Next Article in Journal
CaNO and eCO Might Be Potential Non-Invasive Biomarkers for Disease Severity and Exacerbations in Interstitial Lung Disease
Previous Article in Journal
Assessment of the Connection Between Maxillary Sinus Volume, Number of Surgical Interventions, and Craniofacial Development in Patients with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Patch Test Preparations: Basis and State-of-the-Art Modern Diagnostic Tools for Contact Allergy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Review

From Lab to Workplace: Efficacy of Skin Protection Creams Against Hydrophobic Working Materials

1
Peter Greven Physioderm GmbH, 53881 Euskirchen, Germany
2
Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Traumatology, The Research Center in Cooperation with AUVA, 1200 Vienna, Austria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(23), 8470; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14238470 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 26 August 2025 / Revised: 28 October 2025 / Accepted: 25 November 2025 / Published: 28 November 2025

Abstract

Occupational dermatoses represent a significant challenge across numerous industries. Therefore, occupational skin protection creams are frequently used as a preventative measure, yet their efficacy, particularly against hydrophobic working materials, remains inconclusive. This review provides an overview of the current knowledge concerning the mechanisms by which skin protection creams support skin barrier function, as well as the limitations of available testing methods. Current evaluation methods range from in vitro assays to ex vivo and in vivo models, each possessing distinct advantages and disadvantages. While several clinical studies demonstrate effectiveness against hydrophilic irritants, standardized and ethically viable methods for assessing protection against hydrophobic substances are lacking. Future research should focus on the development and validation of improved in vitro and ex vivo models, coupled with enhanced workplace simulation techniques, to facilitate a more accurate translation of laboratory findings to real-world occupational settings. Consistent and reliable testing is essential to ensure continued efficacy of these products in light of evolving regulatory landscapes.
Keywords: contact dermatitis; irritant; occupation; prevention; skin contact dermatitis; irritant; occupation; prevention; skin

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dick, A.; Metzger, M.; Dungel, P. From Lab to Workplace: Efficacy of Skin Protection Creams Against Hydrophobic Working Materials. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 8470. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14238470

AMA Style

Dick A, Metzger M, Dungel P. From Lab to Workplace: Efficacy of Skin Protection Creams Against Hydrophobic Working Materials. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025; 14(23):8470. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14238470

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dick, Anja, Magdalena Metzger, and Peter Dungel. 2025. "From Lab to Workplace: Efficacy of Skin Protection Creams Against Hydrophobic Working Materials" Journal of Clinical Medicine 14, no. 23: 8470. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14238470

APA Style

Dick, A., Metzger, M., & Dungel, P. (2025). From Lab to Workplace: Efficacy of Skin Protection Creams Against Hydrophobic Working Materials. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(23), 8470. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14238470

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop