Next Article in Journal
Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treated with First- Versus Second-Generation Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors
Next Article in Special Issue
An Evolution of Shoulder Periprosthetic Infections Management: MicroDTTect, Bioactive Glass and Tantalum Cones Employment
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of COVID-19 Quarantine on Advanced Hemorrhoidal Disease and the Role of Telemedicine in Patient Management
Previous Article in Special Issue
Onlay Uncemented Lateralized Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Fracture Sequelae Type 1 with Valgus/Varus Malunion: Deltoid Lengthening and Outcomes
Article

Revision Arthroscopic Bankart Repair: A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu 42601, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(11), 3418; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9113418
Received: 20 September 2020 / Revised: 22 October 2020 / Accepted: 22 October 2020 / Published: 25 October 2020
Although the frequency of arthroscopic revision surgery is increasing in patients with recurrent dislocation after a primary shoulder stabilization, the literature describing arthroscopic revision Bankart repair has been limited. Preferred reporting items for systematic meta-analyses guidelines were followed by utilizing PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases. Keywords included shoulder dislocation, anterior shoulder instability, revision surgery, stabilization, and arthroscopic Bankart repair. Quality assessments were performed with criteria from the methodological index for nonrandomized studies (MINORS). A total of 14 articles were included in this analysis. The mean MINORS score was 12.43. A total of 339 shoulders (337 patients) were included (281 males and 56 females). The mean follow-up period was 36.7 months. Primary surgeries were as follows: arthroscopic procedures (n = 172, 50.7%), open procedure (n = 87, 25.7%), and unknown (n = 80, 23.6%). The mean rate of recurrent instability after revision arthroscopic Bankart repair was 15.3% (n = 52), and an additional re-revision procedure was needed in 6.5% of cases (n = 22). Overall, there were 18.0% (n = 61) of complications reported. This systematic review suggests that arthroscopic revision Bankart repair can lead to an improvement in functional outcomes and reasonable patient satisfaction with proper patient selection. View Full-Text
Keywords: shoulder; Bankart; dislocation; instability; revision; arthroscopy; systematic review shoulder; Bankart; dislocation; instability; revision; arthroscopy; systematic review
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Yon, C.-J.; Cho, C.-H.; Kim, D.-H. Revision Arthroscopic Bankart Repair: A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 3418. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9113418

AMA Style

Yon C-J, Cho C-H, Kim D-H. Revision Arthroscopic Bankart Repair: A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020; 9(11):3418. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9113418

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yon, Chang-Jin, Chul-Hyun Cho, and Du-Han Kim. 2020. "Revision Arthroscopic Bankart Repair: A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes" Journal of Clinical Medicine 9, no. 11: 3418. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9113418

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop