Next Article in Journal
Saffron: A Multitask Neuroprotective Agent for Retinal Degenerative Diseases
Next Article in Special Issue
Optimization of Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction of Phenolic Compounds from Black Locust (Robiniae Pseudoacaciae) Flowers and Comparison with Conventional Methods
Previous Article in Journal
Rationale on the High Radical Scavenging Capacity of Betalains
Previous Article in Special Issue
Optimization of Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction of Polyphenols from Myrtus communis L. Pericarp
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antioxidants
Volume 8
Issue 7
10.3390/antiox8070223
antioxidants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Nutraceutical Properties of Mulberries Grown in Southern Italy (Apulia)

by
Carmine Negro
*,
Alessio Aprile
,
Luigi De Bellis
and
Antonio Miceli
Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Technologies (DiSTeBA), Salento University, Via Prov. le Lecce-Monteroni, 73100 Lecce, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antioxidants 2019, 8(7), 223; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox8070223
Submission received: 11 June 2019 / Revised: 10 July 2019 / Accepted: 12 July 2019 / Published: 16 July 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antioxidant Activity of Polyphenolic Plant Extracts)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

In this work, for the first time, were analyzed mulberry genotypes grown in Apulia (Southern Italy, Salento region) were analyzed. Two local varieties of Morus alba (cv. Legittimo nero and cv. Nello) and one of Morus nigra were characterized for content in simple sugars, organic acids, phenols, anthocyanins; fruit antioxidant activity (AA) was also evaluated by three different methods (2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl, DPPH; 2,2′-Azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid), ABTS; and Ferric reducing antioxidant potential, FRAP test). The results showed that the sugars amount ranged between 6.29 and 7.66 g/100 g fresh weight (FW) while the malic and citric acids content was low, at about 0.1–1 g/100 g FW. Mulberries are a good source of phenols which are present in higher values in M. nigra and M. alba cv. Legittimo nero (485 and 424 mg Gallic Acid Equivalent (GAE)/ 100 g FW, respectively). The high performance liquid chromatography/diode array detector/mass spectrometry (HPLC/DAD/MS) analysis identified 5 main anthocyanin compounds present in different concentrations in each variety of mulberry: cyanidin 3-sophoroside, cyanidin 3-glucoside, cyanidin 3-rutinoside, pelargonidin 3-glucoside, pelargonidin 3-rutinoside. The highest concentration of anthocyanins was determined in Morus alba Legittimo (about 300 mg/100 g FW) while the lowest content (about 25 mg/100 g FW) was measured in M. alba cv. Nello. Morus nigra showed a good AA in comparison with the different M. alba genotypes with all the used methods; its AA was equal to 33, 26 and 21 μmols Trolox/g FW when using DPPH, ABTS and FRAP tests, respectively. All genotypes showed an anti-inflammatory activity (measured by cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitory assay) which was also compared with two commercial anti-inflammatory drugs. The data obtained support the high biological qualities of mulberry fruits and their diffusion in human nutrition.

1. Introduction

The mulberry is a dicotyledon plant belonging to the genus Morus of the Moraceae family and generally it is well known in sericulture and silk industry, since it is the only food plant for the domesticated silkworm Bombyx mori [1]. There are 24 species of Morus with at least 100 known varieties; it is widely distributed in Asia, Europe, North and South America, and Africa [2]. The most important species are Morus alba, with fruit colors ranging from white to dark red, and Morus nigra with dark red fruits mainly; both species have excellent productions in Mediterranean climate areas [3].
Almost all the parts of the mulberry-tree are used for their pharmacological actions. The leaves have been shown to have diuretic, hypoglycemic, and hypotensive activities [4,5], whereas the root bark has long been used for anti-inflammatory, antitussive, and antipyretic purposes [5]. Different studies underlined that these properties are due to hydroxylated alkaloids, flavonoids and Diels-Alder type adducts which seem to be responsible for a high α-glucosidase inhibition [6,7,8], improving the glucose levels in patients affected by type II diabetes [9,10].
Moreover, the mulberry fruit has numerous biologically active compounds like phenols, flavonoids, anthocyanins, carotenoids, essential fatty acids, ascorbic acid, and various organic acids [11,12], resulting in high antioxidant activities, especially in fully ripened fruits [10]. Mulberries can be consumed both fresh and processed such as syrup, jam, pulp, ice-cream, etc. Traditionally they are used as a warming agent, as a preparation against dysentery and as a tonic, sedative, laxative, odontalgic, anthelmintic, expectorant, and emetic. Moreover, a great deal of evidence suggests their potential role in the prevention of cancers, cardiovascular diseases, apoptosis, neurotoxicity and neurodegeneration [10,13] and oxidative stress. Several studies suggest that the reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) play important negative roles by oxidizing DNA and other molecules, leading to age-related diseases [14,15,16]. In particular the brain, which has a fundamental role in cognitive dysfunction usually associated with neuro-degenerative problems, is the most sensitive organ to the oxidative stress because of its high oxygen need, high metabolic rate and relative low antioxidative defense mechanisms [17,18,19]. In addition, recently, higher antinociceptive properties have been reported for black mulberry fruits, which inhibited the expression of inflammation-related proteins [20].
These biological activities are correlated to their polyphenol components, in particular anthocyanins, a large group of water-soluble pigments responsible for colors (orange, red and blue) of flowers, fruits and vegetables and principally known for the high antioxidant activity, anti-inflammatory potential and reduction of liver injury (chemo-and hepatic protective role) [21,22]. Cyanidin 3-O-glucoside (C3G), cyanidin 3-O-rutinoside (C3R), pelargonidin 3-O-glucoside (P3G), pelargonidin 3-O-rutinoside (P3R) are the main anthocyanins identified in mulberries and their antioxidant power is very high [21,23].
Mulberry grows in a wide range of climatic, topographical, and soil conditions which can affect the chemical composition and nutritional status of the fruits. Although mulberry fruits have been characterized in different parts of the world, information on fruits from plants grown in Southern Italy (Salento, South Apulia) has not been obtained. In the present study, therefore, fruits of local variety of Morus alba and Morus nigra have been characterized for their nutritional components by evaluating the content of simple sugars, organic acids, total phenolic compounds, o-diphenolic compounds, anthocyanins, and antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), 2,2′-Azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) diammonium salt (ABTS), Gallic acid, Folin-Ciocalteu reagent, Trolox (6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic acid), acetonitrile, acetone, methanol and water HPLC grade were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO) and they are of analytical grade. Cyanidin-3-O-Glucoside analytical grade was purchased from Extrasyntese (Genay, France), and anti-inflammatory Kit was purchased from Cayman Chemicals cat. Number 560131 (Ann Abor, MI, USA). Sugar kit and organic acids kit were purchased from R-Biopharm Italia Srl, cat. Numbers 10716260035, 10139076035, 10139068035 (Cerro al Lambro, Milano, Italy).

2.2. Extraction and Purification Juice

The analytical determinations were carried out on one local variety of Morus nigra and on two varieties of Morus alba known as Morus alba cv Legittimo nero and Morus alba cv Nello, which were harvested at full maturity in the Corigliano town fields (40°9′38”,16 N, 18°15′36”,72 E) (Province of Lecce) during June–July 2015 and stored at −20°C prior to the analysis.
Juice was obtained by centrifugation and used to quantify the sugars (sucrose, fructose and glucose) and citric and malic acid amounts by an enzymatic spectrophotometric kit provided by R-Biopharm Italia (see “Chemicals” paragraph 2.1) and expressing the results as g/100 g of fresh weight (FW) and, after filtration with Watmann n. 1, for determination of antioxidant activity. The moisture was determined in accordance to the AOAC method [24].
For the determination of phenolic compounds, a raw extract of each mulberry sample was obtained homogenizing 25 g of fresh plant material (3 min. at 10,000 rpm with Ultraturrax) using 100 mL of cold acetone 70% (v/v) acidified with 0.1% HCl. The homogenate was stirred for two hours in the dark at 4 °C, then centrifuged at 5000× g for 10 min. On the pellet, two further extractions were carried out in the same way. The supernatants were dried at reduced pressure and re-suspended with ultrapure water (HPLC grade) acidified with 0.1% HCl, thus obtaining a final volume of 100 mL (1:4 w/v).

2.3. Total Phenolics and Anthocyanins Determination

Total phenolics compounds (TPC) were measured by the Folin Ciocalteau spectrophotometric method using gallic acid as a standard and expressing the results as mg Gallic Acid Equivalent (GAE)/100 g FW [25]. Moreover, o-diphenolics compounds (ODC) were determined by the Arnow spectrophotometric method and expressing the results as mg chlorogenic acid/100 g FW [26].
In order to evaluate the anthocyanin amount using high performance liquid chromatography/diode array detector/mass spectrometry (HPLC/DAD/MS), the mulberry raw extracts were purified by solid phase extraction (SPE) using cartridge Strata X (Phenomenex Italia, Castel Maggiore, Bologna, Italy). After activation of the SPE cartridge with 2 mL pure methanol and 5 mL bi-distilled water, 20 mL raw extract were loaded and washed with 10 mL acidified bi-distilled water and 5 mL ethyl acetate to remove sugars and less polar flavons respectively; finally, 20 mL acid methanol were used to recover the anthocyanins. The purified extract was dried under vacuum and re-suspended with HPLC water acidified with 0.1 % HCl.
The identification was completed using an HPLC Agilent 1100 system (Agilent Tecnnologies, palo Alto, CA, USA) coupled with an Agilent DAD sensor (detection wavelength 520 nm) and Agilent ESI/MS spectrometer 6100 in positive ionization mode as reported by Negro et al. [27]. The separation was carried out at 30 °C with a gradient elution program at a flow rate of 0.8 mL/min using a Phenomenex Gemini C18 250 × 4.6 mm, 5 µm separation column. The mobile phases consisted of water plus 2% formic acid (A) and water:formic acid:acetonitrile 48:2:50 (B). The following multistep linear gradient was applied: 0 min, 6% B; 15 min, 30% B; 25 min, 50% B; 30 min, 60% B. The injection volume in the HPLC system was 20 μL. The quantification of anthocyanin was achieved using calibration curves of the authentic chemical standards cyanidin 3-glucoside (C3G) and moreover, total anthocyanins (TA) was determined as being the sum of the area of the single compounds.

2.4. Antioxidant Tests

The antioxidant activity tests were performed by spectrophotometric assays using three different methods: DPPH, ABTS and FRAP (Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power) test using a 96-well microplate according to Oki et al. [10], Re et al. [28] and Benzie and Strain [29], respectively. In all the assays, Trolox was used as a standard and results are expressed in terms of microgram of Trolox Equivalent Antioxidant Capacity (TEAC) per g of FW of sample.

2.5. Anti-Inflammatory Test

Anti-inflammatory activity (AI) was evaluated determining the cyclooxygenase activity (COX). The COX-1 and COX-2 inhibitory assay was carried out using COX Inhibitor Screening Assay Kit (Catalogue N° 560131, Cayman Chemicals, Ann Abor, MI, USA) according to the instructions provided by the manufacturer and as previously reported [27]. The AI was determined using the phenolic extract and results are expressed as inhibitory activity (IC50, µg/mL).

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Data are reported as the mean ± SD and three biological replicates are carried out for each sample. Statistical evaluation was conducted by ANOVA, followed by multicomponent Duncan’s test (p < 0.05) to discriminate among the mean values.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Simple Sugars, Organic Acids and Total Phenolics Content

The moisture and quantity of simple sugars, malic and citric acids, TPC and ODC were reported in Table 1. The moisture content in the fruits is very close, about 78%, according to the literature [1,11]. Sucrose was completely absent in all the samples analyzed; M. nigra had 7.66 g/100 g FW of sugars whereas the glucose and fructose contents were similar and equal to 3.94 and 3.72 g/100 g FW, respectively.
The fruits of other varieties showed a similar trend and although the glucose and fructose were equivalent, the total amount of sugars was lower corresponding to about 6 g/100 g FW. These values are in agreement as reported for the species of mulberry (M. nigra, M. alba and M. laevigata) cultivated in Pakistan [1], but they are notably inferior when compared to M. nigra, M. alba and M. rubra grown in Turkey for which the content of glucose and fructose was corresponding to about 6–7 g/100 g FW, respectively [30]. The organic acid content (malic and citric) was low and ranged between 0.13 and 1.02 g/100 g FW for M. alba cv Nello and M. nigra; M. nigra showed a greater quantity of citric acid of 0.92 g/100 g FW and this was in accordance with what was found in different varieties of Turkish mulberries where the amount of citric acid ranged between 0.39 and 1.08 g/100 g FW [30].
The differences between species in terms of citric and malic acid content might be caused by genetic factors as well as agronomic practices and ecological factors (temperature, soil conditions, humidity, ect.). In fact, Koyuncu [31] reported a variable amount of citric and malic acid that ranged between 0.5 to 2.3 g/100 g FW and 3.5 to 19.8 g/100 g FW for different genotypes of mulberry fruits cultivated in Turkey. These differences are also evident in fruits grown in different localities of the same country; Koyuncu [31] reported different amounts in citric and malic acid for black mulberry fruits from two locations ranged between 0.8 to 1.3 g/100 g FW and 5.7 to 9.9 g/100 g FW, respectively. In other Turkish mulberry genotypes, the content of malic and citric acid was very different, varying from 12.9 to 21.8 g/100 g FW and from 2.1 to 4.1 g/100 g FW, respectively [11].
Organic acids are water soluble and together with the sugars contribute to the taste of vegetables and fruits. The ratio of the total acid amount to the content of sugars in fruits is a criterion for the maturity; moreover, organic acids have a high impact on taste because of their conditioning (a reduction) on sweetness and their favoring effect on sourness. In addition, the type and the amount of acidity could be used for food decay; if the fruit is molded during the wait, there is an increment of some organic acids which seems also to have a significant impact on the purity control [30].
The amount of TPC and ODC, evaluated as mg of gallic acid equivalent (GAE) and mg of chlorogenic acid, respectively, is also reported in Table 1. The data showed that in M. nigra and M. alba Legittimo the content of TPC was equal to about 485 and 423 mg GAE/100 g FW, respectively and corresponding to more than three times the TPC present in M. alba cv Nello. M. nigra showed an ODC content of 102.21 mg/100 g FW, an amount about 1.8 and 4 times higher than that present in M. alba cv Legittimo nero and M. alba cv. Nello, respectively.
Mulberry fruits are a good source of phenolic compounds and the results clearly showed that fruit analyzed had high total phenolic content, nevertheless they showed wide differences in comparison to the literature data. In fact, TPC in mulberry fruits was reported which ranged from 104.8 to 213.5 GAE mg/100 g FW for eight Thai genotypes [32], from 158.4 to 249 mg/GAE 100 g FW and from 100.5 to 348.8 mg GAE/100 g FW, respectively for mulberries harvested in different Turkish sites [33,34], and from 76.7 to 180 mg GAE/100 g FW in fruits grown in Spain [35]. However, data reported by Imran et al. [1] and by Ercisli et al. [12] showed that the TPC content in fruits collected in the northern region of Pakistan and in North-East Anatolia (Turkey) was very high, ranging from 880 to 1650 and from 1943 to 2237 mg GAE/100 g FW, respectively. This great variability in the content of total phenols is related to the genotype, the conditions of growth and cultivation [22] and could be influenced by fruit moisture, too. It is known, in fact, that the plant can accumulate phenolic compounds under various stress conditions (heat, UV light, pathogen attack, etc.); in particular, climatic changes like low or high-temperature stress can promote the production of the phenolic compounds [36,37,38].

3.2. Anthocyanins Analysis

Figure 1 reports a typical HPLC/DAD/MS separation of the anthocyanins present in mulberry fruits. Five components were identified on the basis of the UV and MS spectra and retention time, corresponding to cyanidin-3-O-sophoroside (C3S, m/z 611, peak 1), cyanidin-3-O-glucoside (C3G, m/z 449, peak 2), cyanidin-3-O-rutinoside (C3R, m/z 595, peak 3), pelargonidin-3-O-glucoside (P3G, m/z 433, peak 4) and pelargonidin-3-O-rutinoside (P3R, m/z 579, peak 5). Our results are in agreement with the data reported some years ago by Dugo et al. [39] that identified a mixture of five different anthocyanidin glycosides in Italian mulberries cultivars but are discordant with Pawloska et al. [13], which revealed four anthocyanins in M. nigra fruits harvested in Benevento (South Italy).
The anthocyanins identified and the total anthocyanin content (TA), calculated as the sum of the single compounds, were shown in Table 2. The TA in M. alba Nello was 24.7 mg/100 g FW, was about 8 and 12 times lower than that determined in M. nigra and M. alba Legittimo nero, corresponding to 206 and 289 mg/100 g FW, respectively. According to earlier reports, TA content was 2–30, 0.3–83, 1.5–615 mg/100 g FW respectively for genotypes grown in Turkey, Korea and India [34,40,41]. C3G and C3R are the anthocyanins most represented with amounts ranging from 18.2 to 212 and from 5.2 to 71.8 mg/100 g FW, respectively. P3G ranged from 1.6% to 5% of the TA content while C3S was sligtly higher in M. nigra, representing about 1.5% of the TA in comparison to 0.17% and 0.56% for the other genotypes.

3.3. Antioxidant Activity

Table 3 reports the mulberry AA measured by three different tests. Data indicate clearly that M. nigra showed the highest antioxidant activity corresponding to about 33, 26 and 21 μmol Trolox/g FW, respectively by the DPPH, ABTS and FRAP tests.
In the DPPH scavenging activity test, all the mulberry genotypes showed an AA significantly higher than ABTS and FRAP test. In fact, M. alba Legittimo nero exhibited an antioxidant capacity that was about two times greater than that measured with the other methods and M. alba Nello showed a capacity that was about 10 times lower when assessed by the FRAP test.
These data could be the result of a different qualitative and quantitative composition of phenolic compounds of the three mulberries. Further studies are needed to prove this. Moreover, we cannot exclude the possibility that the quenching mechanisms of the different compounds are more efficient against DPPH• than ABTS•+.
However, the observed antioxidant activity is probably due to the set of phenolic compounds present in the juice; in addition to the anthocyanin effect, it is known that there are significant quantities of other phenolic compounds such as gallic and cinnamic acid, procyanidin B1, catechin and quercetin [32].
Moreover, these results are in agreement with the literature data, in particular with the work of Ercisli et al. [33] that reports for M. nigra and M. rubra an AA ranging between 16 and 21.2 μmol Trolox/g FW and between 9.2 and 12.1 μmol Trolox/g FW when it was estimated by DPPH; instead, the range was between 12.3 to 14.1 μmol Trolox/g FW and from 4.9 to 8.1 μmol Trolox/g FW, respectively for M. nigra and M. rubra when measured by the FRAP test [33]. Also, the radical scavenging activity measured using ABTS system was in agreement with the values reported for different mulberry genotypes (black and/or red mulberries) grown in various Turkish regions, ranging from 6.8 to 14.4 μmol Trolox/g FW and from 5.1 to 7.3 μmol Trolox/g FW, respectively, in M. nigra and M. rubra [34].

3.4. Anti-Inflammatory Activity (AI)

The anti-inflammatory activity is related to the ability of some compounds to inhibit the two isoforms of the cyclooxygenase enzyme, COX-1 and COX-2; this activity was demonstrated for the anthocyanins isolated from raspberries and sweet cherries (cyanidin-3-glucosyl-rutinoside and cyanidin-3-rutinoside [42] and also for the anthocyanidins as cyanidin and malvidin [43].
The results of the AI in vitro assay are reported in Table 4; data indicate for all the extracts a relevant biological activity. The IC50 values relative to COX-1 ranged between 125 and 185 µg/mL TA and from 64 and 97 µg/mL TA relative to COX-2 for M. nigra and M. alba Nello genotypes, respectively. Employing identical analysis conditions, the AI of ibuprofen and nimesulide (positive controls, two synthetic anti-inflammatories compounds), were equal to 6 and 5 µg/mL, respectively, for COX-1 assay, and to 5 and 2 µg/mL for COX-2 assay. To our knowledge, it is the first time that mulberry extracts AI was determined in vitro using the ELISA methodology. Several authors have evaluated pure anthocyanins or different fruit extracts (such as cherry, blueberry, blackberry, etc) employing different assay methods showing that among aglycones, cyanidin was particularly active in the COX-2 assay [39]. Comparing IC50 values for different fruits from literature data, for pomegranate values were reported relative to COX-1 between 249 and 145 µg/mL and from 175 and 75 relative to COX-2, respectively for different genotypes grown in Salento area (Southern Apulia) [27]; the cherries showed values up to 130 µg/mL whereas blueberries, which are known to have high AI, had a range of 400–800 µg/mL depending to the ecotypes [42].

4. Conclusions

To our knowledge, this is the first time that mulberry genotypes growing in the Salento area have been characterized, particularly in terms of phenols, anthocyanin analysis and biological properties. The biochemical analysis of different mulberry genotypes confirmed that this fruit is rich in biologically active substances such as total phenols, o-diphenols, and anthocyanins, which are also responsible for strong antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. Considering the high concentration of total phenols, particularly anthocyanins, and the free anti-scavenging properties, this “minor” fruit can be considered an excellent source of antioxidant compounds and M. nigra and M. alba Legittimo nero seem to be the most interesting genotypes. Moreover, in relation to the sugars and organic acid contents, it is important to observe that their contents positively influence consumer opinions.
Mulberry should be classified as a “functional food” and its use as fruit, juice, jams, or as a muesli component may be recommended in human nutrition because of its biological qualities. In fact, the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of the mulberry suggest that its diffusion and consumption would be beneficial to human health; hopefully, this fruit, if included in a regular diet, might be able to alleviate and/or control different pathologies.
Moreover, the mulberry may represent a good plant species for more extensive re-implantation in marginal zones and/or degraded lands. Its cultivation in a territory such as the Salento, a site strongly suffering from a devastating Xylella fastidiosa infection, might give a positive boost to agriculture and, at the same time, protect the environment from further degradation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.N. and A.M.; methodology C.N. and A.M.; formal analysis, C.N.; investigation, C.N. and A.M.; resources, A.M.; data curation, C.N., A.A.; writing—original draft preparation, A.M.; writing—review and editing, A.M., A.A.; supervision, L.D.B.; project administration, A.M. and L.D.B.; funding acquisition, A.M. and L.D.B.

Funding

This research reived no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authours declare no conflit of interest.

References

  1. Imran, M.; Khan, H.; Shah, M.; Khan, R.; Khan, F. Chemical composition of certain Morus species. J. Zhejiang Univ.Sci. B (Biomed. Biotechnol.) 2010, 11, 973–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Thabti, I.; Elfalleh, W.; Hannachi, H.; Ferchichi, A.; Da Graça Campos, M. Identification and quantification of phenolic acids and flavonol glycosides in Tunisian Morus species by HPLC-DAD and HPLC-MS. J. Funct. Foods 2012, 4, 367–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gerasopouls, D.; Stravroulakis, G. Quality characteristics of four mulberry (Morus sp) cultivars in the area of Chania, Greece. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1997, 73, 261–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kelkar, S.M.; Bapat, V.A.; Ganapathi, T.R.; Kalig, G.S.; Rao, P.S.; Heble, M.R. Determination of hypoglycemic activity in Morus indica L. (mulberry) shoot cultures. Curr. Sci. 1996, 71, 71–72. [Google Scholar]
  5. Asano, N.; Yamashita, T.; Ikeda, K.; Kizu, H.; Kameda, Y.; Kato, A.; Nash, R.J.; Lee, H.; Ryu, K.S. Polyhydroxylated alkaloids isolated from mulberry trees (Morus alba L.) and silkworms (Bombyx mori L.). J. Sci. Food Agric. 2001, 49, 4208–4213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Asano, N.; Oseky, K.; Tomioka, E.; Kizu, H.; Matsui, K. N-containing sugars from Morus alba and their glycosidase inhibitory activities. Carbohydr. Res. 1994, 259, 243–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Du, J.; He, Z.D.; Jiang, R.W.; Ye, W.C.; Xu, H.X.; But, P.P.H. Antiviral flavonoids from the root bark of Morus alba L. Phytochemistry 2003, 62, 1235–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Daj, S.J.; Ma, Z.B.; Wu, Y.; Yu, D.Q. Guangsangons F-J, anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory Diels-Alder type adducts, from Morus macroura Miq. Phytochemistry 2004, 65, 3135–3141. [Google Scholar]
  9. Andallu, B.; Suryakantham, V.; Srikanthi, B.L.; Reddy, G.K. Effect of mulberry (Morus indica L.) therpy on plasma and erythrocyte membrane lipids in patients with type 2 diabetes. Clin. Chim. Acta 2001, 314, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Oki, T.; Kobayashi, M.; Nakamura, T.; Okuyama, A.; Masuda, M.; Shiratusuchi, H.; Suda, I. Changes in radical-scavenging activity and components of mulberry fruit during maturation. J. Food Sci. 2006, 71, C18–C22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ercisli, S.; Orhan, E. Chemical composition of white (Morus alba), red (Morus rubra) and black (Morus nigra) fruits. Food Chem. 2007, 103, 1380–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ercisli, S.; Orhan, E. Some physico-chemical characteristics of black mulberry (Morus nigra L.) genotypes from Northeast Anatolia region of Turkey. Sci. Hortic. 2008, 116, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Pawloska, A.M.; Oleszek, W.; Braca, A. Quali-quantitative analyses of flavonoids of Morus nigra L and Morus alba L. fruits. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 3377–3380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Calabrese, V.; Cornelius, C.; Stella, A.M.; Calabrese, S.J. Cellular stress responses, mitostress and carnitine insufficiencies as critical determinants in aging and neurodegenative disordes: role of hormosis and vitagenes. Neurochem. Res. 2010, 35, 1880–1915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Obrenovich, M.E.; Li, Y.; Parvathaneni, K.; Yendluri, B.B.; palacios, H.H.; Leszek, J.; Aliev, G. Antioxidants in healths, disease and aging. CNS Neurol. Disord. Drug Targest 2011, 10, 192–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Fransen, M.; Norgren, M.; Wang, B.; Apanasets, O.; Van Veldhoven, P.P. Aging, age-related diseases and peroxisomes. Subcell. Biochem. 2013, 69, 45–65. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  17. Hélie, S.; Paul, E.J.; Ashby, F.G. A neurocomputational account of cognitive deficits in Parkinson’s disease. Neuropsychologia 2011, 50, 2290–2302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  18. O’Neill, C. PI3-kinase/Akt/mTOR signaling: impaired on/off switches in aging, cognitive decline and Alzheimer’s disease. Exp. Gerontol. 2013, 48, 647–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Turgut, N.H.; Mert, D.G.; Kara, H.; Egilmez, H.R.; Arslanbas, E.; Tepe, B.; Gungor, H.; Yilmaz, N.; Tuncel, N.B. Effect of black mulberry (Morus nigra) extract treatment on cognitive impairment and oxidative stress status of D-galactosee-induced aging mice. Pharm. Biol. 2016, 54, 1052–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, H.; Yu, W.; Chen, G.; Meng, S.; Xiang, Z.; He, N. Antinociceptive and antibacterial properties of anthocyanins and flavonols from fruits of black and non-black mulberries. Molecules 2018, 23, 1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, X.; Xiao, G.; Chen, W.; Xu, Y.; Wu, J. Quantification and purification of mulberry anthocyanins with macroporus resins. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2004, 5, 326–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Sývacý, A.; Sökmen, M. Seasonal changes in antioxidant activity, total phenolic and anthocyanin constituent of the steams of two Morus species (Morus alba L. and Morus nigra L.). Plant Growth Regul. 2004, 44, 251–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Du, Q.; Zheng, J.; Xu, Y. Composition of anthocyanins in mulberry and their antioxidant activity. J. Food Comp. Anal. 2008, 21, 390–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 15th ed.; Association of Official Analytical Chemist: Washington DC, USA, 1990.
  25. Singleton, V.L.; Orthofer, R. Analysis of Total Phenols and Other Oxidation Substrates and Antioxidants by Means of Folin-Ciocalteu Reagent. Methods Enzymol. 1999, 299, 152–178. [Google Scholar]
  26. Bendini, A.; Bonoli, M.; Cerretani, L.; Biguzzi, B.; Lercker, G.; Gallina Toschi, T. Liquid–liquid and solid-phase extractions of phenols from virgin olive oil and their separation by chromatographic and electrophoretic methods. J. Chrom. A 2003, 985, 425–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Negro, C.; Longo, L.; Vasapollo, G.; De Bellis, L.; Miceli, A. Biochemical, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties of promegranate fruits growing in Southern Italy (Salento, Apulia). Acta Aliment. 2012, 41, 190–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Re, R.; Pellegrini, N.; Proteggente, A.; Pannala, A.; Yang, M.; Rice-Evans, C.A. Antioxidant activity applyng an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay. Free Radic. Bio. Med. 1999, 26, 1231–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Benzie, I.F.F.; Strain, J.J. The ferric reducing ability of plasma as measure of “antioxidant power”: The FRAP assay. Anal. Biochem. 1996, 239, 70–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gundogdu, M.; Muradoglu, F.; Gazioglu Sensoy, R.I.; Ylmaz, H. Determination of fruit chemical properties of Morus nigra L., Morus alba L. and Morus rubra L. by HPLC. Sci. Hortic. 2011, 132, 37–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Koyuncu, F. Organic acid composition of native black mulberry fruit. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2004, 40, 367–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Butkhup, L.; Samappito, W.; Samappito, S. Phenolic composition and antioxidant activity of whyte mulberry (Morus alba L.) fruits. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 48, 934–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ercisli, S.; Tosun, M.; Duralija, B.; Voca, S.; Sengul, M.; Turan, M. Phytochemical content of some black (Morus nigra L.) and purple (Morus rubra L.) mulberry genotypes. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2010, 48, 102–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Özgen, M.; Serçe, S.; Kaya, C. Phytochemical and antioxidant properties of anthocyanin-rich Morus nigra and Morus rubra fruits. Sci. Hortic. 2009, 119, 275–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Calin-Sanchez, A.; Martinez-Nicolas, J.J.; Munera-Picazo, S.; Carbonell-Barrachina, A.A.; Legua, P.; Hernandez, F. Bioactive compounds and sensory quality of black and white mulberries grown in Spain. Plant Food Hum. Nutr. 2013, 68, 370–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Nozolino, C.; Isabelle, P.; Das, G. Seasonal changes in phenolics constituents of jack pine seedling (Pinus banksiana) in relation to the purpling phenomenon. Can. J. Bot. 1990, 68, 2010–2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Christie, P.J.; Alfenito, M.R.; Walbot, V. Impact of low-temperature stress on general phenylpropanoid and anthocyanin pathways: enhancement of transcript abundance and anthocyanins pigmentation in maize seedlings. Planta 1994, 194, 541–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Dixon, R.A.; Paiva, N.L. Stress-induced phenylpropanoid metabolism. Plant Cell 1995, 7, 1085–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Dugo, P.; Mondello, L.; Errante, G.; Zappia, G.; Dugo, G. Identification of anthocyaninsin berries by narrow-bore high-performance liquid chromatography with electrospray ionization detection. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001, 49, 3897–3992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bae, S.H.; Suh, H.J. Antioxidant activities of five different mulberry cultivars in Korea. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2007, 40, 955–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Shivashankara, K.S.; Jalikop, S.H.; Roy, T.K. Species variability for fruit antioxidant and radical scavenging ability in mulberry. Int. J. Fruit Sci. 2010, 10, 355–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Seeram, N.P.; Momin, R.A.; Nair, M.G.; Bourquin, L.D. Cyclooxygenase inhibitory and antioxidant cyaniding glycosides in cherry and berries. Phytomedicine 2001, 8, 362–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Seeram, N.P.; Zhang, Y.; Nair, M.G. Inhibition of proliferation of human cancer cell and cyclooxygenase enzymes by anthocyanidins and catechins. Nutr. Cancer 2003, 46, 101–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Antioxidants 08 00223 g001
Figure 1. Typical HPLC/DAD/MS analysis (recorded at 520 nm) of the anthocyanins present in mulberry fruit extracts (M. nigra). (1) cyanidin-3-O-sophoroside, (2) cyanidin-3-O-glucoside, (3) cyanidin-3-O-rutinoside, (4) pelargonidin -3-O-glucoside and (5) pelargonidin -3-O-rutinoside.
Figure 1. Typical HPLC/DAD/MS analysis (recorded at 520 nm) of the anthocyanins present in mulberry fruit extracts (M. nigra). (1) cyanidin-3-O-sophoroside, (2) cyanidin-3-O-glucoside, (3) cyanidin-3-O-rutinoside, (4) pelargonidin -3-O-glucoside and (5) pelargonidin -3-O-rutinoside.
Antioxidants 08 00223 g001
Table 1. Amounts of moisture (%), glucose, fructose, malic and citric acid (expressed as g/100 g FW), total phenolic compounds (TPC) (mg Gallic Acid Equivalent (GAE)/100 g FW) and o-diphenolic compounds (ODC) (mg of chlorogenic acid /100 g FW) in different mulberry fruit varieties. Values represent the results of three determinations ± SD; means with different letters in the same column are significantly different from each other (p < 0.05) according to the multicomponent Duncan’s test.
Table 1. Amounts of moisture (%), glucose, fructose, malic and citric acid (expressed as g/100 g FW), total phenolic compounds (TPC) (mg Gallic Acid Equivalent (GAE)/100 g FW) and o-diphenolic compounds (ODC) (mg of chlorogenic acid /100 g FW) in different mulberry fruit varieties. Values represent the results of three determinations ± SD; means with different letters in the same column are significantly different from each other (p < 0.05) according to the multicomponent Duncan’s test.
GenotypeMoistureGlucoseFructoseMalic AcidCitric AcidTPCODC
M. nigra78.2 ± 1.1 a3.9 ± 0.1 a3.7 ± 0.1 a0.1 ± 0.1 a0.9 ± 0.1 a485.5 ± 7.1 a101.2 ± 6.2 a
M. alba Legittimo nero77.7 ± 1.3 a3.3 ± 0.1 a3.0 ± 0.1 b0.1 ± 0.1 a0.2 ± 0.1 b423.6 ± 4.2 b60.4 ± 3.1 b
M. alba Nello77.6 ± 1.2 a3.2 ± 0.1 a3.2 ± 0.1 b0.1 ± 0.1 a0.1 ± 0.1 b141.2 ± 6.1 c26.2 ± 2.1 c
Table 2. Amounts of cyanidin-3-O-sophoroside (C3S), cyanidin-3-O-glucoside (C3G), cyanidin-3-O-rutinoside (C3R), pelargonidin-3-O-glucoside (P3G) and pelargonidin-3-O-rutinoside (P3R) and Total anthocyanins (TA) in mulberry fruits. Values are expressed as C3G mg/100 g FW and represent the results of three determinations ± SD. Means with different letters in the same column are significantly different from each other (p < 0.05) according to the multicomponent Duncan’s test.
Table 2. Amounts of cyanidin-3-O-sophoroside (C3S), cyanidin-3-O-glucoside (C3G), cyanidin-3-O-rutinoside (C3R), pelargonidin-3-O-glucoside (P3G) and pelargonidin-3-O-rutinoside (P3R) and Total anthocyanins (TA) in mulberry fruits. Values are expressed as C3G mg/100 g FW and represent the results of three determinations ± SD. Means with different letters in the same column are significantly different from each other (p < 0.05) according to the multicomponent Duncan’s test.
GenotypeC3SC3GC3RP3GP3RTA
M. nigra3.1 ± 0.3 a138.6 ± 1.5 b52.3 ± 2.1 b10.4 ± 1.1 a1.7 ± 0.1 a206.1 ± 1.8 b
M. alba Legittimo nero0.5 ± 0.1 b212.2 ± 1.1 a71.8 ± 0.3 a4.7 ± 0.2 b0.1 ± 0.1 c289.2 ± 0.9 a
M. alba Nello0.1 ± 0.1 c18.2 ± 0.4 c5.2 ± 0.2 c1.0 ± 0.1 c0.2 ± 0.1 b24.7 ± 0.3 c
Table 3. Antioxidant activity of different mulberry genotypes evaluated by DPPH, ABTS and FRAP test. Results are expressed as μmol Trolox Equivalents/g FW. Values represent the results of three determinations ± SD; means with different letters in the same column are significantly different from each other (p < 0.05) according to the multicomponent Duncan’s test.
Table 3. Antioxidant activity of different mulberry genotypes evaluated by DPPH, ABTS and FRAP test. Results are expressed as μmol Trolox Equivalents/g FW. Values represent the results of three determinations ± SD; means with different letters in the same column are significantly different from each other (p < 0.05) according to the multicomponent Duncan’s test.
GenotypeDPPH TestABTS TestFRAP Test
M. nigra32.9 ± 0.7 a26.1 ± 1.5 a21.3 ± 1.1 a
M. alba Legittimo nero22.7 ± 1.4 b11.6 ± 2.3 b10.6 ± 1.5 b
M. alba Nello18.5 ± 2.3 c7.3 ± 2.1 b1.7 ± 0.9 c
Table 4. Anti-inflammatory activity (AI) of mulberry genotypes measured as COX-1 and COX-2 inhibitory activity expressed as IC50, µg/mL extract. Values represent the results of three determinations ± SD; means with different letters in the same column are significantly different from each other (p < 0.05) according to the multicomponent Duncan’s test.
Table 4. Anti-inflammatory activity (AI) of mulberry genotypes measured as COX-1 and COX-2 inhibitory activity expressed as IC50, µg/mL extract. Values represent the results of three determinations ± SD; means with different letters in the same column are significantly different from each other (p < 0.05) according to the multicomponent Duncan’s test.
Genotype/ComponentAI (IC50, µg/mL)
COX1COX2
M. nigra125 ± 5 b64 ± 7 b
M. alba Legittimo nero140 ± 7 c81 ± 8 c
M. alba Nello185 ± 9 d97 ± 5 c
Nimesulide5 ± 1 a2 ± 1 a
Ibuprofen6 ± 1 a5 ± 1 a

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Negro, C.; Aprile, A.; De Bellis, L.; Miceli, A. Nutraceutical Properties of Mulberries Grown in Southern Italy (Apulia). Antioxidants 2019, 8, 223. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox8070223

AMA Style

Negro C, Aprile A, De Bellis L, Miceli A. Nutraceutical Properties of Mulberries Grown in Southern Italy (Apulia). Antioxidants. 2019; 8(7):223. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox8070223

Chicago/Turabian Style

Negro, Carmine, Alessio Aprile, Luigi De Bellis, and Antonio Miceli. 2019. "Nutraceutical Properties of Mulberries Grown in Southern Italy (Apulia)" Antioxidants 8, no. 7: 223. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox8070223

APA Style

Negro, C., Aprile, A., De Bellis, L., & Miceli, A. (2019). Nutraceutical Properties of Mulberries Grown in Southern Italy (Apulia). Antioxidants, 8(7), 223. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox8070223

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop