Next Article in Journal
Protocol Study for the Evaluation of Non-Opioid Balanced General Anaesthesia in Cardiac Surgery with Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Randomised, Controlled, Multicentric Superiority Trial (OFACAR Study)
Next Article in Special Issue
Nasal High-Flow (NHF) Improves Ventilation in Patients with Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD)—A Physiological Study
Previous Article in Journal
Patterns of Food Selectivity among Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Real-Life Study of Combined Treatment with Long-Term Non-Invasive Ventilation and High Flow Nasal Cannula in Patients with End-Stage Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 12
Issue 17
10.3390/jcm12175472
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of High-Flow Nasal Cannula on Right Heart Dysfunction in Patients with Acute-on-Chronic Respiratory Failure and Pulmonary Hypertension

by
Corrado Pelaia
1,†,
Giuseppe Armentaro
2,†,
Chiara Lupia
1,
Antonio Maiorano
1,
Nicola Montenegro
1,
Sofia Miceli
2,
Valentino Condoleo
2,
Velia Cassano
2,
Andrea Bruni
2,
Eugenio Garofalo
2,
Claudia Crimi
3,
Alessandro Vatrella
4,
Girolamo Pelaia
1,
Federico Longhini
2,* and
Angela Sciacqua
2
1
Department of Health Sciences, University “Magna Græcia” of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
2
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University “Magna Græcia” of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
3
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy
4
Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, 84081 Salerno, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(17), 5472; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12175472
Submission received: 3 August 2023 / Revised: 20 August 2023 / Accepted: 23 August 2023 / Published: 23 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue High Flow Nasal Cannula in Acute and Chronic Settings: Trends of Use and Outcomes)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) has several benefits in patients affected by different forms of acute respiratory failure, based on its own mechanisms. We postulated that HFNC may have some advantages over conventional oxygen therapy (COT) on the heart function in patients with acute-on-chronic respiratory failure with concomitant pulmonary hypertension (PH). We therefore designed this retrospective observational study to assess if HFNC improves the right and left ventricle functions and morphologies, arterial blood gases (ABGs), and patients’ dyspnea, compared to COT. We enrolled 17 hospitalized patients receiving HFNC, matched with 17 patients receiving COT. Echocardiographic evaluation was performed at the time of admission (baseline) and 10 days after (T10). HFNC showed significant improvements in right ventricular morphology and function, and a reduction in sPAP. However, there were no significant changes in the left heart measurements with HFNC application. Conversely, COT did not lead to any modifications in echocardiographic measurements. In both groups, oxygenation significantly improved from baseline to T10 (in the HFNC group, from 155 ± 47 to 204 ± 61 mmHg while in the COT group, from 157 ± 27 to 207 ± 27 mmHg; p < 0.0001 for both comparisons). In conclusion, these data suggest an improvement of oxygenation with both treatments; however, only HFNC was able to improve the right ventricular morphology and function after 10 days from the beginning of treatment in a small cohort of patients with acute-on-chronic respiratory failure with PH.

1. Introduction

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a condition characterized by a mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) greater than 20 mmHg [1]. The primary form is represented by group 3, which includes PH associated with lung diseases and accounts for approximately 90% of all PH cases [2]. The key pathogenic mechanisms that lead to PH due to pulmonary disease are represented by hypoxia-induced vasoconstriction [3], remodeling, inflammation, and thrombosis [4,5], while the main clinical symptom is dyspnea, associated with progressive exercise intolerance [6].
Treatment of PH includes calcium channel blockers, prostacyclin analogues, endothelin 1 (ET-1) receptor antagonists, phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors, and supportive therapy with diuretics, oral anticoagulants, and especially in group 3 PH, conventional oxygen therapy (COT) [7]. Several previous studies demonstrated that oxygen supplementation decreases mPAP and improves right ventricle (RV) function [3,8,9,10].
High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is an innovative device that combines an air–oxygen blender with an active humidifier, capable of delivering humidified gas at a flow rate of up to 60 L/min providing a constant and precise fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2), which can be set between 21% and 100% [11].
HFNC has shown several physiological benefits [12], including a reduction in work of breathing and respiratory rate, and improvement of dyspnea and respiratory dynamics, facilitated by the washout of the anatomic dead space [13]. HFNC also improves mucociliary clearance [14] and generates a modest positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) effect, resulting in an increase in end-expiratory lung volume (EELV) and prevention of alveolar closure [13]. Moreover, it provides good patient tolerance and comfort [15]. As a result, it could be an alternative oxygen-delivery strategy for patients with PH, theoretically combining adequate oxygenation, dyspnea relief, and patient comfort [12].
Indeed, HFNC is recommended as the first-line treatment in patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure and in selected patients with hypercapnic respiratory failure [16]. However, to date, there are no studies specifically investigating the role of HFNC in patients with PH [17].
We aim to assess if HFNC improves the right and left ventricle functions and morphologies in patients with acute-on-chronic respiratory failure and PH. Secondarily, we will assess if HFNC improves arterial blood gases (ABGs) and patients’ dyspnea compared to COT.

2. Materials and Methods

This observational, retrospective, case–control study was conducted at the University Hospital “Renato Dulbecco” in Catanzaro, Italy. The study adhered to the principles outlined by the Declaration of Helsinki and its amendments. Approval for the study was obtained from the local Ethics Committee “Comitato Etico Sezione Area Centro—Regione Calabria” under protocol number 118/2023 on 20 April 2023. Written informed consent was obtained from all participating patients. Additionally, all individual datasets generated during and/or analyzed throughout the study have been de-identified and are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

2.1. Patients

We included all adult patients (i.e., ≥18 years old) who were referred to the Respiratory Unit with a diagnosis of acute-on-chronic respiratory failure and PH. The diagnosis of acute-on-chronic respiratory failure was defined as worsening dyspnea associated with an arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) < 60 mmHg on room air [18].
Patients with any of the following conditions were excluded from the study: (1) inability to provide informed consent; (2) withdrawal of consent; (3) active cancer; (4) advanced liver cirrhosis (Child–Pugh C); (5) renal insufficiency (baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate—eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2); and (6) inclusion in other ongoing research protocols.

2.2. High Flow through Nasal Cannula (HFNC) and Conventional Oxygen Therapy (COT)

The group of patients who received HFNC was treated with a dedicated device (AIRVO2, Fisher&Paykel Healthcare, Auckland, New Zealand). The size of the nasal cannula was chosen to occlude approximately 2/3 of the patient’s nostril. The flow rate and temperature were initially set at 60 L/min and 37 °C, respectively. However, in case of discomfort, the flow and/or temperature were adjusted to the most tolerated setting [13,19]. The FiO2 was set to maintain a peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) level above 90%.
On the other hand, COT was administered through a Venturi mask. Like the HFNC group, the FiO2 was adjusted to maintain SpO2 above 90%. Patients in the COT group were matched for age, sex, BMI, PH etiology, and therapy.

2.3. Data Collection and Echocardiographic Assessments

All data were collected and recorded in a custom-made database using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft, Washington, DC, USA). Anthropometric data, including age, gender, body mass index, and smoking habits, were recorded, along with information on pharmacological therapy (use of antifibrotic therapy, inhaled treatment, antibiotics, and diuretics), and the presence of comorbidities at hospital admission (baseline). Additionally, data regarding TransThoracic Echocardiography (TTE) and arterial blood gases (ABGs) were collected at baseline and around 10 days after the initiation of patients’ treatment (T10).
TTE was performed following the recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) [20]. Recordings were conducted using a VIVID 7 Pro ultrasound system (GE Technologies, Milwaukee, WI, USA) and a 2.5 MHz transducer. All assessments were performed by a single operator who was an expert in the technique.
Tricuspid regurgitant velocity (TRV) was analyzed by continuous Doppler at the level of the atrioventricular plane of the tricuspid valve, either in projection with the four apical chambers or, in the case of eccentric jets, in parasternal short axis. Subsequently, the systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (sPAP) was derived using the Bernoulli equation to assess the right ventricular (RV) systolic pressure [20]. Measurements of the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) diameter, right atrium area (RAA), inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter, interventricular septal thickness (IVST), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and left atrial volume index (LAVI) were obtained according to ASE recommendations [20]. The tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), which reflects the right longitudinal function, was recorded at the free wall of the RV by assessing the movement of the tricuspid annulus [21]. Furthermore, we calculated the TAPSE/sPAP ratio to assess the RV length/strength relationship [22,23].
ABG measurements included PaO2, partial arterial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2), pH, and bicarbonates (HCO3−).
Patients’ dyspnea was measured using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale. After providing a detailed explanation before initiating the protocol, patients were asked to indicate a number between 0 (no discomfort/dyspnea) and 10 (worst possible discomfort/dyspnea) on an adapted printed scale [24,25].

2.4. Statistical Analysis

To assess the normal distribution of data, we utilized the Anderson–Darling test. Continuous variables were presented as either mean ± standard deviation (SD) or median [25th–75th interquartile range] (IQR) based on their normal distribution. Categorical data were expressed as counts and percentages. For comparisons between groups, we employed the paired t-test or Mann–Whitney U-test for continuous variables, and Fisher’s test for categorical variables.
In both the HFNC and COT cohorts of patients, we computed the differences from T10 to baseline for all recorded parameters and compared them between treatments. Mean differences with corresponding 95% confidence intervals were calculated to evaluate the treatment effects.
To assess relationships between variables, we used the Pearson correlation coefficient (r) and performed linear regression analysis.
Statistical significance was set at a p-value < 0.05 for all tests. All statistical analyses were conducted using Prism version 9.4.0 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).

3. Results

We collected data from 34 adult patients, with 17 receiving HFNC and 17 receiving COT, from September 2019 to September 2020. The enrollment flowchart is reported in Figure 1. In particular, 436 patients were hospitalized in the study period with acute-on-chronic respiratory failure with PH. TTE was available at baseline and after 10 days in 91 patients; among these patients, 17 received HFNC during their hospital stay, and they have been matched with another 17 patients receiving COT.
Patients’ characteristics are shown in Table 1. The two study groups were balanced according to gender, body mass index, comorbidities, and therapy. The mean length of stay was similar between the HFNC and COT groups (11.8 ± 4.08 vs. 12.1 ± 4.5 days; p = 0.999).

3.1. TTE Measurements

Data from TTE are presented in Table 2. HFNC demonstrated significant improvements in right ventricular morphology and function, along with a reduction in sPAP. However, no significant changes were observed in the left heart measurements following the application of HFNC. On the other hand, COT did not lead to any modifications in TTE measurements.
Table 3 displays the treatment effect sizes of HFNC compared to COT on acquired TTE assessments at T10. HFNC exhibited its most substantial effect in reducing sPAP, improving right ventricle contraction (measured by TAPSE and TAPSE/sPAP), and slightly reducing preload (measured by IVC and RAA) when compared to COT.

3.2. Arterial Blood Gases and Comfort

In the HFNC cohort, oxygenation (i.e., PaO2/FiO2) significantly increased from 155 ± 47 to 204 ± 61 (p < 0.001). On the contrary, pH (7.42 ± 0.05 vs. 7.42 ± 0.03; p = 0.665), PaCO2 (49.2 ± 16.2 vs. 46.4 ± 11.1 mmHg; p = 0.234), and HCO3− (30.4 ± 6.8 mmol/L vs. 30.0 ± 6.2 mmol/L; p = 0.627) did not change from baseline to T10.
In the COT group, we also recorded a significant improvement of PaO2/FiO2 from 157 ± 27 to 207 ± 27 (p < 0.0001). In addition, no significant modifications were detected with respect to pH (7.41 ± 0.04 vs. 7.41 ± 0.03; p = 0.919), PaCO2 (45.0 ± 10.0 mmHg vs. 45.6 ± 7.4 mmHg; p = 0.734), and HCO3− (28.8 ± 5.8 mmol/L vs. 28.6 ± 4.0 mmol/L; p = 0.898).
Dyspnea was reported as reduced from 7 [7; 8] to 4 [4; 5] in the HFNC group and from 7 [7; 8] to 5 [4; 6] in the COT group (p < 0.001 for both comparisons).
At T10, we did not find any effect of the HFNC over COT on PaO2/FiO2 (−1.42, 95% CI [−26.33; 23.50]; p = 0.908), pH (−0.01, 95% CI [−0.03; 0.02]; p = 0.693), PaCO2 (−3.35, 95% CI [−9.19; 2.49]; p = 0.251), HCO3− (−0.26, 95% CI [−3.95; 3.43]; p = 0.886), and VAS (−0.64, 95% CI [−1.37; 0.08]; p = 0.081).

3.3. Correlation between TTE Measurements and Oxygenation Changes

In the HFNC group, only an sPAP decrease was found to be inversely correlated with PaO2/FiO2 (r = −0.512; p < 0.05). Conversely, no other statistically significant correlations were detected between PaO2/FiO2 change and variations in RAA (r = −0.09; p = 0.711), IVC diameter (r = −0.265; p = 0.302), TAPSE (r = 0.204; p = 0.433), TAPSE/sPAP (r = 0.273; p = 0.289), IVST (r = 0.162; p = 0.701), RVOT (r = 0.264; p = 0.494), LAVI (r = 0.089; p = 0.819), LVEF (r = 0.294; p = 0.288), and aortic root dimensions (r = −0.031; p = 0.936).
In the COT cohort of patients, no correlations were found between PaO2/FiO2 changes and variations in RAA (r = 0.128; p = 0.724), IVC diameter (r = −0.063; p = 0.854), sPAP (r = −0.235; p = 0.441), TAPSE (r = 0.163; p = 0.563), TAPSE/sPAP (r = 0.613; p = 0.106), IVST (r = −0.276; p = 0.439), RVOT (r = 0.467; p = 0.198), LAVI (r = 0.134; p = 0.731), LVEF (r = 0.140; p = 0.647), and aortic root dimensions (r = 0.114; p = 0.739).

4. Discussion

This study demonstrates that, in patients with acute-on-chronic respiratory failure and concomitant PH, both HFNC and COT improve oxygenation at T10, although only HFNC reduces sPAP and right ventricle function.
Several studies have reported that HFNC therapy improves oxygenation and reduces dyspnea in patients with hypoxemia of different origins and severity. However, few studies have explored the hemodynamic effects of HFNC and how the cardiopulmonary interactions may be influenced by the small changes in intrathoracic pressure caused by the flow delivered, as well as by the positive end-expiratory pressure effects generated, particularly in decompensated chronic pulmonary hypertension.
We believe that the observed reduction in dyspnea and hemodynamic effects are mainly due to an improvement in the ventilation-perfusion ratio and lung diffusion capacity (due to the small applied positive expiratory pressure), improvement in gas exchange (by the administration of more stable FiO2), and the administration of heated and humidified air –oxygen admixture. Indeed, chronic lung diseases are characterized by abnormalities of both the ventilation–perfusion ratio and lung diffusion capacity, resulting in gas exchange impairment [26]. Though correction of hypoxemia is one of the cornerstones of PH treatment [26], the use of HFNC may be controversial. HFNC generates a PEEP up to 7.4 cm H2O [27]. In patients with severe PH, this effect may increase pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and pulmonary artery pressures, exacerbating the hemodynamic burden on the right ventricle. In such cases, caution is warranted, and careful monitoring of the patient’s response is essential. Conversely, in patients with less severe PH, HFNC therapy may have a modest beneficial effect on pulmonary artery pressures. Of note, PEEP generated by HFNC maintains alveolar recruitment with a favorable effect on pulmonary artery pressures [13]. Beside the alveoli recruitment or prevention of further alveolar collapse [13,28,29], these effects are involved in lowering the right ventricular preload and the left ventricular afterload in patients with heart failure and acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema [30,31,32,33].
It should also be remarked that HFNC delivers a warm and humidified air–oxygen admixture, with a stable and precise FiO2 [13,25], which can mitigate hypoxemia [25] and reduce the strain on the pulmonary circulation. HFNC decreases the anatomic dead space by washing out carbon dioxide from the upper airways [34], and consequently may improve dyspnea while preserving comfort for the patient [35].
In this study, most enrolled patients had underlying interstitial lung diseases (ILD), which typically have a restrictive impairment characterized by a decrease in forced vital capacity, total lung capacity, and diffusing lung capacity for carbon monoxide, as well as a decreased exercise capacity. The reduction in lung compliance causes an increase in respiratory rate as a compensatory mechanism, while hypercapnia occurs only in the late phase of such diseases [36]. Within this context, hypoxemia-dependent pulmonary vasoconstriction leads to an increase in pulmonary arterial pressure [37]. Because of disease worsening, there will be a reduction in the vascular bed, an increase in the right ventricular afterload, and, ultimately, heart failure [38]. The clinical application of HFNC in ILDs with chronic respiratory failure requires further elucidation. However, compared to COT, HFNC may have a role in these patients as a palliative treatment [39].
We wondered if there were some beneficial effects of HFNC on dysfunctional right heart in patients with acute-on-chronic respiratory failure and PH. The available evidence is still not conclusive. In a study of 10 patients with heart failure and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III, Roca et al. demonstrated that after a 60 min trial with HFNC, there was a reduction in the inspiratory collapse of the IVC and right ventricular preload, while sPAP did not change [40]. In our study, we assessed the hemodynamic effects over a much longer time interval, demonstrating a beneficial effect on a wider range of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) parameters, including IVC diameter, right ventricle function, and sPAP. Similar findings were reported by Gupta et al. when studying three elderly and postpartum patients with PH, type I respiratory failure, and associated comorbidities [41]. The first two patients manifested PH as a consequence of valvular heart disease and pulmonary tuberculosis, respectively. The third one had primary PH [41]. However, they experienced only decreases in respiratory rate, improvements in oxygen saturation and PaO2, as well as subjective comfort using the HFNC device. Moreover, these patients did not undergo instrumental exams that could specifically prove an improvement in the right ventricle function and a reduction in PH.
To the best of our knowledge this is the first study that showed that HFNC therapy in patients with chronic lung diseases and concomitant PH can induce a greater improvement of right ventricle preload and function, compared to COT.
Our study has limitations. First, the small sample size and the single-center design may limit the generalizability of our findings. Second, we performed TEE but not a lung volume or airway pressure assessment [42]. As a result, based on the current literature, we can only speculate that HFNC improves PH and right heart performance because of a slight increase in intrathoracic pressure. Third, it would be interesting to assess if HFNC may improve some clinical outcomes as opposed to COT; in addition, it would be also relevant to compare patients with interstitial lung disease separately from those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. However, the small sample of patients precludes us from the possibility to perform such an analysis. Future research with a larger sample size should be focused on evaluating the effects of HFNC on clinical outcome and in patients with chronic lung diseases separately from those with interstitial lung disease with concomitant PH.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, HFNC ameliorates the right ventricle preload and function and sPAP in patients with acute-on-chronic respiratory failure and concomitant PH.
Although these are promising data, we cannot provide any definitive conclusion; further studies are therefore required to better understand the underlying mechanisms in this population of patients.

Author Contributions

All authors made a significant contribution to the reported work, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the local Ethics Commitee “Comitato Etico Sezione Area Centro—Regione Calabria” under protocol number 118/2023 on 20 April 2023.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The authors will share all the individual participant data collected during the trial after de-identification, to researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal. The full protocol and raw data are available at [email protected].

Conflicts of Interest

Longhini received speaking fees from Draeger, Intersurgical and Fisher & Paykel. The remaining authors have no conflict of interest to disclose. Longhini contributed to the development of a new helmet and they are designated as inventor (European Patent number 3320941) not related to the present manuscript. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

  1. Humbert, M.; Kovacs, G.; Hoeper, M.M.; Badagliacca, R.; Berger, R.M.; Brida, M.; Carlsen, J.; Coats, A.J.; Escribano-Subias, P.; Ferrari, P.; et al. 2022 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension. Eur. Respir. J. 2023, 61, 2200879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Nathan, S.D.; Barbera, J.A.; Gaine, S.P.; Harari, S.; Martinez, F.J.; Olschewski, H.; Olsson, K.M.; Peacock, A.J.; Pepke-Zaba, J.; Provencher, S.; et al. Pulmonary hypertension in chronic lung disease and hypoxia. Eur. Respir. J. 2019, 53, 1801914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Green, S.; Stuart, D. Oxygen and pulmonary arterial hypertension: Effects, mechanisms, and therapeutic benefits. Eur. J. Prev. Cardiol. 2021, 28, 127–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kazimierczyk, R.; Kamiński, K. The role of platelets in the development and progression of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Adv. Med. Sci. 2018, 63, 312–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Noordegraaf, A.V.; Chin, K.M.; Haddad, F.; Hassoun, P.M.; Hemnes, A.R.; Hopkins, S.R.; Kawut, S.M.; Langleben, D.; Lumens, J.; Naeije, R. Pathophysiology of the right ventricle and of the pulmonary circulation in pulmonary hypertension: An update. Eur. Respir. J. 2019, 53, 1801900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kim, D.; George, M.P. Pulmonary Hypertension. Med. Clin. N. Am. 2019, 103, 413–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mercurio, V.; Bianco, A.; Campi, G.; Cuomo, A.; Diab, N.; Mancini, A.; Parrella, P.; Petretta, M.; Hassoun, P.M.; Bonaduce, D. New Drugs, Therapeutic Strategies, and Future Direction for the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Curr. Med. Chem. 2019, 26, 2844–2864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hoeper, M.M.; Granton, J. Intensive Care Unit Management of Patients with Severe Pulmonary Hypertension and Right Heart Failure. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2011, 184, 1114–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jindal, S.K.; Agarwal, R. Long-term oxygen therapy. Expert Rev. Respir. Med. 2012, 6, 639–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Roberts, D.H.; Lepore, J.J.; Maroo, A.; Semigran, M.J.; Ginns, L.C. Oxygen Therapy Improves Cardiac Index and Pulmonary Vascular Resistance in Patients With Pulmonary Hypertension. Chest 2001, 120, 1547–1555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nishimura, M. High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy Devices. Respir. Care 2019, 64, 735–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zantah, M.; Pandya, A.; Jacobs, M.R.; Criner, G.J. The Mechanisms of Benefit of High-Flow Nasal Therapy in Stable COPD. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 3832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Longhini, F.; Pelaia, C.; Garofalo, E.; Bruni, A.; Placida, R.; Iaquinta, C.; Arrighi, E.; Perri, G.; Procopio, G.; Cancelliere, A.; et al. High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy for outpatients undergoing flexible bronchoscopy: A randomised controlled trial. Thorax 2022, 77, 58–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Crimi, C.; Nolasco, S.; Campisi, R.; Nigro, M.; Impellizzeri, P.; Cortegiani, A.; Noto, A.; Gramegna, A.; Vancheri, C.; Blasi, F.; et al. Long-Term Domiciliary High-Flow Nasal Therapy in Patients with Bronchiectasis: A Preliminary Retrospective Observational Case-Control Study. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 7323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Cortegiani, A.; Crimi, C.; Noto, A.; Helviz, Y.; Giarratano, A.; Gregoretti, C.; Einav, S. Effect of high-flow nasal therapy on dyspnea, comfort, and respiratory rate. Crit. Care 2019, 23, 201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Oczkowski, S.; Ergan, B.; Bos, L.; Chatwin, M.; Ferrer, M.; Gregoretti, C.; Heunks, L.; Frat, J.-P.; Longhini, F.; Nava, S.; et al. ERS clinical practice guidelines: High-flow nasal cannula in acute respiratory failure. Eur. Respir. J. 2022, 59, 2101574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Crimi, C.; Cortegiani, A. High-Flow Nasal Therapy in Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure: Past, Present, and Future. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 2666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lemiale, V.; Mokart, D.; Resche-Rigon, M.; Pène, F.; Mayaux, J.; Faucher, E.; Nyunga, M.; Girault, C.; Perez, P.; Guitton, C.; et al. Effect of Noninvasive Ventilation vs Oxygen Therapy on Mortality Among Immunocompromised Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure. JAMA 2015, 314, 1711–1719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cortegiani, A.; Longhini, F.; Madotto, F.; Groff, P.; Scala, R.; Crimi, C.; Carlucci, A.; Bruni, A.; Garofalo, E.; Raineri, S.M.; et al. High flow nasal therapy versus noninvasive ventilation as initial ventilatory strategy in COPD exacerbation: A multicenter non-inferiority randomized trial. Crit. Care 2020, 24, 692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lang, R.M.; Badano, L.P.; Mor-Avi, V.; Afilalo, J.; Armstrong, A.; Ernande, L.; Flachskampf, F.A.; Foster, E.; Goldstein, S.A.; Kuznetsova, T.; et al. Recommendations for Cardiac Chamber Quantification by Echocardiography in Adults: An Update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2015, 28, 233–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Armentaro, G.; Pelaia, C.; Cassano, V.; Miceli, S.; Maio, R.; Perticone, M.; Pastori, D.; Pignatelli, P.; Andreozzi, F.; Violi, F.; et al. Association between right ventricular dysfunction and adverse cardiac events in mild COPD patients. Eur. J. Clin. Investig. 2023, 53, e13887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Rudski, L.G.; Lai, W.W.; Afilalo, J.; Hua, L.; Handschumacher, M.D.; Chandrasekaran, K.; Solomon, S.D.; Louie, E.K.; Schiller, N.B. Guidelines for the Echocardiographic Assessment of the Right Heart in Adults: A Report from the American Society of Echocardiography: Endorsed by the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2010, 23, 685–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Guazzi, M.; Bandera, F.; Pelissero, G.; Castelvecchio, S.; Menicanti, L.; Ghio, S.; Temporelli, P.L.; Arena, R. Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion and pulmonary arterial systolic pressure relationship in heart failure: An index of right ventricular contractile function and prognosis. Am. J. Physiol. Circ. Physiol. 2013, 305, H1373–H1381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Oldenmenger, W.H.; de Raaf, P.J.; de Klerk, C.; van der Rijt, C.C. Cut Points on 0–10 Numeric Rating Scales for Symptoms Included in the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review. J. Pain Symptom Manag. 2013, 45, 1083–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Maggiore, S.M.; Jaber, S.; Grieco, D.L.; Mancebo, J.; Zakynthinos, S.; Demoule, A.; Ricard, J.-D.; Navalesi, P.; Vaschetto, R.; Hraiech, S.; et al. High-Flow Versus VenturiMask Oxygen Therapy to Prevent Reintubation in Hypoxemic Patients after Extubation: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2022, 206, 1452–1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bag, R.; Suleman, N.; Guntupalli, K.K. Respiratory failure in interstitial lung disease. Curr. Opin. Pulm. Med. 2004, 10, 412–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Groves, N.; Tobin, A. High flow nasal oxygen generates positive airway pressure in adult volunteers. Aust. Crit. Care 2007, 20, 126–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Corley, A.; Caruana, L.; Barnett, A.; Tronstad, O.; Fraser, J. Oxygen delivery through high-flow nasal cannulae increase end-expiratory lung volume and reduce respiratory rate in post-cardiac surgical patients. Br. J. Anaesth. 2011, 107, 998–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Pérez-Terán, P.; Marin-Corral, J.; Dot, I.; Sans, S.; Muñoz-Bermúdez, R.; Bosch, R.; Vila, C.; Masclans, J.R. Aeration changes induced by high flow nasal cannula are more homogeneous than those generated by non-invasive ventilation in healthy subjects. J. Crit. Care 2019, 53, 186–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Adhikari, P.; Bhattarai, S.; Gupta, A.; Ali, E.; Ali, M.; Riad, M.; Mostafa, J.A. Physiological Effects of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy and Its Use in Acute Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema. Cureus 2021, 13, e13372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hinojosa, W.; Iglesias, C.; Vera, S.; Marcos, M.; Uribarri, A.; Gómez, I.; Pastor, G. Prognostic impact of high flow nasal cannula compared to noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation in the treatment of acute pulmonary edema. Rev. Port. Cardiol. 2021, 40, 703–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Marjanovic, N.; Flacher, A.; Drouet, L.; Le Gouhinec, A.; Said, H.; Vigneau, J.-F.; Chollet, B.; Lefebvre, S.; Sebbane, M. High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Early Emergency Department Management of Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure Due to Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema. Respir. Care 2020, 65, 1241–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Ko, D.R.; Beom, J.; Lee, H.S.; You, J.S.; Chung, H.S.; Chung, S.P. Benefits of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy for Acute Pulmonary Edema in Patients with Heart Failure in the Emergency Department: A Prospective Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 1937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Inata, Y.; Takeuchi, M. Complex effects of high-flow nasal cannula therapy on hemodynamics in the pediatric patient after cardiac surgery. J. Intensiv. Care 2017, 5, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Javaheri, S.; Sicilian, L. Lung function, breathing pattern, and gas exchange in interstitial lung disease. Thorax 1992, 47, 93–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Agustí, A.G.N.; Roca, J.; Gea, J.; Wagner, P.D.; Xaubet, A.; Rodriguez-Roisin, R. Mechanisms of Gas-exchange Impairment in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 1991, 143, 219–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gläser, S.; Noga, O.; Koch, B.; Opitz, C.F.; Schmidt, B.; Temmesfeld, B.; Dörr, M.; Ewert, R.; Schäper, C. Impact of pulmonary hypertension on gas exchange and exercise capacity in patients with pulmonary fibrosis. Respir. Med. 2009, 103, 317–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chatila, W.; Nugent, T.; Vance, G.; Gaughan, J.; Criner, G.J. The Effects of High-Flow vs Low-Flow Oxygen on Exercise in Advanced Obstructive Airways Disease. Chest 2004, 126, 1108–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Peters, S.G.; Holets, S.R.; Gay, P.C. High-Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy in Do-Not-Intubate Patients With Hypoxemic Respiratory Distress. Respir. Care 2013, 58, 597–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Roca, O.; Pérez-Terán, P.; Masclans, J.R.; Pérez, L.; Galve, E.; Evangelista, A.; Rello, J. Patients with New York Heart Association class III heart failure may benefit with high flow nasal cannula supportive therapy: High flow nasal cannula in heart failure. J. Crit. Care 2013, 28, 741–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gupta, L.; Kerai, S.; Gupta, B.; Kakkar, K. Role of High-flow Nasal Oxygen Therapy in Cases with Pulmonary Hypertension in an Intensive Care Unit Setting. Indian J. Crit. Care Med. 2019, 23, 458–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Cammarota, G.; Simonte, R.; Longhini, F.; Spadaro, S.; Vetrugno, L.; De Robertis, E. Advanced Point-of-care Bedside Monitoring for Acute Respiratory Failure. Anesthesiology 2023, 138, 317–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Jcm 12 05472 g001
Figure 1. Study flow diagram. PH, pulmonary hypertension; HFNC, high-flow nasal cannula; COT, conventional oxygen therapy; and BMI, body mass index.
Figure 1. Study flow diagram. PH, pulmonary hypertension; HFNC, high-flow nasal cannula; COT, conventional oxygen therapy; and BMI, body mass index.
Jcm 12 05472 g001
Table 1. Baseline patient characteristics.
Table 1. Baseline patient characteristics.
HFNC
(n = 17) 		Control
(n = 17)		p
Age, years, mean, (SD)67.82 (7.74)71.06 (6.18)0.187
Male gender, n (%)12 (70.59)12 (70.59)>0.999
BMI, mean (SD), kg/m225.76 (4.19)25.06 (4.31)0.632
Smoking history, n (%)13 (76.47)11 (64.71)0.708
Pulmonary hypertension etiology
ILD, n (%)7 (41.18)7 (41.18)>0.999
OSAS, n (%)2 (11.76)2 (11.76)>0.999
COPD, n (%)6 (35.29)6 (35.29)>0.999
Chronic pulmonary embolism, n (%)2 (11.76)2 (11.76)>0.999
Depression, n (%)3 (17.65)4 (23.53)>0.999
Antibiotic therapy, n (%)14 (82.35)12 (70.59)0.688
Diuretic therapy, n (%)13 (76.47)13 (76.47)>0.999
Antifibrotic therapy, n (%)6 (35.29)6 (35.29)>0.999
Inhaled therapy, n (%)6 (35.29)7 (41.18)>0.999
LAMA, n (%)0 (0.00)1 (5.88)>0.999
LABA + LAMA, n (%)2 (11.76)1 (5.88)>0.999
ICS + LABA + LAMA, n (%)4 (23.53)5 (29.41)>0.999
Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; HFNC, high-flow nasal cannula; BMI, body mass index; ILD, interstitial lung disease; OSAS, obstructive sleep apnea syndrome; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; GERD, gastroesophageal reflux disease; LAMA, long-acting muscarinic receptor antagonist; LABA, long-acting β2-adrenergic agonist; and ICS, inhaled corticosteroid.
Table 2. Cardiac ultrasonography assessments in HFNC and COT cohorts.
Table 2. Cardiac ultrasonography assessments in HFNC and COT cohorts.
HFNCCOT
BaselineT10p-Value
Baseline vs. T10		BaselineT10p-Value
Baseline vs. T10
Right Heart
IVC (mm)24 [21; 27]21 [17; 23]0.01419 [19; 24]20 [19; 24]0.999
RAA (cm2)28.1 ± 9.923.3 ± 7.60.01128.5 ± 6.527.0 ± 6.60.742
TAPSE (mm)19.8 ± 3.421.5 ± 3.30.03620.0 ± 4.320.8 ± 4.20.265
IVST (cm)1.4 ± 0.21.3 ± 0.10.6851.3 ± 0.11.3 ± 0.10.999
RVOT (cm)3.6 ± 0.83.4 ± 0.70.4203.5 ± 0.73.5 ± 0.70.632
sPAP (mmHg)68 ± 2156 ± 210.00165 ± 1866 ± 160.700
TAPSE/sPAP (mm/mmHg)0.33 ± 0.140.45 ± 0.220.0010.32 ± 0.080.33 ± 0.080.219
Left heart
LAVI (mL/m2)36.5 [27.3; 45.8]35.5 [27.5; 36.0]0.12530.5 [26.3; 40.0]27.0 [23.3; 43.3]0.719
LVEF (%)55.9 ± 4.256.1 ± 2.30.81355.2 ± 6.254.6 ± 5.90.668
Aortic root (cm)3.6 ± 0.43.7 ± 0.40.45713.9 ± 0.53.9 ± 0.50.052
Abbreviations: IVC, inferior vena cava; RAA, right atrium area; TAPSE, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion; IVST, interventricular septal thickness; RVOT, right ventricular outflow tract; sPAP, systolic pulmonary arterial pressure; TAPSE/sPAP, ratio between TAPSE and sPAP; LAVI, left atrial volume index; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction. Data are expressed as mean ± SD or median [25th; 75th percentile]. p-values < 0.05 are considered significant.
Table 3. Treatment effects on cardiac ultrasonography assessments at T10.
Table 3. Treatment effects on cardiac ultrasonography assessments at T10.
HFNC vs. COT
p-ValueMean Difference [95% CI]
Right Heart
IVC (mm)0.043−3.46 [−6.80; −0.12]
RAA (cm2)0.033−3.52 [−6.74; −0.30]
TAPSE (mm)0.0452.00 [0.05; 3.95]
IVST (cm)0.822−0.02 [−0.15; 0.12]
RVOT (cm)0.857−0.04 [−0.5; 0.38]
sPAP (mmHg)0.002−13.05 [−20.64; −5.25]
TAPSE/sPAP (mm/mmHg)0.0300.11 [0.01; 0.20]
Left heart
LAVI (mL/m2)0.495−11.67 [−47.08; 23.75]
LVEF (%)0.8080.37 [−2.74; 3.48]
Aortic root (cm)0.067−0.35 [−1.23; 0.52]
Abbreviations: IVC, inferior vena cava; RAA, right atrium area; TAPSE, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion; IVST, interventricular septal thickness; RVOT, right ventricular outflow tract; sPAP, systolic pulmonary arterial pressure; TAPSE/sPAP, ratio between TAPSE and sPAP; LAVI, left atrial volume index; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction. p values < 0.05 are considered significant.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pelaia, C.; Armentaro, G.; Lupia, C.; Maiorano, A.; Montenegro, N.; Miceli, S.; Condoleo, V.; Cassano, V.; Bruni, A.; Garofalo, E.; et al. Effects of High-Flow Nasal Cannula on Right Heart Dysfunction in Patients with Acute-on-Chronic Respiratory Failure and Pulmonary Hypertension. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 5472. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12175472

AMA Style

Pelaia C, Armentaro G, Lupia C, Maiorano A, Montenegro N, Miceli S, Condoleo V, Cassano V, Bruni A, Garofalo E, et al. Effects of High-Flow Nasal Cannula on Right Heart Dysfunction in Patients with Acute-on-Chronic Respiratory Failure and Pulmonary Hypertension. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023; 12(17):5472. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12175472

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pelaia, Corrado, Giuseppe Armentaro, Chiara Lupia, Antonio Maiorano, Nicola Montenegro, Sofia Miceli, Valentino Condoleo, Velia Cassano, Andrea Bruni, Eugenio Garofalo, and et al. 2023. "Effects of High-Flow Nasal Cannula on Right Heart Dysfunction in Patients with Acute-on-Chronic Respiratory Failure and Pulmonary Hypertension" Journal of Clinical Medicine 12, no. 17: 5472. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12175472

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop