You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Antioxidants
  • Review
  • Open Access

17 December 2025

Protective Functions of β-Alanyl-L-Histidine and Glycyl-L-Histidyl-L-Lysine Glycoconjugates and Copper in Concert

and
1
Institute of Crystallography, National Council of Research, CNR-IC, Via P. Gaifami, 18-95126 Catania, Italy
2
Department of Chemical Sciences, University of Catania, V.le A. Doria, 6-95125 Catania, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article belongs to the Special Issue Oxidative Stress and Its Mitigation in Neurodegenerative Disorders

Abstract

Two endogenous peptides, β-alanyl-L-histidine, named carnosine (Car), and glycyl-L-histidyl-L-lysine (GHK), derived from the matricellular protein Secreted Protein Acidic and Rich in Cysteine (SPARC), share many beneficial functions. The hydrolytic enzyme carnosinase for Car and the low stability for GHK can put into question their antioxidant, antiaggregating, and anti-inflammatory properties. The glycoconjugates of Car with a di- (trehalose, Tre) or polysaccharide (hyaluronan, HA) inhibit carnosinase, while the synthesis of HAGHK derivatives increases the tripeptide stability and protects/delays the biopolymer degradation. A synergic effect between the two components of the glycoconjugates is evident in their consequently preserved protective features. TreCar, HACar, and HAGHK maintain the copper-binding ability of the peptides alone, and the saccharides potentiate the Cu,Zn-superoxide dismutase-like ability of the copper(II) complexes with the glycoconjugates. These peptide derivatives behave as copper ionophores, utilizing Cu2+ present in the culture medium; also, an increase in the metal intracellular level occurs with a consequent stimulation of the copper-driven signaling pathways that produce the expression/release of trophic (Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor, BDNF, and Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2, BMP-2) and angiogenic (Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor, VEGF) proteins. Copper chaperons for SOD1, CCS, and Antioxidant 1 (Atox-1) are the copper chaperones that act as transcription factors.

1. Introduction

Cellular homeostasis needs redox homeostasis that requires a balance between the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the endogenous antioxidant system [1], with ROS being also involved in physiologic signal transduction and cell protection [2].
Mitochondrial and non-mitochondrial ROS-generating enzymes, including nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase (Nox), xanthine oxidase (XO), cytochrome P450 from endoplasmic reticulum (ER), and flavin oxidases from peroxisomes, are responsible for endogenous production of ROS [3,4]. The mitochondrial respiratory chain and Nox systems are the main players.
Two types of ROS are produced, which include both radical species, such as superoxide anion (O2 ·−) and hydroxyl radical (·OH), and non-radical species, such as hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). High-reactive molecules such as hydroxyl radicals and peroxynitrites are generated when H2O2 undergoes Fenton and Haber–Weiss reactions (Scheme 1) [5]. When H2O2 and Fe(II)/Cu(I) are the only reactants, the first reaction is just the first step of a complex process. (Figure 1)
Scheme 1. Fenton and Haber–Weiss reaction.
Figure 1. Main reactions for generating, consuming, and interconverting ROS.
Superoxide (O2.) is generated from O2 as a by-product of the respiratory chain complex from the mitochondrial electron transport chain (ETC) or by NADPH oxidase. The superoxide radical is then dismutated into H2O2 by the enzyme superoxide dismutases (SODs), including cytosolic Cu,Zn-SOD (SOD1) and mitochondrial Mn-SOD (SOD2) [6] and the extracellular isoform, SOD3 [7]. Moreover, catalase (CAT), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), and peroxiredoxins (PRX) [8] detoxify hydrogen peroxide. In addition to enzymes committed to ensuring redox homeostasis [9,10], cells also have an extensive array of non-enzymatic antioxidants, which act as an additional layer of defense. Some examples include glutathione, vitamin C (ascorbic acid), and vitamin E (α-tocopherol) [11].
ROS directly interacts with critical signaling molecules, stimulating diverse cellular processes such as proliferation and survival (mitogen-activated protein kinases, MAP kinases [12,13]; phosphoinositide 3-kinase, PI3 kinase [14,15]; PTEN [16,17]; and protein tyrosine phosphatases [18]), ROS homeostasis and antioxidant gene regulation (thioredoxin [19]; peroxiredoxin [20]; Redox factor-1, Ref-1 [21]; and nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2, Nrf-2 [22,23]), and mitochondrial oxidative stress, apoptosis, and aging (the Shc adaptor protein family component, p66Shc [24]; and Ataxia–telangiectasia mutated, ATM [25]).
However, the unbalance of redox homeostasis leads to oxidative damage and cellular dys-homeostasis, associated with various pathological processes, including: (i) neurodegenerative pathologies [26], by accelerating neuron function alteration and neuronal apoptosis [27]; (ii) cardiovascular diseases progression by favoring endothelial illness [28]; (iii) cancer evolution by activating different signaling pathways [29,30]; and (iv) immune system worsening [31].
The brain with its numerous and incurable diseases (Alzheimer’s diseases, Parkinson’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis pathology, etc.) is highly vulnerable to oxidative stress due to: (i) high oxygen consumption; (ii) significant levels of redox-active metals, such as iron or copper, which can catalyze ROS formation; (iii) high levels of polyunsaturated fatty acids in its cell membranes, which can act as substrates for lipid peroxidation [32]; and, (iv) relatively low levels of GSH, which can play a limited role as an endogenous antioxidant to scavenge ROS [33].
In recent years, advances in redox biology have revealed potential therapeutic targets and strategies for modulating oxidative stress (OS) [4], such as the use of antioxidants, ROS scavengers, and signaling pathway inhibitors, some of which are undergoing clinical evaluation [34,35,36].
Current antioxidants applied in clinics for therapeutic applications are mainly molecular antioxidants, including N-acetylcysteine, edaravone, coenzyme Q10, vitamin C, etc. [37,38,39,40,41]. However, from a perspective of chemical reaction, these molecular antioxidants can only act as reactants to interact with ROS; thus, after the redox reaction, these antioxidants are inactivated, leading to a non-sustainable antioxidative effect, largely compromising therapeutic outcome [42].
Among the increasing number of peptide-based potential drug therapies that were proposed, peptides comprising 2–4 amino acid residues are defined as ultrashort peptides [43]. β-alanyl-L-histidine, named carnosine (Car), and glycyl-l-histidyl-l-lysine (GHK) are endogenous peptides that belong to this class of peptides, holding several important beneficial properties, including antioxidant, antiglycating, anti-inflammatory, and neuroprotective capacities [44,45,46,47].

2. Endogenous Histidine-Containing Peptides

2.1. β-Alanyl-L-Histidine, Carnosine

Carnosine (β-alanyl-L-histidine, Car) (Figure 2) represents the archetype of a larger family of other subsequently isolated carnosine-related dipeptides [48], as anserine (β-alanyl-3-methyl-histidine, Ans) and homocarnosine (γ-aminobutyryl-L-histidine, HCar), which are the three most representative histidine dipeptides [49,50,51], widely present in mammal tissues [52].
Figure 2. Chemical structure of carnosine.
The dipeptide carnosine is synthesized from its components, histidine and β-alanine, by carnosine synthetase (EC 6.3.2.11) [53]. This primarily cytosolic enzyme, present in the brain and muscles, is an ATP-dependent enzyme capable of also synthesizing homocarnosine and anserine [54]. Car uptake is an energy-assisted process regulated by means of the PepT2 transporter [55], present in the lung, the spleen, and, to a greater extent, the kidneys [56]. Unlike other endogenous peptides, Car does not undergo the hydrolytic attack of many common peptidases, but can be degraded by two human isoforms of metalloproteases, named carnosinases [57]: the serum-circulating form CN1 (EC 3.4.13.20) [58] and the cytosolic isoform CN2 (EC 3.4.13.18) [59,60]. The CN1, mainly expressed in the central nervous system, is significantly selective and hydrolyses mainly carnosine, with homocarnosine to a lesser extent [61], and its activity increases with age [58]. CN2, present in different human tissues and in the rodent brain, is a non-selective dipeptidase and hydrolyses a large number of dipeptides, but not homocarnosine [61]. The active site of CN2 contains two metal ions and requires at least an Mn2+ equivalent for hydrolytic activity, whereas CN1 commonly utilizes Zn2+ and is activated by Cd2+.
Carnosine is present at micro-to-millimolar concentrations in different tissues (heart, kidney, gastrointestinal tissues, etc.); high concentrations are found in skeletal muscle and in the olfactory bulb, where their concentrations are in the mM range [62], while blood and the cerebrospinal fluid contain a low amount of Car (below 100 nM) [63].
Car is well known for its intracellular proton-buffering ability [64,65] and antioxidant features [66], including: carbonyl group sequestering [67], metal binding [68], superoxide scavenging [69], and cytotoxic α,β-unsaturated aldehyde quenching [70]. Furthermore, Car shows protective effects during nitrosative stress [71], forming carnosine/NO and carnosine/NO2 adducts [72]. The dipeptide also inhibits the aggregation and fibril formation of different proteins, altering the non-covalent bonds between the peptide domains, which drive the oligomerization processes [73,74,75,76]. In addition, carnosine displays anti-glycating activity, avoiding the formation of advanced glycation end products (AGEs) [77,78] and DNA-protein cross-links [79]. Carnosine also protects ceruloplasmin’s antioxidant activities [80] and SOD1 [81]. Carnosine complex with copper (II) ion acts as a SOD1 mimic; this dipeptide capacity is of biological relevance as its high concentration in the skeletal muscle (mM) impacts the copper amount, which represents one-third of the total copper in the body (20–47 mmol/kg) [82].
Different studies report on the anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects mediated by Car [44,83,84]. Dipeptide shows a protective effect from inflammation by decreasing ROS, nitric oxide, and inflammatory cytokine production, and increasing glutathione peroxidase-mediated enzymatic reactions. Car relieves interleukin1α-induced dry-eye disease in rabbits [85] and decreases renal interleukin-6 (IL-6) and the tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) levels in rats during nickel-induced nephrotoxicity [86]. In addition, the complex of zinc(II) with carnosine blocks lipopolysaccharide-driven inflammatory responses by repressing nuclear factor kB (NF-κB) activation [87] or inducing the nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2(Nrf2)-heme oxygenase (HO-1) signaling pathway [88] in RAW 264.7 murine macrophages. Zn-carnosine and some of its derivatives protect gastrointestinal districts by inhibiting NF-κB signaling existing in the colon, reducing interleukin-8 release [89,90], inducing antiulcer effects and wound healing activity [91,92], and preventing inflammatory cell infiltration due to induced colitis in rats [93].
Oxidative stress is widely recognized to be involved in the etiology and pathogenesis of major human diseases [94], including neurodegenerative diseases [95], cardiovascular diseases [96], and diabetes [97]; thus, Car with its well-known direct and indirect antioxidant activity has been assayed in cellular lines and in small animals as a potential therapeutic agent against many degenerative disorders [47,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117].
The protective effects reported in the above-cited studies testify to the pleiotropic ability of the natural dipeptide and its analogs, questioning the attribution of these effects to the antioxidant features alone, and highlighting their potential therapeutic abilities against diverse disorders [118], thus justifying the designation as enigmatic peptides [119].
Car shows metal-binding features and its complexes with copper(II) and zinc(II) ions [120] provide protective effects in vitro and in vivo [82,121,122,123,124]. The attribution of these capacities to the dipeptide’s ability to sequester metal ions as Cu2+ [120] usually overlooks Car’s ionophore ability [125].
Small molecules that can both form metal complexes by binding d-block metal ions and favor their cellular uptake are named ionophores [126]. This class of metal ligands [127,128] perturbs the cell metallome [129], inducing a redistribution of metal ions among various intracellular districts and facilitating their uptake where they are required [130]. Furthermore, ionophores can alter the distribution of a bio-metal among the static metallome (metal ions strongly bound to proteins) [131] and dynamic metallome (metal ions present as labile and exchangeable species) [132]. The dynamic metallome is structured in metal-chaperones [133], metal-transporters [134], transcription factors (TFs) [135], storage molecules, such as metallothioneins (MTs) [136], and low molecular weight molecules like glutathione [137] which altogether guarantee the metallostasis (metal homeostasis) and the redox homeostasis of the cells [138]. This complex network is better known for zinc and copper, which are reduced to Cu+ before their cellular uptake. Copper transporter 1 (Ctr1), SLC 31A1, of the family of solute carriers [139] is the main membrane protein that selectively transports Cu+ into the cell [140] and regulates the intracellular level of the metal ion within the homeostatic range. Different cytosolic chaperones transfer Cu+ to specific partners: (i) the superoxide dismutase copper chaperone (CCS) to SOD1; (ii) cytochrome c oxidase 17 (COX17) to SCO1 and SCO2, which mediate copper incorporation into cytochrome c oxidase [141]; and (iii) antioxidant 1 (Atox-1) that delivers copper to two P-type ATPases, ATP7A and ATP7B [142,143].
Recently, it was shown that cellular incubation of Car [144] and some small peptides [145,146] induces an increase in cytosolic copper levels, acting as ionophores. These ligands utilize the metal ion present in the cell culture medium and the serum used as its supplement, whose total amount ranges between 10−2 μM and μM [147]. This Car behavior influences mainly the expression of two related components of metallostasis: Ctr1 [148] and the Cu-responsive transcription factor Sp1 (specificity protein 1) [135], which regulate the copper homeostasis of cells. Noteworthy, Car also passes through the blood–brain barrier and produces the secretion of neurotrophins (NTs) [149] in glial cells [150], stimulating different cerebral activities and decreasing cognitive decline along the brain–gut axis, by activation of the transcription factor, cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) [151]. This transcription factor, in turn, provokes the synthesis and the release of the NT, Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) [152], also from intestinal epithelial cells [153,154]. BDNF plays a key role in normal brain development [155] and affects synaptic plasticity, learning and memory, neurogenesis, and axonal regeneration [156,157,158]. The binding of BDNF to its tyrosine kinase receptor (TrkB) induces its dimerization and autophosphorylation [159]; the phosphorylated TrkB activates different kinase cascade pathways: phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, mitogen-activated protein kinase, and phospholipase C-c [160,161,162]. All these pathways converge on CREB, a major mediator of neuronal NT activities [163] as also validated by the behavior of the linear and cyclic peptide fragments of different NT N-terminus peptide domains [164,165,166,167,168,169], which imitate the signaling effect of NTs, including the stimulation of tyrosine kinase cascade [170,171], in a copper- and zinc-assisted mode [172,173,174]. Noteworthy, the NT peptide fragments do not just mimic the NT mode of action [166]. The reported ionophore ability of these peptides reinforces the function, recently attributed to copper, of an intracellular signaling modulator [175,176,177,178]. The dual Car ability to act as a copper ionophore and to induce NT expression and release by means of CREB mirrors that observed with NT peptide fragments. However, it is well known that the potential therapeutic action of Car is drastically hampered by its hydrolysis due to serum [57,61] and tissue [59] carnosinase enzymes [179].
Recent reviews report on innovative Car delivery systems, including vesicular systems and hybrid nanoparticles [116], carnosine derivatives and conjugates with small and polymeric carbohydrates [113,114], as well as carnosinase inhibitors [180], which represent new approaches to overcome the limitations of the peptide’s pharmacological use.
Car and some of its analogs (homocarnosine and anserine) conjugated with mono-, di (trehalose), cyclic (β-cyclodextrin), and linear poly-saccharides (hyaluronic acid) show that the glycoconjugation protects the dipeptide from carnosinase hydrolysis, thus improving the availability of carnosine [181,182,183,184]. Here, we demonstrate the abilities of some Car glycoconjugates [113,184,185,186] to display antioxidant, antiaggregating, and neuroprotective functions, which were potentiated by the saccharides (trehalose or hyaluronic acid). The glycoconjugates maintain the metal-binding capacity of the peptide, favoring copper signaling, responsible for the expression of neurotrophic factors such as BDNF and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) [187,188,189,190]. These trophic features were also validated in carnosine-biofunctionalized hydroxyapatite [191].

2.2. Glycyl-L-Histidyl-L-Lysine, GHK

Glycyl-L-histidyl-L-lysine (GHK), structurally related to carnosine, is a natural tripeptide (Figure 3) first isolated from human plasma and also found in saliva and urine [192]. It is produced by the degradation of SPARC, a protein associated with the extracellular matrix (ECM), during the ECM degradation to aid in tissue remodeling by enhancing angiogenesis levels [193]. It shows high affinity for copper [194], forms a copper complex, GHK-Cu, and may act as a metal transporter for cellular uptake [195,196].
Figure 3. Chemical structure of glycyl-L-histidyl-L-lysine (GHK) and its copper (II) complex (GHK-Cu).
GHK shows a protective function quenching α,β-4-hydroxy-trans-2-nonenal [197] and acrolein [198], toxic products of lipid peroxidation involved in some age-related disorders, including AD.
GHK-Cu acts as a growth-affecting factor and a wound-healing agent, inducing dermal fibroblast growth, collagen synthesis, and glycosaminoglycan production [199,200,201,202]. Furthermore, GHK/GHK-Cu enhances the expression of different trophic factors, including the Neurotrophic Growth Factor (NGF) and Neurotrophins (NT-3 and NT-4) in the regenerating tissues [203]. Furthermore, Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSC) treated with the tripeptide show a dose-dependent enhancement of VEGF levels [204], and angiogenesis is induced in rabbit models by copper tripeptide acting as a chemoattractant for capillary cells [205]. In addition, GHK-Cu at a low concentration (1 nM) enhances the expression of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) [206] and VEGF in irradiated human dermal fibroblasts, supporting vessel formation and blood flow into damaged tissues [207]. Different studies report on the roles of GHK/GHK-Cu(II) in tissue repair, bone remodeling, and wound healing [208,209,210]. Moreover, GHK at concentrations of 10 µM or less behaves as an endogenous antioxidant, decreasing the tert-butyl hydroperoxide-induced ROS levels in Caco-2 cells [211], while GHK-Cu exerts antioxidant and anti-inflammatory functions, attenuating cigarette smoke-induced emphysema by downregulating NF-κB inflammation activity and upregulating the antioxidant Nrf2/Keap1 in lung tissues [212]. In a LPS-induced (LPS = lipopolysaccharide) inflammation model in vivo and in vitro, GHK-Cu loaded into hydroxyapatite microspheres (HAPs) and mixed with carboxymethyl cellulose, glycerol, and water forms a gel able to decrease inflammatory agents, ROS levels, and increase SOD activity [46]. The copper(II) complex with GHK shows protective effects in bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis, significantly decreasing the levels of proinflammatory cytokines and oxidative stress, by blocking the progression of epithelial–mesenchymal transition and repressing Transforming Growth Factor-beta1 (TGFβ1) and Suppressor of Mothers against Decapentaplegic2/3 (Smad2/3) signaling pathways [213]. The anti-aging effect of GHK/GHK-Cu was initially restricted to aged-skin remodeling [209] and regeneration [205] until Pickart et al. highlighted that GHK can activate numerous genes involved in nervous system physiology, development, and maintenance [214], using the Broad Institute’s Connectivity Map (cMap) [215]. Specifically, this study reported that the expression of five genes was induced, while no genes were suppressed by GHK. Moreover, the tripeptide behaves as a gene regulator inhibiting histone deacetylase proteins (HDACs) and recalling the features of HDAC inhibitors, which function as neuroprotective and neurodegenerative agents in animal models of brain diseases [216]. In this context, it should be further stressed that though data are collected for GHK without copper, the possibility remains that the actual gene regulator is GHK-Cu formed in the culture media, due to the high affinity of GHK for Cu2+, which can allow obtaining copper from other biological molecules present in the media. These preliminary findings are supported by a more complete study that reports the effect of GHK on gene expression important for nervous system functioning and cognitive decline, as well as reviews genetic and laboratory data relevant to different biological processes and changes in gene expression for different cells [217]. Moreover, GHK can reverse memory impairment in aging mice by targeting anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and epigenetic pathways [218], thus becoming a good candidate as a therapeutic agent in the prevention and treatment of age-associated neurodegeneration and cognitive capacity decrease. This potential effect of GHK-Cu is put in evidence in transgenic 5xFAD mice, a mouse genotype characterized by the presence of amyloid plaques [219]. Transgenic 5xFAD mice are characterized by amyloid neuropathology, similar to the amyloid-plaque pathogenesis observed in AD patients [220], and associated with synaptic alteration and relevant cognitive decline [221]. Intranasal treatment of GHK-Cu [45] provokes a reduction in amyloid plaques and a decrease in monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), a key mediator in AD inflammatory processes [222]. These findings indicate that GHK-Cu has the potential to weaken AD features, including cognitive decline, amyloid plaque accumulation, and neuroinflammation.
However, GHK is characterized by a low survival capacity in human serum, making its delivery to target sites difficult, while GHK-Cu undergoes a rapid degradation in a weakly acidic environment or peptidase attack [223,224]. To maintain the molecular integrity of the tripeptide and its complex with copper(II) ion, different carriers [46,225,226] or nanostructures are employed [227]. Moreover, GHK bioavailability can be obtained by its conjugation with chosen polymers, employing either the tripeptide as such [228,229,230] or some polypeptides encompassing the GHK motif in their sequence [231]. For this aim, hyaluronic acid (HA) [232] is an attractive biopolymer as a delivery system, but it shows scarce stability due to ROS and degradative enzymatic activity that prevent its long-term persistence [233,234]. HA-based conjugates, including small and macromolecule conjugates, cross-linked systems, cell-based HA scaffolds, HA-functionalized inorganic systems, and HA bio-coating molecules, can attenuate the biochemical instability of the biopolymer [235].
Inspired by previous reported findings that: (a) HA and GHK/GHK-Cu, each by itself, show beneficial properties, including antioxidant, antiaggregating, anti-inflammatory, and neuroprotective functions, (b) HA can be degraded by ROS action mainly, while GHK exhibits interesting ROS scavenger properties, and (c) GHK shows limited biochemical stability when free, but it is more stable when somehow anchored to a polymer matrix, the synthesis of HAGHK conjugates was performed [146].
The bioconjugate consists of GHK and hyaluronic acid (MW 200 kDa), linked together through an amide bond between carboxyl residues spanning the polysaccharide chain and the ε-amino group of the lysine residue of the tripeptide (Figure 3). Here, the review reports on the abilities of three different HAGHK conjugates, each with a loading percentage in GHK of 5, 10, or 15% (the term “loading percentage” refers to the percentage of amidated carboxyl groups relative to the number of total carboxylates present in one HA molecule) to display potentiated the protective activities of the single components [146]. HAGHK forms copper(II) complexes, which show SOD1-like activity and induce the expression of trophic proteins VEGF and BDNF. HAGHK behaves as a copper ionophore affecting the level and the localization of both Ctr1 and Atox-1, involved in copper homeostasis and in the metal ion signaling pathways [175].

3. Non-Innocent Partners of β-Alanyl-L-Histidine and Glycyl-L-Histidyl-L-Lysine Glycoconjugates

3.1. Trehalose

Trehalose (Tre) is a non-reducing disaccharide consisting of two glucose units in an α,α-1,1-glycosidic linkage (Figure 4), synthesized in numerous organisms from plants and bacteria to invertebrates and yeast, except humans [236]. This disaccharide is well known to stabilize organisms, inducing anhydrobiosis and cryobiosis tolerance by protecting proteins and cell membranes against environmental stresses [236].
Figure 4. Chemical structure of trehalose.
Moreover, Tre is considered safe for human consumption, with approval as a food ingredient in several countries [237,238].
Tre acts not only as a protector against stress but also as an effective carrier system in pharmaceuticals and biotechnology [239], ensuring stability, bioavailability, and controlled release of therapeutic molecules [240]. The role of Tre as a carrier is not only to stabilize the proteins, but also to actively contribute to maintaining biological activity and increasing the therapeutic efficacy of drugs.
Tre exhibits a broad spectrum of biological activities: antioxidant, cytoprotection, autophagy induction, modulation of metal homeostasis, anti-glycation, and anti-aging [241]. The disaccharide shows antiaggregating and anti-inflammatory properties in both cell culture and animal models [242,243] suggesting a neuroprotective role against neurodegenerative diseases [244]. The ability of Tre to interfere with amyloid beta (Aβ) fibril production and reduce its cytotoxicity indicates its beneficial role in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) [245]. The disaccharide inhibits both polyglutamine-mediated protein aggregation and alpha-synuclein fibrillation, displaying protective activities also in Huntington (HD) and Parkinson (PD) diseases [246,247].
Different reports highlight the antioxidant effects of Tre in vitro and in vivo assays [248]. Treatment with Tre in preclinical studies reveals that this antioxidant molecule significantly decreases the ROS and H2O2 levels in a dose-dependent manner [249] and upregulates gene expression of SOD, GSH, and CAT via promotion of nuclear translocation of Nrf2 [250]. Tre can interact with lipid membranes, helping preserve their integrity against lipid peroxidation, which is a major consequence of oxidative stress, leading to loss of membrane fluidity and cell death. Tre can form hydrogen bonds with phospholipids, thereby shielding membranes from radical attack [251].
In addition to cell stability and stress response, Tre shows anti-inflammatory features by suppressing the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as Interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and TNF-α [252] and blocking NF-κB signaling pathways [253]. By decreasing the excessive inflammatory status that characterizes the neurodegenerative disorders, the disaccharide contributes to mitigating neuroinflammation and its negative effects on neuron health [254].
Different studies report on Tre’s ability to induce autophagy [255,256], improving cellular homeostasis by the mammalian target of rapamycin complex1 pathway involvement and the transcription factor EB4 activation [257,258,259].
This capacity to degrade and recycle damaged proteins makes it a good candidate as a therapeutic agent in neurodegenerative diseases (AD, PD, and HD), where autophagy is compromised [260,261,262]. Furthermore, Tre improves both motor and cognitive outcomes in traumatic brain injury-affected mice and shows significant markers of synapse integrity and neurogenesis, such as synaptophysin, doublecortin, and BDNF, in specific brain regions [263]. Essential metal homeostasis in the brain [264,265] is strongly altered by inflammatory insults, oxidative stress, and neuronal damage, which can contribute to neurodegenerative diseases [266,267]. Recent findings indicate that the disaccharide can regulate the levels of zinc within the brain following traumatic brain injury [268]. The exact molecular mechanisms of this effect on metal ion homeostasis are not fully understood, but Tre probably moderates the depletion of copper, zinc, and iron or promotes their recovery [269]. According to current hypotheses, trehalose interacts with regulatory proteins involved in the binding, storage, chelation, and transport of metals in nerve cells. By influencing these pathways, Tre may help maintain the metal ion balance, thereby supporting a neurochemical environment conducive to neuron survival and cognitive function [270].

3.2. Hyaluronic Acid

Hyaluronic acid (Hyaluronan) [271] is a linear polysaccharide and non-sulfated glycosaminoglycan present in the extracellular matrix, connective tissues, and body fluids. HA biopolymer (Figure 5) is formed by β-1,4- D-glucuronic acid and β-1,3-N-acetyl-D-glucosamine, which are linked β-1,3 and β-1,4 glycosidic bonds in alternative mode [272].
Figure 5. Chemical structure of hyaluronic acid, m—number of repeat units.
HA promotes tissue hydration, joint lubrication, and tissue turgor maintenance; its anionic nature, due to the carboxylic groups and the high number of hydroxyl groups, is responsible for capturing a large amount of water molecules, which explains its viscoelastic and hydrating effects [273,274]. HA is an important component of synovial fluid, where it reduces friction between the surfaces of the articular cartilage and provides resistance to compressive forces [275]. HA is synthesized by hyaluronan synthases represented by three isoforms in humans (HAS1, HAS2, and HAS3) [276,277,278], which give rise to HA chains of different sizes, low-molecular-weight (LMW) HA (6–200 kDa), medium-molecular-weight (MMW) HA (0.2–1.0 MDa), and high-molecular-weight (HMW) HA (>1 MDa) displaying differential biological activities [279,280]. HMW HA (1 MDa) is antiangiogenic, anti-inflammatory, and immunosuppressive [281] and facilitates cellular adhesion and expression of collagen, contributing to wound healing [282,283]. LMW HA induces inflammation, stimulating Toll-like receptor expression and pro-angiogenic processes, favoring cell growth and motility [284,285]. Despite its pro-inflammatory features, LMW HA shows antioxidant effects against ROS and inhibits lipid peroxidation [286]. HA shows a high cellular and tissue turnover rate caused by the degrading enzymes hyaluronidases (HYALs), with HYAL1 and HYAL2 being the main components of this family [287,288]. HYAL2 is stabilized at the cell surface by glycosylphosphatidylinositol and cleaves high molecular weight HA (HMW HA) to smaller polymeric fragments that bind to the glycoprotein CD44 [289], the main components of the HA receptor family, named hyaladherins [290]. Upon the internalization and transport of the fragments to lysosomes, further hydrolytic steps are carried out by HYAL1, which hydrolyzes the β1→4 glycosidic bond of HA, giving rise to various oligosaccharides of different lengths, the shortest of which are tetrasaccharides [287]. In addition to the hydrolysis effects of HYALs, ROS (hydroxyl radicals, peroxynitrite, and hypochlorite anion) degrade HA by randomly cleaving side groups from HA chains, causing the fragmentation of a number of small HA oligosaccharides, including monosaccharides [291,292]. In addition, ROS may both block HA biosynthesis and generate the depolymerization of the already biosynthesized HA polymers [293,294]. Due to their depolymerization effects, ROS also promote subsequent enzymatic cleavage, leading to further HA degradation [295]. Moreover, the interactions of HA with ECM molecules and cell surface receptors give rise to the signaling effects [296,297] that are mainly regulated by hyaladherins [298,299,300]. Endogenous and exogenous HA, mainly HMW HA, show antioxidant activity reducing ROS amounts in diverse cell types, including epithelial corneal cells [301], hepatic cells [302], immune cells [303], chondrocytes [304], and keratinocytes [305]. HA’s protective effects, including wound healing, tissue regeneration, anti-proliferative, anti-diabetic, anti-aging, skin repair, and cosmetic features [306,307,308], together with its properties as a delivery system [309,310], attract great interest for biomedical applications. However, HA, with its low stability and high turnover rate, presents significant restraints for therapeutic use. To overcome these issues, small antioxidant molecules [311], including carnosine [312], in a mixture with HA are required to maintain its molecular integrity and block its degradation. Bioconjugates of HA with protective moieties are able to improve HA stability and obtain derivatives with better beneficial properties [265,313,314].

4. Biological Features of Glycoconjugates

4.1. Glycoconjugates with Trehalose

Glycoconjugates of Car and its analogs with the linear saccharide, Tre, (Figure 6) display several beneficial features in vitro and in vivo [181,182,183,184,315].
Figure 6. Chemical structure of Tre derivatives.
In the same context, cyclic polycarbohydrates, cyclodextrins, represent the first family of saccharides functionalized with the dipeptide, equipped with resistance to carnosinase hydrolysis and relevant functions against oxidative stress and protein aggregation, which are the major factors involved in neurodegeneration [183,316,317]. The copper chelating ability and the ROS scavenger protective activities represent an added value for these compounds, as well as the analogs that Vecchio et al. synthesized utilizing other biomolecules [318,319] and mono-(glucose) or di-saccharide (trehalose) as partners in glycoconjugates [320].
Tre is employed to obtain its conjugates with the two diastereomer components of silibinin, silybin A (SilA) and silybin B (SilB), which bind both toxic Aβ (amyloid beta assemblies) and Aβ monomers, inhibiting the formation of amyloid fibers and delaying amyloid polymer growth [321]. A Tre-conjugated peptidomimetic (Ac-LPFFD-Tre) [322] can recognize a hydrophobic domain of Aβ, modify the aggregation features of the polypeptide, and protect neurons from Aβ oligomers’ toxic insult [323]. Different studies report on the glycoconjugates of Tre with carnosine. Initially, the disaccharide was employed to functionalize the amino group of Car, forming TreCar1 [324,325]; then the dipeptide carboxylate group was involved in the conjugation process with Tre, yielding TreCar2 [186] (Figure 7).
Figure 7. Chemical structure of TreCar1 and TreCar2 (Adapted from Ref. [186]).
Moreover, D-trehalose-L-carnosine and D-trehalose-D-carnosine were synthesized [325] (Figure 8A) and the glycoconjugation was extended to homocarnosine (TreHCar) [182] (Figure 8B).
Figure 8. Chemical structure of (A) TreLCar (* = L), TreDCar (* = D), and (B) TreHCar (Adapted with permission from Refs. [182,326]).
This new class of glycoconjugates synergistically combines the preeminent stabilizing, anti-aggregating, and autophagy-inducing activity of Tre with the antioxidant, antiglycating, anti-inflammatory, and metal-chelating functions of carnosine [52]. Furthermore, Tre protects homocarnosine [182] and carnosine [183] from their degradation by carnosinase and potentiates the SOD-like activity of their copper(II) complexes.
The comparative studies of TreCar1 and TreCar2 reveal structural differences that can affect their beneficial effects. [186] The two trehalose derivatives show an analogous protection from carnosinase-induced hydrolysis, demonstrating that both the carboxyl and primary amino groups of carnosine are crucial for carnosinase recognition and, hence, for peptide hydrolysis (Figure 7). On the contrary, the reaction kinetics of the two Tre-carbosine conjugates (TreCar1 and TreCar2) with acrolein (ACR) were characterized by different trends in the ACR amount reduction. Analogously to Car, TreCar2 reduces the ACR percentage to zero within 4 h, while TreCar1 takes approximately twice as long to reduce the ACR content as TreCar2. This difference can be attributed to the structure of the two derivatives, i.e., to the involvement of the primary amino group, which is more efficient at scavenging ACR than other functional groups. Evident differences appear in the Aβ anti-aggregating effect of the two Tre derivatives, with a major efficacy of TreCar1 in comparison to TreCar2, suggesting a significant role of the negatively charged carboxylic group [186]. The influence of negative charges on the inhibition of amyloid aggregation of some compounds is reported in the literature [326,327] and ascribed to the interaction with the ion pairs of Aβ. The copper chelating ability of TreCar1 and TreCar2 is different, but both show similar abilities against metal-driven Aβ fibril formation and interesting SOD1-like activities of the same order of magnitude as other low molecular-weight SOD mimics.
TreCar1 demonstrates antioxidant effect in cell cultures and also in vivo, in a mouse model of spinal cord injury (SCI), where protection of the Car conjugate [315] amplifies the analogous effect of the parent molecules [99]. TreCar1 treatment inhibits inflammatory stress, blocking the inflammatory signaling pathways activated by NF-kB and exerting protective effects on SCI. Anti-apoptotic and trophic activation by TreCar1 was demonstrated by the positive balance between the anti-apoptotic marker Bcl2 and the pro-apoptotic marker Bax [315].
Tre favors the passage of the dipeptide through the cell membrane, increasing the intracellular level of Car by TreCar and improving its function [185]. The disaccharide also potentiates the ionophore function of the dipeptide that binds copper and zinc ions [120], increasing the metal content within the cells [185]. Thus, TreCar1 can transport into the cell copper present at µM levels in the culture medium and in the added serum, as recently demonstrated for analogous systems [147]. Next, the redistribution of copper ions inside the cell activates the protein kinase cascade; phosphorylation of PI3K/Akt and CREB induces the expression of BDNF, VEGF, and GDNF (Glial-Derived Neurotrophic Factor), which are well-known therapeutic options for neurodegeneration [328].
The ionophore ability of TreCar1 [185] affects the expression of different copper and zinc metallostasis network players [141,329]: Ctr1 [139], Sp1 [135], and Zn influx transporters ZnT1 and ZnT3 [330]. In vivo study demonstrates that TreCar1, similar to Car, chelates extracellular zinc ions, influencing ZnT1 and ZnT3 expression [315]; TreCar1 induces metal ion uptake, increasing the cytosolic labile metal ion pool that is involved in signaling pathways.

4.2. Glycoconjugates with Hyaluronic Acid

The side chain reactive groups of polysaccharides are advantageous for functionalization with active molecules [330,331,332,333] in an effort to obtain new molecular entities featured by biodegradability, bio-compatibility, and less toxicity. Two different HACar derivatives were synthesized, HACar1 [334] (Figure 9), and HACar2 [335] (Figure 10).
Figure 9. Chemical structure of hyaluronic acid derivatives. (A) HACar1 and (B) HAGHK.
Figure 10. Chemical structure of HACar2, m—number of repeat units. (Adapted from Ref. [335]).
HACar1 synthesis results from a combination of HA at two different molecular weights (200 and 700 kDa) with different loading amounts of Car (Table 1). The glycoconjugates show significant beneficial features due to the synergistic contributions of the two components [113].
Table 1. List of HACar1 derivatives. The average number of repeat units conjugated or not to Car (n and m, respectively) was calculated on the basis of the structural characterization (a).
Both HACar1(200) and HACar1(700) derivatives treated with carnosinase display a dipeptide molecular integrity that is approximately one order of magnitude greater than that of Car alone or in a mixture with hyaluronic acid [113].
HACar1(200) conjugates inhibit the formation of Ab-amyloid species in a way directly proportional to their concentration, and the higher the Car content covalently linked to the HA(200) scaffold is assayed, the better the inhibition activity. The similar anti-aggregating behavior of HACar1(700)35 derivative is complemented by its ability to dissolve preformed Aβ fibrils; this dissolution capacity is shared by HACar1(200) conjugates. Noteworthy, these activities of HACar1(200) and HACar1(700) are higher than those of free Car or a mixture of HA and Car, suggesting that the conjugation process provides a synergistic effect.
In vitro studies using neuronal cell models indicate that HA-Car1 suppresses both the initiation and elongation phases of Aβ fibril formation. Cytotoxicity assays show that Hy(200) and Hy(700), as well as their Car conjugates, significantly increase cell viability in the presence of Aβ. This effect could be ascribed to a decrease in the toxic oligomer species that directly reduces the Aβ-induced cell toxicity. It is important to note that the percentage of HA saturation with carnosine plays an important role in this process [113].
As HA protects Car from the carnosinase attack, Car inhibits/delays the HA degradation provoked by hyaluronidase in HACar1(200); the inhibition effect of carnosine on the enzymatic process is proportional to the peptide loading of the polymer with HACar1(200)35 being more efficient than HACar1(200)20 [184].
The Car conjugation not only slows down the hyaluronidase-mediated degradation of the HA backbone, but it also affects the dimensions of the final hydrolytic fragments. Indeed, the extensive hydrolysis of HA leads to the formation of biopolymer fragments containing two or three repetitive units, whereas the hydrolytic products of the enzymatic degradation of HACar1(200)20 encompass up to 17 repetitive units.
The antioxidant properties of the HACar1(200) derivatives tested in relation to a stable radical (ABTS) and a nitrogen (NO) reactive species outperform those of the single parent compounds, as well as their non-covalent mixture, indicating that the chemical conjugation induces the synergistic effect of HA and Car. Noteworthy, the enzymatic degradation of HACar1(200)20 induced by hyaluronidase does not significantly affect the antioxidant activity of the conjugates: the hydrolytic products retain their antioxidant properties. HACar1(200)35, and not HA, preserves the function of Car to quench acrolein, a toxic carbonyl species and a product of oxidative stress [184].
HACar1(200) and HACar1(700) derivatives are ligands able to bind Cu2+, involving multiple binding sites, which increase with higher dipeptide loading and generate polynuclear copper(II) complexes; Cu2+ experiences a 2NIm, 2OCOO binding mode at physiological pH value [326].
The copper(II) complexes with HACar1(200) and HACar1(700) derivatives show a high O2•− scavenging ability. The SOD1-like activity of copper(II) complexes with HA(200) and HA(700) is similar to that displayed by CuCar and comparable to that reported for Cu(HPO4) (Table 2) [326].
Table 2. SOD1-like activity of: (i) the copper(II) complexes with HA(200), HA(700), and Car; (ii) the copper(II) complexes with HACar1 derivatives with different MW and Car loading; and (iii) SOD1 and copper(II) complexes with phosphate.
The I50 values of the copper(II) complexes with HACar1(200) and HACar1(700) derivatives indicate that these conjugates possess scavenging capacities comparable to those shown by the native SOD1. The copper(II) complexes with HACar1(200) show an SOD1-like ability, which increases in a Car-loading-dependent manner. This behavior is less evident for the analogous copper(II)complexes with HACar1(700), which also appear less efficient in comparison with the corresponding species of HACar1(200) due to the higher viscosity of the HACar1(700) solutions.
Previous studies [183,325] report the ability of different saccharides, β-cyclodextrin and α,α-trehalose, conjugated with carnosine to affect the O2 •− scavenger activity of their related copper(II) complexes, improving the SOD-like activity in comparison with that shown by CuCar. The increased scavenging capacity was ascribed to the interaction of the OH groups, which are present in the saccharides, with the O2 •− species, promoting the binding of the superoxide anion radical via the formation of H-bonds, which entrap the O2 •− in the right position to interact with the catalytic metal center. These features favor the formation of functional SOD1 mimics with a scavenger effect of the same order of magnitude as that of the native enzyme. Analogously, the same non-covalent interactions between the HA hydroxyl groups and the O2 •− radicals can be invoked to explain the high SOD-like capacity of the copper(II) complexes with HACar1 derivatives [326].
HA-Car1(200) derivative interaction with submicromolar copper ions from culture medium stimulates the cellular Nrf2 antioxidant signaling pathway and favors its translocation to the nucleus, giving rise to a protective activity against the oxidative stress induced in specific cells treated with inflammatory agents. Inflammatory conditions depress the Nrf2 signaling pathway by drastically reducing HO-1 expression, but this effect is largely counteracted via treatment with HACar1(200) derivative, and its effect is copper-dependent [326].
Moreover, intra-articular HACar1 injections improve joint lubrication and exert anti-inflammatory effects, partly by downregulating oxidative mediators [336]. HACar1 demonstrates synergistic antioxidant effects vs. single compounds or Car + HA mixture and chondroprotective activity in osteoarthritic rat models. Rats with osteoarthritis, treated with the oral administration of HACar1, show a significant decrease in the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines; in contrast, Car alone, HA, or Car + HA do not provoke a significant effect. HACar1 oral treatment reduces the joint inflammation and cartilage degeneration in vivo in a more significant way compared to that of HA and/or Car [336]. Through these combined effects, HA and its conjugates act as a regulator of oxidative and nitrosative pathways, protecting cells from excessive damage and helping to maintain tissue homeostasis.
To preserve the stability of GHK, different tools have also recently been proposed [46,225,337,338]. To the same aim, a new conjugate HAGHK(200) [146], consisting of GHK and hyaluronic acid (MW 200 kDa), was recently synthesized; the tripeptide and the polysaccharides are linked together through an amide bond between the carboxyl residues spanning the polysaccharide chain and the ε-amino group of the lysine residue of the tripeptide (Figure 9B). The functionalization of the amino group present in the side chain of the lysine allows the conjugated tripeptide to maintain the same potential binding features of GHK.
HAGHK synthesis results from a combination of HA (MW 200 kDa) with different amounts of GHK, corresponding to a loading percentage in GHK of 5, 10, or 15% [146]. The synthesized conjugates show good scavenging activity against ROS, indicating that conjugation stabilizes the antioxidant activity of the tripeptide alone. Moreover, the copper(II) complexes with HA or GHK show SOD1-like activity; in analogy to what was reported above for the metal complexes with HACar1(200) or HACar1(700) derivatives, the copper(II) complexes with HAGHK(200) derivatives display a higher SOD1-like activity in comparison with those found for the copper(II) complexes with HA or GHK. This finding highlights that the conjugation potentiates the superoxide radical anion (O2 •−) scavenging ability of GHK-Cu(II). This interesting SOD1-mimicking activity of the new conjugates can be explained by bringing into play the HA hydroxyl groups, which can form a network of hydrogen bonds with the superoxide radical anions, thus favoring their interaction with the catalytic copper ion. It is reasonable to assume that the OH groups mimic the role of positively charged amino acids in the native SOD1 through a process known as “electrostatic tunneling”. As shown in the case of all HACar1 conjugates, the efficiency of SOD1 mimetics is also related to the flexibility of the ligand. This allows the donor atoms to arrange around the metal center during the catalytic process, which is featured by a change in oxidation state of copper, from Cu2+ to Cu+, metal ions that require different coordination geometries.
The HAGHK(200) conjugates show not only chemical but also biological protective effects higher than those of the mixture of its components, highlighting the synergistic role of the covalent coupling of GHK with HA. In in vitro assays, the cellular treatment with HAGHK(200) derivatives put in evidence that the conjugates can bind copper (II) ions present in the culture medium; the metal high affinity of HAGHK(200) derivatives induces an increase in the activity of both HA and GHK, in terms of expression and release of trophic proteins [146].
Until 2008, it was considered that copper transport could only occur in the cytoplasm and membranes, and there was no specific copper chaperone that transported Cu+ ions into the nucleus. However, the work of Itoh et al. [339] changed this paradigm by showing that Atox-1 functions not only as a classical cytosolic Cu chaperone, delivering copper to ATP7A/B when intracellular copper content increases, but also as a copper-dependent transcription factor capable of binding to gene promoter regions and regulating cell proliferation and stress response.
Copper transport may take place in several organelles, as evidenced by the presence of CCS and SOD1 in the nucleus, mitochondria, lysosomes, and peroxisomes [340,341,342]. CCS accumulation in the nucleus [341] occurs under hypoxic conditions, is copper-dependent, and contributes to the hypoxia-inducible factor-1α activation [343,344], which in turn affects VEGF and lysyl oxidase expression [345]. Copper forms a complex with ionophore peptides [147], influences the decrease in the CCS in the cytoplasm, while significantly increasing its nuclear concentration even under normoxic conditions. This indicates a mechanism of interaction between copper and the peptide that promotes the penetration of CCS into the nucleus beyond the pathways caused by hypoxia. In the nucleus, CCS acts as a chaperone, and as a recent study shows [191], functions as a transcription factor, which corresponds to the dual behavior of a chaperone/transcription factor, previously also established for Atox-1 [339].
The ionophore role of HAGHK(200) favors the copper uptake by cells, stimulating intracellular metal signaling pathways of the kinase cascade, according to recent findings [147]. Thus, using endothelial and fibroblast cell models [146], it was shown that copper-driven HAGHK(200) induces the expression or/and release of VEGF, the major angiogenic factor, BDNF, whose are well known physiological functions and therapeutic potential in depression, neurodegeneration and brain cancer [346], and the BMP-2, a key osteogenic factor [347], also involved in the formation of appropriate synaptic connections and development of normal neural circuits in the brain [348]. Moreover, the main copper homeostasis players [141], the high-affinity cellular membrane copper transporter 1, Ctr1 [139], and intracellular copper chaperones such as CCS and Atox-1 [143], play a key role in these processes. Ctr1, which modulates the majority of copper influx in the cell, is required for different trophic factor signals; CCS and Atox1 translocate to the nucleus and act as transcription factors regulating the expression of above mentioned trophic and angiogenic genes.

5. Conclusions

The synthesis of carnosine glycoconjugates with different carbohydrates (cyclodextrins, glucose, sucrose, trehalose, and hyaluronan) produces inhibitors of human serum carnosinase, potentiating the endogenous dipeptide protective activities. Among these, particularly noteworthy are the recent findings which highlight for the first time that endogenous Car plays an antioxidant role in vivo and protects oligodendrocytes against oxidative stress, attenuating myelin loss [349]. Furthermore, recent transcriptome studies indicate a perturbed, mostly decreased, carnosine synthetase expression in demyelinating disorders, including multiple sclerosis [350,351,352]. Within the CNS, however, the absence of Car leads to larger lesions with massive neuroinflammation, demyelination, and neuronal axonal damage, which are partially rescued by exogenous carnosine administration [353]. Analogously, the stabilization of GHK-Cu by glycoconjugation recalls a recent report on the use of new biotinylated GHK and related copper(II) complex for neurodegenerative disorders [230], offering new potentiated stimuli to the neuroprotective activities of GHK/GHK-Cu [354,355,356,357,358].
In some cases, the protective activities carried out in vitro refer to GHK, but it is reasonable to accept the suggestion that the active species is GHK-Cu formed by GHK interaction with the metal ion present in the culture medium and in the added serum [205]. The occurrence of an analogous involvement of copper is generally overlooked in in vitro findings, as well as in the rationalization of the protective abilities of Car application for the treatment of several diseases, including neurodegeneration [71,117,359,360,361]. The appreciation of metal binding and ionophore ability of small peptides, together with the capacity of elements of d-block elements to activate relevant signaling pathways [180], allowed for a more complete description of the neuroprotective functions of NT mimics [145,147,164,165,166,167,168,169,362]. Analogously, the two endogenous peptides, Car and GHK, and their glycoconjugates favor cellular uptake of added or culture medium copper that translates at the nucleus as CCS and Atox1, where the two chaperones support or act as transcription factors originating the expression/release of neurotrophic and angiogenic proteins. Furthermore, the contribution of the disaccharide Tre and polysaccharide HA is more extensive than initially planned in view of obtaining efficient delivery systems; both saccharides share with the endogenous peptides their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-aggregating features and their ability to affect the bioavailability of metal ions [269,363]. In addition, different studies report on the HA [364,365] and Tre [366,367,368] abilities to promote neuroprotection in different brain diseases, extending the sharing with the peptides of the above highlighted functions, and paving the way to potential developments of these glycoconjugates for treatments against neurodegenerative disorders.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.R.; writing—original draft preparation, E.R. and I.N.; writing—review and editing, E.R. and I.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by MUR PON Ricerca e Innovazione 2014-2020–MIUR- BONE++ (ARS01_00693) (E.R.).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the contributions of the Colleagues involved in the glycoconjugate research and are grateful for their invaluable support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Espinosa-Vellarino, F.L.; Garrido, I.; Ortega, A.; Casimiro, I.; Espinosa, F. Effects of Antimony on Reactive Oxygen and Nitrogen Species (ROS and RNS) and Antioxidant Mechanisms in Tomato Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hong, Y.; Boiti, A.; Vallone, D.; Foulkes, N.S. Reactive Oxygen Species Signaling and Oxidative Stress: Transcriptional Regulation and Evolution. Antioxidants 2024, 13, 312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Song, P.; Zou, M. Roles of Reactive Oxygen Species in Physiology and Pathology. In Atherosclerosis; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2015; pp. 379–392. ISBN 9781118828533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mani, S. Production of Reactive Oxygen Species and Its Implication in Human Diseases. In Free Radicals in Human Health and Disease; Springer: New Delhi, India, 2015; ISBN 9788132220350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Haber, F.; Weiss, J. The Catalytic Decomposition of Hydrogen Peroxide by Iron Salts. Proc. R. Soc. London. Ser. A-Math. Phys. Sci. 1934, 147, 332–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Perluigi, M.; Di Domenico, F.; Butterfield, D.A. Oxidative damage in neurodegeneration: Roles in the pathogenesis and progression of Alzheimer disease. Physiol. Rev. 2024, 104, 103–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Liu, T.; Shang, J.; Chen, Q. Superoxide Dismutases in Immune Regulation and Infectious Diseases. Antioxidants 2025, 14, 809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Power, J.H.T.; Blumbergs, P.C. Cellular Glutathione Peroxidase in Human Brain: Cellular Distribution, and Its Potential Role in the Degradation of Lewy Bodies in Parkinson’s Disease and Dementia with Lewy Bodies. Acta Neuropathol. 2009, 117, 63–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, P.; Liu, W.; Han, C.; Wang, S.; Bai, M.; Song, C. Reactive Oxygen Species: Multidimensional Regulators of Plant Adaptation to Abiotic Stress and Development. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2024, 66, 330–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pei, J.; Pan, X.; Wei, G.; Hua, Y. Research Progress of Glutathione Peroxidase Family (GPX) in Redoxidation. Front. Pharmacol. 2023, 14, 1147414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jena, A.B.; Samal, R.R.; Bhol, N.K.; Duttaroy, A.K. Cellular Red-Ox System in Health and Disease: The Latest Update. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2023, 162, 114606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ma, L.; Wu, F.; Shao, Q.; Chen, G.; Xu, L.; Lu, F. Baicalin Alleviates Oxidative Stress and Inflammation in Diabetic Nephropathy via Nrf2 and MAPK Signaling Pathway. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 2021, 21, 3207–3221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Behl, T.; Upadhyay, T.; Singh, S.; Chigurupati, S.; Alsubayiel, A.M.; Mani, V.; Vargas-De-la-cruz, C.; Uivarosan, D.; Bustea, C.; Sava, C.; et al. Polyphenols Targeting MAPK Mediated Oxidative Stress and Inflammation in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Molecules 2021, 26, 6570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Safaroghli-Azar, A.; Sanaei, M.J.; Pourbagheri-Sigaroodi, A.; Bashash, D. Phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) classes: From cell signaling to endocytic recycling and autophagy. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2023, 953, 175827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Leslie, N.R.; Bennett, D.; Lindsay, Y.E.; Stewart, H.; Gray, A.; Downes, C.P. Redox Regulation of PI 3-Kinase Signalling via Inactivation of PTEN. EMBO J. 2003, 22, 5501–5510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Leslie, N.R.; Downes, C.P. PTEN: The down Side of PI 3-Kinase Signalling. Cell. Signal. 2002, 14, 285–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, Y.; Han, S.-J.; Park, I.; Kim, I.; Chay, K.-O.; Kim, S.; Jang, D.; Lee, T.-H.; Lee, S.-R. Redox Regulation of the Tumor Suppressor PTEN by Hydrogen Peroxide and Tert-Butyl Hydroperoxide. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Stanley, W.J.; Litwak, S.A.; Quah, H.S.; Tan, S.M.; Kay, T.W.H.; Tiganis, T.; De Haan, J.B.; Thomas, H.E.; Gurzov, E.N. Inactivation of Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases Enhances Interferon Signaling in Pancreatic Islets. Diabetes 2015, 64, 2489–2496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Raninga, P.V.; Di Trapani, G.; Tonissen, K.F. Cross Talk between Two Antioxidant Systems, Thioredoxin and DJ-1: Consequences for Cancer. Oncoscience 2014, 1, 95–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Averill-Bates, D. Reactive Oxygen Species and Cell Signaling. Review. Biochim. Et Biophys. Acta-Mol. Cell Res. 2024, 1871, 119573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Angkeow, P.; Deshpande, S.S.; Qi, B.; Liu, Y.-X.; Park, Y.C.; Jeon, B.H.; Ozaki, M.; Irani, K. Redox Factor-1: An Extra-Nuclear Role in the Regulation of Endothelial Oxidative Stress and Apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 2002, 9, 717–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Hybertson, B.M.; Gao, B.; Bose, S.K.; McCord, J.M. Oxidative Stress in Health and Disease: The Therapeutic Potential of Nrf2 Activation. Mol. Asp. Med. 2011, 32, 234–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ma, Q. Role of Nrf2 in Oxidative Stress and Toxicity. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2013, 53, 401–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Oshikawa, J.; Kim, S.J.; Furuta, E.; Caliceti, C.; Chen, G.F.; McKinney, R.D.; Kuhr, F.; Levitan, I.; Fukai, T.; Ushio-Fukai, M. Novel Role of P66shc in ROS-Dependent VEGF Signaling and Angiogenesis in Endothelial Cells. Am. J. Physiol.-Heart Circ. Physiol. 2012, 302, H724–H732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Guo, Z.; Kozlov, S.; Lavin, M.F.; Person, M.D.; Paull, T.T. ATM Activation by Oxidative Stress. Science 2010, 330, 517–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Barnham, K.J.; Masters, C.L.; Bush, A.I. Neurodegenerative Diseases and Oxidative Stress. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2004, 3, 205–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Olufunmilayo, E.O.; Gerke-Duncan, M.B.; Holsinger, R.M.D. Oxidative Stress and Antioxidants in Neurodegenerative Disorders. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yan, Q.; Liu, S.; Sun, Y.; Chen, C.; Yang, S.; Lin, M.; Long, J.; Yao, J.; Lin, Y.; Yi, F.; et al. Targeting Oxidative Stress as a Preventive and Therapeutic Approach for Cardiovascular Disease. J. Transl. Med. 2023, 21, 519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gorrini, C.; Harris, I.S.; Mak, T.W. Modulation of Oxidative Stress as an Anticancer Strategy. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2013, 12, 931–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, D.; Yu, Q.; Wu, R.; Tuo, Z.; Wang, J.; Ye, L.; Shao, F.; Chaipanichkul, P.; Yoo, K.H.; Wei, W.; et al. Interactions between Oxidative Stress and Senescence in Cancer: Mechanisms, Therapeutic Implications, and Future Perspectives. Redox Biol. 2024, 73, 103208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Velayati, A.; Vafa, M.R.; Sani’ee, N.; Darabi, Z. Therapeutic Effects and Mechanisms of Action of Ginger and Its Bioactive Components on Inflammatory Response, Oxidative Stress, the Immune System, and Organ Failure in Sepsis: A Comprehensive Systematic Review. Nutr. Rev. 2024, 82, 1800–1819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Wang, X.; Michaelis, E.K. Selective Neuronal Vulnerability to Oxidative Stress in the Brain. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2010, 30, 2–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Ferreira, M.E.S.; de Vasconcelos, A.S.; da Costa Vilhena, T.; da Silva, T.L.; da Silva Barbosa, A.; Gomes, A.R.Q.; Dolabela, M.F.; Percário, S. Oxidative Stress in Alzheimer’s Disease: Should We Keep Trying Antioxidant Therapies? Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 2015, 35, 595–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Firuzi, O.; Miri, R.; Tavakkoli, M.; Saso, L. Antioxidant Therapy: Current Status and Future Prospects. Curr. Med. Chem. 2012, 18, 3871–3888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Eid, A.M.; Faridar, A.; Appel, S.H. Therapeutic Strategies in Neurodegenerative Diseases. In Neuroimmune Pharmacology and Therapeutics; Gendelman, H.E., Ikezu, T., Eds.; Springer Nature Switzerland: Cham, Switzerland, 2024; pp. 671–704. ISBN 978-3-031-68237-7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Morén, C.; de Souza, R.M.; Giraldo, D.M.; Uff, C. Antioxidant Therapeutic Strategies in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 9328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chakraborty, S.; Shankaranarayana Rao, B.S.; Tripathi, S.J. The neuroprotective effects of N-acetylcysteine in psychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders: From modulation of glutamatergic transmission to restoration of synaptic plasticity. Neuropharmacology 2025, 278, 110527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Fajkiel-Madajczyk, A.; Wiciński, M.; Kurant, Z.; Sławatycki, J.; Słupski, M. Evaluating the Role of Coenzyme Q10 in Migraine Therapy—A Narrative Review. Antioxidants 2025, 14, 318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Alberts, A.; Moldoveanu, E.-T.; Niculescu, A.-G.; Grumezescu, A.M. Vitamin C: A Comprehensive Review of Its Role in Health, Disease Prevention, and Therapeutic Potential. Molecules 2025, 30, 748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Yamashita, T.; Abe, K. Update on Antioxidant Therapy with Edaravone: Expanding Applications in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 2945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Grabska-Kobyłecka, I.; Szpakowski, P.; Król, A.; Książek-Winiarek, D.; Kobyłecki, A.; Głąbiński, A.; Nowak, D. Polyphenols and Their Impact on the Prevention of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Development. Nutrients 2023, 15, 3454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Suzuki, K. Anti-Oxidants for Therapeutic Use: Why Are Only a Few Drugs in Clinical Use? Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2009, 61, 287–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Khavinson, V.; Linkova, N.; Kozhevnikova, E.; Dyatlova, A.; Petukhov, M. Transport of Biologically Active Ultra short Peptides Using POT and LAT Carriers. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 7733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kumar, A.; Suryakumar, G.; Singh, S.N.; Rathor, R. A Comprehensive Review on Physiological and Biological Activities of Carnosine: Turning from Preclinical Facts to Potential Clinical Applications. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Arch. Pharmacol. 2025, 398, 1341–1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Tucker, M.; Liao, G.Y.; Park, J.Y.; Rosenfeld, M.; Wezeman, J.; Mangalindan, R.; Ratner, D.; Darvas, M.; Ladiges, W. Behavioral and Neuropathological Features of Alzheimer’s Disease Are Attenuated in 5xFAD Mice Treated with Intranasal GHK Peptide. bioRxiv 2023. bioRxiv:2023.11.20.567908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Hu, D.; Zhang, X.; Gong, S.; Ma, W.; Cheng, B.; Yang, J.; Yan, L.; Li, B.; Qiu, T.; Wang, X. An Injectable Hydroxyapatite Microsphere Filler Loaded with GHK-Cu Tripeptide for Anti-Inflammatory and Antioxidant. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2025, 256, 114982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bellia, F.; Vecchio, G.; Cuzzocrea, S.; Calabrese, V.; Rizzarelli, E. Neuroprotective Features of Carnosine in Oxidative Driven Diseases. Mol. Asp. Med. 2011, 32, 258–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Crush, K.G. Carnosine and Related Substances in Animal Tissues. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 1970, 34, 3–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Boldyrev, A.A.; Severin, S.E. The Histidine-Containing Dipeptides, Carnosine and Anserine: Distribution, Properties and Biological Significance. Adv. Enzym. Regul. 1990, 30, 175–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bauer, K. Carnosine and Homocarnosine, the Forgotten, Enigmatic Peptides of the Brain. Neurochem. Res. 2005, 30, 1339–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Braga, J.D.; Komaru, T.; Umino, M.; Nagao, T.; Matsubara, K.; Egusa, A.; Yanaka, N.; Nishimura, T.; Kumrungsee, T. Histidine-Containing Dipeptide Deficiency Links to Hyperactivity and Depression-like Behaviors in Old Female Mice. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2024, 729, 150361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kohen, R.; Yamamoto, Y.; Cundy, K.C.; Ames, B.N. Antioxidant Activity of Carnosine, Homocarnosine, and Anserine Present in Muscle and Brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1988, 85, 3175–3179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Drozak, J.; Veiga-da-Cunha, M.; Vertommen, D.; Stroobant, V.; Van Schaftingen, E. Molecular Identification of Carnosine Synthase as ATP-Grasp Domain-Containing Protein 1 (ATPGD1). J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 9346–9935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Horinishi, H.; Grillo, M.; Margolis, F.L. Purification and Characterization of Carnosine Synthetase from Mouse Olfactory Bulbs. J. Neurochem. 1978, 31, 909–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Xiang, J.; Hu, Y.; Smith, D.E.; Keep, R.F. PEPT2-Mediated Transport of 5-Aminolevulinic Acid and Carnosine in Astrocytes. Brain Res. 2006, 1122, 18–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Saito, H.; Terada, T.; Okuda, M.; Sasaki, S.; Inui, K. Molecular Cloning and Tissue Distribution of Rat Peptide Transporter PEPT2. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Biomembr. 1996, 1280, 173–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Bellia, F.; Vecchio, G.; Rizzarelli, E. Carnosinases, Their Substrates and Diseases. Molecules 2014, 19, 2299–2329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Lenney, J.F.; George, R.P.; Weiss, A.M.; Kucera, C.M.; Chan, P.W.H.; Rinzler, G.S. Human Serum Carnosinase: Characterization, Distinction from Cellular Carnosinase, and Activation by Cadmium. Clin. Chim. Acta 1982, 123, 221–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Lenney, J.F.; Peppers, S.C.; Kucera-Orallo, C.M.; George, R.P. Characterization of Human Tissue Carnosinase. Biochem. J. 1985, 228, 653–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Otani, H.; Okumura, N.; Hashida-Okumura, A.; Nagai, K. Identification and Characterization of a Mouse Dipeptidase That Hydrolyzes L-Carnosine. J. Biochem. 2005, 137, 167–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Teufel, M.; Saudek, V.; Ledig, J.-P.; Bernhardt, A.; Boularand, S.; Carreau, A.; Cairns, N.J.; Carter, C.; Cowley, D.J.; Duverger, D.; et al. Sequence Identification and Characterization of Human Carnosinase and a Closely Related Non-Specific Dipeptidase. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 6521–6531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Boldyrev, A.A.; Aldini, G.; Derave, W. Physiology and Pathophysiology of Carnosine. Physiol. Rev. 2013, 93, 1803–1845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Gjessing, L.R.; Lunde, H.A.; MØrkrid, L.; Lenney, J.F.; Sjaastad, O. Inborn Errors of Carnosine and Homocarnosine Metabolism. In Neurotransmitter Actions and Interactions; Springer: Vienna, Austria, 1990; Volume 29, pp. 91–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Abe, H. Role of Histidine-Related Compounds as Intracellular Proton Buffering Constituents in Vertebrate Muscle. Biochem. C/C Biokhimiia 2000, 65, 757–765. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  65. Posa, D.K.; Baba, S.P. Intracellular Ph Regulation of Skeletal Muscle in the Milieu of Insulin Signaling. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Chasovnikova, L.V.; Formazyuk, V.E.; Sergienko, V.I.; Boldyrev, A.A.; Severin, S.E. The Antioxidative Properties of Carnosine and Other Drugs. Biochem. Int. 1990, 20, 1097–1103. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  67. Aldini, G.; de Courten, B.; Regazzoni, L.; Gilardoni, E.; Ferrario, G.; Baron, G.; Altomare, A.; D’Amato, A.; Vistoli, G.; Carini, M. Understanding the Antioxidant and Carbonyl Sequestering Activity of Carnosine: Direct and Indirect Mechanisms. Free Radic. Res. 2021, 55, 321–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Torreggiani, A.; Tamba, M.; Fini, G. Binding of Copper(II) to Carnosine: Raman and IR Spectroscopic Study. Biopolymers 2000, 57, 149–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Pavlov, A.R.; Revina, A.A.; Dupin, A.M.; Boldyrev, A.A.; Yaropolov, A.I. The Mechanism of Interaction of Carnosine with Superoxide Radicals in Water Solutions. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Gen. Subj. 1993, 1157, 304–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Aldini, G.; Carini, M.; Beretta, G.; Bradamante, S.; Facino, R.M. Carnosine Is a Quencher of 4-Hydroxy-Nonenal: Through What Mechanism of Reaction? Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2002, 298, 699–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Calabrese, V.; Colombrita, C.; Guagliano, E.; Sapienza, M.; Ravagna, A.; Cardile, V.; Scapagnini, G.; Santoro, A.M.; Mangiameli, A.; Butterfield, D.A.; et al. Protective Effect of Carnosine during Nitrosative Stress in Astroglial Cell Cultures. Neurochem. Res. 2005, 30, 797–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Nicoletti, V.G.; Santoro, A.M.; Grasso, G.; Vagliasindi, L.I.; Giuffrida, M.L.; Cuppari, C.; Purrello, V.S.; Stella, A.M.G.; Rizzarelli, E. Carnosine Interaction with Nitric Oxide and Astroglial Cell Protection. J. Neurosci. Res. 2007, 85, 2239–2245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Attanasio, F.; Convertino, M.; Magno, A.; Caflisch, A.; Corazza, A.; Haridas, H.; Esposito, G.; Cataldo, S.; Pignataro, B.; Milardi, D.; et al. Carnosine Inhibits Aβ42 Aggregation by Perturbing the H-Bond Network in and around the Central Hydrophobic Cluster. ChemBioChem 2013, 14, 583–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Attanasio, F.; Cataldo, S.; Fisichella, S.; Nicoletti, S.; Nicoletti, V.G.; Pignataro, B.; Savarino, A.; Rizzarelli, E. Protective Effects of L- and D-Carnosine on α-Crystallin Amyloid Fibril Formation: Implications for Cataract Disease. Biochemistry 2009, 48, 6522–6531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Aloisi, A.; Barca, A.; Romano, A.; Guerrieri, S.; Storelli, C.; Rinaldi, R.; Verri, T. Anti-Aggregating Effect of the Naturally Occurring Dipeptide Carnosine on Aβ1-42 Fibril Formation. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e68159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Villari, V.; Attanasio, F.; Micali, N. Control of the Structural Stability of α-Crystallin under Thermal and Chemical Stress: The Role of Carnosine. J. Phys. Chem. B 2014, 118, 13770–13776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Yeargans, G.S.; Seidler, N.W. Carnosine Promotes the Heat Denaturation of Glycated Protein. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2003, 300, 75–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Vinson, J.A.; Howard, T.B. Inhibition of Protein Glycation and Advanced Glycation End Products by Ascorbic Acid and Other Vitamins and Nutrients. J. Nutr. Biochem. 1996, 7, 659–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Hipkiss, A.R.; Preston, J.E.; Himsworth, D.T.M.; Worthington, V.C.; Keown, M.; Michaelis, J.; Lawrence, J.; Mateen, A.; Allende, L.; Eagles, P.A.M.; et al. Pluripotent Protective Effects of Carnosine, a Naturally Occurring Dipeptide A. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1998, 854, 37–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Hoon Kang, J.; Sik Kim, K.; Young Choi, S.; Yil Kwon, H.; Ho Won, M.; Kang, T.-C. Carnosine and Related Dipeptides Protect Human Ceruloplasmin against Peroxyl Radical-Mediated Modification. Mol. Cells 2002, 13, 498–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Choi, S.Y.; Kwon, H.Y.; Bin Kwon, O.; Kang, J.H. Hydrogen Peroxide-Mediated Cu,Zn-Superoxide Dismutase Fragmentation: Protection by Carnosine, Homocarnosine and Anserine. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Gen. Subj. 1999, 1472, 651–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Kohen, R.; Misgav, R.; Ginsburg, I. The Sod Like Activity of Copper: Carnosine, Copper: Anserine and Copper: Homocarnosine Complexes. Free Radic. Res. Commun. 1991, 12, 179–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Hu, X.; Fukui, Y.; Feng, T.; Bian, Z.; Yu, H.; Morihara, R.; Hu, X.; Bian, Y.; Sun, H.; Takemoto, M.; et al. Neuroprotective Effects of Carnosine in a Mice Stroke Model Concerning Oxidative Stress and Inflammatory Response. J. Neurol. Sci. 2023, 447, 120608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Caruso, G.; Fresta, C.G.; Fidilio, A.; O’Donnell, F.; Musso, N.; Lazzarino, G.; Grasso, M.; Amorini, A.M.; Tascedda, F.; Bucolo, C.; et al. Carnosine Decreases PMA-Induced Oxidative Stress and Inflammation in Murine Macrophages. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Mousa, A.M.; Aldebasi, Y.H. L-Carnosine Mitigates Interleukin-1α-Induced Dry Eye Disease in Rabbits via Its Antioxidant, Anti-Inflammatory, Antiapoptotic, and Antifibrotic Effects. Cutan. Ocul. Toxicol. 2021, 40, 241–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Hasanein, P.; Felegari, Z. Chelating Effects of Carnosine in Ameliorating Nickel-Induced Nephrotoxicity in Rats. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2017, 95, 1426–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Ooi, T.C.; Chan, K.M.; Sharif, R. Zinc Carnosine Inhibits Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Inflammatory Mediators by Suppressing NF-Κb Activation in Raw 264.7 Macrophages, Independent of the MAPKs Signaling Pathway. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2016, 172, 458–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Ooi, T.C.; Chan, K.M.; Sharif, R. Zinc L-Carnosine Suppresses Inflammatory Responses in Lipopolysaccharide-Induced RAW 264.7 Murine Macrophages Cell Line via Activation of Nrf2/HO-1 Signaling Pathway. Immunopharmacol. Immunotoxicol. 2017, 39, 259–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Boldyrev, A.A. Carnosine: New Concept for the Function of an Old Molecule. Biochemistry 2012, 77, 313–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Hewlings, S.; Kalman, D. A Review of Zinc-L-Carnosine and Its Positive Effects on Oral Mucositis, Taste Disorders, and Gastrointestinal Disorders. Nutrients 2020, 12, 665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Matsukura, T.; Tanaka, H. Applicability of Zinc Complex of L-Carnosine for Medical Use. Biochem. C/C Biokhimiia 2000, 65, 817–823. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  92. Ito, M.; Tanaka, T.; Susuki, Y. Effect of N-(3-Aminopropionyl)-L-Histidinato Zinc (Z-103) on Healing and Hydrocortisone-Induced Relapse of Acetic Acid Ulcers in Rats with Limited Food-Intake-Time. Jpn. J. Pharmacol. 1990, 52, 513–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Yoshikawa, T.; Yamaguchi, T.; Yoshida, N.; Yamamoto, H.; Kitazumi, S.; Takahashi, S.; Naito, Y.; Kondo, M. Effect of Z-103 on TNB-Lnduced Colitis in Rats. Digestion 1997, 58, 464–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Domann, F.E. Aberrant Free Radical Biology Is a Unifying Theme in the Etiology and Pathogenesis of Major Human Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 8491–8495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Singh, A.; Kukreti, R.; Saso, L.; Kukreti, S. Oxidative Stress: A Key Modulator in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Molecules 2019, 24, 1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Kanaan, G.N.; Harper, M.-E. Cellular Redox Dysfunction in the Development of Cardiovascular Diseases. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Gen. Subj. 2017, 1861, 2822–2829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Oberley, L.W. Free Radicals and Diabetes. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1988, 5, 113–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Cuzzocrea, S.; Genovese, T.; Failla, M.; Vecchio, G.; Fruciano, M.; Mazzon, E.; Di Paola, R.; Muià, C.; La Rosa, C.; Crimi, N.; et al. Protective Effect of Orally Administered Carnosine on Bleomycin-Induced Lung Injury. Am. J. Physiol.-Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2007, 292, L1095–L1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Di Paola, R.; Impellizzeri, D.; Salinaro, A.T.; Mazzon, E.; Bellia, F.; Cavallaro, M.; Cornelius, C.; Vecchio, G.; Calabrese, V.; Rizzarelli, E.; et al. Administration of Carnosine in the Treatment of Acute Spinal Cord Injury. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2011, 82, 1478–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Saadah, L.M.; Abu Deiab, G.I.; Al-Balas, Q.; Basheti, I.A. Carnosine to Combat Novel Coronavirus (Ncov): Molecular Docking and Modeling to Cocrystallized Host Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 (Ace2) and Viral Spike Protein. Molecules 2020, 25, 5605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Oppermann, H.; Faust, H.; Yamanishi, U.; Meixensberger, J.; Gaunitz, F. Carnosine Inhibits Glioblastoma Growth Independent from PI3K/Akt/MTOR Signaling. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0218972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Corona, C.; Frazzini, V.; Silvestri, E.; Lattanzio, R.; la Sorda, R.; Piantelli, M.; Canzoniero, L.M.T.; Ciavardelli, D.; Rizzarelli, E.; Sensi, S.L. Effects of Dietary Supplementation of Carnosine on Mitochondrial Dysfunction, Amyloid Pathology, and Cognitive Deficits in 3xTg-AD Mice. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e17971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Baye, E.; Ukropec, J.; de Courten, M.P.J.; Kurdiova, T.; Krumpolec, P.; Fernández-Real, J.-M.; Aldini, G.; Ukropcova, B.; de Courten, B. Carnosine Supplementation Reduces Plasma Soluble Transferrin Receptor in Healthy Overweight or Obese Individuals: A Pilot Randomised Trial. Amino Acids 2019, 51, 73–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Scuto, M.; Trovato Salinaro, A.; Modafferi, S.; Polimeni, A.; Pfeffer, T.; Weigand, T.; Calabrese, V.; Schmitt, C.P.; Peters, V. Carnosine Activates Cellular Stress Response in Podocytes and Reduces Glycative and Lipoperoxidative Stress. Biomedicines 2020, 8, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Spina-Purrello, V.; Giliberto, S.; Barresi, V.; Nicoletti, V.G.; Giuffrida Stella, A.M.; Rizzarelli, E. Modulation of PARP-1 and PARP-2 Expression by L-Carnosine and Trehalose after LPS and INFγ-Induced Oxidative Stress. Neurochem. Res. 2010, 35, 2144–2153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Albrecht, T.; Schilperoort, M.; Zhang, S.; Braun, J.D.; Qiu, J.; Rodriguez, A.; Pastene, D.O.; Krämer, B.K.; Köppel, H.; Baelde, H.; et al. Carnosine Attenuates the Development of Both Type 2 Diabetes and Diabetic Nephropathy in BTBR Ob/Ob Mice. Sci. Rep. 2017, 10, 44492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Tanaka, K.-I.; Sugizaki, T.; Kanda, Y.; Tamura, F.; Niino, T.; Kawahara, M. Preventive Effects of Carnosine on Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Lung Injury. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 42813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Jain, S.; Kim, E.-S.; Kim, D.; Burrows, D.; De Felice, M.; Kim, M.; Baek, S.-H.; Ali, A.; Redgrave, J.; Doeppner, T.R.; et al. Comparative Cerebroprotective Potential of D- and l-Carnosine Following Ischemic Stroke in Mice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Boakye, A.; Zhang, D.; Guo, L.; Zhang, Y.; Hoetker, D.; Zhao, J.; Posa, D.; Ng, C.K.; Zheng, H.; Kumar, A.; et al. Carnosine Supplementation Enhances Post Ischemic Hind Limb Revascularization. Front. Physiol. 2019, 2, 751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Maugeri, S.; Sibbitts, J.; Privitera, A.; Cardaci, V.; Di Pietro, L.; Leggio, L.; Iraci, N.; Lunte, S.M.; Caruso, G. The Anti-Cancer Activity of the Naturally Occurring Dipeptide Carnosine: Potential for Breast Cancer. Cells 2023, 12, 2592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Caruso, G.; Caraci, F.; Jolivet, R.B. Pivotal Role of Carnosine in the Modulation of Brain Cells Activity: Multimodal Mechanism of Action and Therapeutic Potential in Neurodegenerative Disorders. Prog. Neurobiol. 2019, 175, 35–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Peng, W.; Mao, P.; Liu, L.; Chen, K.; Zhong, Y.; Xia, W.; Guo, Q.; Tan, S.C.; Rahmani, J.; Kord Varkaneh, H.; et al. Effect of Carnosine Supplementation on Lipid Profile, Fasting Blood Glucose, HbA1C and Insulin Resistance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Long-Term Randomized Controlled Trials. Complement. Ther. Med. 2020, 48, 102241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Greco, V.; Naletova, I.; Ahmed, I.M.M.; Vaccaro, S.; Messina, L.; La Mendola, D.; Bellia, F.; Sciuto, S.; Satriano, C.; Rizzarelli, E. Hyaluronan-Carnosine Conjugates Inhibit Aβ Aggregation and Toxicity. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 15998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Bellia, F.; Vecchio, G.; Rizzarelli, E. Carnosine Derivatives: New Multifunctional Drug-like Molecules. Amino Acids 2012, 43, 153–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Miceli, V.; Pampalone, M.; Frazziano, G.; Grasso, G.; Rizzarelli, E.; Ricordi, C.; Casu, A.; Iannolo, G.; Conaldi, P.G. Carnosine Protects Pancreatic Beta Cells and Islets against Oxidative Stress Damage. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2018, 474, 105–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Bonaccorso, A.; Privitera, A.; Grasso, M.; Salamone, S.; Carbone, C.; Pignatello, R.; Musumeci, T.; Caraci, F.; Caruso, G. The Therapeutic Potential of Novel Carnosine Formulations: Perspectives for Drug Development. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Caruso, G.; Di Pietro, L.; Cardaci, V.; Maugeri, S.; Caraci, F. The Therapeutic Potential of Carnosine: Focus on Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms. Curr. Res. Pharmacol. Drug Discov. 2023, 4, 100153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Aruoma, O.I.; Laughton, M.J.; Halliwell, B. Carnosine, Homocarnosine and Anserine: Could They Act as Antioxidants in Vivo ? Biochem. J. 1989, 264, 863–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Babizhayev, M.A.; Yegorov, Y.E. An “Enigmatic” L-Carnosine (β-Alanyl-L-Histidine)? Cell Proliferative Activity as a Fundamental Property of a Natural Dipeptide Inherent to Traditional Antioxidant, Anti-Aging Biological Activities: Balancing and a Hormonally Correct Agent, Novel Patented Oral Therapy Dosage Formulation for Mobility, Skeletal Muscle Power and Functional Performance, Hypothalamic-Pituitary- Brain Relationship in Health, Aging and Stress Studies. Recent Pat. Drug Deliv. Formul. 2015, 9, 1–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Baran, E.J. Metal Complexes of Carnosine. Biochem. C/C Biokhimiia 2000, 65, 789–797. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  121. Horning, M.S.; Blakemore, L.J.; Trombley, P.Q. Endogenous Mechanisms of Neuroprotection: Role of Zinc, Copper, and Carnosine. Brain Res. 2000, 852, 56–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Coddou, C.; Villalobos, C.; González, J.; Acuña-Castillo, C.; Loeb, B.; Huidobro-Toro, J.P. Formation of Carnosine-Cu(II) Complexes Prevents and Reverts the Inhibitory Action of Copper in P2X 4 and P2X 7 Receptors. J. Neurochem. 2002, 80, 626–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Mizuno, D.; Konoha-Mizuno, K.; Mori, M.; Sadakane, Y.; Koyama, H.; Ohkawara, S.; Kawahara, M. Protective Activity of Carnosine and Anserine against Zinc-Induced Neurotoxicity: A Possible Treatment for Vascular Dementia. Metallomics 2015, 7, 1233–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Kawahara, M.; Sadakane, Y.; Mizuno, K.; Kato-Negishi, M.; Tanaka, K. Carnosine as a Possible Drug for Zinc-Induced Neurotoxicity and Vascular Dementia. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Pressman, B.C.; Harris, E.J.; Jagger, W.S.; Johnson, J.H. Antibiotic-Mediated Transport of Alkali Ions across Lipid Barriers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1967, 58, 1949–1956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Ding, W.; Lind, S.E. Metal Ionophores–An Emerging Class of Anticancer Drugs. IUBMB Life 2009, 61, 1013–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Steinbrueck, A.; Sedgwick, A.C.; Brewster, J.T.; Yan, K.-C.; Shang, Y.; Knoll, D.M.; Vargas-Zúñiga, G.I.; He, X.-P.; Tian, H.; Sessler, J.L. Transition Metal Chelators, pro-Chelators, and Ionophores as Small Molecule Cancer Chemotherapeutic Agents. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 3726–3747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Oliveri, V. Biomedical Applications of Copper Ionophores. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2020, 422, 213474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Williams, R.J.P. Chemical Selection of Elements by Cells. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2001, 216–217, 583–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Lutsenko, S. Sending Copper Where It Is Needed Most. Science 2020, 368, 584–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Szpunar, J. Metallomics: A New Frontier in Analytical Chemistry. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2004, 378, 54–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Trusso Sfrazzetto, G.; Satriano, C.; Tomaselli, G.A.; Rizzarelli, E. Synthetic Fluorescent Probes to Map Metallostasis and Intracellular Fate of Zinc and Copper. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2016, 311, 125–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. O’Halloran, T.V.; Culotta, V.C. Metallochaperones, an Intracellular Shuttle Service for Metal Ions. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 25057–25060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Nyquist, M.D.; Prasad, B.; Mostaghel, E.A. Harnessing Solute Carrier Transporters for Precision Oncology. Molecules 2017, 22, 539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Rutherford, J.C.; Bird, A.J. Metal-Responsive Transcription Factors That Regulate Iron, Zinc, and Copper Homeostasis in Eukaryotic Cells. Eukaryot. Cell 2004, 3, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Calvo, J.; Jung, H.; Meloni, G. Copper Metallothioneins. IUBMB Life 2017, 69, 236–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Sies, H. Glutathione and Its Role in Cellular Functions. Free. Radic. Biol. Med. 1999, 27, 916–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. La Mendola, D.; Giacomelli, C.; Rizzarelli, E. Intracellular Bioinorganic Chemistry and Cross Talk Among Different Omics. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2016, 16, 3103–3130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Kim, H.; Wu, X.; Lee, J. SLC31 (CTR) Family of Copper Transporters in Health and Disease. Mol. Asp. Med. 2013, 34, 561–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Nose, Y.; Kim, B.-E.; Thiele, D.J. Ctr1 Drives Intestinal Copper Absorption and Is Essential for Growth, Iron Metabolism, and Neonatal Cardiac Function. Cell Metab. 2006, 4, 235–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Lutsenko, S.; Roy, S.; Tsvetkov, P. Mammalian Copper Homeostasis: Physiological Roles and Molecular Mechanisms. Physiol. Rev. 2025, 105, 441–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Palumaa, P. Copper Chaperones. The Concept of Conformational Control in the Metabolism of Copper. FEBS Lett. 2013, 587, 1902–1910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Devi, S.R.B.; Dhivya, M.A.; Sulochana, K.N. Copper Transporters and Chaperones: Their Function on Angiogenesis and Cellular Signalling. J. Biosci. 2016, 41, 487–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Barca, A.; Ippati, S.; Urso, E.; Vetrugno, C.; Storelli, C.; Maffia, M.; Romano, A.; Verri, T. Carnosine Modulates the Sp1-Slc31a1/Ctr1 Copper-Sensing System and Influences Copper Homeostasis in Murine CNS-Derived Cells. Am. J. Physiol.-Cell Physiol. 2019, 316, C235–C245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Magrì, A.; Tomasello, B.; Naletova, I.; Tabbì, G.; Cairns, W.R.L.; Greco, V.; Sciuto, S.; La Mendola, D.; Rizzarelli, E. New BDNF and NT-3 Cyclic Mimetics Concur with Copper to Activate Trophic Signaling Pathways as Potential Molecular Entities to Protect Old Brains from Neurodegeneration. Biomolecules 2024, 14, 1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Greco, V.; Lanza, V.; Tomasello, B.; Naletova, I.; Cairns, W.R.L.; Sciuto, S.; Rizzarelli, E. Copper Complexes with New Glycyl-L-histidyl-L-lysine–Hyaluronan Conjugates Show Antioxidant Properties and Osteogenic and Angiogenic Synergistic Effects. Bioconjugate Chem. 2025, 36, 662–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Tomasello, B.; Bellia, F.; Naletova, I.; Magrì, A.; Tabbì, G.; Attanasio, F.; Tomasello, M.F.; Cairns, W.R.L.; Fortino, M.; Pietropaolo, A.; et al. BDNF- and VEGF-Responsive Stimulus to an NGF Mimic Cyclic Peptide with Copper Ionophore Capability and Ctr1/CCS-Driven Signaling. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2024, 15, 1755–1769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Schweigel-Röntgen, M. The Families of Zinc (SLC30 and SLC39) and Copper (SLC31) Transporters. In Current Topics in Membranes; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; Volume 73, pp. 321–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Bothwell, M. NGF, BDNF, NT3, and NT4. In Neurotrophic Factors. Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2014; Volume 220, pp. 3–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Yamashita, S.; Sato, M.; Matsumoto, T.; Kadooka, K.; Hasegawa, T.; Fujimura, T.; Katakura, Y. Mechanisms of Carnosine-Induced Activation of Neuronal Cells. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2018, 82, 683–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Steven, A.; Friedrich, M.; Jank, P.; Heimer, N.; Budczies, J.; Denkert, C.; Seliger, B. What Turns CREB on? And off? And Why Does It Matter? Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2020, 77, 4049–4067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Leibrock, J.; Lottspeich, F.; Hohn, A.; Hofer, M.; Hengerer, B.; Masiakowski, P.; Thoenen, H.; Barde, Y.A. Molecular Cloning and Expression of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor. Nature 1989, 341, 149–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Kadooka, K.; Fujii, K.; Matsumoto, T.; Sato, M.; Morimatsu, F.; Tashiro, K.; Kuhara, S.; Katakura, Y. Mechanisms and Consequences of Carnosine-Induced Activation of Intestinal Epithelial Cells. J. Funct. Foods 2015, 13, 32–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Fujii, K.; Abe, K.; Kadooka, K.; Matsumoto, T.; Katakura, Y. Carnosine Activates the CREB Pathway in Caco-2 Cells. Cytotechnology 2017, 69, 523–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Jones, K.R.; Fariñas, I.; Backus, C.; Reichardt, L.F. Targeted Disruption of the BDNF Gene Perturbs Brain and Sensory Neuron Development but Not Motor Neuron Development. Cell 1994, 76, 989–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Lindsay, R. Nerve Growth Factors (NGF, BDNF) Enhance Axonal Regeneration but Are Not Required for Survival of Adult Sensory Neurons. J. Neurosci. 1988, 8, 2394–2405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. McGregor, C.E.; English, A.W. The Role of BDNF in Peripheral Nerve Regeneration: Activity-Dependent Treatments and Val66Met. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2019, 12, 522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Miranda, M.; Morici, J.F.; Zanoni, M.B.; Bekinschtein, P. Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor: A Key Molecule for Memory in the Healthy and the Pathological Brain. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2019, 7, 363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Kaplan, D.R.; Miller, F.D. Neurotrophin Signal Transduction in the Nervous System. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2000, 10, 381–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Minichiello, L. TrkB Signalling Pathways in LTP and Learning. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2009, 10, 850–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Gonzalez, A.; Moya-Alvarado, G.; Gonzalez-Billaut, C.; Bronfman, F.C. Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms Regulating Neuronal Growth by Brain-derived Neurotrophic Factor. Cytoskeleton 2016, 73, 612–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Andreska, T.; Lüningschrör, P.; Sendtner, M. Regulation of TrkB Cell Surface Expression—A Mechanism for Modulation of Neuronal Responsiveness to Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor. Cell Tissue Res. 2020, 382, 5–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Kwon, M.; Fernandez, J.R.; Zegarek, G.F.; Lo, S.B.; Firestein, B.L. BDNF-Promoted Increases in Proximal Dendrites Occur via CREB-Dependent Transcriptional Regulation of Cypin. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31, 9735–9745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Travaglia, A.; Arena, G.; Fattorusso, R.; Isernia, C.; La Mendola, D.; Malgieri, G.; Nicoletti, V.G.; Rizzarelli, E. The Inorganic Perspective of Nerve Growth Factor: Interactions of Cu2+ and Zn2+ with the N-Terminus Fragment of Nerve Growth Factor Encompassing the Recognition Domain of the TrkA Receptor. Chem.–A Eur. J. 2011, 17, 3726–3738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Travaglia, A.; La Mendola, D.; Magrì, A.; Nicoletti, V.G.; Pietropaolo, A.; Rizzarelli, E. Copper, BDNF and Its N-terminal Domain: Inorganic Features and Biological Perspectives. Chem.–A Eur. J. 2012, 18, 15618–15631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Travaglia, A.; Pietropaolo, A.; Di Martino, R.; Nicoletti, V.G.; La Mendola, D.; Calissano, P.; Rizzarelli, E. A Small Linear Peptide Encompassing the NGF N-Terminus Partly Mimics the Biological Activities of the Entire Neurotrophin in PC12 Cells. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2015, 6, 1379–1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Naletova, I.; Satriano, C.; Pietropaolo, A.; Gianì, F.; Pandini, G.; Triaca, V.; Amadoro, G.; Latina, V.; Calissano, P.; Travaglia, A.; et al. The Copper(II)-Assisted Connection between NGF and BDNF by Means of Nerve Growth Factor-Mimicking Short Peptides. Cells 2019, 8, 301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Naletova, I.; Grasso, G.I.; Satriano, C.; Travaglia, A.; La Mendola, D.; Arena, G.; Rizzarelli, E. Copper Complexes of Synthetic Peptides Mimicking Neurotrophin-3 Enhance Neurite Outgrowth and CREB Phosphorylation. Metallomics 2019, 11, 1567–1578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Russo, L.; Giacomelli, C.; Fortino, M.; Marzo, T.; Ferri, G.; Calvello, M.; Viegi, A.; Magrì, A.; Pratesi, A.; Pietropaolo, A.; et al. Neurotrophic Activity and Its Modulation by Zinc Ion of a Dimeric Peptide Mimicking the Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor N-Terminal Region. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2022, 13, 3453–3463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Barthel, A.; Ostrakhovitch, E.A.; Walter, P.L.; Kampkötter, A.; Klotz, L.O. Stimulation of Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase/Akt Signaling by Copper and Zinc Ions: Mechanisms and Consequences. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2007, 463, 175–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Turski, M.L.; Brady, D.C.; Kim, H.J.; Kim, B.-E.; Nose, Y.; Counter, C.M.; Winge, D.R.; Thiele, D.J. A Novel Role for Copper in Ras/Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Signaling. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2012, 32, 1284–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Grasso, M.; Bond, G.J.; Kim, Y.-J.; Boyd, S.; Matson Dzebo, M.; Valenzuela, S.; Tsang, T.; Schibrowsky, N.A.; Alwan, K.B.; Blackburn, N.J.; et al. The Copper Chaperone CCS Facilitates Copper Binding to MEK1/2 to Promote Kinase Activation. J. Biol. Chem. 2021, 297, 101314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Tsai, C.Y.; Finley, J.C.; Ali, S.S.; Patel, H.H.; Howell, S.B. Copper Influx Transporter 1 Is Required for FGF, PDGF and EGF-Induced MAPK Signaling. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2012, 84, 1007–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Park, K.H.; Choi, Y.; Yoon, D.S.; Lee, K.-M.; Kim, D.; Lee, J.W. Zinc Promotes Osteoblast Differentiation in Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells Via Activation of the CAMP-PKA-CREB Signaling Pathway. Stem Cells Dev. 2018, 27, 1125–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Grubman, A.; White, A.R. Copper as a Key Regulator of Cell Signalling Pathways. Expert Rev. Mol. Med. 2014, 16, e11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Kardos, J.; Héja, L.; Simon, Á.; Jablonkai, I.; Kovács, R.; Jemnitz, K. Copper Signalling: Causes and Consequences. Cell Commun. Signal. 2018, 16, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Ackerman, C.M.; Chang, C.J. Copper Signaling in the Brain and Beyond. J. Biol. Chem. 2018, 293, 4628–4635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Zischka, H.; Kroemer, G. Copper–a Novel Stimulator of Autophagy. Cell Stress 2020, 4, 92–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Bellia, F.; Calabrese, V.; Guarino, F.; Cavallaro, M.; Cornelius, C.; De Pinto, V.; Rizzarelli, E. Carnosinase Levels in Aging Brain: Redox State Induction and Cellular Stress Response. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2009, 11, 2759–2775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Regazzoni, L. State of the Art in the Development of Human Serum Carnosinase Inhibitors. Molecules 2024, 29, 2488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Lanza, V.; Bellia, F.; D’Agata, R.; Grasso, G.; Rizzarelli, E.; Vecchio, G. New Glycoside Derivatives of Carnosine and Analogs Resistant to Carnosinase Hydrolysis: Synthesis and Characterization of Their Copper(II) Complexes. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2011, 105, 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Grasso, G.I.; Arena, G.; Bellia, F.; Rizzarelli, E.; Vecchio, G. Copper(II)-Chelating Homocarnosine Glycoconjugate as a New Multifunctional Compound. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2014, 131, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Bellia, F.; Amorini, A.M.; La Mendola, D.; Vecchio, G.; Tavazzi, B.; Giardina, B.; Di Pietro, V.; Lazzarino, G.; Rizzarelli, E. New Glycosidic Derivatives of Histidine-Containing Dipeptides with Antioxidant Properties and Resistant to Carnosinase Activity. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 43, 373–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Lanza, V.; Greco, V.; Bocchieri, E.; Sciuto, S.; Inturri, R.; Messina, L.; Vaccaro, S.; Bellia, F.; Rizzarelli, E. Synergistic Effect of L-Carnosine and Hyaluronic Acid in Their Covalent Conjugates on the Antioxidant Abilities and the Mutual Defense against Enzymatic Degradation. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Naletova, I.; Greco, V.; Sciuto, S.; Attanasio, F.; Rizzarelli, E. Ionophore Ability of Carnosine and Its Trehalose Conjugate Assists Copper Signal in Triggering Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Activation In Vitro. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 13504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Grasso, G.I.; Bellia, F.; Arena, G.; Satriano, C.; Vecchio, G.; Rizzarelli, E. Multitarget Trehalose-Carnosine Conjugates Inhibit Aβ Aggregation, Tune Copper(II) Activity and Decrease Acrolein Toxicity. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 28, 447–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Zachary, I. Neuroprotective Role of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor: Signalling Mechanisms, Biological Function, and Therapeutic Potential. Neurosignals 2005, 14, 207–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. D’Andrea, L.D.; Romanelli, A.; Di Stasi, R.; Pedone, C. Bioinorganic Aspects of Angiogenesis. Dalton Trans. 2010, 39, 7625–7636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Claesson-Welsh, L. Signal Transduction by Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptors. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2003, 31, 20–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Deyama, S.; Bang, E.; Kato, T.; Li, X.-Y.; Duman, R.S. Neurotrophic and Antidepressant Actions of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Require Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor. Biol. Psychiatry 2019, 86, 143–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Naletova, I.; Attanasio, F.; Sibillano, T.; Tomasello, B.; Lanza, V.; Ciaffaglione, V.; Tosto, R.; Mio, A.; Cairns, W.; Giannini, C.; et al. Carnosine Biofunctionalized Hydroxyapatite Induces Copper-Driven Osteogenesis and Angiogenesis, Strengthening Its Bone Regenerative Capacities. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2025, 11, 5878–5894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Pickart, L.; Thayer, L.; Thaler, M.M. A Synthetic Tripeptide Which Increases Survival of Normal Liver Cells, and Stimulates Growth in Hepatoma Cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1973, 54, 562–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Lane, T.F.; Iruela-Arispe, M.L.; Johnson, R.S.; Sage, E.H. SPARC Is a Source of Copper-Binding Peptides That Stimulate Angiogenesis. J. Cell Biol. 1994, 125, 929–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Lau, S.J.; Sarkar, B. The Interaction of Copper(II) and Glycyl-L-Histidyl-L-Lysine, a Growth-Modulating Tripeptide from Plasma. Biochem. J. 1981, 199, 649–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Pickart, L.; Freedman, J.H.; Loker, W.J.; Peisach, J.; Perkins, C.M.; Stenkamp, R.E.; Weinstein, B. Growth-Modulating Plasma Tripeptide May Function by Facilitating Copper Uptake into Cells. Nature 1980, 288, 715–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Pickart, L. The Use of Glycylhistidyllysine in Culture Systems. Vitro 1981, 17, 459–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Beretta, G.; Artali, R.; Regazzoni, L.; Panigati, M.; Facino, R.M. Glycyl-Histidyl-Lysine (GHK) Is a Quencher of α,β-4-Hydroxy- Trans -2-Nonenal: A Comparison with Carnosine. Insights into the Mechanism of Reaction by Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry, 1 H NMR, and Computational Techniques. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2007, 20, 1309–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Beretta, G.; Arlandini, E.; Artali, R.; Anton, J.M.G.; Maffei Facino, R. Acrolein Sequestering Ability of the Endogenous Tripeptide Glycyl-Histidyl-Lysine (GHK): Characterization of Conjugation Products by ESI-MSn and Theoretical Calculations. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2008, 47, 596–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  199. Maquart, F.X.; Bellon, G.; Chaqour, B.; Wegrowski, J.; Patt, L.M.; Trachy, R.E.; Monboisse, J.C.; Chastang, F.; Birembaut, P.; Gillery, P. In Vivo Stimulation of Connective Tissue Accumulation by the Tripeptide-Copper Complex Glycyl-L-histidyl-L-lysine-Cu2+ in Rat Experimental Wounds. J. Clin. Investig. 1993, 92, 2368–2376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Siméon, A.; Emonard, H.; Hornebeck, W.; Maquart, F.-X. The Tripeptide-Copper Complex Glycyl-L-histidyl-L- lysine-Cu2+ Stimulates Matrix Metalloproteinase-2 Expression by Fibroblast Cultures. Life Sci. 2000, 67, 2257–2265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Siméon, A.; Wegrowski, Y.; Bontemps, Y.; Maquart, F.X. Expression of Glycosaminoglycans and Small Proteoglycans in Wounds: Modulation by the Tripeptide-Copper Complex Glycyl-L-histidyl-L-lysine-Cu2+. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2000, 115, 962–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  202. Maquart, F.-X.; Pickart, L.; Laurent, M.; Gillery, P.; Monboisse, J.-C.; Borel, J.-P. Stimulation of Collagen Synthesis in Fibroblast Cultures by the Tripeptide-copper Complex Glycyl-L-histidyl-L-lysine-Cu2+. FEBS Lett. 1988, 238, 343–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  203. Ahmed, M.R.; Basha, S.H.; Gopinath, D.; Muthusamy, R.; Jayakumar, R. Initial Upregulation of Growth Factors and Inflammatory Mediators during Nerve Regeneration in the Presence of Cell Adhesive Peptide-incorporated Collagen Tubes. J. Peripher. Nerv. Syst. 2005, 10, 17–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Jose, S.; Hughbanks, M.L.; Binder, B.Y.K.; Ingavle, G.C.; Leach, J.K. Enhanced Trophic Factor Secretion by Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells with Glycine-Histidine-Lysine (GHK)-Modified Alginate Hydrogels. Acta Biomater. 2014, 10, 1955–1964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Pickart, L.; Vasquez-Soltero, J.M.; Margolina, A. GHK Peptide as a Natural Modulator of Multiple Cellular Pathways in Skin Regeneration. BioMed Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 648108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Steiling, H.; Werner, S. Fibroblast Growth Factors: Key Players in Epithelial Morphogenesis, Repair and Cytoprotection. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2003, 14, 533–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Pollard, J.D.; Quan, S.; Kang, T.; Koch, R.J. Effects of Copper Tripeptide on the Growth and Expression of Growth Factors by Normal and Irradiated Fibroblasts. Arch. Facial Plast. Surg. 2005, 7, 27–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  208. Wang, X.; Liu, B.; Xu, Q.; Sun, H.; Shi, M.; Wang, D.; Guo, M.; Yu, J.; Zhao, C.; Feng, B. GHK-Cu-Liposomes Accelerate Scald Wound Healing in Mice by Promoting Cell Proliferation and Angiogenesis. Wound Repair Regen. 2017, 25, 270–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Pickart, L. The Human Tri-Peptide GHK and Tissue Remodeling. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2008, 19, 969–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Pohunková, H.; Stehlík, J.; Váchal, J.; Čech, O.; Adam, M. Morphological Features of Bone Healing under the Effect of Collagen-Graft-Glycosaminoglycan Copolymer Supplemented with the Tripeptide Gly-His-Lys. Biomaterials 1996, 17, 1567–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Choi, H.-R.; Kang, Y.-A.; Ryoo, S.-J.; Shin, J.-W.; Na, J.-I.; Huh, C.-H.; Park, K.-C. Stem Cell Recovering Effect of Copper-free GHK in Skin. J. Pept. Sci. 2012, 18, 685–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  212. Zhang, Q.; Yan, L.; Lu, J.; Zhou, X. Glycyl-L-Histidyl-L-Lysine-Cu2+ Attenuates Cigarette Smoke-Induced Pulmonary Emphysema and Inflammation by Reducing Oxidative Stress Pathway. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2022, 22, 925700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Ma, W.-H.; Li, M.; Ma, H.-F.; Li, W.; Liu, L.; Yin, Y.; Zhou, X.-M.; Hou, G. Protective Effects of GHK-Cu in Bleomycin-Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis via Anti-Oxidative Stress and Anti-Inflammation Pathways. Life Sci. 2020, 15, 117139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Pickart, L.; Vasquez-Soltero, J.M.; Margolina, A. The Human Tripeptide GHK-Cu in Prevention of Oxidative Stress and Degenerative Conditions of Aging: Implications for Cognitive Health. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2012, 2012, 324832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Lamb, J. The Connectivity Map: A New Tool for Biomedical Research. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2007, 7, 54–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Fischer, A.; Sananbenesi, F.; Mungenast, A.; Tsai, L.H. Targeting the Correct HDAC(s) to Treat Cognitive Disorders. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2010, 31, 605–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  217. Pickart, L.; Vasquez-Soltero, J.M.; Margolina, A. The Effect of the Human Peptide GHK on Gene Expression Relevant to Nervous System Function and Cognitive Decline. Brain Sci. 2017, 7, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  218. Rosenfeld, M.; Nickel, K.; Ladiges, W. GHK Peptide Prevents Sleep Deprived Learning Impairment in Aging Mice. Aging Pathobiol. Ther. 2023, 5, 33–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  219. Oakley, H.; Cole, S.L.; Logan, S.; Maus, E.; Shao, P.; Craft, J.; Guillozet-Bongaarts, A.; Ohno, M.; Disterhoft, J.; Van Eldik, L.; et al. Intraneuronal β-Amyloid Aggregates, Neurodegeneration, and Neuron Loss in Transgenic Mice with Five Familial Alzheimer’s Disease Mutations: Potential Factors in Amyloid Plaque Formation. J. Neurosci. 2006, 26, 10129–10140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Younkin, S.G. The Role of Aβ42 in Alzheimer’s Disease. J. Physiol.-Paris 1998, 92, 289–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Zhang, L.; Li, J.; Lin, A. Assessment of Neurodegeneration and Neuronal Loss in Aged 5XFAD Mice. STAR Protoc. 2021, 2, 100915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Sokolova, A.; Hill, M.D.; Rahimi, F.; Warden, L.A.; Halliday, G.M.; Shepherd, C.E. Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 Plays a Dominant Role in the Chronic Inflammation Observed in Alzheimer’s Disease. Brain Pathol. 2009, 19, 392–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Dalpozzo, A.; Kanai, K.; Kereszturi, G.; Calabrese, G. H-Gly-Hisψ(NHCO)Lys-OH, Partially Modified Retro-inverso Analogue of the Growth Factor Glycyl-L-histidyl-L-lysine with Enhanced Enzymatic Stability. Int. J. Pept. Protein Res. 1993, 41, 561–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  224. Conato, C.; Gavioli, R.; Guerrini, R.; Kozlowski, H.; Mlynarz, P.; Pasti, C.; Pulidori, F.; Remelli, M. Copper Complexes of Glycyl-Histidyl-Lysine and Two of Its Synthetic Analogues: Chemical Behaviour and Biological Activity. Biochim. Biophys. Acta-Gen. Subj. 2001, 1526, 199–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Wang, Y.; Lin, J.; Yu, Z.; Cheng, J.; Cheng, J.; Cui, W. Rigid-Flexible Nanocarriers Loaded with Active Peptides for Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Applications in Skin. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2024, 236, 113772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Ogórek, K.; Nowak, K.; Wadych, E.; Ruzik, L.; Timerbaev, A.R.; Matczuk, M. Are We Ready to Measure Skin Permeation of Modern Antiaging GHK–Cu Tripeptide Encapsulated in Liposomes? Molecules 2025, 30, 136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Castro, V.I.B.; Araújo, A.R.; Reis, R.L.; Pashkuleva, I.; Pires, R.A. Nanoengineered Self-Assembling Peptides with Increased Proteolytic Stability Promote Wound Healing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2025, 17, 11624–11633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Kawase, M.; Kurikawa, N.; Higashiyama, S.; Miura, N.; Shiomi, T.; Ozawa, C.; Mizoguchi, T.; Yagi, K. Effectiveness of Polyamidoamine Dendrimers Modified with Tripeptide Growth Factor, Glycyl-L-histidyl-L-lysine, for Enhancement of Function of Hepatoma Cells. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 1999, 88, 433–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Kawase, M.; Miura, N.; Kurikawa, N.; Masuda, K.; Higashiyama, S.; Yagi, K.; Mizoguchi, T. Immobilization of Tripepride Growth Factor Glycyl-L-Histidyl-L-Lysine on Poly(Vinylalcohol)-Quarternized Stilbazole (PVA-SbQ) and Its Use as a Ligand for Hepatocyte Attachment. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 1999, 22, 999–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  230. Tosto, R.; Vecchio, G.; Bellia, F. New Biotinylated GHK and Related Copper(II) Complex: Antioxidant and Antiglycant Properties In Vitro against Neurodegenerative Disorders. Molecules 2023, 28, 6724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Klontzas, M.E.; Reakasame, S.; Silva, R.; Morais, J.C.F.; Vernardis, S.; MacFarlane, R.J.; Heliotis, M.; Tsiridis, E.; Panoskaltsis, N.; Boccaccini, A.R.; et al. Oxidized Alginate Hydrogels with the GHK Peptide Enhance Cord Blood Mesenchymal Stem Cell Osteogenesis: A Paradigm for Metabolomics-Based Evaluation of Biomaterial Design. Acta Biomater. 2019, 1, 224–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Meyer, K.; Palmer, J.W. The polysaccharide of the vitreous humor. J. Biol. Chem. 1934, 107, 629–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Hong, B.M.; Park, S.A.; Park, W.H. Effect of Photoinitiator on Chain Degradation of Hyaluronic Acid. Biomater. Res. 2019, 23, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  234. Choi, K.Y.; Han, H.S.; Lee, E.S.; Shin, J.M.; Almquist, B.D.; Lee, D.S.; Park, J.H. Hyaluronic Acid–Based Activatable Nanomaterials for Stimuli-Responsive Imaging and Therapeutics: Beyond CD44-Mediated Drug Delivery. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, e1803549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  235. Kotla, N.G.; Mohd Isa, I.L.; Larrañaga, A.; Maddiboyina, B.; Swamy, S.K.; Sivaraman, G.; Vemula, P.K. Hyaluronic Acid-Based Bioconjugate Systems, Scaffolds, and Their Therapeutic Potential. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2023, 12, e2203104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Elbein, A.D. New Insights on Trehalose: A Multifunctional Molecule. Glycobiology 2003, 13, 17R–27R. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Guo, Z.; Li, M.; Guo, Z.; Zhu, R.; Xin, Y.; Gu, Z.; Zhang, L. Trehalose Metabolism Targeting as a Novel Strategy to Modulate Acid Tolerance of Yeasts and Its Application in Food Industry. Food Microbiol. 2023, 114, 104300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Chen, A.; Tapia, H.; Goddard, J.M.; Gibney, P.A. Trehalose and Its Applications in the Food Industry. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2022, 21, 5004–5037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Maruf, A.; Milewska, M.; Dudzisz, K.; Lalik, A.; Student, S.; Salvati, A.; Wandzik, I. Trehalose-Releasing Nanogels: Study on Trehalose Release and Insights into Selected Biologically Relevant Aspects. Biomacromolecules 2025, 26, 2835–2851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Hassan, L.F.; Sen, R.; O’Shea, T.M. Trehalose-Based Coacervates for Local Bioactive Protein Delivery to the Central Nervous System. Biomaterials 2024, 309, 122594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  241. Kaur, A.; Singh, S.; Sharma, S.C. Unlocking Trehalose’s Versatility: A Comprehensive Journey from Biosynthesis to Therapeutic Applications. Exp. Cell Res. 2024, 442, 114250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Nazari-Robati, M.; Akbari, M.; Khaksari, M.; Mirzaee, M. Trehalose Attenuates Spinal Cord Injury through the Regulation of Oxidative Stress, Inflammation and GFAP Expression in Rats. J. Spinal Cord Med. 2019, 42, 387–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  243. Lee, H.S. Entry Modes of Foreign Direct Investment and Industry Demand for Trade Protection. Transnatl. Corp. Rev. 2018, 10, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  244. Assoni, G.; Frapporti, G.; Colombo, E.; Gornati, D.; Perez-Carrion, M.D.; Polito, L.; Seneci, P.; Piccoli, G.; Arosio, D. Trehalose-Based Neuroprotective Autophagy Inducers. Bioorganic Med. Chem. Lett. 2021, 40, 127929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  245. Liu, R.; Barkhordarian, H.; Emadi, S.; Park, C.; Sierks, M. Trehalose Differentially Inhibits Aggregation and Neurotoxicity of Beta-Amyloid 40 and 42. Neurobiol. Dis. 2005, 20, 74–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  246. Tanaka, M.; Machida, Y.; Niu, S.; Ikeda, T.; Jana, N.R.; Doi, H.; Kurosawa, M.; Nekooki, M.; Nukina, N. Trehalose Alleviates Polyglutamine-Mediated Pathology in a Mouse Model of Huntington Disease. Nat. Med. 2004, 10, 148–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  247. Yu, W.B.; Jiang, T.; Lan, D.M.; Lu, J.H.; Yue, Z.Y.; Wang, J.; Zhou, P. Trehalose Inhibits Fibrillation of A53T Mutant Alpha-Synuclein and Disaggregates Existing Fibrils. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2012, 523, 144–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  248. Benaroudj, N.; Lee, D.H.; Goldberg, A.L. Trehalose Accumulation during Cellular Stress Protects Cells and Cellular Proteins from Damage by Oxygen Radicals. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 24261–24267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  249. Mizunoe, Y.; Kobayashi, M.; Sudo, Y.; Watanabe, S.; Yasukawa, H.; Natori, D.; Hoshino, A.; Negishi, A.; Okita, N.; Komatsu, M.; et al. Trehalose Protects against Oxidative Stress by Regulating the Keap1–Nrf2 and Autophagy Pathways. Redox Biol. 2018, 15, 115–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  250. Sun, L.; Zhao, Q.; Xiao, Y.; Liu, X.; Li, Y.; Zhang, J.; Pan, J.; Zhang, Z. Trehalose Targets Nrf2 Signal to Alleviate D-Galactose Induced Aging and Improve Behavioral Ability. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2020, 521, 113–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  251. Crowe, J.H. Trehalose As a “Chemical Chaperone”. In Molecular Aspects of the Stress Response: Chaperones, Membranes and Networks; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2007; Volume 594, pp. 143–158. [Google Scholar]
  252. Taya, K.; Hirose, K.; Hamada, S. Trehalose Inhibits Inflammatory Cytokine Production by Protecting IκB-α Reduction in Mouse Peritoneal Macrophages. Arch. Oral Biol. 2009, 54, 749–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  253. Yu, S.; Park, H.; Kim, W. Trehalose Inhibits Inflammatory Responses through Mitochondrial Reprogramming in RAW 264.7 Macrophages. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  254. Li, Y.; Lei, Z.; Ritzel, R.M.; He, J.; Li, H.; Choi, H.M.C.; Lipinski, M.M.; Wu, J. Impairment of Autophagy after Spinal Cord Injury Potentiates Neuroinflammation and Motor Function Deficit in Mice. Theranostics 2022, 12, 5364–5388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  255. Yun, U.J.; Sung, J.Y.; Park, S.Y.; Ye, S.K.; Shim, J.; Lee, J.S.; Hibi, M.; Bae, Y.K.; Kim, Y.N. Oncogenic Role of Rab Escort Protein 1 through EGFR and STAT3 Pathway. Cell Death Dis. 2017, 8, e2621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  256. Sarkar, S.; Davies, J.E.; Huang, Z.; Tunnacliffe, A.; Rubinsztein, D.C. Trehalose, a Novel MTOR-Independent Autophagy Enhancer, Accelerates the Clearance of Mutant Huntingtin and α-Synuclein. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 5641–5652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  257. Cai, L.; Yoon, J.D.; Hwang, S.U.; Lee, J.; Kim, E.; Kim, M.; Hyun, S.Y.; Choi, H.; Oh, D.; Jeon, Y.; et al. Exploring the Mechanism of Trehalose: Dual Functions of PI3K/Akt and VPS34/MTOR Pathways in Porcine Oocytes and Cumulus Cells. Biol. Reprod. 2022, 107, 432–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  258. Del Bello, B.; Gamberucci, A.; Marcolongo, P.; Maellaro, E. The Autophagy Inducer Trehalose Stimulates Macropinocytosis in NF1-Deficient Glioblastoma Cells. Cancer Cell Int. 2022, 22, 232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  259. Rusmini, P.; Cortese, K.; Crippa, V.; Cristofani, R.; Cicardi, M.E.; Ferrari, V.; Vezzoli, G.; Tedesco, B.; Meroni, M.; Messi, E.; et al. Trehalose Induces Autophagy via Lysosomal-Mediated TFEB Activation in Models of Motoneuron Degeneration. Autophagy 2019, 15, 631–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  260. Zhang, X.W.; Zhu, X.X.; Tang, D.S.; Lu, J.H. Targeting Autophagy in Alzheimer’s Disease: Animal Models and Mechanisms. Zool. Res. 2023, 44, 1132–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  261. Nechushtai, L.; Frenkel, D.; Pinkas-Kramarski, R. Autophagy in Parkinson’s Disease. Biomolecules 2023, 13, 1435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  262. Ren, H.; Hao, Z.; Wang, G. Autophagy and Polyglutamine Disease. In Autophagy: Biology and Diseases; Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology; Springer: Singapore, 2020; Volume 1207, pp. 149–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  263. Ghorbani, M.; Abouei Mehrizi, M.; Tajvidi, M.; Amin Habibi, M.; Mohammadi, M.; Esmaeilian, S.; Torabi, P.; Rahmanipour, E.; Daskareh, M.; Mohammadi, A. Trehalose: A Promising New Treatment for Traumatic Brain Injury? A Systematic Review of Animal Evidence. Interdiscip. Neurosurg. 2024, 36, 101947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  264. Debenedictis, C.A.; Raab, A.; Ducie, E.; Howley, S.; Feldmann, J.; Grabrucker, A.M. Concentrations of Essential Trace Metals in the Brain of Animal Species—A Comparative Study. Brain Sci. 2020, 10, 460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  265. Lei, P.; Ayton, S.; Bush, A.I. The Essential Elements of Alzheimer’s Disease. J. Biol. Chem. 2021, 296, 100105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  266. Wang, B.; Fang, T.; Chen, H. Zinc and Central Nervous System Disorders. Nutrients 2023, 15, 2140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  267. Agostini, F.; Sgalletta, B.; Bisaglia, M. Iron Dyshomeostasis in Neurodegeneration with Brain Iron Accumulation (NBIA): Is It the Cause or the Effect? Cells 2024, 13, 1376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  268. Portbury, S.D.; Hare, D.J.; Finkelstein, D.I.; Adlard, P.A. Trehalose Improves Traumatic Brain Injury-Induced Cognitive Impairment. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0183683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  269. Portbury, S.D.; Hare, D.J.; Bishop, D.P.; Finkelstein, D.I.; Doble, P.A.; Adlard, P.A. Trehalose Elevates Brain Zinc Levels Following Controlled Cortical Impact in a Mouse Model of Traumatic Brain Injury. Metallomics 2018, 10, 846–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  270. Lee, H.J.; Yoon, Y.S.; Lee, S.J. Mechanism of Neuroprotection by Trehalose: Controversy Surrounding Autophagy Induction. Cell Death Dis. 2018, 9, 712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  271. Pereira, H.; Sousa, D.A.; Cunha, A.; Andrade, R.; Espregueira-Mendes, J.; Oliveira, J.M.; Reis, R.L. Hyaluronic Acid. In Osteochondral Tissue Engineering; Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; Volume 1059, pp. 137–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  272. Gallo, N.; Nasser, H.; Salvatore, L.; Natali, M.L.; Campa, L.; Mahmoud, M.; Capobianco, L.; Sannino, A.; Madaghiele, M. Hyaluronic Acid for Advanced Therapies: Promises and Challenges. Eur. Polym. J. 2019, 117, 134–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  273. Necas, J.; Bartosikova, L.; Brauner, P.; Kolar, J. Hyaluronic Acid (Hyaluronan): A Review. Veterinární Medicína 2008, 53, 397–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  274. Fraser, J.R.E.; Laurent, T.C.; Laurent, U.B.G. Hyaluronan: Its Nature, Distribution, Functions and Turnover. J. Intern. Med. 1997, 242, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  275. Conrozier, T.; Raman, R.; Chevalier, X.; Henrotin, Y.; Monfort, J.; Diraçoglù, D.; Bard, H.; Baron, D.; Jerosch, J.; Richette, P.; et al. Viscosupplementation for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis. The Contribution of EUROVISCO Group. Ther. Adv. Musculoskelet. Dis. 2021, 13, 1759720X211018605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  276. Weigel, P.H.; Hascall, V.C.; Tammi, M. Hyaluronan Synthases. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 13997–14000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  277. Siiskonen, H.; Oikari, S.; Pasonen-Seppänen, S.; Rilla, K. Hyaluronan Synthase 1: A Mysterious Enzyme with Unexpected Functions. Front. Immunol. 2015, 6, 42–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  278. Qiu, Y.; Ma, Y.; Huang, Y.; Li, S.; Xu, H.; Su, E. Current Advances in the Biosynthesis of Hyaluronic Acid with Variable Molecular Weights. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 1, 118320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  279. Snetkov, P.; Zakharova, K.; Morozkina, S.; Olekhnovich, R.; Uspenskaya, M. Hyaluronic Acid: The Influence of Molecular Weight on Structural, Physical, Physico-Chemical, and Degradable Properties of Biopolymer. Polymers 2020, 12, 1800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  280. Rayahin, J.E.; Buhrman, J.S.; Zhang, Y.; Koh, T.J.; Gemeinhart, R.A. High and Low Molecular Weight Hyaluronic Acid Differentially Influence Macrophage Activation. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2015, 1, 481–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  281. Iaconisi, G.N.; Lunetti, P.; Gallo, N.; Cappello, A.R.; Fiermonte, G.; Dolce, V.; Capobianco, L. Hyaluronic Acid: A Powerful Biomolecule with Wide-Ranging Applications—A Comprehensive Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 10296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  282. Campo, G.M.; Avenoso, A.; Campo, S.; D’Ascola, A.; Nastasi, G.; Calatroni, A. Molecular Size Hyaluronan Differently Modulates Toll-like Receptor-4 in LPS-Induced Inflammation in Mouse Chondrocytes. Biochimie 2010, 92, 204–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  283. Frenkel, J.S. The Role of Hyaluronan in Wound Healing. Int. Wound J. 2014, 11, 159–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  284. Burdick, J.A.; Prestwich, G.D. Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogels for Biomedical Applications. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, H41–H56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  285. Wang, Y.Z.; Cao, M.L.; Liu, Y.W.; He, Y.Q.; Yang, C.X.; Gao, F. CD44 Mediates Oligosaccharides of Hyaluronan-Induced Proliferation, Tube Formation and Signal Transduction in Endothelial Cells. Exp. Biol. Med. 2011, 236, 84–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  286. Ke, C.; Sun, L.; Qiao, D.; Wang, D.; Zeng, X. Antioxidant Acitivity of Low Molecular Weight Hyaluronic Acid. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2011, 49, 2670–2675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  287. Stern, R.; Jedrzejas, M.J. Hyaluronidases: Their genomics, structures, and mechanisms of action. Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 818–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  288. Kaul, A.; Short, W.D.; Wang, X.; Keswani, S.G. Hyaluronidases in Human Diseases. Int. J. Mol Sci. 2021, 22, 3204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  289. Weng, X.; Maxwell-Warburton, S.; Hasib, A.; Ma, L.; Kang, L. The Membrane Receptor CD44: Novel Insights into Metabolism. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2022, 33, 318–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  290. Toole, B.P. Hyaluronan and Its Binding Proteins, the Hyaladherins. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 1990, 2, 839–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  291. Šoltés, L.; Mendichi, R.; Kogan, G.; Schiller, J.; Stankovská, M.; Arnhold, J. Degradative Action of Reactive Oxygen Species on Hyaluronan. Biomacromolecules 2006, 7, 659–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  292. Parsons, B.J. Free Radical Studies of Components of the Extracellular Matrix: Contributions to Protection of Biomolecules and Biomaterials from Sterilising Doses of Ionising Radiation. Cell Tissue Bank. 2018, 19, 201–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  293. Greenwald, R.A.; Moy, W.W. Effect of Oxygen-derived Free Radicals on Hyaluronic Acid. Arthritis Rheum. 1980, 23, 455–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  294. Hrabarova, E.; Juranek, I.; Soltes, L. Pro-Oxidative Effect of Peroxynitrite Regarding Biological Systems: A Special Focus on High-Molar-Mass Hyaluronan Degradation. Gen. Physiol. Biophys. 2011, 30, 223–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  295. Yusupov, M.; Privat-Maldonado, A.; Cordeiro, R.M.; Verswyvel, H.; Shaw, P.; Razzokov, J.; Smits, E.; Bogaerts, A. Oxidative Damage to Hyaluronan–CD44 Interactions as an Underlying Mechanism of Action of Oxidative Stress-Inducing Cancer Therapy. Redox Biol. 2021, 43, 101968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  296. Berdiaki, A.; Neagu, M.; Spyridaki, I.; Kuskov, A.; Perez, S.; Nikitovic, D. Hyaluronan and Reactive Oxygen Species Signaling—Novel Cues from the Matrix? Antioxidants 2023, 12, 824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  297. Gu, J.; Chen, X.; Ren, X.; Zhang, X.; Fang, X.; Sha, X. CD44-Targeted Hyaluronic Acid-Coated Redox-Responsive Hyperbranched Poly(Amido Amine)/Plasmid DNA Ternary Nanoassemblies for Efficient Gene Delivery. Bioconjugate Chem. 2016, 27, 1723–1736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  298. Amorim, S.; da Costa, D.S.; Freitas, D.; Reis, C.A.; Reis, R.L.; Pashkuleva, I.; Pires, R.A. Molecular Weight of Surface Immobilized Hyaluronic Acid Influences CD44-Mediated Binding of Gastric Cancer Cells. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 16058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  299. Queisser, K.A.; Mellema, R.A.; Petrey, A.C. Hyaluronan and Its Receptors as Regulatory Molecules of the Endothelial Interface. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2021, 69, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  300. Nikitovic, D.; Kouvidi, K.; Kavasi, R.-M.; Berdiaki, A.; Tzanakakis, G.N. Hyaluronan/Hyaladherins-a Promising Axis for Targeted Drug Delivery in Cancer. Curr. Drug Deliv. 2016, 13, 500–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  301. Pauloin, T.; Dutot, M.; Joly, F.; Warnet, J.-M.; Rat, P. High Molecular Weight Hyaluronan Decreases UVB-Induced Apoptosis and Inflammation in Human Epithelial Corneal Cells. Mol. Vis. 2009, 15, 577–583. [Google Scholar]
  302. Shinn, J.; Park, S.; Lee, S.; Park, N.; Kim, S.; Hwang, S.; Moon, J.J.; Kwon, Y.; Lee, Y. Antioxidative Hyaluronic Acid–Bilirubin Nanomedicine Targeting Activated Hepatic Stellate Cells for Anti-Hepatic-Fibrosis Therapy. ACS Nano 2024, 18, 4704–4716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  303. Romo, M.; López-Vicario, C.; Pérez-Romero, N.; Casulleras, M.; Martínez-Puchol, A.I.; Sánchez, B.; Flores-Costa, R.; Alcaraz-Quiles, J.; Duran-Güell, M.; Ibarzábal, A.; et al. Small Fragments of Hyaluronan Are Increased in Individuals with Obesity and Contribute to Low-Grade Inflammation through TLR-Mediated Activation of Innate Immune Cells. Int. J. Obes. 2022, 46, 1960–1969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  304. Zhang, Y.; Wang, L.; Shi, Y.; Cheng, D.; Zhu, D.; Mi, Z.; Dang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, X.; Fan, H. Using Network Pharmacology to Fabricate Crosslinked Hyaluronan–Chondroitin Sulphate-Resveratrol Composite Hydrogels for Cartilage Regeneration. Biomed. Mater. 2023, 18, 055013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  305. Lu, B.; Zhao, S.; Zhang, J.; Zhan, J.; Zhang, J.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, J. Anti-Inflammatory and Antioxidant Effects on Skin Based on Supramolecular Hyaluronic Acid–Ectoin. J. Mater. Chem. B 2024, 12, 8408–8419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  306. Chen, L.H.; Xue, J.F.; Zheng, Z.Y.; Shuhaidi, M.; Thu, H.E.; Hussain, Z. Hyaluronic Acid, an Efficient Biomacromolecule for Treatment of Inflammatory Skin and Joint Diseases: A Review of Recent Developments and Critical Appraisal of Preclinical and Clinical Investigations. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 116, 572–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  307. Karbownik, M.S.; Nowak, J.Z. Hyaluronan: Towards Novel Anti-Cancer Therapeutics. Pharmacol. Rep. 2013, 65, 1056–1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  308. Marinho, A.; Nunes, C.; Reis, S. Hyaluronic Acid: A Key Ingredient in the Therapy of Inflammation. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  309. Gupta, R.C.; Lall, R.; Srivastava, A.; Sinha, A. Hyaluronic Acid: Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Trajectory. Front. Vet. Sci. 2019, 25, 192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  310. Domingues, R.M.A.; Silva, M.; Gershovich, P.; Betta, S.; Babo, P.; Caridade, S.G.; Mano, J.F.; Motta, A.; Reis, R.L.; Gomes, M.E. Development of Injectable Hyaluronic Acid/Cellulose Nanocrystals Bionanocomposite Hydrogels for Tissue Engineering Applications. Bioconjugate Chem. 2015, 26, 1571–1581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  311. Valachová, K.; Mach, M.; Šoltés, L. Oxidative Degradation of High-Molar-Mass Hyaluronan: Effects of Some Indole Derivatives to Hyaluronan Decay. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  312. Dráfi, F.; Bauerová, K.; Valachová, K.; Poništ, S.; Mihalová, D.; Juránek, I.; Boldyrev, A.; Hrabárova, E.; Šoltés, L. Carnosine Inhibits Degradation of Hyaluronan Induced by Free Radical Processes in Vitro and Improves the Redox Imbalance in Adjuvant Arthritis in Vivo. Neuroendocrinol. Lett. 2010, 2, 96–100. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  313. Tamura, T.; Higuchi, Y.; Kitamura, H.; Murao, N.; Saitoh, R.; Morikawa, T.; Sato, H. Novel Hyaluronic Acid–Methotrexate Conjugate Suppresses Joint Inflammation in the Rat Knee: Efficacy and Safety Evaluation in Two Rat Arthritis Models. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2016, 18, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  314. Poništ, S.; Slovák, L.; Kuncírová, V.; Fedorova, T.; Logvinenko, A.; Muzychuk, O.; Mihalová, D.; Bauerová, K. Inhibition of Oxidative Stress in Brain during Rat Adjuvant Arthritis by Carnosine, Trolox and Novel Trolox-Carnosine. Physiol. Res. 2015, 64, S489–S496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  315. Paterniti, I.; Filippone, A.; Naletova, I.; Greco, V.; Sciuto, S.; Esposito, E.; Cuzzocrea, S.; Rizzarelli, E. Trehalose–Carnosine Prevents the Effects of Spinal Cord Injury Through Regulating Acute Inflammation and Zinc(II) Ion Homeostasis. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 2023, 43, 1637–1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  316. Amorini, A.M.; Bellia, F.; Di Pietro, V.; Giardina, B.; La Mendola, D.; Lazzarino, G.; Sortino, S.; Tavazzi, B.; Rizzarelli, E.; Vecchio, G. Synthesis and Antioxidant Activity of New Homocarnosine β-Cyclodextrin Conjugates. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2007, 42, 910–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  317. Bonomo, R.P.; Bruno, V.; Conte, E.; De Guidi, G.; La Mendola, D.; Maccarrone, G.; Nicoletti, F.; Rizzarelli, E.; Sortino, S.; Vecchio, G. Potentiometric, Spectroscopic and Antioxidant Activity Studies of SOD Mimics Containing Carnosine. Dalton Trans. 2003, 4406–4415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  318. Oliveri, V.; Bellia, F.; Pietropaolo, A.; Vecchio, G. Unusual Cyclodextrin Derivatives as a New Avenue to Modulate Self- and Metal-Induced Aβ Aggregation. Chem.–A Eur. J. 2015, 21, 14047–14059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  319. Bellia, F.; Grasso, G.I.; Ahmed, I.M.M.; Oliveri, V.; Vecchio, G. Carnoquinolines Target Copper Dyshomeostasis, Aberrant Protein–Protein Interactions, and Oxidative Stress. Chem.–A Eur. J. 2020, 26, 16690–16705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  320. Oliveri, V.; Grasso, G.I.; Bellia, F.; Attanasio, F.; Viale, M.; Vecchio, G. Soluble Sugar-Based Quinoline Derivatives as New Antioxidant Modulators of Metal-Induced Amyloid Aggregation. Inorg. Chem. 2015, 54, 2591–2602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  321. García-Viñuales, S.; Ahmed, R.; Sciacca, M.F.M.; Lanza, V.; Giuffrida, M.L.; Zimbone, S.; Romanucci, V.; Zarrelli, A.; Bongiorno, C.; Spinella, N.; et al. Trehalose Conjugates of Silybin as Prodrugs for Targeting Toxic Aβ Aggregates. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2020, 11, 2566–2576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  322. Sinopoli, A.; Giuffrida, A.; Tomasello, M.F.; Giuffrida, M.L.; Leone, M.; Attanasio, F.; Caraci, F.; De Bona, P.; Naletova, I.; Saviano, M.; et al. Ac-LPFFD-Th: A Trehalose-Conjugated Peptidomimetic as a Strong Suppressor of Amyloid-β Oligomer Formation and Cytotoxicity. ChemBioChem 2016, 17, 1541–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  323. Stefani, M. Biochemical and Biophysical Features of Both Oligomer/Fibril and Cell Membrane in Amyloid Cytotoxicity. FEBS J. 2010, 277, 4602–4613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  324. Rizzarelli, E.; Vecchio, G.; Lazzarino, G.; Amorini, A.M.; Bellia, F. Trehalose Conjugate with Carnosine Having Antioxidant Activity, Stable to Enzymatic Hydrolysis, Procedure for Its Preparation, and Pharmaceutical, Cosmetic and Nutraceutical Compositions That Contain It. European Patent EP1860116A1, 28 November 2007. [Google Scholar]
  325. Grasso, G.I.; Arena, G.; Bellia, F.; Maccarrone, G.; Parrinello, M.; Pietropaolo, A.; Vecchio, G.; Rizzarelli, E. Intramolecular Weak Interactions in the Thermodynamic Stereoselectivity of Copper(II) Complexes with Carnosine–Trehalose Conjugates. Chem.–A Eur. J. 2011, 17, 9448–9455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  326. Bellia, F.; Lanza, V.; Naletova, I.; Tomasello, B.; Ciaffaglione, V.; Greco, V.; Sciuto, S.; Amico, P.; Inturri, R.; Vaccaro, S.; et al. Copper(II) Complexes with Carnosine Conjugates of Hyaluronic Acids at Different Dipeptide Loading Percentages Behave as Multiple SOD Mimics and Stimulate Nrf2 Translocation and Antioxidant Response in In Vitro Inflammatory Model. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 1632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  327. Hevroni, B.L.; Major, D.T.; Dixit, M.; Mhashal, A.R.; Das, S.; Fischer, B. Nucleoside-2′,3′/3′,5′-Bis(Thio)Phosphate Antioxidants Are Also Capable of Disassembly of Amyloid Beta42-Zn(Ii)/Cu(Ii) Aggregates via Zn(Ii)/Cu(Ii)-Chelation. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2016, 14, 4640–4653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  328. Allen, S.J.; Watson, J.J.; Shoemark, D.K.; Barua, N.U.; Patel, N.K. GDNF, NGF and BDNF as Therapeutic Options for Neurodegeneration. Pharmacol. Ther. 2013, 138, 155–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  329. Kambe, T.; Tsuji, T.; Hashimoto, A.; Itsumura, N. The Physiological, Biochemical, and Molecular Roles of Zinc Transporters in Zinc Homeostasis and Metabolism. Physiol. Rev. 2015, 95, 749–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  330. De Luca, S.; Verdoliva, V.; Kargozar, S.; Baino, F. Bioactive Glass-Ceramic Scaffolds Coated with Hyaluronic Acid–Fatty Acid Conjugates: A Feasibility Study. J. Funct. Biomater. 2023, 14, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  331. Bokatyi, A.N.; Dubashynskaya, N.V.; Kudryavtsev, I.V.; Trulioff, A.S.; Rubinstein, A.A.; Vlasova, E.N.; Skorik, Y.A. Linker-Free Hyaluronic Acid-Dexamethasone Conjugates: PH-Responsive Nanocarriers for Targeted Anti-Inflammatory Therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 6608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  332. Amano, Y.; Sakura, K.L.; Ohta, S.; Ito, T. Cisplatin–Chelated Iminodiacetic Acid–Conjugated Hyaluronic Acid Nanogels for the Treatment of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma in Mice. Mol. Pharm. 2022, 19, 853–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  333. Laezza, A.; Pepe, A.; Solimando, N.; Armiento, F.; Oszust, F.; Duca, L.; Bochicchio, B. A Study on Thiol-Michael Addition to Semi-Synthetic Elastin-Hyaluronan Material for Electrospun Scaffolds. ChemPlusChem 2024, 89, e202300662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  334. Sciuto, S.; Greco, V.; Rizzarelli, E.; Bellia, F.; Lanza, V.; Vaccaro, S.; Messina, L. Derivatives Obtained from Hyaluronic Acid and Carnosine. U.S. Patent US10364299B2, 30 July 2019. [Google Scholar]
  335. Rizzarelli, E.; Sciuto, S.; Greco, V.; Satriano, C.; Inturri, R.; Messina, L.; Vaccaro, S. New Derivatives Obtained from Hyaluronic Acid and Carnosine. Patent. EP 3 922 268 B1, 11 December 2023. [Google Scholar]
  336. Siracusa, R.; Impellizzeri, D.; Cordaro, M.; Peritore, A.F.; Gugliandolo, E.; D’Amico, R.; Fusco, R.; Crupi, R.; Rizzarelli, E.; Cuzzocrea, S.; et al. The Protective Effect of New Carnosine-Hyaluronic Acid Conjugate on the Inflammation and Cartilage Degradation in the Experimental Model of Osteoarthritis. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  337. Jeon, N.; Kim, L.; Choi, S.G.; Lee, H.; Min, J.Y.; Kim, H.M.; Han, E.H.; Lee, E. Self-Assembled Peptide-Gold Nanoparticle 1D Nanohybrids Functionalized with GHK Tripeptide for Enhanced Wound-Healing and Photothermal Therapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2025, 17, 15080–15096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  338. Hong, M.; Gui, Y.; Xu, J.; Zhao, X.; Jiang, C.; Zhao, J.; Xin, X.; Liu, D.; Tang, X.; Tang, R.; et al. Palmitoyl Copper Peptide and Acetyl Tyrosine Complex Enhances Melanin Production in Both A375 and B16 Cell Lines. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2025, 742, 151060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  339. Itoh, S.; Kim, H.W.; Nakagawa, O.; Ozumi, K.; Lessner, S.M.; Aoki, H.; Akram, K.; McKinney, R.D.; Masuko Ushio-Fukai, M.; Fukai, T. Novel role of antioxidant-1 (Atox1) as a copper-dependent transcription factor involved in cell proliferation. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 9157–9167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  340. Sturtz, L.A.; Diekert, K.; Jensen, L.T.; Lill, R.; Culotta, V.C. A fraction of yeast Cu,Zn-superoxide dismutase and its metallochaperone, CCS, localize to the intermembrane space of mitochondria. A physiological role for SOD1 in guarding against mitochondrial oxidative damage. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 38084–38089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  341. Ge, Y.; Wang, L.; Li, D.; Zhao, C.; Li, J.; Liu, T. Exploring the Extended Biological Functions of the Human Copper Chaperone of Superoxide Dismutase 1. Protein J. 2019, 38, 463–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  342. Geller, B.L.; Wing, D.R. Rat liver Cu,Zn-superoxide dismutase. Subcellular location in lysosomes. J. Biol. Chem. 1982, 257, 8945–8952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  343. Qiu, L.; Ding, X.; Zhang, Z.; Kang, Y.J. Copper is required for cobalt-induced transcriptional activity of hypoxia-inducible factor-1. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2012, 342, 561–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  344. Feng, W.; Ye, F.; Xue, W.; Zhou, Z.; Kang, Y.J. Copper regulation of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 activity. Mol. Pharmacol. 2009, 75, 174–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  345. Lin, W.; Xu, L.; Li, G. Molecular Insights Into Lysyl Oxidases in Cartilage Regeneration and Rejuvenation. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  346. Colucci-D’amato, L.; Speranza, L.; Volpicelli, F. Neurotrophic Factor Bdnf, Physiological Functions and Therapeutic Potential in Depression, Neurodegeneration and Brain Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  347. Chen, D.; Zhao, M.; Mundy, G.R. Bone Morphogenetic Proteins. Growth Factors 2004, 22, 233–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  348. Hirono, M.; Kudo, M.; Yamada, M.; Yanagawa, Y. The Modulatory Role of Bone Morphogenetic Protein Signaling in Cerebellar Synaptic Plasticity. J. Neurochem. 2025, 169, e16290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  349. Sajrawi, C.; Odeh, M.; Tiwari, A.K.; Agranovich, B.; Abramovich, I.; Zubedat, S.; Saar, G.; Shaulov, L.; Avital, A.; Reznik, D.; et al. Endogenous Histidine Peptides Are Physiological Antioxidants That Prevent Oligodendrocyte Cell Death and Myelin Loss in Vivo. Glia 2025, 73, 122–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  350. Jäkel, S.; Agirre, E.; Mendanha Falcão, A.; van Bruggen, D.; Lee, K.W.; Knuesel, I.; Malhotra, D.; ffrench-Constant, C.; Williams, A.; Castelo-Branco, G. Altered Human Oligodendrocyte Heterogeneity in Multiple Sclerosis. Nature 2019, 566, 543–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  351. Hendrickx, D.A.E.; van Scheppingen, J.; van der Poel, M.; Bossers, K.; Schuurman, K.G.; van Eden, C.G.; Hol, E.M.; Hamann, J.; Huitinga, I. Gene Expression Profiling of Multiple Sclerosis Pathology Identifies Early Patterns of Demyelination Surrounding Chronic Active Lesions. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 1810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  352. Pietrzak, M.; Papp, A.; Curtis, A.; Handelman, S.K.; Kataki, M.; Scharre, D.W.; Rempala, G.; Sadee, W. Gene Expression Profiling of Brain Samples from Patients with Lewy Body Dementia. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2016, 479, 875–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  353. Spaas, J.; Van der Stede, T.; de Jager, S.; van de Waterweg Berends, A.; Tiane, A.; Baelde, H.; Baba, S.P.; Eckhardt, M.; Wolfs, E.; Vanmierlo, T.; et al. Carnosine Synthase Deficiency Aggravates Neuroinflammation in Multiple Sclerosis. Prog. Neurobiol. 2023, 231, 102532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  354. Jeong, E.K.; Selvaraj, B.; Clovis, S.; Son, Y.J.; Park, T.H.; Veeramanoharan, A.; Kim, H.-I.; Yoo, K.-Y.; Lee, J.W.; Park, C.-M. Synthesis and Neuroprotective Effects of H2S-Donor-Peptide Hybrids on Hippocampal Neuronal Cells. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2023, 194, 316–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  355. Zhou, J.; Li, Q.; Wu, W.; Zhang, X.; Zuo, Z.; Lu, Y.; Zhao, H.; Wang, Z. Discovery of Novel Drug Candidates for Alzheimer’s Disease by Molecular Network Modeling. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2022, 15, 850217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  356. Samanta, S.; Rajasekhar, K.; Babagond, V.; Govindaraju, T. Small Molecule Inhibits Metal-Dependent and -Independent Multifaceted Toxicity of Alzheimer’s Disease. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2019, 10, 3611–3621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  357. Rajasekhar, K.; Madhu, C.; Govindaraju, T. Natural Tripeptide-Based Inhibitor of Multifaceted Amyloid β Toxicity. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2016, 7, 1300–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  358. Wei, Y.; Zhou, X.; Li, Z.; Liu, Q.; Ding, H.; Zhou, Y.; Yin, R.; Zheng, L. Genetically Programmed Single-Component Protein Hydrogel for Spinal Cord Injury Repair. Adv. Sci. 2025, 12, 2405054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  359. Schön, M.; Mousa, A.; Berk, M.; Chia, W.L.; Ukropec, J.; Majid, A.; Ukropcová, B.; De Courten, B. The Potential of Carnosine in Brain-Related Disorders: A Comprehensive Review of Current Evidence. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  360. Solana-Manrique, C.; Sanz, F.J.; Martínez-Carrión, G.; Paricio, N. Antioxidant and Neuroprotective Effects of Carnosine: Therapeutic Implications in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  361. Fang, C.; Xie, D.; Xie, L.; Niu, Z.; Su, C.; Huo, Y. Novel Progress in the Application of the Small Molecule Drug Carnosine for the Treatment of Several Diseases (Review). Int. J. Mol. Med. 2025, 56, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  362. Giuffrida, M.L.; Copani, A.; Rizzarelli, E. A Promising Connection between BDNF and Alzheimer’s Disease. Aging 2018, 10, 1791–1792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  363. Solier, S.; Müller, S.; Cañeque, T.; Versini, A.; Mansart, A.; Sindikubwabo, F.; Baron, L.; Emam, L.; Gestraud, P.; Pantoș, G.D.; et al. A Druggable Copper-Signalling Pathway That Drives Inflammation. Nature 2023, 617, 386–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  364. Kim, S.-H.; Cho, Y.-S.; Kim, Y.; Park, J.; Yoo, S.-M.; Gwak, J.; Kim, Y.; Gwon, Y.; Kam, T.; Jung, Y.-K. Endolysosomal Impairment by Binding of Amyloid Beta or MAPT/Tau to V-ATPase and Rescue via the HYAL-CD44 Axis in Alzheimer Disease. Autophagy 2023, 19, 2318–2337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  365. Takasugi, M.; Ohtani, N.; Takemura, K.; Emmrich, S.; Zakusilo, F.T.; Yoshida, Y.; Kutsukake, N.; Mariani, J.N.; Windrem, M.S.; Chandler-Militello, D.; et al. CD44 Correlates with Longevity and Enhances Basal ATF6 Activity and ER Stress Resistance. Cell Rep. 2023, 42, 113130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  366. Radbakhsh, S.; Abrego-Guandique, D.M.; Bacchetti, T.; Aghaee-Bakhtiari, S.H.; Mahmoudi, A.; Manteghi, A.A.; Bazyari, M.J.; Cione, E.; Ferretti, G.; Sahebkar, A. Direct Hybridization and Bioinformatics Analysis of Circulating MicroRNAs in Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease under Intravenous Trehalose Treatment. Brain Res. 2025, 1857, 149607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  367. Pupyshev, A.B.; Klyushnik, T.P.; Akopyan, A.A.; Singh, S.K.; Tikhonova, M.A. Disaccharide Trehalose in Experimental Therapies for Neurodegenerative Disorders: Molecular Targets and Translational Potential. Pharmacol. Res. 2022, 183, 106373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  368. Gopar-Cuevas, Y.; Saucedo-Cardenas, O.; Loera-Arias, M.J.; Montes-de-Oca-Luna, R.; Rodriguez-Rocha, H.; Garcia-Garcia, A. Metformin and Trehalose-Modulated Autophagy Exerts a Neurotherapeutic Effect on Parkinsonʼs Disease. Mol. Neurobiol. 2023, 60, 7253–7273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.