Next Article in Journal
Effects of Curing Temperature on Bending Durability of Inkjet-Printed Flexible Silver Electrode
Next Article in Special Issue
Low-Temperature Synthesis of Monolithic Titanium Carbide/Carbon Composite Aerogel
Previous Article in Journal
Sensitive and In Situ Hemoglobin Detection Based on a Graphene Oxide Functionalized Microfiber
Previous Article in Special Issue
Creation of Curved Nanostructures Using Soft-Materials-Derived Lithography
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 10
Issue 12
10.3390/nano10122462
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Improved Pulse-Controlled Conductance Adjustment in Trilayer Resistors by Suppressing Current Overshoot

by
Hojeong Ryu
and
Sungjun Kim
*
Division of Electronics and Electrical Engineering, Dongguk University, Seoul 04620, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2020, 10(12), 2462; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10122462
Submission received: 10 November 2020 / Revised: 6 December 2020 / Accepted: 8 December 2020 / Published: 9 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanotechnologies and Nanomaterials: Selected Papers from CCMR)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

In this work, we demonstrate the enhanced synaptic behaviors in trilayer dielectrics (HfO2/Si3N4/SiO2) on highly doped n-type silicon substrate. First, the three dielectric layers were subjected to material and chemical analyses and thoroughly investigated via transmission electron microscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. The resistive switching and synaptic behaviors were improved by inserting a Si3N4 layer between the HfO2 and SiO2 layers. The electric field within SiO2 was mitigated, thus reducing the current overshoot in the trilayer device. The reset current was considerably reduced in the trilayer device compared to the bilayer device without a Si3N4 layer. Moreover, the nonlinear characteristics in the low-resistance state are helpful for implementing high-density memory. The higher array size in the trilayer device was verified by cross-point array simulation. Finally, the multiple conductance adjustment was demonstrated in the trilayer device by controlling the gradual set and reset switching behavior.

1. Introduction

Resistive switching memory is very attractive for a wide range of applications due to its various resistive switching characteristics stemming from a number of resistive switching materials by easily tunable resistive switching parameters such as on-resistance, off-resistance, and operation voltage [1,2,3,4,5]. Moreover, its simple structure, such as metal–insulator–metal (MIM) with 4F2 (F is feature size), can be scaled down via a lithography process [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Further, the multiple resistance states triggered by electrical pulses can be used for high-density memory. Finally, the good retention properties, such as NAND flash and high endurance, provide an edge over other competing memory products. The types of resistive switching should be characterized depending on the possible applications, such as in storage class memory, neuromorphic devices, and logic devices. Among them, a neuromorphic device using resistive switching memory is attracting considerable attention [7,8,9,10]. To meet the needs of efficient data processing in the era of big data, neuromorphic computing provides a major breakthrough that can replace the existing Von Neumann computing. In particular, neuromorphic systems are specialized in data processing, such as complex pattern recognition. Moreover, they take an energy-efficient approach by carrying out data processing in a parallel manner. In a neuromorphic system, the conductance of the resistive switching memory cell placed on a cross-point array has multiple states and can be updated and controlled by the input pulse from the neuron circuit. The conductance control of resistive switching is similar to the synaptic weight adjustment in biological synapses in the human nervous system.
Resistive switching and artificial synaptic behaviors are observed in many insulators, such as oxide [11,12,13], nitride [13,14,15], organic materials [16], and 2D materials [17]. Among them, metal–oxide-based resistive switching memories such as HfO2 have proven to have the best resistive switching performances in terms of, e.g., endurance, retention, and variability. Excellent resistive switching has been reported when using metal bottom electrodes [18,19]. HfO2-based resistive switching memory with ITO electrode can also be used for flexible and transparent electronic devices [20]. On the other hand, the HfO2-based resistive memory with a silicon bottom electrode has not yet been reported as superior to the metal bottom electrode. However, the metal–oxide–semiconductor structure has other advantages, such as self-rectification and low-power operation. The most effective way to enhance resistive switching is to design multiple dielectric stacks [21]. The use of an oxygen reservoir, such as a TiOx layer, is popular in metal–oxide-based resistive switching memory. Abundant oxygen vacancies are created in the main resistor for resistive switching. A tunnel barrier, such as SiO2 and Al2O3, with a large band gap, can enhance the resistive switching properties by reducing the operation current and increasing the nonlinearity of the I–V curve in the low-resistance state (LRS) [22,23]. The SiO2 layer can be easily formed when using silicon substrate as the bottom electrode and different methods such as native oxide, thermal oxide, and chemical vapor deposition (CVD). Another advantage of inserting the tunnel barrier with a high band gap is a reduction in the LRS current [21,22]. To employ the advantageous tunnel barrier in resistive switching, the insulating property of the SiO2 layer is maintained after the forming and set processes. If the excess electric field is applied on the tunnel barrier with a high compliance current, breakdown of the tunnel barrier can occur. Therefore, the use of a careful device stack design is necessary to ensure a stable tunnel barrier layer; for example, the thicknesses of the tunnel barrier and the main resistor are important. In addition, the dielectric constant should be considered to properly distribute the electric field throughout multiple dielectric layers.
In this work, we fabricated a trilayer (HfO2/Si3N4/SiO2) resistive switching memory device and demonstrated low current switching by suppressing the current overshoot and nonlinear I–V curves in the LRS. The trilayered dielectric stacks were confirmed via high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) before electrical characterization. Through a comparative study with a control group without a Si3N4 layer, it was verified that the Si3N4 layer can relieve the concentration of the electric field in SiO2. Finally, we demonstrated the improved synaptic behaviors by achieving gradual conductance control in the trilayer structure compared to the device without a Si3N4 layer.

2. Materials and Methods

The Ni/HfO2/Si3N4/SiO2/Si device was prepared as follows: The ion implantation was conducted in the Si substrate to increase the conductivity on the single crystalline Si surface as the bottom electrode. Phosphorus (P) as an impurity was used to form an n-type Si bottom electrode, where the dose and energy were 5 × 1015 cm−2 and 40 keV, respectively. The Si lattice damage caused by ion implantation was cured by the annealing process. Next, a 2.5-nm-thick SiO2 film was deposited via low-pressure chemical vapor deposition (LPCVD) by reacting SiH2Cl2 (40 sccm) and N2O (160 sccm) at 785 °C after removing native oxide through HF cleaning. Then, a 3.5-nm-thick Si3N4 layer was deposited via LPCVD by reacting SiH2Cl2 (30 sccm) and NH3 (100 sccm) at 785 °C. After that, a 3.5-nm-thick HfO2 layer was deposited by atomic layer deposition (ALD) system by reacting tetrakis (ethylmethylamino) hafnium (TEMAH) and ozone (O3) at 300 °C. Finally, a 100-nm-thick Ni top electrode was deposited by a thermal evaporator and patterned by a shadow mask containing circular patterns with a diameter of 100 μm. A Ni/HfO2/SiO2/Si device was prepared as a control device in the same way, except for the Si3N4 layer.
The electrical properties were characterized both in DC mode using a Keithley 4200-SCS semiconductor parameter analyzer (Keithley Instrumnets, Cleveland, OH, USA) and in pulse mode using a 4225-PMU ultrafast module (Keithley Instrumnets, Cleveland, OH, USA) During the measurements, a bias voltage and pulse were applied to the Ni top electrode, while the Si bottom electrode was grounded. XPS depth analysis was conducted with a Nexsa (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with a Microfocus monochromatic X-ray source (Al-Kα (1486.6 eV)), a sputter source (Ar+), an ion energy of 1 kV, and a beam size of 100 µm × 100 µm.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 1a,b respectively shows the schematics and a TEM image of the Ni/HfO2/Si3N4/SiO2/Si device. Single crystalline Si substrate and amorphous HfO2, Si3N4, and SiO2 layers could be observed in the TEM image. In addition, the TEM image provides information about the exact film thicknesses of HfO2 (3.5 nm), Si3N4 (3.5 nm), and SiO2 (2.5 nm). The energy-dispersive X-ray spectra (EDS) line scan was obtained through scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) and is shown in Figure S1. Next, the XPS depth profile of HfO2/Si3N4/SiO2/Si was investigated to determine the elements in each layer. Figure 1c shows the XPS spectra Hf 4f of HfO2 as the first dielectric layer [24]; Hf 4f is typically composed of a 4f 5/2 and 4f 7/2 spin–orbit doublet, which are respectively centered at 20 and 18.5 eV. This result is consistent with existing literature about HfO2 on a Si substrate [24]. Figure 1d shows the Si 2p spectra for the Si3N4 layer, SiO2 layer, and Si substrate. The peak intensity that is located at about 99.5 eV is higher at the deeper etching level (level 11) than it is at level 7. This indicates that the Si substrate is more exposed by X-ray beams at the deeper etching level (level 11) [21]. Moreover, the peak point at etch level 11 is shifted to the right compared to that at etch level 7, indicating that the Si–O bond located at 103.5 eV is increased at level 11 [25]. Figure 1e shows the N 1s spectra at level 7 and level 11, where the peak is centered at about 398 eV [26]. The peak intensity at level 11 is much weaker than that at level 7. This result is consistent with the Si 2p result shown in Figure 1d.
Figure 2a,b shows the I–V characteristics of the Ni/HfO2/SiO2/Si and Ni/HfO2/Si3N4/SiO2/Si devices. For a fair comparison, the compliance current (CC) of 5 μA is applied to both devices. The initial cells are activated with the positive bias DC sweep. The current is significantly increased during the reverse sweep, which indicates that soft breakdown occurs within the dielectrics. The CC can protect the device from permanent breakdown. Subsequently, the reset process is conducted by the negative bias sweep, causing the state of the device to be changed to the high-resistance state (HRS). This process can be explained by the rupture of the conducting path in dielectrics. Then, the set process follows to make the state of device be the LRS again. The HRS and LRS of the device can be repeatedly switched in the repetitive set and reset process. It should be noted that high current (~10 mA) flows within the Ni/HfO2/SiO2/Si device in the LRS. The current is very high despite the fact that 5 μA is applied on the Ni/HfO2/SiO2/Si device during the forward and reverse sweep in the LRS under the positive bias. Subsequently, the high LRS current without CC in a negative bias is the real current level. This suggests that current overshoot occurs during the set process, meaning that the LRS current cannot be tightly controlled by CC. An abrupt transition is observed during the reset process, indicating that the conducting path is ruptured at once. The I–V characteristics of the Ni/HfO2/Si3N4/SiO2/Si device are substantially different from those of the Ni/HfO2/SiO2/Si device, as shown in Figure 2b. The LRS current in a negative region is lower than the CC of 5 μA. This implies that the current overshoot is suppressed during the set process at a positive region. The bipolar resistive switching is driven by the temperature and electric field [27,28,29,30]. The Ni/HfO2/SiO2/Si device shows abrupt reset with high current, indicating that Joule heating is the dominant mechanism of the reset process. On the other hand, the electric field may be more important for the Ni/HfO2/Si3N4/SiO2/Si device considering the switching at low current.
Figure 2c,d shows the cycling trend of the Ni/HfO2/SiO2/Si and Ni/HfO2/Si3N4/SiO2/Si devices, respectively. Time series statistical analysis could provide the indirect information of filament evolution [31,32]. Both HRS and LRS are stable except for the initial few points during the cycling for the Ni/HfO2/SiO2/Si device. This indicates that the large size of conducting filament could be uniformly formed and ruptured. On the other hand, the read current of the Ni/HfO2/Si3N4/SiO2/Si device has larger variation during the cycling, and the read current in the HRS is increased. The larger variation is probably due to the fact that the filaments are formed and ruptured in multiple layers (HfO2/Si3N4/SiO2), and these formations and ruptures would be quite random processes spatially inside the insulators.
Figure 3a shows the statistical distribution of the Ni/HfO2/SiO2/Si and Ni/HfO2/Si3N4/SiO2/Si devices in the LRS and HRS. The LRS resistance of the Ni/HfO2/Si3N4/SiO2/Si device is much higher than that of the Ni/HfO2/SiO2/Si device. However, the variations of the LRS and HRS of the Ni/HfO2/Si3N4/SiO2/Si device are worsened. Figure 3b shows the ratio between reset current (IRESET) and CC. From this ratio, we can obtain information on how much CC suppresses the overshoot current during the set process. IRESET is rather smaller than CC in the Ni/HfO2/Si3N4/SiO2/Si device. However, the IRESET/ICC ratio of the Ni/HfO2/Si3N4/SiO2/Si device is more than 1000. Other advantages of the Ni/HfO2/Si3N4/SiO2/Si device are its high nonlinear I–V characteristic and its low-current operation. The nonlinearity is defined as the ratio between the current at read voltage (VREAD) and the current at half read voltage (1/2·VREAD) for the half bias scheme in the cross-point array (Figure S2). Further, the nonlinearity is defined as the ratio between the current at VREAD and the current at 1/3·VREAD for the 1/3 read scheme. The LRS resistance is the main leakage path in the cross-point array structure when reading the target cell with the HRS. Therefore, the current at 1/2·VREAD or the current at 1/3·VREAD should be suppressed to reduce crosstalk among the cells. Figure 3c shows the nonlinearity of both devices when applying the 1/2 read scheme and the 1/3 read scheme. The nonlinearities of the Ni/HfO2/SiO2/Si device in the LRS are about 2 and 3 for the 1/2 read scheme and the 1/3 read scheme, respectively. This indicates that the LRS follows Ohmic conduction with a slope of 2. The nonlinearity of the Ni/HfO2/Si3N4/SiO2/Si device in the LRS is substantially higher due to its nonlinear I–V characteristics.
Figure 4 shows the read margin as a function of the number of word lines for the Ni/HfO2/SiO2/Si and Ni/HfO2/Si3N4/SiO2/Si devices. Here, the 1/2 read scheme and the 1/3 read scheme are applied to a virtual cross-point array without line resistance. The detailed array read schemes are well known in the literature, and we discuss in detail equation and the scheme in Figure S3. The Ni/HfO2/Si3N4/SiO2/Si device shows higher read margin compared to the Ni/HfO2/SiO2/Si device. This is due to the fact that Ni/HfO2/Si3N4/SiO2/Si has higher LRS resistance and nonlinear I–V curves in the LRS. The read margin at the 1/3 read scheme is also higher than that of the 1/2 read scheme.
The conducting path would be formed in the SiO2 layer during the set process for the Ni/HfO2/Si3N4/SiO2/Si device. The electric field is concentrated within the SiO2 layer with consideration of the dielectric constants (HfO2: ~20 and SiO2: ~4). Therefore, high current cannot be avoided in the LRS after the set process. On the other hand, the overshoot current was mitigated in the Ni/HfO2/Si3N4/SiO2/Si device during the set process. This can be explained by the dispersion of the focused electric field of the SiO2 layer due to the Si3N4 layer. The dielectric constant of the Si3N4 layer (Si3N4: ~7) is slightly higher than that of SiO2 and lower than that of HfO2. Therefore, a Si3N4 layer between the HfO2 layer and the SiO2 layer is a good buffer layer to reduce the current overshoot.
Next, we compared the tendency of conductance change as a function of identical pulse during the set and reset process. Figure 5a shows the conductance changes of the Ni/HfO2/SiO2/Si device for potentiation (set process) and depression (reset process), respectively. The pulse amplitude voltages with a pulse width of 450 µs are 6 V and −3.5 V for potentiation and depression, respectively. The conductance values are extracted from the middle point of read pulse (1 V and 450 µs). For potentiation, the conductance value increases abruptly in response to the 18th pulse. The depression curve shows several fluctuations after the first decrease in conductance. Such randomness and abrupt conductance change are not suitable for a hardware-based neuromorphic synaptic device. On the other hand, the conductance values in the Ni/HfO2/Si3N4/SiO2/Si device are gradually controlled by the potentiation and depression pulses (Figure 5b). The voltages of the set pulse and reset pulse are 7 and −4.5 V, respectively, and the pulse width is 450 µs. Further, the read pulse (1 V and 450 µs) is inserted between set pulses or reset pulses to obtain the conductance value. It should be noted that a gradual conductance update is possible when the same pulse is repeatedly applied on the device for potentiation and depression. Moreover, the conductance value of the Ni/HfO2/Si3N4/SiO2/Si device is substantially lower than that of the Ni/HfO2/SiO2/Si device. Therefore, the improved synaptic properties, such as the low energy and multiple conductance, of the Ni/HfO2/Si3N4/SiO2/Si device are beneficial for synaptic applications. The conductance update method of the Ni/HfO2/Si3N4/SiO2/Si device is suitable for offline learning. To apply it to online learning that provides information by reading conductance values in real time, improvement in variation will be required [33].

4. Conclusions

In summary, we fabricated a CMOS-compatible trilayer device (Ni/HfO2/Si3N4/SiO2/Si) and characterized its resistive and synaptic characteristics. The TEM and XPS provide the exact dielectric thickness and chemical information of the trilayer device. The Si3N4 layer could alleviate the concentrated electric field into the SiO2 layer in the trilayer design, so the conducting paths are not formed in all dielectrics in the LRS. This property can reduce reset current and provide a nonlinear I–V curve in the LRS. The high nonlinearity in the trilayer device can enlarge the array size in the cross-point array architecture. Finally, we demonstrated that gradual set and reset switching in a trilayer device can be highly suitable for emulating the synaptic behavior of a biological synapse in the human nervous system by controlling multiple conductance.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/10/12/2462/s1, Figure S1: The STEM image and EDS line scan of Ni/HfO2/Si3N4/SiO2/Si. Figure S2: Definition of nonlinearity of I–V in the LRS. Figure S3: Read operation scheme in virtual cross-point array structure.

Author Contributions

H.R. conducted the electrical measurements and wrote the manuscript. S.K. designed the experiment concept and supervised the study. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported in part by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), grant funded by the Korean government (MSIP) under Grant 2018R1C1B5046454.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lanza, M.; Wong, H.-S.P.; Pop, E.; Ielmini, D.; Strukov, D.; Regan, B.C.; Larcher, L.; Villena, M.A.; Yang, J.J.; Goux, L.; et al. Recommended Methods to Study Resistive Switching Devices. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2018, 5, 1800143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Linn, E.; Rosezin, R.; Kügeler, C.; Waser, R. Complementary resistive switches for passive nanocrossbar memories. Nat. Mater. 2010, 9, 403–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kim, S.; Jung, S.; Kim, M.-H.; Chen, Y.-C.; Chang, T.-C.; Ryoo, K.-C.; Cho, S.; Lee, J.-H.; Park, B.-G. Scaling Effect on Silicon Nitride Memristor with Highly Doped Si Substrate. Small 2018, 14, 1704062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhou, F.; Chang, Y.F.; Fowler, B.; Byun, K.; Lee, J.C. Stabilization of multiple resistance levels by current-sweep in SiOx-based resistive switching memory. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015, 106, 063508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pan, F.; Gao, S.; Chen, C.; Song, C.; Zeng, F. Recent progress in resistive random access memories: Materials, switching mechanisms, and performance. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2014, 83, 1–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Maikap, S.; Banergee, W. In Quest of Nonfilamentary Switching: A Synergistic Approach of Dual Nanostructure Engineering to Improve the Variability and Reliability of Resistive Random-Access-Memory Devices. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2020, 6, 2000209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mikhaylov, A.; Pimashkin, A.; Pigareva, Y.; Gerasimova, S.; Gryaznov, E.; Shchanikov, S.; Zuev, A.; Talanov, M.; Lavrov, I.; Demin, V.; et al. Neurohybrid Memristive CMOS-Integrated Systems for Biosensors and Neuroprosthetics. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2020, 14, 358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Kuzum, D.; Yu, S.; Wong, H.-S.P. Synaptic electronics: Materials, devices and applications. Nanotechnology 2013, 24, 382001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Graves, C.E.; Li, C.; Sheng, X.; Miller, D.; Ignowski, J.; Kiyama, L.; Strachan, J.P. In-Memory Computing with Memristor Content Addressable Memories for Pattern Matching. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 2003437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Xia, Q.; Yang, J.J. Memristive crossbar arrays for brain-inspired computing. Nat. Mater. 2019, 18, 309–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ryu, H.; Kim, S. Pseudo-Interface Switching of a Two-Terminal TaOx/HfO2 Synaptic Device for Neuromorphic Applications. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Choi, J.; Kim, S. Nonlinear Characteristics of Complementary Resistive Switching in HfAlOx-Based Memristor for High-Density Cross-Point Array Structure. Coatings 2020, 10, 765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ryu, H.; Kim, S. Voltage Amplitude-Controlled Synaptic Plasticity from Complementary Resistive Switching in Alloying HfOx with AlOx-Based RRAM. Metals 2020, 11, 1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Cho, S.; Kim, S. Emulation of Biological Synapse Characteristics from Cu/AlN/TiN Conductive Bridge Random Access Memory. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kim, S.; Kim, H.; Jung, S.; Kim, M.H.; Lee, S.; Cho, S.; Park, B.G. Tuning resistive switching parameters in Si3N4-based RRAM for three-dimensional vertical resistive memory applications. J. Alloy. Compd. 2016, 663, 419–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Emelyanov, A.V.; Nikiruy, K.E.; Serenko, A.V.; Sitnikov, A.V.; Presnyakov, M.Y.; Rybka, R.B.; Sboev, A.G.; Rylkov, V.V.; Kashkarov, P.K.; Kovalchuk, M.V.; et al. Self-adaptive STDP-based learning of a spiking neuron with nanocomposite memristive weights. Nanotechnology 2020, 31, 045201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, D.; Wu, B.; Zhu, X.; Wang, J.; Ryu, B.; Lu, W.D.; Liang, X. MoS2 Memristors Exhibiting Variable Switching Characteristics toward Biorealistic Synaptic Emulation. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 9240–9252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chand, U.; Alawein, M.; Fariborzi, H. Enhancement of Endurance in HfO2-Based CBRAM Device by Introduction of a TaN diffusion Blocking Layer. ECS Trans. 2017, 77, 1971–1976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chand, U.; Huang, K.C.; Huang, C.Y.; Ho, C.H.; Lin, C.H.; Tseng, T.Y. Investigation of thermal stability and reliability of HfO2 based resistive random access memory devices with cross-bar structure. J. Appl. Phys. 2015, 117, 184105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mahata, C.; Lee, C.; An, Y.; Kim, M.H.; Bang, S.; Kim, C.S.; Ryu, J.H.; Kim, S.; Kim, H.; Park, B.G. Resistive switching and synaptic behaviors of an HfO2/Al2O3 stack on ITO for neuromorphic systems. J. Alloy. Compd. 2020, 826, 154434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mikhaylov, A.; Belov, A.; Korolev, D.; Antonov, I.; Kotomina, V.; Kotina, A.; Gryaznov, E.; Sharapov, A.; Koryazhkina, M.; Kryukov, R.; et al. Multilayer Metal-Oxide Memristive Device with Stabilized Resistive Switching. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2020, 5, 1900607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kim, S.; Park, B.G. Nonlinear and multilevel resistive switching memory in Ni/Si3N4/Al2O3/TiN structures. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2016, 108, 212103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kim, M.H.; Kim, S.; Bang, S.; Kim, T.H.; Lee, D.K.; Cho, S.; Park, B.G. Uniformity Improvement of SiNx-Based Resistive Switching Memory by Suppressed Internal Overshoot Current. IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. 2018, 17, 824–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Jung, R. Fermi-Level Pinning at the Poly-Si/HfO2 Interface. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 2009, 55, 2501–2504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bommali, R.K.; Singh, S.P.; Prakash, G.V.; Ghosh, S.; Srivastava, P. Growth and tailoring of physical properties of Si quantum dots in a-SiNx:H matrix. Energy Procedia 2013, 41, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kim, T.; Koka, S.; Surthi, S.; Zhuang, K. Direct Impact of Chemical Bonding of Oxynitride on Boron Penetration and Electrical Oxide Hardening for Nanoscale Flash Memory. IEEE Electron. Dev. Lett. 2013, 34, 405–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ielemini, D. Modeling the Universal Set/Reset Characteristics of Bipolar RRAM by Field- and Temperature-Driven Filament Growth. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2011, 58, 4309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Aldana, S.; García-Fernández, P.; Rodríguez-Fernández, A.; Romero-Zaliz, R.; González, M.B.; Jiménez-Molinos, F.; Campabadal, F.; Gómez-Campos, F.; Roldán, J.B. A 3D kinetic Monte Carlo simulation study of resistive switching processes in Ni/HfO2/Si-n+-based RRAMs. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2017, 50, 335103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Vandelli, L.; Padovani, A.; Larcher, L.; Bersuker, G. Microscopic Modeling of Electrical Stress-Induced Breakdown in Poly-Crystalline Hafnium Oxide Dielectrics. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2013, 60, 1754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Guy, J.; Molas, G.; Blaise, P.; Bernard, M.; Roule, A.; Carval, G.L.; Delaye, V.; Toffoli, A.; Ghibaudo, G.; Clermidy, F.; et al. Investigation of Forming, SET, and Data Retention of Conductive-Bridge Random-Access Memory for Stack Optimization. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2015, 62, 3482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Roldán, J.B.; Alonso, F.J.; Aguilera, A.M.; Maldonado, D.; Lanza, M. Time series statistical analysis: A powerful tool to evaluate the variability of resistive switching memories. J. Appl. Phys. 2019, 125, 174504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Miranda, E.; Mehonic, A.; Ng, W.H.; Kenyon, A.J. Simulation of Cycle-to-Cycle Instabilities in SiOx-Based ReRAM Devices Using a Self-Correlated Process With Long-Term Variation. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2019, 40, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kim, C.-H.; Lim, S.; Woo, S.Y.; Kang, W.M.; Seo, Y.-T.; Lee, S.T.; Lee, S.; Kwon, D.; Oh, S.; Noh, Y. Emerging memory technologies for neuromorphic computing. Nanotechnology 2018, 30, 032001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nanomaterials 10 02462 g001
Figure 1. Device configuration and material analysis of the Ni/HfO2/Si3N4/SiO2/Si device. (a) Schematic drawing of the device stack; (b) TEM image; (c) XPS Hf 4f spectra at etch level 3; (d) XPS Si 2p spectra at etch levels 7 and 11; and (e) XPS N 1s spectra at etch levels 7 and 11.
Figure 1. Device configuration and material analysis of the Ni/HfO2/Si3N4/SiO2/Si device. (a) Schematic drawing of the device stack; (b) TEM image; (c) XPS Hf 4f spectra at etch level 3; (d) XPS Si 2p spectra at etch levels 7 and 11; and (e) XPS N 1s spectra at etch levels 7 and 11.
Nanomaterials 10 02462 g001
Nanomaterials 10 02462 g002
Figure 2. I–V characteristics of the (a) Ni/HfO2/SiO2/Si device and (b) Ni/HfO2/Si3N4/SiO2/Si device including forming, set, and reset processes; cycling data of I–V characteristics of (c) Ni/HfO2/SiO2/Si device and (d) Ni/HfO2/Si3N4/SiO2/Si device.
Figure 2. I–V characteristics of the (a) Ni/HfO2/SiO2/Si device and (b) Ni/HfO2/Si3N4/SiO2/Si device including forming, set, and reset processes; cycling data of I–V characteristics of (c) Ni/HfO2/SiO2/Si device and (d) Ni/HfO2/Si3N4/SiO2/Si device.
Nanomaterials 10 02462 g002
Nanomaterials 10 02462 g003
Figure 3. Statistical distributions of (a) high-resistance state (HRS) and low-resistance state (LRS) resistance, (b) IRESET/ICC, and (c) nonlinearity for Ni/HfO2/SiO2/Si and Ni/HfO2/Si3N4/SiO2/Si devices.
Figure 3. Statistical distributions of (a) high-resistance state (HRS) and low-resistance state (LRS) resistance, (b) IRESET/ICC, and (c) nonlinearity for Ni/HfO2/SiO2/Si and Ni/HfO2/Si3N4/SiO2/Si devices.
Nanomaterials 10 02462 g003
Nanomaterials 10 02462 g004
Figure 4. Read margin of Ni/HfO2/SiO2/Si and Ni/HfO2/Si3N4/SiO2/Si devices when applying (a) 1/2 read scheme and (b) 1/3 read scheme in cross-point array.
Figure 4. Read margin of Ni/HfO2/SiO2/Si and Ni/HfO2/Si3N4/SiO2/Si devices when applying (a) 1/2 read scheme and (b) 1/3 read scheme in cross-point array.
Nanomaterials 10 02462 g004
Nanomaterials 10 02462 g005
Figure 5. Potentiation and depression characteristics for (a,b) Ni/HfO2/SiO2/Si device and (c,d) Ni/HfO2/Si3N4/SiO2/Si device.
Figure 5. Potentiation and depression characteristics for (a,b) Ni/HfO2/SiO2/Si device and (c,d) Ni/HfO2/Si3N4/SiO2/Si device.
Nanomaterials 10 02462 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ryu, H.; Kim, S. Improved Pulse-Controlled Conductance Adjustment in Trilayer Resistors by Suppressing Current Overshoot. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 2462. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10122462

AMA Style

Ryu H, Kim S. Improved Pulse-Controlled Conductance Adjustment in Trilayer Resistors by Suppressing Current Overshoot. Nanomaterials. 2020; 10(12):2462. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10122462

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ryu, Hojeong, and Sungjun Kim. 2020. "Improved Pulse-Controlled Conductance Adjustment in Trilayer Resistors by Suppressing Current Overshoot" Nanomaterials 10, no. 12: 2462. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10122462

APA Style

Ryu, H., & Kim, S. (2020). Improved Pulse-Controlled Conductance Adjustment in Trilayer Resistors by Suppressing Current Overshoot. Nanomaterials, 10(12), 2462. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10122462

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop