Mating Modifies the Survival and Oviposition of Tetranychus merganser Boudreaux (Acari: Tetranychidae) Females on Five Host Plants
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Spider Mite Collection
2.2. Host Plants
2.3. Mites Age Standardization
2.4. Experimental Arena
2.5. Data Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Females
3.2. Males
3.3. Longevity
3.4. Mortality
3.5. Fecundity
4. Discussion
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Migeon, A.; Dorkeld, F. Spider Mites Web: A Comprehensive Database for the Tetranychidae. 2025. Available online: https://www1.montpellier.inrae.fr/CBGP/spmweb (accessed on 21 January 2026).
- Alfaro-Valle, E.; Martínez-Hernández, A.; Otero-Colina, G.; Lara-Reyna, J. High susceptibility of Tetranychus merganser (Acari: Tetranychidae), an emergent pest of the tropical crop Carica papaya, towards Metarhizium anisopliae s.l. and Beauveria bassianas trains. PeerJ 2022, 10, e14064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rocandio-Rodríguez, M.; Torres-Castillo, J.A.; Juárez-Aragón, M.C.; Chacón-Hernández, J.C.; Moreno-Ramírez, Y.d.R.; Mora-Ravelo, S.G.; Delgado-Martínez, R.; Hernández-Juárez, A.; Heinz-Castro, R.T.Q.; Reyes-Zepeda, F. Evaluation of resistance of eleven maize races (Zea mays L.) to the red spider mite (Tetranychus merganser, Boudreaux). Plants 2022, 11, 1414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Guerrero-Vázquez, I.C.; Chacón-Hernández, J.C.; Torres-Castillo, J.A.; Juárez-Aragón, M.C.; Rocandio-Rodríguez, M.; Segura-Martinez, M.T.d.J.; Hernández-Juarez, A.; Moreno-Ramírez, Y.R. Evaluation of the resistance of four tomato varieties to the possible attack of Tetranychus merganser. Southwest. Entomol. 2025, 50, 1533–1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reyes-Pérez, N.; Villanueva-Jiménez, J.A.; de-la-Cruz-Vargas-Mendoza, M.; Cabrera-Mireles, H.; Otero-Colina, G. Parámetros poblacionales de Tetranychus merganser Boudreaux (Acari: Tetranychidae) en papayo (Carica papaya L.) a diferentes temperaturas. Agrociencia 2013, 47, 147–157. [Google Scholar]
- Segura-Martínez, M.T.d.J.; Ordaz-Silva, S.; Hernández-Juárez, A.; Heinz-Castro, R.T.Q.; Mora-Ravelo, S.G.; Chacón-Hernández, J.C. Life table parameters of Tetranychus merganser Boudreaux (Acari: Tetranychidae) on five host plants. Insects 2023, 14, 473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ullah, M.S.; Moriya, D.; Kongchuensin, M.; Konvipasruang, P.; Gotoh, T. Comparative toxicity of acaricides to Tetranychus merganser Boudreaux and Tetranychus kanzawai Kishida (Acari: Tetranychidae). Int. J. Acarol. 2011, 37, 535–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ullah, M.S.; Moriya, D.; Badii, M.H.; Nachman, G.; Gotoh, T.A. Comparative study of development and demographic parameters of Tetranychus merganser and Tetranychus kanzawai (Acari: Tetranychidae) at different temperatures. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2011, 54, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Macke, E.; Magalhães, S.; Khanh, H.D.-T.; Frantz, A.; Facon, B.; Olivieri, S. Mating modifies female life history in a haplodiploid spider mite. Am. Nat. 2012, 179, 147–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, G.Y.; Zhang, Z.Q. Does size matter? Fecundity and longevity of spider mites (Tetranychus urticae) in relation to mating and food availability. Syst. Appl. Acarol. 2018, 23, 1796–1808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, G.Y.; Zhang, Z.Q. The costs of social interaction on survival and reproduction of arrhenotokous spider mite Tetranychus urticae. Entomol. Gen. 2021, 41, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Treviño-Barbosa, G.; Ordaz-Silva, S.; Gaona-García, G.; Hernández-Juárez, A.; Mora-Ravelo, S.G.; Chacón Hernández, J.C. The resistance of seven host plants to Tetranychus merganser Boudreaux (Acari: Tetranychidae). Insects 2022, 13, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Carey, J.R. Applied Demography for Biologists: With Special Emphasis on Insects; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1993; p. 206. [Google Scholar]
- Carey, J.R. Insect biodemography. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2001, 46, 79–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bouras, S.L.; Papadoulis, G.T. Influence of selected fruit tree pollen on life history of Euseius stipulatus (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2005, 36, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pinder, J.E.; Wiener, J.G.; Smith, M.H. The Weibull distribution: A new method of summarizing survivorship data. Ecology 1978, 59, 175–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schabenberger, O.; Pierce, F.J. Contemporary Statistical Models for the Plant and Soil Sciences; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2002; p. 760. [Google Scholar]
- Julious, S.A. Using confidence intervals around individual means to assess statistical significance between two means. Pharm. Stat. 2004, 3, 217–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Méndez, I.R.; Namihira, D.G.; Moreno, L.A.; Sosa, C. El Protocolo de Investigación; Editorial Trillas: Mexico City, Mexico, 1984; pp. 178–188. [Google Scholar]
- Vaupel, J.W. How change in age-specific mortality affects life expectancy. Popul. Stud. J. Demogr. 1986, 40, 147–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2025; Available online: https://www.R-project.org/ (accessed on 21 May 2025).
- Rabinovich, J.E.; Nieves, E.L.; Chaves, L.F. Age-specific mortality analysis of the dry forest kissing bug, Rhodnius neglectus. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2010, 135, 252–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Q.; Yu, G.; Cheng, X.; Gao, Y.; Fan, X.; Yang, D.; Xie, M.; Wang, T.; Piper, M.D.W.; Yang, M. Sexual dimorphism in the nutritional requirement for adult lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster. Aging Cell 2020, 19, e13120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, G.Y.; Zhang, Z.Q. The sex- and duration-dependent effects of intermittent fasting on lifespan and reproduction of spider mite Tetranychus urticae. Front. Zool. 2019, 16, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, G.Y.; Zhang, Z.Q. Sex dimorphism of life-history traits and their response to environmental factors in spider mites. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2021, 84, 497–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]




| Host Plant | Mating State | Parameters | LT50-P | LT50-E | Seudo-R2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| c | CI 95% | b | CI 95% | |||||
| Phaseolus vulgaris | Mated | 4.2143 | 3.7781–4.6505 | 17.4624 a B | 17.1365–17.7881 | 17 | 16–17 | 0.9914 |
| Virgin | 3.6252 | 3.4409–3.8094 | 20.2617 y A | 20.0498–20.4736 | 18–19 | 18–19 | 0.9970 | |
| Carica papaya | Mated | 3.7910 | 3.5134–4.0686 | 16.5764 b B | 16.3356–16.8172 | 16 | 15–16 | 0.9956 |
| Virgin | 3.0091 | 2.8019–3.2162 | 21.4906 z A | 21.1418–21.8393 | 19 | 20–21 | 0.9925 | |
| Capsicum annuum var. glabriusculum | Mated | 2.8068 | 2.5390–3.0745 | 16.5795 b B | 16.1744–16.9845 | 15–16 | 15–16 | 0.9891 |
| Virgin | 2.3820 | 2.2107–2.5533 | 18.8700 x A | 18.4755–19.2645 | 16–17 | 17–18 | 0.9917 | |
| Rosa hybrida | Mated | 3.2237 | 2.8997–3.5475 | 16.0128 bc B | 15.6442–16.3813 | 15–16 | 15–16 | 0.9905 |
| Virgin | 3.0001 | 2.8182–3.1819 | 19.2532 x A | 18.9702–19.5362 | 17 | 17–18 | 0.9951 | |
| Helietta parvifolia | Mated | 2.8113 | 2.4799–3.1426 | 15.2197 c B | 14.7562–15.6832 | 14–15 | 15–16 | 0.9860 |
| Virgin | 3.5938 | 3.3316–3.8559 | 17.7957 w A | 17.5254–18.0658 | 16–17 | 17–18 | 0.9951 | |
| Host Plant | Mated Status | Parameters | LT50-P | LT50-E | Pseudo-R2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| c | CI 95% | b | CI 95% | |||||
| Phaseolus vulgaris | Mated | 4.3754 | 4.0737–4.6769 | 30.6392 b B | 30.2716–31.0068 | 29–30 | 28–29 | 0.9928 |
| Virgin | 4.7859 | 4.5255–5.0461 | 33.8606 y A | 33.5657–34.1555 | 31–32 | 33–34 | 0.995 | |
| Carica papaya | Mated | 3.8092 | 3.5528–4.0654 | 33.2251 a B | 32.7938–33.6563 | 31–32 | 31–32 | 0.9904 |
| Virgin | 4.0335 | 3.8172–4.2496 | 36.6517 z A | 36.2956–37.0077 | 33–34 | 34–35 | 0.9931 | |
| Capsicum annuum var. glabriusculum | Mated | 2.5589 | 2.4000–2.7178 | 22.4063 d B | 22.0146–22.7979 | 20–21 | 20–21 | 0.9934 |
| Virgin | 2.9326 | 2.8280–3.0371 | 27.3099 x A | 27.0676–27.5522 | 24–25 | 25–26 | 0.9975 | |
| Rosa hybrida | Mated | 2.971 | 2.8235–3.1185 | 24.0379 c B | 23.7435–24.3323 | 22–23 | 22–23 | 0.9961 |
| Virgin | 3.4869 | 3.2609–3.7128 | 27.3157 x A | 26.9371–27.6942 | 24–25 | 25–26 | 0.9935 | |
| Helietta parvifolia | Mated | 1.9419 | 1.8280–2.0559 | 17.7671 e B | 17.3926–18.1416 | 15–16 | 16–17 | 0.9935 |
| Virgin | 2.4766 | 2.3402–2.6131 | 22.7271 w A | 22.3643–23.0899 | 19–20 | 21–22 | 0.9944 | |
| Host Plant | Mated Status | Longevity | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | Male | ||
| Phaseolus vulgaris | Mated | 15.87 | 27.91 |
| Virgin | 18.26 | 31.01 | |
| Carica papaya | Mated | 14.97 | 30.03 |
| Virgin | 19.19 | 33.24 | |
| Capsicum annuum var. glabriusculum | Mated | 14.76 | 19.89 |
| Virgin | 16.72 | 24.36 | |
| Rosa hybrida | Mated | 14.34 | 21.45 |
| Virgin | 17.19 | 24.57 | |
| Helietta parvifolia | Mated | 13.55 | 15.75 |
| Virgin | 16.03 | 20.16 | |
| Host Plant | Sex | Mated Status | n | Parameters | R2 | p Value | Equation | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ln(a) | ±SE | b | ±SE | Doubling Time | |||||||
| Phaseolus vulgaris | Female | Mated | 14 | −4.6269 | 0.4822 | 0.1673 | 0.0301 | 4.1422 | 0.7202 | 0.0001 | Equation (3) |
| Virgin | 16 | −4.5134 | 0.2005 | 0.1492 | 0.0112 | 4.6446 | 0.9264 | <0.0001 | Equation (2) | ||
| Male | Mated | 17 | −5.0673 | 0.4923 | 0.1115 | 0.0184 | 6.2148 | 0.7098 | <0.0001 | Equation (2) | |
| Virgin | 28 | −6.2263 | 0.2845 | 0.1255 | 0.0099 | 5.5236 | 0.8615 | <0.0001 | Equation (3) | ||
| Carica papaya | Female | Mated | 16 | −4.8504 | 0.3968 | 0.1859 | 0.0278 | 3.7277 | 0.7614 | <0.0001 | Equation (3) |
| Virgin | 19 | −4.4660 | 0.2055 | 0.1316 | 0.0113 | 5.2677 | 0.8884 | <0.0001 | Equation (2) | ||
| Male | Mated | 24 | −5.3450 | 0.3824 | 0.0975 | 0.0127 | 7.1106 | 0.7270 | <0.0001 | Equation (3) | |
| Virgin | 17 | −5.1342 | 0.2892 | 0.0965 | 0.0089 | 7.1831 | 0.8857 | <0.0001 | Equation (2) | ||
| Capsicum annuum var. glabriusculum | Female | Mated | 14 | −4.0931 | 0.3211 | 0.1648 | 0.0232 | 4.2045 | 0.8080 | <0.0001 | Equation (2) |
| Virgin | 19 | −3.6126 | 0.1995 | 0.0879 | 0.0117 | 7.8811 | 0.7671 | <0.0001 | Equation (2) | ||
| Male | Mated | 26 | −4.4023 | 0.2537 | 0.0997 | 0.0122 | 6.9524 | 0.7351 | <0.0001 | Equation (3) | |
| Virgin | 22 | −4.3175 | 0.1917 | 0.0887 | 0.0079 | 7.8112 | 0.8627 | <0.0001 | Equation (2) | ||
| Rosa hybrida | Female | Mated | 14 | −4.1558 | 0.3289 | 0.1714 | 0.0233 | 4.0431 | 0.8174 | <0.0001 | Equation (2) |
| Virgin | 23 | −4.6670 | 0.2120 | 0.1390 | 0.0129 | 4.9861 | 0.8463 | <0.0001 | Equation (3) | ||
| Male | Mated | 26 | −4.6493 | 0.2109 | 0.1049 | 0.0101 | 6.6082 | 0.8174 | <0.0001 | Equation (3) | |
| Virgin | 28 | −5.2594 | 0.2315 | 0.1175 | 0.0101 | 5.897 | 0.8392 | <0.0001 | Equation (3) | ||
| Helietta parvifolia | Female | Mated | 17 | −4.3161 | 0.3486 | 0.1730 | 0.0269 | 4.0062 | 0.7340 | <0.0001 | Equation (3) |
| Virgin | 20 | −5.0194 | 0.1525 | 0.1915 | 0.0104 | 3.6199 | 0.9497 | <0.0001 | Equation (3) | ||
| Male | Mated | 17 | −3.5744 | 0.2054 | 0.1059 | 0.0128 | 6.5455 | 0.8206 | <0.0001 | Equation (2) | |
| Virgin | 23 | −4.0129 | 0.1643 | 0.0910 | 0.0082 | 7.6155 | 0.8543 | <0.0001 | Equation (2) | ||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Aldape-Rodríguez, E.; Chacón-Hernández, J.C.; Ordaz-Silva, S.; Moreno-Ramírez, Y.d.R.; López-Sánchez, I.V.; Rocandio-Rodríguez, M.; Hernández-Juárez, A.; Mora-Ravelo, S.G. Mating Modifies the Survival and Oviposition of Tetranychus merganser Boudreaux (Acari: Tetranychidae) Females on Five Host Plants. Agriculture 2026, 16, 507. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16050507
Aldape-Rodríguez E, Chacón-Hernández JC, Ordaz-Silva S, Moreno-Ramírez YdR, López-Sánchez IV, Rocandio-Rodríguez M, Hernández-Juárez A, Mora-Ravelo SG. Mating Modifies the Survival and Oviposition of Tetranychus merganser Boudreaux (Acari: Tetranychidae) Females on Five Host Plants. Agriculture. 2026; 16(5):507. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16050507
Chicago/Turabian StyleAldape-Rodríguez, Ernesto, Julio César Chacón-Hernández, Salvador Ordaz-Silva, Yolanda del Rocío Moreno-Ramírez, Imelda Virginia López-Sánchez, Mario Rocandio-Rodríguez, Agustín Hernández-Juárez, and Sandra Grisell Mora-Ravelo. 2026. "Mating Modifies the Survival and Oviposition of Tetranychus merganser Boudreaux (Acari: Tetranychidae) Females on Five Host Plants" Agriculture 16, no. 5: 507. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16050507
APA StyleAldape-Rodríguez, E., Chacón-Hernández, J. C., Ordaz-Silva, S., Moreno-Ramírez, Y. d. R., López-Sánchez, I. V., Rocandio-Rodríguez, M., Hernández-Juárez, A., & Mora-Ravelo, S. G. (2026). Mating Modifies the Survival and Oviposition of Tetranychus merganser Boudreaux (Acari: Tetranychidae) Females on Five Host Plants. Agriculture, 16(5), 507. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16050507

