Next Article in Journal
Cracking the Kinase Code: Urinary Biomarkers as Early Alarms for AAA Rupture—A Pilot Study
Previous Article in Journal
Mortality in Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in Elderly Polytrauma Patients at a European Level 1 Trauma Centre—A Retrospective Cohort Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Classifying Low Back Pain Through Pain Mechanisms: A Scoping Review for Physiotherapy Practice
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Earthing as a Supportive Therapy for Post-Spinal Surgery Recovery

1
Department of Neurosurgery, Functional and Stereotactic Neurosurgery, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University Toruń, 85-067 Bydgoszcz, Poland
2
Department of Pedagogy, Casmir Great University, 85-064 Bydgoszcz, Poland
3
Jan Biziel University Hospital nr 2, Collegium Medicum, 85-168 Bydgoszcz, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(11), 3844; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14113844
Submission received: 6 April 2025 / Revised: 21 May 2025 / Accepted: 21 May 2025 / Published: 29 May 2025

Abstract

:
Background/Objectives: Spinal surgery often results in injury to the paraspinal muscles and postoperative pain, which is associated with an elevated inflammatory response and increased creatine kinase (CK) levels. Earthing, a practice involving direct or indirect contact with the Earth, facilitates the movement of electric charge between the body and the Earth, thereby stabilizing electrical potentials and influencing biochemical and bioelectrical processes. This study aimed to investigate the effects of earthing on postoperative pain and biochemical parameters. Materials and Methods: The study included an earthing group (EG) of 42 patients (18 females) who underwent spinal surgery and were earthed during nighttime postoperative rest. Blood samples were collected to measure serum concentrations of sodium, potassium, urea, glucose, C-reactive protein (CRP), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), calcium, phosphates, CK, iron, ferritin, and transferrin. These parameters were assessed on the day after surgery and the day following earthing. A control group (CG) of 42 patients (25 females) who underwent surgery for lumbar spondylosis did not receive earthing. Results: The median reduction in the EG was significantly greater than in the CG (for CK 45.0 and 20.0 U/L; for ALP 6.0 and 1.0; for transferrin 0.17 and 0.08, respectively). The median CRP difference in the EG was 0.05 mg/dL, significantly lower than in the CG, 17.2 mg/dL. The median reduction in pain intensity in VAS score was greater in the EG–2.0 compared to the CG-1.0, acknowledging a strong analgesic effect of earthing (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Earthing after spinal surgery seems to promote recovery by reducing inflammation and pain, and accelerating general healing, suggesting its potential as a supportive postoperative therapy.

1. Introduction

Spinal surgery is associated with injury to the paraspinal muscles. The extent of muscle injury correlates with the type of surgery performed, such as microdiscectomy, endoscopic discectomy, micro decompression, or percutaneous spinal fusion. Minimally invasive methods generally result in less muscle injury and reduced postoperative pain, though these effects are not always conclusive [1,2]. It has been confirmed that serum creatine kinase (CK) levels are an indicator of muscle damage following spinal surgery [3,4]. CK is typically elevated in medical conditions such as myocardial infarction, muscular dystrophy, and cerebral diseases. Significant correlations have been found between the extent of spinal surgery—the number of levels fused and duration of surgery—and CK values [5]. Increased serum CK levels have also been linked to higher levels of postoperative pain. Spinal surgery is also associated with a certain degree of blood loss and destruction of spinal bone tissue. Direct contact with the Earth, whether barefoot or indirectly via a cable connected to a conductive system like a mat, sheet, or ankle band, establishes electrical equilibrium with the Earth. This connection influences bioelectrical processes and alters physiological parameters [6,7]. During earthing (grounding), charges of less than 10 nA flow between the human body and the ground in a charge-discharge cycle associated with movement [6,8]. The potential of the human body during movement with an established ground path is near zero, whereas when the ground path is interrupted, the potential fluctuates [6]. Earthing has been shown to reduce stress, improve sleep, alter cortisol excretion rhythms, reduce blood viscosity, modulate the autonomic nervous system, and heart rate variability [7]. Additionally, earthing could reduce symptoms of muscle damage and soreness after eccentric muscle contractions, as indicated by CK elevation [9]. Earthing has been identified as a potential anti-inflammatory factor that may influence calcium and phosphate homeostasis, as well as iron metabolism [10]. Studies have reported significant reductions in serum concentrations of sodium, potassium, magnesium, phosphate, calcium, iron, total protein, and albumin, alongside increases in transferrin, ferritin, and globulin fractions (α1, α2, β, and γ). A reduction in renal excretion of calcium and phosphorus was also observed. Furthermore, earthing was associated with notable effects on thyroid hormones, cortisol levels, and the metabolism of glucose and urea, particularly in the context of physical exercise [10,11,12,13]. Earthing therapy has been shown to accelerate wound healing in individuals with diabetes and to improve blood circulation, primarily through reduced blood viscosity and enhanced transport of nutrients and oxygen [14,15,16]. Evidence supporting decreased blood viscosity includes studies demonstrating reduced red blood cell aggregation following earthing therapy [17]. This study aimed to investigate changes in selected biochemical parameters in patients after lumbar spinal surgery and to determine whether earthing during postoperative nighttime relaxation impacts the recovery.

2. Materials and Methods

A prospective study was conducted in the Department of Neurosurgery, Functional and Stereotactic Neurosurgery at Jan Biziel University Hospital No. 2 in Bydgoszcz on 84 patients who underwent surgery for lumbar spondylosis. Participants were assigned to study groups using randomization methods. Two approaches were employed: simple first-degree randomization, in which each participant had an equal chance of being allocated to any group (achieved using a coin toss), and block randomization, which was used to maintain an equal number of participants in both the intervention and control groups. Clinical research was conducted in accordance with established ethical standards to ensure maximum safety for participants and to uphold their rights. Each participant provided written informed consent prior to enrollment and was given detailed information regarding the study. The investigator responsible for enrolling participants was required to explain all aspects of the study clearly, addressing any uncertainties or concerns raised by the participant. Ethical approval (Nr 197/2020) was obtained from the Ethics Committee at the Collegium Medicum of the Nicolaus Copernicus University in Bydgoszcz, Poland, in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Inclusion criteria were: qualification for surgical intervention of the lumbar spine and signed informed consent to participate in the study. Exclusion criteria were: diagnosed neoplastic disease and hemostatic disorders, pregnancy, and lack of signed informed consent. Patients were qualified for decompressive lumbar surgery. Most procedures were similar in terms of invasiveness, as the majority of patients underwent single-level lumbar spine surgery. Surgical approaches were either unilateral or bilateral. Microdecompression was commonly performed and included fenestration of the ligamentum flavum, partial medial facetectomy, foraminotomy, central flavectomy, hemilaminectomy, or laminectomy; laminectomy was always performed using a bilateral approach. Interspinous stabilization was also performed using a bilateral approach and was minimally invasive.
All patients were examined in the same manner. Blood samples were collected to measure serum concentrations of sodium, potassium, urea, glucose, C-reactive protein (CRP), alkaline phosphatase, calcium, phosphates, creatine kinase (CK), iron, ferritin, and transferrin. Analyses of CK and CRP were conducted in 84 patients, while additional biochemical parameters were evaluated in a subset of 56 patients.
These measurements were taken on the first day after surgery and on the second day after surgery. The effectiveness of earthing (grounding) was confirmed using an electrometer, which demonstrated a reduction in electrical potential following activation of the grounding system. Biochemical analyses were performed using the Cobas Integra 400 Plus Analyzer (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany), employing validated assays and calibrated procedures for the measurement of CRP, iron, phosphate, and CK levels.
Participants were divided into two groups:
Earthing group (EG) (n = 42): Patients were grounded via an adhesive electrode pad attached to the ankle and connected to the earthing system of an electrical socket Figure 1. Patients in the study group were earthed during nighttime rest between the first and the second day after surgery. Pain was assessed, and blood was collected and analyzed on the day after surgery and on the first and second mornings following surgery. Thirty-eight patients underwent surgery on one segment of the lumbar spine, and four patients underwent surgery on two segments of the lumbar spine. The most frequent was the L4/L5 level (24 patients), next the L5/S1 level (15 patients), and the L3/L4 level was operated on six patients.
Control group (CG) (n = 42): Patients received a sham intervention where the electrode pad was applied but not connected to the earthing system. The CG comprised patients who underwent similar surgeries for lumbar spondylosis. Thirty-six patients were operated on at one level of the lumbar spine, and six patients on two levels. The most frequent was the L4/L5 level (27 patients), ten at the L5/S1 level, and nine at the L3/L4 level. Patients in the CG did not undergo earthing; however, their blood samples were collected and analyzed using the same protocol on the first and second mornings following surgery. Pain was also assessed at the same time points.
The average age in the study group was 53 ± 14 years, while the CG had an average age of 60 ± 11 years. The intensity of pain was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) on the first day after surgery and on the second day after surgery, following a night of earthing in the EG and a night of sham-earthing in the CG. All patients were administered a uniform analgesic regimen comprising paracetamol.

Statistical Analysis

In the statistical analysis, frequency distributions, descriptive statistics, and significance tests were utilized. The chi-squared test was employed to examine differences between the demographic characteristics of the subjects. The analysis was conducted using the Statistica software version 13 package by Tibco Software Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA; statistical significance was assumed for tests meeting the condition of p < 0.05. For differences between groups in ordinal variables (VAS) or quantitative variables (biochemical indices and differential indices levels), the Mann–Whitney U test was used. For differences between measurements, the Wilcoxon test was applied. The choice of non-parametric tests was dictated by the sample sizes and the lack of normality in the distributions of most variables (verified using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test). In the conducted study, effect size was calculated using the rank-biserial correlation coefficient (rc) for matched pairs, derived from the Mann–Whitney or Wilcoxon test. The formula for this coefficient is appropriate for nonparametric comparisons. Effect sizes for selected outcomes: VAS (line 120): EG r = 0.60 (strong), CG r = 0.52 (strong); CK (line 129): EG r = 0.55 (strong), CG r = 0.37 (moderate); CRP (line 136): EG r = 0.16 (small), CG r = 0.59 (strong); ALP (line 142): EG r = 0.30 (small), CG r = 0.13 (small); Phosphates (line 151): EG r = 0.03 (small), CG r = 0.26 (small); Calcium: EG r = 0.25 (small), CG r = 0.08 (negligible); Transferrin: EG r = 0.33 (moderate), CG r = 0.12 (small); Ferritin: EG r = 0.09 (small), CG r = 0.25 (small); Iron: EG r = 0.21 (small), CG r = 0.005 (negligible)

3. Results

3.1. Effect of Earthing on Postoperative Pain (N = 84)

  • On postoperative day 1, mean VAS scores were 7.14 ± 1.41 (median = 7) in the EG and 6.6 ± 1.95 (median = 7) in the CG.
  • On postoperative day 2, pain significantly decreased in the EG to 4.64 ± 1.29 (median = 5), p < 0.05, compared to 5.26 ± 1.47 (median = 5) in the CG, p < 0.05.
  • The mean reduction in pain intensity was greater in the EG (2.50 points) (median = 2.0) compared to the CG (1.59 points) (median = 1.0), suggesting a meaningful analgesic effect of earthing in the experimental group (Figure 2, Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3). The difference in change in pain intensity between the two groups was statistically significant (p < 0.01)

3.2. Effect of Earthing on Postoperative Muscle Injury (N = 84)

  • Preoperative CK levels in the EG were 311.97 U/L (median = 208.5), decreasing to 257.36 U/L (median = 182.5) after one night of earthing (p < 0.0001).
  • In the CG, CK levels declined from 373.45 U/L (median = 307) to 332.95 U/L (median = 229.5) (p < 0.001).
  • The mean CK reduction in the EG (54.61 U/L) (median = 44.5 U/L) was greater than in the CG (40.5 U/L) (median = 26 U/L), indicating accelerated muscle recovery. However, the difference between the two groups was not significant. (Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3).

3.3. Effect of Earthing on Inflammatory Markers (N = 84)

  • Postoperative CRP levels increased significantly in both groups, but the rise was lower in the EG (15.34 mg/L to 24.42 mg/L) compared to the CG (24.54 mg/L to 57.42 mg/L).
  • The median CRP difference in the EG was 10.07 mg/dL, significantly lower than the CG 33.39 mg/dL (p < 0.001), suggesting a dampened inflammatory response in earthed patients (Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3, Figure 3).

3.4. Effect of Earthing on Calcium-Phosphate Metabolism (N = 56)

  • ALP decreased significantly in the EG from 65.5 U/L to 61.4 U/L; (median difference—6 U/L, compared to a smaller reduction in the CG (66.6 U/L to 65.1 U/L), (median difference—1.0) (p = 0.02). (Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3; Figure 4).
  • Phosphate levels increased significantly in the EG (p = 0.02), whereas calcium alterations were not statistically significant (Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3; Figure 5).

3.5. Effect of Earthing on Iron Metabolism (N = 56)

  • Transferrin levels declined more significantly in the EG (from 2.46 to 2.26 g/L) (median difference—0.17, p = 0.02) than in the CG (from 2.28 to 2.24 g/L) (median difference—0.08).
  • Ferritin variability was greater in the EG (145 ng/mL—no median change), with both increases and decreases, whereas the CG exhibited a more uniform rise (from 131 to 143 ng/mL) (p = 0.02).
  • Median Iron increased in EG from 40.5 to 48.8 µg/dL (p = 0.05) while in CG decreased from 43.5 to 34.5 µg/dL (p = 0.96) (Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3; Figure 6).

4. Discussion

This study highlights the potential benefits of earthing (grounding) in postoperative recovery following spinal surgery. The study demonstrated a significant reduction in pain intensity on the second day after surgery in patients who were earthed during the second night after surgery in comparison to patients who were not earthed. Patients who undergo spinal surgery often experience postoperative pain, which is associated with injury to the paraspinal muscles. The severity of this pain is related to the degree of surgical invasiveness [1,18]. Some studies suggest the analgetic effect of earthing; however, there is no scientific evidence [7,19]. In our study, the median visual analog scale (VAS) score was 7; however, patients who were earthed on the first postoperative night following lumbar surgery experienced greater pain relief. Minimally invasive procedures, such as endoscopic discectomy or microdecompression, are associated with minimal tissue damage, less muscle retraction, and lower postoperative pain [2]. Not all of our procedures met the criteria for minimally invasive surgery, particularly those involving two spinal segments. Extensive muscle damage is confirmed by elevated serum CK levels and severe postoperative pain [5]. Highly invasive surgery results in the highest postoperative to preoperative CK ratio, while minimally invasive surgery results in the lowest [20]. The CK enzyme is commonly used as an objective indicator of delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS), which is closely associated with muscle damage [21]. In our study, a greater reduction in CK levels was observed on the second postoperative day in patients who underwent earthing during the second postoperative night, compared with those who were not earthed. The median decrease in CK levels was greater in the EG than in the CG. However, despite a larger sample size in the EG (n = 42), statistical significance was not reached. It is likely that a narrower distribution of individual results would have increased the likelihood of reaching statistical significance. These findings align with previous reports demonstrating that grounding reduces inflammation, modulates metabolism and immune function, and accelerates recovery from delayed-onset muscle soreness (DOMS), though without significant reductions in pain intensity [9,10,11,12,13,22,23,24]. Based on the results of a pilot study conducted in 2010, the authors observed that grounding the body to the earth reduces markers of inflammation, modulates immune system activity, and accelerates recovery from DOMS, as indicated by faster reduction in creatine kinase levels [9]. This phenomenon could be attributed to the anti-inflammatory effects of negative charge supply and electron participation. Brown et al. identified markers of earthing in correlations between white blood cells, bilirubin, creatine kinase, and inorganic phosphorus among grounded subjects [24]. Participants who were not grounded reported higher pain perception associated with DOMS in the same study. In a study conducted by Pantoja et al. in 2009, levels of creatine kinase (CK) were measured in participants performing resistance exercises in water and on land. It was observed that individuals who were grounded in water showed a decrease in CK levels 24 h after exercise, with a further decrease observed 48 h post-exercise. In contrast, participants who exercised on land showed an increase in CK levels [25]. The smaller difference in inflammatory markers between the second and third postoperative days in individuals who were earthed during the second night suggests a potentially attenuated inflammatory response to surgical injury, compared to controls who were not earthed. This is supported by a significantly smaller increase in CRP levels observed in the EG. Effect sizes were clinically meaningful for the VAS and CK parameters, indicating substantial changes in both studied groups. A strong effect size was observed for CRP in the CG, suggesting that the inflammatory process remained unaffected. It is important to note that surgical trauma typically induces a CRP elevation, with peak levels occurring between the second and third day postoperatively, most commonly on the second day [26,27]. Earthing significantly impacts various physiological processes; an 8-h grounding session can notably alter calcium-phosphate homeostasis, reducing ionized calcium and inorganic phosphorus levels and affecting iron metabolism, leading to decreased iron levels and increased levels of transferrin and ferritin. Additionally, earthing reduces concentrations of sodium, potassium, and magnesium, while promoting an increase in globulins A1, A2, B, and G [10]. Earthing after exercise alters protein metabolism during recovery, leading to changes in blood urea and creatinine levels [12]. Earthing reduces the cardinal signs of inflammation following injury, leading to the resolution of symptoms such as swelling, redness, and pain [28]. Müller et al. demonstrated that earthing during nighttime rest promotes muscle recovery following intense eccentric muscle loading from exercise. Markers of inflammation, such as IP-10, MIP-1α, sP-Selectin, and CK, were more pronounced in athletes who did not undergo earthing compared to those who were earthed. Earthing during nighttime sleep reduced inflammation symptoms and contributed to a lesser increase in CK levels induced by intensive eccentric muscle loading in grounded participants [22]. These findings align with the results of our study, which demonstrate accelerated recovery from surgical injury when patients undergo earthing during sleep. This is evidenced by reduced CK levels, a smaller increase in CRP, an increase in phosphate concentrations, and normalization of calcium-phosphate metabolism leading to the healing of bones injured during surgery, as well as diminished pain perception in earthed patients. Prior studies have suggested that earthing can mitigate oxidative stress by providing electrons that attenuate free radicals, thereby reducing tissue damage and promoting healing [7]. Earthing provides an electric charge that helps neutralize the detrimental reactions of free radical species associated with the inflammatory process [7,28]. Earthing might be seen as an important factor promoting the healing of muscle soreness and damage following spinal surgery in rehabilitated patients, utilizing the same mechanisms that enhance acute and long-term recovery after intensive exercises [22]. In our study, the increase in serum iron concentration, along with a decrease in transferrin and stable ferritin levels in the experimental group, may suggest an enhanced readiness for iron utilization in response to postoperative blood loss. In this report, earthing was associated with a reduction in alkaline phosphatase levels, consistent with previous findings. However, the effect on inorganic phosphate levels differed; whereas earlier studies reported a decrease after 1 to 8 h of earthing, our results showed a slight elevation [10]. Phosphate concentrations normally tend to decrease following, e.g., gastrointestinal surgery [29]. These alterations observed in patients following spinal surgery warrant further investigation. The credibility of our study is strengthened by the use of a sham-earthing setup, which was identical in appearance (Figure 1) and installation to the true earthing system, thereby minimizing the placebo effect. The only difference was the disconnection of the electrical circuit via a closed switch housed within a plastic enclosure, effectively preventing grounding while maintaining blinding. In conclusion, earthing following spinal surgery may support recovery from iatrogenic injury to paraspinal muscles and spinal structures, as suggested by a reduced inflammatory response and trends toward normalization in creatine kinase, calcium-phosphate, and iron metabolism. These findings warrant further investigation in larger, controlled studies.

Limitations

The changes in biochemical parameters were minor and not clearly distinguishable. The relatively small sample size and the use of single-time-point observations following the earthing intervention limit the interpretability of the results. Additionally, the study population was heterogeneous due to the inclusion of various types of lumbar spine surgeries, such as fenestrations, laminectomies, and discectomies, each involving varying degrees of bone and soft tissue disruption. However, in the majority of cases, the overall level of surgical invasiveness was comparable. The clinical application of earthing remains a relatively underexplored and somewhat controversial area, with only a limited number of high-quality studies available. In this context, we considered earthing as a potential complementary intervention rather than a primary treatment modality. Future studies with larger, more homogeneous groups, extended follow-up periods, and more comprehensive data collection would likely yield clearer outcomes and help reveal statistical trends, thereby facilitating interpretation.

5. Conclusions

Earthing appears to be a supportive intervention that reduces postoperative pain and mitigates the inflammatory response following spinal surgery, reflected by a lower increase in CRP levels among earthed patients. The observed impact on calcium-phosphate and iron metabolism suggests that earthing may influence broader physiological processes. Reduced ALP levels in the earthed group may indicate improved bone turnover, while changes in transferrin and ferritin levels may reflect favorable, altered iron homeostasis. These findings support the need for further research into the potential integration of earthing into postoperative protocols to enhance recovery and improve patient outcomes

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.S.; methodology, M.B.; software, M.Z.; validation, P.S., M.B. and M.Z.; formal analysis, M.Z. and P.S.; investigation, M.B.; resources, P.S. and M.B.; data curation, M.B. and J.S.; writing—original draft preparation, P.S., M.B. and J.S.; writing—review and editing, PS, M.B. and M.Z.; visualization, M.Z.; supervision, P.S.; project administration, P.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Bioethics Commited of Collegium Medicum of the Nicolaus Copernicus University, protocol code 197/2020 and date of approval: 28 April 2020.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

DATA are available on demand.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
DOMSDelayed onset muscle soreness
CKcreatine kinase
CRPC—reactive protein

References

  1. Arts, M.; Brand, R.; Kallen, B. Van Der Does Minimally Invasive Lumbar Disc Surgery Result in Less Muscle Injury than Conventional Surgery? A Randomized Controlled Trial. Eur. Spine J. 2011, 20, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Peng, H.; Tang, G.; Zhuang, X.; Lu, S.; Bai, Y.; Xu, L. Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Decreases Postoperative Pain and Inflammation for Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. Exp. Ther. Med. 2019, 18, 3032–3036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Baird, M.F.; Graham, S.M.; Baker, J.S.; Bickerstaff, G.F. Creatine-Kinase- and Exercise-Related Muscle Damage Implications for Muscle Performance and Recovery. J. Nutr. Metab. 2012, 2012, 960363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sang, P.; Ma, Y.; Chen, B.; Zhang, M. The Role of Serum Creatine Kinase Levels in Anterior Cervical Spinal Surgery: Change Trends and Risk Factors. Medicine 2021, 100, e28300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lombao, D.; Bagó, J.; Vilor, T. Validity of Creatine Kinase as an Indicator of Muscle Injury in Spine Surgery and Its Relation with Postoperative Pain. Acta Orthop. Belg. 2014, 80, 545–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sokal, K.; Sokal, P. Earthing the Human Organism Influences Bioelectrical Processes. J. Altern. Complement. Med. 2012, 18, 229–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Chevalier, G.; Sinatra, S.T.; Oschman, J.L.; Sokal, K.; Sokal, P. Earthing: Health Implications of Reconnecting the Human Body to the Earth’s Surface Electrons. J. Environ. Public Health 2012, 2012, 291541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chamberlin, K.; Smith, W.; Chirgwin, C.; Appasani, S.; Rioux, P. Analysis of the Charge Exchange between the Human Body and Ground: Evaluation of “Earthing” from an Electrical Perspective. J. Chiropr. Med. 2014, 13, 239–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chevalier, G.; Brown, R.; Hill, M. Grounding after Moderate Eccentric Contractions Reduces Muscle Damage. Open Access J. Sports Med. 2015, 6, 305–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sokal, K.; Sokal, P. Earthing the Human Body Influences Physiologic Processes. J. Altern. Complement. Med. 2011, 17, 301–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sokal, P.; Jastrzębski, Z.; Sokal, K.; Dargiewicz, R.; Jastrzębska, M.; Radzimiński, Ł. Earthing Modulates Glucose and Erythrocytes Metabolism in Exercise. Int. J. Phys. Educ. Sports Health 2016, 3, 6–13. [Google Scholar]
  12. Sokal, P.; Jastrzȩbski, Z.; Jaskulska, E.; Sokal, K.; Jastrzȩbska, M.; Radzimiński, Ł.; Dargiewicz, R.; Zieliński, P. Differences in Blood Urea and Creatinine Concentrations in Earthed and Unearthed Subjects during Cycling Exercise and Recovery. Evid. -Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2013, 2013, 382643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Chevalier, G.; Mori, K.; Oschman, J.L. The Effect of Earthing (Grounding) on Human Physiology. Eur. Biol. Bioelectromagn. 2006, 2, 600–621. [Google Scholar]
  14. Brown, R.; Chevalier, G. Grounding the Human Body during Yoga Exercise with a Grounded Yoga Mat Reduces Blood Viscosity. Open J. Prev. Med. 2015, 5, 159–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chevalier, G.; Melvin, G.; Barsotti, T. One-Hour Contact with the Earth’s Surface (Grounding) Improves Inflammation and Blood Flow—A Randomized, Double-Blind, Pilot Study. Health N. Hav. 2015, 7, 1022–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Estiningtyas, E.; Novitayanti, E.; Proborini, C.A.; Cahyaningtyas, A.Y.; Muflikhun, M.A. Earthing Method as a Lifestyle Medicine to Accelerate the Healing of Chronic Diabetic Wounds. J. Health Sci. Prev. 2024, 8, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chevalier, G.; Sinatra, S.T.; Oschman, J.L.; Delany, R.M. Earthing (Grounding) the Human Body Reduces Blood Viscosity—A Major Factor in Cardiovascular Disease. J. Altern. Complement. Med. 2013, 19, 102–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Abdelmageed Makia, M.; Abdelbary, T.; AlBakry, A. Paraspinal Muscle Damage in Intermuscular and Conventional Lumbar Spinal Fixation: A Comparative Study. Interdiscip. Neurosurg. 2021, 26, 101284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chevalier, G.; Patel, S.; Weiss, L.; Chopra, D.; Mills, P.J. The Effects of Grounding (Earthing) on Bodyworkers’ Pain and Overall Quality of Life: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Explore 2019, 15, 181–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Arts, M.P.; Nieborg, A.; Brand, R.; Peul, W.C. Serum Creatine Phosphokinase as an Indicator of Muscle Injury after Various Spinal and Nonspinal Surgical Procedures. J. Neurosurg. Spine 2007, 7, 282–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Eston, R.G.; Mickleborough, J.; Baltzopoulos, V. Eccentric Activation and Muscle Damage: Biomechanical and Physiological Considerations during Downhill Running. Br. J. Sports Med. 1995, 29, 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Müller, E.; Pröller, P.; Ferreira-Briza, F.; Aglas, L.; Stöggl, T. Effectiveness of Grounded Sleeping on Recovery after Intensive Eccentric Muscle Loading. Front. Physiol. 2019, 10, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ghaly, M.; Teplitz, D. The Biologic Effects of Grounding the Human Body During Sleep as Measured by Cortisol Levels and Subjective Reporting of Sleep, Pain, and Stress. J. Altern. Complement. Med. 2004, 10, 767–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Brown, D.; Chevalier, G.; Hill, M. Pilot Study on the Effect of Grounding on Delayed-Onset Muscle Soreness. J. Altern. Complement. Med. 2010, 16, 265–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Pantoja, P.; Alberton, C.; Pilla, C.; Vendrusculo, A.; Kruel, L. Effect of Resistive Exercise on Muscle Damage in Water and on Land. J. Strength. Cond. Res. 2009, 23, 1051–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sereda, A.P.; Rukina, A.N.; Trusova, Y.V.; Dzhavadov, A.A.; Cherny, A.A.; Bozhkova, S.A.; Shubnyakov, I.I.; Tikhilov, R.M. Dynamics of C-Reactive Protein Level after Orthopedic Surgeries. J. Orthop. 2024, 47, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Schmidt, F.; Ward, M.; Repanos, C. Postoperative Serum C-Reactive Protein Dynamics after Pharyngolaryngectomy with Jejunal Free-Flap Reconstruction. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 2023, 105, 263–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Oschman, J.L.; Chevalier, G.; Brown, R. The Effects of Grounding (Earthing) on Inflammation, the Immune Response, Wound Healing, and Prevention and Treatment of Chronic Inflammatory and Autoimmune Diseases. J. Inflamm. Res. 2015, 8, 83–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sadot, E.; Zheng, J.; Srouji, R.; Strong, V.E.; Gönen, M.; Balachandran, V.P.; D’Angelica, M.I.; Allen, P.J.; DeMatteo, R.P.; Kingham, T.P.; et al. Hypophosphatemia as a Predictor of Organ-Specific Complications Following Gastrointestinal Surgery: Analysis of 8034 Patients. World J. Surg. 2019, 43, 385–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The experimental earthing setup and the sham earthing setup (with no internal wire connections in the socket) appeared identical in appearance.
Figure 1. The experimental earthing setup and the sham earthing setup (with no internal wire connections in the socket) appeared identical in appearance.
Jcm 14 03844 g001
Figure 2. Differences in intensity of pain in VAS before and after earthing or sham-earthing between the experimental and control groups, p < 0.01.
Figure 2. Differences in intensity of pain in VAS before and after earthing or sham-earthing between the experimental and control groups, p < 0.01.
Jcm 14 03844 g002
Figure 3. Comparison of pre- and post-intervention differences in CRP levels between the experimental group (earthing) and the control group (sham-earthing), p < 0.01.
Figure 3. Comparison of pre- and post-intervention differences in CRP levels between the experimental group (earthing) and the control group (sham-earthing), p < 0.01.
Jcm 14 03844 g003
Figure 4. Comparison of pre- and post-intervention differences in ALP levels between the experimental group (earthing) and the control group (sham-earthing), p = 0.02.
Figure 4. Comparison of pre- and post-intervention differences in ALP levels between the experimental group (earthing) and the control group (sham-earthing), p = 0.02.
Jcm 14 03844 g004
Figure 5. Comparison of pre- and post-intervention differences in phosphate levels between the experimental group (earthing) and the control group (sham-earthing), p = 0.02.
Figure 5. Comparison of pre- and post-intervention differences in phosphate levels between the experimental group (earthing) and the control group (sham-earthing), p = 0.02.
Jcm 14 03844 g005
Figure 6. Comparison of pre- and post-intervention transferrin alterations between the experimental group (earthing) and the control group (sham-earthing).
Figure 6. Comparison of pre- and post-intervention transferrin alterations between the experimental group (earthing) and the control group (sham-earthing).
Jcm 14 03844 g006
Table 1. Results of the non-parametric analysis with the Mann–Whitney U test, presenting the sum of ranks of measured parameters before and after earthing, evaluated in both the earthing and control groups. U—compares the ranks of values from two independent samples. Z—a standardized version of the U.
Table 1. Results of the non-parametric analysis with the Mann–Whitney U test, presenting the sum of ranks of measured parameters before and after earthing, evaluated in both the earthing and control groups. U—compares the ranks of values from two independent samples. Z—a standardized version of the U.
ParameterU Mann-Whitney Test. Statistical Significance p < 0.05000
Sum.of Ranks exp EGSum of Ranks contr CGUZpZ corpN.expN.contrp
VAS before1843.51726.5823.50.518870.6038510.535620.59221842420.602522
VAS after15542016651−2.062070.039202−2.14750.03175542420.038749
Na [mmol/L] before791.5804.5385.5−0.098320.921677−0.099270.92092228280.915857
Na [mmol/L] after893.5702.5296.51.556750.1195311.567040.11710628280.118157
K [mmol/L] before737859331−0.99140.321489−0.991740.32132428280.324159
K [mmol/L] after726870320−1.171660.241335−1.171980.24120628280.243438
urea [mg/dL] before838.5757.5351.50.655470.5121630.656230.5116828280.509859
urea [mg/dL] after8157813750.270380.7868660.270670.78664528280.788512
glucose [mg/dL] before8337633570.565350.5718390.565520.57172128280.574634
glucose [mg/dL] after681915275−1.909070.056254−1.911030.05600228280.05581
CRP [mg/L] before1574.51995.5671.5−1.878670.06029−1.87880.06027342420.059425
CRP [mg/L] after1479.52090.5576.5−2.728550.006362−2.728630.0063642420.005849
ALP [U/L] before790806384−0.12290.902185−0.122940.90215228280.90297
ALP [U/L] after731.5864.5325.5−1.081530.279462−1.082490.27903428280.278221
Ca [mmol/L] before815.5780.5374.50.278580.780570.27880.78039828280.776022
Ca [mmol/L] after760.5835.5354.5−0.606310.544307−0.606990.5438628280.541771
Pi [mmol/L] before678.5917.5272.5−1.950030.051173−1.951070.0510528280.049667
Pi [mmol/L] after8477493430.794760.4267530.795030.42659528280.429735
CK [U/L] before1612.51957.5709.5−1.538720.123873−1.538780.1238642420.123207
CK [U/L] after15692001666−1.927880.053871−1.927940.05386342420.053555
Fe [ug/dL] before8217753690.36870.7123490.368830.71225528280.714479
Fe [ug/dL] after8827143081.36830.1712191.36870.17109428280.172551
Ferritin [ng/mL] before822.5773.5367.50.393280.694110.39330.694128280.69034
Ferritin [ng/mL] after8207763700.352320.7246010.352340.72458728280.726657
Transferin [g/L] before8147823760.2540.7994990.254030.79947228280.801056
Transferin [g/L] after771825365−0.434250.664106−0.434350.66403628280.666507
Table 2. Postoperative changes in pain and biochemical parameters before and after earthing were evaluated in both the earthing and control groups, including comparisons of means, medians, and standard deviations.
Table 2. Postoperative changes in pain and biochemical parameters before and after earthing were evaluated in both the earthing and control groups, including comparisons of means, medians, and standard deviations.
DifferencesGroupNMeanMedianMinimumMaximumStd.dev
dif VASex422.52.5−171.62676
dif Naex28−0.9286−100.000−8.00040.000272.068
dif Kex28433.2140.000000.0001010.0005086.806
dif ureaex2840.357450.000−7.000190.000600.914
dif GLUex28372.1433450.000−24.0001570.0003660.435
dif CRPex42−10.07620.05−102.913.224.16638
dif ALPex2841.429600.000−22.000130.000819.085
dif calciumex280.04000.04000−0.1100.18000.07832
dif phosphateex28−0.02960.03500−0.6100.54000.24606
dif CKex4254.61944.5−12825069.79131
dif ironex28−93.571−600.000−58.000570.0002463.393
dif ferritinex2839.286350.000−85.0001410.0004528.096
dif transferrinex280.20460.17000−0.37012,9000.35132
dif VASctr421.59521−251.53113
dif NActr280.25000.0000−6.00060.000257.660
dif Kctr28438.57140.0000.0001010.0005,043,640
dif ureactr2835,35730.000−6.000150.000522.446
dif GLUctr28276.429180.000−38.0001340.0003894.366
dif CRPctr42−33.3857−17.2−277.61.648.93226
dif ALPctr2815.35710.000−8.000190.000570.563
dif CActr280.01640.0200−0.1300.26000.09318
dif phosphatectr280.11430.1150−0.4400.56000.24990
dif CKctr4240.526−29532596.83661
dif ironctr28−0.4643−20.000−51.000370.0001778.781
dif ferritinctr28−97.857−120.000−84.000700.0002725.919
dif transferrinctr280.09430.0850−1.20018.5000.55129
Table 3. Statistical significance of differences between postoperative parameters before and after earthing in the earthing group (EG) and in the control group (CG). Statistically significant values of differences of VAS, CRP, phosphates, and ferritin are highlighted in bold. U—compares the ranks of values from two independent samples. Z—a standardized version of the U.
Table 3. Statistical significance of differences between postoperative parameters before and after earthing in the earthing group (EG) and in the control group (CG). Statistically significant values of differences of VAS, CRP, phosphates, and ferritin are highlighted in bold. U—compares the ranks of values from two independent samples. Z—a standardized version of the U.
Differences in ParametersSum of Ranks EGSum of Ranks CGUZp
dif VAS2071.5001498.500595.5002.5585740.010511
dif NA705.000891.000299.000−1.5160.129575
dif K787.500808.500381.500−0.1640.889223
dif urea819.000777.000371.0000.3360.736924
dif GLU867.500728.500322.5001.1310.258186
dif CRP2249.5001320.500417.5004.1509720.000033
dif ALP936.500659.500253.5002.2610.023736
dif Calcium869.000727.000321.0001.1550.247980
dif phosphate656.500939.500250.500−2.3110.020859
dif CK1855.0001715.000812.0000.6217510.534106
dif iron703.500892.500297.500−1.5400.123473
dif ferritin918.500677.500271.5001.9660.049251
dif transferrin854.000742.000336.0000.909470.363103
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sokal, P.; Broda, M.; Zając, M.; Sokal, J. Earthing as a Supportive Therapy for Post-Spinal Surgery Recovery. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 3844. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14113844

AMA Style

Sokal P, Broda M, Zając M, Sokal J. Earthing as a Supportive Therapy for Post-Spinal Surgery Recovery. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025; 14(11):3844. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14113844

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sokal, Paweł, Maciej Broda, Magdalena Zając, and Julia Sokal. 2025. "Earthing as a Supportive Therapy for Post-Spinal Surgery Recovery" Journal of Clinical Medicine 14, no. 11: 3844. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14113844

APA Style

Sokal, P., Broda, M., Zając, M., & Sokal, J. (2025). Earthing as a Supportive Therapy for Post-Spinal Surgery Recovery. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(11), 3844. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14113844

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop