Early-Season Rice Varieties with Low Amylose Content Can Achieve Low Chalkiness and Comparable Yield to High-Amylose Ones in the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Experimental Design
2.2. Sampling and Measurements
2.2.1. Dry Matter Accumulation and Leaf Area Index (LAI)
2.2.2. Canopy Light Interception and Radiation Use Efficiency (RUE)
2.2.3. Grain Yield and Its Components
2.2.4. Grain Quality
2.2.5. Grain-Filling and Amylose Accumulation Dynamics
2.2.6. Enzyme Activities in Starch Synthesis
2.3. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Distribution of AC in Early-Season Rice Varieties Released from 2000 to 2022 and Its Correlation with Yield- and Quality-Related Traits
3.2. Grain Yield and Yield Components of Early-Season Rice Varieties with Contrasting AC
3.3. Processing and Appearance Quality
3.4. Correlations of AC with Yield, Yield Components, and Rice Quality
3.5. Grain-Filling and Amylose Accumulation Characteristics, and Starch Synthesis-Related Enzyme Activities
4. Discussion
4.1. Prevalence of High-Amylose Varieties: A Consequence of Historical Breeding Objectives, Market Demand, and Farmer Practices
4.2. Mechanisms Underlying Yield Stability
4.3. Physiological Characteristics Associated with Low Chalkiness
4.4. Limitations and Future Perspectives
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Bandumula, N. Rice production in Asia: Key to global food security. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. India Sect. B Biol. Sci. 2018, 88, 1323–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, L.; Risalat, H.; Cao, R.; Hu, Q.; Pan, X.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, G. Food security in China: A brief view of rice production in recent 20 years. Foods 2022, 11, 3324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, M.; Chen, J.; Cao, F. Estimating the expected planting area of double- and single-season rice in the Hunan-Jiangxi region of China by 2030. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 6207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, T.; Zhong, T. Changing rice cropping patterns and their impact on food security in southern China. Food Secur. 2022, 14, 907–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, M.; Xiao, Z.; Chen, J.; Cao, F. Yield and quality of brown rice noodles processed from early-season rice grains. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 18668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Huang, G.; Guo, L.; Zeng, Y.; Huang, S.; Zeng, Y.; Xie, X. Changes in the grain yield and quality of early indica rice from 2000 to 2020 in southern China. Agronomy 2024, 14, 295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H.; Wang, T.; Deng, F.; Yang, F.; Zhong, X.; Li, Q.; Ren, W. Changes in chemical composition and starch structure in rice noodle cultivar influence Rapid Visco analysis and texture analysis profiles under shading. Food Chem. X 2022, 14, 100360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, H.; Peng, Y.; He, Y. Rice appearance quality. In Rice; AACC International Press: Saint Paul, MN, USA, 2019; pp. 371–383. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou, L.; Liang, S.; Ponce, K.; Marundon, S.; Ye, G.; Zhao, X. Factors affecting head rice yield and chalkiness in indica rice. Field Crops Res. 2015, 172, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pang, Y.; Ali, J.; Wang, X.; Franje, N.J.; Revilleza, J.E.; Xu, J.; Li, Z. Relationship of rice grain amylose, gelatinization temperature and pasting properties for breeding better eating and cooking quality of rice varieties. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0168483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, I.; Khush, G.S.; Juliano, B.O. Genetic analysis of waxy locus in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 1987, 73, 481–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bao, J.; Shen, S.; Sun, M.; Corke, H. Analysis of genotypic diversity in the starch physicochemical properties of nonwaxy rice: Apparent amylose content, pasting viscosity and gel texture. Starch/Stärke 2006, 58, 259–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, R.; Hu, Q.; Meng, X.; Zhang, Y.; Shuai, X.; Gu, Y.; Li, Y.; Chen, M.; Wang, B.; Cao, Y. Effects of high temperature on grain quality and enzyme activity in heat-sensitive versus heat-tolerant rice cultivars. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2024, 104, 9729–9741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, L.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, C.; Liu, Q. Genetic manipulation of endosperm amylose for designing superior quality rice to meet the demands in the 21st century. J. Cereal Sci. 2022, 105, 103481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Zhang, M.; Xiao, Z.; Liu, L.; Cao, F.; Chen, J.; Huang, M. Relationships between texture properties of cooked rice with grain amylose and protein content in high eating quality indica rice. Cereal Chem. 2024, 101, 577–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmed, N.; Tetlow, I.J.; Nawaz, S.; Iqbal, A.; Mubin, M.; Rehman, M.S.N.U.; Butt, A.; Lightfoot, D.A.; Maekawa, M. Effect of high temperature on grain filling period, yield, amylose content and activity of starch biosynthesis enzymes in endosperm of basmati rice. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2014, 95, 2237–2243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xu, Y.; Chu, C.; Yao, S. The impact of high-temperature stress on rice: Challenges and solutions. Crop J. 2021, 9, 963–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.; Han, S.; Makowski, D.; Wang, X.; Fu, Z.; Ciais, P. Response of rice quality to climate warming: A meta-analysis. Field Crops Res. 2025, 331, 109995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhong, L.; Cheng, F.; Wen, X.; Sun, Z.; Zhang, G.P. Deterioration of eating and cooking quality caused by high temperature during grain filling in early-season indica rice cultivars. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2005, 191, 218–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.; Huang, M.; Wei, Y.; Chen, J.; Shan, S.; Cao, F.; Chen, G.; Zou, Y. Amylose content and starch granule size in rice grains are affected by growing season. Phyton-Int. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 88, 403–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, Y.; Tang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Liu, S.; Liang, X.; Li, M.; Li, R. Variations and trends in rice quality across different types of approved varieties in China, 1978–2022. Agronomy 2024, 14, 1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alam, M.; Lou, G.; Abbas, W.; Osti, R.; Ahmad, A.; Bista, S.; Ahiakpa, J.K.; He, Y. Improving rice grain quality through ecotype breeding for enhancing food and nutritional security in Asia-Pacific region. Rice 2024, 17, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, X.; Li, Y.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, C.; Li, E.; Li, Q.; Tao, K.; Yu, W.; Wang, J.; Chen, Z.; et al. The interaction between amylose and amylopectin synthesis in rice endosperm grown at high temperature. Food Chem. 2019, 301, 125258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, M.; Jiang, P.; Shan, S.; Gao, W.; GuoHui, M.; Zou, Y.; Uphoff, N.; Yuan, L. Higher yields of hybrid rice do not depend on nitrogen fertilization under moderate to high soil fertility conditions. Rice 2017, 10, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, X.; Ren, Y.; Dong, H.; Jiang, X.; Zheng, X.; Duan, E.; Teng, X.; Wang, Y.; Gu, C.; Chen, R.; et al. Natural variation in OsTPS8 confers differential regulation of chalkiness and seed vigor in indica and japonica rice. Nat. Genet. 2025, 58, 206–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, H.; Li, Y.; Zeng, J.; Cao, Y.; Zhang, T.; Chen, G.; Wang, Y. Comparative quality evaluation of physicochemical and amylose content profiling in rice noodles from diverse rice hybrids in China. Agriculture 2023, 13, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zainab, S.; Zhou, X.; Zhang, Y.; Tanweer, S.; Mehmood, T. Suitability of early indica rice for the preparation of rice noodles by its starch properties analysis. Food Chem. X 2024, 24, 101921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, X.; Zhao, Y.; Nie, W.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Chen, K.; Yu, N.; Luan, X.; Li, W.; et al. Historical trends analysis of main agronomic traits in South China inbred indica rice varieties since dwarf breeding. Agronomy 2023, 138, 2159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gauch, H.G.; Piepho, H.P.; Annicchiarico, P. Statistical analysis of yield trials by AMMI and GGE: Further considerations. Crop Sci. 2008, 48, 866–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malosetti, M.; Ribaut, J.M.; van Eeuwijk, F.A. The statistical analysis of multi-environment data: Modeling genotype-by-environment interaction and its genetic basis. Front. Physiol. 2013, 4, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, Y.; Cong, S.; Zhang, H. Comparison of the grain quality and starch physicochemical properties between japonica rice cultivars with different contents of amylose, as affected by nitrogen fertilization. Agriculture 2021, 11, 616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, M.; Shan, S.; Zhou, X.; Chen, J.; Cao, F.; Jiang, L.; Zou, Y. Agronomic performance of late-season rice in South China. Plant Prod. Sci. 2017, 21, 32–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lü, J.; Wang, D.; Liu, K.; Chu, G.; Huang, L.; Tian, X.; Zhang, Y. Inbred varieties outperformed hybrid rice varieties under dense planting with reducing nitrogen. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 8769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, M.; Zhang, W.; Jiang, L.; Zou, Y. Impact of temperature changes on early-rice productivity in a subtropical environment of China. Field Crops Res. 2013, 146, 10–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, A.; Li, J.; Long, J.; Ai, Z.; Zhang, P.; Guo, X. Spatial and temporal variations of climate resources during the growing season of early-season rice in Hunan province. Agriculture 2024, 14, 1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gu, J.; Yin, X.; Stomph, T.J.; Struik, P.C. Can exploiting natural genetic variation in leaf photosynthesis contribute to increasing rice productivity? A simulation analysis. Plant Cell Environ. 2014, 37, 22–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gu, J.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, H.; Li, Z.; Zhou, Q.; Yu, C.; Kong, X.; Liu, L.; Wang, Z.; Yang, J. Canopy light and nitrogen distributions are related to grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency in rice. Field Crops Res. 2017, 206, 74–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, W.; Yin, X.; Struik, P.C.; Solis, C.; Xie, F.; Schmidt, R.C.; Huang, M.; Zou, Y.; Ye, C.; Jagadish, S.V.K. High day- and night-time temperatures affect grain growth dynamics in contrasting rice genotypes. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 5233–5245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, Y.; Wang, C.; Linderholm, H.W.; Fu, Y.; Cai, W.; Xu, J.; Zhuang, L.; Wu, M.; Shi, Y.; Wang, G.; et al. The negative impact of increasing temperatures on rice yields in southern China. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 820, 153262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jagadish, S.V.K.; Murty, M.V.R.; Quick, W.P. Rice responses to rising temperatures-challenges, perspectives and future directions. Plant Cell Environ. 2015, 38, 1686–1698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, T.; Li, G.; Ma, J.; Huang, H.; Fu, W.; Chen, T.; Wang, W.; Zeng, Y.; Chen, M.; Fu, G.; et al. ATP utilization efficiency plays a key role in determining rice quality under high-temperature conditions. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2025, 221, 109582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, F.; Duan, L.; Zou, L.; Wang, S.; Li, Y.; Tian, J.; Liu, D.; Zhang, Q.; et al. Effects of high temperature during the grain-filling stage on the photosynthetic performance, yield, and quality of early rice. Chin. J. Eco-Agric. 2025, 33, 80–94. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Wang, C.; Caragea, D.; Narayana, N.K.; Hein, N.T.; Bheemanahalli, R.; Somayanda, I.M.; Jagadish, S.V.K. Deep learning based high-throughput phenotyping of chalkiness in rice exposed to high night temperature. Plant Methods 2022, 18, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cai, Z.; Deng, Y.; Zhu, X.; Li, B.; Xu, C.; Li, D. High-throughput 3D rice chalkiness detection based on Micro-CT and VSE-UNet. Agronomy 2025, 15, 450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]





| AC (%) | Panicles m−2 | Spikelets per Panicle | Grain-Setting Rate (%) | 1000-Grain Weight (g) | Yield (t·hm−2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10–20 (n = 155) | 337.41 a | 113.52 a | 81.90 a | 26.03 c | 7.42 a |
| 20–25 (n = 148) | 332.86 ab | 113.93 a | 82.46 a | 26.50 b | 7.48 a |
| 25–28 (n = 31) | 323.66 b | 116.67 a | 81.93 a | 27.11 a | 7.55 a |
| AC (%) | HR (%) | LWR | CKR (%) | CKD (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10–20 (n = 155) | 52.58 a | 2.98 a | 53.71 b | 10.01 b |
| 20–25 (n = 148) | 53.12 a | 2.82 b | 74.39 a | 16.08 a |
| 25–28 (n = 31) | 50.24 a | 2.64 c | 83.44 a | 17.54 a |
| Year/Type | Varieties | Panicle m−2 | Spikelets per Panicle | Grain-Setting Rate (%) | 1000-Grain Weight (g) | Yield (t·hm−2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | ||||||
| MH-Am | JZ361 | 323.73 d | 115.27 b | 80.43 bc | 24.64 a | 7.64 b |
| ZJZ17 | 341.23 c | 126.90 a | 77.23 c | 24.04 b | 8.59 a | |
| ZLY171 | 334.47 c | 125.03 a | 81.77 b | 23.43 c | 8.52 a | |
| Mean | 333.14 B | 122.40 A | 79.81 A | 24.04 A | 8.25 A | |
| L-Am | XZX45 | 402.43 b | 93.03 d | 85.90 a | 23.59 c | 8.34 a |
| ZJZ29 | 415.83 a | 110.70 c | 72.60 d | 21.18 d | 7.77 b | |
| QLY2012 | 309.07 e | 126.17 a | 82.07 b | 24.76 a | 8.58 a | |
| Mean | 375.78 A | 109.97 A | 80.19 A | 23.18 B | 8.23 A | |
| 2022 | ||||||
| MH-Am | JZ361 | 327.16 d | 113.58 d | 82.62 b | 24.15 b | 8.13 d |
| ZJZ17 | 343.21 cd | 117.92 cd | 79.52 c | 24.94 a | 9.15 b | |
| ZLY171 | 348.15 c | 124.32 b | 85.56 a | 23.49 c | 10.00 a | |
| Mean | 339.51 B | 118.61 A | 82.56 A | 24.19 A | 9.10 A | |
| L-Am | XZX45 | 440.74 a | 94.25 e | 81.13 bc | 22.18 d | 8.14 d |
| ZJZ29 | 375.31 b | 123.14 bc | 80.74 bc | 20.63 e | 8.51 cd | |
| QLY2012 | 344.44 cd | 132.01 a | 74.71 d | 24.49 b | 8.96 bc | |
| Mean | 386.83 A | 116.47 A | 78.86 B | 22.43 B | 8.54 A | |
| Analysis of Variance | Year | * | ns | ns | ** | ** |
| Varieties | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | |
| Year × Varieties | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
| Year/Type | Varieties | HR (%) | LWR | CKR (%) | CKD (%) | AC (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | ||||||
| MH-Am | JZ361 | 56.33 a | 1.85 f | 94.78 a | 21.45 c | 23.80 ab |
| ZJZ17 | 55.41 a | 2.10 e | 96.95 a | 30.32 a | 26.12 a | |
| ZLY171 | 51.34 c | 2.27 d | 89.22 b | 26.44 b | 23.69 b | |
| Mean | 54.36 A | 2.07 B | 93.65 A | 26.07 A | 24.53 A | |
| L-Am | XZX45 | 48.89 d | 2.91 b | 30.47 c | 11.47 d | 18.96 c |
| ZJZ29 | 55.82 a | 3.08 a | 23.26 d | 9.70 e | 16.14 d | |
| QLY2012 | 52.25 b | 2.71 c | 28.24 c | 9.77 e | 17.71 cd | |
| Mean | 52.32 A | 2.90 A | 27.32 B | 10.42 B | 17.60 B | |
| 2022 | ||||||
| MH-Am | JZ361 | 57.12 a | 1.88 e | 94.19 a | 21.19 b | 25.72 b |
| ZJZ17 | 56.15 a | 2.10 d | 96.16 a | 29.05 c | 27.60 a | |
| ZLY171 | 51.98 b | 2.31 c | 88.96 b | 25.04 a | 25.37 b | |
| Mean | 55.09 A | 2.09 B | 93.10 A | 25.10 A | 26.23 A | |
| L-Am | XZX45 | 56.38 a | 3.04 a | 26.88 c | 9.98 d | 18.59 c |
| ZJZ29 | 55.54 a | 3.04 a | 24.08 c | 5.71 e | 17.26 d | |
| QLY2012 | 55.03 ab | 2.82 b | 23.15 c | 6.76 e | 17.32 d | |
| Mean | 55.65 A | 2.97 A | 24.70 B | 7.48 B | 17.72 B | |
| Analysis of Variance | Year | ** | ** | ** | ** | * |
| Varieties | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | |
| Year × Varieties | * | ** | ** | ns | ns |
| Type | Varieties | R2 | GFR0 (mg·Grain−1·d−1) | GFRmax (mg·Grain−1·d−1) | GFRmean (mg·Grain−1·d−1) | Tmax (d) | D (d) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MH-Am | JZ361 | 1.00 | 0.42 b | 1.12 a | 0.66 a | 10.04 d | 24.14 d |
| ZJZ17 | 1.00 | 0.45 a | 1.12 a | 0.68 a | 10.10 d | 24.82 d | |
| ZLY171 | 1.00 | 0.36 c | 0.84 b | 0.51 c | 12.01 b | 30.19 b | |
| Mean | 1.00 | 0.41 A | 1.03 A | 0.62 A | 10.72 A | 26.38 A | |
| L-Am | XZX45 | 0.99 | 0.30 d | 0.82 b | 0.48 d | 13.31 a | 31.47 a |
| ZJZ29 | 0.99 | 0.40 b | 0.83 b | 0.52 bc | 10.22 d | 27.25 c | |
| QLY2012 | 1.00 | 0.41 b | 0.86 b | 0.53 b | 11.18 c | 29.71 b | |
| Mean | 0.99 | 0.37 A | 0.84 B | 0.51 B | 11.57 A | 29.48 A |
| Type | Varieties | R2 | GAmR0 (mg·Grain−1·d−1) | GAmRmax (mg·Grain−1·d−1) | GAmRmean (mg·Grain−1·d−1) | Tmax (d) | D (d) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MH-Am | JZ361 | 1.00 | 0.0085 e | 0.2453 b | 0.1052 b | 12.54 d | 20.48 e |
| ZJZ17 | 1.00 | 0.0101 d | 0.2890 a | 0.1241 a | 12.38 d | 20.22 e | |
| ZLY171 | 1.00 | 0.0112 c | 0.1799 c | 0.0824 c | 13.42 bc | 23.15 d | |
| Mean | 1.00 | 0.0099 B | 0.2380 A | 0.1039 A | 12.78 B | 21.28 B | |
| L-Am | XZX45 | 0.99 | 0.0099 d | 0.1430 d | 0.0664 d | 15.59 a | 27.20 a |
| ZJZ29 | 0.99 | 0.0148 b | 0.1138 f | 0.0572 e | 13.65 b | 25.82 b | |
| QLY2012 | 0.99 | 0.0163 a | 0.1327 e | 0.0662 d | 13.26 c | 24.87 c | |
| Mean | 0.99 | 0.0137 A | 0.1298 B | 0.0633 B | 14.17 A | 25.96 A |
| Stages | Type | Varieties | ADPG-PPase (nmol·min−1·g−1 FW) | SBE (U·g−1 FW) | SSS (nmol·min−1·g−1 FW) | GBSS (nmol·min−1·g−1 FW) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAH6 | MH-Am | ZJZ17 | 3254.04 a | 415.82 c | 257.52 b | 97.88 c |
| ZLY171 | 2928.93 b | 536.68 a | 204.65 c | 60.70 d | ||
| Mean | 3091.48 A | 476.25 A | 231.09 B | 79.29 B | ||
| L-Am | ZJZ29 | 2553.81 c | 351.89 d | 283.46 b | 115.56 b | |
| QLY2012 | 2537.98 c | 438.80 b | 360.44 a | 147.45 a | ||
| Mean | 2545.89 B | 395.35 A | 321.95 A | 131.51 A | ||
| DAH12 | MH-Am | ZJZ17 | 3591.10 a | 539.12 a | 120.35 c | 24.06 c |
| ZLY171 | 3388.77 b | 452.02 b | 78.86 d | 55.39 a | ||
| Mean | 3489.93 A | 495.57 A | 99.60 B | 39.72 A | ||
| L-Am | ZJZ29 | 2771.11 c | 326.07 c | 149.02 b | 26.29 c | |
| QLY2012 | 3501.74 ab | 445.78 b | 177.96 a | 39.76 b | ||
| Mean | 3136.43 B | 385.92 B | 163.49 A | 33.02 A | ||
| DAH18 | MH-Am | ZJZ17 | 3266.52 a | 331.52 a | 127.31 c | 27.81 b |
| ZLY171 | 3586.93 a | 268.48 b | 107.17 d | 42.49 a | ||
| Mean | 3426.73 A | 300.00 A | 117.24 B | 35.15 A | ||
| L-Am | ZJZ29 | 3314.78 a | 252.41 b | 172.59 b | 29.22 b | |
| QLY2012 | 3209.75 a | 260.90 b | 194.15 a | 42.24 a | ||
| Mean | 3262.27 A | 256.66 B | 183.37 A | 35.73 A | ||
| DAH24 | MH-Am | ZJZ17 | 2749.18 b | 168.87 b | 83.74 b | 15.36 d |
| ZLY171 | 3159.76 a | 194.23 a | 96.77 ab | 42.71 b | ||
| Mean | 2954.47 A | 181.55 A | 90.25 B | 29.04 A | ||
| L-Am | ZJZ29 | 2458.90 c | 146.76 c | 115.77 a | 33.52 c | |
| QLY2012 | 3119.28 a | 119.90 d | 108.88 a | 48.98 a | ||
| Mean | 2789.09 A | 133.33 B | 112.32 A | 41.25 A |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Wu, J.; Wu, J.; Que, R.; Qi, W.; Guo, L.; Huang, G.; Tan, X.; Zeng, Y.; Xie, X. Early-Season Rice Varieties with Low Amylose Content Can Achieve Low Chalkiness and Comparable Yield to High-Amylose Ones in the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River. Agriculture 2026, 16, 1255. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16121255
Wu J, Wu J, Que R, Qi W, Guo L, Huang G, Tan X, Zeng Y, Xie X. Early-Season Rice Varieties with Low Amylose Content Can Achieve Low Chalkiness and Comparable Yield to High-Amylose Ones in the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River. Agriculture. 2026; 16(12):1255. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16121255
Chicago/Turabian StyleWu, Jiale, Jingjing Wu, Renwei Que, Wenle Qi, Lin Guo, Guanjun Huang, Xueming Tan, Yongjun Zeng, and Xiaobing Xie. 2026. "Early-Season Rice Varieties with Low Amylose Content Can Achieve Low Chalkiness and Comparable Yield to High-Amylose Ones in the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River" Agriculture 16, no. 12: 1255. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16121255
APA StyleWu, J., Wu, J., Que, R., Qi, W., Guo, L., Huang, G., Tan, X., Zeng, Y., & Xie, X. (2026). Early-Season Rice Varieties with Low Amylose Content Can Achieve Low Chalkiness and Comparable Yield to High-Amylose Ones in the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River. Agriculture, 16(12), 1255. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16121255

