, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy confirm the formation of residue-free, three-to-four-layer 2H-MoS2 (roughness: 0.8–0.9 nm) over 1.5 cm × 2 cm coupons. Lateral MoS2/graphene devices exhibit reproducible non-volatile resistive switching with a set transition (SET) near +6 V and an analogue ON/OFF ≈2.1, attributable to vacancy-induced Schottky-barrier modulation. The single-furnace magnetron sputtering + sulfurization sequence avoids toxic H2S, polymer transfer steps, and high-resistance contacts, offering a cost-effective pathway toward wafer-scale 2D memristors compatible with back-end CMOS temperatures.

1. Introduction

The extraordinary electronic, optical, and mechanical properties of two-dimensional (2D) van der Waals materials have stimulated intense research into heterostructures that integrate complementary layers within a few atomic planes. Graphene provides ultrahigh room-temperature carrier mobility (103–104 cm2 V−1 s−1) but lacks an intrinsic band-gap, whereas single-layer MoS2 displays a direct gap of ≈1.8 eV, together with strong light–matter interaction and sizable spin–valley coupling [1]. Stacking MoS2 on graphene therefore combines a gate-tunable semiconducting channel with a transparent, low-resistance electrode. For instance, inserting a graphene interlayer between Ag contacts and chemical-vapor deposition (CVD) MoS2 raised the field-effect mobility to 35 cm2 V−1 s−1 and boosted photoresponsivity to 2160 A W−1, four orders of magnitude above devices with conventional Ti/Au contacts [2]. Beyond charge-injection benefits, interfacial coupling can modulate the quasiparticle gap of MoS2 from ≈2.23 eV to 1.98 eV, providing a route to band-gap engineering unavailable in the isolated constituents [3].
At the same time, both layers are mechanically robust, bendable, and lattice mismatch-tolerant, making MoS2/graphene stacks attractive for flexible opto-electronics and memory applications [4]. Recent first-principle modelling further highlights the versatility of such van der Waals stacks, showing that Ni-decorated WS2/WSe2 heterostructures can serve as highly sensitive, reusable gas sensors for C2H2 and C2H4 in transformer oil diagnostics [5]. Because the Fermi level of graphene can be electrostatically or chemically tuned, MoS2/graphene junctions offer a platform for adjustable Schottky barriers that are attractive for photodetection, neuromorphic weighting, and low-power logic [6].
Translating these attributes into wafer-scale devices requires fabrication strategies that deliver large-area, crystalline MoS2/graphene interfaces with minimal contamination. Layer-by-layer CVD can, in principle, realize such heterostructures; Kim et al. reported monolayer MoS2 grown on graphene-coated sapphire across a four-inch wafer via metal–organic CVD [7]. However, multi-step CVD demands costly reactors and stringent integration sequences to avoid degrading the first-grown layer. Sequential wet transfer (e.g., polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA)-assisted lift-off of CVD graphene, followed by stacking on CVD MoS2), is simpler but introduces cracks, wrinkles, and polymer residues that pin the Fermi level and degrade mobility [8]. Polymer-free dry-transfer methods using visco-elastic or h-BN stamps achieve atomically clean interfaces and record mobilities [9], but they remain restricted to microscope-scale flakes.
Physical-vapor routes that decouple film formation from crystallization have emerged as a pragmatic alternative. In a “sputter-then-sulfurize” scheme, a metal Mo or amorphous MoS2 precursor is deposited at room temperature and subsequently annealed in a sulfur-rich atmosphere to yield crystalline MoS2. Li et al. converted ultrathin Mo films to monolayer MoS2 by enclosing the sample and sulfur powder in a sealed quartz sandwich, obtaining centimeter-scale single crystals [10]. Graphite-box confinement further improves sulfur utilization and suppresses oxidation, but most demonstrations have focused on MoS2 films grown on inert substrates; the direct growth of high-quality MoS2 on graphene remains scarcely explored.
In parallel, MoS2-based memristors have attracted attention for non-volatile memory and neuromorphic computing. Despite rapid progress, MoS2-based memristors continue to face critical material-integration challenges. Vertical metal/MoS2/metal (MIM) stacks can deliver ON/OFF ratios exceeding 104 but require an initial electroforming step and often degrade by stochastic filament growth at high current densities [11]. Lateral planar architectures dispense with forming and allow in-plane neuromorphic weighting, yet most rely on polymer-assisted transfer of MoS2 or graphene, leaving behind residues that pin the Fermi level, raise contact resistance, and limit endurance [12]. Direct CVD growth on graphene has produced wafer-scale monolayers, but temperatures above 750 °C exceed the 450 °C back-end-of-line (BEOL) ceiling of advanced complementary metal–oxide–semiconductors (CMOSs) [13] and risk sulfur diffusion into Cu interconnects [14]. Ionic-liquid gating can lower operating voltages at the expense of process complexity and volatility [15]. Consequently, a transfer-free, BEOL-compatible route capable of Å-level thickness control and polymer-free MoS2/graphene interfaces remains elusive. Lateral two-terminal devices based on monolayer MoS2 reported by Shen et al. switch via sulfur-vacancy drift with ON/OFF ratios below ten and set voltages of ~6 V [16]. Xiong et al. achieved similar barrier-modulated behavior in oxygen-doped MoS2 with ±5 V sweeps [17]. Graphene electrodes can stabilize these trap-assisted mechanisms while providing low series resistance, as shown by Dragoman et al. in MoS2 self-switching diodes [18]. A scalable method that forms the MoS2 channel directly on graphene would therefore streamline fabrication of memristive cross-bars.
Here, we report a cost-effective two-step route, Å-level RF sputtering of an amorphous MoS2 precursor, followed by confined-space sulfurization at 800 °C, that generates centimeter-scale, few-layer MoS2 directly on chemical vapor-deposited graphene. The confined-sulfurization strategy reported here addresses the existing gaps by converting an RF-sputtered amorphous precursor into a uniform three-to-four-layer 2H-MoS2 sheet directly on graphene at 800 °C, well below front-end peak temperatures. The process precludes polymer contamination, preserves graphene conductivity, and yields forming-free, interface-controlled switching suitable for analog neuromorphic hardware. Comprehensive structural and chemical characterization confirms the formation of uniform, three-to-four-layer 2H-MoS2 with near-stoichiometric composition and sub-nanometer roughness. Lateral Au/MoS2/graphene devices exhibit reproducible, non-volatile resistive switching with a threshold of ~6 V and ON/OFF ≈ 2.1, consistent with vacancy-assisted Schottky-barrier modulation rather than filament formation.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Substrate Preparation and Graphene Growth

Commercial 100 mm Si wafers with 300 nm thermally grown SiO2 (MicroChemicals GmbH, Ulm, Germany) were diced into 15 mm × 20 mm coupons. Coupons were sequentially rinsed in acetone, isopropanol, and de-ionized (DI) water (5 min each in an ultrasonic bath), and then they were finally exposed for 2 min to a low-power (50 W, 200 mTorr) O2 plasma to remove organic residues.
Few-layer graphene (FLG) was synthesized on 25 µm Cu foil (99.8%, Alfa Aesar, Massachusetts, U.S.) in an AS-ONE rapid thermal CVD reactor (Annealsys, Montpellier, France). After H2 annealing (1000 °C, 50 sccm, 10 mbar, 10 min), the foil was exposed to CH4:H2 = 24:8 sccm at 900 °C for 10 min, leading to three to four graphene layers [19].
Graphene was transferred to the SiO2/Si coupons using a polymer-assisted bubbling method [19]. A 400 nm PMMA (950 K, A4) layer was spin-cast (4000 rpm, 60 s) and soft-baked (65 °C, 3 min). Electrochemical delamination was carried out in 0.5 M NaCl with the PMMA/graphene/Cu stack as cathode (–1.8 V vs. Ag/AgCl) and a Pt mesh as anode. The floating PMMA/graphene film was rinsed in DI water (3×) and placed onto the target SiO2/Si substrate, dried at 65 °C (10 min) and 150 °C (30 min), and the PMMA was removed in hot acetone (50 °C, 2 h). Raman mapping of transferred films yielded an I2D/IG ratio of ≈0.85, consistent with three to four graphene layers [4].

2.2. Amorphous MoS2 Precursor Deposition

Ultrathin amorphous MoS2 (a-MoS2) precursor films were deposited in a custom-built cylindrical sputtering chamber [20]. A 50 mm MoS2 target (99.9%, Mateck, Jülich, Germany) was ignited in RF mode at 16 W, while 30 sccm Ar maintained 5 × 10−3 Torr. The FLG/SiO2/Si coupon was mounted 11 cm above the target on a rotating holder (20 rpm) to ensure uniformity. Step-height measurements by AFM yielded a growth rate of 0.027 nm s−1; deposition times of 30 s and 37 s therefore produced 0.8 nm and 1.0 nm a-MoS2, respectively. For heterostructure samples, an aluminum shadow mask shielded one-third of the graphene, yielding discrete graphene-only overlap (MoS2/graphene) and MoS2-only zones (Figure 1d).

2.3. Confined-Space Sulfurization

Sulfurization was conducted in an MTI GSL-1600X three-zone furnace equipped with a 50 mm ID fused-quartz tube. Each sample, together with 25 mg elemental sulfur (99.5%, Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany), was sealed in a graphite box to maintain a high local sulfur vapor pressure [21]. After three pump-and-purge cycles (base pressure: 5 × 10−2 mbar), the tube was back-filled with 100 sccm Ar to 0.02 MPa and heated to 800 °C at 10 °C min−1. A 45 min dwell yielded complete conversion of a-MoS2 to crystalline 2H-MoS2 while preserving the underlying graphene. The 800 °C dwell was selected because it lies above the amorphous-to-2H crystallization threshold yet below the 1T metastability window. Absence of alkali intercalants further suppresses the metallic 1T phase, as verified by the E12g/A1g Raman doublet and the Mo 3d binding energy of 228.5 eV characteristic of 2H-MoS2. The sealed graphite box serves two purposes: (i) it traps sublimed sulfur in the immediate vicinity of the sample, sustaining a high local sulfur chemical potential even as the outer quartz tube is purged; and (ii) in combination with the Ar back-fill to 0.02 MPa (~150 Torr), it establishes a moderate total pressure regime that mitigates sulfur-vacancy formation during the 800 °C dwell. Islam et al. systematically varied sulfurization pressure (50–300 Torr) for Mo thin films and showed that higher pressures suppress vacancy-related Raman satellites, narrow the A1g linewidth, and improve electronic transport [22]. Related confined-space or sealed sulfurization approaches have been reported to enhance crystallinity and stoichiometry in magnetron sputtering-derived or vapor-converted ultrathin MoS2 films [21,23,24]. This approach maximizes sulfur availability, preserves the graphene underlayer, and avoids oxide formation.

2.4. Structural and Chemical Characterization

X-ray reflectivity (XRR), grazing-incidence XRD (Vertical GIXRD, θi = 0.2°), and grazing-incidence in-plane XRD (Horizontal GIXRD, θi = θd = 0.2°) were recorded on a Rigaku SmartLab diffractometer equipped with a Cu Kα source (λ = 1.54178 Å) and a HyPix-3000 0D detector (Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).
Raman spectra and maps were obtained with a LabRAM HR Evolution spectrometer (Horiba Jobin Yvon, Palaiseau, France), using 532 nm and 633 nm excitations, through an Olympus 100× objective (NA = 0.9). Laser power was kept below 1 mW; the Si phonon at 519.8 cm−1 provided the calibration. Spectra were fitted with Voigt profiles to extract the E12g and A1g positions for layer counting [1].
Topography was acquired in non-contact mode (NT-MDT Aura) with 10 µm × 10 µm scans; areal roughness Sq was calculated with Gwyddion v2.69. Surface morphology and composition were examined on a ZEISS Gemini-500 FE-SEM (3 kV, InLens detector, Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) equipped with a Bruker EDS system (Billerica, Massachusetts, U.S.).
Surface chemical states were examined with a Kratos AXIS Ultra DLD XPS system (Kratos Analytical Ltd., Manchester, UK, monochromatic Al Kα, 12 kV × 12 mA, pass energy 20 eV). Spectra were charge-neutralized in situ and aligned to the graphene C 1s sp2 signal at 284.6 eV; Voigt profiles and Shirley backgrounds were fitted in CasaXPS v2.3.

2.5. Device Fabrication and Electrical Testing

Metal contacts were defined by shadow-mask sputtering: 5 nm Ti/30 nm Au was deposited through precision stainless-steel masks (Ossila, Sheffield, UK). Current–voltage characteristics were measured under ambient conditions with a Keithley 4200A-SCS (Cleveland, Ohio, US); low-bias sweeps employed ±3 V at 0.1 V s−1, whereas resistive-switching measurements used ±7 V with a 10 mA compliance limit.

3. Results

3.1. Process Scheme and Heterostructure Architecture

Figure 1 summarizes the two-step route adopted to obtain high-quality, centimeter-scale MoS2/graphene heterostructures on SiO2/Si. In the first step (Figure 1a), an ultrathin amorphous MoS2 (a-MoS2) precursor is radio frequency-sputtered onto chemical vapor-deposited few-layer graphene (FLG, ≈1.3 nm, three to four layers). A confined-space sulfurization at 800 °C (Figure 1b,c) then crystallizes the precursor into 2H-MoS2 while fully preserving the underlying graphene, a strategy that minimizes polymer or oxide contamination compared with conventional wet-transfer stacking [21].
The resulting coupon is deliberately partitioned into three lateral zones, graphene-only, heterostructure (MoS2/graphene), and MoS2-only, using a shadow mask during precursor deposition (Figure 1d). This geometry enables direct, same-wafer comparison of (i) the intrinsic graphene sheet resistance, (ii) the electrical behavior of the heterointerface, and (iii) the contribution of the stand-alone MoS2 film. Such a design has been advocated as the best practice for 2D heterostructure electronics [25].
Compared with sequential wet-transfer assembly, the present route offers three advantages. First, the magnetron sputtering + sulfurization sequence is compatible with large-area industrial tooling, avoids the handling of toxic H2S, and yields highly uniform films over at least 1.5 cm × 2 cm. Second, the van der Waals interface between MoS2 and graphene is formed in situ, obviating polymer residues that notoriously pin the Fermi level in transferred stacks [26]. Third, graphene acts as an atomically flat growth template and as a built-in current spreading layer, both of which are beneficial for the electrical robustness of laterally configured memristors.

3.2. Thickness Calibration and Crystallization of Ultrathin MoS2

Figure 2 corroborates the film thickness obtained from the sputter-time calibration and follows the structural evolution of the amorphous precursor during confined sulfurization. Atomic force-microscopy step-height measurements (Figure 2a) yield a linear growth rate of 0.027 nm s−1; sputtering for 30 s and 37 s therefore deposits ≈ 0.8 nm and ≈1.0 nm of amorphous MoS2, respectively.
The corresponding X-ray-reflectivity profiles (Figure 2b) display only faint, rapidly damped Kiessig fringes in the as-deposited state, indicative of a low-density, highly disordered film. After sulfurization, the fringe amplitude increases, and the oscillation period shifts slightly toward higher scattering vectors, signifying densification of the MoS2 layer and a modest contraction of the overall film thickness as the amorphous network relaxes into the more closely packed 2H lattice. Because the residual thickness is close to the critical value at which XRR fitting becomes unreliable for Cu Kα radiation, no numerical thickness or density values are extracted; nonetheless, the qualitative changes are entirely consistent with a transition from an amorphous to a crystalline, continuous sheet.
We note that sulfur availability and ambient pressure strongly influence the degree of crystallization and the density of sulfur vacancies in MoS2 formed from sputtered precursors. Islam et al. reported that raising the sulfurization chamber pressure from 50 to 300 Torr markedly reduced defect-related Raman satellites and produced smoother, more conductive MoS2 films [22]. Our confined graphite-box geometry, operated under an Ar back-pressure of 0.02 MPa (~150 Torr), is intended to mimic the “high-pressure/high-S” regime that favors near-stoichiometric conversion. This rationale is consistent with prior confined or high-S conversions of sputter-derived Mo or MoS2 precursors that achieved improved 2H texture and device performance [21,23,24]. The stoichiometric Mo:S ratios and strong Raman response we observe after sulfurization indicate that the approach is effective even for sub-nanometer starting thicknesses.
The crystalline signal obtained from grazing-incidence X-ray diffraction is strongly constrained by the extreme thinness of the present films. In the vertical configuration (incidence angle 0.20°), both the 0.8 nm and 1.0 nm sulfurized samples exhibit a broad, low-intensity background that is dominated by the amorphous SiO2 layer and the Si substrate (Figure 2c, top). Within the signal-to-noise limits of the measurement, no unambiguous (002) reflection of 2H-MoS2 can be distinguished at 2θ ≈ 13° for either film. The absence of clear peaks in this geometry therefore reflects the detection limit of the technique for ultrathin (<2 nm) layers rather than proof that the material remains amorphous.
In the horizontal (in-plane) geometry, where the detector is scanned in the sample surface plane, weak diffraction maxima attributable to the (100) and (110) families of 2H-MoS2 are discernible for the 1.0 nm specimen, whereas they remain below the noise level for the 0.8 nm film (Figure 2d). The appearance of these in-plane reflections, albeit faint, implies that the 1.0 nm layer has crystallized with the van der Waals planes parallel to the graphene substrate, consistent with the ⟨00l⟩ texture reported for similarly thin sputter-derived MoS2 films after sulfurization [27].

3.3. Raman Confirmation of Crystallinity and Spatially Selective Heterostructure Formation

Raman spectra provide a highly sensitive probe to both layer number and structural order for ultra-thin MoS2 films that are close to the X-ray detection limit and for evaluating any damage to the underlying graphene. Figure 3a compares 532 nm spectra collected on the 0.8 nm and 1.0 nm specimens before and after sulfurization. The amorphous precursors show only the Si substrate mode at 519 cm−1, whereas the annealed films reveal the two first-order modes of 2H-MoS2, E12g at 385 ± 1 cm−1 and A1g at 406 ± 1 cm−1. The mode separation, Δω ≈ 21 cm−1, corresponds to three to four S–Mo–S trilayers, in agreement with calibrated AFM step heights [1].
Excitation at 633 nm (Figure 3b) enhances multiphonon processes. Two resonant acoustic combinations are observed at 178 cm−1 [LA(M) −TA(M)] and 227 cm−1 [first-order LA(M)], followed by the weak p1 band at 416 cm−1 [LA(K) + TA(K)] and a dominant 2LA(M) overtone at 456 ± 2 cm−1. These second-order features require long-range crystalline order and confirm that even the 0.8 nm film is fully crystallized, although its X-ray signature is below the GIXRD detection limit [28,29]. A separate α (A1g + E22g) band at ≈440 cm−1 is not resolved, a common situation for few-layer MoS2 measured with moderate laser power.
Figure 3c displays 532 nm spectra acquired at three lateral positions on the 0.8 nm coupon: graphene-only, overlap (MoS2/graphene), and MoS2-only. The graphene zone shows the expected G (1582 cm−1) and 2D (2700 cm−1) bands together with a moderate D band (≈1350 cm−1). The intensity ratio ID/IG ≈ 0.90 yields an in-plane crystallite size of La ≈ 22 nm according to the Tuinstra–Koenig relation recalibrated for 532 nm excitation [30]. The essentially identical ratio measured in the MoS2/graphene overlap indicates that the sputter–sulfurization sequence does not introduce additional, local disorder into graphene beyond that already set by the high-temperature exposure and the initial CVD transfer. A shoulder at ≈1446 cm−1, pronounced in the graphene spectrum, weak in the overlap, and absent in the MoS2-only area, originates from the 2TO phonon of the Si substrate and is attenuated as the overlayer becomes optically opaquer.
Identical trends are observed on the 1.0 nm coupon (Figure 3d). The spatially selective coexistence of graphene and MoS2 modes confirms that the shadow-mask strategy yields sharp lateral heterojunctions, while the constant Δω across the coupon demonstrates thickness uniformity, in agreement with the AFM maps (Figure 4a,b).

3.4. Surface Morphology and Stoichiometry of the Sulfurized MoS2 Films and the MoS2/Graphene Heterostructure

Atomic force-microscopy height maps (Figure 4a,b) demonstrate that both the 0.8 nm and 1.0 nm sulfurized films form continuous, featureless blankets over the centimeter-scale coupon. The areal root mean-square roughness is Sq = 0.81 nm and Sq = 0.85 nm, respectively, values typical for few-layer MoS2 grown on atomically flat supports and fully compatible with the roughness window reported for sputter-converted MoS2 on sapphire (0.7–1.0 nm) [31]. No pin-holes or line defects are observed, confirming that the densification inferred from XRR extends laterally across the entire film.
A representative high-resolution SEM micrograph of the overlap region (Figure 4c) reveals a compact nanograined surface composed of 30–50 nm crystallites. Such morphology is characteristic of ultrathin sputter-derived MoS2 that recrystallizes under sulfur-rich conditions and has previously been correlated with reduced trap density in memristive devices [27]. Importantly, no cracks, delamination, or graphene wrinkles emerge after the 800 °C treatment, underscoring the mechanical compatibility of the two-step process.
The corresponding energy-dispersive X-ray spectrum, collected at 20 kV on the same area (Figure 4d), is dominated by the overlapping Mo Lα (2.293 keV) and S Kα (2.307 keV) lines. Quantification after overlap correction gives Mo:S atomic ratios of 1:1.2 for the 0.8 nm film and 1:1.5 for the 1.0 nm film. These sulfur-deficient values are typical for ultrathin MoS2 analyzed by EDS, where the interaction volume is small and the Mo/S peak overlap systematically underestimates sulfur. Importantly, no foreign elements are detected above the noise level, confirming that the confined-space sulfurization introduces no extraneous contamination.

3.5. Chemical-State Analysis by X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy

High-resolution X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) clarifies both the chemical purity of the confined-space process and the extent of sulfurization achieved in the ultrathin films. In the Mo 3d + S 2s window (Figure 5a), the 1 nm and the 0.8 nm samples are dominated by the Mo 3d5/2/3d3/2 doublet at 228.5/231.6 eV, characteristic of Mo4+ in 2H-MoS2 [28]. A weak high-binding-energy shoulder centered at 232.7 eV is assigned to surface MoO3 that forms upon brief air exposure; quantitative fitting yields Mo6+ fractions of 22% (1 nm) and 14% (0.8 nm). Importantly, no metallic Mo or sub-stoichiometric MoOx signals are detected, confirming complete sulfur incorporation throughout the film thickness.
The S 2p spectra (Figure 5b) consist exclusively of the S2−2p3/2/2p1/2 doublet at 161.6/162.8 eV; no sulphate-related shoulders appear above 168 eV, corroborating the absence of adventitious oxidation during annealing. The Mo:S atomic ratios extracted from peak areas, 1:1.95 (1 nm) and 1:1.50 (0.8 nm), deviate slightly from the ideal 1:2, consistent with the scatter typically reported for mono-/few-layer MoS2 where XPS quantification is affected by overlayer attenuation and local non-stoichiometry [32]. Importantly, no Na, Cl, or Cu residues from the graphene transfer are observed above the detection limit (<0.2 at %), underscoring the chemical cleanliness of the overall fabrication sequence. See Table 1 for quantitative peak parameters.
The confined sulfur flux efficiently converts the amorphous precursor without introducing foreign contaminants; the modest surface oxide is typical for sputter-derived MoS2 films stored in ambient conditions and can be removed by a brief 200 °C Ar/H2 anneal.

3.6. Electrical Transport and Memristive Behavior

Figure 6 compares the low-bias conductance of the three lateral paths patterned on each coupon with the high-field switching response of the MoS2/graphene heterostructure. At low bias (±3 V, Figure 6a), the current–voltage characteristics are plotted on a semi-logarithmic scale to emphasize the wide dynamic range. The graphene–graphene trace (black, Figure 6a) is quasi-ohmic for forward bias with a sheet resistance of 1.9 kΩ sq−1. This falls in the 1–5 kΩ sq−1 range typical for transferred, few-layer CVD graphene with an in-plane crystallite size La ≈ 20 nm (as inferred from ID/IG ≈ 0.9) [30].
The MoS2–MoS2 path (red) is two orders of magnitude less conductive with a channel resistance of ≈300 kΩ and a sheet resistance of ≈4 × 105 Ω sq−1, in line with lateral transport through a 2 nm thick 2H-MoS2 sheet. The mixed graphene–MoS2 configuration (blue) lies between these limits and exhibits a small volatile hysteresis, the reverse sweep retraces a slightly lower current than the forward sweep, consistent with reversible Schottky-barrier modulation at the MoS2/graphene interface [25].
When the bias on the graphene–MoS2 pair is extended to ±7 V (Figure 6b), a SET transition occurs at ≈+6 V, with an ON/OFF ratio of ≈2.1. The non-volatile change is reproducible over several cycles and is characteristic of interfacial charge-trap mechanisms [33]. The reverse sweep to −7 V partially resets the device, consistent with vacancy detrapping or back-diffusion, as illustrated in Figure 7. The optical micrographs in the inset of Figure 6a,b identify the electrode pairs used; contact pads were defined by Ti/Au shadow-mask sputtering. All measurements were performed in ambient air, at room temperature, with a 10 mA compliance to prevent device breakdown.

3.7. Proposed Switching Mechanism

The electrical data of Figure 6 are consistent with a trap-assisted, interface-controlled mechanism rather than with metallic filament formation. Under a forward bias of +6 V, the electric field across the few-layer MoS2 is on the order of 3 MV cm−1, sufficient to drift pre-existing sulfur vacancies Vs toward the MoS2/graphene boundary, where they accumulate and locally pin negative charge (Figure 7, left → right). Density-functional calculations show that chains of sulfur vacancies separated by less than 0.5 nm create mid-gap states that pin the Fermi level and sharply reduce the Schottky-barrier height, ΦB, at MoS2/graphene contacts [34]. A similar vacancy-induced band-bending has been exploited in CZTS photovoltaics, where nanoscale MoS2 layers act as back-surface fields: Banerjee et al. demonstrated via comprehensive device modelling that controlled Vs densities of 1012–1013 cm−2 lower interface recombination and shift ΦB by more than 0.2 eV [35]. Abo El-Ezz et al. further confirmed, by XPS and simulation, that Vs accumulation at MoS2/CZTS hetero-interfaces tunes carrier selectivity [36]. Extrapolating these findings to our lateral geometry, the forward bias of +6 V drifts pre-existing Vs toward the MoS2/graphene junction, narrowing ΦB and switching the device from a high-resistance to a low-resistance state. The ON/OFF ≈ 2 is thus fully consistent with a barrier-controlled, rather than filamentary, mechanism [37].
Atomic-resolution STEM + EELS has visualized exactly this process: Hus et al. tracked an Au atom drifting into and out of a single S-vacancy in monolayer MoS2, producing reversible ON/OFF ≈ 3 switching via local ΦB modulation [38]. Conductive-AFM noise spectroscopy further shows that individual Vs sites hop between neutral and negatively charged states on sub-second timescales, directly linking vacancy charge to lateral-device hysteresis [39].

4. Discussion

The present study demonstrates that a transfer-free, magnetron sputtering + confined-sulfurization route can convert sub-nanometer amorphous MoS2 precursors into continuous, few-layer 2H-MoS2 directly on CVD graphene without introducing detectable contamination or additional carbon-lattice disorder. Raman analysis (Δω ≈ 21 cm−1) and AFM roughness (Sq ≈ 0.8–0.9 nm) place the films squarely in the three-to-four-layer regime, consistent with seminal thickness calibrations by Lee et al. (Δω = 20–22 cm−1 for trilayer MoS2) [1]. The inability of vertical-geometry GIXRD to resolve MoS2 peaks is therefore attributed to the intrinsic detection limit for ≤2 nm layers rather than to incomplete crystallization. The appearance of resonant LA(M)–TA(M) (≈178 cm−1) and 2LA(M) (≈456 cm−1) Raman bands (Figure 3b) is a hallmark of long-range order in 2H-MoS2 and is absent in amorphous Mo–S [28,29,40]. Second, the Mo 3d5/2 full width at half maximum (FWHM = 1.03 eV) matches values reported for crystalline few-layer MoS2 and is much narrower than the 1.4–1.6 eV typical of amorphous phases [41]. These signatures confirm that both the 0.8 nm and 1.0 nm films are fully crystallized, even though their X-ray scattering volume lies below the GIXRD detection threshold.
Electrically, the lateral heterojunction yields a low-bias conduction hierarchy, Igraphene > Igraphene–MoS2 > IMoS2. The measured graphene sheet resistance (~1.9 kΩ sq1 after the 800 °C dwell) lies within the typical few-kΩ sq1 range reported for large-area monolayer/few-layer CVD graphene after post-treatments, and is consistent with literature values for wafer-scale films and directly grown graphene on SiO2 [4]. Under ±7 V sweeps the heterostructure switches non-volatility with an ON/OFF ≈ 2.1, comparable to trap-assisted, barrier-modulated MoS2 memristors in the sub-5 nm thickness regime (ON/OFF < 10, VSET ≈ 5–6 V) described by Shen et al. [16] and Xiong et al. [17]. In these devices, vacancy drift or charge trapping at the MoS2/metal (or MoS2/graphene) interface narrows the Schottky barrier, producing modest resistance windows yet excellent analog tunability, attributes desirable for neuromorphic weighting [33]. The identical mechanism is corroborated here by the small hysteresis loop at ±3 V, the SET at +6 V, and the partial RESET upon polarity reversal, all captured schematically in Figure 7.
From a fabrication perspective, the confined-space graphite box enables efficient sulfur usage (<30 mg) and eliminates toxic H2S, while the sputtered precursor affords Å-level thickness control. Compared with open-tube CVD of MoS2 on transferred graphene, which often yields uncontrolled multilayer islands or polymer-contaminated interfaces, the present route forms a chemically clean, laterally uniform heterostructure in a single furnace cycle. Li et al. demonstrated monolayer MoS2 growth in a sealed “sandwich” reactor [10]; our results extend the confined concept to wafer-compatible sputtering, producing smoother films (Sq ≈ 0.8 nm) than the wrinkled 20 nm RMS MoS2 obtained in similar two-step sputter systems [16].
Although the ON/OFF ratio extracted from Figure 6b is modest (≈2.1), such values are typical of vacancy- or barrier-modulated lateral MoS2 devices designed for analogue neuromorphic weighting rather than binary storage. Table 2 benchmarks our result against recent peers that employ sub-5 nm MoS2 channels and rely on interface charge trapping or S-vacancy drift rather than conductive filaments. Shen et al. reported ON/OFF ≈ 2.0 at VSET ≈ 6 V in single-crystal monolayer MoS2 synapses and explicitly attributed the switching to reversible Schottky-barrier modulation [16]. Xiong et al. achieved ON/OFF ≈ 2–3 in oxygen-passivated few-layer MoS2, again through controlled interface-trap filling rather than filament formation [17]. These results confirm that our device performance lies within the accepted range for analogue 2D memristors. Comparable vacancy-drift lateral MoS2 memristors achieve 103–104 endurance cycles and >103 s retention once lithographic contacts and encapsulation are implemented [16,17].
Moreover, modest resistance windows can be advantageous for multi-level conductance updates because they afford fine, symmetric weight tuning without abrupt jumps that plague high-contrast filamentary cells. Future optimization could explore intentional S-vacancy engineering (e.g., gentle Ar-plasma treatment) or dual-gate electrostatic modulation to enlarge the resistance window, or the insertion of an ultrathin h-BN tunnelling layer to suppress leakage or lower-temperature plasma-assisted sulfurization (≤450 °C) to render the process fully back-end-of-line compatible [42,43]. Additionally, integrating optical gating, as demonstrated for MoS2/graphene photomemristors [17], could yield multifunctional nodes that combine sensing and weight storage in a single laterally patterned element.
From a semiconductor-manufacturing perspective, two integration aspects merit comment. First, although the present demonstration used an 800 °C dwell to maximize crystallinity, plasma-assisted or rapid thermal sulfurization has recently achieved fully crystalline 2H-MoS2 at ≤450 °C on 300 mm wafers, within the thermal budget of advanced Cu/low-κ back-end stacks [44]. Because the amorphous precursor is deposited at room temperature, the peak process temperature can therefore be reduced without altering film-thickness control. Second, the graphite box confines the sulfur source (<30 mg) and suppresses ambient sulfur partial pressure, mitigating Cu embrittlement. Established diffusion barriers such as few-layer h-BN or sputtered TaN block S ingress below the 1013 atoms cm−2 are limited at 400 °C [14], and they can be inserted with no change to the two-step flow.
Overall, the results position the magnetron sputtering + confined-sulfurization approach as a simple, CMOS-scalable path to lateral MoS2/graphene memories, bridging the gap between fundamental 2D heterostructure physics and manufacturable neuromorphic hardware.

5. Conclusions

In this work, we have demonstrated that a simple two-step route, Å-level RF sputtering of an amorphous MoS2 precursor, followed by confined-space sulfurization at 800 °C, can fabricate centimeter-scale MoS2/graphene lateral heterostructures without resorting to polymer-assisted layer transfer or toxic H2S. Raman spectroscopy and AFM show that the converted film is uniformly three to four S–Mo–S trilayers thick, while XPS confirms an almost-ideal Mo:S ratio of 1:2 with only a thin surface oxide. The underlying graphene preserves its pre-anneal defect density and attains a sheet resistance of about 1.9 kΩ sq−1. Electrical measurements reveal a reproducible, non-volatile SET transition at approximately +6 V; the read-state current increases by a factor of two, a behavior that we attribute to sulfur-vacancy accumulation and attendant narrowing of the MoS2/graphene Schottky barrier. Although the ON/OFF ratio is modest, it matches values reported for other sub-5 nm MoS2 devices in which barrier modulation, not filament formation, dominates the resistive change, and is already sufficient for analogue synaptic weighting in neuromorphic circuits. The structural, chemical and electrical data position the magnetron sputtering + confined-sulfurization protocol as an industry-compatible route to wafer-level 2D memristive elements. The minimal precursor load, the elimination of wet-transfer polymer cleaning, and the use of a single standard furnace step together make the methodology economically attractive for wafer-scale integration.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.M. and A.V.; methodology, C.M. and A.V.; formal analysis, F.S., I.-D.S., M.V., A.B., T.T., and M.Y.Z.; investigation, F.S., I.-D.S., A.B., T.T., and M.Y.Z.; resources, M.B. and A.V.; data curation, C.M., F.S., and I.-D.S.; writing—original draft preparation, C.M., I.-D.S., and A.V.; writing—review and editing, C.M., I.-D.S., F.S., M.V., A.B., T.T., M.Y.Z., M.B., and A.V.; visualization, C.M., I.-D.S., A.B., and F.S.; supervision, A.V.; project administration, A.V.; funding acquisition, A.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by a grant of the Ministry of Research, Innovation and Digitization, CCCDI—UEFISCDI, project number PN-IV-P7-7.1-PED-2024-2412 (contract no. 11PED/2025), within PNCDI IV and the Romanian Ministry of Research, Innovation, and Digitalization for the Core Program of the National Institute of Materials Physics through Project PC3-PN23080303.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed toward the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

During the preparation of this manuscript the authors used Open AI ChatGPT-4, o3 model for the purposes of language-related edits, including grammar, punctuation, and spelling. The authors have reviewed and edited the output and take fully responsible for the content of this publication.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Lee, C.; Yan, H.; Brus, L.E.; Heinz, T.F.; Hone, J.; Ryu, S. Anomalous lattice vibrations of single- and few-layer MoS2. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 2695–2700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chee, S.; Seo, D.; Kim, H.; Jang, H.; Lee, S.; Moon, S.P.; Lee, K.H.; Kim, S.W.; Choi, H.; Ham, M. Lowering the Schottky Barrier Height by Graphene/Ag Electrodes for High-Mobility MoS2 Field-Effect Transistors. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1804422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Wördenweber, H.; Grundmann, A.; Wang, Z.; Hoffmann-Eifert, S.; Kalisch, H.; Vescan, A.; Heuken, M.; Waser, R.; Karthäuser, S. The MoS2-graphene-sapphire heterostructure: Influence of substrate properties on the MoS2 band structure. J. Phys. Chem. C 2023, 127, 10878–10887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bae, S.; Kim, H.; Lee, Y.; Xu, X.; Park, J.-S.; Zheng, Y.; Balakrishnan, J.; Lei, T.; Kim, H.R.; Song, Y.I.; et al. Roll-to-roll production of 30-inch graphene films for transparent electrodes. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2010, 5, 574–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Wu, H.; Zhong, S.; Bin, Y.; Jiang, X.; Cui, H. Ni-Decorated WS2–WSe2 Heterostructure as a Novel Sensing Candidate upon C2H2 and C2H4 in Oil-Filled Transformers: A First-Principles Investigation. Mol. Phys. 2025, e2492391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Di Bartolomeo, A. Graphene Schottky Diodes: An Experimental Review of the Rectifying Graphene/Semiconductor Heterojunction. Phys. Rep. 2016, 606, 1–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kim, H.-U.; Kim, M.; Jin, Y.; Hyeon, Y.; Kim, K.S.; An, B.-S.; Yang, C.-W.; Kanade, V.; Moon, J.-Y.; Yeom, G.Y.; et al. Low-temperature wafer-scale growth of MoS2–graphene heterostructures. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 470, 129–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Muñoz, R.; López-Elvira, E.; Munuera, C.; Frisenda, R.; Sánchez-Sánchez, C.; Martín-Gago, J.Á.; García-Hernández, M. Direct growth of graphene-MoS2 heterostructure: Tailored interface for advanced devices. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2022, 581, 151858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Banszerus, L.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Beschoten, B.; Stampfer, C. Dry transfer of CVD graphene using MoS2 -based stamps. Phys. Rapid Res. Lett. 2017, 11, 1700136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, D.; Xiao, Z.; Mu, S.; Wang, F.; Liu, Y.; Song, J.; Huang, X.; Jiang, L.; Xiao, J.; Liu, L.; et al. Space-confined sulphurization strategy for ultrathin MoS2 single crystals. Nano Lett. 2018, 18, 2021–2032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sangwan, V.K.; Lee, H.-S.; Bergeron, H.; Balla, I.; Beck, M.E.; Chen, K.-S.; Hersam, M.C. Multi-terminal memtransistors from polycrystalline monolayer molybdenum disulfide. Nature 2018, 554, 500–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, D.; Wu, B.; Zhu, X.; Wang, J.; Ryu, B.; Lu, W.D.; Liang, X. MoS2 memristors exhibiting variable switching characteristics toward biorealistic synaptic emulation. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 9240–9252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bala, A.; Sen, A.; Shim, J.; Gandla, S.; Kim, S. Back-end-of-line compatible large–area molybdenum disulfide grown on flexible substrate. ACS Nano 2023, 17, 13784–13791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lo, C.-L.; Catalano, M.; Smithe, K.K.H.; Wang, L.; Zhang, S.; Pop, E.; Kim, M.J.; Chen, Z. Two-dimensional h-BN and MoS2 as diffusion barriers in Cu interconnects. NPJ 2D Mater. Appl. 2017, 1, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhu, X.; Li, D.; Liang, X.; Lu, W.D. Ionic modulation in MoS2 neuromorphic devices. Nat. Mater. 2019, 18, 141–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Shen, J.; Zhao, M.; Liu, X.; Li, C.; Lin, X.; Zhang, K. Low-consumption two-terminal artificial synapse based on transfer-free single-crystal MoS2 memristor. Nanotechnology 2020, 31, 265202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Xiong, X.; Wu, F.; Ouyang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Z.; Tian, H.; Dong, M. Oxygen-incorporated MoS2 for rectification-mediated resistive switching and artificial neural network. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 33, 2213348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dragoman, M.; Aldrigo, M.; Dragoman, D.; Povey, I.M.; Iordanescu, S.; Dinescu, A.; Di Donato, A.; Modreanu, M. Multifunctionalities of 2D MoS2 self-switching diode as memristor and photodetector. Phys. E 2021, 126, 114451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Xu, X.; Dubuisson, E.; Bao, Q.; Lu, J.; Loh, K.P. Electrochemical delamination of CVD-grown graphene film: Toward the recyclable use of copper catalyst. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 9927–9933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mihai, C.; Sava, F.; Simandan, I.D.; Galca, A.C.; Burducea, I.; Becherescu, N.; Velea, A. Structural and optical properties of amorphous Si–Ge–Te thin films prepared by combinatorial sputtering. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 11845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Buruiană, A.T.; Bocirnea, A.E.; Sava, F.; Matei, E.; Tite, T.; Mariana, A.; Simandan, I.D.; Galca, A.C.; Velea, A. Two-step process for the fabrication of direct FLG/MoS2 heterostructures. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2024, 322, 129530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Islam, M.S.; Tiong, S.K.; Za’abar, F.I.; Doroody, C.; Zuhdi, A.W.M.; Bahrudin, M.S.; Feng, Z.J.; Cao, W.; Amin, N. Pressure-Dependent Sulfurization of Molybdenum Thin Films for High-Quality MoS2 Formation. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2025, 1500, 012020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tao, J.; Chai, J.; Lu, X.; Wong, L.M.; Wong, T.I.; Pan, J.; Xiong, Q.; Chi, D.; Wang, S. Growth of Wafer-Scale MoS2 Monolayer by Magnetron Sputtering. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 2497–2503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Campbell, P.M.; Perini, C.J.; Chiu, J.; Gupta, A.; Ray, H.S.; Chen, H.; Wenzel, K.; Snyder, E.; Wagner, B.K.; Ready, J.; et al. Plasma-Assisted Synthesis of MoS2. 2D Mater. 2017, 5, 015005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Roy, K.; Padmanabhan, M.; Goswami, S.; Sai, T.P.; Ramalingam, G.; Raghavan, S.; Ghosh, A. Graphene–MoS2 hybrid structures for multifunctional photo-responsive memory devices. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2013, 8, 826–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jariwala, D.; Sangwan, V.K.; Lauhon, L.J.; Marks, T.J.; Hersam, M.C. Emerging device applications for semiconducting two-dimensional transition-metal dichalcogenides. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 1102–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jung, Y.; Shen, J.; Liu, Y.; Woods, J.M.; Sun, Y.; Cha, J.J. Metal seed-layer-thickness-induced transition from vertical to horizontal growth of MoS2 and WS2. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 6842–6849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Frey, G.L.; Tenne, R.; Matthews, M.J.; Dresselhaus, M.S.; Dresselhaus, G. Raman and resonance Raman investigation of MoS2 nanoparticles. Phys. Rev. B 1999, 60, 2883–2892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gołasa, K.; Grzeszczyk, M.; Faugeras, C.; Leszczyński, P.; Wysmołek, A.; Potemski, M.; Babiński, A. Multiphonon resonant Raman scattering in MoS2. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 104, 092106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cançado, L.G.; Luo, Z.; Ferreira, E.H.M.; Elias, D.C.; Rodriguez, B.J.; Takai, K.; Jorio, A.; Magalhães-Paniago, R.; Dresselhaus, M.S.; Terrones, M.; et al. Quantifying defects in graphene via Raman spectroscopy at different excitation energies. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 3190–3196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Buruiana, A.T.; Bocirnea, A.E.; Kuncser, A.C.; Tite, T.; Matei, E.; Mihai, C.; Zawadzka, N.; Olkowska-Pucko, K.; Kipczak, Ł.; Babiński, A.; et al. Layered SnSe Nanoflakes with Anharmonic Phonon Properties and Memristive Characteristics. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2022, 599, 153983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kim, I.S.; Sangwan, V.K.; Jariwala, D.; Wood, J.D.; Park, S.; Chen, K.-S.; Shi, F.; Ruiz-Zepeda, F.; Ponce, A.; Jose-Yacaman, M.; et al. Influence of Stoichiometry on the Optical and Electrical Properties of Chemical Vapor Deposition Derived MoS2. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 10551–10558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ling, H.; Koutsouras, D.A.; Kazemzadeh, S.; van de Burgt, Y.; Yan, F.; Gkoupidenis, P. Electrolyte-gated transistors for synaptic electronics, neuromorphic computing and adaptable bio-interfacing. Small 2020, 16, 1902797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Padilha, J.E.; Pontes, R.B.; da Silva, A.J.R.; Fazzio, A. Vacancy-induced gap states in MoS2: Electronic structure and transport. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 105, 022105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Banerjee, A.; Das, B.; Chaudhuri, P.R. A comprehensive modelling on MoS2 interface and defect engineering in CZTS thin-film solar cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2020, 210, 110580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Abo El-Ezz, A.; Shawky, A.; Abdel-Rahim, M. MoS2 thin-film hetero-interface as effective back-surface field in CZTS-based solar cells. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2022, 592, 152802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sangwan, V.K.; Jariwala, D.; Kim, I.S.; Lauhon, L.J.; Marks, T.J.; Hersam, M.C. Gate-Tunable Memristive Phenomena Mediated by Grain Boundaries in Single-Layer MoS2. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2015, 10, 403–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hus, S.M.; Ge, R.; Chen, P.-A.; Liang, L.; Donnelly, G.E.; Ko, W.; Huang, F.; Chiang, M.-H.; Li, A.-P.; Akinwande, D. Observation of Single-Defect Memristor in an MoS2 Atomic Sheet. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2021, 16, 58–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Song, S.H.; Joo, M.-K.; Neumann, M.; Kim, H.; Lee, Y.H. Probing Defect Dynamics in Monolayer MoS2 via Noise Nanospectroscopy. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 2121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Chakraborty, B.; Matte, H.S.S.R.; Sood, A.K.; Rao, C.N.R. Layer-Dependent Resonant Raman Scattering of a Few-Layer MoS2. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2013, 44, 92–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kim, J.H.; Lee, J.; Kim, J.H.; Hwang, C.C.; Lee, C.; Park, J.Y. Work Function Variation of MoS2 Atomic Layers Grown with Chemical Vapor Deposition: The Effects of Thickness and the Adsorption of Water/Oxygen Molecules. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015, 106, 251606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rajput, M.; Mallik, S.K.; Chatterjee, S.; Shukla, A.; Hwang, S.; Sahoo, S.; Kumar, G.V.P.; Rahman, A. Defect-engineered monolayer MoS2 with enhanced memristive and synaptic functionality. Commun. Mater. 2024, 5, 190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Krishnaprasad, A.; Dev, D.; Shawkat, M.S.; Martinez-Martinez, R.; Islam, M.M.; Chung, H.-S.; Bae, T.-S.; Jung, Y.; Roy, T. Graphene/MoS2/SiOx memristive synapses for linear weight update. NPJ 2D Mater. Appl. 2023, 7, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Daus, A.; Vaziri, S.; Chen, V.; Köroğlu, Ç.; Grady, R.W.; Bailey, C.S.; Lee, H.R.; Schauble, K.; Brenner, K.; Pop, E. High-Performance Flexible Nanoscale Transistors Based on Transition Metal Dichalcogenides. Nat. Electron. 2021, 4, 495–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Two-step fabrication route of centimeter-scale MoS2/graphene heterostructures. (a) Cross-sectional schematic of the stack: few-layer graphene (FLG) on Si/SiO2 is coated with a ∼0.8–1 nm sputtered amorphous MoS2 film that is subsequently crystallized into few-layer (2–4 L) 2H-MoS2 during confined-space sulfurization; Au pads are added later for probing. (b) Photograph of the sealed graphite box loaded with elemental sulfur and the MoS2-coated FLG/Si coupon before annealing (1 cm scale bar). (c) Quartz-tube furnace used for sulfurization at 800 °C for 45 min in flowing Ar/S vapor; the graphite box sits in the uniform-temperature hot zone. (d) Top-view layout of the 1.5 cm × 2 cm coupon divided into a graphene-only region, a MoS2/graphene overlap region, and a MoS2-only region, each patterned with Au contacts (5 mm scale bar).
Figure 1. Two-step fabrication route of centimeter-scale MoS2/graphene heterostructures. (a) Cross-sectional schematic of the stack: few-layer graphene (FLG) on Si/SiO2 is coated with a ∼0.8–1 nm sputtered amorphous MoS2 film that is subsequently crystallized into few-layer (2–4 L) 2H-MoS2 during confined-space sulfurization; Au pads are added later for probing. (b) Photograph of the sealed graphite box loaded with elemental sulfur and the MoS2-coated FLG/Si coupon before annealing (1 cm scale bar). (c) Quartz-tube furnace used for sulfurization at 800 °C for 45 min in flowing Ar/S vapor; the graphite box sits in the uniform-temperature hot zone. (d) Top-view layout of the 1.5 cm × 2 cm coupon divided into a graphene-only region, a MoS2/graphene overlap region, and a MoS2-only region, each patterned with Au contacts (5 mm scale bar).
Nanomaterials 15 01239 g001
Figure 2. Thickness calibration and crystallographic evolution of sputtered amorphous MoS2 films during confined sulfurization. (a) Atomic force-microscopy maps and corresponding step-height profiles for 67 s deposition runs give a linear growth rate of 0.027 nm s−1, enabling precursor thicknesses of 0.8 nm and 1.0 nm (2 micrometer scale bar). (b) XRR curves for each precursor (grey) and its sulfurized counterpart (red): the appearance of pronounced Kiessig fringes after annealing confirms that the amorphous layers densify into continuous, few-nanometer 2H-MoS2 films. (c) Grazing-incidence X-ray diffraction collected in the vertical geometry (incident angle: 0.20°). For both the 0.8 nm and 1.0 nm sulfurized samples, the diffractogram is dominated by the broad amorphous SiO2 band and the Si (100) substrate peak (#1). Additional substrate peaks can also be observed (#2); no distinct MoS2 reflections can be resolved, and this result is attributed to the sub-2 nm film thickness being below the detection limit of the configuration. (d) Horizontal-beam GIXRD further reveals strong ⟨00l⟩ texture in the 1.0 nm film: only the in-plane (100) and (110) reflections are detected, indicating MoS2 sheets lying parallel to the substrate.
Figure 2. Thickness calibration and crystallographic evolution of sputtered amorphous MoS2 films during confined sulfurization. (a) Atomic force-microscopy maps and corresponding step-height profiles for 67 s deposition runs give a linear growth rate of 0.027 nm s−1, enabling precursor thicknesses of 0.8 nm and 1.0 nm (2 micrometer scale bar). (b) XRR curves for each precursor (grey) and its sulfurized counterpart (red): the appearance of pronounced Kiessig fringes after annealing confirms that the amorphous layers densify into continuous, few-nanometer 2H-MoS2 films. (c) Grazing-incidence X-ray diffraction collected in the vertical geometry (incident angle: 0.20°). For both the 0.8 nm and 1.0 nm sulfurized samples, the diffractogram is dominated by the broad amorphous SiO2 band and the Si (100) substrate peak (#1). Additional substrate peaks can also be observed (#2); no distinct MoS2 reflections can be resolved, and this result is attributed to the sub-2 nm film thickness being below the detection limit of the configuration. (d) Horizontal-beam GIXRD further reveals strong ⟨00l⟩ texture in the 1.0 nm film: only the in-plane (100) and (110) reflections are detected, indicating MoS2 sheets lying parallel to the substrate.
Nanomaterials 15 01239 g002
Figure 3. Raman evidence for crystalline few-layer MoS2 and formation of the MoS2/graphene heterostructure. (a) The 532 nm Raman spectra of the 0.8 nm and 1.0 nm sputtered amorphous MoS2 films before and after sulfurization. The crystallized films exhibit the E12g (~385 cm−1) and A1g (~406 cm−1) modes of 2H-MoS2, separated by Δω ≈ 21 cm−1, consistent with 2–4 layers; the amorphous precursors show no MoS2 signatures. (b) Under resonant 633 nm excitation, the sulfurized films display strong second-order bands, LA(M)+TA(M) (~227 cm−1) and 2LA(M) (~460 cm−1), confirming good crystallinity. (c) The 532 nm point spectra on the 0.8 nm coupon demonstrate that graphene G/2D peaks appear only in the graphene-only and overlap zones, while MoS2 E12g/A1g modes dominate in the MoS2-only and overlap zones, verifying spatially selective heterostructure formation. (d) Equivalent three-zone spectra for the 1.0 nm sample show the same behavior with identical Δω, indicating a comparable few-layer thickness. Together, Raman mapping confirms conversion of ultrathin amorphous MoS2 into well-ordered 2H-MoS2 and preservation of an intimate, chemically clean MoS2/graphene interface.
Figure 3. Raman evidence for crystalline few-layer MoS2 and formation of the MoS2/graphene heterostructure. (a) The 532 nm Raman spectra of the 0.8 nm and 1.0 nm sputtered amorphous MoS2 films before and after sulfurization. The crystallized films exhibit the E12g (~385 cm−1) and A1g (~406 cm−1) modes of 2H-MoS2, separated by Δω ≈ 21 cm−1, consistent with 2–4 layers; the amorphous precursors show no MoS2 signatures. (b) Under resonant 633 nm excitation, the sulfurized films display strong second-order bands, LA(M)+TA(M) (~227 cm−1) and 2LA(M) (~460 cm−1), confirming good crystallinity. (c) The 532 nm point spectra on the 0.8 nm coupon demonstrate that graphene G/2D peaks appear only in the graphene-only and overlap zones, while MoS2 E12g/A1g modes dominate in the MoS2-only and overlap zones, verifying spatially selective heterostructure formation. (d) Equivalent three-zone spectra for the 1.0 nm sample show the same behavior with identical Δω, indicating a comparable few-layer thickness. Together, Raman mapping confirms conversion of ultrathin amorphous MoS2 into well-ordered 2H-MoS2 and preservation of an intimate, chemically clean MoS2/graphene interface.
Nanomaterials 15 01239 g003
Figure 4. Surface morphology and stoichiometry of the sulfurized MoS2 films and the MoS2/graphene heterostructure: (a,b) 5 µm × 5 µm non-contact AFM height maps of the 0.8 nm and 1.0 nm precursor films after confined sulfurization. Both samples form continuous layers with areal root-mean-square roughness Sq ≈ 0.81 nm and Sq ≈ 0.85 nm, respectively (1 micrometer scalebar). (c) High-resolution SEM (20 k×) of the MoS2/FLG overlap region (0.8 nm sample) displays a compact nanograined surface composed of 30–50 nm crystallites; no cracks or pin-holes are observed, confirming full areal coverage of the underlying graphene (1 micrometer scalebar). (d) Energy-dispersive X-ray spectrum acquired from the same heterostructure (0–6 keV, logarithmic scale). The dominant Mo Lα and S Kα peaks overlap at 2.293–2.307 keV; deconvolution yields a sulfur-deficient atomic ratio due to the limited interaction volume and peak superposition in EDS. No extraneous elements are detected above background, corroborating the chemical purity of the confined-sulfurization process.
Figure 4. Surface morphology and stoichiometry of the sulfurized MoS2 films and the MoS2/graphene heterostructure: (a,b) 5 µm × 5 µm non-contact AFM height maps of the 0.8 nm and 1.0 nm precursor films after confined sulfurization. Both samples form continuous layers with areal root-mean-square roughness Sq ≈ 0.81 nm and Sq ≈ 0.85 nm, respectively (1 micrometer scalebar). (c) High-resolution SEM (20 k×) of the MoS2/FLG overlap region (0.8 nm sample) displays a compact nanograined surface composed of 30–50 nm crystallites; no cracks or pin-holes are observed, confirming full areal coverage of the underlying graphene (1 micrometer scalebar). (d) Energy-dispersive X-ray spectrum acquired from the same heterostructure (0–6 keV, logarithmic scale). The dominant Mo Lα and S Kα peaks overlap at 2.293–2.307 keV; deconvolution yields a sulfur-deficient atomic ratio due to the limited interaction volume and peak superposition in EDS. No extraneous elements are detected above background, corroborating the chemical purity of the confined-sulfurization process.
Nanomaterials 15 01239 g004
Figure 5. Chemical-state and stoichiometric analysis of confined-sulfurization MoS2 films. (a) High-resolution Mo 3d + S 2s spectra for the 1.0 nm (green) and 0.8 nm (magenta) films after sulfurization. Both are dominated by the Mo4+ doublet of 2H-MoS2 at 228.5/231.6 eV; a minor Mo6+ shoulder (yellow fit component) reflects surface oxidation acquired during air exposure. (b) Corresponding S 2p spectra show the S2− 2p3/2/2p1/2 doublet at 161.6–162.8 eV with negligible high-binding-energy sulphate contribution, confirming complete sulfurization without Mo–O–S bonding.
Figure 5. Chemical-state and stoichiometric analysis of confined-sulfurization MoS2 films. (a) High-resolution Mo 3d + S 2s spectra for the 1.0 nm (green) and 0.8 nm (magenta) films after sulfurization. Both are dominated by the Mo4+ doublet of 2H-MoS2 at 228.5/231.6 eV; a minor Mo6+ shoulder (yellow fit component) reflects surface oxidation acquired during air exposure. (b) Corresponding S 2p spectra show the S2− 2p3/2/2p1/2 doublet at 161.6–162.8 eV with negligible high-binding-energy sulphate contribution, confirming complete sulfurization without Mo–O–S bonding.
Nanomaterials 15 01239 g005
Figure 6. Electrical transport and memristive switching in the directly grown MoS2/graphene heterostructure. (a) Semi-log |I|–V curves recorded between −3 V and +3 V for three in-plane contact configurations. Graphene–graphene (FLG–FLG, black) is nearly ohmic; MoS2–MoS2 (red) remains four to five orders of magnitude less conductive within this bias window; the mixed graphene–MoS2 pair (blue) is intermediate and exhibits a small volatile hysteresis, consistent with reversible Schottky-barrier modulation at the MoS2/graphene junction. The inset shows the Au-pad array used for all measurements. (b) Extending the graphene–MoS2 sweep to ±7 V reveals a non-volatile SET event at ≈+6 V and a partial RESET on the negative branch. The resulting low-bias read current (0.5 V) changes by a factor ≈2.1, confirming true memristive switching localized in the crystallized MoS2 layer. Inset: Microscope image of the probed contact pair. All measurements were performed at room temperature in ambient air with a 10 mA compliance current.
Figure 6. Electrical transport and memristive switching in the directly grown MoS2/graphene heterostructure. (a) Semi-log |I|–V curves recorded between −3 V and +3 V for three in-plane contact configurations. Graphene–graphene (FLG–FLG, black) is nearly ohmic; MoS2–MoS2 (red) remains four to five orders of magnitude less conductive within this bias window; the mixed graphene–MoS2 pair (blue) is intermediate and exhibits a small volatile hysteresis, consistent with reversible Schottky-barrier modulation at the MoS2/graphene junction. The inset shows the Au-pad array used for all measurements. (b) Extending the graphene–MoS2 sweep to ±7 V reveals a non-volatile SET event at ≈+6 V and a partial RESET on the negative branch. The resulting low-bias read current (0.5 V) changes by a factor ≈2.1, confirming true memristive switching localized in the crystallized MoS2 layer. Inset: Microscope image of the probed contact pair. All measurements were performed at room temperature in ambient air with a 10 mA compliance current.
Nanomaterials 15 01239 g006
Figure 7. Conceptual model of vacancy-mediated switching in the lateral MoS2/graphene heterostructure. (a) HRS (OFF): Randomly distributed sulfur vacancies (yellow dots) reside in the MoS2 bulk; the MoS2/graphene interface is separated by a wide Schottky barrier, ΦB, so only a small leakage current, IOFF, flows. (b) LRS (ON): A positive bias of +6 V drives Vs toward the interface (dashed yellow arrow), forming a narrow defect-rich region that electrostatically pins the graphene Fermi level and reduces ΦB. The lowered barrier permits a higher tunnelling current, ION. Removal or reversal of the bias allows for partial vacancy back-diffusion, thereby restoring a higher barrier and resetting the device.
Figure 7. Conceptual model of vacancy-mediated switching in the lateral MoS2/graphene heterostructure. (a) HRS (OFF): Randomly distributed sulfur vacancies (yellow dots) reside in the MoS2 bulk; the MoS2/graphene interface is separated by a wide Schottky barrier, ΦB, so only a small leakage current, IOFF, flows. (b) LRS (ON): A positive bias of +6 V drives Vs toward the interface (dashed yellow arrow), forming a narrow defect-rich region that electrostatically pins the graphene Fermi level and reduces ΦB. The lowered barrier permits a higher tunnelling current, ION. Removal or reversal of the bias allows for partial vacancy back-diffusion, thereby restoring a higher barrier and resetting the device.
Nanomaterials 15 01239 g007
Table 1. High-resolution XPS fitting parameters for 0.8 nm and 1.0 nm MoS2 films. The 1 nm film is close to stoichiometric (S:Mo ≈ 1.95; Mo6+ ≈ 22%), while the thinner 0.8 nm film shows a slight sulfur deficiency (S:Mo ≈ 1.5; Mo6+ ≈ 14%). Overall, the confined-space process yields nearly stoichiometric 2H-MoS2 with only a thin native oxide layer and no detectable contaminants.
Table 1. High-resolution XPS fitting parameters for 0.8 nm and 1.0 nm MoS2 films. The 1 nm film is close to stoichiometric (S:Mo ≈ 1.95; Mo6+ ≈ 22%), while the thinner 0.8 nm film shows a slight sulfur deficiency (S:Mo ≈ 1.5; Mo6+ ≈ 14%). Overall, the confined-space process yields nearly stoichiometric 2H-MoS2 with only a thin native oxide layer and no detectable contaminants.
1 nm MoS2
Sulfurized
0.8 nm MoS2
Sulfurized
S:Mo1.951.5
Mo6+ (%)2214
B.E. Mo 3d (eV)229228.8
B.E. S 2p (eV)161.7161.6
Table 2. Benchmark of lateral MoS2/graphene memristors.
Table 2. Benchmark of lateral MoS2/graphene memristors.
Device ArchitecturetMoS2 (nm)VSET/VRESET (V)ON/OFF RatioMechanismRef.
Ti/Au/monolayer MoS2/Ti/Au≈0.7 +6/−5≈2.0Schottky-barrier narrowing by S-vacancy redistribution[16]
TiN/O-doped 3 L MoS2/TiN≈1.8+5.4/−4.8≈2–3Oxygen-induced trap filling/interface dipole[17]
Au/4 L MoS2/graphene/Au≈2 +6/−6≈2.1Interface vacancy drift/barrier modulationthis work
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mihai, C.; Simandan, I.-D.; Sava, F.; Tite, T.; Bocirnea, A.; Vaduva, M.; Zaki, M.Y.; Baibarac, M.; Velea, A. Fabrication of High-Quality MoS2/Graphene Lateral Heterostructure Memristors. Nanomaterials 2025, 15, 1239. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15161239

AMA Style

Mihai C, Simandan I-D, Sava F, Tite T, Bocirnea A, Vaduva M, Zaki MY, Baibarac M, Velea A. Fabrication of High-Quality MoS2/Graphene Lateral Heterostructure Memristors. Nanomaterials. 2025; 15(16):1239. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15161239

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mihai, Claudia, Iosif-Daniel Simandan, Florinel Sava, Teddy Tite, Amelia Bocirnea, Mirela Vaduva, Mohamed Yassine Zaki, Mihaela Baibarac, and Alin Velea. 2025. "Fabrication of High-Quality MoS2/Graphene Lateral Heterostructure Memristors" Nanomaterials 15, no. 16: 1239. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15161239

APA Style

Mihai, C., Simandan, I.-D., Sava, F., Tite, T., Bocirnea, A., Vaduva, M., Zaki, M. Y., Baibarac, M., & Velea, A. (2025). Fabrication of High-Quality MoS2/Graphene Lateral Heterostructure Memristors. Nanomaterials, 15(16), 1239. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15161239

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop