Next Article in Journal
Underwater Moving Target Localization Based on High-Density Pressure Array Sensing
Next Article in Special Issue
Satellite-Based Machine Learning for Temporal Assessment of Water Quality Parameter Prediction in a Coastal Shallow Lake
Previous Article in Journal
Numerical Study on Wake Wave Characteristics Around a Transom Stern Vessel
Previous Article in Special Issue
InterSeA: An Unmanned Surface Vehicle (USV) for Monitoring the Marine Surface Microlayer (SML) in Coastal Areas
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Atmospheric Deposition of Multi-Class Substances into the Ocean: Synthesis of Fluxes, Seasonal Spatial Patterns and Ecological Risks

School of Chemical Engineering, Ocean and Life Sciences, Dalian University of Technology, Panjin 124000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2026, 14(5), 483; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse14050483
Submission received: 31 January 2026 / Revised: 26 February 2026 / Accepted: 27 February 2026 / Published: 3 March 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Assessment and Monitoring of Coastal Water Quality)

Abstract

Atmospheric deposition is increasingly recognized as a significant pathway transporting diverse substances from land to the ocean. However, significant uncertainties persist regarding the magnitude, spatial variability, and ecological implications of these inputs into the ocean. This study compiles and standardizes observational datasets from published sources to provide a cross-substance synthesis of atmospheric concentrations, deposition fluxes, seasonal patterns, and ecological risks. The analysis covers major substance categories, including nutrients, trace metals, microplastics, POPs and other emerging pollutants. The novelty of this work lies in its cross-pollutant approach and the integration of seasonal dynamics, particularly for winter deposition. Global results show widespread deposition across the world’s oceans, with consistently elevated concentrations in densely populated coastal regions and detectable levels even in remote areas, underscoring the role of long-range transport. Our analysis reveals pronounced winter peaks in regions like the Bohai Sea and the Baltic Sea, highlighting a critical but often overlooked seasonal window. Strong nearshore-to-offshore gradients across most substances indicate dominant influences from coastal anthropogenic emissions. Ecological risk assessment using the Risk Quotient method suggests that risks are generally low but spatially heterogeneous, with hotspots in regions of intensive human activity. Overall, this synthesis highlights the importance of atmospheric pathways in shaping marine substance distributions and emphasizes the need for improved monitoring and modeling to better quantify episodic deposition processes under future environmental change.

1. Introduction

Marine pollution has emerged as a pervasive environmental challenge, with diverse anthropogenic contaminants now detected from heavily impacted coastal margins to the most remote ocean basins [1,2]. Growing evidence has demonstrated that atmospheric inputs can substantially modify seawater chemistry, alter biogeochemical cycles, and influence ecosystem structure and function [3,4]. Although the number of observations has increased, significant uncertainties remain regarding the amount of material the atmosphere delivers to the ocean, the relative contribution of different deposition pathways, and their impacts on marine ecosystems [5]. Previous reviews on atmospheric deposition have primarily focused on individual substance types [6]. While some studies, such as those by [7], have expanded the scope to include multiple substances, few have integrated seasonal analyses or assessed the ecological risks associated with atmospheric deposition. As a result, significant gaps remain in our understanding of the magnitude, variability, and ecological consequences of atmospheric deposition to the ocean, particularly at regional and global scales.
Atmospheric deposition represents a major vector linking terrestrial emissions with ocean biogeochemistry [8]. Substances are transferred to the ocean surface via dry deposition, wet deposition, and aerosol settling, which differ in their physicochemical mechanisms yet jointly regulate the air–sea exchange [9]. Dry deposition drives continuous gravitational settling and gas absorption, whereas wet deposition delivers substances episodically through precipitation scavenging, a process that efficiently removes airborne particles and gases from the atmosphere during rain and snow events. Together, these pathways introduce both micronutrients, such as N, P, Si and Fe that can stimulate primary production [10], and harmful contaminants including microplastics, Hg and POPs [11]. For example, atmospheric N deposition can contribute more than 50% of dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) in marginal seas such as the Bohai Sea [12], while large-scale dust transport supplies bioavailable iron to regions with high levels of nutrients and low quantities of chlorophyll [13]. Conversely, mercury deposition has been shown to induce marked bioaccumulation in estuarine fish species [14], underscoring the contrasting ecological roles of atmospheric inputs, which range from essential nutrient supply to toxic contamination. These atmospheric pathways determine the spatial distribution and seasonal variability of substances in marine environments.
However, current knowledge of atmospheric deposition remains fragmented. Most studies have focused on specific substances or regions, and as a result, the global perspective is fragmented. This has led to uncertainties when it comes to quantifying how much material the atmosphere delivers to the ocean and how this varies by region, season, and substance type. Additionally, many studies have not adequately addressed the seasonal dynamics of deposition. The impact of winter deposition, in particular, has often been overlooked, despite evidence that it can contribute substantially to pollutant loading in ice-covered seas [15]. Furthermore, the ecological consequences of these atmospheric inputs are still poorly understood; there is only limited research focused on integrating the impacts of various pollutants and analyzing their effects on marine ecosystems. Seasonal variations and ecological implications after deposition remain underexplored, making it difficult to accurately assess the risks atmospheric substances pose to marine life.
To address these issues, this study developed a unified framework to quantify the contribution of atmospheric deposition to surface–ocean contamination. The objectives of this study were: (1) to establish a harmonized database that consolidates fragmented observations across major substance categories; (2) to evaluate the effectiveness of consistent normalization procedures in quantifying fluxes and concentrations; (3) to characterize seasonal and spatial variability of the concentrations and deposition fluxes of various substances; and (4) to evaluate ecological risks associated with short-term atmospheric inputs. By integrating diverse substance categories, this work would provide the first cross-pollutant synthesis of atmospheric deposition to the ocean. This synthesis will provide a quantitative basis for constraining regional atmospheric inputs and for evaluating their implications for ecosystem functioning in data limited marine environments.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Literature Compilation

A bibliometric analysis of atmospheric deposition studies was conducted by searching the Web of Science (WOS) core database, with “atmospheric deposition” as the key word. The workflow of the literature screening process is described below. Initially, a total of 4749 relevant documents were searched, and another 77 relevant studies were collected from the reference lists of these documents. Of the 4826 documents, 3035 were excluded, as a review of their abstracts revealed that they were irrelevant to the research topic. As for the remaining 1791 documents, another 1532 were excluded as they did not contain data that could be used for the analysis in this study. From the 259 documents retained for detailed examination, the data from 144 documents could not be unified in units, or the magnitudes were inconsistent, so they were also excluded. For example, one study reported nitrogen deposition in g·kg−1 (as a concentration in collected dust) but failed to report the total mass of dust collected over the sampling period or the surface area of the sampler. Because the essential metadata for converting concentration into a standard flux (g·d−1·km−2) was missing, this document could not be utilized for quantitative comparison. Finally, usable data for analysis were collected from the remaining 115 documents [10,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128]. Comprehensive details of the 115 included studies are provided in the Supplementary Materials S1 to ensure data transparency.
Atmospheric deposition includes two primary pathways: dry deposition, involving the continuous settling of particles and gas absorption, and wet deposition, characterized by the episodic removal of substances through precipitation. Unless otherwise specified, the results presented in the following sections represent total atmospheric deposition, encompassing both dry and wet components without further differentiation.

2.2. Data Standardization and Flux-to-Concentration Conversion Methods

Atmospheric deposition flux and concentration are the basic parameters used to describe atmospheric deposition characteristics. Atmospheric deposition flux refers to the mass of particulate matter falling on a unit area per unit time. The units of measurement used are tons per square kilometer per day (t·km−2·d−1), grams per square meter per day (g·m−2·d−1), kilograms per square meter per year (kg·m−2·year−1), etc. Atmospheric concentration refers to the mass of particles per unit volume. The unit of measurements used are grams per liter (g·L−1), kilograms per cubic meter (kg·m−3), etc. In order to better present the distribution of various substances, the unit of each substance was standardized during data collection and chart creation. Based on the relative molecular mass of the substances and the collected literature data, the atmospheric concentration of nutrients was unified to the unit of nmol·m−3, which was used in most of the studies we referenced. The concentration of mercury was standardized to ng·m−3. The unit for Fe flux was standardized to nmol·m−2·d−1. The abundance of microplastics was standardized to item·m−3. The concentration of persistent organic pollutants was standardized to ng·m−3. While collecting the data, the latitude and longitude of the data collection sites were also recorded to accurately locate them on the global substance distribution map.
Because the collection of flux data was based on atmospheric values, the substance deposition fluxes were converted to the resultant increase in water-column concentration over a short time period—that is, the Predicted Environmental Concentration (PEC)—to substitute for the actual concentration (MEC). Accordingly, the following equation was used for the conversion:
P E C = F × t h × ρ
F is the deposition flux (g·m−2·d−1); t is the deposition duration (d); h is the assumed water depth into which the deposited pollutant is mixed (m); and ρ is the seawater density.

2.3. Seasonal Analysis

The atmospheric deposition of several nutrients and metals in different seasons is estimated using the following equations [41,129]:
D d = ( F d + F w ) × A × D
F d = V d × C
F w = R w × C × P
where Dd is the total deposition (kg), A is the deposition area (m2), and D is the number of deposition days (d). Fd is the dry deposition flux (g·m−2·d−1), Vd is the deposition rate of atmospheric particles simulated using the Williams model (m·s−1), and C is the atmospheric concentration (g·m−3). Fw is the wet deposition flux (g·m−2·d−1), Rw is the scavenging ratio, and P is the precipitation (m·d−1). For regional application, the Bohai Sea and the Baltic Sea were selected as representative marine systems, with deposition fluxes for nutrients and selected metals extracted from studies. The Bohai Sea covers about 77,000 square kilometers and the Baltic Sea covers an area of 377,000 square kilometers. These two areas were utilized as case studies for the calculation of seasonal fluxes, assuming a duration of 90 days per season. The detailed datasets of these areas are provided in Tables S1 and S2 of Supplementary Materials S2.

2.4. Risk Assessment

The Risk Quotient (RQ) method [130] is used to evaluate the potential ecological risk associated with substance exposure. This method assesses ecological hazards by comparing the measured environmental concentration (MEC) of a substance with its Predicted No-Effect Concentration (PNEC). Representative organisms from three trophic levels—algae, invertebrates (e.g., Daphnia), and vertebrates (fish)—are commonly used to derive toxicity thresholds. The highest risk level among the three nutritional levels was selected for the risk assessment. The underlying principle is that the ratio between MEC and PNEC reflects the likelihood of adverse ecological effects.
(1) Single-Factor Risk Quotient (RQ)
R Q = M E C P N E C
where MEC is the actual detected concentration of substances in the environment (g·m−3), typically using the maximum value or a conservative estimate (half the detection limit) when undetected. In this study, the concentration values are those standardized to uniform units. PNEC is the Predicted No-Effect Concentration, which represents the concentration that will not cause harmful effects to organisms under long-term exposure (g·m−3). It is typically derived by dividing toxicity data (such as EC50, LC50, NOEC, etc.) by an assessment factor (AF). The formula is as follows:
P N E C = E C 50   o r   L C 50   o r   N O E C A F
The assessment factor (AF) follows standard practice, with AF = 100 for chronic toxicity data and AF = 1000 for acute data.
(2) Mixed Risk Quotient (MRQ)
The Mixed Risk Quotient (MRQ) is used to evaluate the combined ecological risk posed by multiple co-occurring substances [131]. The calculation equation is as follows:
M R Q = i = 1 n M E C i P N E C i
where MECi and PNECi correspond to the environmental concentration and no-effect concentration of substance i, respectively. Risk levels are interpreted based on RQ values as follows: RQ < 0.01, no risk; RQ < 0.1, low risk; 0.1 ≤ RQ < 1, moderate risk; RQ ≥ 1, high risk.
In this study, PNEC values are obtained from the literature and used to calculate the RQ and MRQ. PNECHg = 0.39 μg·L−1, PNECNO3 = 1 mg·L−1, PNECPO4 = 0.1 mg·L−1, PNECNH4 = 0.5 mg·L−1, PNECMP = 12,000 particls·m−3, PNECPOPs = 1,060,000 ng·m−3 [132,133,134].
The figures in the article were all created using Origin 2024.

3. Results

3.1. Overview of Atmospheric Substance Categories and Monitoring Status

Atmospheric deposition could transport a wide spectrum of substances to marine environments. In this synthesis, these substances were categorized into nutrients (e.g., nitrogen, phosphorus, silicon), organic pollutants (e.g., polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, organophosphate esters, organochlorine pesticides), heavy metals (e.g., mercury, iron), and microplastics (in Figure 1). Across both coastal and open-ocean regions, long-term observational datasets and direct measurement techniques were far more common than short-term campaigns or model-based estimates. Existing studies have covered a wide range of spatial and temporal scales, ranging from nearshore estuaries to open-ocean basins, and from single-event measurements to multi-year monitoring.

3.2. Deposition Flux of Substances

A global distribution map of nitrate, ammonium, and phosphate concentrations was created using atmospheric data from the literature (Figure 2A,B). The nitrate concentration range was 3.85–244 nmol·m−3, the ammonium was 0.38–339 nmol·m−3, and the phosphate was 0.027–2.52 nmol·m−3. These nutrients were reported in various marine regions, including China’s coastal waters (Bohai Sea, Yellow Sea, East China Sea, South China Sea), the U.S. coasts, the Northwest Pacific, the Indian Ocean, the Atlantic Ocean, the Arabian Sea, and the Red Sea. China’s coastal areas generally have higher concentrations than other regions, with elevated ammonium and nitrate levels in North America’s densely populated areas.
Figure 2C,D show the atmospheric deposition fluxes of iron (Fe) and concentration of mercury (Hg), respectively. The iron deposition flux ranged from 2 to 690 nmol·m−2·d−1, with high-flux regions primarily observed in the North Atlantic, the Yellow Sea of China and the Southern Indian Ocean. The atmospheric mercury concentration ranged from 0.07 to 29.3 ng·m−3. Atmospheric Hg concentrations were observed across coastal China and the Indian, Atlantic, and Pacific Oceans, with notably high levels concentrated in the Bohai Sea of China and the Baltic Sea.
The abundance of microplastics ranged from 0.39 to 933 items·100 m−3. Concentrations have been reported in coastal China, the western Pacific, the U.S. coasts, European seas, and near Antarctica, indicating a global distribution (Figure 2E). Atmospheric concentrations of POPs, including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and organochlorine pesticides (OCPs), have been observed in various ship-based and coastal atmospheric sampling stations (Figure 2F). The POPs concentrations ranged from 0.005 to 117 ng·m−3, with high levels observed along the coasts of western Africa, the Europe and the United States. Variations in study designs and target analytes resulted in inter-site variability, with some studies focusing on pesticides, while others included PAHs and PCBs. POPs have been detected even in remote regions like the Arctic.

3.3. Seasonal and Spatial Variation in Atmospheric Deposition Substances

3.3.1. Seasonal Variation

To investigate the seasonal variability of atmospheric deposition, available data were compiled to generate a seasonal distribution map of substances. As shown in Figure 3A, B, atmospheric concentrations and deposition fluxes of ammonium, Cu, Pb, Zn, Cd, and As were elevated in winter compared to other seasons. Quantitative estimates for the Bohai Sea and Baltic Sea further illustrated this winter pattern (Figure 4). In the Bohai Sea, winter deposition of ammonium reached 1.6 × 107 kg approximately, while the deposition of heavy metals included around 3.3 × 105 kg of Cu, 4.6 × 105 kg of Pb, 1.4 × 106 kg of Zn, 7.1 × 103 kg of Cd and 1.5 × 105 kg of As. In the Baltic Sea, winter nitrogen deposition was estimated at approximately 1 × 107 kg, with heavy metals deposition amounts of about 1.5 × 105 kg for Cu, 1.5 × 104 kg for Ni, 2.5 × 105 kg for Mn, and 3 × 104 kg for V.

3.3.2. Spatial Patterns of Substance Concentrations Along the Shore-to-Offshore Gradient

Spatial variations in atmospheric deposition-derived substances showed a clear nearshore–offshore gradient (Figure 5). Concentrations of PO43− and NH4+ decreased significantly with distance from the coast (both p < 0.0001), indicating stronger coastal influences from anthropogenic sources. While PO43− concentrations at offshore stations often approach zero, the fitted function provides a quantitative description of the land-to-ocean transition and the spatial extent of coastal nutrient influence. Trace metals, such as Fe, also declined steeply offshore (p < 0.0001), supporting land-based contributions like industrial emissions and dust. Microplastics and POPs followed a similar pattern, with concentrations decreasing offshore (p < 0.0001 for microplastics, p = 0.0006 for POPs), reflecting terrestrial origins and coastal emissions. The spatial distribution of Hg was also examined; however, as the fitting was not statistically significant (p > 0.05), the plot is provided in Figure S1 (Supplementary Materials S2) for reference. Overall, except for Hg, all substances exhibited significant decreases with distance, highlighting the dominant role of coastal human activities in atmospheric substance distribution.

3.4. Ecological Implications

RQ values were calculated for each substance to characterize the global spatial pattern of ecological risk (Figure 6). Here, the quotient reflects the incremental risk contributed by one day of deposition (t = 1 day), and a mixed-layer depth of 10 m was assumed (h = 10 m). The RQ value of POPs was calculated using the MRQ method. The RQ values for microplastics ranged from 2.74 × 10−6 to 6.60 × 10−3. The RQ values for NO3 ranged from 9.56 × 10−5 to 6.06 × 10−3. The RQ values for NH4 ranged from 1.96 × 10−6 to 1.75 × 10−3. The RQ values for PO4 ranged from 9.37 × 10−6 to 8.74 × 10−4. The RQ values for Hg ranged from 7.51 × 10−6 to 3.17 × 10−3. The RQ values for POPs ranged from 3.98 × 10−8 to 9.30 × 10−4. The calculated RQ values for all studied components remained below 0.01, indicating a negligible ecological risk based on current atmospheric deposition levels. Since these RQ values were relatively small, a uniform scaling factor of 600 was used during visualization to allow all substances to be displayed within a single plot. The global distribution of atmospheric RQ values exhibited strong spatial heterogeneity and revealed several hotspot regions, particularly along the coasts of East and South Asia, Europe, and the Northwest Atlantic. These patterns reflected the combined influence of population density, urbanization, industrial emissions, and atmospheric transport.

4. Discussion

4.1. Atmospheric Deposition Relative to Other Substance Input Pathways

Compared with river discharge, coastal runoff, and wastewater effluents, atmospheric deposition constitutes a diffuse, non-point source of pollution that is far more difficult to quantify or control [135]. However, as a key pathway linking the atmosphere and the ocean, atmospheric deposition delivers substantial quantities of substances to marine ecosystems. Studies have shown that, in nearshore regions, the total substance load delivered by atmospheric deposition can be considerable, sometimes even comparable to direct terrestrial inputs. In China, for example, the annual land–sea transport of nitrogen is estimated at 8 Tg, with atmospheric deposition accounting for over one-third (~3 Tg) of this total [136]. The Bohai Sea receives the highest atmospheric nitrogen input (~70 kg·ha−1), while the Yellow Sea, East China Sea, and South China Sea receive 8–16 kg·ha−1 [137]. In Europe, the deposition fluxes of N in the Western Mediterranean region are 0.92 Tg·year−1, while in the Eastern Mediterranean region they are 1.10 Tg·year−1, and in the Black Sea region they are 0.36 Tg(N)·year−1 [59]. A study estimated the global annual emissions of MP atmosphere to be approximately 16.1 Tg by combining observational data from the western United States with modeling methods [138]. In the Russian Arctic Ocean, the monthly input of PAHs into the atmosphere was estimated at 1040 tons. The monthly input of mercury into the atmosphere was approximately 530 tons [139].
In the open ocean, where riverine and land-based anthropogenic point sources are essentially absent, apart from the pollution caused by ships, atmospheric deposition becomes a major external pathway supplying both nutrients and contaminants [10,140]. For trace and micro-pollutants such as Hg, POPs, and airborne microplastics, atmospheric inputs frequently represent the primary or even prevailing source to marine ecosystems. In this study, the short-term concentration of Hg deposited into the open ocean via atmospheric deposition was estimated at 0.29 ng·L−1, closely matching the baseline concentration of 0.3 ng·L−1 reported for uncontaminated seawater by the U.S. Toxicological Profile for Mercury. POPs have also been detected in the Arctic, despite the absence of direct terrestrial sources. The occurrence of microplastics in Antarctica further supports atmospheric transport as an important pathway for these particles [141]. These diverse atmospheric inputs operate across spatial scales determined by particle size, chemical reactivity, and atmospheric residence time. As a result, even open-ocean regions far from emission sources are no longer isolated from human influence.

4.2. Transport Distances of Atmospheric Deposition Across Substance Categories

Spatially, all substances except Hg exhibited decreasing concentrations with increasing distance from the shore. This nearshore-to-offshore gradient is consistent with earlier studies [142,143] and reflects the combined influence of terrestrial emissions, air mass movement, and coastal meteorological processes such as sea fog, which collectively enhanced deposition near the coastline. Despite this shared spatial pattern, the magnitude of the gradient and the underlying atmospheric processes differed substantially among nutrients, trace metals, microplastics and POPs, primarily due to differences in physicochemical properties and atmospheric residence times.
Reactive nitrogen in the atmosphere is transported primarily as nitrate (NO3) and ammonium (NH4+). Their relatively short atmospheric lifetimes (from hours to several days) restrict their transport to regional scales, producing strong land–sea concentration gradients [144]. Wet deposition dominates in monsoon-affected regions, efficiently removing N species near their source regions. Phosphorus is often associated with coarse particles, and its atmospheric residence time is also short (from days to two weeks), reinforcing its steep nearshore decline [145]. Microplastics’ low density and small particle size facilitate uplift and atmospheric transport across regional and even intercontinental scales [146]. Microplastics are removed from the atmosphere through both dry deposition and precipitation scavenging, explaining their widespread detection across coastal seas, open-ocean environments, and even polar regions [38]. Once deposited into the ocean, they are subject to vertical transport and can accumulate from the surface waters to the benthic sediments [147], contributing to microplastic pollution that is both widespread and persistent in the marine environment.
Mercury differs fundamentally from other metals. Mercury enters the atmosphere from both natural and anthropogenic sources, predominantly as gaseous elemental mercury (GEM), which constitutes over 95% of atmospheric Hg [97]. GEM’s low solubility and long atmospheric lifetime enable its long-range transport. Through oxidation, GEM converts to reactive gaseous mercury (GOM), which subsequently deposits via wet and dry processes. These atmospheric transformation pathways may explain Hg’s relatively uniform spatial distribution compared with other substances.

4.3. Ecological Consequences in the Ocean

Overall, the ecological risks associated with atmospheric deposition were negligible, with most Risk Quotient (RQ) values remaining below 0.01—substantially lower than those reported for aquatic water columns or sediments. Similar low-risk patterns have been documented for Hg, OCPs, and PAHs in surface waters across different regions [132,148,149]. It should be noted that these risk estimates are sensitive to the assumed mixing depth (10 m). While a 10 m depth is representative of the well-mixed surface layer in the ocean, a shallower mixing depth would linearly increase the predicted concentrations. Furthermore, the 10 m model is a simplified first-order screening tool that does not explicitly account for complex oceanic processes such as advection, stratification, and biological uptake. However, by ignoring these removal and dilution pathways, our approach provides a highly conservative estimate of ecological risk. Even with a significantly reduced mixing volume or under these worst-case scenario assumptions, the RQ values remain well below the threshold of concern (0.1), further confirming the robustness of the negligible risk conclusion. Nevertheless, elevated RQs were consistently observed in densely populated coastal regions, including southeastern China, Japan, Southeast Asia, eastern North America, and Europe. These spatial hotspots coincided with areas of intense anthropogenic emissions and enhanced atmospheric inputs, indicating that while risks remain low at a global scale, localized ecological pressure may still occur in human-impacted coastal systems.
Seasonal processes, particularly winter deposition, may generate short-term ecological stress that is not fully captured by annual-average risk metrics. In seasonally ice-covered seas such as the Bohai Sea, atmospheric substances accumulate on the surface of the ice during winter and are rapidly released into the water column during melt periods, producing abrupt concentration increases over short timescales [150]. Reported post-melt concentrations of dissolved inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus, as well as trace metals, reached levels comparable to or exceeding background seawater values [151,152]. These episodic inputs may temporarily elevate nutrient availability or metal exposure, potentially intensifying ecological pressure during sensitive seasonal windows, even when long-term risks remain low.
Beyond short-term pulses, sustained atmospheric deposition may exert meaningful ecological impacts through long-term accumulation and chronic exposure. Continuous inputs of nitrogen and phosphorus can gradually alter nutrient stoichiometry, reinforce eutrophication tendencies, and promote shifts toward bloom-forming or opportunistic phytoplankton taxa in coastal waters [153,154]. For trace metals, atmospheric Hg poses risk mainly through post-depositional transformation and bioaccumulation rather than instantaneous concentrations, leading to long-term ecological and human health concerns [155,156]. Similarly, microplastics and POPs may induce cumulative biological stress through persistent exposure, trophic transfer, and biomagnification, affecting organism health, the food-web structure, and ecosystem functioning [157,158,159,160,161]. These long-term processes highlight that low RQ values based on short-term exposure do not preclude significant ecological consequences over extended timescales.
Beyond traditional pollutants, emerging airborne contaminants, including pharmaceuticals, personal care products, and PFAS, have been detected in atmospheric depositions with increasing frequency. These compounds exhibit persistence, bioaccumulation potential, and diverse toxicological effects, even at low concentrations [162]. Their ecological implications may include altered microbial processes, impaired organismal health, and risks to humans via food-web transfer. Current monitoring remains limited, highlighting substantial knowledge gaps regarding their atmospheric transport and marine impacts.

4.4. Advantages, Limitations and Knowledge Gaps

This study synthesizes atmospheric deposition data across marginal seas and ocean basins, integrating major substance groups, nutrients, trace metals, microplastics, and POPs, into a single framework. By merging multi-source observations with published flux estimates, spatial and seasonal patterns were resolved with greater consistency. Our cross-substance analysis underscores the dominant role of atmospheric deposition in driving trace and micro-pollutant inputs to offshore environments, effectively linking terrestrial emissions to marine biogeochemistry.
However, several uncertainties limit the quantitative precision of these findings. Most notably, deposition flux estimates are heavily constrained by the scarcity of dry-deposition measurements, particularly in the open ocean. While our synthesis is based on a wide range of observational data, it is must be acknowledged that the spatial density of measurements is higher in coastal margins than in open-ocean regions, which may influence the precision of global spatial generalizations. This study primarily focuses on the spatial comparison of contemporary datasets; future research should address the sparse data coverage in remote marine environments to further refine our understanding of global atmospheric input patterns. Furthermore, the use of heterogeneous datasets—varying in sampling strategy and analytical methods—introduces potential methodological inconsistencies. Specifically, although various substances have been normalized into a single comparative framework, it should be noted that microplastics and nutrients exhibit fundamentally different physicochemical behaviors. Our analysis provides a cross-pollutant synthesis of total atmospheric loading to offer a holistic perspective on the cumulative pressure of atmospheric inputs on marine systems, but the specific environmental fate of each substance category must be interpreted with caution. Finally, due to the lack of detailed speciation data in global atmospheric monitoring, our risk assessment is based on total concentrations; while this provides a robust first-order, conservative screening of ecological pressure, future research must prioritize pollutant speciation to further refine the precision of toxicity and bioavailability interpretations. It should be noted that the current analysis does not account for bidirectional air–sea exchange of semi-volatile species (such as Hg) or post-depositional processes, which adds uncertainty to the net flux estimates.
Moving forward, bridging the gap between observation and process understanding is critical. There is an urgent need for high-resolution, long-term deposition measurements to replace the current reliance on model extrapolation in open-ocean regions. Future research must also better characterize pollutant speciation and chemical aging to determine bioavailability. Ultimately, the field requires integrated ocean–atmosphere models that can capture multi-pollutant interactions and the ecological impacts of deposition, from altering microbial communities to facilitating trophic transfer.

5. Conclusions

This study achieves a comprehensive synthesis of atmospheric deposition for major substance groups across global marine environments. A key strength of this work is the quantitative confirmation of land-to-sea gradients for almost all studied substances, which underscores the overwhelming dominance of terrestrial anthropogenic sources, except in the case of Hg. Even remote Arctic ecosystems are now clearly coupled to mid-latitude emissions via long-range transport. Seasonally, our findings point to a critical gap in understanding winter deposition, where sea ice acts as a temporary reservoir, potentially leading to shock loads of pollutants during melt seasons. Although current ecological risks are assessed as negligible (RQ < 0.01), the cumulative impact in coastal hotspots remains a concern. Looking forward, it is imperative to address the scarcity of data on ice-mediated transport through targeted field campaigns, especially in rapidly changing polar regions. Furthermore, future efforts should leverage integrated biogeochemical modeling to bridge the gap between static deposition fluxes and their dynamic biological impacts on marine ecosystems.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jmse14050483/s1, S1 provides a complete list of the 115 peer-reviewed publications that served as the data sources for this study. S2 provides Tables S1: Deposition flux tables for each season in the Bohai Sea and Table S2: Deposition flux tables for each season in the Baltic Sea, and Figure S1: Hg with distance from the shore. S3 provides the research data.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.Z.; Methodology, J.Z.; data curation, Q.L.; investigation, J.W.; writing—original draft preparation, Q.L.; writing—review and editing, X.Y., Y.Z. and J.Z.; supervision, J.Z.; funding acquisition, Y.Z. and J.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. U24A20582).

Data Availability Statement

The relevant data can be obtained from Supplementary Materials S3.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
POPsPersistent Organic Pollutants.
RQRisk Quotient.
MRQMixed Risk Quotient.
DINDissolved Inorganic Nitrogen.
WOSWeb of Science.
PECPredicted Environmental Concentration.
MECMeasured Environmental Concentration.
PNECPredicted No-Effect Concentration.
AFAssessment factor.
PCBsPolychlorinated Biphenyls.
OCPsOrganochlorine Pesticides.
PAHsPolycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons.
EC50Half Maximal Effective Concentration.
LC50Median Lethal Concentration.
NOECNo Observed Effect Concentration.

References

  1. Morley, S.A.; Abele, D.; Barnes, D.K.A.; Cárdenas, C.A.; Cotté, C.; Gutt, J.; Henley, S.F.; Höfer, J.; Hughes, K.A.; Martin, S.M.; et al. Global Drivers on Southern Ocean Ecosystems: Changing Physical Environments and Anthropogenic Pressures in an Earth System. Front. Mar. Sci. 2020, 7, 547188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Dachs, J.; Méjanelle, L. Organic Pollutants in Coastal Waters, Sediments, and Biota: A Relevant Driver for Ecosystems During the Anthropocene? Estuaries Coasts 2010, 33, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Krishnamurthy, A.; Moore, J.K.; Mahowald, N.; Luo, C.; Zender, C.S. Impacts of atmospheric nutrient inputs on marine biogeochemistry. J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeosci. 2010, 115, G01006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zitoun, R.; Marcinek, S.; Hatje, V.; Sander, S.G.; Völker, C.; Sarin, M.; Omanović, D. Climate change driven effects on transport, fate and biogeochemistry of trace element contaminants in coastal marine ecosystems. Commun. Earth Environ. 2024, 5, 560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Allen, D.; Allen, S.; Abbasi, S.; Baker, A.; Bergmann, M.; Brahney, J.; Butler, T.; Duce, R.A.; Eckhardt, S.; Evangeliou, N.; et al. Microplastics and nanoplastics in the marine-atmosphere environment. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2022, 3, 393–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhang, Q.; Li, Y.; Wang, M.; Wang, K.; Meng, F.; Liu, L.; Zhao, Y.; Ma, L.; Zhu, Q.; Xu, W.; et al. Atmospheric nitrogen deposition: A review of quantification methods and its spatial pattern derived from the global monitoring networks. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 216, 112180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wright, L.P.; Zhang, L.M.; Cheng, I.; Aherne, J.; Wentworth, G.R. Impacts and Effects Indicators of Atmospheric Deposition of Major Pollutants to Various Ecosystems—A Review. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 2018, 18, 1953–1992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tan, S.; Cheung, S.; Ho, T.-Y.; Liu, H. Metatranscriptomics of the bacterial community in response to atmospheric deposition in the Western North Pacific Ocean. Mar. Genom. 2019, 45, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ventura, A.; Simoes, E.F.C.; Almeida, A.S.; Martins, R.; Duarte, A.C.; Loureiro, S.; Duarte, R. Deposition of Aerosols onto Upper Ocean and Their Impacts on Marine Biota. Atmosphere 2021, 12, 684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hamilton, D.S.; Perron, M.M.G.; Bond, T.C.; Bowie, A.R.; Buchholz, R.R.; Guieu, C.; Ito, A.; Maenhaut, W.; Myriokefalitakis, S.; Olgun, N.; et al. Earth, Wind, Fire, and Pollution: Aerosol Nutrient Sources and Impacts on Ocean Biogeochemistry. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 2022, 14, 303–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hossain, M.; Engelhardt, I. Global plastic footprint: Unveiling property trends, environmental fate, and emerging threats of microplastic and nanoplastics pollution across ecosystems. Energy Ecol. Environ. 2025, 10, 637–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yao, Y.; Yu, G.; Han, L.; Chen, Z.; Wang, T.; Yan, Z.; Wang, J.; Sun, M. Atmospheric Nitrogen Deposition Controls Interannual Variability of Net Primary Production in the Bohai Sea. J. Geophys. Res.-Ocean. 2024, 129, e2024JC021562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zan, J.; Maher, B.A.; Fang, X.; Stevens, T.; Ning, W.; Wu, F.; Yang, Y.; Kang, J.; Hu, Z. Global dust impacts on biogeochemical cycles and climate. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2025, 6, 789–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Eagles-Smith, C.A.; Ackerman, J.T. Mercury bioaccumulation in estuarine wetland fishes: Evaluating habitats and risk to coastal wildlife. Environ. Pollut. 2014, 193, 147–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zhang, X.M.; Meyer, T.; Muir, D.C.G.; Teixeira, C.; Wang, X.W.; Wania, F. Atmospheric deposition of current use pesticides in the Arctic: Snow core records from the Devon Island Ice Cap, Nunavut, Canada. Environ. Sci.-Process. Impacts 2013, 15, 2304–2311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Abbasi, S.; Jaafarzadeh, N.; Zahedi, A.; Ravanbakhsh, M.; Abbaszadeh, S.; Turner, A. Microplastics in the atmosphere of Ahvaz City, Iran. J. Environ. Sci. 2023, 126, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Abbasi, S.; Keshavarzi, B.; Moore, F.; Turner, A.; Kelly, F.J.; Dominguez, A.O.; Jaafarzadeh, N. Distribution and potential health impacts of microplastics and microrubbers in air and street dusts from Asaluyeh County, Iran. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 244, 153–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Akhbarizadeh, R.; Dobaradaran, S.; Torkmahalleh, M.A.; Saeedi, R.; Aibaghi, R.; Ghasemi, F.F. Suspended fine particulate matter (PM2.5), microplastics (MPs), and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in air: Their possible relationships and health implications. Environ. Res. 2021, 192, 110339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Alshemmari, H. Past, present and future trends of selected pesticidal and industrial POPs in Kuwait. Environ. Geochem. Health 2022, 44, 3191–3214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Baker, A.R.; Kelly, S.D.; Biswas, K.F.; Witt, M.; Jickells, T.D. Atmospheric deposition of nutrients to the Atlantic Ocean. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2003, 30, 2296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Baker, A.R.; Lesworth, T.; Adams, C.; Jickells, T.D.; Ganzeveld, L. Estimation of atmospheric nutrient inputs to the Atlantic Ocean from 50° N to 50° S based on large-scale field sampling: Fixed nitrogen and dry deposition of phosphorus. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 2010, 24, Gb3006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Baker, A.R.; Weston, K.; Kelly, S.D.; Voss, M.; Streu, P.; Cape, J.N. Dry and wet deposition of nutrients from the tropical Atlantic atmosphere: Links to primary productivity and nitrogen fixation. Deep-Sea Res. Part I-Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 2007, 54, 1704–1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bardouki, H.; Liakakou, H.; Economou, C.; Sciare, J.; Smolı, J.; Ždı, V.; Eleftheriadis, K.; Lazaridis, M.; Dye, C.; Mihalopoulos, N. Chemical composition of size-resolved atmospheric aerosols in the eastern Mediterranean during summer and winter. Atmos. Environ. 2003, 37, 195–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Belelie, M.D.; Ayob, N.; Burger, R.P.; Venter, A.D.; Piketh, S.J. Atmospheric mercury dispersion over the South African Highveld. South Afr. J. Sci. 2025, 121, 17029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Belelie, M.D.; Piketh, S.J.; Burger, R.P.; Venter, A.D.; Naidoo, M. Characterisation of ambient Total Gaseous Mercury concentrations over the South African Highveld. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 2019, 10, 12–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Binici, B.; Yenisoy-Karakas, S.; Bilsel, M.; Durmaz-Hilmioglu, N. Sources of polycyclic hydrocarbons and pesticides in soluble fraction of deposition samples in Kocaeli, Turkey. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2014, 21, 2907–2917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Brorstrom-Lunden, E. Atmospheric deposition of persistent organic compounds to the sea surface. J. Sea Res. 1996, 35, 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Burns, D.A.; Bhatt, G.; Linker, L.C.; Bash, J.O.; Capel, P.D.; Shenk, G.W. Atmospheric nitrogen deposition in the Chesapeake Bay watershed: A history of change. Atmos. Environ. 2021, 251, 118277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Can-Guven, E. Microplastics as emerging atmospheric pollutants: A review and bibliometric analysis. Air Qual. Atmos. Health 2021, 14, 203–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Carbo, P.; Krom, M.D.; Homoky, W.B.; Benning, L.G.; Herut, B. Impact of atmospheric deposition on N and P geochemistry in the southeastern Levantine basin. Deep-Sea Res. Part II-Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 2005, 52, 3041–3053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Castro-Jimenez, J.; Berrojalbiz, N.; Wollgast, J.; Dachs, J. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the Mediterranean Sea: Atmospheric occurrence, deposition and decoupling with settling fluxes in the water column. Environ. Pollut. 2012, 166, 40–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Chen, H.-Y.; Hung, C.-C.; Fang, T.-H.; Gong, G.-C. Dry deposition and particle-size distribution of phosphorus in the marine atmosphere over the northeastern coast of Taiwan. Cont. Shelf Res. 2008, 28, 756–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chen, H.Y.; Chen, L.D. Importance of anthropogenic inputs and continental-derived dust for the distribution and flux of water-soluble nitrogen and phosphorus species in aerosol within the atmosphere over the East China Sea. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos. 2008, 113, D11303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chen, Y.; Mills, S.; Street, J.; Golan, D.; Post, A.; Jacobson, M.; Paytan, A. Estimates of atmospheric dry deposition and associated input of nutrients to Gulf of Aqaba seawater. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos. 2007, 112, D04309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chen, Y.; Siefert, R.L. Seasonal and spatial distributions and dry deposition fluxes of atmospheric total and labile iron over the tropical and subtropical North Atlantic Ocean. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos. 2004, 109, D09305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cindoruk, S.S.; Tasdemir, Y. The investigation of atmospheric deposition distribution of organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) in Turkey. Atmos. Environ. 2014, 87, 207–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Del Vento, S.; Dachs, J. Atmospheric occurrence and deposition of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the northeast tropical and subtropical Atlantic Ocean. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 5608–5613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ding, J.; Sun, C.; He, C.; Zheng, L.; Dai, D.; Li, F. Atmospheric microplastics in the Northwestern Pacific Ocean: Distribution, source, and deposition. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 829, 154337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ding, Y.; Zou, X.; Wang, C.; Feng, Z.; Wang, Y.; Fan, Q.; Chen, H. The abundance and characteristics of atmospheric microplastic deposition in the northwestern South China Sea in the fall. Atmos. Environ. 2021, 253, 118389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Dris, R.; Gasperi, J.; Mirande, C.; Mandin, C.; Guerrouache, M.; Langlois, V.; Tassin, B. A first overview of textile fibers, including microplastics, in indoor and outdoor environments. Environ. Pollut. 2017, 221, 453–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Duce, R.; Liss, P.; Merrill, J.; Atlas, E.; Buat-Menard, P.; Hicks, B.; Miller, J.; Prospero, J.; Arimoto, R.; Church, T.; et al. The atmospheric input of trace species to the world ocean. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 1991, 5, 193–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Engle, M.A.; Tate, M.T.; Krabbenhoft, D.P.; Kolker, A.; Olson, M.L.; Edgerton, E.S.; DeWild, J.F.; McPherson, A.K. Characterization and cycling of atmospheric mercury along the central US Gulf Coast. Appl. Geochem. 2008, 23, 419–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Fang, G.-C.; Wu, Y.-S.; Chang, T.-H. Comparison of atmospheric mercury (Hg) among Korea, Japan, China and Taiwan during 2000–2008. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 162, 607–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Feng, X.B.; Shang, L.H.; Wang, S.F.; Tang, S.L.; Zheng, W. Temporal variation of total gaseous mercury in the air of Guiyang, China. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos. 2004, 109, D03303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Feng, X.B.; Tang, S.L.; Shang, L.H.; Yan, H.Y.; Sommar, J.; Lindqvist, O. Total gaseous mercury in the atmosphere of Guiyang, PR China. Sci. Total Environ. 2003, 304, 61–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ferm, M. Atmospheric ammonia and ammonium transport in Europe and critical loads: A review. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 1998, 51, 5–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Fisher, J.A.; Nelson, P.F. Atmospheric mercury in Australia: Recent findings and future research needs. Elem.-Sci. Anthr. 2020, 8, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Fu, X.; Feng, X.; Zhu, W.; Wang, S.; Lu, J. Total gaseous mercury concentrations in ambient air in the eastern slope of Mt. Gongga, South-Eastern fringe of the Tibetan plateau, China. Atmos. Environ. 2008, 42, 970–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Gao, Y.A. Atmospheric nitrogen deposition to Barnegat Bay. Atmos. Environ. 2002, 36, 5783–5794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Gaston, E.; Woo, M.; Steele, C.; Sukumaran, S.; Anderson, S. Microplastics Differ Between Indoor and Outdoor Air Masses: Insights from Multiple Microscopy Methodologies. Appl. Spectrosc. 2020, 74, 1079–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Gigliotti, C.L.; Dachs, J.; Nelson, E.D.; Brunciak, P.A.; Eisenreich, S.J. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the New Jersey coastal atmosphere. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000, 34, 3547–3554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Golomb, D.; Ryan, D.; Eby, N.; Underhill, J.; Zemba, S. Atmospheric deposition of toxics onto Massachusetts Bay. 1. Metals. Atmos. Environ. 1997, 31, 1349–1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Gratz, L.E.; Eckley, C.S.; Schwantes, S.J.; Mattson, E. Ambient Mercury Observations near a Coal-Fired Power Plant in a Western US Urban Area. Atmosphere 2019, 10, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. He, J.; Balasubramanian, R.; Burger, D.F.; Hicks, K.; Kuylenstierna, J.C.I.; Palani, S. Dry and wet atmospheric deposition of nitrogen and phosphorus in Singapore. Atmos. Environ. 2011, 45, 2760–2768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Heimburger, A.; Losno, R.; Triquet, S.; Nguyen, E.B. Atmospheric deposition fluxes of 26 elements over the Southern Indian Ocean: Time series on Kerguelen and Crozet Islands. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 2013, 27, 440–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Herut, B.; Collier, R.; Krom, M.D. The role of dust in supplying nitrogen and phosphorus to the Southeast Mediterranean. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2002, 47, 870–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Hsu, S.-C.; Wong, G.T.F.; Gong, G.-C.; Shiah, F.-K.; Huang, Y.-T.; Kao, S.-J.; Tsai, F.; Lung, S.-C.C.; Lin, F.-J.; Lin, I.I.; et al. Sources, solubility, and dry deposition of aerosol trace elements over the East China Sea. Mar. Chem. 2010, 120, 116–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Huang, D.-Y.; Peng, P.A.; Xu, Y.-G.; Sun, C.-X.; Deng, H.-M.; Deng, Y.-Y. Distribution, regional sources and deposition fluxes of organochlorine pesticides in precipitation in Guangzhou, South China. Atmos. Res. 2010, 97, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Im, U.; Christodoulaki, S.; Violaki, K.; Zarmpas, P.; Kocak, M.; Daskalakis, N.; Mihalopoulos, N.; Kanakidou, M. Atmospheric deposition of nitrogen and sulfur over southern Europe with focus on the Mediterranean and the Black Sea. Atmos. Environ. 2013, 81, 660–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Jickells, T.D.; Baker, A.R.; Chance, R. Atmospheric transport of trace elements and nutrients to the oceans. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A-Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2016, 374, 20150286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Karthik, R.; Paneerselvam, A.; Ganguly, D.; Hariharan, G.; Srinivasalu, S.; Purvaja, R.; Ramesh, R. Temporal variability of atmospheric Total Gaseous Mercury and its correlation with meteorological parameters at a high-altitude station of the South India. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 2017, 8, 164–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kawakami, N.; Osada, K.; Nishita, C.; Yabuki, M.; Kobayashi, H.; Hara, K.; Shiobara, M. Factors controlling sea salt modification and dry deposition of nonsea-salt components to the ocean. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos. 2008, 113, D14216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kentisbeer, J.; Leaver, D.; Cape, J.N. An analysis of total gaseous mercury (TGM) concentrations across the UK from a rural sampling network. J. Environ. Monit. 2011, 13, 1653–1661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Kim, K.-H.; Kim, M.-Y.; Kim, J.; Lee, G. The concentrations and fluxes of total gaseous mercury in a western coastal area of Korea during late March 2001. Atmos. Environ. 2002, 36, 3413–3427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Kim, K.H.; Kim, M.Y. The effects of anthropogenic sources on temporal distribution characteristics of total gaseous mercury in Korea. Atmos. Environ. 2000, 34, 3337–3347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Koçak, M.; Kubilay, N.; Mihalopoulos, N. Ionic composition of lower tropospheric aerosols at a Northeastern Mediterranean site: Implications regarding sources and long-range transport. Atmos. Environ. 2004, 38, 2067–2077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Kouvarakis, G.; Mihalopoulos, N.; Tselepides, A.; Stavrakaki, S. On the importance of atmospheric inputs of inorganic nitrogen species on the productivity of the eastern Mediterranean Sea. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 2001, 15, 805–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Kuang, Z.H.; McConnell, L.L.; Torrents, A.; Meritt, D.; Tobash, S. Atmospheric deposition of pesticides to an agricultural watershed of the Chesapeake Bay. J. Environ. Qual. 2003, 32, 1611–1622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kuo, T.-H.; Chang, C.-F.; Urba, A.; Kvietkus, K. Atmospheric gaseous mercury in northern Taiwan. Sci. Total Environ. 2006, 368, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Lao, Q.; Jiao, L.; Chen, L.; Sun, X.; Chen, F.; Liu, G.; Zhang, C. The effect of typhoons on POPs in atmospheric particulates over the coastal islands of Fujian, southeast China. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 2020, 26, 890–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Lefer, B.L.; Talbot, R.W. Summertime measurements of aerosol nitrate and ammonium at a northeastern US site. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos. 2001, 106, 20365–20378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Li, Y.; Shao, L.; Wang, W.; Zhang, M.; Feng, X.; Li, W.; Zhang, D. Airborne fiber particles: Types, size and concentration observed in Beijing. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 705, 135967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Liu, K.; Wang, X.; Fang, T.; Xu, P.; Zhu, L.; Li, D. Source and potential risk assessment of suspended atmospheric microplastics in Shanghai. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 675, 462–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Liu, K.; Wang, X.; Song, Z.; Wei, N.; Ye, H.; Cong, X.; Zhao, L.; Li, Y.; Qu, L.; Zhu, L.; et al. Global inventory of atmospheric fibrous microplastics input into the ocean: An implication from the indoor origin. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 400, 123223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Liu, K.; Wu, T.; Wang, X.; Song, Z.; Zong, C.; Wei, N.; Li, D. Consistent Transport of Terrestrial Microplastics to the Ocean through Atmosphere. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 10612–10619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Liu, M.; Zheng, H.; Li, H.; Chen, F.; Lou, L.; Wang, W.; Zhang, H.; Chen, C.; Ye, J.; Yan, M.; et al. Field evidence and modeling validation of biogeochemical controls on the deposition of persistent organic pollutants in the deep ocean. J. Hazard. Mater. 2024, 480, 136395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Liu, S.L.; Nadim, F.; Perkins, C.; Carley, R.J.; Hoag, G.E.; Lin, Y.H.; Chen, L.T. Atmospheric mercury monitoring survey in Beijing, China. Chemosphere 2002, 48, 97–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Lohmann, R.; Breivik, K.; Dachs, J.; Muir, D. Global fate of POPs: Current and future research directions. Environ. Pollut. 2007, 150, 150–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Lohmann, R.; Markham, E.; Klanova, J.; Kukucka, P.; Pribylova, P.; Gong, X.; Pockalny, R.; Yanishevsky, T.; Wagner, C.C.; Sunderland, E.M. Trends of Diverse POPs in Air and Water Across the Western Atlantic Ocean: Strong Gradients in the Ocean but Not in the Air. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 55, 9498–9507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Long, X.; Fu, T.-M.; Yang, X.; Tang, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Zhu, L.; Shen, H.; Ye, J.; Wang, C.; Wang, T.; et al. Efficient Atmospheric Transport of Microplastics over Asia and Adjacent Oceans. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 56, 6243–6252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Luarte, T.; Gomez-Aburto, V.A.; Poblete-Castro, I.; Castro-Nallar, E.; Huneeus, N.; Molina-Montenegro, M.; Egas, C.; Azcune, G.; Perez-Parada, A.; Lohmann, R.; et al. Levels of persistent organic pollutants (POPs) in the Antarctic atmosphere over time (1980 to 2021) and estimation of their atmospheric half-lives. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2023, 23, 8103–8118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Luarte, T.; Hirmas-Olivares, A.; Hofer, J.; Giesecke, R.; Mestre, M.; Guajardo-Leiva, S.; Castro-Nallar, E.; Perez-Paradal, A.; Chiang, G.; Lohmann, R.; et al. Occurrence and diffusive air-seawater exchanges of organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in Fildes Bay, King George Island, Antarctica. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 908, 168323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Ma, Y.; Luo, Y.; Zhu, J.; Zhang, J.; Gao, G.; Mi, W.; Xie, Z.; Lohmann, R. Seasonal variation and deposition of atmospheric organophosphate esters in the coastal region of Shanghai, China. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 300, 118930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Ma, Y.; Xie, Z.; Yang, H.; Möller, A.; Halsall, C.; Cai, M.; Sturm, R.; Ebinghaus, R. Deposition of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the North Pacific and the Arctic. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2013, 11, 5822–5829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Mace, K.A.; Kubilay, N.; Duce, R.A. Organic nitrogen in rain and aerosol in the eastern Mediterranean atmosphere: An association with atmospheric dust. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos. 2003, 108, 4320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Mackey, K.R.M.; van Dijken, G.L.; Mazloom, S.; Erhardt, A.M.; Ryan, J.; Arrigo, K.R.; Paytan, A. Influence of atmospheric nutrients on primary productivity in a coastal upwelling region. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 2010, 24, Gb4027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Mahowald, N.; Jickells, T.D.; Baker, A.R.; Artaxo, P.; Benitez-Nelson, C.R.; Bergametti, G.; Bond, T.C.; Chen, Y.; Cohen, D.D.; Herut, B.; et al. Global distribution of atmospheric phosphorus sources, concentrations and deposition rates, and anthropogenic impacts. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 2008, 22, Gb4026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Markaki, Z.; Oikonomou, K.; Kocak, M.; Kouvarakis, G.; Chaniotaki, A.; Kubilay, N.; Mihalopoulos, N. Atmospheric deposition of inorganic phosphorus in the Levantine Basin, eastern Mediterranean: Spatial and temporal variability and its role in seawater productivity. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2003, 48, 1557–1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Marusczak, N.; Castelle, S.; de Voguee, B.; Knoery, J.; Cossa, D. Seasonal Variations of Total Gaseous Mercury at a French Coastal Mediterranean Site. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 2016, 16, 46–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Matsumoto, K.; Minami, H.; Uyama, Y.; Uematsu, M. Size partitioning of particulate inorganic nitrogen species between the fine and coarse mode ranges and its implication to their deposition on the surface ocean. Atmos. Environ. 2009, 43, 4259–4265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Mazur, M.; Mintz, R.; Lapalme, M.; Wiens, B. Ambient air total gaseous mercury concentrations in the vicinity of coal-fired power plants in Alberta, Canada. Sci. Total Environ. 2009, 408, 373–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Mihalopoulos, N.; Stephanou, E.; Kanakidou, M.; Pilitsidis, S.; Bousquet, P. Tropospheric aerosol ionic composition in the Eastern Mediterranean region. Tellus Ser. B-Chem. Phys. Meteorol. 1997, 49, 314–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Morales, L.; Dachs, J.; Gonzalez-Gaya, B.; Hernan, G.; Abalos, M.; Abad, E. Background Concentrations of Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-Dioxins, Dibenzofurans, and Biphenyls in the Global Oceanic Atmosphere. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 10198–10207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Nakamura, T.; Matsumoto, K.; Uematsu, M. Chemical characteristics of aerosols transported from Asia to the East China Sea: An evaluation of anthropogenic combined nitrogen deposition in autumn. Atmos. Environ. 2005, 39, 1749–1758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Nguyen, H.T.; Kim, K.-H.; Kim, M.-Y.; Hong, S.; Youn, Y.-H.; Shon, Z.-H.; Lee, J.S. Monitoring of atmospheric mercury at a global atmospheric watch (GAW) site on An-Myun Island, Korea. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2007, 185, 149–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. O’Driscoll, K. Air-Sea Exchange of Legacy POPs in the North Sea Based on Results of Fate and Transport, and Shelf-Sea Hydrodynamic Ocean Models. Atmosphere 2014, 5, 156–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Obrist, D.; Hallar, A.G.; McCubbin, I.; Stephens, B.B.; Rahn, T. Atmospheric mercury concentrations at Storm Peak Laboratory in the Rocky Mountains: Evidence for long-range transport from Asia, boundary layer contributions, and plant mercury uptake. Atmos. Environ. 2008, 42, 7579–7589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Palm, A.; Cousins, I.; Gustafsson, Ö.; Axelman, J.; Grunder, K.; Broman, D.; Brorström-Lundén, E. Evaluation of sequentially-coupled POP fluxes estimated from simultaneous measurements in multiple compartments of an air-water-sediment system. Environ. Pollut. 2004, 128, 85–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Park, J.S.; Wade, T.L.; Sweet, S.T. Atmospheric deposition of PAHs, PCBs, and organochlorine pesticides to Corpus Christi Bay, Texas. Atmos. Environ. 2002, 36, 1707–1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Prata, J.C.; Castro, J.L.; da Costa, J.P.; Duarte, A.C.; Rocha-Santos, T.; Cerqueira, M. The importance of contamination control in airborne fibers and microplastic sampling: Experiences from indoor and outdoor air sampling in Aveiro, Portugal. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2020, 159, 111522, Correction in Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2021, 166, 111888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111888.. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Qi, J.; Yu, Y.; Yao, X.; Gang, Y.; Gao, H. Dry deposition fluxes of inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus in atmospheric aerosols over the Marginal Seas and Northwest Pacific. Atmos. Res. 2020, 245, 105076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Quinn, P.K.; Bates, T.S.; Johnson, J.E.; Covert, D.S.; Charlson, R.J. Interactions between the sulfur and reduced nitrogen cycles over the central Pacific-Ocean. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos. 1990, 95, 16405–16416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Robarge, W.P.; Walker, J.T.; McCulloch, R.B.; Murray, G. Atmospheric concentrations of ammonia and ammonium at an agricultural site in the southeast United States. Atmos. Environ. 2002, 36, 1661–1674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Russell, K.M.; Keene, W.C.; Maben, J.R.; Galloway, J.N.; Moody, J.L. Phase partitioning and dry deposition of atmospheric nitrogen at the mid-Atlantic US coast. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos. 2003, 108, 4656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Sakata, M.; Marumoto, K. Formation of atmospheric particulate mercury in the Tokyo metropolitan area. Atmos. Environ. 2002, 36, 239–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Sauret, N.; Wortham, H.; Strekowski, R.; Herckes, P.; Nieto, L.I. Comparison of annual dry and wet deposition fluxes of selected pesticides in Strasbourg, France. Environ. Pollut. 2009, 157, 303–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Scudlark, J.R.; Conko, K.M.; Church, T.M. Atmospheric wet deposition of trace-elements to Chesapeake Bay—CBAD study year-1 results. Atmos. Environ. 1994, 28, 1487–1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Shi, J.-H.; Zhang, J.; Gao, H.-W.; Tan, S.-C.; Yao, X.-H.; Ren, J.-L. Concentration, solubility and deposition flux of atmospheric particulate nutrients over the Yellow Sea. Deep-Sea Res. Part II-Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 2013, 97, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Shruti, V.C.; Kutralam-Muniasamy, G.; Perez-Guevara, F.; Roy, P.D.; Martinez, I.E. Occurrence and characteristics of atmospheric microplastics in Mexico City. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 847, 157601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Sorooshian, A.; Corral, A.F.; Braun, R.A.; Cairns, B.; Crosbie, E.; Ferrare, R.; Hair, J.; Kleb, M.M.; Mardi, A.H.; Maring, H.; et al. Atmospheric Research Over the Western North Atlantic Ocean Region and North American East Coast: A Review of Past Work and Challenges Ahead. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos. 2020, 125, e2019JD031626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Srinivas, B.; Sarin, M.M. Atmospheric deposition of N, P and Fe to the Northern Indian Ocean: Implications to C- and N-fixation. Sci. Total Environ. 2013, 456, 104–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Srinivas, B.; Sarin, M.M. Atmospheric deposition of phosphorus to the Northern Indian Ocean. Curr. Sci. 2015, 108, 1300–1305. [Google Scholar]
  113. Tan, H.; He, J.L.; Liang, L.; Lazoff, S.; Sommer, J.; Xiao, Z.F.; Lindqvist, O. Atmospheric mercury deposition in Guizhou, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2000, 259, 223–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Uematsu, M.; Hattori, H.; Nakamura, T.; Narita, Y.; Jung, J.Y.; Matsumoto, K.; Nakaguchi, Y.; Kumar, M.D. Atmospheric transport and deposition of anthropogenic substances from the Asia to the East China Sea. Mar. Chem. 2010, 120, 108–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Van Drooge, B.L.; Grimalt, J.O.; Torres-García, C.J.; Cuevas, E. Deposition of semi-volatile organochlorine compounds in the free troposphere of the eastern north Atlantic ocean. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2001, 42, 628–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Varenik, A.V.; Konovalov, S.K. Variations in Concentrations and Ratio of Soluble Forms of Nutrients in Atmospheric Depositions and Effects for Marine Coastal Areas of Crimea, Black Sea. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 11509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Villafane, A.B.; Ronda, A.C.; Pirani, L.S.R.; Picone, A.L.; Lucchi, L.D.; Romano, R.M.; Pereyra, M.T.; Arias, A.H. Microplastics and anthropogenic debris in rainwater from Bahia Blanca, Argentina. Heliyon 2023, 9, e17028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Wang, C.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, X. Characteristics of the air-sea exchange of gaseous mercury and deposition flux of atmospheric mercury at an island near the boundary of the Bohai Sea and Yellow Sea. Atmos. Environ. 2020, 232, 117547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Wang, C.L.; Zou, X.Q.; Zhao, Y.F.; Li, Y.L.; Song, Q.C.; Wang, T.; Yu, W.W. Distribution pattern and mass budget of sedimentary polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in shelf areas of the Eastern China Marginal Seas. J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans 2017, 122, 4990–5004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Wang, S.F.; Feng, X.B.; Qiu, G.L.; Wei, Z.Q.; Xiao, T.F. Mercury emission to atmosphere from Lanmuchang Hg-Tl mining area, Southwestern Guizhou, China. Atmos. Environ. 2005, 39, 7459–7473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Wang, X.; Li, C.; Liu, K.; Zhu, L.; Song, Z.; Li, D. Atmospheric microplastic over the South China Sea and East Indian Ocean: Abundance, distribution and source. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 389, 121846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Wang, X.; Liu, K.; Zhu, L.; Li, C.; Song, Z.; Li, D. Efficient transport of atmospheric microplastics onto the continent via the East Asian summer monsoon. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 414, 125477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Wong, H.L.; Giesy, J.P.; Lam, P.K.S. Atmospheric deposition and fluxes of organochlorine pesticides and coplanar polychlorinated biphenyls in aquatic environments of Hong Kong, China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 6513–6521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Wu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Song, L.; Yang, M.; Liu, X.; Yu, J.; Liang, G.; Zhang, Y. Occurrence and dry deposition of organophosphate esters in atmospheric particles above the Bohai Sea and northern Yellow Sea, China. Atmos. Environ. 2022, 269, 118831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Yuan, Z.; Li, H.-X.; Lin, L.; Pan, Y.-F.; Liu, S.; Hou, R.; Xu, X.-R. Occurrence and human exposure risks of atmospheric microplastics: A review. Gondwana Res. 2022, 108, 200–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Zhang, J.; Zhang, G.S.; Bi, Y.F.; Liu, S.M. Nitrogen species in rainwater and aerosols of the Yellow and East China seas: Effects of the East Asian monsoon and anthropogenic emissions and relevance for the NW Pacific Ocean. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 2011, 25, Gb3020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Zhang, Y.; Kang, S.; Allen, S.; Allen, D.; Gao, T.; Sillanpaa, M. Atmospheric microplastics: A review on current status and perspectives. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2020, 203, 103118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Zhu, L.; Chen, Y.; Guo, L.; Wang, F. Estimate of dry deposition fluxes of nutrients over the East China Sea: The implication of aerosol ammonium to non-sea-salt sulfate ratio to nutrient deposition of coastal oceans. Atmos. Environ. 2013, 69, 131–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Lestari, P.; Oskouie, A.K.; Noll, K.E. Size distribution and dry deposition of particulate mass, sulfate and nitrate in an urban area. Atmos. Environ. 2003, 37, 2507–2516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Paíga, P.; Correia-Sá, L.; Correia, M.; Figueiredo, S.; Vieira, J.; Jorge, S.; Silva, J.G.; Delerue-Matos, C. Temporal Analysis of Pharmaceuticals as Emerging Contaminants in Surface Water and Wastewater Samples: A Case Study. J. Xenobiotics 2024, 14, 873–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Zheng, Z.-Y.; Ni, H.-G. Predicted no-effect concentration for eight PAHs and their ecological risks in seven major river systems of China. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 906, 167590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Du, M.; Wei, D.; Tan, Z.; Lin, A.; Du, Y. Predicted no-effect concentrations for mercury species and ecological risk assessment for mercury pollution in aquatic environment. J. Environ. Sci. 2015, 28, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Jung, J.-W.; Park, J.-W.; Eo, S.; Choi, J.; Song, Y.K.; Cho, Y.; Hong, S.H.; Shim, W.J. Ecological risk assessment of microplastics in coastal, shelf, and deep sea waters with a consideration of environmentally relevant size and shape. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 270, 116217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Hela, D.G.; Lambropoulou, D.A.; Konstantinou, I.K.; Albanis, T.A. Environmental monitoring and ecological risk assessment for pesticide contamination and effects in Lake Pamvotis, northwestern Greece. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2005, 24, 1548–1556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Adu, J.T.; Kumarasamy, M.V. Assessing Non-Point Source Pollution Models: A Review. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2018, 27, 1913–1922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Liu, L.; Xu, W.; Wen, Z.; Liu, P.; Xu, H.; Liu, S.; Lu, X.K.; Zhong, B.Q.; Guo, Y.X.; Lu, X.; et al. Modeling global oceanic nitrogen deposition from food systems and its mitigation potential by reducing overuse of fertilizers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2023, 120, e2221459120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Deng, O.P.; Huang, S.; Wang, C.; Wei, Y.C.; Xia, Y.Q.; Liu, Z.H.; Zhang, X.M.; Xiao, W.; He, T.T.; Wu, X.B.; et al. Atmospheric Nitrogen Pollution Control Benefits the Coastal Environment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 58, 449–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Evangeliou, N.; Tichy, O.; Eckhardt, S.; Zwaaftink, C.G.; Brahney, J. Sources and fate of atmospheric microplastics revealed from inverse and dispersion modelling: From global emissions to deposition. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 432, 128585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Ji, X.W.; Abakumov, E.; Xie, X.C. Atmosphere-ocean exchange of heavy metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the Russian Arctic Ocean. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2019, 19, 13789–13807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. da Costa Filho, B.M.; Duarte, A.C.; Rocha-Santos, T.A.P. Environmental monitoring approaches for the detection of organic contaminants in marine environments: A critical review. Trends Environ. Anal. Chem. 2022, 33, e00154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Aves, A.R.; Revell, L.E.; Gaw, S.; Ruffell, H.; Schuddeboom, A.; Wotherspoon, N.E.; LaRue, M.; McDonald, A.J. First evidence of microplastics in Antarctic snow. Cryosphere 2022, 16, 2127–2145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Jung, J.; Han, B.; Rodriguez, B.; Miyazaki, Y.; Chung, H.Y.; Kim, K.; Choi, J.O.; Park, K.; Kim, I.N.; Kim, S.; et al. Atmospheric Dry Deposition of Water-Soluble Nitrogen to the Subarctic Western North Pacific Ocean during Summer. Atmosphere 2019, 10, 351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Seok, M.-W.; Kim, D.; Park, G.-H.; Lee, K.; Kim, T.-H.; Jung, J.; Kim, K.; Park, K.-T.; Kim, Y.-H.; Mo, A.; et al. Atmospheric deposition of inorganic nutrients to the Western North Pacific Ocean. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 793, 148401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Fowler, D.; Pyle, J.A.; Raven, J.A.; Sutton, M.A. The global nitrogen cycle in the twenty-first century: Introduction. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 2013, 368, 20130165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Violaki, K.; Tsiodra, I.; Nenes, A.; Tsagkaraki, M.; Kouvarakis, G.; Zarmpas, P.; Florou, K.; Panagiotopoulos, C.; Ingall, E.; Weber, R.; et al. Water soluble reactive phosphate (SRP) in atmospheric particles over East Mediterranean: The importance of dust and biomass burning events. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 830, 154263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Jiang, F.; Gao, C.; Chan, A.W.H.; Topping, D.O.; Zhang, H.; Li, W.; Coe, H.; Liu, X.; Ching, J.; Zheng, Z. A Review of Atmospheric Micro/Nanoplastics: Insights into Source and Fate for Modelling Studies. Curr. Pollut. Rep. 2025, 11, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Woodall, L.C.; Sanchez-Vidal, A.; Canals, M.; Paterson, G.L.J.; Coppock, R.; Sleight, V.; Calafat, A.; Rogers, A.D.; Narayanaswamy, B.E.; Thompson, R.C. The deep sea is a major sink for microplastic debris. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2014, 1, 140317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. De Rosa, E.; Montuori, P.; Triassi, M.; Masucci, A.; Nardone, A. Occurrence and Distribution of Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) from Sele River, Southern Italy: Analysis of Polychlorinated Biphenyls and Organochlorine Pesticides in a Water-Sediment System. Toxics 2022, 10, 662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Zuo, Z.-C.; Liu, S.-S.; He, Z.; Yang, G.-P. Occurrence, spatial and temporal distribution, sources and ecological risk assessment of halogenated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (HPAHs) in sediments of the East China Sea. Environ. Pollut. 2025, 384, 127021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Grannas, A.M.; Bogdal, C.; Hageman, K.J.; Halsall, C.; Harner, T.; Hung, H.; Kallenborn, R.; Klán, P.; Klánová, J.; Macdonald, R.W.; et al. The role of the global cryosphere in the fate of organic contaminants. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2013, 13, 3271–3305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Ding, X.; Guo, X.; Gao, H.; Gao, J.; Shi, J.; Yu, X.; Wu, Z. Seasonal variations of nutrient concentrations and their ratios in the central Bohai Sea. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 799, 149416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Wei, Y.; Song, L.; Ma, Y.; Mu, J.; Yi, W.; Sun, J.; Qu, K.; Cui, Z. Implications of ocean warming and acidification on heavy metals in surface seawater of the Bohai Sea. J. Hazard. Mater. 2024, 477, 135305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Spilling, K.; Vanharanta, M.; Santoro, M.; Villena-Alemany, C.; Labrenz, M.; Grossart, H.P.; Piwosz, K. Picophytoplankton act as the primary consumers of excess phosphorus after the spring bloom in the eutrophic Baltic Sea. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2025, 70, S55–S68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Wang, J.; Yu, Z.; Wei, Q.; Yao, Q. Long-Term Nutrient Variations in the Bohai Sea Over the Past 40 Years. J. Geophys. Res.-Ocean. 2019, 124, 703–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Sonke, J.E.; Angot, H.; Zhang, Y.X.; Poulain, A.; Björn, E.; Schartup, A. Global change effects on biogeochemical mercury cycling. Ambio 2023, 52, 853–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Wu, Y.-S.; Osman, A.I.; Hosny, M.; Elgarahy, A.M.; Eltaweil, A.S.; Rooney, D.W.; Chen, Z.; Rahim, N.S.; Sekar, M.; Gopinath, S.C.B.; et al. The Toxicity of Mercury and Its Chemical Compounds: Molecular Mechanisms and Environmental and Human Health Implications: A Comprehensive Review. Acs Omega 2024, 9, 5100–5126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Della Torre, C.; Bergami, E.; Salvati, A.; Faleri, C.; Cirino, P.; Dawson, K.A.; Corsi, I. Accumulation and Embryotoxicity of Polystyrene Nanoparticles at Early Stage of Development of Sea Urchin Embryos Paracentrotus lividus. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 12302–12311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Cole, M.; Lindeque, P.; Halsband, C.; Galloway, T.S. Microplastics as contaminants in the marine environment: A review. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2011, 62, 2588–2597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Amelia, T.S.M.; Khalik, W.; Ong, M.C.; Shao, Y.T.; Pan, H.J.; Bhubalan, K. Marine microplastics as vectors of major ocean pollutants and its hazards to the marine ecosystem and humans. Prog. Earth Planet. Sci. 2021, 8, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Wright, S.L.; Kelly, F.J. Plastic and Human Health: A Micro Issue? Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 6634–6647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Li, J.; Zhang, G.; Li, X.D.; Qi, S.H.; Liu, G.Q.; Peng, X.Z. Source seasonality of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in a subtropical city, Guangzhou, South China. Sci. Total Environ. 2006, 355, 145–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Kourtchev, I.; McGillen, M.R.; Wenger, J.; Donahue, N.M. Rethinking environmental boundaries for contaminants of emerging concern. Atmos. Environ. 2025, 361, 121492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Summary and analysis of the reviewed literature. Circle size indicates the number of publications. (A) Temporal characteristics: red for long-term monitoring; blue for short-term monitoring. (B) Methodological approaches: green for model-derived values; purple for measured values.
Figure 1. Summary and analysis of the reviewed literature. Circle size indicates the number of publications. (A) Temporal characteristics: red for long-term monitoring; blue for short-term monitoring. (B) Methodological approaches: green for model-derived values; purple for measured values.
Jmse 14 00483 g001
Figure 2. Atmospheric concentrations and deposition fluxes of various substances over the global ocean. Data from the literature were obtained through ship-based and coastal atmospheric samplers. (A) NO3-N, NH4-N, nmol·m−3; (B) PO4-P, nmol·m−3; (C) Fe, nmol·m−2·d−1; (D) Hg, ng·m−3; (E) Microplastics, item·100 m−3; (F) POPs, ng·m−3. Note: For better visualization, microplastic abundance in this figure is presented as item·100 m−3. The underlying data and exact values for each region are available in Supplementary Materials S3.
Figure 2. Atmospheric concentrations and deposition fluxes of various substances over the global ocean. Data from the literature were obtained through ship-based and coastal atmospheric samplers. (A) NO3-N, NH4-N, nmol·m−3; (B) PO4-P, nmol·m−3; (C) Fe, nmol·m−2·d−1; (D) Hg, ng·m−3; (E) Microplastics, item·100 m−3; (F) POPs, ng·m−3. Note: For better visualization, microplastic abundance in this figure is presented as item·100 m−3. The underlying data and exact values for each region are available in Supplementary Materials S3.
Jmse 14 00483 g002
Figure 3. Seasonal distribution of substances deposition. (A) Concentration; (B) flux.
Figure 3. Seasonal distribution of substances deposition. (A) Concentration; (B) flux.
Jmse 14 00483 g003
Figure 4. Atmospheric deposition of substances in the Bohai Sea (AF) and Baltic Sea (GK) in different seasons.
Figure 4. Atmospheric deposition of substances in the Bohai Sea (AF) and Baltic Sea (GK) in different seasons.
Jmse 14 00483 g004
Figure 5. Variation in substances with distance from the shore. (A) PO4-P; (B) NH4-N; (C) POPs; (D) Fe (deposition flux); (E) microplastics, ng·m−3. The null hypothesis (y = 0) implies that distance from the shore does not affect substance concentrations. At the 0.05 level, the fitting function is significantly better than the function y = 0.
Figure 5. Variation in substances with distance from the shore. (A) PO4-P; (B) NH4-N; (C) POPs; (D) Fe (deposition flux); (E) microplastics, ng·m−3. The null hypothesis (y = 0) implies that distance from the shore does not affect substance concentrations. At the 0.05 level, the fitting function is significantly better than the function y = 0.
Jmse 14 00483 g005
Figure 6. Ecological risk assessment of substances. Circle size indicates RQ values and colors denote different substance categories.
Figure 6. Ecological risk assessment of substances. Circle size indicates RQ values and colors denote different substance categories.
Jmse 14 00483 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lin, Q.; Yi, X.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhan, J. Atmospheric Deposition of Multi-Class Substances into the Ocean: Synthesis of Fluxes, Seasonal Spatial Patterns and Ecological Risks. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2026, 14, 483. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse14050483

AMA Style

Lin Q, Yi X, Wang J, Zhang Y, Zhan J. Atmospheric Deposition of Multi-Class Substances into the Ocean: Synthesis of Fluxes, Seasonal Spatial Patterns and Ecological Risks. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2026; 14(5):483. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse14050483

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lin, Qinghao, Xianliang Yi, Junyi Wang, Yiwen Zhang, and Jingjing Zhan. 2026. "Atmospheric Deposition of Multi-Class Substances into the Ocean: Synthesis of Fluxes, Seasonal Spatial Patterns and Ecological Risks" Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 14, no. 5: 483. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse14050483

APA Style

Lin, Q., Yi, X., Wang, J., Zhang, Y., & Zhan, J. (2026). Atmospheric Deposition of Multi-Class Substances into the Ocean: Synthesis of Fluxes, Seasonal Spatial Patterns and Ecological Risks. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 14(5), 483. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse14050483

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop