Next Article in Journal
A Wave Energy Converter Design Load Case Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of Lebanon’s Offshore-Wind-Energy Potential
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of Anthropogenic Facilities on the Morphodynamic Evolution of an Estuarine System: The Case of Oum Er-Rbia Estuary (Azemmour, Morocco)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dynamic Response for a Submerged Floating Offshore Wind Turbine with Different Mooring Configurations
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

What about Marine Renewable Energies in Spain?

by
María Dolores Esteban
1,2,*,
Juan Manuel Espada
1,
José Marcos Ortega
3,
José-Santos López-Gutiérrez
2 and
Vicente Negro
2
1
Departamento de Ingeniería Civil, Universidad Europea, 28040 Madrid, Spain
2
Grupo de Investigación de Medio Marino, Costero y Portuario, y Otras Áreas Sensibles, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain
3
Departamento de Ingeniería Civil, Universidad de Alicante, Ap. Correos 99, 03080 Alacant/Alicante, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2019, 7(8), 249; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse7080249
Submission received: 4 July 2019 / Revised: 24 July 2019 / Accepted: 26 July 2019 / Published: 30 July 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Offshore Wind Farms)

Abstract

:
Renewable energies play a fundamental role within the current political and social framework for minimizing the impacts of climate change. The ocean has a vast potential for generating energy and therefore, the marine renewable energies are included in the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). These energies include wave, tidal, marine currents, ocean thermal, and osmotic. Moreover, it can also be included wind, solar, geothermal and biomass powers, which their main use is onshore, but in the near future their use at sea may be considered. The manuscript starts with a state-of-the-art review of the abovementioned marine renewable energy resources worldwide. The paper continues with a case study focused on the Spanish coast, divided into six regions: (I) Cantabrian, (II) Galician, (III) South Atlantic, (IV) Canary Islands, (V) Southern Mediterranean, and (VI) Northern Mediterranean. The results show that: (1) areas I and II are suitable for offshore wind, wave and biomass; (2) areas III and V are suitable for offshore wind, marine current and offshore solar; area IV is suitable for offshore wind, ocean wave and offshore solar; (3) and area VI is suitable for offshore wind, osmotic and offshore solar. This analysis can help politicians and technicians to plan the use of these resources in Spain.

1. Introduction

In recent years, there have been some social and political concerns about climate change and the high dependence on fossil fuels. In order to prevent a big problem, different climate and energy policies are being created to achieve environmental sustainability. Renewable energies are called to play an essential role in this process. The ocean has been an integral part of human civilization and its development for a long time. Although its potential use for power generation has been the object of different patents, only some technologies able of taking advantage of ocean energy resources are in a mature stage of development. This is a key point taking into account that oceans and seas have the potential to play an important role in the supply of clean and endless energy. Oceans and seas contain large quantities of energy potential. In fact, ocean energy resources are estimated with a potential of around 120,000 TWh/year, enough to satisfy more that 400% of the current global demand for electricity.
The great potential shown by ocean energies is due in part to the huge ranges of possibilities: wave, tidal, marine currents, ocean thermal, and osmotic (salinity gradient) energies. In addition to these ones, it is essential to take into account those created in a first moment for onshore locations, and later thought for sites in the sea: wind and solar (onshore on land and offshore on sea), geothermal and biomass. Nowadays, there are some barriers to achieve an adequate development of that sector [1]. These barriers are mainly: the state of the technology with a lot of important challenges both in the short and medium term, the high capital cost in the first project of each technology, the lack of experience and environmental aspects, etc. These barriers are smaller or larger depending on each of the oceanic technologies and its current development stage.
In recent years, this industry has seen encouraging signs, with some of the technologies showing significant progress. This is the case for offshore wind and tidal energy, which can be considered mature enough to be ready for their commercial development. Regardless, other technologies follow a slower learning curve. Based on this, the forecasts in the short, medium, and long term are not ambitious at all [2]. With the objective of promoting the sector, various initiatives have emerged to take advantage of its energetic potential. One of them is the Implementation Agreement of Oceanic Energy Systems (IEA-OES), which aims to have installed 337 GW of capacity worldwide in 2050, objective difficult to be achieved with current figures.
Another key aspect in the development of this type of project is the Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE) [3]. LCOE value is very high in the case of prototype projects, having a lot of room for improvement. It is important to take into account that the energy generated must have a competitive cost [4]. On the other hand, the use of green energy has other benefits. In fact, governments must support this type of project with some incentives to help the companies involved, above all in the early stages of the development of those technologies. On the other hand, a better perception of the citizens about marine renewable energy is essential, because nowadays there is a great ignorance of the possibilities of the ocean to offer clean and endless energy. A high percentage of citizens only know their disadvantages.
In Spain, the case is not different, and the commitments on renewable energy must be achieved. Although the development of onshore facilities is not negligible at all, offshore ones have not yet been developed except with R&D projects, patents and prototypes. So, the road ahead is huge in this area. For that, it is essential to know the available resource. A lot of studies have been carried out to estimate it, but mainly focused on one category, for instance, offshore wind or wave power. There are some examples of these studies focused on different areas in the world: one of themis about the analysis of methodologies for the assessment of wind resource in European Seas [5]; another one is only focused in offshore wind around Korean peninsula [6]; another one is about wave energy along the Cornish coast (UK) [7]; another one analyzes the renewable mix to satisfy the needs of energy of Pantelleria, a real island in the Mediterranean Sea, focusing on starting to study minor island, including the study of different renewable sources: wind, solar and wave [8]; another one studies the possible energy independence in Malta based on the use of Wave Energy Converters [9]; another one is about wave energy resource variation in the coast of Ireland [10]; and another one analyzes the influence of air density changes in the offshore wind potential over Northeastern Scotland [11].
Furthermore, there are some resource analyses in Spain: one of them determines the wave energy resource in the Estaca de Bares area (Spain) [12]; another one includes the evaluation of wave energy potential in the Spanish coast [13]; another one is about a review of combined wave and offshore wind energy [14]; another one is focused in wave energy in Menorca (Spain) [15]; another one is related to wave energy trends and its variation, and is very important to be taken into account in the Bay of Biscay [16]; and another one is about seasonal corrections due to the use of real values of air density for the assessment of offshore wind energy potential in the Iberian Peninsula [17].
Regarding wave energy, it is can be stated that UK and Spain are pioneering countries. In Spain, some Wave Energy Converters (WEC) were installed in Mutriku breakwater, and this facility is in operation [18,19,20].
Some investigations used different algorithms that included an importance sampling-based expectation-maximization algorithm for sequence detection in a single-photon avalanche diode underwater optical wireless communication [21]. Other studies are focused on water desalination applied to Sicilia with the objective of solving the problem in water supply for areas with a chronic debt of water [22]. In other cases, the researchers analyze energy saving in public transport using hydrogen produced by renewable sources instead of fossil fuels [23].
The main objective of this review paper is to analyze the marine renewable energy resource in the Spanish coast, based on a preliminary and prospective analysis of the possibilities of applying the different types of energies that can be exploited at the sea in the different areas of the Spanish coast. This review gives approximate numbers. If an accuracy number is looked in a specific area, it will be necessary to carry out a detailed analysis in that area. Marine renewable energies are included in the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), especially in the SDG-7 (Affordable and Clean Energy, with the objective of ensuring access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all), and in the SDG-14 (Life below Water, with the aim of conserving and sustainable using the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable development).
To achieve the abovementioned objective, the first step of the work is based on the need of using renewable energies, in this case marine energies, to achieve a reduction on the polluting gases in the atmosphere. For this, it is essential to carry out an exhaustive search of information about the state of the art of marine energies, the potential and the forecast at short, medium and long term, etc. This is done for all the types of renewable energies to be harnessed in seas and oceans: offshore wind, wave, tidal, marine currents, ocean thermal, osmotic (salinity gradient), solar, geothermal and biomass.
The state-of-the-art is necessary to address the next parts of the work, consisting of carrying out a detailed study and analysis of the potential of marine energies firstly in the world based on a review study, and later along the Spanish coast. For this, the Spanish coast is divided into six different areas: (I) Cantabrian coast, (II) Galician coast, (III) South Atlantic coast, (IV) Canary Islands coast, (V) Southern Mediterranean coast, and (VI) Northern Mediterranean coast. The energy potential associated to each area is indicated. So, optimal areas for each type of marine energy are identified.
This paper gives the basis to achieve the established objectives for the installation of renewable energies in Spain, in the sense of incorporating marine energies, which have been left aside until now in the country. In Spain, it has mainly only been carried out theoretical studies, tests in laboratory and some prototypes.

2. Marine Energy Resource in the World: State-Of-The-Art

A review of energy resource to be exploited in the sea around the world is summarized in this section. The order followed related to the different type of marine energies is: (1) offshore wind, (2) wave, (3) tidal, (4) marine currents, (5) ocean thermal, (6) osmotic, (7) biomass, (8) geothermal and (9) solar. To end this section, LCOE figures are discussed.
There are some specific studies that focus on one or more types of marine renewable energies. Regardless, there is no research that includes all the information of all the above-mentioned types together. On the other hand, there are some specific studies for some countries and some of the types of the abovementioned energies, but not including all the countries and all the types. This can be seen with some examples: wave [24], tidal, ocean thermal, ocean current and salinity gradient in Iran, wave energy in Asia [25], wave energy in the Mediterranean Sea [26], wave energy in Baltic Sea [27], offshore wind energy in UK [28], among others.

2.1. Offshore Wind Energy

Offshore wind is similar to onshore wind with some important changes in the protection of all the components against the aggressive marine environment, and with higher costs due to the difficulties related to the construction and operation in the sea [29]. The main parameter to analyze the wind resource is the average wind speed at the hub height [30]. This is the first value to be analyzed when identifying potential sites for wind facilities. For more detailed studies of wind resource assessment, other aspects must be considered, as the variability in the time and the horizontal and vertical space, wind direction, turbulence intensity, etc. The wind turbine generator model selected influences clearly when calculating the gross and net production of the facility.
World wind potential, including onshore and offshore, is estimated about 20,000–50,000 TWh/year, representing offshore wind more than 70% of those figures [31]. Figure 1 shows the annual average wind speed of offshore wind at 90 m high, obtained using NOAA’s Blended Sea Winds global offshore wind dataset. That dataset included wind stresses and vector winds on the ocean surface, with a grid of 0.25°, and with different time resolutions: monthly, daily and 6-h. It includes data from 1986 until 2006 [32]. Wind speeds represented in Figure 1 were generated from via satellite observations and in-situ sensors. The direction was a combination of the products of National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) and European Center for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF). The use of both products together has gaps for obtaining wind speed values. Some complex algorithms were created to fill those gaps, and there are some numerous research groups trying to continue improving those results [33,34].

2.2. Wave Energy

Wave energy is a great potential marine renewable energy. Different studies trying to determine the wave energy potential have been carried out in the world. There are some of those studies focused on specific countries, and even in specific areas within a country [35]. It is important to differentiate between wave energy potential, expressed in kW/m or kWh/year units, and wave energy production, only in kWh/year unit. The wave energy potential is the existing energy to be harnessed in a specific location. The wave energy production is the produced energy in the site using a specific wave energy converter [36].
For wave energy potential estimation, the only parameters to be taken into account are the average wave climate, including the combination of significant wave heights and peak wave periods. Knowing the wave spectrum type to be considered (JONSWAP, TMA, Pierson-Moskowitz, etc. [37]), it is easy to obtain the wave potential in a location. Characteristics of wave energy converters must be considered: minimum and maximum depth of the site, way of energy extraction, matrix power, etc. With all those data, the wave energy production (kWh/year) can be calculated [38].
According to International Energy Agency (IEA) estimations, the wave energy potential can oscillate between 8000 and 80,000 TWh/year [39]. Figure 2 shows the wave power distribution in the world. It is not homogeneous, with some areas characterized by more than 100 kW/m, and some of them below 10 kW/m [38].
Figure 2 is based on Mork et al. [40]. The global wave power dataset used was the default calibrated wave data set included in WorldWaves. WorldWaves included model data for the period between 1997 and 2006, a 10-year period, with 6-h frequencies and 0.5° grid, calibrated and validated with global TOPEX and JASON altimeter wind speed and wave height data. The calibration includes the consideration of some wave buoy records.

2.3. Tidal Energy

Tidal energy is caused by the gravitational attraction generated by the Moon and the Sun. Those gravitational forces are responsible for causing the ascent and descent movement of the seal level. Those movements are described by a wave with a period between 12 and 24 h. It is known as astronomical tides [43]. The tidal range associated with the astronomical tide is different throughout the planet, with places where the tidal range can be neglected and with locations where it exceeds 10 m [44]. Although astronomical tides are subject to general conditions, they may be affected by local conditions, such as wave reflection, the depths of the seabed, the shape of the coast, the existence of river mouths, resonance effects, etc.
The energy generated by the tides has been estimated around 26,000 TWh/year [39]. Ocean tidal ranges can be determined based on harmonic analysis using the formula included in Figure 3, where O1 and K1 are diurnal tidal constituents, M2 and S2 are semidiurnal tidal constituents, MHWS is mean high-water springs and MLWS is mean low water springs. The tidal range is expressed in meters. Tides can be exploited in two different ways. The first of these ways consists of the construction of dams, which serve as a barrier to maintain water at different levels on both sides of the dam, so that through turbines they can take advantage of the kinetic energy derived from the abovementioned difference in levels. The second way takes advantage of the speed of currents due to differences in sea level without the need of building dams. This process is similar to the use of the energy of ocean currents, and in fact some ocean currents harnessed are tidal currents.
To be able to produce electricity based on tidal dams, the location has to provide a tidal range greater than 5 m [43,45,46]. This strict condition reduces the number of viable sites for the use of tidal energy, as it can be observed in Figure 3.

2.4. Marine Current Energy

Ocean currents are due to a mix of periodic and aperiodic water movements. There are seasonal and short duration changes, and a lot of oscillatory and sporadic movements superimposed to the general oceanic circulation. Current observation is a very complex challenge [48]. The origin cause of marine currents is mainly the difference of temperature, salinity, etc. adding to them the influence of the wind, tides, Earth rotation, etc. [49,50,51].
Generally, the most intense marine currents are caused by the effect of the wind and the tides. In case of being due to tides, it is usual to name it a tidal stream. Tidal stream is the most harnessed marine current energy type at the moment. Therefore, this paper is going to be focused on tidal stream when marine current energy is mentioned.
Focusing on tidal stream, the bathymetry can also help to produce a remarkable increase in its characteristics, mainly in narrowing areas with a consequent velocity increase [52,53]. The energy capacity of this renewable energy source is high, estimated around 800 TWh/year [39]. This potential can be increased if it could be taken advantage of not only tidal currents. The speed of currents has to be greater than 2 m/s for the harnessing of this type of energy [54].

2.5. Ocean Thermal Energy

Ocean thermal energy is generated as a consequence of a process that begins with the incidence of solar rays on the sea, increasing its temperature [55]. Sea water allows the rays to penetrate through its surface, being able to increase the temperature of lower layers of sea water. The penetration will depend, among others, on the water turbidity state. In lower layers the radiation decreases and, therefore, the temperature decreases. This has as a consequence a vertical distribution of temperatures. In fact, this can also be explained as solar energy which is stored as heat in the surface layer of the ocean, and that heat is distributed to water depths around 100 m due to the waves and surface currents. Cold water is found deeper due to its higher density, and this different mass of water is moved by ocean currents. In the world, the temperature difference is between 10 and 25 °C, with the maximum values close to the Equator [56].
The vertical distribution is marked by two areas with a big change in the temperature between them. The temperature difference between the marine surface and one thousand meters depth in a specific location can allow energy production. This is known as ocean thermal energy. The harvesting of this type of energy is based on the difference between deep cold water and warm surface water; this allows running a heat engine to produce electricity. The mechanism consists of the shallow ocean water heat a liquid in the engine characterized by having a low boiling point. The liquid turns into vapor and it moves a turbine. This vapor cools with the deep water, restarting the generation cycle.
To have a profitable project, the difference in temperature must be at least 20 °C. This condition limits the possibilities of finding a suitable location for ocean thermal energy facilities. The most interesting ones are those located in equatorial and subtropical areas, where the minimum temperature on the surface is around 24 °C and temperatures at depths around one thousand meters are usually around 5 °C. The estimate for ocean thermal energy resource around the world is between 30,000 and 90,000 TWh/year, being usable around 10,000 TWh/year [39]. Figure 4 shows the temperature difference in degrees along the Earth.

2.6. Osmotic Energy

Osmotic energy is based on the difference that occurs in the osmotic pressure due to the difference in salinity between fresh water versus saltwater [57]. This process occurs when the two fluids come into contact causing a balance in the concentration of salt between them. It is essential that the facilities are located in river mouths looking for the salinity difference [58]. However, the mouths of rivers can present limitations for the installation of this type of facility due to possible conflicts with other uses or activities usually developed in the rivers’ mouth.
The energy potential is estimated about 2000 TWh/year [31]. Figure 5 shows salinity concentration in seas and oceans around the world, with greater salinity concentration in places like the Mediterranean Sea, and less salinity concentration in the Arctic Ocean.

2.7. Biomass Energy

Biomass can be defined as the entire living mass of both animal and vegetal origin existing on the Earth. Most of the biomass can be burned for energy production, in the form of heat, electricity or fuel through different types of treatments [59]. With regard to the biomass in the sea, algae are used to obtain biofuels, based on their function of using the sun energy to transform carbon dioxide, water and organic nutrients into oxygen and vegetable biomass [60]. These have microbes constituting 90% of the biomass, which gives them a lot of energy. It favors its conversion into various biofuels thanks to its low energy density.
Two types of algae can be differentiated: the microalgae from the aquatic systems and the larger algae known as macro algae that grow attached to stable substrates coming mainly from the seabed. Although microalgae have been studied in recent years for biodiesel production, marine macroalgae have awakened recently a great interest for obtaining different biofuels due to its chemical composition and ability to produce large biomass. Macroalgae have important advantages as a source of biofuels [61], if it is compared to other raw materials. They have a higher growth than other plants used until now, and its large-scale cultivation is feasible, profitable and it does not occupy land or require fresh water [62].
The exploitation of this type of cultivation areas is currently very limited. There are around 300,000 hectares of cultivation in the world, which represent more than 90% of global production, estimated at 24.9 million tons. The International Federation of Aquaculture (FAO) indicated that the production of macroalgae increases by 6% every year [63]. Figure 6 shows the natural distribution of macroalgae in shallow waters, and the capacity of coastal areas for biogas and the percentage of local Net Primary Productivity (NPP).

2.8. Geothermal Energy

Underwater geothermal energy is based on the existence of deep cracks in the seabed generated by divergent movements of the plates. These movements produce cracks, allowing vertical transfer of the magmatic heat from the mantle to the floor of the ocean. The sea cold water, when coming into contact with these cracks, warms up and chemically changes, producing hot water enriched with hydrogen sulfide expelled through the cracks produced by the movements of the plates, and known as hydrothermal vents. The hot water can be expelled up to 400 °C, getting a high heat flow for its transformation into electrical energy.
Different studies were carried out to analyze the scope of hydrothermal ventilations along the Earth’s crust. There are around 65,000 km of oceanic ridges, representing 30% of all the heat released in the Earth, of which a significant number of ventilations have been obtained hydrothermal vents located at depths greater than 2000 m (Figure 7). They are usually found in the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans, although there are some cases in the Mediterranean Sea and in the Indian Ocean. Only 13,000 km of the existing ocean ridges have been explored up to the moment, and only around 3900 km (about 30% of the surface explored) have good skills to be exploited.
Marine geothermal energy has a very high potential, but hardly quantifiable, since at present there is no defined system that allows knowing the real and usable potential of this source. This is because the state of technological development is not very mature. There are some estimates, considering only the explored areas, indicating that more than 1000 GW can be extracted [65,66].

2.9. Solar Energy

Solar energy can be used for electricity production by direct conversion of solar radiation into electric current passing through solar or photovoltaic cells. Its implementation to date has been done mainly onshore, but some companies in the sector have developed some designs with the objective of being able to take advantage of this energy in the surface of seas and oceans [67]. Maritime surface represents more than 70% of the global surface of the earth. Figure 8 shows the solar radiation marine great potential, with around 18 TWe only in the black points.
As an outline of the state of this technology, Figure 9 shows a summary of the power installed in 2015 and the forecasts for 2020 and 2030, focused on Europe considering: (a) waves, currents and tides, (b) offshore wind, (c) onshore solar, and (d) offshore wind.

2.10. Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE) Data

For investments decision-making, energy industry uses economical models to determine and compare the energy cost of different technologies. The most known one is the levelized cost of power (LCOE). It depends on capital, operating and fuel costs. The value of LCOE is obtained by dividing the sum of costs over lifetime by the sum of electrical energy produced over lifetime. It is important to take into account that most of renewable technologies are capital intensive but have low operational costs, while fossil fuel-based technologies may be cheaper to construct but much more expensive to operate.
Anyway, it is important to clarify that LCOE values are more reliable when there are a lot of installed facilities in a specific technology. So, the existing and reliable current LCOE data (median values) are given for offshore wind: 0.1434 $/kWh, for wave: 0.3263 $/kWh, for tidal and marine currents together: 0.3263 $/kWh. The rest of technologies included in the paper have not a reliable LCOE value. On the other hand, it is recommended to know LCOE values of other onshore renewable technologies: 0.0777 $/kWh in onshore wind, 0.1320 $/kWh in solar photovoltaic, 0.2466 $/kWh in solar thermal, 0.0479 $/kWh in hydropower, 0.0951 $/kWh in biomass, 0.0635 $/kWh in geothermal [69]. Although there are many uncertainties regarding the LCOE values in the medium term, it is expected that they will stabilize and even decrease as the learning curve progresses.

3. Practical Application: Marine Energy Resource in the Spanish Coast

Spain has a larger potential of marine energies as has been indicated by Montoya et al. [70], mainly focusing that work on onshore renewable energies, including a brief section about marine energies. The Spanish coast has more than 7800 km; the culture and the economy are very linked to the ocean in coastal areas. The study and exploitation of marine renewable energies are destined to play an essential role in the medium term. Many investigations have been carried out in the field of marine renewable energies in last years; specialized technology centers and demonstration plants have been installed focused on advancing in this field, which will be essential to achieve progress and development. Based on the investigation and different tests and errors, it will be possible to reach the sufficient maturity of the installations of the use of marine renewable energies so that its commercial development is feasible.
Spain has a very heterogeneous coastline in terms of energy potential. It belongs to a peninsula (the Iberian Peninsula), connected in the Northeast with France. In addition, the Spanish territory also has two archipelagos of islands: The Canary and Balearic Islands. Canary Islands are located in the Atlantic Ocean, southwest of the Iberian Peninsula and close to the African coast. Balearic Islands are located in the Mediterranean Sea, east of the Iberian Peninsula. For this reason, the Spanish coast cannot be studied as a single area since a great mistake would be made. The best alternative to this situation is to zone this coast in areas with homogeneous energy characteristics. Therefore, this paper divides the Spanish coast into six different areas: (I) Cantabrian coast, (II) Galician coast, (III) South Atlantic coast, (IV) Canary Islands coast, (V) Southern Mediterranean coast, and (VI) Northern Mediterranean coast (Figure 10). Areas I, II, III, V and VI correspond to the Iberian Peninsula, with the Balearic Islands included in Area VI. Area IV refers to the Canary Islands.
As it is done in the previous section, the order followed for the analysis in this section is: (1) offshore wind, (2) wave, (3) tidal, (4) marine currents, (5) ocean thermal, (6) osmotic, (7) biomass, (8) geothermal and (9) solar. So, the different types of energy are evaluated in the six areas in which the Spanish coast is divided.

3.1. Offshore Wind Energy

Wind resource study is based on wind speed map from Spanish IDAE (“Instituto para la Diversificación y Ahorro de la Energía”, in Spanish language) covering a coastal strip of 24 nautical miles, and with the data of the annual average wind speed at 80 m high (Figure 11) [71].
This analysis considers next classification depending on the annual average wind speed:
  • Low: annual average wind speed lower than 6 m/s, in white.
  • Medium: Low: annual average wind speed between 6 and 7 m/s, in greenish.
  • Medium: High: annual average wind speed between 7 and 8 m/s, in yellow and orange.
  • High: annual average wind speed higher than 8 m/s, in pink and reddish tones.
The values of the annual average wind speed (m/s) are shown in Table 1 for all the areas previously defined, at different water depths (20, 50 and 100 m). The values were obtained after making the average of the annual speeds in different points of each specific zone that make up the different areas. In Cantabrian coast (Area I), specific zones defined are País Vasco, Asturias and Cantabria. In Galician coast (Area II), there is only one specific zone, Galicia. In South Atlantic coast (Area III), the specific zones are Huelva, Cádiz and Estrecho-Ceuta. In the Canary Islands coast (Area IV), there is only one specific zone, Canary Islands. In Southern Mediterranean coast (Area V), the specific zones are Málaga, Almería, Melilla and Murcia. In Northern Mediterranean coast (Area VI), the specific zones are Valencia, Cataluña and Islas Baleares (Balearic Islands).
As it is observed in Table 1, the most interesting zones for offshore wind facilities are Cádiz at 100 m depth and Estrecho-Ceuta at 50 and 100 m depth, both in Area III (South Atlantic coast) with more than 10 m/s of average wind speed at 80 m high.
Zones and areas with an average wind speed above 7 m/s are: Asturias at 50 and 100 m depth and Cantabria at 100 m depth, both in Area I (Cantabrian coast), Galicia at 50 and 100 m depth in Area II (Galician coast), Huelva at 50 and 100 m depth, Cádiz at 20, 50 and 100 m depth, and Estrecho-Ceuta at 50 and 100 m depth, the three ones in Area III (South Atlantic coast), Canary Island at 100 m depth in Area IV (Canary Island coast), and Málaga at 50 and 100 m depth, Almería at 20, 50 and 100 m depth, Melilla at 50 and 100 m depth and Murcia at 50 and 100 m depth the four ones in Area V (Southern Mediterranean coast). Area VI (Northern Mediterranean coast) has values below 7 m/s.

3.2. Wave Energy

To analyze the potential of wave energy on the Spanish coast, IHCantabria wave atlas is used [72,73]. It allows knowing the average wave potential in different locations of the Spanish coast (Figure 12). For the study of each area, IDAE annual mesh maps are used, allowing obtaining the detailed characteristics of the resource, both considering the power and direction of waves (Figure 13). Wave energy resource is studied for depths of 20, 50 and 100 m, and also for deep waters.
Based on Atlas data, Table 2 is prepared. It includes the values of the annual average wave power for different depths in kW/m for each area and specific zone inside each area. Input data are from IDAE through the GOW (Global Ocean Waves) database. The specific zones defined for each area are the same defined for the offshore wind energy in Section 3.1.
Analyzing previous results, the most interesting areas for harnessing the wave resource power, are:
  • Galician coast, the area with the greatest potential in Spain, with values maximum above 35 kW/m.
  • Cantabrian coast, with an average of maximum values around 30 kW/m.
  • Canary Island coast, with a potential higher than 10 kW/m, specifically on the northern facades if the islands.
The worst locations for wave energy facilities in the Spanish coast are: Murcia, Almería, Cataluña, Málaga, Valencia, Islas Baleares, Cádiz, Estrecho-Ceuta, Huelva and Melilla.

3.3. Tidal Energy

The resource of tidal energy is studied based on the data recorded in “Puertos del Estado” tidal gauges network [74], located in different coastal areas, mainly ports location.
Table 3 includes different aspects to be considered in the analysis: HAT (High astronomical tide), MHWS (Mean high water springs), MHWN (Mean high water neaps), MSL (Mean sea level), MLWN (Mean low water neaps), MLWS (Mean low water springs) and LAT (Lowest astronomical tide). LAT in all the cases is taken as the zero level of the harbor where the tidal gauge is located.
In Cantabrian coast (Area I), the zones defined are Bilbao, Cantabria and Gijón. In Galician coast (Area II), the zones are Ferrol, Coruña, Vilagarcía and Vigo. In South Atlantic coast (Area III), the zones are Huelva and Bonanza. In Canary Islands coast (Area IV), the zones are Lanzarote, Fuerteventura, Las Palmas, Tenerife, Gomera, La Palma and Hierro. In Southern Mediterranean coast (Area V), the zones are Málaga, Motril, Melilla and Almería. In Northern Mediterranean coast (Area VI), the zones are Gandía, Valencia, Barcelona and Ibiza.
Based on buoys data and current technical minimum criteria before mentioned, tidal range greater than 5 m, the construction of tidal range facilities is not viable in the Spanish coast.

3.4. Marine Currents Energy

To analyze the resource of the energy of marine currents along the Spanish coasts, a study is made with the values obtained in different buoys of “Puertos del Estado” [74], installed along the Spanish coast. Table 4 shows marine current speeds in each buoy, including maximum and average speeds between 2007 and 2016. This is the only information available about marine currents in Spain, so the analysis is based on it. Regardless, it will be interested to develop a measurement campaign to determine marine current speed along the water column.
In Cantabrian coast (Area I) the buoys are Bilbao-Vizcaya and Cabo de Peñas. In Galician coast (Area II), the buoys are Estaca de Bares, Villano-Sisargas and Cabo Villano. In South Atlantic coast (Area III), the buoy is Golfo de Cádiz. In Canary Islands coast (Area IV), the buoys are Gran Canaria and Tenerife. In Southern Mediterranean coast (Area V), the buoy is Cabo de Gata. In Northern Mediterranean coast (Area VI), the buoys are Cabo de Palos, Valencia, Tarragona and Dragonera.
The most interesting area for harnessing of marine current power in Spain is Gibraltar Straight, with average values above 1.5 m/s and maximum figures higher than 2.5 m/s. Table 4 show that there are only 9 maximum values above 100 cm/s: 128 cm/s (Estaca de Bares, year 2016), 127 cm/s (Cabo de Gata, year 2015), 125 cm/s (Cabo de Palos, 2015), 120 cm/s (Cabo de Palos, year 2012), 116 cm/s (Cabo de Gata, year 2016), 110 cm/s (Tenerife, year 2014), 108 cm/s (Valencia, year 2010), 101 cm/s (Villano-Sisargas, year 2015), 101 cm/s (Cabo de Gata, year 2012).

3.5. Ocean Thermal Energy

To analyze the resource of ocean thermal energy along the Spanish coast, a study of the values in “Puertos del Estado” buoys was performed [74]. The values of maximum, minimum and average temperatures are established for each buoy, considering data in the last 10 years. Table 5 includes this data for all the areas in the Spanish coast.
In Cantabrian coast (Area I), the buoys are Costera Bilbao, Pasajes, Gijón, Bilbao-Vizcaya and Cabo de Peñas. In Galician coast (Area II), the buoys are Estaca de Bares, Villano-Sisargas and Cabo Silleiro. In South Atlantic coast (Area III), the buoys are Golfo de Cádiz, Cádiz and Tarifa. In Canary Islands coast (Area IV), the buoys are Gran Canaria, Tenerife Sur and Tenerife. In Southern Mediterranean coast (Area V), the buoys are Málaga, Cabo de Gata and Melilla. In Northern Mediterranean coast (Area VI), the buoys are Cabo de Palos, Alicante, Valencia, Costera Valencia, Tarragona, Barcelona, Palamós, Dragonera and Capdevera.
Knowing that the minimum value of temperature in the surface it around 24 degrees, it can be stated that there are not sites in the Spanish coast suitable for taking advantage of this type of energy. This is also indicated in Figure 4, with temperature differences in deep and surface water below 20 degrees. Therefore, it is not viable to install a device for capturing ocean thermal energy in the Spanish coast.

3.6. Osmotic Energy

For osmotic energy study, the input data were several “Puertos del Estado” buoys [74], establishing maximum and average salinity concentration in the last 10 years (Table 6). In order for the use of this energy, it is necessary that the facilities are located close to river mouths so that this difference in salinity occurs.
In Cantabrian coast (Area I) the buoys are Bilbao-Vizcaya and Cabo de Peñas. In Galician coast (Area II), the buoys are Estaca de Bares, Villano-Sisargas and Cabo Silleiro. In South Atlantic coast (Area III), the buoy is Cádiz. In Canary Islands coast (Area IV), the buoys are Gran Canaria and Tenerife. In Southern Mediterranean coast (Area V), the buoy is Cabo de Gata. In Northern Mediterranean coast (Area VI), the buoys are Cabo de Palos, Valencia and Tarragona.
The most interesting areas for this type of energy are Catalonian and Valencia coast, with salinity concentration about 27 parts per thousand. Rivers with mouth in these areas are: Almanzora, Segura, Júcar, Turia or Guadalaviar, Mijares, Ebro, Llobregat, Ter and Fluviá.

3.7. Biomass Energy

In Spain the natural resources of the luminaria, a specific type of algae, are very limited. They are mainly on the Atlantic coast, specifically the northern area corresponding to Cantabrian and Galician coast. In the case of the Cantabrian coast, this resource has diminished its abundance in the last decade, and in some places it has disappeared. At present, it is abundant in some locations in Galicia.

3.8. Geothermal Energy

It can be concluded that Spain does not have hydrothermal vents along its coasts based on the analysis of the world map of submarine ventilation locations (Figure 7). Therefore, it is not possible to exploit this marine energy resource in the country.

3.9. Solar Energy

To analyze the resource of solar energy along the Spanish coast, the values of solar irradiation annual averages are established in each area, considering for that values between 1985 and 2005 (Figure 14).
Table 7 shows the average annual radiation in each area, and specific zones. In Cantabrian coast (Area I), the Zones are País Vasco, Cantabria and Asturias. In Galician coast (Area II), the only zone is Galicia. In South Atlantic coast (Area III), the zones are Huelva, Cádiz and Ceuta. In Canary Islands coast (Area IV), the only zone is Canary Island. In Southern Mediterranean coast (Area V), the zones are Málaga, Almería, Murcia and Melilla. In Northern Mediterranean coast (Area VI), the zones are Valencia, Cataluña and Baleares (Balearic Islands).
The most interesting areas for solar exploitation are:
  • The southern Atlantic coast and the southern Mediterranean coast with values above 5 kWh/m2day, representing the area with the highest radiation in the Spanish coast.
  • Canary Islands, specifically the southern facade with values above 4.50 kWh/m2day.
  • The northern Mediterranean coast, specifically in Valencia, Tarragona and the Balearic Islands, with values higher than 4.50 kWh/m2day.

4. Conclusions

The paper consists of a preliminary and prospective analysis of the possibilities of applying the different types of energies that can be exploited at sea in the Spanish coast. In case of looking for specifying the final numbers of a certain area of lesser extent a little better, it is clear that it will be necessary to carry out specific studies in the study area.
This section, which shows the main conclusions of this work, has been divided into the general ones and those related to the Spanish case of study.
Firstly, the general conclusions related to renewable energies to be exploited in the sea are the following:
  • Ocean energy resource, including other types of energies to be exploited in the sea, is huge, and there are different types of marine energies with an estimated theoretical potential, being able to satisfy the current electrical demand of the whole world.
  • However, given its state of evolution and its technological development, the use of this type of energies is very scarce. Offshore wind and tidal facilities present a higher degree of development. On the contrary, wave, marine current, ocean thermal, osmotic, biomass, geothermal and offshore solar energies are in an early phase of development.
  • The current installed power of ocean energy represents a very small percentage, in comparison with other sources of renewable energies. It will be necessary an important consolidation of the sector that allows increasing the installed capacity competing with sources of energy. This is not expected to happen in the short term, except in the case of offshore wind energy.
Finally, the main conclusions related to the specific case of study focused on the Spanish coast are shown next:
  • Currently in Spain, the marine energy sector has a very poor role in the energy mix. This may be due to the great economic crisis suffered by the country in recent years, with the consequent reduction of investments in the renewable energy sector and especially in the marine sector.
  • In order to ensure that energies to be exploited in the sea can play a fundamental role in Spain, a great support will be needed from local and national administrations, with initiatives that allow for the correct development and growth of these types of energies.
  • The Spanish coast has good characteristics for the use of marine renewable energies, but not all of them. Feasible marine renewable energies on the Spanish coast are: offshore wind, ocean wave, osmotic, ocean currents, biomass and offshore solar.
  • The Spanish coast is divided in six different areas: (I) Cantabrian coast, (II) Galician coast, (III) South Atlantic coast, (IV) Canary Islands coast, (V) Southern Mediterranean coast, and (VI) Northern Mediterranean coast (Figure 10).
  • As a result of the analysis conducted in the present study, Areas I and II are suitable for offshore wind, wave and biomass. Areas III and V are suitable for offshore wind, marine current and offshore solar. Area IV is suitable for offshore wind, ocean wave an offshore solar, and Area VI is suitable for offshore wind, osmotic and offshore solar. This has been summarized in Figure 15.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.D.E. and J.-S.L.-G.: Methodology, V.N.; Investigation, J.M.E.; Resources, J.M.O.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, M.D.E.; Writing—Review & Editing, J.M.O.

Funding

This research was funded by the Agustín de Betancourt Foundation (FAB).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

ECMWFEuropean Center for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts.
FAOInternational Federation of Aquaculture.
GOWGlobal Ocean Waves.
HANPPHuman Apropriation of Net Primary Production.
HATHigh Astronomical Tide.
IDAEInstituto para la Diversificación y Ahorro de la Energía.
IEAInternational Energy Agency.
IEA-OESImplementation Agreement of Oceanic Energy Systems.
IHCantabriaInstituto de Hidráulica Ambiental de la Universidad de Cantabria.
JASONJoint Altimetry Satellite Oceanography Network.
JONSWAPJOint North Sea WAve Project.
K1diurnal tidal constituent.
LATLowest Astronomical Tide.
LCOELevelized Cost of Electricity.
M2semidiurnal tidal constituent.
MHWNMean High Water Neaps.
MHWSMean High Water Springs.
MLWNMean Low Water Neaps.
MLWSMean Low Water Springs.
MSLMean Sea Level.
NCEPNational Centers for Environmental Prediction.
NPPNet Primary Productivity.
NOAANational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
O1diurnal tidal constituent.
S2semidiurnal tidal constituent.
SDGSustainable Development Goal.
TMATexel-Mardsen-Arsloe.
TOPEXThe Ocean Topography Experiment.
WECWave Energy Converter.

References

  1. Esteban, M.D.; Diez, J.J.; López-Gutiérrez, J.S.; Negro, V. Integral Management Applied to Offshore Wind Farms. J. Coast. Res. 2009, 56, 1204–1208. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ocean Energy Europe. European Commission Issue Paper on Ocean Energy Industry Response; Technical Report; Ocean Energy Europe: Brussels, Belgium, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  3. Esteban, M.D.; Diez, J.J.; López-Gutiérrez, J.S.; Negro, V. Why Offshore Wind Energy? Renew. Energy 2011, 36, 444–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. IRENA. Ocean Energy Technology: Innovation, Patents, Market Status and Trends; Technical Report; IRENA: Abu Dhabi, UAE, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  5. Sempreviva, A.M.; Barthelmie, R.J.; Pryor, S.C. Review of Methodologies for Offshore Wind Resource Assessment in European Seas. Surv. Geophys. 2008, 29, 471–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Oh, K.; Kim, J.; Lee, J.; Ryu, K. Wind Resource Assessment Around Korean Peninsula for Feasibility Study on 100 MW Class Offshore Wind Farm. Renew. Energy 2012, 42, 217–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Van Nieuwkoop, J.C.C.; Smith, H.C.M.; Smith, G.H.; Johanning, L. Wave Resource Assessment Along the Cornish Coast (UK) from a 23-year Hindcast Dataset Validated Against Buoy Measurements. Renew. Energy 2013, 58, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Franzitta, V.; Rao, D.; Curto, D.; Viola, A. Greening Island: Renewable Energies Mix to Satisfy Electrical Needs of Pantelleria in Mediterranean Sea. In Proceedings of the Oceans 2016 MTS/IEEE, Monterey, CA, USA, 19–23 September 2016. [Google Scholar]
  9. Franzitta, V.; Curto, D.; Rao, D. Energetic Sustainability Using Renewable Energies in the Mediterranean Sea. Sustainability 2016, 8, 1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Penalba, M.; Ulazia, A.; Ibarra-Berastegi, G.; Ringwood, J.; Sáenz, J. Wave Energy Resource Variation off the West Coast of Ireland and its Impact on Realistic Wave Energy Converters’ Power Absortion. Appl. Energy 2018, 224, 205–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ulazia, A.; Nafarrate, A.; Ibarra-Berastegi, G.; Sáenz, J.; Carreno-Madinabeitia, S. The Consequences of Air Density Variations over Northeastern Scotland for Offshore Wind Energy Potential. Energies 2019, 12, 2635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Iglesias, G.; Carballo, R. Wave Energy Resource in the Estaca de Bares Area (Spain). Renew. Energy 2010, 35, 1574–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. López-Gutiérrez, J.S.; Esteban, M.D.; Negro, V. Wave Energy Potential Assessment and Feasibility Analysis of Wave Energy Converters. Case Study: Spanish Coast. J. Coast. Res. 2018, 85, 1291–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pérez-Collazo, C.; Greaves, D.; Iglesias, G. A Review of Combined Wave and Offshore Wind Energy. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 42, 141–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sierra, J.P.; Mösso, C.; González-Marco, D. Wave Energy Resource Assessment in Menorca (Spain). Renew. Energy 2014, 71, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ulazia, A.; Penalba, M.; Ibarra-Berastegi, G.; Ringwood, J.; Sáenz, J. Wave Energy Trends over the Bay of Biscay and the Consequences for Wave Energy Converters. Energy 2017, 141, 624–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ulazia, A.; Ibarra-Berastegi, G.; Sáenz, J.; Carreno-Madinabeitia, S.; González-Rojí, S.J. Seasonal Correction Owing to Use of Actual Air Density in Estimation of Offshore Wind Energy Potential: Case of the Iberian Peninsula. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ibarra-Berastegi, G.; Sáenz, J.; Ulazia, A.; Serras, P.; Esnaola, G.; García-Soto, C. Electricity Production, Capacity Factor, and Plant Efficiency Index at the Mutriku Wave Farm (2014–2016). Ocean Eng. 2018, 147, 20–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mustapa, M.A.; Yaakob, O.B.; Ahmed, Y.M.; Rheem, C.K.; Koh, K.K.; Adnan, F.A. Wave Energy Device and Breakwater Integration: A Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 77, 43–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. López, I.; Andreu, J.; Ceballos, S.; Martínez de Alegría, I.; Kortabarria, I. Review of Wave Energy Technologies and the Necessary Power Equipment. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 27, 413–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Huang, N.; Chen, M.; Xu, W.; Wang, J.W. Incorporating Importance Sampling in EM Learning for Sequence Detection in SPAD Underwater OWC. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 4529–4537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Viola, A.; Franzittia, V.; Trapanese, M.; Curto, D. Nexus Water & Energy: A case Study of Wave Energy Converters (WECs) to Desalination Applications in Sicily. Int. J. Heat Technol. 2016, 34, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  23. Franzitta, V.; Curto, D.; Milone, D.; Trapanese, M. Energy Saving in Public Transport Using Renewable Energy. Sustainability 2017, 9, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zabihian, F.; Fung, A.S. Review of Marine Renewable Energies: Case Study of Iran. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2011, 15, 2461–2474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Khojasteh, D.; Mahmood, S.; Glamore, W.; Iglesias, G. Wave Energy Status in Asia. Ocean Eng. 2018, 169, 344–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Besio, G.; Mentaschi, L.; Mazzino, A. Wave Energy Resource Assessment in the Mediterranean Sea on the Basis of a 35-year Hindcast. Energy 2016, 94, 50–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jakimavicius, D.; Kriauciuniene, J.; Sarauskiene, D. Assessment of Wave Climate and Energy Resources in the Baltic Sea Nearshore (Lithuanian Territorial Water). Oceanologia 2018, 60, 207–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cavazzi, S.; Dutton, A.G. An Offshore Wind Energy Geographic Information System (OWE-GIS) for Assessment of the UK’s Offshore Wind Energy Potential. Renew. Energy 2016, 87, 212–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kaldellis, J.K.; Apostolou, D.; Kapsali, M.; Kondili, E. Environmental and Social Footprint of Offshore Wind Energy. Comparison with Onshore Counterpart. Renew. Energy 2016, 92, 543–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mohammadzadeh, S.; Jalilinasrabady, S.; Fujii, H.; Farabi-Asl, H. A Comprehensive Approach for Wind Power Plant Potential Assessment, Application to Northwestern Iran. Energy 2018, 164, 344–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. European Wind Energy Association (EWEA). The European Offshore Wind Industry—Key Trends and Statistics 2014; Technical Report; European Wind Energy Association: Bruxelles, Belgium, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  32. Arent, D.; Sullivan, P.; Heimiller, D.; Lopez, A.; Eurek, K.; Badger, J.; Jorgensen, H.E.; Kelly, M. Improved Offshore Wind Resource Assessment in Global Climate Stabilization Scenarios; NREL Technical Report; NREL: Golden, CO, USA, 2012.
  33. Zhang, H.M.; Reynolds, R.W.; Bates, J.J. Blended and gridded high resolution global sea surface wind speed and climatology from multiple satellites: 1987–present. In Proceedings of the American Meteorological Society, Annual Meeting, Atlanta, GA, USA, 28 January–3 February 2006. [Google Scholar]
  34. European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Web Page. Available online: www.ecmwf.int (accessed on 10 January 2019).
  35. Iglesias, G.; Carballo, R. Offshore and Inshore Wave Energy Assessment: Asturias (N Spain). Energy 2010, 35, 1964–1972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Peter, J.; Frigaard, P.; Friis-Madsen, E.; Sorensen, H. Prototype Testing of the Wave Energy Converter Wave Dragon. Renew. Energy 2006, 31, 181–189. [Google Scholar]
  37. Kim, G.; Mu, W.; Soo, K.; Jun, K.; Eun, M. Offshore and Nearshore Wave Energy Assessment Around the Korean Peninsula. Energy 2011, 36, 1460–1469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Esteban, M.D.; López-Gutiérrez, J.S.; Negro, V.; Laviña, M.; Muñoz-Sánchez, P. A New Classification of Wave Energy Converters Used for Selection of Devices. J. Coast. Res. 2018, 85, 1.286–1.290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ocean Energy Systems Web Page. Available online: www.ocean-energy-systems.org (accessed on 12 January 2019).
  40. Mork, G.; Barstow Stephen, B.; Kabuth, A.; Pontes, M.T. Assesingthe Global Wave Enery Potential. In Proceedings of the OMAE 2010, 29th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Shanghai, China, 6–11 June 2010. [Google Scholar]
  41. IEA-OES (International Energy Agency—Ocean Energy Systems). Annual Report 2013; Technical Report; IEA-OES: Paris, France, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  42. OES (Ocean Energy Systems). An International Vision for Ocean Energy; Technical Report; OES: Porto, Portugal, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  43. Rourke, F.O.; Boyle, F.; Reynolds, A. Tidal Energy Update 2009. Appl. Energy 2010, 87, 398–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Water, S.; Aggidis, G. Tidal Range Technologies and State of the Art in Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 59, 514–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Baker, C. Tidal Power. Energy Policy 1991, 19, 792–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Lewis, M.J.; Angeloudis, A.; Robins, P.E.; Evans, P.S.; Neill, S.P. Influence of Storm Surge on Tidal Range Energy. Energy 2017, 122, 25–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. University of Graz Wegener Center for Climate and Global Change. Available online: https://wegc 203116.uni-graz.at/meted/oceans/tides_intro/print.htm (accessed on 11 January 2019).
  48. Neumann, D. Ocean Currents; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1968. [Google Scholar]
  49. Munk, W.H. On the Wind-driven Ocean Circulation. J. Meteorol. 1950, 7, 80–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Fofonoff, N.P.; Webster, F.; Deacon, E. A Discussion on Ocean Currents and Their Dynamics—Current Measurements in the Western Atlantic. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 1971, 270, 423–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Rintoul, S.R.; Hughes, C.W.; Olbers, D. Chapter 4.6. The Antarctic Circumpolar Current System. Int. Geophys. 2001, 77, 271–302. [Google Scholar]
  52. Bajah, A.S.; Myers, L.E. Fundamentals Applicable to the Utilization of Marine Current Turbines for Energy Production. Renew. Energy 2003, 28, 2205–2211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bryden, I.G.; Cough, S. ME1-Marine Energy Extraction: Tidal Resource Analysis. Renew. Energy 2006, 31, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lewis, A. Ocean Energy. In IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Resource Sources and Climate Change Mitigation; Edenhofer, O., Ed.; IPCC: Geneve, Switzerland, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  55. Etemadi, A.; Emdadi, A.; Asefafshar, O.; Emami, Y. Electricity Generation by the Ocean Thermal Energy. Energy Procedia 2011, 12, 936–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Von Jouanne, A.; Brekken, T.K.A. Ocean and Geothermal energy Systems. IEEE 2017, 99, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Gerstandt, K.; Peinemann, K.V.; Erik, S.; Thorsen, T.; Holt, T. Membrane Processes in Energy Supply for an Osmotic Power Plant. Desalination 2008, 224, 64–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Helfer, F.; Lemckert, C.; Anissimov, Y.G. Osmotic Power with Pressure Retarded Osmosis: Theory, Performance and Trends—A review. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 453, 337–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. McKendry, P. Energy Production from Biomass (part 1): Overview of Biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 2002, 83, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wei, N.; Quarterman, J.; Jin, Y.S. Marine Macroalgae: An Untapped Resource for Producing Fuels and Chemicals. Trends Biotechnol. 2013, 31, 70–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ross, A.B.; Jones, J.M.; Kubacki, M.L.; Bridgeman, T. Classification of Macroalgae as Fuel and its Thermochemical Behaviour. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 6494–6504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Peteiro, C.; García-Tasende, M. Uso y Cultivo de Laminarias, las Grandes Algas Marinas. Investig. Y Cienc. 2015, 466, 8–9. [Google Scholar]
  63. FAO. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; Technical Report; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  64. Hughes, A.D.; Kelly, M.; Black, K.D.; Suzanne-Stanley, M. Biogas from Macroalgae: Is It Time to Revisit the Idea? Biotechnol. Biofuels 2012, 5, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Wikipedia. Available online: www.wikipedia.org (accessed on 15 June 2019).
  66. Hiriart, G.; Prol-Ledesma, R.M.; Alcocer, S.; Espindola, S. Submarine Geothermics; Hydrothermal Vents and Electricity Generation. In Proceedings of the World Geotechnical Congress, Bali, Indonesia, 25–29 April 2010. [Google Scholar]
  67. Sahu, A.; Yadav, N.; Sudhakar, K. Floating Photovoltaic Power Plant: A Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 66, 815–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ez 2c Web Page. Available online: www.ez 2c.de/ml/solar_land_area/ (accessed on 10 January 2019).
  69. Tran, T.T.D.; Smith, A.D. Incorporating Performance-based Global Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis into LCOE Calculations for Emerging Renewable Energy Technologies. Appl. Energy 2018, 2016, 157–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Montoya, F.G.; Aguilera, M.J.; Manzano-Agugliaro, F. Renewable Energy Production in Spain: A Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 33, 509–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. IDAE Web Page. Available online: www.atlaseolicoidae.es (accessed on 11 January 2019).
  72. IHCantabria Web Page. Available online: www.ihcantabria.com (accessed on 14 January 2019).
  73. IDAE. Evaluación del Potencial de la Energía de las Olas; Technical Report; IDAE: Madrid, Spain, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  74. Puertos del Estado Web Page. Available online: www.puertos.es (accessed on 15 January 2019).
  75. Aemet Web Page. Available online: www.aemet.com (accessed on 16 January 2019).
Figure 1. Annual average wind speed, in m/s, at 90 m high (Reproduced with permission from [34]. European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, 2019).
Figure 1. Annual average wind speed, in m/s, at 90 m high (Reproduced with permission from [34]. European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, 2019).
Jmse 07 00249 g001
Figure 2. Wave power distribution, in kW/m (Reproduced with permission from [41,42]. International Energy Agency—Ocean Energy Systems, 2014, 2011).
Figure 2. Wave power distribution, in kW/m (Reproduced with permission from [41,42]. International Energy Agency—Ocean Energy Systems, 2014, 2011).
Jmse 07 00249 g002
Figure 3. Tidal range, in m, around the world (Reproduced with permission from [47]. University of Graz Wegener Center for Climate and Global Change, 2019).
Figure 3. Tidal range, in m, around the world (Reproduced with permission from [47]. University of Graz Wegener Center for Climate and Global Change, 2019).
Jmse 07 00249 g003
Figure 4. Ocean thermal energy: difference of temperatures, in degrees (Reproduced with permission from [42]. Ocean Energy Systems, 2011).
Figure 4. Ocean thermal energy: difference of temperatures, in degrees (Reproduced with permission from [42]. Ocean Energy Systems, 2011).
Jmse 07 00249 g004
Figure 5. Salinity concentration in the world (Reproduced with permission from [42]. Ocean Energy Systems, 2011).
Figure 5. Salinity concentration in the world (Reproduced with permission from [42]. Ocean Energy Systems, 2011).
Jmse 07 00249 g005
Figure 6. Natural distribution of macroalgae in shallow waters and the capacity of coastal areas for biogas and the percentage of local Net Primary Productivity (NPP). HANPP is Human Appropriation of Net Primary Production (Reproduced with permission from [64]. BioMed Central Ltd., 2012).
Figure 6. Natural distribution of macroalgae in shallow waters and the capacity of coastal areas for biogas and the percentage of local Net Primary Productivity (NPP). HANPP is Human Appropriation of Net Primary Production (Reproduced with permission from [64]. BioMed Central Ltd., 2012).
Jmse 07 00249 g006
Figure 7. Submarine ventilation around the Earth [65].
Figure 7. Submarine ventilation around the Earth [65].
Jmse 07 00249 g007
Figure 8. Distribution of solar radiation in the world (Reproduced with permission from [68]. Matthias Loster, 2010).
Figure 8. Distribution of solar radiation in the world (Reproduced with permission from [68]. Matthias Loster, 2010).
Jmse 07 00249 g008
Figure 9. Global view of onshore and offshore renewable facilities in Europe: installed power, in GW, in 2015, and forecasts for 2020 and 2030.
Figure 9. Global view of onshore and offshore renewable facilities in Europe: installed power, in GW, in 2015, and forecasts for 2020 and 2030.
Jmse 07 00249 g009
Figure 10. Zoning created for the study of marine renewable resource in the Spanish coast.
Figure 10. Zoning created for the study of marine renewable resource in the Spanish coast.
Jmse 07 00249 g010
Figure 11. Map with the annual average wind speed, in m/s, at 80 m high (Reproduced with permission from [71]. IDEA, 2019).
Figure 11. Map with the annual average wind speed, in m/s, at 80 m high (Reproduced with permission from [71]. IDEA, 2019).
Jmse 07 00249 g011
Figure 12. Annual average wave power, in kW/m: (a) in the Iberian Peninsula and (b) Canary Island coast (Reproduced with permission from [72]. IHCantabria, 2019).
Figure 12. Annual average wave power, in kW/m: (a) in the Iberian Peninsula and (b) Canary Island coast (Reproduced with permission from [72]. IHCantabria, 2019).
Jmse 07 00249 g012aJmse 07 00249 g012b
Figure 13. Annual average wave power, in kW/m, in the west part of the Area I (Cantabrian coast) (Reproduced with permission from [73]. IDEA, 2019).
Figure 13. Annual average wave power, in kW/m, in the west part of the Area I (Cantabrian coast) (Reproduced with permission from [73]. IDEA, 2019).
Jmse 07 00249 g013
Figure 14. Radiation solar map: (a) Iberian Peninsula and (b) Canary Island. The values in the color bars are the average annual radiation solar, in kWh/m2day (Reproduced with permission from [75]. Aemet, 2019).
Figure 14. Radiation solar map: (a) Iberian Peninsula and (b) Canary Island. The values in the color bars are the average annual radiation solar, in kWh/m2day (Reproduced with permission from [75]. Aemet, 2019).
Jmse 07 00249 g014aJmse 07 00249 g014b
Figure 15. Summary of the feasibility study of the different types of marine renewable energies in the Spanish coast.
Figure 15. Summary of the feasibility study of the different types of marine renewable energies in the Spanish coast.
Jmse 07 00249 g015
Table 1. Annual average wind speed, in m/s, in all the areas in the Spanish coast.
Table 1. Annual average wind speed, in m/s, in all the areas in the Spanish coast.
AreaSpecific Zone20 m Depth50 m Depth100 m Depth
(I) Cantabrian CoastPaís Vasco6.0–6.5 6.5–7.06.5–7.0
Asturias6.0–6.57.0–7.57.5–8.0
Cantabria6.0–6.56.5–7.07.0–7.5
(II) Galician CoastGalicia6.5–7.07.0–7.58.0–8.5
(III) South Atlantic CoastHuelva6.5–7.07.0–7.57.5–8.0
Cádiz8.0–8.58.5–9.0>10.0
Estrecho-Ceuta8.5–9.0>10.0>10.0
(IV) Canary Islands CoastCanary Island6.0–6.56.5–7.07.0–7.5
(V) Southern Mediterranean CoastMálaga6.5–7.07.0–7.57.0–7.5
Almería7.5–8.08.0–8.58.5–9.0
Melilla6.5–7.07.0–7.57.5–8.0
Murcia6.5–7.07.0–7.57.0–7.5
(VI) Northern Mediterranean CoastValencia5.5–6.05.5–6.05.5–6.0
Cataluña5.5–6.06.0–6.56.5–7.0
Islas Baleares6.0–6.56.5–7.06.5–7.0
Table 2. Annual average wave power, in kW/m, in all the areas in the Spanish coast.
Table 2. Annual average wave power, in kW/m, in all the areas in the Spanish coast.
AreaSpecific Zone20 m Depth50 m Depth100 m DepthDeep Waters
(I) Cantabrian coastPaís Vasco12.20 12.1819.8926.68
Cantabria14.9418.9822.9430.97
Asturias13.5517.4821.5135.14
(II) Galician coastGalicia17.0825.2130.2637.97
(III) South Atlantic coastHuelva2.533.063.424.50
Cádiz2.212.873.023.85
Estrecho-Ceuta2.372.943.244.31
(IV) Canary Islands coastCanary Island7.538.949.7013.59
(V) Southern Mediterranean coastMálaga1.632.042.523.11
Almería1.341.822.242.96
Melilla3.203.504.655.40
Murcia1.071.432.253.08
(VI) Northern Mediterranean coastValencia1.702.302.862.96
Cataluña1.622.263.134.17
Islas Baleares2.013.634.565.11
Table 3. Tidal data, in cm, in all the areas in the Spanish coast.
Table 3. Tidal data, in cm, in all the areas in the Spanish coast.
AreaZoneHATMHWSMHWNMSLMLWNMLWSLAT
(I) Cantabrian coastBilbao476432314237156400
Cantabria526480362286205900
Gijón509468350274195840
(II) Galician coastFerrol439499285217147400
Coruña493453342273202980
Vilagarcía431394284220153500
Vigo416379272207141410
(III) South Atlantic coastHuelva404363264203145470
Bonanza359323227173114460
(IV) Canary Islands coastLanzarote347311226179132540
Fuerteventura314278196152109330
Las Palmas311278199158116430
Tenerife295262188150111440
Gomera24822115712798370
La Palma278245175142107450
El Hierro285253186158129670
(V) Southern Mediterranean coastMálaga105--61--0
Motril95--57--0
Melilla64--32--
Almería66--40--0
(VI) Northern Mediterranean coastGandía19--2--0
Valencia30--12--0
Barcelona50--29--0
Ibiza52--36--0
Table 4. Marine current speed, in cm/s, in all the areas in the Spanish coast between 2007 and 2016.
Table 4. Marine current speed, in cm/s, in all the areas in the Spanish coast between 2007 and 2016.
AreaBuoy 2007200820092010201120122013201420152016
(I) Cantabrian coastBilbao-VizcayaMax61545383558183896381
Min22152425212331272825
Cabo de PeñasMax70615376937570606483
Min22131924262720212331
(II) Galician coastEstaca de BaresMax535655575855506277128
Min20181722191618191947
Villano-SisargasMax606369688163958310182
Min22202327282227302932
Cabo VillanoMax62425668645696626999
Min19161925172435252144
(III) South Atlantic coastGolfo de CádizMax79536460487497617370
Min30212627222637302429
(IV) Canary Islands coastGran CanariaMax69566654497496848466
Min27202421212640312420
TenerifeMax715964616387801107360
Min23182115182325261416
(V) Southern Mediterranean coastCabo de GataMax89938386861017980127116
Min33352942405135282835
(VI) Northern Mediterranean coastCabo de PalosMax5567647459120968112581
Min21252027225246452644
Valencia Max415647108635947625763
Min15181519151713172524
TarragonaMax70567771697369639778
Min27212834403230263942
DragoneraMax--7669799270588973
Min--2422353327253432
Table 5. Temperature data, in degrees, in “Puertos del Estado” buoys, in all the areas in the Spanish coast.
Table 5. Temperature data, in degrees, in “Puertos del Estado” buoys, in all the areas in the Spanish coast.
AreaBuoyMaximum TemperatureMinimum TemperatureAverage Temperature
(I) Cantabrian coastCostera Bilbao15.8113.9114.86
Pasajes16.3514.4215.38
Gijón16.2114.0315.12
Bilbao-Vizcaya16.6714,3715.52
Cabo de Peñas15.8913.8714.88
(II) Galician coastEstaca de Bares16.5214.7915.65
Villano-Sisargas16.9414.0915.51
Cabo Silleiro15.5014.4314.96
(III) South Atlantic coastGolfo de Cádiz19.7616.5518.15
Cádiz18.9215.7117.31
Tarifa18.4115.2516.83
(IV) Canary Islands coastGran Canaria21.9520.2221.08
Tenerife Sur22.6720.5921.63
Tenerife22.7820.8721.82
(V) Southern Mediterranean coastMálaga19.6015.3117.45
Cabo de Gata19.0216.0117.51
Melilla20.0316.9418.48
(VI) Northern Mediterranean coastCabo de Palos19.1616.3517.75
Alicante18.8616.4717.67
Valencia17.7515.4516.60
Costera Valencia17.3414.9016.03
Tarragona17.2514.6715.96
Barcelona17.6115.2316.42
Palamós17.0414.6315.83
Dragonera18.9716.3117.64
Capdepera18.6316.5617.59
Table 6. Salinity concentration, in parts per thousand, in “Puertos del Estado” buoys, in all the areas in the Spanish coast.
Table 6. Salinity concentration, in parts per thousand, in “Puertos del Estado” buoys, in all the areas in the Spanish coast.
AreaBuoyMaximum Salinity ConcentrationAverage Salinity Concentration
(I) Cantabrian coastBilbao-Vizcaya35.5335.32
Cabo de Peñas35.5635.38
(II) Galician coastEstaca de Bares35.7135.55
Villano-Sisargas35.6135.43
Cabo Silleiro35.8735.71
(III) South Atlantic coastCádiz36.6036.45
(IV) Canary Islands coastGran Canaria36.8736.68
Tenerife37.4637.23
(V) Southern Mediterranean coastCabo de Gata37.5137.13
(VI) Northern Mediterranean coastCabo de Palos37.5037.18
Valencia37.9937.70
Tarragona38.2538.02
Table 7. Radiation solar values, in kWh/m2day in all the areas in the Spanish coast.
Table 7. Radiation solar values, in kWh/m2day in all the areas in the Spanish coast.
AreaZoneAverage Annual Radiation
(I) Cantabrian coastPaís Vasco3.53
Cantabria3.66
Asturias3.57
(II) Galician coastGalicia4.16
(III) South Atlantic coastHuelva5.21
Cádiz5.28
Ceuta4.90
(IV) Canary Islands coastCanary Island4.72
(V) Southern Mediterranean coastMálaga5.19
Almería5.28
Murcia5.13
Melilla5.08
(VI) Northern Mediterranean coastValencia4.89
Cataluña4.51
Baleares4.77

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Esteban, M.D.; Espada, J.M.; Ortega, J.M.; López-Gutiérrez, J.-S.; Negro, V. What about Marine Renewable Energies in Spain? J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2019, 7, 249. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse7080249

AMA Style

Esteban MD, Espada JM, Ortega JM, López-Gutiérrez J-S, Negro V. What about Marine Renewable Energies in Spain? Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2019; 7(8):249. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse7080249

Chicago/Turabian Style

Esteban, María Dolores, Juan Manuel Espada, José Marcos Ortega, José-Santos López-Gutiérrez, and Vicente Negro. 2019. "What about Marine Renewable Energies in Spain?" Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 7, no. 8: 249. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse7080249

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop