Next Article in Journal
The Prognostic Implication of Late Gadolinium Enhancement Quantification and Syncope in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Next Article in Special Issue
Impact of Sarcopenia and Functional Relationships Between Balance and Gait After Total Hip Arthroplasty
Previous Article in Journal
Posterior Hypopharyngeal/Upper Esophageal Wall Reconstruction Using a Double-Island Free Fasciocutaneous Anterolateral Thigh Flap: A Case Report and Scoping Review of the Literature
Previous Article in Special Issue
Physiotherapy in Text Neck Syndrome: A Scoping Review of Current Evidence and Future Directions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Frozen Shoulder as a Metabolic and Immune Disorder: Potential Roles of Leptin Resistance, JAK-STAT Dysregulation, and Fibrosis

by
Santiago Navarro-Ledesma
Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Campus of Melilla, University of Granada, Querol Street 5, 52004 Melilla, Spain
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(5), 1780; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14051780
Submission received: 21 January 2025 / Revised: 2 March 2025 / Accepted: 6 March 2025 / Published: 6 March 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Updates in Physiotherapy for Musculoskeletal Disorders)

Abstract

:
Frozen shoulder (FS) is a complex and multifactorial condition characterized by persistent inflammation, fibrosis, and metabolic dysregulation. Despite extensive research, the underlying drivers of FS remain poorly understood. Recent findings indicate the coexistence of pro-inflammatory and fibrosis-resolving macrophages within affected tissues, suggesting a dysregulated immune response influenced by metabolic and neuroendocrine factors. This review proposes that leptin resistance, a hallmark of metabolic syndrome and chronic inflammation, may play a central role in FS pathogenesis by impairing macrophage polarization, perpetuating inflammation, and disrupting fibrosis resolution. The JAK-STAT signaling pathway, critically modulated by leptin resistance, may further contribute to immune dysregulation by sustaining inflammatory macrophage activation and interfering with tissue remodeling. Additionally, FS shares pathogenic features with fibrotic diseases driven by TGF-β signaling, mitochondrial dysfunction, and circadian disruption, further linking systemic metabolic dysfunction to localized fibrotic pathology. Beyond immune and metabolic regulation, alterations in gut microbiota, bacterial translocation, and chronic psychosocial stress may further exacerbate systemic inflammation and neuroendocrine imbalances, intensifying JAK-STAT dysregulation and leptin resistance. By examining the intricate interplay between metabolism, immune function, and fibrotic remodeling, this review highlights targeting leptin sensitivity, JAK-STAT modulation, and mitochondrial restoration as novel therapeutic strategies for FS treatment. Future research should explore these interconnections to develop integrative interventions that address both the metabolic and immune dysregulation underlying FS, ultimately improving clinical outcomes.

1. Introduction

Frozen shoulder (FS), also known as adhesive capsulitis, is a musculoskeletal condition characterized by progressive pain and significant limitation in the range of motion of the shoulder joint. Affecting approximately 2% to 5% of the general population, FS is particularly prevalent among individuals between the ages of 40 and 60, with a higher incidence observed in women compared to men [1,2,3]. The condition can be classified into primary or idiopathic and secondary forms, with the latter often associated with trauma, surgery, or systemic diseases such as diabetes mellitus. FS not only impacts patients’ quality of life, but also has considerable socioeconomic implications, including high healthcare costs and significant work-related disability. Studies have shown that up to 50% of individuals with FS experience a reduction in their capacity to perform work-related tasks, leading to decreased productivity and increased absenteeism [4]. The long duration of the disease, which can last from 1 to 3 years or more, further exacerbates these socioeconomic burdens, as patients often require prolonged treatment and rehabilitation [5].
The etiology of FS remains largely unclear, though it is generally accepted to be a multifactorial condition involving both mechanical and biochemical components [6]. Systemic diseases such as diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, and metabolic syndrome have been strongly associated with an increased risk of developing FS [7]. These conditions, characterized by chronic low-grade inflammation and insulin resistance, contribute to altered tissue repair mechanisms, leading to fibrosis and thickening of the joint capsule [4]. In particular, metabolic disturbances, including the dysregulation of adipokines, have been proposed as central to the inflammatory processes driving FS [8,9]. One of the key adipokines involved is leptin, a hormone produced by adipose tissue that plays a significant role in both energy metabolism and immune regulation. Elevated leptin levels and leptin resistance may be linked to the chronic inflammation and fibrosis observed in FS, suggesting a possible metabolic pathway contributing to the disease’s progression, and positioning it as a pivotal player in the emerging field of immunometabolism [10]. Leptin receptors are widely expressed throughout the immune system, and their regulatory effects encompass both innate and adaptive immune cells. Leptin is among the adipokines contributing to the chronic inflammatory state associated with obesity, which predisposes individuals not only to type 2 diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and cardiovascular disease, but also to autoimmune and allergic disorders [11].
In this regard, it has been hypothesized that the GABAergic system may play a crucial role in the development of FS, suggesting a potential link between type 1 diabetes, autoimmune endocrine disorders, and FS through shared pathophysiological mechanisms [9]. According to Nataf et al., antibodies against GAD65, which are implicated in both type 1 diabetes and central nervous system disorders, often arise from two synergistic risk factors: immune challenges and psycho-emotional stress. This combination increases the likelihood of T cell priming against GAD65, potentially leading to both type 1 diabetes and central nervous system disorders [12]. Antibody spreading is a known mechanism in autoimmune diseases, and the propagation of GAD65 antibodies has been observed in individuals with type 1 diabetes, although antibody levels were not consistently high enough to predict autoreactivity in infiltrated tissues [13]. Proteomics could be employed to test this hypothesis regarding why type 1 diabetes (DM1) is more closely associated with FS than type 2 diabetes (DM2). Such research aims to identify immune-related proteins, including T lymphocyte markers and the presence of GAD65 or other superantigens, along with their corresponding antibodies. Nonetheless, disturbances in the GABAergic system could contribute to a fear of physical activity, and movement neglect has been identified as a significant risk factor for the development of FS [8].
A study by Kawahara et al. analyzed the proteomic profiles of FS in different regions of the shoulder capsule across various patient groups. Their analysis compared twelve patients with severe primary FS to seven patients with FS and rotator cuff tears, who served as a control group. Significant proteomic differences were found between the two groups, with several proteins highlighted for their clinical relevance [14]. Notably, proteins involved in the PI3K-Akt and PPAR signaling pathways—key components of insulin and leptin metabolism—were more prominent in patients with primary FS [15,16]. This increased signaling activity suggests the heightened involvement of insulin and leptin pathways in the pathophysiology of primary FS, potentially linked to insulin and leptin resistance [16,17]. Conversely, the proteome of patients with rotator cuff damage was more closely related to direct tissue injury rather than metabolic disturbances. These findings were supported by the detection of proteins indicating Staphylococcus aureus infection, antigen processing and presentation, and lysosome/phagosome activity [14]. The involvement of phagosomal and lysosomal activity suggests the presence of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) and pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) [18,19]. In cases of FS following rotator cuff damage, barrier disruption between the blood and capsule may underlie symptomatology. This distinction implies that patients with primary FS may benefit from treatments targeting lifestyle modifications and metabolic interventions to address insulin and leptin resistance, while those with traumatic FS may require more orthopedic-focused approaches. The study also concluded that primary and secondary FS have distinct etiologies and pathophysiologies, necessitating differentiated therapeutic strategies [9,14].
Additionally, Hand et al. identified immune cell infiltration in the shoulder capsules of 22 patients with refractory primary FS. Mast cells were the most prevalent, followed by T lymphocytes, B lymphocytes, and macrophages, indicating a chronic inflammatory state in primary FS. The interaction between mast cells and fibroblasts suggests that inflammation drives fibrosis through mast cell-mediated mechanisms [20]. The presence of T and B lymphocytes, components of the adaptive immune system, raises the possibility of an autoimmune reaction targeting fibrotic tissue in FS, although alternative hypotheses may exist. Latest studies utilizing single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) to map the cellular landscape of frozen shoulder tissue identified key cell types and their roles in the resolution of inflammatory fibrosis. The main findings suggest that FS differs from other fibrotic conditions because it is a self-limiting disease, with pro-inflammatory and fibrosis-resolving macrophages (MERTK+ macrophages) coexisting in the affected tissues. These macrophages interact with specific fibroblast subtypes (DKK3+ and POSTN+ fibroblasts) to promote matrix remodeling and inflammation resolution. Moreover, the study found similarities in the gene expression profiles of MERTK+ macrophages in FS and those in synovial tissues from rheumatoid arthritis patients in remission, supporting the hypothesis that these macrophages facilitate the resolution of inflammation. The study suggests that the cellular mechanisms for resolving FS fibrosis may be pre-established during human shoulder development. These findings open avenues for new therapeutic strategies aimed at promoting resolution of fibrosis in chronic inflammatory diseases by targeting the interactions between specific macrophage and fibroblast populations [21].
Despite growing evidence linking metabolic dysfunction with FS pathophysiology, the precise mechanisms remain unclear. The interplay between leptin resistance, JAK-STAT signaling, and immune responses has not been thoroughly investigated in FS, leading to a gap in understanding its systemic nature. This review aims to: (1) explore the link between metabolic dysregulation and immune dysfunction in FS, (2) examine the role of JAK-STAT signaling in chronic inflammation and fibrosis, (3) compare JAK-STAT signaling with other fibrotic pathways such as TGF-β, and (4) propose novel therapeutic strategies targeting metabolic–immune interactions in FS.

2. Scoping the Role of JAK-STAT Signaling and MERTK+ Macrophages in Inflammatory Fibrosis Resolution

The aforementioned discovery aligns with the hypothesis that metabolic signals, potentially mediated by leptin, influence the activity of these immune cells. Leptin’s role in energy regulation may extend to regulating the metabolic energy requirements of immune cells, particularly macrophages and fibroblasts, thereby influencing their capacity for fibrosis resolution. Given leptin’s dual role in metabolism and immunity, it is plausible that disruptions in leptin signaling—such as those observed in metabolic syndrome and obesity—contribute to prolonged inflammation and delayed fibrosis resolution in FS [22,23]. The cellular energy demands of MERTK+ macrophages and fibroblasts during matrix remodeling may be influenced by leptin sensitivity and overall metabolic health. Hypothetically, enhancing leptin sensitivity or targeting its downstream signaling pathways could improve the efficiency of these immune cells in resolving fibrosis, providing a potential therapeutic target. Thus, leptin may act as a bridge between metabolic dysfunction and impaired immune responses, perpetuating conditions like FS unless metabolic and immune homeostasis are restored [24]. The role of leptin and metabolic signals becomes even more pronounced when considering the JAK-STAT signaling pathway, as discussed in Sarapultsev et al. [25]. JAK-STAT is a key signaling mechanism in both immune and metabolic regulation, with direct implications for inflammation and cellular stress responses [26]. Dysregulation of this pathway, such as through leptin resistance, can perpetuate chronic inflammation and hinder the resolution of fibrosis, as seen in conditions like FS [10]. This pathway interacts with the immune system at various levels, promoting or dampening inflammatory responses based on metabolic inputs, such as leptin levels and signaling [27].
The presence of leptin resistance in FS patients may impair the proper functioning of the JAK-STAT pathway, leading to prolonged inflammation and delayed resolution of fibrosis [28]. This highlights the need for therapeutic interventions targeting both metabolic dysfunction and immune regulation, such as enhancing leptin sensitivity or directly modulating the JAK-STAT pathway to restore immune and metabolic balance in affected tissues [29]. Future research should focus on the combined role of metabolic regulators, like leptin, and immune-modulating pathways, like JAK-STAT, in promoting tissue repair and fibrosis resolution in frozen shoulder [9]. The JAK-STAT signaling pathway, a critical mediator of immune responses and leptin signaling, may also be implicated in FS pathophysiology. In the context of leptin resistance, dysregulation of the JAK-STAT pathway exacerbates inflammatory responses, activating transcription factors involved in fibrosis and tissue remodeling [30]. This suggests that therapies targeting JAK-STAT signaling could potentially mitigate the chronic inflammation and fibrosis characteristic of FS [31]. In this regard, a key aspect of fibrosis progression is the dysregulation of transcription factors, which are downstream targets of the JAK-STAT pathway [32]. Activation of STAT proteins, such as STAT3, has been implicated in promoting fibroblast proliferation and collagen production, exacerbating fibrotic responses [33]. The continuous stimulation of STAT3 in response to cytokines and growth factors, such as TGF-β, leads to unchecked ECM accumulation, a process that is central to the fibrotic pathology observed in FS [34]. Recent transcriptomic analyses from patients with FS reveal the upregulation of genes involved in immune responses and extracellular matrix modification, such as MMP9 and MMP13, which are closely associated with collagen degradation and fibrosis progression [35]. These findings suggest that metabolic dysregulation, mediated by leptin resistance, may directly influence the cellular processes that perpetuate inflammation and fibrosis in FS.

3. JAK-STAT, TGF-β, and Leptin Signaling in Frozen Shoulder

The TGF-β signaling pathway is well recognized as a central driver of fibrosis across multiple organ systems, including the musculoskeletal system. Elevated TGF-β activity has been implicated in fibroblast proliferation, extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition, and persistent myofibroblast activation, all of which contribute to joint capsule fibrosis and stiffness [36,37]. However, recent evidence suggests that the JAK-STAT pathway may also modulate fibroblast function and ECM production, establishing an important link between immune-mediated inflammation and fibrotic progression [38,39].
Notably, leptin signaling appears to intersect with both JAK-STAT and TGF-β pathways. Leptin promotes TGF-β-induced fibroblast differentiation into myofibroblasts in various fibrotic conditions, including pulmonary and hepatic fibrosis [40,41]. Moreover, studies suggest that STAT3 activation can directly upregulate TGF-β expression, amplifying fibrotic responses [42]. In contrast, leptin resistance may lead to a dysregulated JAK-STAT response, potentially altering its interaction with TGF-β and promoting a sustained fibrotic environment [43].
Both TGF-β and JAK-STAT pathways contribute to fibrosis progression, but through distinct and complementary mechanisms. TGF-β primarily drives fibrosis via SMAD-dependent pathways, promoting fibroblast-to-myofibroblast differentiation, ECM production, and tissue remodeling [36,37]. The JAK-STAT pathway, on the other hand, is primarily involved in immune regulation, but also plays a role in fibroblast activation and ECM remodeling, particularly through STAT3-mediated transcriptional regulation of fibrotic genes [38,39]. The crosstalk between these pathways is evident in various fibrotic conditions, where persistent STAT3 activation has been linked to increased TGF-β expression, reinforcing the fibrotic response [42].
The interplay between leptin resistance, JAK-STAT signaling, and TGF-β in FS remains an area of significant interest. Leptin resistance disrupts homeostatic metabolic signaling, which in turn influences immune and fibrotic pathways, creating a chronic inflammatory state that favors fibrosis progression. The effects of leptin on TGF-β signaling could be direct, through its influence on fibroblast activation, or indirect, by modulating the inflammatory microenvironment that sustains TGF-β activity [40,41]. Given that leptin resistance is closely linked to metabolic dysfunction, obesity, and chronic inflammation, its impact on both JAK-STAT and TGF-β could provide a unifying explanation for the metabolic–immune dysregulation observed in FS [43].
While JAK-STAT and TGF-β function as independent pathways, their interaction in the fibrotic progression of FS remains underexplored. Given the evidence that leptin influences both pathways, further research is warranted to determine whether leptin resistance disrupts this balance and fosters a chronic inflammatory-fibrotic state in FS. Targeting both pathways simultaneously—through JAK-STAT inhibitors, TGF-β modulators, or metabolic interventions aimed at improving leptin sensitivity—could provide a novel therapeutic strategy for FS patients.

4. Chronic Neuroinflammation, Leptin Resistance, and JAK-STAT Signaling

The coexistence of both pro-inflammatory and fibrosis-resolving macrophages (MERTK+) within the fibrotic tissues of frozen shoulder (FS) may be further explained through the lens of neuroinflammation and leptin resistance, particularly regarding the JAK-STAT signaling pathway [21]. Neuroinflammation, a state of chronic inflammation within the central nervous system (CNS), often results from a dysregulated immune response, driven by the JAK-STAT pathway [44]. This pathway is activated by various cytokines that promote both immune and inflammatory responses, playing a crucial role in diseases such as multiple sclerosis and Parkinson’s disease [34].
Leptin resistance at the hypothalamic level, which is often present in individuals with metabolic syndrome, can exacerbate neuroinflammation by disrupting the normal regulation of energy balance and immune responses [45]. Leptin normally acts on hypothalamic receptors to regulate appetite and energy expenditure, but when leptin signaling is impaired, a state of chronic low-grade inflammation ensues [46]. This inflammatory state may spill over into peripheral tissues, such as those involved in FS, creating an environment where pro-inflammatory and fibrosis-resolving macrophages coexist [47]. The JAK-STAT pathway plays a central role in both the central and peripheral inflammatory processes, amplifying the inflammatory signals in response to neuroinflammation [34,48].
In FS, this disrupted signaling could manifest as a failure to effectively transition macrophages from a pro-inflammatory to a pro-resolving phenotype, leading to the persistence of fibrosis [38,49]. The involvement of JAK-STAT signaling in neuroinflammation suggests that targeting this pathway could mitigate not only the peripheral fibrotic response, but also the central neuroinflammatory drivers of FS [26,50]. The pathway’s role in activating transcription factors associated with fibrosis and inflammation further underscores its importance [51,52]. Future research should explore the potential cross-talk between neuroinflammation, JAK-STAT signaling, and leptin resistance in FS, as this might unveil novel therapeutic strategies aimed at resolving both neuroinflammation and peripheral fibrosis [47]. Furthermore, in FS, the role of leptin may be further complicated by the inhibition of its signaling by SOCS3, which binds to the leptin receptor, particularly at sites necessary for STAT3 activation [53]. This attenuation of leptin signaling may exacerbate both peripheral inflammation and fibrosis because it disrupts the balance of macrophage activation [54]. SOCS3, by inhibiting the JAK-STAT signaling pathway, prevents effective immune resolution and promotes sustained inflammation. Moreover, SOCS3’s role extends beyond leptin resistance [55]. It is also implicated in insulin resistance, which contributes to the broader metabolic dysregulation observed in FS patients [7]. In these individuals, overexpression of SOCS3 in both hypothalamic and peripheral tissues reduces the effectiveness of insulin signaling, further fueling systemic inflammation [54]. The link between metabolic disorders and fibrotic diseases, like FS, may thus be mediated, in part, by the SOCS3-induced blockade of both leptin and insulin pathways, perpetuating chronic inflammation and tissue fibrosis.
This insight prompts further investigation into the metabolic regulation of immune cell functions in FS and other chronic fibrotic diseases. It suggests that therapies aimed at improving metabolic health—particularly those enhancing leptin sensitivity—could also facilitate immune resolution processes, opening new avenues for treating FS by targeting both the metabolic and immune aspects of the disease.
The role of chronic psychosocial stress in FS pathophysiology is an emerging area of interest, particularly in its interaction with metabolic and immune dysregulation. Psychological factors such as pain-related fear, anxiety, and depression have been identified as key prognostic markers in FS, influencing functional disability, pain intensity, and recovery duration [56]. Stress-induced activation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis and the resultant low-grade systemic inflammation may create a metabolic and immunological context that predisposes individuals to FS [9]. Chronic exposure to stressors not only contributes to increased circulating levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, but also disrupts the homeostatic regulation of leptin and insulin signaling, further exacerbating immune dysregulation and fibrotic remodeling in FS. In this context, leptin resistance may serve as a metabolic link between chronic psychosocial stress and the inflammatory processes driving FS, as persistent stress is known to impair leptin signaling, fostering behavioral patterns characterized by reduced physical activity and heightened pain perception [8]. These findings suggest that targeting stress-related metabolic dysregulation, alongside immune and fibrotic pathways, could offer a more integrative therapeutic approach to FS management. Future studies should explore the potential of interventions aimed at mitigating stress-induced immune activation and leptin resistance as a novel strategy to improve both clinical outcomes and patient quality of life in FS (See Figure 1).

5. Low-Grade Infections, Altered Microbiota, and Leptin Resistance

Interestingly, systemic leptin levels are known to decrease in states of malnutrition and starvation, which underscores leptin’s role as a mediator between nutritional status and immune function [57]. Leptin deficiency is linked to heightened vulnerability to various infections [58]. Furthermore, certain infections can mimic malnutrition by downregulating leptin levels, contributing to an immune-compromised state [59]. For example, a significant drop in leptin levels during starvation has been associated with increased sensitivity to endotoxins like lipopolysaccharides (LPS) and TNF-α in animal models. However, leptin replacement has been shown to reverse these effects, protecting against fasting-induced immune deficiencies, such as lymphopenia [60,61].
Phagocytosis, a key immune mechanism for eliminating pathogens, is enhanced by leptin, which stimulates macrophage activity and prevents apoptosis in multiple immune cells involved in both innate and adaptive immunity [62]. Numerous studies support the idea that leptin supplementation can reduce infections caused by pathogens such as Listeria monocytogenes, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, and Mycobacterium tuberculosis by boosting macrophage phagocytosis [10,59,63]. Leptin also plays a crucial role in combating sepsis, a severe inflammatory response that can lead to organ failure and death. In leptin-deficient mice, exogenous leptin administration improved survival rates during sepsis by reducing systemic IL-6 levels and controlling inflammation [10,64]. In humans, higher leptin levels have been observed in survivors of sepsis compared to non-survivors, underscoring leptin’s protective role in immune responses during infection [59].
Obesity, on the other hand, is associated with elevated leptin levels, which can promote chronic low-grade inflammation by activating both innate and adaptive immune cells [65]. This pro-inflammatory environment contributes to the breakdown of immune tolerance, priming immune cells for a Th1-dominated response [10,66]. This persistent inflammation heightens the risk of developing metabolic diseases such as cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes, as well as autoimmune conditions like multiple sclerosis, thyroiditis, rheumatoid arthritis, and inflammatory bowel disease [67].
Chronic inflammation, whether due to infection or autoimmune disease, can lead to leptin resistance, particularly in the hypothalamus [68]. This leptin resistance impairs appetite regulation and energy expenditure, further exacerbating obesity [69]. In obesity, the interaction between hypertrophic adipocytes and immune cells, such as macrophages, leads to an overproduction of pro-inflammatory cytokines and adipokines, like leptin [70]. These molecules perpetuate local and systemic inflammation, contributing to leptin resistance at both the peripheral and central levels [71]. Inflammatory cytokines activate signaling pathways, such as NF-κB, which induce suppressors of cytokine signaling (SOCS3) and protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTP1B), further inhibiting leptin receptor signaling via the JAK/STAT pathway [26,72,73].
Emerging research highlights the role of gut microbiota in regulating systemic metabolism, particularly energy balance, glucose homeostasis, and low-grade inflammation associated with obesity [74,75,76]. Alterations in the gut microbiota, such as those caused by a high-fat diet, have been linked to a reduction in beneficial bacterial populations, like Bifidobacterium spp., Lactobacillus spp., and Roseburia spp. [77,78,79]. The interaction between gut microbiota and the immune system is mediated by pattern recognition receptors like Toll-like receptors (TLRs), which detect microbial components such as LPS. Fatty acids can stimulate innate immunity by interacting with the TLR4/CD14 complex, further promoting inflammatory responses [80]. Alterations in the gut microbiota have been implicated in the development of obesity and its related metabolic disorders, with evidence suggesting that modulating the gut microbiota can influence leptin sensitivity and metabolic outcomes [81,82,83].
Interestingly, the gut microbiota also appears to regulate leptin action, with studies showing that dietary interventions, like prebiotics, can improve leptin sensitivity in obese and diabetic mice [84]. This suggests that gut microbiota modulation may offer a novel therapeutic strategy for restoring leptin sensitivity and addressing metabolic dysregulation in FS.
Additionally, recent findings suggest a possible infectious etiology in frozen shoulder (FS), linked to bacteria that commonly inhabit human skin, such as Propionibacterium acnes (P. acnes) [85,86,87]. Although some studies argue against this hypothesis, others have found evidence of infection in FS patients. For instance, markers such as HMGB1, IL-33, S100A8, and S100A9 were elevated in the joint capsules of FS patients, supporting the notion of a low-grade infection contributing to the pathology [88]. P. acnes, often dismissed as a contaminant due to its slow growth in anaerobic conditions, has been implicated in post-surgical infections and other conditions, like disk herniation [89,90,91]. The systemic spread of these bacteria, along with species like Streptococcus epidermis and Corynebacterium propinquum, could contribute to persistent low-grade infections that play a role in the chronic inflammation observed in FS [92].
Bacterial infiltration can occur through daily activities, such as tooth brushing, leading to microbial dissemination via the bloodstream [93]. These bacteria may enter tissues with low oxygen levels, such as the intervertebral disks and possibly the shoulder joint, particularly in areas with reduced movement [8,94]. Such low-grade infections may be an under-recognized factor in the development of FS and other inflammatory conditions [95].

6. Discussion

This review highlights the complex interplay between leptin resistance, JAK-STAT signaling, metabolic dysregulation, and immune dysfunction in the pathophysiology of frozen shoulder (FS). We summarize evidence suggesting that FS shares common inflammatory and fibrotic pathways with metabolic disorders, particularly in conditions characterized by chronic low-grade inflammation, insulin resistance, and dysregulated adipokine signaling. Leptin, traditionally recognized for its role in energy homeostasis, emerges as a key immunometabolic regulator, influencing fibroblast activation, macrophage polarization, and immune cell recruitment within the joint capsule. Moreover, we discuss how JAK-STAT dysregulation, particularly through leptin resistance and SOCS3 overexpression, may perpetuate chronic inflammation and fibrosis in FS, similar to its role in other fibrotic conditions. Recent findings demonstrate the coexistence of both pro-inflammatory and fibrosis-resolving macrophages (MERTK+) in FS tissue, suggesting that metabolic and immune cross-talk influences the progression and resolution of fibrosis, a concept that aligns with recent transcriptomic and proteomic studies. Additionally, the review explores the potential role of chronic psychosocial stress as a driver of immune–metabolic dysregulation and discusses emerging evidence linking gut microbiota alterations and bacterial translocation to systemic inflammation and immune priming in FS. These insights broaden the traditional understanding of FS as a purely orthopedic condition, instead positioning it as a multisystem disorder influenced by metabolic, inflammatory, and immune dysfunctions.
A recent study reveals the coexistence of both pro-inflammatory macrophages and fibrosis-resolving MERTK+ macrophages within the same affected tissue in FS, raising important questions regarding the underlying metabolic and signaling mechanisms that allow such cellular dynamics [21]. In traditional models of inflammation, pro-inflammatory macrophages (often referred to as M1) dominate the early stages of the immune response, followed by a transition to pro-resolving macrophages (M2) as the inflammation subsides [96]. However, the coexistence of these two distinct macrophage phenotypes in the fibrotic tissue of FS suggests a more complex regulatory environment, which is potentially driven by metabolic and immunological factors [97].
One possible explanation for this paradox may lie in the metabolic state of the tissue, particularly in relation to leptin resistance [98]. Leptin, a key regulator of both metabolism and immune responses, plays a crucial role in macrophage polarization [99]. In the context of leptin resistance, which is commonly observed in metabolic syndromes such as obesity and type 2 diabetes, macrophages may exhibit a dysregulated response [98]. This dysregulation could impair the typical transition from pro-inflammatory to pro-resolving states, allowing both phenotypes to coexist within the same tissue [100]. Specifically, leptin resistance may impair the energetic capacity of macrophages, altering their metabolic flexibility, which is required for the shift toward a fibrosis-resolving phenotype [101]. The inability to efficiently switch from glycolysis (which favors M1 polarization) to oxidative phosphorylation (which supports M2 activity) could result in the persistence of both pro-inflammatory and pro-resolving macrophages in the fibrotic environment of FS [102].
Moreover, the JAK-STAT signaling pathway, which is critically involved in both immune regulation and leptin signaling, may further contribute to this phenomenon [103]. Dysregulation of the JAK-STAT pathway due to leptin resistance can exacerbate chronic inflammation by promoting the persistence of inflammatory macrophages while simultaneously activating downstream signals that encourage tissue remodeling and fibrosis resolution [27]. In the presence of leptin resistance, the failure to adequately suppress the pro-inflammatory arm of the JAK-STAT pathway may lead to an environment where fibrosis-resolving processes are initiated but not fully effective, thereby allowing these seemingly opposing macrophage populations to coexist [51].
Thus, the coexistence of pro-inflammatory and fibrosis-resolving macrophages in FS tissue may be indicative of a metabolic and signaling imbalance, where leptin resistance and JAK-STAT pathway dysregulation prevent the efficient resolution of inflammation while simultaneously promoting fibrosis. This dynamic highlights the need for further research into how metabolic interventions, particularly those targeting leptin sensitivity and JAK-STAT modulation, could restore proper immune balance and improve fibrosis outcomes in FS.

7. Current Treatments and Future Directions

The treatment of FS remains a challenging and complex endeavor due to the multifactorial nature of the disease, involving both metabolic and inflammatory components. Current therapeutic approaches range from non-surgical interventions, such as physical therapy, corticosteroid injections, and manual mobilization, to more invasive procedures, like arthroscopic capsular release and hydrodilation [3]. However, these methods primarily focus on symptom relief and improving shoulder mobility, with limited effectiveness in addressing the underlying inflammatory and fibrotic processes [104].

Conventional Therapies and Their Limitations

Non-surgical approaches, such as corticosteroid injections, have demonstrated effectiveness in reducing pain and improving joint function during the early “freezing” phase of FS. Nonetheless, the long-term impact of corticosteroids remains limited, as they do not target the underlying causes of fibrosis and inflammation [3,104]. Similarly, physical therapy and manual mobilization are beneficial for improving the range of motion, particularly in the later stages of FS, but they also fall short in addressing the root metabolic and inflammatory factors driving disease progression [8,105].
Among non-surgical treatments, corticosteroid injections are widely used to reduce pain and improve joint function during the early “freezing” phase of FS [106]. Despite their short-term efficacy, long-term corticosteroid use does not modify the disease course and is associated with significant risks, including joint deterioration, cartilage degeneration, and systemic metabolic side effects, such as hyperglycemia and insulin resistance, particularly in patients with pre-existing metabolic disorders [107]. Similarly, physical therapy and manual mobilization remain the mainstay of conservative treatment, with benefits in the range of motion improvement, particularly in the later stages of FS [108,109]. However, overly aggressive mobilization may worsen pain and inflammation, potentially prolonging recovery [110].
For patients with persistent symptoms, surgical interventions such as arthroscopic capsular release and hydrodilation are considered. While capsular release is effective in improving mobility, it carries risks such as postoperative stiffness, adhesion reformation, and persistent pain [111]. Hydrodilation, which involves the injection of large fluid volumes into the joint capsule to increase capsular distension, has shown variable success rates and does not target the fibrotic and metabolic dysfunction underlying FS [112].

8. Emerging Therapeutic Approaches

Recent insights into metabolic dysregulation, particularly leptin resistance, suggest that FS should not only be viewed as a mechanical disorder, but also as a metabolic–immunological condition. Given the role of leptin in immune regulation and fibrosis, novel therapeutic strategies targeting leptin sensitivity, JAK-STAT signaling, and microbiome modulation have gained attention [8].

8.1. Targeting Leptin Resistance and Metabolic Dysregulation

Given the potential role leptin may play in FS pathophysiology, therapeutic interventions aimed at improving leptin sensitivity could prove beneficial. Studies have shown that exercise, particularly resistance and aerobic training, can improve leptin sensitivity and reduce systemic inflammation [8,105]. In addition, dietary modifications, such as time-restricted feeding or intermittent fasting, have been found to modulate leptin levels, offering a potential avenue for metabolic correction in FS patients [105]. However, while restoring leptin sensitivity could theoretically ameliorate fibrosis and inflammation, potential risks remain. Excessive leptin modulation could impact systemic metabolism, potentially influencing appetite regulation, insulin sensitivity, and immune function [113]. Further research is required to determine the optimal balance between therapeutic benefits and metabolic stability in FS treatment.

8.2. JAK-STAT Pathway as a Target

Persistent activation of this pathway contributes to the overproduction of pro-inflammatory cytokines, macrophage polarization, and fibroblast activation, leading to excessive extracellular matrix deposition and fibrosis [34,48]. Thus, the JAK-STAT signaling pathway, activated by inflammatory cytokines and impaired leptin signaling, may play a crucial role in both immune regulation and fibrotic progression in FS. Therapies aimed at modulating the JAK-STAT pathway could reduce inflammation and promote tissue repair, making it a promising target for FS treatment [8,105]. However, JAK-STAT inhibitors, which are already in clinical use for autoimmune and inflammatory conditions like rheumatoid arthritis, have shown promise in reducing fibrosis by modulating macrophage activity and fibroblast proliferation [114]. Moreover, their immunosuppressive effects pose significant risks, including increased susceptibility to infections, impaired immune surveillance, and potential long-term metabolic alterations [115]. Future research should aim to determine whether selective JAK-STAT modulation can provide anti-fibrotic benefits while minimizing immune suppression, potentially making it a viable therapeutic option for FS.

8.3. Gut Microbiota Modulation

Recent studies have highlighted the role of the gut microbiota in regulating systemic inflammation and metabolic health, including leptin sensitivity [116]. Alterations in gut microbiota composition, often observed in obesity and metabolic syndrome, can exacerbate leptin resistance and inflammatory processes via bacterial translocation and LPS-mediated activation of the JAK-STAT pathway [117]. Probiotic and prebiotic interventions may offer a novel therapeutic strategy to improve metabolic and immune regulation in FS patients, potentially reducing the chronic inflammation and fibrosis associated with the condition [8,118]. However, the precise role of microbiota-driven inflammation in FS remains to be fully elucidated, warranting further clinical investigation.

9. Future Research Directions

Given the complex interplay of metabolic, inflammatory, and fibrotic processes in FS, future research must explore novel pathways that may provide insight into the underlying mechanisms of this condition. One promising area of investigation involves the relationship between mental health, mitochondrial dysfunction, circadian rhythm disruption, leptin resistance, and the JAK-STAT signaling pathway, which together could play a pivotal role in FS progression.

9.1. Lifestyle Interventions as a Potential Therapeutic Approach in FS

In light of the growing evidence linking chronic psychosocial stress, metabolic dysregulation, and immune dysfunction in FS, lifestyle interventions emerge as a promising avenue for disease management [24]. Modern lifestyle factors, including sedentary behavior, poor dietary habits, and chronic exposure to psychosocial stressors, have been implicated in the disruption of homeostatic regulatory systems, including the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis and the autonomic nervous system [24]. These disruptions, in turn, contribute to chronic low-grade inflammation, gut barrier dysfunction, and neuroimmune activation, which have been proposed as key drivers of immune-mediated musculoskeletal conditions such as FS [119]. From a psychoneuroimmunological perspective, interventions that promote physical activity, circadian alignment, and metabolic flexibility could mitigate the sustained immune activation and metabolic disturbances associated with shoulder pain [120]. Regular exercise has been shown to improve leptin and insulin sensitivity, while also exerting anti-inflammatory effects through modulation of the gut microbiome and systemic cytokine profiles [121]. Additionally, circadian rhythm regulation through light exposure, sleep hygiene, and structured feeding patterns has been proposed as an essential component in restoring immune–metabolic balance, particularly in individuals experiencing stress-related immune dysfunction [122]. Given the interplay between environmental stressors, immune dysregulation, and FS progression, future research should focus on integrative lifestyle-based interventions that address both the physiological and psychosocial dimensions of the disease. These approaches may hold significant potential in improving patient outcomes while reducing reliance on pharmacological therapies that primarily target symptom relief rather than the underlying pathophysiology of FS.

9.2. Mitochondrial Dysfunction and FS Progression

Mitochondrial health is critical for maintaining cellular energy homeostasis and regulating immune responses. Mitochondrial dysfunction, often a result of chronic inflammation and metabolic stress, is associated with decreased ATP production, increased oxidative stress, and impaired tissue repair [123]. In the context of FS, mitochondrial dysfunction may exacerbate the chronic inflammation and fibrosis observed in the joint capsule [8]. As immune cells, such as macrophages, rely on mitochondrial energy production to facilitate their transition from pro-inflammatory (M1) to fibrosis-resolving (M2 or MERTK+), mitochondrial dysfunction could delay this transition, prolonging inflammation and fibrosis [21]. Understanding how mitochondrial impairment influences macrophage function and fibroblast activity in FS could provide valuable insight into the disease’s metabolic underpinnings and suggest potential therapeutic targets aimed at restoring mitochondrial function to improve tissue repair.

9.3. Disruption of Circadian Rhythms

Circadian rhythms regulate a wide array of physiological processes, including immune function and energy metabolism. Disruption of these rhythms, whether due to sleep disorders, shift work, or other environmental factors, has been linked to metabolic diseases and chronic inflammation [124]. In shoulder disorders, the dysregulation of circadian rhythms could further impair the already-compromised metabolic pathways, such as leptin signaling, thereby perpetuating the disease state [120]. Leptin levels are known to follow a circadian pattern, and disruptions in these rhythms may worsen leptin resistance, impairing the body’s ability to regulate energy balance and immune responses effectively [125,126]. Investigating how circadian rhythm disturbances contribute to metabolic dysregulation and inflammation in FS could open new avenues for chronotherapy-based interventions that realign circadian patterns to improve metabolic outcomes and reduce inflammation [127,128].

9.4. Leptin Resistance and JAK-STAT Pathway

Leptin resistance may play a central role in the chronic inflammation and metabolic disturbances observed in FS [24,129]. The JAK-STAT pathway, activated by inflammatory cytokines and impaired leptin signaling, is a critical mediator of immune responses and fibrosis [38]. In FS, persistent activation of the JAK-STAT pathway due to leptin resistance may promote the sustained activation of pro-inflammatory macrophages and fibroblasts, leading to excessive extracellular matrix deposition and tissue fibrosis [38]. Future research should focus on the precise mechanisms by which leptin resistance amplifies JAK-STAT signaling and how this contributes to the maintenance of a chronic inflammatory state in FS [129]. Targeting the JAK-STAT pathway in conjunction with restoring leptin sensitivity may provide a dual approach to reducing inflammation and fibrosis in FS patients.

10. Conclusions

This review highlights the potential critical role of metabolic–immune dysregulation, particularly leptin resistance and JAK-STAT signaling, in the pathophysiology of FS. The persistence of both pro-inflammatory and fibrosis-resolving (MERTK+) macrophages within FS tissue suggests a disrupted immune resolution process, potentially driven by metabolic impairments. Leptin resistance, a hallmark of metabolic disorders, not only contributes to sustained inflammation, but also disrupts macrophage polarization, delaying fibrosis resolution. This metabolic dysfunction is further amplified by chronic neuroinflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and circadian rhythm disruption, which collectively impair the transition from acute to resolving phases of inflammation.
The JAK-STAT pathway, as a central mediator of immune and metabolic responses, likely plays a pivotal role in maintaining this dysfunctional environment.
Given the complexity of FS pathogenesis, effective therapeutic strategies should move beyond symptom management and target the root causes of metabolic and immune dysregulation. Restoring leptin sensitivity, modulating JAK-STAT signaling, improving mitochondrial function, and aligning circadian rhythms emerge as promising avenues for intervention. Additionally, integrative approaches, including exercise, dietary modifications, gut microbiota-targeted therapies, and psychological stress management, may enhance immune resilience and metabolic homeostasis.
Future research should prioritize investigating the mechanistic links between metabolic dysfunction, immune dysregulation, and fibrosis progression in FS. A deeper understanding of how chronic stress, neuroendocrine alterations, and systemic inflammation intersect in FS pathophysiology may open new therapeutic opportunities, not only for FS, but also for other chronic inflammatory and fibrotic conditions. Addressing these interconnected mechanisms through precision medicine and personalized metabolic–immune interventions could transform FS management, offering long-term solutions that go beyond conventional orthopedic treatments.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

This publication is part of the project Ref. No.: MEL-02-UGR24, funded by the Autonomous City of Melilla as part of its commitment to research.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abrassart, S.; Kolo, F.; Piotton, S.; Chih-Hao Chiu, J.; Stirling, P.; Hoffmeyer, P.; Lädermann, A. ‘Frozen shoulder’ is ill-defined. How can it be described better? EFORT Open Rev. 2020, 5, 273–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Brue, S.; Valentin, A.; Forssblad, M.; Werner, S.; Mikkelsen, C.; Cerulli, G. Idiopathic adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: A review. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2007, 15, 1048–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Date, A.; Rahman, L. Frozen Shoulder: Overview of Clinical Presentation and Review of the Current Evidence Base for Management Strategies. Future Sci. OA 2020, 6, FSO647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Mertens, M.G.; Struyf, F.; Verborgt, O.; Dueñas, L.; Balasch-Bernat, M.; Navarro-Ledesma, S.; Fernandez-Sanchez, M.; Luque-Suarez, A.; Lluch Girbes, E.; Meeus, M. Exploration of the clinical course and longitudinal correlations in frozen shoulder: The role of autonomic function, central pain processing, and psychological variables. A longitudinal multicenter prospective observational study. Musculoskelet. Sci. Pract. 2023, 67, 102857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mertens, M.G.; Meeus, M.; Verborgt, O.; Girbes, E.L.; Horno, S.M.-D.; Aguilar-Rodriguez, M.; Dueñas, L.; Navarro-Ledesma, S.; Fernandez-Sanchez, M.; Luque-Suarez, A.; et al. Exploration of the clinical course of frozen shoulder: A longitudinal multicenter prospective study of functional impairments. Braz. J. Phys. Ther. 2023, 27, 100539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Lyne, S.A.; Goldblatt, F.M.; Shanahan, E.M. Living with a frozen shoulder—A phenomenological inquiry. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2022, 23, 318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Struyf, F.; Mertens, M.; Navarro-Ledesma, S. Causes of Shoulder Dysfunction in Diabetic Patients: A Review of Literature. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 6228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. De la Serna, D.; Navarro-Ledesma, S.; Alayón, F.; López, E.; Pruimboom, L. A Comprehensive View of Frozen Shoulder: A Mystery Syndrome. Front. Med. 2021, 8, 663703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Navarro-Ledesma, S.; Hamed-Hamed, D.; Pruimboom, L. A new perspective of frozen shoulder pathology; the interplay between the brain and the immune system. Front. Physiol. 2024, 15, 1248612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pérez-Pérez, A.; Sánchez-Jiménez, F.; Vilariño-García, T.; Sánchez-Margalet, V. Role of Leptin in Inflammation and Vice Versa. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pérez-Pérez, A.; Vilariño-García, T.; Fernández-Riejos, P.; Martín-González, J.; Segura-Egea, J.J.; Sánchez-Margalet, V. Role of leptin as a link between metabolism and the immune system. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2017, 35, 71–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Nataf, S. Evolution, immunity and the emergence of brain superautoantigens. F1000Research 2017, 6, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sohnlein, P.; Muller, M.; Syren, K.; Hartmann, U.; Bohm, B.O.; Meinck, H.M.; Knip, M.; Akerblom, H.K.; Richter, W. Epitope spreading and a varying but not disease-specific GAD65 antibody response in Type I diabetes. Diabetologia 2000, 43, 210–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kawahara, K.; Hohjoh, H.; Inazumi, T.; Tsuchiya, S.; Sugimoto, Y. Prostaglandin E2-induced inflammation: Relevance of prostaglandin E receptors. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 2015, 1851, 414–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Leonardini, A.; Laviola, L.; Perrini, S.; Natalicchio, A.; Giorgino, F. Cross-Talk between PPAR γ and Insulin Signaling and Modulation of Insulin Sensitivity. PPAR Res. 2009, 2009, 818945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Thon, M.; Hosoi, T.; Ozawa, K. Possible Integrative Actions of Leptin and Insulin Signaling in the Hypothalamus Targeting Energy Homeostasis. Front. Endocrinol. 2016, 7, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Huang, X.; Liu, G.; Guo, J.; Su, Z. The PI3K/AKT pathway in obesity and type 2 diabetes. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2018, 14, 1483–1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Roh, J.S.; Sohn, D.H. Damage-Associated Molecular Patterns in Inflammatory Diseases. Immune Netw. 2018, 18, e27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Khorshidian, N.; Khanniri, E.; Koushki, M.R.; Sohrabvandi, S.; Yousefi, M. An Overview of Antimicrobial Activity of Lysozyme and Its Functionality in Cheese. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 833618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hand, G.C.R.; Athanasou, N.A.; Matthews, T.; Carr, A.J. The pathology of frozen shoulder. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Br. 2007, 89-B, 928–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ng, M.T.H.; Borst, R.; Gacaferi, H.; Davidson, S.; Ackerman, J.E.; Johnson, P.A.; Machado, C.C.; Reekie, I.; Attar, M.; Windell, D.; et al. A single cell atlas of frozen shoulder capsule identifies features associated with inflammatory fibrosis resolution. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Yao, J.; Wu, D.; Qiu, Y. Adipose tissue macrophage in obesity-associated metabolic diseases. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 977485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pellegrinelli, V.; Rodriguez-Cuenca, S.; Rouault, C.; Figueroa-Juarez, E.; Schilbert, H.; Virtue, S.; Moreno-Navarrete, J.M.; Bidault, G.; Vázquez-Borrego, M.C.; Dias, A.R.; et al. Dysregulation of macrophage PEPD in obesity determines adipose tissue fibro-inflammation and insulin resistance. Nat. Metab. 2022, 4, 476–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pruimboom, L.; Rocio, F.A.; Navarro-Ledesma, S. Psychoneuroimmunology in the Daily Clinic is Only Possible Within a Contextual Frame. In PsychoNeuroImmunology: Volume 1: Integration of Psychology, Neurology, and Immunology; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2024; pp. 515–563. [Google Scholar]
  25. Sarapultsev, A.; Gusev, E.; Komelkova, M.; Utepova, I.; Luo, S.; Hu, D. JAK-STAT signaling in inflammation and stress-related diseases: Implications for therapeutic interventions. Mol. Biomed. 2023, 4, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hu, X.; Li, J.; Fu, M.; Zhao, X.; Wang, W. The JAK/STAT signaling pathway: From bench to clinic. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2021, 6, 402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Gurzov, E.N.; Stanley, W.J.; Pappas, E.G.; Thomas, H.E.; Gough, D.J. The JAK/STAT pathway in obesity and diabetes. FEBS J. 2016, 283, 3002–3015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yang, R.; Barouch, L.A. Leptin Signaling and Obesity. Circ. Res. 2007, 101, 545–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Paz-Filho, G.; Mastronardi, C.; Wong, M.-L.; Licinio, J. Leptin therapy, insulin sensitivity, and glucose homeostasis. Indian J. Endocrinol. Metab. 2012, 16, 549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Cui, J.; Zhang, T.; Xiong, J.; Lu, W.; Duan, L.; Zhu, W.; Wang, D. RNA-sequence analysis of samples from patients with idiopathic adhesive capsulitis. Mol. Med. Rep. 2017, 16, 7665–7672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Burja, B.; Mertelj, T.; Frank-Bertoncelj, M. Hi-JAKi-ng Synovial Fibroblasts in Inflammatory Arthritis With JAK Inhibitors. Front. Med. 2020, 7, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hu, Q.; Bian, Q.; Rong, D.; Wang, L.; Song, J.; Huang, H.-S.; Zeng, J.; Mei, J.; Wang, P.-Y. JAK/STAT pathway: Extracellular signals, diseases, immunity, and therapeutic regimens. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2023, 11, 1110765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Papaioannou, I.; Xu, S.; Denton, C.P.; Abraham, D.J.; Ponticos, M. STAT3 controls COL1A2 enhancer activation cooperatively with JunB, regulates type I collagen synthesis posttranscriptionally, and is essential for lung myofibroblast differentiation. Mol. Biol. Cell 2018, 29, 84–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Yan, Z.; Gibson, S.A.; Buckley, J.A.; Qin, H.; Benveniste, E.N. Role of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway in regulation of innate immunity in neuroinflammatory diseases. Clin. Immunol. 2018, 189, 4–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kamal, N.; McGee, S.L.; Eng, K.; Brown, G.; Beattie, S.; Collier, F.; Gill, S.; Page, R.S. Transcriptomic analysis of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. J. Orthop. Res. 2020, 38, 2280–2289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chen, P.-Y.; Qin, L.; Simons, M. TGFβ signaling pathways in human health and disease. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2023, 10, 1113061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Giarratana, A.O.; Prendergast, C.M.; Salvatore, M.M.; Capaccione, K.M. TGF-β signaling: Critical nexus of fibrogenesis and cancer. J. Transl. Med. 2024, 22, 594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Liu, J.; Wang, F.; Luo, F. The Role of JAK/STAT Pathway in Fibrotic Diseases: Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms. Biomolecules 2023, 13, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Chakraborty, D.; Šumová, B.; Mallano, T.; Chen, C.-W.; Distler, A.; Bergmann, C.; Ludolph, I.; Horch, R.E.; Gelse, K.; Ramming, A.; et al. Activation of STAT3 integrates common profibrotic pathways to promote fibroblast activation and tissue fibrosis. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Casado, M.E.; Collado-Pérez, R.; Frago, L.M.; Barrios, V. Recent Advances in the Knowledge of the Mechanisms of Leptin Physiology and Actions in Neurological and Metabolic Pathologies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Jain, M.; Budinger, G.R.S.; Lo, A.; Urich, D.; Rivera, S.E.; Ghosh, A.K.; Gonzalez, A.; Chiarella, S.E.; Marks, K.; Donnelly, H.K.; et al. Leptin promotes fibroproliferative acute respiratory distress syndrome by inhibiting peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2011, 183, 1490–1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Dees, C.; Pötter, S.; Zhang, Y.; Bergmann, C.; Zhou, X.; Luber, M.; Wohlfahrt, T.; Karouzakis, E.; Ramming, A.; Gelse, K.; et al. TGF-β-induced epigenetic deregulation of SOCS3 facilitates STAT3 signaling to promote fibrosis. J. Clin. Investig. 2020, 130, 2347–2363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Choi, S.S.; Syn, W.-K.; Karaca, G.F.; Omenetti, A.; Moylan, C.A.; Witek, R.P.; Agboola, K.M.; Jung, Y.; Michelotti, G.A.; Diehl, A.M. Leptin promotes the myofibroblastic phenotype in hepatic stellate cells by activating the hedgehog pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 36551–36560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Jain, M.; Singh, M.K.; Shyam, H.; Mishra, A.; Kumar, S.; Kumar, A.; Kushwaha, J. Role of JAK/STAT in the Neuroinflammation and its Association with Neurological Disorders. Ann. Neurosci. 2021, 28, 191–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Dragano, N.R.V.; Haddad-Tovolli, R.; Velloso, L.A. Leptin, Neuroinflammation and Obesity. Front. Horm. Res. 2017, 48, 84–96. [Google Scholar]
  46. Jais, A.; Brüning, J.C. Hypothalamic inflammation in obesity and metabolic disease. J. Clin. Investig. 2017, 127, 24–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Martin, S.S.; Qasim, A.; Reilly, M.P. Leptin Resistance: A possible interface of inflammation and metabolism in obesity-related cardiovascular disease. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2008, 52, 1201–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Philips, R.L.; Wang, Y.; Cheon, H.; Kanno, Y.; Gadina, M.; Sartorelli, V.; Horvath, C.M.; Darnell, J.E.; Stark, G.R.; O’Shea, J.J. The JAK-STAT pathway at 30: Much learned, much more to do. Cell 2022, 185, 3857–3876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yang, H.; Cheng, H.; Dai, R.; Shang, L.; Zhang, X.; Wen, H. Macrophage polarization in tissue fibrosis. PeerJ 2023, 11, e16092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Xue, C.; Yao, Q.; Gu, X.; Shi, Q.; Yuan, X.; Chu, Q.; Bao, Z.; Lu, J.; Li, L. Evolving cognition of the JAK-STAT signaling pathway: Autoimmune disorders and cancer. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2023, 8, 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Xia, T.; Zhang, M.; Lei, W.; Yang, R.; Fu, S.; Fan, Z.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, T. Advances in the role of STAT3 in macrophage polarization. Front. Immunol. 2023, 14, 1160719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Li, D.; Li, D.; Wang, Z.; Li, J.; Shahzad, K.A.; Wang, Y.; Tan, F. Signaling pathways activated and regulated by stem cell-derived exosome therapy. Cell Biosci. 2024, 14, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bjørbæk, C.; Lavery, H.J.; Bates, S.H.; Olson, R.K.; Davis, S.M.; Flier, J.S.; Myers, M.G. SOCS3 Mediates Feedback Inhibition of the Leptin Receptor via Tyr985. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 40649–40657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Wunderlich, C.M.; Hövelmeyer, N.; Wunderlich, F.T. Mechanisms of chronic JAK-STAT3-SOCS3 signaling in obesity. JAK-STAT 2013, 2, e23878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Jorgensen, S.B.; O’Neill, H.M.; Sylow, L.; Honeyman, J.; Hewitt, K.A.; Palanivel, R.; Fullerton, M.D.; Öberg, L.; Balendran, A.; Galic, S.; et al. Deletion of Skeletal Muscle SOCS3 Prevents Insulin Resistance in Obesity. Diabetes 2013, 62, 56–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Brindisino, F.; Minnucci, S.; Sergi, G.; Lorusso, M.; Struyf, F.; Innocenti, T. Does the psychological profile of a patient with frozen shoulder predict future outcome? A systematic review. Physiother. Res. Int. 2024, 29, e2056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Perry, R.J.; Shulman, G.I. The Role of Leptin in Maintaining Plasma Glucose During Starvation. Postdoc J. 2018, 6, 3–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Maurya, R.; Bhattacharya, P.; Dey, R.; Nakhasi, H.L. Leptin Functions in Infectious Diseases. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 2741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Alti, D.; Sambamurthy, C.; Kalangi, S.K. Emergence of Leptin in Infection and Immunity: Scope and Challenges in Vaccines Formulation. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2018, 8, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Faggioni, R.; Moser, A.; Feingold, K.R.; Grunfeld, C. Reduced Leptin Levels in Starvation Increase Susceptibility to Endotoxic Shock. Am. J. Pathol. 2000, 156, 1781–1787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Oishi, K.; Hashimoto, C. Short-term time-restricted feeding during the resting phase is sufficient to induce leptin resistance that contributes to development of obesity and metabolic disorders in mice. Chronobiol. Int. 2018, 35, 1576–1594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Sánchez-Muñoz, F.; García-Macedo, R.; Alarcón-Aguilar, F.; Cruz, M. Adipocitokines, adipose tissue and its relationship with immune system cells. Gac. Med. Mex. 2005, 141, 505–512. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  63. Hirayama, D.; Iida, T.; Nakase, H. The Phagocytic Function of Macrophage-Enforcing Innate Immunity and Tissue Homeostasis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 19, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Birlutiu, V.; Boicean, L.C. Serum leptin level as a diagnostic and prognostic marker in infectious diseases and sepsis. Medicine 2021, 100, e25720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Kiernan, K.; MacIver, N.J. The Role of the Adipokine Leptin in Immune Cell Function in Health and Disease. Front. Immunol. 2021, 11, 622468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Francisco, V.; Pino, J.; Campos-Cabaleiro, V.; Ruiz-Fernández, C.; Mera, A.; Gonzalez-Gay, M.A.; Gómez, R.; Gualillo, O. Obesity, Fat Mass and Immune System: Role for Leptin. Front. Physiol. 2018, 9, 640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Franco, J.-S.; Amaya-Amaya, J.; Anaya, J.-M. Thyroid disease and autoimmune diseases. In Autoimmunity: From Bench to Bedside; Anaya, J.-M., Shoenfeld, Y., Rojas-Villarraga, A., Levy, R.A., Cervera, R., Eds.; El Rosario University Press: Bogotá, Colombia, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  68. Timper, K.; Brüning, J.C. Hypothalamic circuits regulating appetite and energy homeostasis: Pathways to obesity. Dis. Model. Mech. 2017, 10, 679–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Liu, Z.; Xiao, T.; Liu, H. Leptin signaling and its central role in energy homeostasis. Front. Neurosci. 2023, 17, 1238528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Czaja-Stolc, S.; Potrykus, M.; Stankiewicz, M.; Kaska, Ł.; Małgorzewicz, S. Pro-Inflammatory Profile of Adipokines in Obesity Contributes to Pathogenesis, Nutritional Disorders, and Cardiovascular Risk in Chronic Kidney Disease. Nutrients 2022, 14, 1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Kirichenko, T.V.; Markina, Y.V.; Bogatyreva, A.I.; Tolstik, T.V.; Varaeva, Y.R.; Starodubova, A. V The Role of Adipokines in Inflammatory Mechanisms of Obesity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 14982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Kwon, O.; Kim, K.W.; Kim, M.-S. Leptin signalling pathways in hypothalamic neurons. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2016, 73, 1457–1477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Morris, R.; Kershaw, N.J.; Babon, J.J. The molecular details of cytokine signaling via the JAK/STAT pathway. Protein Sci. 2018, 27, 1984–2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Islam, M.R.; Arthur, S.; Haynes, J.; Butts, M.R.; Nepal, N.; Sundaram, U. The Role of Gut Microbiota and Metabolites in Obesity-Associated Chronic Gastrointestinal Disorders. Nutrients 2022, 14, 624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Vetrani, C.; Di Nisio, A.; Paschou, S.A.; Barrea, L.; Muscogiuri, G.; Graziadio, C.; Savastano, S.; Colao, A. From Gut Microbiota through Low-Grade Inflammation to Obesity: Key Players and Potential Targets. Nutrients 2022, 14, 2103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Scheithauer, T.P.M.; Rampanelli, E.; Nieuwdorp, M.; Vallance, B.A.; Verchere, C.B.; van Raalte, D.H.; Herrema, H. Gut Microbiota as a Trigger for Metabolic Inflammation in Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 571731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Beam, A.; Clinger, E.; Hao, L. Effect of Diet and Dietary Components on the Composition of the Gut Microbiota. Nutrients 2021, 13, 2795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Singh, R.K.; Chang, H.-W.; Yan, D.; Lee, K.M.; Ucmak, D.; Wong, K.; Abrouk, M.; Farahnik, B.; Nakamura, M.; Zhu, T.H.; et al. Influence of diet on the gut microbiome and implications for human health. J. Transl. Med. 2017, 15, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Rinninella, E.; Tohumcu, E.; Raoul, P.; Fiorani, M.; Cintoni, M.; Mele, M.C.; Cammarota, G.; Gasbarrini, A.; Ianiro, G. The role of diet in shaping human gut microbiota. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2023, 62–63, 101828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Li, D.; Wu, M. Pattern recognition receptors in health and diseases. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2021, 6, 291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Valentini, M.; Piermattei, A.; Di Sante, G.; Migliara, G.; Delogu, G.; Ria, F. Immunomodulation by Gut Microbiota: Role of Toll-Like Receptor Expressed by T Cells. J. Immunol. Res. 2014, 2014, 586939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Frosali, S.; Pagliari, D.; Gambassi, G.; Landolfi, R.; Pandolfi, F.; Cianci, R. How the Intricate Interaction among Toll-Like Receptors, Microbiota, and Intestinal Immunity Can Influence Gastrointestinal Pathology. J. Immunol. Res. 2015, 2015, 489821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Fitzgerald, K.A.; Kagan, J.C. Toll-like Receptors and the Control of Immunity. Cell 2020, 180, 1044–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Everard, A.; Lazarevic, V.; Derrien, M.; Girard, M.; Muccioli, G.G.; Neyrinck, A.M.; Possemiers, S.; Van Holle, A.; François, P.; de Vos, W.M.; et al. Responses of Gut Microbiota and Glucose and Lipid Metabolism to Prebiotics in Genetic Obese and Diet-Induced Leptin-Resistant Mice. Diabetes 2011, 60, 2775–2786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Piggott, D.A.; Higgins, Y.M.; Melia, M.T.; Ellis, B.; Carroll, K.C.; McFarland, E.G.; Auwaerter, P.G. Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes of Propionibacterium acnes Prosthetic Shoulder Infections in Adults. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2015, 3, ofv191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Bunker, T.D.; Boyd, M.; Gallacher, S.; Auckland, C.R.; Kitson, J.; Smith, C.D. Association between Propionibacterium acnes and frozen shoulder: A pilot study. Shoulder Elb. 2014, 6, 257–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Booker, S.J.; Boyd, M.; Gallacher, S.; Evans, J.P.; Auckland, C.; Kitson, J.; Thomas, W.; Smith, C.D. The colonisation of the glenohumeral joint by Propionibacterium acnes is not associated with frozen shoulder but is more likely to occur after an injection into the joint. Bone Jt. J. 2017, 99-B, 1067–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Cher, J.Z.B.; Akbar, M.; Kitson, S.; Crowe, L.A.N.; Garcia-Melchor, E.; Hannah, S.C.; McLean, M.; Fazzi, U.G.; Kerr, S.C.; Murrell, G.A.C.; et al. Alarmins in Frozen Shoulder: A Molecular Association Between Inflammation and Pain. Am. J. Sports Med. 2018, 46, 671–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Portillo, M.E.; Corvec, S.; Borens, O.; Trampuz, A. Propionibacterium acnes: An Underestimated Pathogen in Implant-Associated Infections. BioMed Res. Int. 2013, 2013, 804391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Corvec, S.; Portillo, M.E.; Pasticci, B.M.; Borens, O.; Trampuz, A. Epidemiology and New Developments in the Diagnosis of Prosthetic Joint Infection. Int. J. Artif. Organs 2012, 35, 923–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Capoor, M.N.; Ruzicka, F.; Schmitz, J.E.; James, G.A.; Machackova, T.; Jancalek, R.; Smrcka, M.; Lipina, R.; Ahmed, F.S.; Alamin, T.F.; et al. Propionibacterium acnes biofilm is present in intervertebral discs of patients undergoing microdiscectomy. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0174518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Lavergne, V.; Malo, M.; Gaudelli, C.; Laprade, M.; Leduc, S.; Laflamme, P.; Rouleau, D.M. Clinical impact of positive Propionibacterium acnes cultures in orthopedic surgery. Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2017, 103, 307–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Lockhart, P.B.; Brennan, M.T.; Sasser, H.C.; Fox, P.C.; Paster, B.J.; Bahrani-Mougeot, F.K. Bacteremia Associated with Toothbrushing and Dental Extraction. Circulation 2008, 117, 3118–3125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Tang, G.; Wang, Z.; Chen, J.; Zhang, Z.; Qian, H.; Chen, Y. Latent infection of low-virulence anaerobic bacteria in degenerated lumbar intervertebral discs. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2018, 19, 445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Potgieter, M.; Bester, J.; Kell, D.B.; Pretorius, E. The dormant blood microbiome in chronic, inflammatory diseases. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2015, 39, 567–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Pérez, S.; Rius-Pérez, S. Macrophage Polarization and Reprogramming in Acute Inflammation: A Redox Perspective. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Lis-López, L.; Bauset, C.; Seco-Cervera, M.; Cosín-Roger, J. Is the Macrophage Phenotype Determinant for Fibrosis Development? Biomedicines 2021, 9, 1747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Monteiro, L.d.B.; Prodonoff, J.S.; de Aguiar, C.F.; Correa-Da-Silva, F.; Castoldi, A.; Bakker, N.v.T.; Davanzo, G.G.; Castelucci, B.; Pereira, J.A.d.S.; Curtis, J.; et al. Leptin Signaling Suppression in Macrophages Improves Immunometabolic Outcomes in Obesity. Diabetes 2022, 71, 1546–1561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Monteiro, L.; Pereira, J.A.d.S.; Palhinha, L.; Moraes-Vieira, P.M.M. Leptin in the regulation of the immunometabolism of adipose tissue-macrophages. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2019, 106, 703–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Lumeng, C.N.; Bodzin, J.L.; Saltiel, A.R. Obesity induces a phenotypic switch in adipose tissue macrophage polarization. J. Clin. Investig. 2007, 117, 175–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Pan, D.; Li, G.; Jiang, C.; Hu, J.; Hu, X. Regulatory mechanisms of macrophage polarization in adipose tissue. Front. Immunol. 2023, 14, 1149366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Sun, J.-X.; Xu, X.-H.; Jin, L. Effects of Metabolism on Macrophage Polarization Under Different Disease Backgrounds. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 880286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Matarese, G.; Moschos, S.; Mantzoros, C.S. Leptin in Immunology. J. Immunol. 2005, 174, 3137–3142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Challoumas, D.; Biddle, M.; McLean, M.; Millar, N.L. Comparison of Treatments for Frozen Shoulder: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw. Open 2020, 3, e2029581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. de Luxán-Delgado, B.; Potes, Y.; Rubio-González, A.; Solano, J.J.; Boga, J.A.; Antuña, E.; Cachán-Vega, C.; Bermejo-Millo, J.C.; Menéndez-Coto, N.; García-González, C.; et al. Melatonin Alleviates Liver Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Leptin-Deficient Mice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 8677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Wang, W.; Shi, M.; Zhou, C.; Shi, Z.; Cai, X.; Lin, T.; Yan, S. Effectiveness of corticosteroid injections in adhesive capsulitis of shoulder: A meta-analysis. Medicine 2017, 96, e7529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Gaujoux-Viala, C.; Dougados, M.; Gossec, L. Efficacy and safety of steroid injections for shoulder and elbow tendonitis: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2009, 68, 1843–1849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Dueñas, L.; Balasch-Bernat, M.; Aguilar-Rodríguez, M.; Struyf, F.; Meeus, M.; Lluch, E. A Manual Therapy and Home Stretching Program in Patients With Primary Frozen Shoulder Contracture Syndrome: A Case Series. J. Orthop. Sport. Phys. Ther. 2019, 49, 192–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Page, M.J.; Green, S.; Kramer, S.; Johnston, R.V.; McBain, B.; Chau, M.; Buchbinder, R. Manual therapy and exercise for adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder). Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2014, 2014, CD011275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Çelik, D.; Kaya Mutlu, E. Does adding mobilization to stretching improve outcomes for people with frozen shoulder? A randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin. Rehabil. 2016, 30, 786–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Wagner, E.R.; Farley, K.X.; Higgins, I.; Wilson, J.M.; Daly, C.A.; Gottschalk, M.B. The incidence of shoulder arthroplasty: Rise and future projections compared with hip and knee arthroplasty. J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. 2020, 29, 2601–2609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Kraal, T.; The, B.; Boer, R.; van den Borne, M.P.; Koenraadt, K.; Goossens, P.; Eygendaal, D. Manipulation under anesthesia versus physiotherapy treatment in stage two of a frozen shoulder: A study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2017, 18, 412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Zabeau, L.; Lavens, D.; Peelman, F.; Eyckerman, S.; Vandekerckhove, J.; Tavernier, J. The ins and outs of leptin receptor activation. FEBS Lett. 2003, 546, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Banerjee, S.; Biehl, A.; Gadina, M.; Hasni, S.; Schwartz, D.M. JAK-STAT Signaling as a Target for Inflammatory and Autoimmune Diseases: Current and Future Prospects. Drugs 2017, 77, 521–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Curtis, J.R.; Lee, E.B.; Kaplan, I.V.; Kwok, K.; Geier, J.; Benda, B.; Soma, K.; Wang, L.; Riese, R. Tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor: Analysis of malignancies across the rheumatoid arthritis clinical development programme. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2016, 75, 831–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Reyes Diaz, R.A.; Cruz Lara, N.M. Papel de la microbiota intestinal en el desarrollo del síndrome metabólico: Revisión narrativa. Rev. Nutr. Clínica y Metab. 2024, 7, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. García-Ríos, A.; Camargo Garcia, A.; Perez-Jimenez, F.; Perez-Martinez, P. Microbiota intestinal: ¿un nuevo protagonista en el riesgo de enfermedad cardiovascular? Clínica e Investig. en Arterioscler. 2019, 31, 178–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Mallappa, R.; Rokana, N.; Duary, R.; Panwar, H.; Batish, V.; Grover, S. Management of metabolic syndrome through probiotic and prebiotic interventions. Indian J. Endocrinol. Metab. 2012, 16, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Uchida, F.; Oh, S.; Shida, T.; Suzuki, H.; Yamagata, K.; Mizokami, Y.; Bukawa, H.; Tanaka, K.; Shoda, J. Effects of Exercise on the Oral Microbiota and Saliva of Patients with Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 3470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Hamed Hamed, D.; Struyf, F.; Pruimboom, L.; Navarro-Ledesma, S. Efficacy of combined strategies of physical activity, diet and sleep disorders as treatment in patients with chronic shoulder pain. A systematic review. Front. Physiol. 2023, 14, 1221807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Navarro-Ledesma, S.; Hamed-Hamed, D.; González-Muñoz, A.; Pruimboom, L. Physical Activity, Insulin Resistance and Cancer: A Systematic Review. Cancers 2024, 16, 656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Navarro-Ledesma, S.; Hamed-Hamed, D.; Gonzalez-Muñoz, A.; Pruimboom, L. Impact of physical therapy techniques and common interventions on sleep quality in patients with chronic pain: A systematic review. Sleep Med. Rev. 2024, 76, 101937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Casanova, A.; Wevers, A.; Navarro-Ledesma, S.; Pruimboom, L. Mitochondria: It is all about energy. Front. Physiol. 2023, 14, 1114231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Ansarin, A.; Mahdavi, A.M.; Javadivala, Z.; Shanehbandi, D.; Zarredar, H.; Ansarin, K. The cross-talk between leptin and circadian rhythm signaling proteins in physiological processes: A systematic review. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2023, 50, 10427–10443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Maury, E. Off the Clock: From Circadian Disruption to Metabolic Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Park, H.-K.; Ahima, R.S. Physiology of leptin: Energy homeostasis, neuroendocrine function and metabolism. Metabolism 2015, 64, 24–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Civelek, E.; Ozturk Civelek, D.; Akyel, Y.K.; Kaleli Durman, D.; Okyar, A. Circadian Dysfunction in Adipose Tissue: Chronotherapy in Metabolic Diseases. Biology 2023, 12, 1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Dibner, C.; Gachon, F. Circadian Dysfunction and Obesity: Is Leptin the Missing Link? Cell Metab. 2015, 22, 359–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Dessie, G.; Ayelign, B.; Akalu, Y.; Shibabaw, T.; Molla, M.D. Effect of Leptin on Chronic Inflammatory Disorders: Insights to Therapeutic Target to Prevent Further Cardiovascular Complication. Diabetes. Metab. Syndr. Obes. 2021, 14, 3307–3322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Note. Pathophysiological mechanisms and integrative treatment approaches in frozen shoulder. This figure provides a comprehensive overview of the multifactorial pathophysiology of frozen shoulder (FS) and the proposed integrative treatment strategies. On the left side of the figure, key lifestyle and environmental factors, such as circadian rhythm desynchronization and modern lifestyle influences (chronic psychosocial stress, sedentary behavior, poor dietary habits, and pollution), are depicted as major contributors to systemic dysregulation. When sustained over time, these factors promote low-grade inflammation, neuroinflammation, and a state of insulin and leptin resistance, disrupting normal metabolic and immune homeostasis. This condition fosters the weakening of physiological barriers, alterations in gut microbiota composition, and bacterial translocation, further amplifying systemic inflammation and immune dysregulation. In the central portion of the figure, the interconnected pathways of metabolic, immune, and neuroendocrine dysfunctions are highlighted. Chronic psycho-emotional stress and circadian rhythm disruption lead to persistent activation of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) and the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis, which, over time, results in cortisol resistance and SNS sensitization. This prolonged neuroendocrine dysfunction fosters low-grade inflammation and neuroinflammation, further impairing insulin and leptin signaling. Leptin resistance, in particular, contributes to a sustained activation of the JAK-STAT signaling pathway, which is known to promote chronic inflammation and fibrotic processes. The dysregulation of this pathway is likely responsible for the coexistence of pro-inflammatory and fibrosis-resolving macrophages in FS, perpetuating a pathological state where fibrosis is initiated but not efficiently resolved. Furthermore, gut microbiota dysbiosis and bacterial translocation contribute to the systemic immune activation, exacerbating the inflammatory environment and fibrosis progression in FS. On the right side of the figure, a multi-targeted, integrative treatment strategy for FS is proposed, addressing both systemic metabolic–immune imbalances and localized tissue pathology. These interventions include physiotherapy, exercise, dietary habits, oral health, mental health, and sleep quality.
Figure 1. Note. Pathophysiological mechanisms and integrative treatment approaches in frozen shoulder. This figure provides a comprehensive overview of the multifactorial pathophysiology of frozen shoulder (FS) and the proposed integrative treatment strategies. On the left side of the figure, key lifestyle and environmental factors, such as circadian rhythm desynchronization and modern lifestyle influences (chronic psychosocial stress, sedentary behavior, poor dietary habits, and pollution), are depicted as major contributors to systemic dysregulation. When sustained over time, these factors promote low-grade inflammation, neuroinflammation, and a state of insulin and leptin resistance, disrupting normal metabolic and immune homeostasis. This condition fosters the weakening of physiological barriers, alterations in gut microbiota composition, and bacterial translocation, further amplifying systemic inflammation and immune dysregulation. In the central portion of the figure, the interconnected pathways of metabolic, immune, and neuroendocrine dysfunctions are highlighted. Chronic psycho-emotional stress and circadian rhythm disruption lead to persistent activation of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) and the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis, which, over time, results in cortisol resistance and SNS sensitization. This prolonged neuroendocrine dysfunction fosters low-grade inflammation and neuroinflammation, further impairing insulin and leptin signaling. Leptin resistance, in particular, contributes to a sustained activation of the JAK-STAT signaling pathway, which is known to promote chronic inflammation and fibrotic processes. The dysregulation of this pathway is likely responsible for the coexistence of pro-inflammatory and fibrosis-resolving macrophages in FS, perpetuating a pathological state where fibrosis is initiated but not efficiently resolved. Furthermore, gut microbiota dysbiosis and bacterial translocation contribute to the systemic immune activation, exacerbating the inflammatory environment and fibrosis progression in FS. On the right side of the figure, a multi-targeted, integrative treatment strategy for FS is proposed, addressing both systemic metabolic–immune imbalances and localized tissue pathology. These interventions include physiotherapy, exercise, dietary habits, oral health, mental health, and sleep quality.
Jcm 14 01780 g001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Navarro-Ledesma, S. Frozen Shoulder as a Metabolic and Immune Disorder: Potential Roles of Leptin Resistance, JAK-STAT Dysregulation, and Fibrosis. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 1780. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14051780

AMA Style

Navarro-Ledesma S. Frozen Shoulder as a Metabolic and Immune Disorder: Potential Roles of Leptin Resistance, JAK-STAT Dysregulation, and Fibrosis. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025; 14(5):1780. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14051780

Chicago/Turabian Style

Navarro-Ledesma, Santiago. 2025. "Frozen Shoulder as a Metabolic and Immune Disorder: Potential Roles of Leptin Resistance, JAK-STAT Dysregulation, and Fibrosis" Journal of Clinical Medicine 14, no. 5: 1780. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14051780

APA Style

Navarro-Ledesma, S. (2025). Frozen Shoulder as a Metabolic and Immune Disorder: Potential Roles of Leptin Resistance, JAK-STAT Dysregulation, and Fibrosis. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(5), 1780. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14051780

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop