Next Article in Journal
Fabrication of Porous Bone Scaffolds Using Alginate and Bioactive Glass
Next Article in Special Issue
The Application of 29Si NMR Spectroscopy to the Analysis of Calcium Silicate-Based Cement using Biodentine™ as an Example
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Calcium Precursor on the Bioactivity and Biocompatibility of Sol-Gel-Derived Glasses
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of a New Bioceramic Material on Human Apical Papilla Cells
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Six-Month Color Stability Assessment of Two Calcium Silicate-Based Cements Used in Regenerative Endodontic Procedures

1
Institute of Endodontics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3000-075 Coimbra, Portugal
2
Institute of Oral Implantology and Prosthodontics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3000-075 Coimbra, Portugal
3
Dentistry Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3000-075 Coimbra, Portugal
4
Institute of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3000-075 Coimbra, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Funct. Biomater. 2019, 10(1), 14; https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb10010014
Submission received: 13 January 2019 / Revised: 18 February 2019 / Accepted: 18 February 2019 / Published: 28 February 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Endodontic Biomaterials)

Abstract

:
Aim: The purpose of the present study is to assess the color stability of two calcium silicate-based cements (CSCs) used in regenerative endodontic procedures (REPs). Methods: A total of 40 acrylic single-rooted transparent teeth, with immature apex, were used. Root canals were filled up to 3 mm below the level of the cementoenamel junction, with either saline solution (Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA)/saline and Biodentine/saline) or blood (MTA/blood and Biodentine/blood). Subsequently, ProRoot MTA® or BiodentineTM was placed in the root canal to create a cervical barrier. Color measurement was carried out at four different evaluation periods (3 h, 72 h, 7 days, and 6 months). Shade analysis within the L* a* b* color space was performed and color variation (∆E) calculated. The significance level for statistical analysis was set at p < 0.05. Results: The four groups showed a significant decrease in L* values over time. The ΔE value increased over time for all groups but was not statistically significant for the Biodentine/blood group. Two-way ANOVA showed no interaction between the CSC and treatment (contact with saline solution or blood). CSC used was the factor responsible for ΔE over time, inducing statistically significant color variations from T3H to T7D (p = 0.04) and T3H to T6M (p < 0.01). After 6 months, MTA/saline had 5.08 (p = 0.001) higher ΔE than Biodentine/Saline and the MTA/blood had 3.65 (p = 0.009) higher than Biodentine/blood. Conclusions: After 6 months, regardless of blood exposure, Biodentine exhibits superior color stability compared to MTA. Biodentine might be a suitable alternative to MTA as a cervical barrier material in REPs.

1. Introduction

Tooth discoloration is a major esthetic concern for both patient and dental practitioners, especially when anterior teeth are involved [1,2]. Tooth staining exhibits a multifactorial etiology, with localized intrinsic discoloration appearing to be, in some clinical situations, related to both intra and post-endodontic procedures [2].
Concerning the clinical management of immature permanent teeth with pulp necrosis apexification induces an apical barrier formation, formerly with a multiple-visit calcium hydroxide application [3] but more recently with a mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) apical plug placement [4]. High success rates were reported regarding the aforementioned apical MTA barrier technique [5]. However, considering the well-known drawbacks inherent to the conventional approach, regenerative endodontic procedures (REPs) have been presented as a viable biologically based treatment alternative [6,7], aiming to promote the continuation of root development in both length and width of the root walls, with the ultimate goal of reestablishing a positive pulp vitality test response [8,9,10,11]. According to the current American Association of Endodontists (AAE) Clinical Considerations for a Regenerative Procedure, following a meticulous disinfection protocol, a scaffold is created/positioned within the root canal space [10]. Despite its limitations and the existence of several alternatives, such as platelet-rich plasma, platelet-rich fibrin, and soluble collagen, a blood clot creation is advised by the AAE [10] and has become traditionally used as a scaffold, with clinical studies highlighting the success of this approach [12]. Subsequently, cervical sealing is performed by placing a 3–4 mm CSC layer in the coronal portion of the root canal, over the scaffold [10,11].
Tooth discoloration following REPs is well described in the literature [13]. The AAE recommends clinicians to provide informed consent that aims to advise the patient of the possible postoperative adverse effects, including tooth staining [10]. This undesirable outcome arises from the use of specific endodontic materials with discoloration potential in regenerative therapy [14]. Since MTA discoloration potential has been stated as a main shortcoming, an alternative bioactive cement, exhibiting similar clinical applications and a shorter setting time (12 min), was introduced—Biodentine (Septodont, Saint-Maur-des-Fossés Cedex, France) [15]. This bioceramic material contains zirconium oxide, rather than bismuth oxide that is found in MTA, to provide radiopacity, and previous studies report superior color stability compared to ProRoot MTA® (Dentsply Tulsa Dental, Johnson City, TN, USA) [16,17]. Moreover, it is noteworthy that the presence of blood during calcium silicate-based cement (CSC) setting can exacerbate both MTA and Biodentine color variation over time [18,19,20] and, therefore, impair the esthetic outcome following REPs.
The current study detaches itself from a wide span of others as it considers the multifactorial tooth discoloration process and isolates a single variable, blood exposure influence, to clearly assess its role. To increase reproducibility and external validity, an acrylic immature tooth model was used to simulate the clinical situation of a permanent tooth eligible for being used in regenerative endodontic procedures.
The purpose of the present in vitro study was to assess the color stability of two CSCs (ProRoot MTA® and Biodentine) used in regenerative therapy, in the presence and absence of blood and at four different timings, using an experimental model for REPs simulation.
The experimental setup tested the null hypothesis that no statistically significant differences would be found in the variation of the mean Commission International de l’Eclairage (CIE) L* a* b* color coordinates of the cervical barrier, made with two different calcium silicate-based cements, either in contact with saline solution or blood.

2. Results

Table 1 presents the descriptive statistics of the mean CIE L* a* b* coordinates of the cervical barrier for all groups at each period of evaluation (T3H, T72H, T7D, and T6M). Due to the inherent color of the CSC materials, three hours post-compaction of the barriers against saline solution, MTA presented L* values statistically higher than Biodentine (p = 0.005), whereas no statistically significant differences could be detected between the blood-compacted groups (p = 0.312). The four groups showed a significant decrease in L* values over time. While Biodentine samples revealed a constant decrease in lightness, the samples with MTA revealed an intense reduction in the L* values from T7D to T6M, regardless of the treatment (saline or blood). For this reason, MTA showed the highest decrease from T3H to T6M with mean differences of 8.67 (95% CI: [5.87–11.45]) and 8.57 (95% CI: [3.73–13.41]), respectively, for the samples in contact with saline and blood. The lightness of Biodentine samples decreased 4.41 (95% CI: [2.79–6.03]) and 4.46 (95% CI: [2.59–6.33]) points, respectively, when in contact with saline or blood. The kinetic analysis of the relative variation of the L* parameter over time (3 h to 6 m) shows superior variation for MTA groups when compared to the Biodentine groups (Figure 1A).
MTA barriers presented neutral values within the blue/magenta channel (a*) in all periods of evaluation, regardless of the treatment, whereas Biodentine barriers present a slight deviation towards the positive (red) portion of the spectrum. In all groups, the b* values were located within the positive portion of the spectrum, conferring a yellowish aspect to the barriers, which was more noticeable in the Biodentine samples. Though significant in some cases (Table 1), the variations of the color channels a* and b* were not significant within the complete spectrum (Supplementary File 1).
The total ΔE from T3H to each of the following evaluations is presented in Figure 1b. Color variation increased over time for all groups but was not statistically significant for Biodentine/blood group. Two-way analysis of variance determined no interaction between the barrier material and the treatment (Table 2).
Treatment (saline or blood) had no influence on ΔE in any of the intervals evaluated (Table 2). The CSC used was the factor responsible for ΔE over time, inducing statistically significant color variations from T3H to T7D (p = 0.04) and T3H to T6M (p < 0.01). After 6 months, MTA samples in contact with saline had 5.08 (95% CI: [2.38–7.84], p = 0.001) higher ΔE than the corresponding samples of Biodentine, and the MTA/blood had 3.65 (95% CI: [0.95–6.35], p = 0.009) higher ΔE than Biodentine/blood. MTA had the highest color variation.
At 6 months all groups presented perceptible color changes (ΔE > 3.3), statistically significant at the α = 0.01 level.

3. Discussion

Tooth discoloration following REPs has been described as an undesirable consequence and a valuable patient-centered outcome that affects quality of life when anterior teeth are involved [13]. Treatment, planning, and selection must rely on adequate knowledge of the potential discoloration etiological factors, as well as the underlying mechanisms, in order to achieve endodontic therapy success regarding biological, functional, and esthetical aspects [18]. The purpose of the present study was to assess the color stability of both MTA and Biodentine, over a 6-month period and, therefore, unveil the role played by blood exposure on discoloration severity. This matter holds high clinical significance since blood exposure is likely to occur in several endodontic procedures, including cervical sealing performed in REPs [20,21].
Previous studies reported blood contamination as a factor that exacerbates discoloration in calcium silicate-based materials [18,19,20,21], with bismuth oxide-free Portland cement also presenting color alteration subsequent to blood exposure [18]. The hypothesis of unset MTA presenting surface porosities, which uptake blood elements, has been formulated to explain CSC discoloration enhancement, as the long hydration process inherent to MTA may allow erythrocyte sorption and their further hemolysis, ultimately leading to material and tooth discoloration [18,19]. Contrariwise, Biodentine exhibits a shorter setting time of approximately 12 min [22]. The faster setting of this hydraulic material might present an explanation for the superior color stability of the Biodentine/blood group, when compared to MTA/blood group, since it may limit blood absorption. This hypothesis was proposed in previous studies which also found greater color stability with Biodentine [23]. Recently, a new CSC material (PulpGuard, Coltène/Whaledent, Altstätten, Switzerland) was introduced, showing a record setting time of 3 min, with previous studies confirming a favorable cytocompatibility profile [24]. Another suggested mechanism for tooth discoloration following MTA placement may be expounded by the oxidation and incorporation of the remaining iron content in the set material [19]. Hence, over time, contact with blood triggers loss of the ferrous (Fe2+) ion contained within the center of the porphyrin ring through a natural redox reaction that originates Fe3+, a dark brown component prone to promote material and, consequently, tooth discoloration [19]. Guimarães et al. researched the effect of propylene glycol in MTA color variation and found the 80% distilled water/20% propylene glycol vehicle significantly lowered the degree of color change when blood exposure occurred [20]. Furthermore, the penetration of blood into tooth structure, with hemoglobin or hematin molecules present within the dentinal tubules, may induce discoloration [25].
Since discoloration results obtained from ex vivo or in vivo models may arise from both material and tooth discoloration influence when in contact with blood, the present study was conducted using an in vitro acrylic model, which allows for solely analyzing the role played by blood–CSC interaction in the color stability of the biomaterials. Furthermore, the experimental model used in the present study aims to anatomically simulate a permanent immature tooth eligible for performing regenerative endodontic procedures on. Regarding sample preparation and, likewise, revascularization protocols [26], root canals were filled up with blood (grouped by MTA/blood and Biodentine/blood) and then a cervical barrier was created. Although the applied protocol mimics the clinical routine, we speculate that MTA and Biodentine discoloration severity may be enhanced by the placement and condensation of CSC against the blood already delivered into the root canal. It is crucial to ensure complete hemostasis [21] and perform adequate blood clot stabilization, as well as to clean the blood present on dentin walls as meticulously as possible, to prevent blood influx into the tooth structure prior to CSC placement within the coronal portion of the root canal.
Regarding the composition of the biomaterial used as a cervical plug in REPs, MTA comprises bismuth oxide (Bi2O3) as a radiopacifier [27,28]. Previous studies show that MTA can lead to tooth discoloration [14,18,19,29], with data confirming both the hypothesis of bismuth (a) changing from its oxide form to metal by reduction, resulting in a black compound and subsequent tooth staining, or (b) undergoing oxidation when in contact with a strong oxidizing agent (namely sodium hypochlorite and amino acids from dentin matrix collagen) and producing bismuth carbonate, which results in a black precipitate when exposed to light [30,31,32].
Regarding environmental influence, Vallés et al. [33] suggest that bismuth oxide presents oxygen and light sensitivity. In the current study, sample preparation was performed in simultaneous aerobic conditions with exposure to environment light, with all specimens being subsequently stored in the absence of light. Since the conditions were not verified throughout the experimental period of analysis, the potential influence of oxygen and light on the obtained results was lessened.
It is noteworthy that CSCs presenting alternative agents to provide radiopacity within their formula, such as Biodentine containing zirconium oxide (ZrO2) rather than bismuth oxide, consistently exhibit superior color stability in previous studies [14,16,17,34], which agrees with our findings.
In this study, color variation increased over time for all groups but was not statistically significant for Biodentine/blood group. However, the four groups showed a significant decrease in L* values over time, with MTA samples revealing late darkening associated with intense reduction in the L* values from T7D to T6M, regardless of the liquid treatment (blood or saline solution). Two-way analysis of variance showed no interaction between the CSC and blood/saline. Furthermore, we found that treatment had no influence on color variation in any of the intervals evaluated. In fact, the CSC used was the factor responsible for ΔE over time, with MTA presenting the highest color variation. Our findings highlight the main role played by the material composition, rather than the blood exposure, in discoloration. However, in this model, the use of a gelatin matrix to resemble a typical regeneration procedure could absorb blood, thus reducing the available amount of blood in contact with the CSC, hence limiting its effect on discoloration. It is noteworthy that we used the complete plug area to obtain the average L* a* b* coordinates of each sample for shade analysis at all timeframes. Additionally, we analyzed each plug by thirds, as follows: apical third, median third, and coronal third. In those three cases, the results did not vary between groups. Naturally, the apical third presented higher color variation in all samples and the remaining two-thirds presented the highest color stability. Nonetheless, it is important to mention, once more, that selecting any of the thirds did not modify the results.
Ultimately, it should also be deemed that other variables not accounted for in this experimental study might play a noteworthy role on tooth discoloration. Nevertheless, the material used remains a key factor to consider in the decision-making process.
Regarding long-term success of endodontic procedures, including REPs, adequate coronal sealing is mandatory [35]. Besides our results reporting a lower discoloration degree regardless of the contact with blood, previous studies show that Biodentine might allow immediate (12 min after biomaterial placement) restoration, while restorative procedures performed directly on top of MTA may preferably be performed in a delayed timeframe [22]. Further clinical studies are needed to confirm these results and to provide information regarding the exact mechanisms inherent to CSC and subsequent tooth discoloration.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Experimental Groups

A total of 40 acrylic single-rooted transparent teeth (model 2111-102-PCL2, DRSK, Hässleholm, Sweden), presenting both occlusal access cavity and immature apex, were used in the present study with the ultimate goal of providing a simulation model of permanent teeth eligible for performing regenerative endodontic procedures on, inspired by a previously described model [26].
The artificial teeth were randomly divided in two main groups according to the CSC used to perform cervical sealing: ProRoot MTA® or Biodentine.
Each one of the main groups was secondarily divided in two groups (n = 10) depending on the filling of the root canal with either saline solution (groups of MTA/saline and Biodentine/saline) or blood (groups of MTA/blood and Biodentine/blood).

4.2. Sample Preparation

The apical opening of the acrylic teeth was first sealed with sticky wax in order to avoid extrusion. Informed consent was obtained from one participant, according to the approval of the Ethical Committee of IRB of the Faculty of Medicine—University of Coimbra (notification CE001/2013), and blood was collected to (a) determine hematocrit value (46.4%) and (b) to fill the root canal space of specimens of blood groups. Root canals were filled up to 3 mm below the level of the cement–enamel junction (CEJ) with either 7 µL of saline solution (MTA/saline and Biodentine/saline groups) or blood (MTA/blood and Biodentine/blood groups).
Subsequently, a 2 mm3 absorbable hemostatic gelatin matrix (Spongostan Dental, MS0005, Ethicon Inc., New Jersey, EUA) was placed in the root canal 3 mm apical to the level of the CEJ.
ProRoot MTA® (MTA/saline and MTA/blood groups) or Biodentine (Biodentine/saline and Biodentine/blood groups) were then prepared according a previous study [22]. CSC application was performed to create a 3 mm cervical barrier under 16× magnification with a dental microscope (Leica M320 F12, Leica Microsystems, Werzlar, Germany).
A sterile saline (sodium chloride 0.9%, Labesfal, Santiago de Besteiros, Portugal) wet cotton pellet was applied over the biomaterial and teeth standardly positioned with crowns facing downwards (Figure 2). All specimens were stored in a dark environment, in an incubator (Gallenkamp, London, UK) at 37 °C and 100% relative humidity throughout the experimental period.

4.3. Photographic Record

The photographic record of the samples was taken with a Canon EOS 5DsR camera using a Canon MP-E 65 mm Macro Lens and a ring flash with cross polarized filters. The settings used were 2× magnification on the manual lens, 1/125 shutter speed, F16 aperture, ISO 100, custom white balance with a 18% grey card, and RAW file format for saving pictures, as seen in Figure 3. Standard positioning of the samples was accomplished by developing a custom-made arm with a silicone (Virtual Refill Putty Fast Set, Ivoclar Vivadent AG, Schaan, Liechtenstein) tip, matching the incisal edge of the acrylic models.

4.4. Color Assessment

Color measurement was carried out at four different evaluation periods after sample preparation as follows: (1) T3H: 3 h, (2) T72H: 72 h, (3) T7D: 7 days, and (4) T6M: 6 months. Shade analysis within the Commission International de l’Eclairage (CIE) L* a* b* color space was performed using ImageJ software (ImageJ v1.52; National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). L* (which corresponds to lightness, ranging from 0 = black to 100 = white), a* (which includes color components from (−) green up to (+) red), and b* (which includes color components from (−) blue up to (+) yellow) values were obtained considering the total CSC area (the complete cervical barrier region was selected and parametric L*, a*, and b* medium values were estimated by the software for each specimen). Subsequently, color variation (∆E) was calculated by using the following formula:
∆E = [(∆L)2 + (∆a)2 + (∆b)2]1/2.

4.5. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS v.23 software. Evaluation of the L* a* b* variables of each group in the four periods was performed with repeated ANOVA measures, considering the material and treatment as fixed factors. Assessments of color changes between the first measurement (T3H) and each of the following periods of evaluation (T72H, T7D, and T6M) were made using two-way ANOVA. Group comparisons for each ∆E were performed with one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc comparisons. Assessments of ∆E within each group were made using the non-parametric Friedman test. ∆E was deemed to be perceptible by the human eye upon comparison with the 3.3 threshold value [34] using the one sample t-test (one-tail). The significance level was set at α = 0.05.

5. Conclusions

The choice of the material for cervical barriers must consider not only the clinical and radiographic outcomes, but also the esthetic results. In this case, additional concerns are raised due to the possibility of contact with blood, with unpredictable staining of the cervical barrier and, consequently, of the dental structure. This study demonstrates that the contact with blood does not modify the color alterations suffered by the calcium silicate-based cements after a 6-month period. Within the two materials, Biodentine exhibits superior color stability than MTA.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4983/10/1/14/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.J.P., J.M.S., and J.C.R.; Data curation, J.A.M., E.C., and A.V.; Formal analysis, J.A.M. and J.M.S.; Investigation, P.J.P. and E.C.; Methodology, P.J.P. and J.C.R.; Project administration, P.J.P. and J.C.R.; Resources, P.J.P., R.I.F., E.C., and A.V.; Software, J.A.M. and R.I.F.; Supervision, P.J.P. and J.C.R.; Validation, J.M.S.; Visualization, R.I.F., E.C., A.V., and J.M.S.; Writing—original draft, P.J.P., J.A.M., R.I.F., E.C., and A.V.; Writing—review & editing, P.J.P., J.M.S., and J.C.R.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Ana Messias of the Dentistry Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Portugal and Professor Francisco Caramelo of the Laboratory of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics (LBIM), Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal, for the valuable help in the statistical analysis. The authors would also like to acknowledge Cláudia Brites of the Hard Tissues Histology Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra for assisting with the sample storage.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hattab, F.N.; Qudeimat, M.A.; al-Rimawi, H.S. Dental discoloration: An overview. J. Esthet. Dent. 1999, 11, 291–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ahmed, H.M.; Abbott, P.V. Discolouration potential of endodontic procedures and materials: A review. Int. Endod. J. 2012, 45, 883–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rafter, M. Apexification: A review. Dent. Traumatol. 2005, 21, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Parirokh, M.; Torabinejad, M. Mineral trioxide aggregate: A comprehensive literature review—Part III: Clinical applications, drawbacks, and mechanism of action. J. Endod. 2010, 36, 400–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Mente, J.; Leo, M.; Panagidis, D.; Ohle, M.; Schneider, S.; Bermejo, J.L.; Pfefferle, T. Treatment outcome of mineral trioxide aggregate in open apex teeth. J. Endod. 2013, 39, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Murray, P.E.; Garcia-Godoy, F.; Hargreaves, K.M. Regenerative endodontics: A review of current status and a call for action. J. Endod. 2007, 33, 377–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Palma, P.J.; Ramos, J.C.; Martins, J.B.; Diogenes, A.; Figueiredo, M.H.; Ferreira, P.; Viegas, C.; Santos, J.M. Histologic evaluation of regenerative endodontic procedures with the use of chitosan scaffolds in immature dog teeth with apical periodontitis. J. Endod. 2017, 43, 1279–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Hargreaves, K.M.; Geisler, T.; Henry, M.; Wang, Y. Regeneration potential of the young permanent tooth: What does the future hold? J. Endod. 2008, 34, S51–S56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Nosrat, A.; Homayounfar, N.; Oloomi, K. Drawbacks and unfavorable outcomes of regenerative endodontic treatments of necrotic immature teeth: A literature review and report of a case. J. Endod. 2012, 38, 1428–1434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Endodontists AAo. AAE Clinical Considerations for a Regenerative Procedure. 2016. Available online: https://http://www.aae.org/specialty/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2017/06/currentregenerativeendodonticconsiderations.pdf (accessed on 25 April 2018).
  11. Galler, K.M.; Krastl, G.; Simon, S.; Van Gorp, G.; Meschi, N.; Vahedi, B.; Lambrechts, P. European Society of Endodontology position statement: Revitalization procedures. Int. Endod. J. 2016, 49, 717–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Torabinejad, M.; Nosrat, A.; Verma, P.; Udochukwu, O. Regenerative Endodontic Treatment or Mineral Trioxide Aggregate Apical Plug in Teeth with Necrotic Pulps and Open Apices: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J. Endod. 2017, 43, 1806–1820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kahler, B.; Rossi-Fedele, G. A Review of Tooth Discoloration after Regenerative Endodontic Therapy. J. Endod. 2016, 42, 563–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kohli, M.R.; Yamaguchi, M.; Setzer, F.C.; Karabucak, B. Spectrophotometric Analysis of Coronal Tooth Discoloration Induced by Various Bioceramic Cements and Other Endodontic Materials. J. Endod. 2015, 41, 1862–1866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Septodont. Biodentine Active Biosilicate Technology. 2017. Available online: http://www.septodont.co.uk/sites/uk/files/2016-08/brochure Biodentine HD UK.pdf (accessed on 13 June 2017).
  16. Valles, M.; Roig, M.; Duran-Sindreu, F.; Martinez, S.; Mercade, M. Color Stability of Teeth Restored with Biodentine: A 6-month In Vitro Study. J. Endod. 2015, 41, 1157–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ramos, J.C.; Palma, P.J.; Nascimento, R.; Caramelo, F.; Messias, A.; Vinagre, A.; Santos, J.M. 1-year In vitro evaluation of tooth discoloration induced by 2 calcium silicate-based cements. J. Endod. 2016, 42, 1403–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Lenherr, P.; Allgayer, N.; Weiger, R.; Filippi, A.; Attin, T.; Krastl, G. Tooth discoloration induced by endodontic materials: A laboratory study. Int. Endod. J. 2012, 45, 942–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Felman, D.; Parashos, P. Coronal tooth discoloration and white mineral trioxide aggregate. J. Endod. 2013, 39, 484–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Guimaraes, B.M.; Tartari, T.; Marciano, M.A.; Vivan, R.R.; Mondeli, R.F.; Camilleri, J.; Duarte, M.A.H. Color stability, radiopacity, and chemical characteristics of white mineral trioxide aggregate associated with 2 different vehicles in contact with blood. J. Endod. 2015, 41, 947–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Shokouhinejad, N.; Nekoofar, M.H.; Pirmoazen, S.; Shamshiri, A.R.; Dummer, P.M. Evaluation and Comparison of Occurrence of Tooth Discoloration after the Application of Various Calcium Silicate-based Cements: An Ex Vivo Study. J. Endod. 2016, 42, 140–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Palma, P.J.; Marques, J.A.; Falacho, R.I.; Vinagre, A.; Santos, J.M.; Ramos, J.C. Does Delayed Restoration Improve Shear Bond Strength of Different Restorative Protocols to Calcium Silicate-Based Cements? Materials 2018, 11, 2216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Yoldas, S.E.; Bani, M.; Atabek, D.; Bodur, H. Comparison of the Potential Discoloration Effect of Bioaggregate, Biodentine, and White Mineral Trioxide Aggregate on Bovine Teeth: In Vitro Research. J. Endod. 2016, 42, 1815–1818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Sequeira, D.; ASeabra, C.; Palma, P.J.; Cardoso, A.; Peça, J.; Santos, J.M. Effects of a New Bioceramic Material on Human Apical Papilla Cells. J. Funct. Biomater. 2018, 9, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Marin, P.D.; Bartold, P.M.; Heithersay, G.S. Tooth discoloration by blood: An in vitro histochemical study. Endod. Dent. Traumatol. 1997, 13, 132–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Widbiller, M.; Ducke, S.; Eidt, A.; Buchalla, W.; Galler, K.M. A training model for revitalization procedures. Int. Endod. J. 2018, 51 (Suppl. 4), e301–e308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Camilleri, J.; Montesin, F.E.; Brady, K.; Sweeney, R.; Curtis, R.V.; Ford, T.R. The constitution of mineral trioxide aggregate. Dent. Mater. 2005, 21, 297–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Torabinejad, M.; Parirokh, M.; Dummer, P.M.H. Mineral trioxide aggregate and other bioactive endodontic cements: An updated overview—Part II: Other clinical applications and complications. Int. Endod. J. 2018, 51, 284–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Jang, J.H.; Kang, M.; Ahn, S.; Kim, S.; Kim, W.; Kim, Y.; Kim, E. Tooth discoloration after the use of new pozzolan cement (Endocem) and mineral trioxide aggregate and the effects of internal bleaching. J. Endod. 2013, 39, 1598–1602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Camilleri, J. Color stability of white mineral trioxide aggregate in contact with hypochlorite solution. J. Endod. 2014, 40, 436–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Marciano, M.A.; Costa, R.M.; Camilleri, J.; Mondelli, R.F.; Guimaraes, B.M.; Duarte, M.A. Assessment of color stability of white mineral trioxide aggregate angelus and bismuth oxide in contact with tooth structure. J. Endod. 2014, 40, 1235–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Marciano, M.A.; Duarte, M.A.; Camilleri, J. Dental discoloration caused by bismuth oxide in MTA in the presence of sodium hypochlorite. Clin. Oral Investig. 2015, 19, 2201–2209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Valles, M.; Mercade, M.; Duran-Sindreu, F.; Bourdelande, J.L.; Roig, M. Influence of light and oxygen on the color stability of five calcium silicate-based materials. J. Endod. 2013, 39, 525–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Marconyak, L.J., Jr.; Kirkpatrick, T.C.; Roberts, H.W.; Roberts, M.D.; Aparicio, A.; Himel, V.T.; Sabey, K.A. A Comparison of Coronal Tooth Discoloration Elicited by Various Endodontic Reparative Materials. J. Endod. 2016, 42, 470–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Santos, J.M.; Palma, P.J.; Ramos, J.C.; Cabrita, A.S.; Friedman, S. Periapical inflammation subsequent to coronal inoculation of dog teeth root filled with resilon/epiphany in 1 or 2 treatment sessions with chlorhexidine medication. J. Endod. 2014, 40, 837–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Color variation of the cervical barriers for all groups and assessment periods. (A) Relative variation of Commission International de l’Eclairage (CIE) parameter L* value of groups measured at T3H, T72H, T7D, and T6M. The relative variation of lightness decreases significantly in all groups over time. The vertical lines represent the 95% CI. (B) Graphical representation of the total color variation (ΔE) from T3H to each of the following evaluations. The vertical lines represent the 95% CI. One-way ANOVA did not detect significant differences between groups for ΔE T3H − T72H (p = 0.724) and for ΔE T3H − T7D (p = 0.198). After 6 months, statistically significant differences were found between groups for ΔE T3H − T72H (p = 0.001). Similar superscript letters denote pairs of groups that differ at the 0.05 level. MTA, mineral trioxide aggregate.
Figure 1. Color variation of the cervical barriers for all groups and assessment periods. (A) Relative variation of Commission International de l’Eclairage (CIE) parameter L* value of groups measured at T3H, T72H, T7D, and T6M. The relative variation of lightness decreases significantly in all groups over time. The vertical lines represent the 95% CI. (B) Graphical representation of the total color variation (ΔE) from T3H to each of the following evaluations. The vertical lines represent the 95% CI. One-way ANOVA did not detect significant differences between groups for ΔE T3H − T72H (p = 0.724) and for ΔE T3H − T7D (p = 0.198). After 6 months, statistically significant differences were found between groups for ΔE T3H − T72H (p = 0.001). Similar superscript letters denote pairs of groups that differ at the 0.05 level. MTA, mineral trioxide aggregate.
Jfb 10 00014 g001
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the experimental setup and storing teeth position.
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the experimental setup and storing teeth position.
Jfb 10 00014 g002
Figure 3. Color assessment of randomly selected representative samples from each experimental group at the four evaluated timeframes (T3H, T72H, T7D, and T6M). The blue line represents the total CSC area considered for the shade analysis within the Commission International de l’Eclairage (CIE) L* a* b* color space for all timeframes.
Figure 3. Color assessment of randomly selected representative samples from each experimental group at the four evaluated timeframes (T3H, T72H, T7D, and T6M). The blue line represents the total CSC area considered for the shade analysis within the Commission International de l’Eclairage (CIE) L* a* b* color space for all timeframes.
Jfb 10 00014 g003
Table 1. Mean values and standard deviation of each of the L* a* b* coordinates of each group for all periods of evaluation.
Table 1. Mean values and standard deviation of each of the L* a* b* coordinates of each group for all periods of evaluation.
GroupsCoordinatesT3HT72HT7DT6Mp
MTA/SalineL*78.52 ± 1.5875.95 ± 1.7973.51 ± 2.4369.86 ± 1.88<0.01 *
a*−0.68 ± 0.10−0.56 ± 0.140.05 ± 0.220.78 ± 0.78<0.01 *
b*5.15 ± 0.365.53 ± 0.785.51 ± 0.598.37 ± 3.280.016 *
Biodentine/SalineL*73.87 ± 1.3772.39 ± 0.8471.11 ± 1.4269.46 ± 1.92<0.01 *
a*2.88 ± 0.163.12 ± 0.253.22 ± 0.273.36 ± 0.290.003 *
b*11.12 ± 0.9211.89 ± 1.0111.90 ± 1.1312.21 ± 0.980.0046
MTA/BloodL*72.79 ± 5.7070.86 ± 4.8169.07 ± 4.0664.22 ± 4.95<0.001 *
a*0.20 ± 0.63−0.02 ±0.0370.41 ± 0.490.41 ± 0.640.047
b*7.14 ± 2.787.44 ± 2.737.80 ± 2.927.65 ± 2.240.593
Biodentine/BloodL*71.21 ± 3.2270.33 ± 3.9869.07 ± 4.1066.75 ± 3.38<0.01 *
a*2.92 ± 0.232.48 ± 0.482.69 ± 0.552.88 ± 0.370.128
b*9.32 ± 0.938.77 ± 2.569.33 ± 1.7811.05 ±1.650.035 *
* Statistically significant different (p < 0.05). MTA, mineral trioxide aggregate.
Table 2. Two-way analysis of variance of the color variation of the samples, from baseline to each evaluation point (ΔE value ± standard deviation).
Table 2. Two-way analysis of variance of the color variation of the samples, from baseline to each evaluation point (ΔE value ± standard deviation).
MTA/SalineBiodentine/SalineMTA/BloodBiodentine/BloodTwo-Way ANOVA
Factor MaterialFactor TreatmentInteraction (Material * Treatment)
ΔE T3H − T72H2.76 ± 1.432.00 ± 0.882.53 ± 2.232.76 ± 1.960.6250.6290.364
ΔE T3H − T7D5.14 ± 3.033.01 ± 1.104.49 ± 3.653.26 ± 1.070.040 *0.7980.568
ΔE T3H − T6M9.84 ± 2.674.76 ± 1.488.77 ± 4.735.12 ± 1.63<0.01 *0.7080.452
Friedman test<0.01 *0.01 *<0.01 *0.082
Each evaluation point (ΔE value ± standard deviation). * Statistically significant different (p < 0.05).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Palma, P.J.; Marques, J.A.; Falacho, R.I.; Correia, E.; Vinagre, A.; Santos, J.M.; Ramos, J.C. Six-Month Color Stability Assessment of Two Calcium Silicate-Based Cements Used in Regenerative Endodontic Procedures. J. Funct. Biomater. 2019, 10, 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb10010014

AMA Style

Palma PJ, Marques JA, Falacho RI, Correia E, Vinagre A, Santos JM, Ramos JC. Six-Month Color Stability Assessment of Two Calcium Silicate-Based Cements Used in Regenerative Endodontic Procedures. Journal of Functional Biomaterials. 2019; 10(1):14. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb10010014

Chicago/Turabian Style

Palma, Paulo J., Joana A. Marques, Rui I. Falacho, Eder Correia, Alexandra Vinagre, João Miguel Santos, and João C. Ramos. 2019. "Six-Month Color Stability Assessment of Two Calcium Silicate-Based Cements Used in Regenerative Endodontic Procedures" Journal of Functional Biomaterials 10, no. 1: 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb10010014

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop