Ionic Composition and Deposition Loads of Rainwater According to Regional Characteristics of Agricultural Areas
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Areas and Sampling Sites
2.2. Rainwater Sampling and Analytical Methods
- C: Ion concentration in the rainwater sample (ug/L)
- V: Sampled rainwater volume (L)
- A: Sampling surface area of the collection device (m2)
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Spatial Characteristics of Rainwater Chemistry Across Agricultural Sites
3.2. Temporal Variations in Cation and Anion Deposition in Agricultural Areas
3.3. Correlation Analysis of Major Ions in Rainwater from Agricultural Areas
3.4. Spatial Distribution of Rainwater Ions According to Agricultural Regional Characteristics
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Chu, B.; Zhang, X.; Liu, Y.; He, H.; Sun, Y.; Jiang, J.; Li, J.; Hao, J. Synergetic Formation of Secondary Inorganic and Organic Aerosol: Effect of SO2 and NH3 on Particle Formation and Growth. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2016, 16, 14219–14230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Volkamer, R.; Jimenez, J.L.; San Martini, F.; Dzepina, K.; Zhang, Q.; Salcedo, D.; Molina, L.T.; Worsnop, D.R.; Molina, M.J. Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation from Anthropogenic Air Pollution: Rapid and Higher than Expected. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2006, 33, L17811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jenkin, M.E.; Clemitshaw, K.C. Ozone and Other Secondary Photochemical Pollutants: Chemical Processes Governing Their Formation in the Planetary Boundary Layer. Atmos. Environ. 2000, 34, 2499–2527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tiwari, S.; Hopke, P.K.; Thimmaiah, D.; Dumka, U.C.; Srivastava, A.K.; Bisht, D.S.; Rao, P.S.P.; Chate, D.M.; Srivastava, M.K.; Tripathi, S.N. Nature and Sources of Ionic Species in Precipitation across the Indo-Gangetic Plains, India. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 2016, 16, 943–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lesack, L.F.W.; Melack, J.M. The Deposition, Composition, and Potential Sources of Major Ionic Solutes in Rain of the Central Amazon Basin. Water Resour. Res. 1991, 27, 2953–2977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhargava, S.; Bhargava, S. Ecological Consequences of the Acid Rain. IOSR J. Appl. Chem. 2013, 5, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ling, D.J.; Zhang, J.E.; Ouyang, Y. Advancements in Research on Impact of Acid Rain on Soil Ecosystem: A Review. Soils 2007, 39, 514–521. [Google Scholar]
- Singh, A.; Agrawal, M. Acid Rain and Its Ecological Consequences. J. Environ. Biol. 2007, 29, 15. [Google Scholar]
- Haines, B.; Waide, J. Predicting Potential Impacts of Acid Rain on Elemental Cycling in a Southern Appalachian Deciduous Forest at Coweeta. In Effects of Acid Precipitation on Terrestrial Ecosystems; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1980; pp. 335–340. [Google Scholar][Green Version]
- Dzhamalov, R.G.; Zlobina, V.L. The Role of Precipitation in Groundwater Pollution. In Advances in Groundwater Pollution Control and Remediation; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1996; pp. 493–507. [Google Scholar]
- Park, J.; Lee, D.; Kim, H.; Woo, N.C. Effects of Water-Table Changes Following Rainfall Events on Arsenic Fate and Transport in Groundwater–Surface Water Mixing Zones. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 933, 173200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Camargo, J.A.; Alonso, Á. Ecological and Toxicological Effects of Inorganic Nitrogen Pollution in Aquatic Ecosystems: A Global Assessment. Environ. Int. 2006, 32, 831–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Smith, V.H. Eutrophication of Freshwater and Coastal Marine Ecosystems a Global Problem. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2003, 10, 126–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Y.; Yuan, Q.; Zhao, C.; Wang, L.; Li, Y.; Ma, X.; Guo, J.; Yang, H. Identification of Nitrate Sources in Rivers in a Complex Catchment Using a Dual Isotopic Approach. Water 2021, 13, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Li, X.; Li, Y.; Shi, Y.; Xiao, H.; Wang, L.; Yin, W.; Zhu, Z.; Bian, H.; Li, H. Transport Pathways of Nitrate in Stormwater Runoff Inferred from High-Frequency Sampling and Stable Water Isotopes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2024, 58, 17026–17035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, L.; Liu, X. Nitrogen Transformations Associated with N2O Emissions in Agricultural Soils. In Nitrogen in Agriculture—Updates; InTech Rijeka: Rijeka, Croatia, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Ma, R.; Zou, J.; Han, Z.; Yu, K.; Wu, S.; Li, Z.; Liu, S.; Niu, S.; Horwath, W.R.; Zhu-Barker, X. Global Soil-derived Ammonia Emissions from Agricultural Nitrogen Fertilizer Application: A Refinement Based on Regional and Crop-specific Emission Factors. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2021, 27, 855–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Beaudor, M.; Vuichard, N.; Lathière, J.; Evangeliou, N.; Van Damme, M.; Clarisse, L.; Hauglustaine, D. Global Agricultural Ammonia Emissions Simulated with the ORCHIDEE Land Surface Model. Geosci. Model. Dev. 2023, 16, 1053–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, R.K.; Prajapati, S.; Nigam, I.M.; Zhao, R.; Gupta, T. Particulates and Gaseous Emission from Indian Agricultural Sector and Health Burden Attributable to Agricultural PM2.5. ChemRxiv 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.; Liu, L.; Liu, P.; Ding, J.; Xu, H.; Liu, S. Improved Global Agricultural Crop-and Animal-Specific Ammonia Emissions during 1961–2018. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2023, 344, 108289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; von Wirén, N. Ammonium as a Signal for Physiological and Morphological Responses in Plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 2581–2592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uddin, M.; Perrine-Walker, F.; Kaiser, B. The Role of Ammonium Transport Proteins in Improving Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Crop Production. In Improving Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Crop Production; Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2024; pp. 33–66. ISBN 9781801464703. [Google Scholar]
- Wdowiak, A.; Kryzheuskaya, K.; Podgórska, A.; Paterczyk, B.; Zebrowski, J.; Archacki, R.; Szal, B. Ammonium Nutrition Modifies Cellular Calcium Distribution Influencing Ammonium-Induced Growth Inhibition. J. Plant Physiol. 2024, 298, 154264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, C.; Fang, Y.; Wang, S.; He, K. The Alleviation of Ammonium Toxicity in Plants. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2023, 65, 1362–1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Podgorska, A.; Ostaszewska, M.; Gardeström, P.; Rasmusson, A.G.; Szal, B. In Comparison with Nitrate Nutrition, Ammonium Nutrition Increases Growth of the Frostbite1 A Rabidopsis Mutant. Plant Cell Environ. 2015, 38, 224–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ye, J.Y.; Tian, W.H.; Jin, C.W. Nitrogen in Plants: From Nutrition to the Modulation of Abiotic Stress Adaptation. Stress. Biol. 2022, 2, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Qin, C.; Yi, K.; Wu, P. Ammonium Affects Cell Viability to Inhibit Root Growth in Arabidopsis. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 2011, 12, 477–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coleto, I.; Marín-Peña, A.J.; Urbano-Gámez, J.A.; González-Hernández, A.I.; Shi, W.; Li, G.; Marino, D. Interaction of Ammonium Nutrition with Essential Mineral Cations. J. Exp. Bot. 2023, 74, 6131–6144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Riaz, M.; Ahmad, M.N.; Mukhtar, M.; Nawaz, N. Nitrate Contamination of Soil and Water: Implications for Ecosystem Functions and Human Health. In Inorganic Contaminants and Radionuclides; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2024; pp. 351–373. [Google Scholar]
- Toetz, D. Nitrate in Ground and Surface Waters in the Vicinity of a Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation. Arch. Hydrobiol. 2006, 166, 67–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bharti, C.; Mohapatra, A.; Maurya, R.; Maharana, C.; Maurya, A.; Malakar, P. Nitrate Pollution with Modernization of Indian Agriculture. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 2020, 9, 2073–2080. [Google Scholar]
- Hornbeck, J.H. Biological Remediation of Nitrate () Pollution at the Land/Water Interface. Stud. Online J. 2000, 5, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
- Künstler, A.; Gullner, G.; Ádám, A.L.; Kolozsváriné Nagy, J.; Király, L. The Versatile Roles of Sulfur-Containing Biomolecules in Plant Defense—A Road to Disease Resistance. Plants 2020, 9, 1705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anderson, J.W.; Fitzgerald, M.A. Sulphur Distribution and Redistribution in Vegetative and Generative Plants. In Sulphur in Plants; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2003; pp. 113–134. [Google Scholar]
- Hell, R.; Rennenberg, H. The Plant Sulphur Cycle. In Sulphur in Agroecosystems; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1998; pp. 135–173. [Google Scholar]
- Singh, S.S. Increase in Neutral Salt Extractable Cation Exchange Capacity of Some Acid Soils as Affected by CaSO4 Applications. Can. J. Soil Sci. 1984, 64, 153–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mitchell, M.J.; Lindberg, S.E. Sulfur Chemistry, Deposition, and Cycling in Forests. In Atmospheric Deposition and Forest Nutrient Cycling: A Synthesis of the Integrated Forest Study; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1992; pp. 72–149. [Google Scholar]
- Fasth, W.J.; David, M.B.; Vance, G.F. Sulfate Retention and Cation Leaching of Forest Soils in Response to Acid Additions. Can. J. For. Res. 1991, 21, 32–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ulaş, F.; Ameen, H.; Ulaş, A. Salt Stress and Its Implications in Vegetable Crops with Special Reference to the Cucurbitaceae Family. Ann. Arid. Zone 2024, 63, 117–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lindberg, S.; Premkumar, A. Ion Changes and Signaling under Salt Stress in Wheat and Other Important Crops. Plants 2023, 13, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bernstein, N. Plants and Salt: Plant Response and Adaptations to Salinity. In Model Ecosystems in Extreme Environments; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 101–112. [Google Scholar]
- Roy, S.; Chowdhury, N. Salt Stress in Plants and Amelioration Strategies: A Critical Review; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2020; ISBN 1838810625. [Google Scholar]
- Yan, S.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, T.; Cheng, Y.; Wang, C.; Luo, M.; Feng, H.; Siddique, K.H.M. The Higher Relative Concentration of K+ to Na+ in Saline Water Improves Soil Hydraulic Conductivity, Salt-Leaching Efficiency and Structural Stability. Soil 2023, 9, 339–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mäser, P.; Gierth, M.; Schroeder, J.I. Molecular Mechanisms of Potassium and Sodium Uptake in Plants. Plant Soil 2002, 247, 43–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Black, A.S.; Abdul-Hakim, B.M.S. Soil Structure Effects and Leaching of Sodium Following Sodium Chloride Fertiliser Applications. New Zealand J. Agric. Res. 1984, 27, 399–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wakeel, A. Potassium–Sodium Interactions in Soil and Plant under Saline-sodic Conditions. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2013, 176, 344–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cakmak, I. Magnesium in Crop Production, Food Quality and Human Health. Plant Soil 2013, 368, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jing, T.; Li, J.; He, Y.; Shankar, A.; Saxena, A.; Tiwari, A.; Maturi, K.C.; Solanki, M.K.; Singh, V.; Eissa, M.A. Role of Calcium Nutrition in Plant Physiology: Advances in Research and Insights into Acidic Soil Conditions-A Comprehensive Review. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2024, 210, 108602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rufyikiri, G.; Dufey, J.E.; Achard, R.; Delvaux, B. Cation Exchange Capacity and Aluminum–Calcium–Magnesium Binding in Roots of Bananas Cultivated in Soils and in Nutrient Solutions. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2002, 33, 991–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Richter, D.D.; Johnson, D.W.; Dai, K.H. Cation Exchange and A1 Mobilization in Soils. In Atmospheric Deposition and Forest Nutrient Cycling: A Synthesis of the Integrated Forest Study; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1992; pp. 341–377. [Google Scholar]
- Oosterhuis, D.M.; Loka, D.A.; Kawakami, E.M.; Pettigrew, W.T. The Physiology of Potassium in Crop Production. Adv. Agron. 2014, 126, 203–233. [Google Scholar]
- Anil Kumar, S.; Kaniganti, S.; Hima Kumari, P.; Sudhakar Reddy, P.; Suravajhala, P.P.S.; Kishor, P.B.K. Functional and Biotechnological Cues of Potassium Homeostasis for Stress Tolerance and Plant Development. Biotechnol. Genet. Eng. Rev. 2024, 40, 3527–3570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ragel, P.; Raddatz, N.; Leidi, E.O.; Quintero, F.J.; Pardo, J.M. Regulation of K+ Nutrition in Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sayed, S.; Hellal, F.A.; El–Rab, N.G.; Zewainy, R.M. Ameliorative Effects of Potassium on the Salinity Stress in Plants: A Review. Asian J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2019, 23, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Squizzato, S.; Masiol, M.; Visin, F.; Canal, A.; Rampazzo, G.; Pavoni, B. The PM2.5 Chemical Composition in an Industrial Zone Included in a Large Urban Settlement: Main Sources and Local Background. Environ. Sci. Process Impacts 2014, 16, 1913–1922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ren, H.; Wu, X.; Zhao, W.; Cheng, J. Potential Risks of PM2.5 in Urban and Suburban Environments: A Dual Perspective on Chemical Constituents and Pollution Sources. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 2024, 24, 230315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lewis, A.C. The Changing Face of Urban Air Pollution. Science 2018, 359, 744–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vega, E.; López-Veneroni, D.; Ramírez, O.; Chow, J.C.; Watson, J.G. Particle-Bound PAHs and Chemical Composition, Sources and Health Risk of PM2. 5 in a Highly Industrialized Area. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 2021, 21, 210047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Skyllakou, K.; Rivera, P.G.; Dinkelacker, B.; Karnezi, E.; Kioutsioukis, I.; Hernandez, C.; Adams, P.J.; Pandis, S.N. Changes in PM 2.5 Concentrations and Their Sources in the US from 1990 to 2010. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2021, 21, 17115–17132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galloway, J.N.; Cowling, E.B.; Gorham, E.; McFee, W.W. National Program for Assessing the Problem of Atmospheric Deposition (Acid Rain). A Report to the Council on Environmental Quality; U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information: Oak Ridge, TN, USA, 1978.
- Bai, W.; Zhao, X.; Yin, B.; Guo, L.; Zhang, W.; Wang, X.; Yang, W. Characteristics of PM2.5 in an Industrial City of Northern China: Mass Concentrations, Chemical Composition, Source Apportionment, and Health Risk Assessment. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, D.; Eom, H.-J.; Cho, H.-R.; Ro, C.-U. Hygroscopic behavior of NaCl–MgCl2 mixture particles as nascent sea-spray aerosol surrogates and observation of efflorescence during humidification. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2015, 15, 11273–11290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oddie, B.C.V. The composition of precipitation at Lerwick, Shetland. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 1959, 85, 163–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wada, S.; Kokubu, N. Chemical composition of maritime aerosols. Geochem. J. 1973, 6, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soltani, S.; Azadi, H.; Mahmoudi, H.; Witlox, F. Organic Agriculture in Iran: Farmers’ Barriers to and Factors Influencing Adoption. Renew. Agric. Food Syst. 2014, 29, 126–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahalinganathan, K.; Thamban, M. Potential Genesis and Implications of Calcium Nitrate in Antarctic Snow. Cryosphere 2016, 10, 825–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Novak, A.; Šumrada, T.; Juvančič, L. Are Farmers’ Minds Really Too Elusive to Capture? A Novel Evaluation Frame-work for the Knowledge Transfer Initiatives in Agriculture. Int. J. Agric. Sustain. 2024, 22, 2379877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, D.; Yao, T.; Wu, G.; Zhu, M.; De, J.; Qu, D.; Shi, Y. Identifying the Natural and Agricultural Impacts from Glacio-chemistry in the Aru Ice Core on the Northwestern Tibetan Plateau. SSRN 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]









| Site | Agricultural Type | Cultivated Crop | Typical Farming Schedule in Korea | Standard Fertilization Rate (N–P2O5–K2O, kg/10 a) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hongcheon | Upland | Maize (corn) | Sowing: April–May; Harvest: August–September | 15–3–6 |
| Danyang | Upland | Garlic | Planting: September–October; Harvest: May–June | 24.8–7.8–20.0 |
| Sangju | Upland | Soybean | Sowing: May–June; Harvest: October–November | 3.0–3.0–3.4 |
| Muan | Upland | Onion | Nursery: August–September; Transplanting: October–November; Harvest: April–June | 24–7.7–15.4 |
| Gimhae | Paddy | Rice | Sowing: April–May; Transplanting: May–June; Harvest: September–October | 9.0–4.5–8.7 |
| Yuju | Paddy | Rice | Sowing: April–May; Transplanting: May–June; Harvest: September–October | 9.0–4.5–8.7 |
| Nonsan | Paddy | Rice | Sowing: April-May; Transplanting: May–June; Harvest: September–October | 9.0–4.5–8.7 |
| Naju | Paddy | Rice | Sowing: April–May; Transplanting: May–June; Harvest: September–October | 9.0–4.5–8.7 |
| Sampling Sites | Sampling Events (n) | Collected Rainfall Volume (mL) | pH | EC (µS/cm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hongcheon | 15 | 12,939 (920–34,000) | 5.85 (5.15–7.33) | 9.89 (4.14–34.10) |
| Danyang | 21 | 13,967 (480–32,100) | 6.29 (5.40–6.76) | 13.47 (3.91–60.40) |
| Sangju | 22 | 11,762 (295–32,650) | 6.19 (5.15–7.01) | 15.78 (4.48–110.70) |
| Gimhae | 47 | 6163 (270–18,520) | 5.19 (3.84–6.60) | 16.28 (3.27–78.50) |
| Yuju | 14 | 12,563 (620–72,100) | 6.31 (5.59–7.09) | 23.78 (6.24–109.00) |
| Nonsan | 38 | 7974 (36–28,160) | 6.16 (4.53–6.92) | 15.35 (2.74–65.40) |
| Naju | 26 | 9263 (250–29,630) | 5.95 (4.32–8.29) | 16.95 (4.02–83.60) |
| Muan | 25 | 8473 (270–20,750) | 6.16 (5.12–8.17) | 20.40 (4.05–111.80) |
| Ions | Site | Na+ (ppm) | (ppm) | K+ (ppm) | Ca2+ (ppm) | Mg2+ (ppm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cations | Hongcheon | 0.27 (0.05–1.19) | 0.67 (0.13–1.91) | 0.11 (0.02–0.43) | 0.35 (0.06–2.50) | 0.07 (0.01–0.48) |
| Danyang | 0.28 (0.07–1.25) | 0.86 (0.14–2.99) | 0.11 (0.02–0.47) | 0.54 (0.07–3.56) | 0.09 (0.00–0.41) | |
| Sangju | 0.28 (0.05–1.44) | 1.15 (0.20–7.62) | 0.14 (0.00–0.48) | 0.36 (0.03–1.89) | 0.10 (0.00–0.50) | |
| Gimhae | 0.60 (0.08–3.05) | 0.57 (0.06–4.02) | 0.11 (0.01–0.35) | 0.28 (0.03–1.27) | 0.11 (0.00–0.57) | |
| Yuju | 0.45 (0.10–2.50) | 1.74 (0.38–4.90) | 0.18 (0.02–0.47) | 0.91 (0.10–7.25) | 0.12 (0.01–0.65) | |
| Nonsan | 0.32 (0.05–1.25) | 1.12 (0.14–4.96) | 0.21 (0.01–3.38) | 0.38 (0.03–1.84) | 0.09 (0.00–0.43) | |
| Naju | 0.61 (0.06–6.04) | 1.03 (0.19–7.31) | 0.13 (0.01–0.47) | 0.22 (0.02–1.04) | 0.12 (0.01–0.80) | |
| Muan | 0.79 (0.12–4.45) | 1.31 (0.18–7.32) | 0.34 (0.05–2.61) | 0.42 (0.08–2.18) | 0.19 (0.02–1.63) | |
| Site | Cl− (ppm) | (ppm) | (ppm) | (ppm) | ||
| Anions | Hongcheon | 0.46 (0.14–2.06) | 0.07 (0.06–0.11) | 1.06 (0.35–2.30) | 0.76 (0.21–2.20) | |
| Danyang | 0.38 (0.15–1.73) | 0.08 (0.06–0.16) | 1.43 (0.35–6.64) | 0.96 (0.21–4.37) | ||
| Sangju | 0.44 (0.14–2.01) | 0.09 (0.02–0.26) | 1.55 (0.03–11.43) | 1.01 (0.02–6.02) | ||
| Gimhae | 0.95 (0.21–5.47) | 0.09 (0.01–0.83) | 1.46 (0.11–12.00) | 1.18 (0.10–6.96) | ||
| Yuju | 0.65 (0.21–3.35) | 0.12 (0.07–0.42) | 2.50 (0.65–13.97) | 1.66 (0.48–9.01) | ||
| Nonsan | 0.59 (0.14–3.11) | 0.09 (0.02–0.36) | 1.84 (0.04–9.60) | 1.02 (0.02–5.68) | ||
| Naju | 1.12 (0.18–12.40) | 0.08 (0.04–0.15) | 1.66 (0.37–12.40) | 1.38 (0.03–12.01) | ||
| Muan | 2.45 (0.22–28.09) | 0.09 (0.04–0.16) | 2.01 (0.35–12.40) | 1.77 (0.29–12.02) |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Oh, B.W.; Kim, J.H.; Na, Y.E.; Seo, I.H. Ionic Composition and Deposition Loads of Rainwater According to Regional Characteristics of Agricultural Areas. Agriculture 2026, 16, 126. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16010126
Oh BW, Kim JH, Na YE, Seo IH. Ionic Composition and Deposition Loads of Rainwater According to Regional Characteristics of Agricultural Areas. Agriculture. 2026; 16(1):126. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16010126
Chicago/Turabian StyleOh, Byung Wook, Jin Ho Kim, Young Eun Na, and Il Hwan Seo. 2026. "Ionic Composition and Deposition Loads of Rainwater According to Regional Characteristics of Agricultural Areas" Agriculture 16, no. 1: 126. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16010126
APA StyleOh, B. W., Kim, J. H., Na, Y. E., & Seo, I. H. (2026). Ionic Composition and Deposition Loads of Rainwater According to Regional Characteristics of Agricultural Areas. Agriculture, 16(1), 126. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16010126

