Sustainable Development of Oil and Gas Potential of the Arctic and Its Shelf Zone: The Role of Innovations
Abstract
1. Introduction
1.1. Role of Innovations in Sustainable Development of Resources
1.2. Problems of Arctic Development
1.3. Innovation Policy Roadmap
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results and Discussion
- (1)
- Sustainable development of oil and gas in the Arctic zone (especially the shelf) is a very urgent industrial and research issue due to the strategic importance of Arctic reserves, environmental and social challenges on the one hand and the lack of a research basis for it on another;
- (2)
- Sustainable development of oil and gas fields in the Arctic zone is impossible without an innovative approach and the implementation of innovation policy, which could be done using the IPRM method;
- (3)
- Understanding the role of innovations in the sustainable development of oil and gas potential of the Arctic zone is possible due to the innovation policy roadmap as well as tracking the achievement of SDGs using innovations;
- (4)
- The SDGs concept needs adaptation to the peculiarities of development of oil and gas potential of the Arctic;
- (5)
- The combination of IPRM and the identified role of innovation provides the possibility to distribute resources or other types of support on urgent issues, projects, spheres or territories.
4. Conclusions
- (1)
- Substantiation of strategic importance of sustainable development of Russian Arctic offshore oil and resources due to its great potential on the one hand and depletion of existing fields and scarcity of resources on the other.
- (2)
- Identification of the main challenges that justify the necessity of an innovation approach for the sustainable development of Russian Arctic oil and gas potential, which is supported by national interests in this sphere.
- (3)
- Adaptation of the SDGs concept to the issue of sustainable development of oil and gas potential of the Arctic and its shelf and the provision of a list of SDGs that are involved in this process and provide sustainability in economic, social and environmental aspects.
- (4)
- Innovation policy roadmap for the sustainable development of the oil and gas potential of the Arctic and its shelf zone that presents actors involved in the process and facilitates the creation of a common vision for the basis of innovation policy as well as providing analysis of social, environmental, industrial and other aspects in policy practice that arise from technological development.
- (5)
- Determining the role of innovation for the achievement of SDGs and for the sustainable development of the oil and gas potential of the Arctic and its shelf zone using IPRM together with the adopted SDGs concept.
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Gritsenko, D.; Efimova, E. Is there Arctic resource curse? Evidence from the Russian Arctic regions. Resour. Policy 2020, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Alekseev, G.V.; Antipov, S.K.; Afonichkin, A.I.; Afonichkina, E.A.; Baburov, S.V.; Balashova, E.S.; Bondareva, N.N.; Borisov, V.N.; Vylegzhanina, A.O.; Goryachevskaya, E.S.; et al. The Arctic Space of Russia in the XXI Century: Development Factors, Management; Ivanter, V.V., Ed.; LLC Publishing House: St. Petersburg, Russia, 2016; pp. 630–655. ISBN 9785990233959. [Google Scholar]
- Zuev, A. Oil and gas klondike of the Arctic. FEC Russia 2018, 12. Available online: https://www.cdu.ru/tek_russia/issue/2018/12/545/ (accessed on 20 August 2020).
- Dmitrievskiy, A.N.; Eremin, N.A.; Shabalin, N.A.; Kondratyuk, A.T.; Eremin, A.N. State and prospects for the development of hydrocarbon resources of the Arctic shelf of Russia. Neftegaz.RU 2017, 1, 32–41. [Google Scholar]
- Krasnopol’skiy, V.G. Oil spills in the Arctic. Problems and solutions. Neftegaz.RU 2019, 5, 104–106. [Google Scholar]
- Ilinova, A.A.; Dmitrieva, D.M. The mechanism of innovative development of the Russian arctic zone. Int. J. Mech. Eng. Technol. 2018, 9, 1439–1451. [Google Scholar]
- Cherepovitsyn, A.E.; Kraslavski, A. Research of the innovative potential of an oil and gas company at different stages of field development. J. Min. Inst. 2016, 222, 892–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No. 164 of 5th March, 2020. On the Fundamentals of State Policy of the Russian Federation in the Arctic for the Period up to 2035. Available online: https://www.gov.spb.ru/gov/otrasl/arkt/documents/ (accessed on 24 July 2020).
- The Project of Strategy for the Development of the Arctic up to 2035 is Submitted to the Government of the Russian Federation. Available online: https://minvr.gov.ru/press-center/news/24847/ (accessed on 18 August 2020).
- Malinauskaite, L.; Cook, D.; Davíðsdóttir, B.; Ögmundardóttir, H.; Roman, J. Ecosystem services in the Arctic: A thematic review. Ecosyst. Serv. 2019, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kuzma, E.; Padilha, L.S.; Sehnem, S.; Julkovski, D.J.; Roman, D.J. The relationship between innovation and sustainability: A meta-analytic study. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 259, 120745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Adams, R.; Jeanrenaud, S.; Bessant, J.; Denyer, D.; Overy, P. Sustainability-oriented Innovation: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 2016, 18, 180–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Freire, R.; Costa, E.; Alves, J.; Brito, C. A dialectic on innovation and sustainability. International. J. Innov. Sustain. Dev. 2019, 13, 246–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Shrivastava, P.; Ivanaj, S.; Ivanaj, V. Strategic technological innovation for sustainable development. Int. J. Technol. Manag. 2016, 70, 76–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Omri, A. Technological innovation and sustainable development: Does the stage of development matter? Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2020, 83, 106398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Barbieri, J.C.; de Vasconcelos, I.F.G.; Andreassi, T.; de Vasconcelos, F.C. Innovation and sustainability: New models and propositions. Rev. Adm. Empres. 2010, 50, 146–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Nill, J.; Kemp, R. Evolutionary approaches for sustainable innovation policies: From niche to paradigm? Res. Policy 2009, 38, 668–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Available online: https://sdgs.un.org/goals (accessed on 15 July 2020).
- Rosati, F.; Faria, L.G.D. Business contribution to the Sustainable Development Agenda: Organizational factors related to early adoption of SDG reporting. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2019, 26, 588–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ike, M.; Donovan, J.D.; Topple, C.; Masli, E.K. The process of selecting and prioritising corporate sustainability issues: Insights for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 236, 117661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hacking, T. The SDGs and the sustainability assessment of private-sector projects: Theoretical conceptualisation and comparison with current practice using the case study of the Asian Development Bank. Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais. 2019, 37, 2–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Omer, M.A.B.; Noguchi, T. A conceptual framework for understanding the contribution of building materials in the achievement of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Sustain. Cities Soc. 2020, 52, 101869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Mapping Mining to the Sustainable Development Goals: An Atlas. Available online: https://www.commdev.org/pdf/publications/P_Mapping_Mining_SDG.pdf (accessed on 5 August 2020).
- Starke, L. Breaking New Ground: Mining, Minerals and Sustainable Development; Routledge: London, UK, 2016; ISBN 9781315541501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Endl, A.; Tost, M.; Hitch, M.; Moser, P.; Feiel, S. Europe’s mining innovation trends and their contribution to the sustainable development goals: Blind spots and strong points. Resour. Policy 2019, 101440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gorman, M.R.; Dzombak, D.A. A review of sustainable mining and resource management: Transitioning from the life cycle of the mine to the life cycle of the mineral. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2018, 137, 281–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Calas, G. Mineral Resources and Sustainable Development. Elements 2017, 13, 301–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ucal, M.; Xydis, G. Multidirectional Relationship between Energy Resources, Climate Changes and Sustainable Development: Technoeconomic Analysis. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2020, 60, 102210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Dobra, J.; Dobra, M.; Ouedraogo, A. Does mineral development provide a basis for sustainable economic development? Resour. Policy 2018, 58, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Katysheva, E.; Tsvetkova, A. Economic and institutional problems of the Russian oil and gas complex digital transformation. In Proceedings of the International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management, Albena, Bulgaria, 30 June–6 July 2019; STEF92 Technology Ltd.: Sofia, Bulgaria, 2019; Volume 19, pp. 203–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Stadler, C. Process innovation and integration in process-oriented settings: The case of the oil industry. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 2011, 28, 44–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Radnejad, A.B.; Vredenburg, H.; Woiceshyn, J. Meta-organizing for open innovation under environmental and social pressures in the oil industry. Technovation 2017, 66, 14–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Radnejad, A.B.; Vredenburg, H. Collaborative competitors in a fast–changing technology environment: Open innovation in environmental technology development in the oil and gas industry. Int. J. Entrep. Innov. Manag. 2015, 19, 77–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Radnejad, A.B.; Osiyevskyy, O.; Vredenburg, H. Barriers to radical process innovation: A case of environmental technology in the oil industry. J. Strategy Manag. 2020, 13, 453–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Andreassen, N. Arctic energy development in Russia—How “sustainability” can fit? Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2016, 16, 78–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hintsala, H.; Niemelä, S.; Tervonen, P. Arctic potential—Could more structured view improve the understanding of Arctic business opportunities? Polar Sci. 2016, 10, 450–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Knol, M.; Arbo, P. Oil spill response in the Arctic: Norwegian experiences and future perspectives. Marine Policy 2014, 50, 171–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Carayannis, E.; Ilinova, A.; Chanysheva, A. Russian Arctic Offshore Oil and Gas Projects: Methodological Framework for Evaluating Their Prospects. J. Knowl. Econ. 2019, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Harsem, Ø.; Eide, A.; Heen, K. Factors influencing future oil and gas prospects in the Arctic. Energy Policy 2011, 39, 8037–8045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Johannsdottir, L.; Cook, D. Systemic risk of maritime-related oil spills viewed from an Arctic and insurance perspective. Ocean Coastal Manag. 2019, 179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Carayannis, E.G.; Ilinova, A.A.; Cherepovitsyn, A.E. Sustainable Development of the Russian Arctic zone energy shelf: The Role of the Quintuple Innovation Helix Model. J. Knowl. Econ. June 2017, 8, 456–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Georghiou, L.; Keenan, M. Evaluation of National Foresight Activities: Assessing Rationale, Process and Impact. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2006, 73, 761–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ahlqvist, T.; Valovirta, V.; Loikkanen, T. Innovation policy roadmapping as a systemic instrument for forward-looking policy design. Sci. Public Policy 2012, 39, 178–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Rama Mohan, S. Strategy and design of Innovation Policy Road Mapping for a waste biorefinery. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 215, 76–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Cherepovitsyn, A.E.; Chvileva, T.A.; Romasheva, N.V. Prospects for the exploration of hydrocarbon deposits in the Arctic based on socio-economic evaluation. Int. J. Civ. Eng. Technol. 2018, 9, 938–948. [Google Scholar]
- Kruk, M.; Semenov, A.; Cherepovitsyn, A.; Nikulina, A. Environmental and economic damage from the development of oil and gas fields in the Arctic shelf of the Russian Federation. Eur. Res. Stud. J. 2018, 21, 423–433. [Google Scholar]
- Savard, C.; Nikulina, A.; Mécemmène, C.; Mokhova, E. The Electrification of Ships Using the Northern Sea Route: An Approach. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2020, 6, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Malaurie, J. Arctic Peoples in a Changing Environment: A Humanist’s Vision. In Climate Change and Arctic Sustainable Development: Scientific, Social, Cultural and Educational Challenges; UNESCO: Paris, France, 2009; pp. 131–136. ISBN 9789231041396. [Google Scholar]
- Abryutina, L. Indigenous Peoples of the Russian North: Social and Climatic Changes. In Climate Change and Arctic Sustainable Development: Scientific, Social, Cultural and Educational Challenges; UNESCO: Paris, France, 2009; pp. 181–190. ISBN 978-92-3-104139-6. [Google Scholar]
- Sauer, P.C.; Hiete, M. Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives as Social Innovation for Governance and Practice: A Review of Responsible Mining Initiatives. Sustainability 2020, 12, 236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Smorchkova, V.I.; Kharlamp’eva, N.D. Social innovations in Arctic municipalities as a factor of sustainable development. Arctic XXI Century Hum. Sci. 2015, 1, 30–39. [Google Scholar]
- Martynov, V.G.; Golunov, N.N.; Makarova, E.D. Foresight of innovation. Changes in technologies and tools for management of innovations in the oil and gas complex. Neftegaz RU 2020, 6, 16–27. [Google Scholar]
- Official Website of Gazprom Neft Company. Available online: https://www.gazprom-neft.ru (accessed on 20 August 2020).





| The Main National Interests of the Russian Federation in the Arctic | The Main Directions of Implementation of the State Policy of the Russian Federation in the Arctic |
|---|---|
|
|
| Spheres | The Main Tools of Innovative Changes | Role for Sustainable Development of Russian Arctic oil and Gas Potential | Provided SDGs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prospecting and exploration of hydrocarbon deposits |
|
| SDG1 SDG7 SDG8 SDG9 SDG12 SDG15 |
| Drilling oil and gas wells |
|
| SDG1 SDG3 SDG6 SDG7 SDG8 SDG9 SDG13 SDG14 |
| Development of hydrocarbon deposits |
|
| SDG1 SDG6 SDG7 SDG8 SDG9 SDG12 SDG14 SDG15 SDG17 |
| Transportation and storage of hydrocarbons, logistics and sales of products of their processing |
|
| SDG1 SDG3 SDG6 SDG7 SDG8 SDG9 SDG11 SDG12 SDG17 |
| Environmental innovations |
|
| SDG3 SDG6 SDG7 SDG9 SDG11 SDG12 SDG13 SDG14 SDG15 SDG17 |
| Social innovations |
|
| SDG3 SDG8 SDG9 SDG11 SDG16 SDG17 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Dmitrieva, D.; Romasheva, N. Sustainable Development of Oil and Gas Potential of the Arctic and Its Shelf Zone: The Role of Innovations. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2020, 8, 1003. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8121003
Dmitrieva D, Romasheva N. Sustainable Development of Oil and Gas Potential of the Arctic and Its Shelf Zone: The Role of Innovations. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2020; 8(12):1003. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8121003
Chicago/Turabian StyleDmitrieva, Diana, and Natalia Romasheva. 2020. "Sustainable Development of Oil and Gas Potential of the Arctic and Its Shelf Zone: The Role of Innovations" Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 8, no. 12: 1003. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8121003
APA StyleDmitrieva, D., & Romasheva, N. (2020). Sustainable Development of Oil and Gas Potential of the Arctic and Its Shelf Zone: The Role of Innovations. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 8(12), 1003. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8121003

