Next Article in Journal
Advances in Osteoporotic Bone Tissue Engineering
Next Article in Special Issue
Do-(Not-)Mechanical-Circulatory-Support Orders: Should We Ask All Cardiac Surgery Patients for Informed Consent for Post-Cardiotomy Extracorporeal Life Circulatory Support?
Previous Article in Journal
Topical TRPM8 Agonist for Relieving Neuropathic Ocular Pain in Patients with Dry Eye: A Pilot Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Concurrent Use of Renal Replacement Therapy during Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Article

Characteristics of Patients Managed without Positive Pressure Ventilation While on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

1
Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Surgery, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA
2
Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA
3
Division of Critical Care, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Co-first author.
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(2), 251; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10020251
Received: 15 December 2020 / Revised: 4 January 2021 / Accepted: 8 January 2021 / Published: 12 January 2021
Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has expanding indications for cardiopulmonary resuscitation including severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Despite the adjunct of ECMO for patients with severe ARDS, they often have prolonged mechanical ventilation and are subject to many of its inherent complications. Here, we describe patients who were cannulated for venovenous (VV) ECMO and were taken off positive pressure ventilation. Methods: This is a primary analysis of patients admitted at a tertiary medical center between the dates of August 2014 to January 2020 who were cannulated to ECMO for refractory respiratory failure. We included all patients ≥18 years old. Patients who were extubated or had a tracheostomy and taken off positive pressure while on ECMO were classified as “off positive pressure ventilation (PPV)” and were compared to patients who remained “on PPV” while on ECMO. Primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes were ventilator free days at 30 days and 60 days after ECMO cannulation, time from cannulation to date of first out-of-bed (OOB), and hospital length of stay (LOS). Patient characteristics were derived from routine clinical information in the electronic health record (EHR). Categorical characteristics were compared using chi-square test or Fisher exact test. Continuous characteristics were compared using independent samples t-test or Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test. p-values were reported from all analysis. Results: Sixty-five patients were included in this retrospective analysis. Forty-eight were managed on ECMO with PPV and 17 patients were removed from PPV. Patients removed from PPV had significantly higher lung injury scores prior to cannulation (2.5 ± 0.6 vs. 1.04 ± 0.3; p = 0.031) and non-significantly longer duration of ventilation prior to ECMO (6.1 days ± 2.1 vs. 5.0 days ± 01.1; p = 0.634). One hundred percent (100%) of patients removed from PPV survived to hospital discharge compared to 45% who received PPV throughout their duration of ECMO management (p < 0.001). The mean ventilator free days at day 60 was 15 with PPV and 36 without PPV (p = 0.003). The average duration from cannulation to mobilization (i.e., out-of-bed) was 18 days with PPV and 7 days without PPV (p = 0.015). Conclusions: Patients taken off PPV while on ECMO had a very high likelihood of survival to discharge and were mobilized in half as many days. While this likely reflects patient selection, the benefit of early mobilization is well documented and the approach of extubating while on ECMO warrants further investigation. View Full-Text
Keywords: extubation; ventilation; spontaneously breathing; ARDS; respiratory failure; ECMO extubation; ventilation; spontaneously breathing; ARDS; respiratory failure; ECMO
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Levin, N.M.; Ciullo, A.L.; Overton, S.; Mitchell, N.; Skidmore, C.R.; Tonna, J.E. Characteristics of Patients Managed without Positive Pressure Ventilation While on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 251. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10020251

AMA Style

Levin NM, Ciullo AL, Overton S, Mitchell N, Skidmore CR, Tonna JE. Characteristics of Patients Managed without Positive Pressure Ventilation While on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2021; 10(2):251. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10020251

Chicago/Turabian Style

Levin, Nicholas M., Anna L. Ciullo, Sean Overton, Nathan Mitchell, Chloe R. Skidmore, and Joseph E. Tonna. 2021. "Characteristics of Patients Managed without Positive Pressure Ventilation While on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome" Journal of Clinical Medicine 10, no. 2: 251. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10020251

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop