Next Article in Journal
5-HEPE Ameliorates Aging of Duck Ovarian Granulosa Cells by Targeting FOXM1 and Suppressing Oxidative Stress
Previous Article in Journal
Linoleic Hydroperoxides Are Potent Hyperoxidative Agents of Sensitive and Robust Typical 2-Cys Peroxiredoxins
Previous Article in Special Issue
Rivastigmine Templates with Antioxidant Motifs—A Medicinal Chemist’s Toolbox Towards New Multipotent AD Drugs
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Antioxidant Natural Compounds Integrated with Targeted Protein Degradation: A Multi-Modal Strategy for Alzheimer’s Disease Therapy

by
Desh Deepak Singh
1,
Dharmendra Kumar Yadav
2,* and
Dongyun Shin
2,*
1
Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University Rajasthan, Jaipur 303002, India
2
College of Pharmacy, Gachon University, Hambakmoeiro 191, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon 21924, Republic of Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antioxidants 2025, 14(12), 1426; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox14121426
Submission received: 23 October 2025 / Revised: 14 November 2025 / Accepted: 25 November 2025 / Published: 27 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Oxidative Stress as a Therapeutic Target of Alzheimer’s Disease)

Abstract

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder marked by protein aggregation, oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and chronic neuroinflammation, leading to cognitive decline. Current therapies remain largely symptomatic, highlighting the need for multi-target therapeutic strategies. Recent advances in antioxidant natural compounds and targeted protein degradation (TPD) technologies—particularly proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs), offer complementary mechanisms for disease modification. Natural antioxidants, including flavonoids, polyphenols, terpenoids, and alkaloids, confer neuroprotection by reducing reactive oxygen species, activating Nrf2 pathways, restoring mitochondrial function, and suppressing neuroinflammation. PROTACs, in contrast, selectively degrade pathological proteins such as hyperphosphorylated tau, amyloid-β, and APP fragments through the ubiquitin–proteasome system. The integrated “Antiox-PROTAC” approach combines these modalities to simultaneously mitigate oxidative stress and eliminate neurotoxic proteins. Natural compounds may act as warheads or scaffolds in PROTAC design, retaining antioxidant activity while enabling targeted degradation. Early preclinical findings demonstrate synergistic neuroprotective potential, though translational challenges remain, including blood–brain barrier permeability, bioavailability, and delivery optimization. Future directions involve hybrid molecules, nanoparticle-based delivery, and personalized therapeutic strategies. Overall, the Antiox-PROTAC paradigm represents a next-generation, multi-modal framework with the potential to modify disease progression and enhance cognitive outcomes in Alzheimer’s disease.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most prevalent neurodegenerative disorder, accounting for 60–70% of dementia cases worldwide, and represents a major global health challenge in the 21st century [1]. With increasing life expectancy, AD prevalence continues to rise, imposing significant medical, social, and economic burdens [2]. Pathologically, AD is defined by extracellular amyloid-β (Aβ) plaques, intracellular neurofibrillary tangles composed of hyperphosphorylated tau, oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, and synaptic degeneration [2]. Despite decades of research, few disease-modifying therapies exist; most approved treatments provide only symptomatic relief [3]. This limitation underscores the urgent need for innovative, multi-target approaches that act on molecular mechanisms underlying disease progression [4].
Oxidative stress is a central pathological hallmark of AD. Excessive production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and impaired antioxidant defenses lead to mitochondrial dysfunction, lipid peroxidation, protein oxidation, and neuronal apoptosis [5]. Natural antioxidants—including polyphenols, flavonoids, alkaloids, and terpenoids—exert neuroprotective effects by scavenging ROS, activating Nrf2-mediated antioxidant pathways, restoring mitochondrial homeostasis, and modulating inflammatory signaling [6]. However, clinical translation remains challenging due to limited bioavailability, poor blood–brain barrier (BBB) permeability, and metabolic instability [7]. Enhancing antioxidant efficacy through novel formulations, nanocarriers, or molecular targeting strategies could improve therapeutic outcomes in AD [8].
In parallel, targeted protein degradation (TPD) has emerged as a transformative therapeutic concept. Among these, proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) are bifunctional molecules that recruit specific proteins to E3 ubiquitin ligases, leading to their ubiquitination and degradation via the proteasome pathway [9,10]. Unlike traditional enzyme inhibitors, PROTACs act catalytically, allowing sub-stoichiometric dosing and the ability to degrade previously “undruggable” targets, including tau, amyloid precursor protein (APP) fragments, and α-synuclein [11,12]. Preclinical studies have demonstrated successful tau degradation using brain-permeable PROTACs, offering proof-of-concept for their potential in neurodegenerative diseases [12]. Nonetheless, challenges persist—particularly BBB penetration, target selectivity, pharmacokinetic optimization, and off-target degradation, which collectively limit their current clinical translation in AD [13].
Integrating natural antioxidants with PROTAC technology offers a novel and synergistic therapeutic opportunity. Natural compounds possess intrinsic antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-amyloidogenic properties that can complement the targeted degradative action of PROTACs [14]. When combined, these two modalities—termed “Antiox-PROTACs”—could achieve dual benefits: (1) reduction in oxidative and inflammatory stress, and (2) degradation of neurotoxic proteins that drive disease progression [15]. Moreover, antioxidant natural products may serve as structural scaffolds or ligands in PROTAC design, providing favorable pharmacological properties, improved BBB permeability, and enhanced safety profiles [16]. This integration bridges natural product pharmacology with chemical biology, potentially overcoming limitations inherent in each approach when used alone [17].
This review aims to explore the therapeutic convergence between antioxidant natural compounds and TPD technologies within the context of AD. We first examine the mechanistic role of oxidative stress in AD pathogenesis and summarize major antioxidant classes with neuroprotective potential [18]. Next, we discuss advances in PROTAC-mediated protein degradation, highlighting emerging applications for tau and Aβ clearance in neurodegenerative models [19]. Finally, we propose integration models that combine antioxidant scaffolds with PROTAC platforms to generate multifunctional therapeutic molecules, addressing existing gaps in drug delivery, selectivity, and efficacy [20].
The combination of natural product-based discovery and cutting-edge proteomics exemplifies a paradigm shift toward precision, multi-target AD therapy. The development of hybrid “Antiox-PROTACs” aligns with precision medicine strategies, potentially enabling selective modulation of multiple disease pathways—oxidative damage, protein aggregation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and inflammation—within a single therapeutic entity [21]. Continued innovation in BBB-penetrant delivery systems, rational design, and structure–activity optimization may yield disease-modifying outcomes that surpass conventional monotherapies. Collectively, this integrative framework holds promise to reduce the global burden of Alzheimer’s disease and improve patient quality of life.

2. Pathology of Alzheimer’s Disease

The defining pathological features of Alzheimer’s are neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) within neurons and amyloid-beta (Aβ) plaques extracellularly. Recent evidence has shown that small soluble intracellular amyloid-β (Aβ) oligomers, rather than the large extracellular plaques, represent the most neurotoxic species of Aβ. These oligomers disrupt synaptic signaling, impair mitochondrial function, and induce oxidative stress and neuroinflammatory responses, leading to progressive neuronal dysfunction. Aβ is a peptide generated by the abnormal sequential cleavage of amyloid precursor protein (APP) by β- and γ-secretases, resulting in peptides that aggregate within and around neurons. While extracellular accumulation of Aβ interferes with neuronal communication and activates microglia through excitotoxic and inflammatory pathways, hyperphosphorylated tau, a microtubule-associated protein, self-aggregates into paired helical filaments that form neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs), causing cytoskeletal destabilization, axonal transport defects, and neuronal apoptosis. Together, these pathological processes contribute synergistically to the neurodegenerative cascade observed in Alzheimer’s disease (Figure 1) [22]. The amalgamation of the toxic mechanisms from the Aβ and tau pathology leads to an eventual cascade of synaptic degeneration, impaired mitochondrial function, and disrupted calcium homeostasis and cognitive decline [23]. Furthermore, neuroinflammation is notably important as activated microglia and astrocytes release pro-inflammatory cytokines, reactive oxygen species, and activated glial cells can contribute to neuronal injury [24]. Vascular contributions to pathology, including cerebral amyloid angiopathy, can limit cerebral blood flow and compromise the blood–brain barrier and further pathology. Genetic risk factors, particularly mutations in APP and presenilin 1 and 2 (PSEN1, PSEN2), and the presence of the apolipoprotein E ε4 (APOE ε4) allele increase risk through their effects on the metabolism and clearance of Aβ [25]. Other important pathogenic mechanisms include cholinergic neuronal loss in the basal forebrain, loss of neurotransmitters (e.g., loss of acetylcholine), glutamate dysregulation, and synaptic vesicle dysfunction, which all contribute to memory and learning [26]. Over time, neuronal death results in observable brain changes such as cortical thinning, ventricular enlargement, and medial temporal lobe atrophy that can be seen on neuroimaging [27]. The pathological process of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) emerges years before observable clinical signs, often progressing through mild cognitive impairment to more advanced stages of dementia, including severe dementia [28]. While AD is the leading cause of dementia worldwide, the specifics of its development are still relatively unclear, although several aspects of the disease are multifactorial in nature, with evidence supporting possible involvement from genetic, environmental, vascular, and lifestyle mechanisms [29]. The final pathology of AD then consists of all of the aforementioned processes converging with amyloid deposition, tau aggregation, neuroinflammation, vascular dysfunction, and neurotransmitter deficiency contributing to an ongoing breakdown in cognitive, functional, and behavioral capacity [30].

3. Antioxidant Natural Compounds in Neuroprotection

3.1. Oxidative Stress and Mitochondrial Dysfunction in AD

Oxidative stress is a critical pathological mechanism in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) that contributes to neuronal loss and cognitive decline. Excessive production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), resulting from mitochondrial dysfunction, impaired antioxidant defenses, and neuroinflammatory processes, exacerbates neurodegeneration (Figure 2) [31]. Consistent findings have identified mitochondrial dysfunction in AD brains, including reduced cytochrome oxidase activity, impaired ATP synthesis, and increased lipid peroxidation [32]. These alterations disrupt neuronal energy homeostasis and amplify oxidative damage to proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids. Moreover, Aβ peptides and hyperphosphorylated tau species further aggravate oxidative organelle injury by disturbing mitochondrial homeostasis and altering calcium dynamics, thereby perpetuating the cycle of oxidative stress and mitochondrial impairment. Collectively, this interplay between oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction provides a strong rationale for pharmacologically restoring redox balance using natural antioxidants (Table 1).

3.2. Classes of Natural Antioxidants

Many natural antioxidant compounds exhibit neuroprotective activity in animal models of AD (Figure 3) [39]. This includes dietary antioxidants such as flavonoids, which are present in various foods including fruits, vegetables, and tea and cocoa, and the flavonoid extracts quercetin, epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), and luteolin demonstrate strong reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging activity [40]. Besides their antioxidant properties, flavonoids influence critical tau hyperphosphorylation, as well as target key enzymes implicated in amyloid-β (Aβ) aggregation, influencing two major pathological processes associated with AD [40].
Another group of neuroprotective natural compounds includes polyphenols. Resveratrol, curcumin, and ferulic acid are examples of polyphenols that protect neurons by stimulating mitochondrial biogenesis and intracellular lipid peroxidation and inhibiting pro-inflammatory signaling [41]. Curcumin additionally demonstrates the dual activity of stabilizing and disrupting protein aggregation while reducing oxidative stress. This dual activity may make curcumin an important compound for the future of multi-target therapies aimed at the role of AD [42]. Terpenoids, including compounds like ginsenosides, bilobalide (from Ginkgo biloba), and Ursolic, have demonstrated antioxidative, anti-inflammatory, and neurotrophic effects [43]. These compounds help to maintain the mitochondrial membrane potential, support survival pathways in neurons, and have been shown to improve cognitive outcomes in models of AD, demonstrating their potential in neurodegeneration [44].
Alkaloids, including huperzine A and berberine, demonstrate both antioxidant and neuroprotective effects. Along with their ability to scavenge ROS, these compounds also demonstrate cholinesterase inhibition and increase synaptic acetylcholine levels while reducing neuronal toxicity [45]. This dual mechanism renders alkaloids as particularly interesting options for both symptomatic and disease-modifying interventions in AD. Finally, other natural antioxidants, which include carotenoids, vitamins C and E, and coenzyme Q10, confer neuroprotection through stabilizing cell membranes and supporting mitochondrial functions [46]. These compounds supplement the activities of compounds from the other classes and aid in maintaining cellular homeostasis while under oxidative stress conditions. These classes of natural antioxidants together provide a diverse pharmaceutical arsenal for making multi-target therapeutics aimed at Alzheimer’s disease that ultimately take on challenges related to the complex, multi-faceted nature of neurodegeneration [47].

3.3. Mechanisms of Action and ROS Scavenging, Nrf2 Pathway, Anti-Inflammatory Effects

The neuroprotective effectiveness of antioxidant natural compounds is due to their ability to modulate many interrelated cellular pathways, which is especially beneficial in complex diseases such as AD [48]. One major mechanism is the scavenging of reactive oxygen species (ROS), in which some of these compounds act directly to neutralize ROS, thereby decreasing oxidative injury to neuronal lipids, proteins, and DNA [49]. This action prevents the collapse of mitochondria and preserves cellular energy homeostasis, which is disrupted in AD. Another main mechanism is the activation of the Nrf2 pathway [50]. Many of the natural antioxidants activate the nuclear factor erythroid 2–2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), which is a master transcriptional regulator of cellular antioxidant defenses. When Nrf2 is activated, it enhances the expression of cytoprotective genes, including heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), glutathione peroxidase, and superoxide dismutase, which enhances the neuron’s capability to combat oxidative stress and restore redox balance. Anti-inflammatory effects also aid in a complementary mechanism of neuroprotection [51]. Natural antioxidants modulate microglial activation and inhibit pro-inflammatory mediators, including TNF-α, IL-1β, and NF-κB signaling. By dampening chronic neuroinflammation, the use of antioxidant natural compounds can diminish secondary neuronal injury and suppress the spread of AD pathology [52].
The protection of the mitochondria is another important aspect of a multi-modal or pleiotropic approach [53]. Several antioxidants maintain mitochondrial membrane potential, promote mitochondrial biogenesis, and sustain ATP production in order to avoid the activation of apoptotic pathways. In doing so, not only is neuronal viability maintained, but synaptic function, which is essential for cognition, is also preserved [53]. Finally, several natural compounds directly target protein aggregation, affecting amyloid-β fibrillization and tau hyperphosphorylation. In addition to these direct anti-inflammatory properties, antioxidants act on various upstream and downstream contributors to neurodegeneration by affecting central pathological processes [54]. This multi-modal or pleiotropic character (e.g., antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, mitochondrial, anti-aggregation) makes these natural compounds ideally suited for a multi-target approach in AD pathology [55]. The ability to simultaneously affect several pathways across this disease spectrum underscores their potential as key components in novel therapeutic approaches, such as combination strategies [56].

3.4. Challenges of Blood–Brain Barrier (BBB) Permeability and Bioavailability

Despite the encouraging preclinical data discussed earlier, there has been some disappointment in advancing natural antioxidants to clinical application in treating AD [57]. One of the constraints is that natural antioxidants have poor pharmacokinetic properties, such as low solubility, rapid metabolism, and low oral bioavailability [58]. In addition, they must adequately penetrate the blood–brain barrier (BBB) to reach the central nervous system. For example, curcumin and resveratrol display powerful in vitro activity but yield subtherapeutic concentrations in the brain due to the extensive first-pass effect [59]. Polyphenols, as well, undergo rapid glucuronidation and sulfation to limit their systemic availability [60].
To address these challenges, new strategies are being explored. Systems based on nanoparticles, formulations based on liposome delivery, and structural modifications of natural compounds have been explored for improving penetration across the BBB and extending half-life [61]. The conjugation of antioxidant scaffolds to lipid moieties or ligands targeting transporters may further improve CNS delivery [62]. All of these strategies are important to ensure that the neuroprotective potential of natural antioxidants can be translated into clinically relevant neuroprotective therapies [63].

4. Targeted Protein Degradation Technologies

4.1. Overview of PROTACs, Molecular Glues, and Other TPD Modalities

Targeted protein degradation (TPD) represents a novel paradigm shift towards selectively eliminating disease-causing proteins instead of only inhibiting their activities [64]. In the TPD technologies, proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) are bifunctional compounds that induce the target protein to an E3 ubiquitin ligase, resulting in ubiquitination and degradation via the proteasome [65]. Importantly, PROTACs act catalytically (Figure 4), allowing for sub-stoichiometric dosing and, unlike small molecules, the ability to target proteins that would have previously been considered “undruggable,” including some associated with neurodegenerative diseases [65]. Other modalities, including molecular glues, stabilize an interaction between an E3 ligase and a target protein, without the need for a linker. Further, with emerging TPD modalities like lysosome-targeting chimeras (LYTACs) and autophagy-targeting chimeras (AUTACs), scientists can harness degradation pathways besides just proteasomal degradation [66]. Collectively, this set of tools affords a global strategy for targeted protein modulation in complex disease landscapes [67].

4.2. Main E3 Ligases and the Implications in CNS Disorders

E3 ubiquitin ligases are pivotal in defining TPD specificity due to their capacity to determine which proteins are recruited for degradation [68]. Some of the most common ligases used in TPD research include cereblon (CRBN), von Hippel–Lindau (VHL), and MDM2, all of which have unique substrate selectivity [69]. When considering CNS disorders, the expression and distribution of the ligases will be important. If the ligase is not adequately distributed in the CNS, then degradation will not work efficiently [70]. Recent evidence has shown E3 ligase profiles in various neuronal and glial populations, providing information on potential candidates for PROTAC therapies for neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease (Figure 5) [70]. Integration of Antioxidants and PROTAC Pathways in Alzheimer’s Disease Therapy is shown in Table 2.

4.3. Neurodegenerative Applications of PROTACs

The use of PROTACs in neurodegenerative diseases is an emerging area of investigation. Preclinical studies have shown that tau-targeted PROTACs can reduce tau aggregation, one of the pathological hallmarks of AD, and alpha-synuclein-recruited PROTACs have shown potential in animal models of Parkinson’s disease [71]. The ability of PROTACs to selectively degrade the disease-causing protein, rather than just inhibit its function as is observed with most small-molecule inhibitors, provides several distinct advantages, including attenuating toxic gain-of-function properties or decreasing protein accumulation [72]. Natural product-derived scaffolds or CNS-penetrant ligands in bifunctional designs are currently being tested to improve the specificity and bioavailability of the PROTACs in development. Next-generation neurotherapeutics are on the horizon [73].

4.4. Challenges of TPD in the Brain

Promising approach to mitigating the extracellular Aβ burden in Alzheimer’s disease. By selectively degrading key Aβ-generating enzymes such as β-secretase (BACE1) or other APP-processing components, PROTACs can effectively reduce Aβ peptide formation [72]. Moreover, targeting intracellular Aβ oligomers for proteasomal degradation may enhance cellular clearance mechanisms, thereby limiting the aggregation and deposition of extracellular Aβ plaques [73]. This dual mechanism, which prevents new Aβ generation while promoting the degradation of toxic intracellular species, highlights the therapeutic potential of PROTACs in modulating amyloid pathology and slowing neurodegenerative progression. While promising, TPD approaches have significant challenges for CNS, especially regarding BBB permeability [74]. Many PROTACs are relatively large polar molecules and will not passively diffuse through the BBB [75]. Researchers are investigating various strategies for CNS delivery, including maximizing the properties of the drug molecules, prodrug-based approaches, and nanoparticle-based drug carriers [76]. Other challenges that may arise are selectivity and off-target degradation of proteins that are not pathogenic, as this could lead to unwanted toxicity [77]. Additionally, developing a clearer understanding of the localized expression of neuronal E3 ligases and the dynamic expression changes over disease states is important for the design of TPD [78]. Finally, pharmacokinetic and metabolic stability concerns may further complicate the development of TPD for the CNS, further complicating dosing regimen and formulation considerations [79]. In conclusion, TPD technologies, specifically PROTACs and molecular glues, demonstrate significant potential for CNS-targeted therapeutics via specific degradation of pathogenic proteins [80]. Nevertheless, effective translatability into treatments for neurodegenerative diseases requires solutions to key obstacles in the following: the efficiency of delivery to the brain, ligase selection, and safety [81]. Thus, combining TPD technologies with complementary strategies, natural product scaffolds, and/or co-therapies using antioxidants provides an enticing direction for further exploration. A summary of targeted protein degradation (TPD) technologies, including PROTACs, molecular glues, and related modalities, is presented in Table 3.

5. Rationale for Integrating Antioxidants with PROTACs

5.1. Complementary Mechanisms: Oxidative Stress Reduction and Protein Clearance

AD is a multifactorial disorder that exhibits aspects of proteinopathy and oxidative stress. The aggregation of misfolded proteins, including amyloid-β (Aβ) and hyperphosphorylated tau, induces synaptic dysfunction, mitochondrial failure, and chronic neuroinflammation [87]. At the same time, oxidative stress exacerbates protein aggregation, which leads to lipid peroxidation and DNA damage and culminates in neuronal apoptosis. These interrelated pathophysiological phenomena lead to a cycle of self-reinforcement, establishing that any efficacious therapeutic approach must effectively target both mechanisms concurrently [87].
Antioxidant natural compounds and targeted protein degradation (TPD) technologies both represent complementary approaches for this dual intervention. Natural antioxidants scavenge ROS, modulate the Nrf2 pathway, restore mitochondrial function, and reduce neuroinflammation [88]. PROTACs, on the other hand, selectively target the degradation of pathogenic proteins through E3 ligase recruitment and remove toxic protein species responsible for neuronal dysfunction [89]. Each approach can then be combined to provide synergistic actions, with drug action targeting oxidative stress, while simultaneously, the primary protein pathology is directly removed [90]. This dual-action intervention, in theory, will slow or reverse neurodegeneration more reliably than either intervention on their own, targeting both upstream triggers of disease and downstream consequences of AD pathology (Figure 6) [91].
Figure 6. Therapeutic integration of antioxidants and PROTAC technology in neurodegenerative disorders. Neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s disease (PD), and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) are driven by dual pathological processes—oxidative stress leading to mitochondrial dysfunction and neuronal injury, and protein aggregation involving misfolded proteins like Aβ, tau, and α-synuclein. Antioxidants derived from natural compounds (e.g., curcumin, resveratrol, EGCG, omega-3s, alkaloids, and terpenoids) help counter oxidative stress, while PROTAC (Proteolysis-Targeting Chimera) technology promotes selective degradation of toxic proteins. The integration of these therapeutic strategies provides complementary mechanisms, including reduced cellular stress, decreased toxic aggregates, enhanced neuronal survival, and improved synaptic plasticity, ultimately leading to neuroprotection, preservation of cognitive function, and slowed disease progression. The rationale for integrating antioxidants with PROTACs, focusing on complementary mechanisms like oxidative stress reduction and protein clearance, is shown in Table 4. (Created in BioRender. Singh, D. (2025) https://BioRender.com/pzlt3uv; accessed on 29 October 2025).
Figure 6. Therapeutic integration of antioxidants and PROTAC technology in neurodegenerative disorders. Neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s disease (PD), and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) are driven by dual pathological processes—oxidative stress leading to mitochondrial dysfunction and neuronal injury, and protein aggregation involving misfolded proteins like Aβ, tau, and α-synuclein. Antioxidants derived from natural compounds (e.g., curcumin, resveratrol, EGCG, omega-3s, alkaloids, and terpenoids) help counter oxidative stress, while PROTAC (Proteolysis-Targeting Chimera) technology promotes selective degradation of toxic proteins. The integration of these therapeutic strategies provides complementary mechanisms, including reduced cellular stress, decreased toxic aggregates, enhanced neuronal survival, and improved synaptic plasticity, ultimately leading to neuroprotection, preservation of cognitive function, and slowed disease progression. The rationale for integrating antioxidants with PROTACs, focusing on complementary mechanisms like oxidative stress reduction and protein clearance, is shown in Table 4. (Created in BioRender. Singh, D. (2025) https://BioRender.com/pzlt3uv; accessed on 29 October 2025).
Antioxidants 14 01426 g006
Table 4. The rationale for integrating antioxidants with PROTACs focuses on complementary mechanisms like oxidative stress reduction and protein clearance.
Table 4. The rationale for integrating antioxidants with PROTACs focuses on complementary mechanisms like oxidative stress reduction and protein clearance.
S.N.Integration AspectAntioxidant FunctionPROTAC FunctionComplementary Effects/RationalePotential Targets in ADNotes/ReferencesReferences
1 Oxidative Stress MitigationScavenge ROS, upregulate Nrf2/ARE pathway, reduce lipid peroxidation, restore mitochondrial functionFacilitates the removal of ROS-generating misfolded proteins indirectly by clearing their sourceReduces neuronal damage caused by oxidative stress while PROTACs remove proteins that exacerbate ROS productionAβ aggregates, hyperphosphorylated tau, and APP C-terminal fragmentsAntioxidants like quercetin, curcumin, and resveratrol can be incorporated into hybrid PROTAC designs[92]
2 Protein ClearanceSome antioxidants inhibit aggregation (e.g., curcumin, EGCG), but do not remove proteinsCatalytically degrade pathogenic proteins via E3 ligase recruitment and ubiquitin–proteasome pathwayCombination ensures both inhibition of new aggregate formation and removal of existing aggregatesTau, Aβ, APP C-terminal fragments, α-synucleinDual-action approach addresses upstream (oxidative stress) and downstream (proteinopathy) mechanisms[93]
3Anti-Inflammatory EffectsSuppresses microglial activation and pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β)Can target proteins driving inflammatory signaling (e.g., NF-κB, NLRP3 inflammasome components)Synergistic reduction of chronic neuroinflammation in AD, protecting neuronal networksNF-κB, NLRP3, pro-inflammatory mediatorsProvides multi-level protection against AD progression[94]
4 Mitochondrial ProtectionMaintains membrane potential, ATP production, and biogenesisRemoves proteins that impair mitochondrial function (e.g., tau aggregates)Preserves energy metabolism and reduces apoptosis; enhances neuronal survivalTau, misfolded mitochondrial proteinsIntegration enhances overall neuronal resilience[95]
5Multi-Targeted NeuroprotectionBroad pleiotropic effects: ROS scavenging, anti-inflammatory, mitochondrial supportSelective protein degradation with catalytic efficiencyCombines pleiotropic neuroprotection with targeted clearance, potentially reducing required dosages and off-target effectsMultiple AD-related proteins and pathwaysForms the conceptual basis for “Antiox-PROTACs”[96]

5.2. Putting Potential Targets into the Equation: Tau, Aβ, APP CTFs, and Neuroinflammatory Mediators

The choice of molecular targets is important for the development of an integrated antioxidant-PROTAC strategy [97]. The tau protein, which aggregates into neurofibrillary tangles, is a primary target for therapeutics [97]. PROTACs could be designed to degrade hyperphosphorylated tau, while antioxidants would work to mitigate the oxidative injury that incites the misfolding of tau [98]. Further, Aβ peptides and APP CTFs have been shown to promote plaque formation and toxicity at the synapse. The clearance of these species by PROTACs and the protection of mitochondria by antioxidants may, therefore, additionally mitigate neuronal injury and cognitive decline [99].
Neuroinflammation is also a significant factor in AD progression, as activated microglia and astrocytes release pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 [99]. Antioxidants inhibit such inflammatory mediators, and PROTACs can be developed to degrade key signaling proteins that are promoting the chronic inflammatory state, including components of the NF-κB family and NLRP3 inflammasome subunits [100]. This could provide a mechanism for multi-targeted disease modification by addressing both protein aggregation and inflammatory pathways at multi-levels of treatment, addressing cytotoxic triggers and the cellular environment sustaining neurodegeneration [101].

5.3. Natural Compounds Like Scaffolds or Warheads for PROTAC Design

Natural antioxidants not only possess therapeutic ability but also serve as molecular scaffolds or warheads for PROTAC design [102]. PROTACs typically contain a ligand for the target protein, a ligand for an E3 ligase, and a chemical linker [103]. Incorporating a natural antioxidant moiety as the target-binding component has several advantages [104]. The first advantage is that these compounds often have intrinsic neuroprotective activity, exhibiting additional clinical benefits apart from protein degradation [105]. The second advantage is that natural compounds have greater structural diversity, creating opportunities to engage previously ‘undruggable’ targets, such as protein aggregates and transcriptional regulators of oxidative stress [106].
For instance, curcumin or resveratrol, which are polyphenols, could act as tau- or Aβ-targeting ligands while simultaneously exerting ROS-scavenging and anti-inflammatory effects [106]. Flavonoids such as quercetin or EGCG could also be used as warheads to recruit E3 ligases to key pathological proteins, enhancing selectivity and limiting degradation of off-target proteins [106]. Because PROTACs employ these natural product scaffolds, PROTACs can incorporate all of the pleiotropic benefits of antioxidants combined with the catalytic efficiency of targeted protein degradation to develop multifunctional therapeutics uniquely designed for complex CNS disorders [107]. These findings suggest that PROTACs, by recruiting E3 ligases to specifically degrade intracellular Aβ oligomers or Aβ-producing enzymes, could not only mitigate intracellular toxicity but also diminish extracellular plaque deposition by limiting aggregation precursors and enhancing proteasomal clearance pathways.

6. Combination Delivery and Synergistic Approaches

The successful implementation of antioxidant-based PROTAC approaches necessitates the consideration of delivery, as well as interacting synergistically [108]. Combination delivery systems, such as nanoparticles, liposomes, or polymeric carriers, can help deliver the PROTAC molecule and the antioxidant compounds across the BBB, permitting their action at the neuronal sites of interest at the same time [109]. This type of delivery platform may also enhance pharmacokinetics, CNS penetration, and controlled release for maximum therapeutic benefit and minimal systemic exposure [110]. Synergy can also be realized through time or space coordination. For example, antioxidants may potentiate the neuronal environment by decreasing oxidative stress and inflammation that create a “neuroprotective” environment for protein clearance mediated by PROTAC [111]. In contrast, the PROTAC-mediated degradation of misfolded proteins could decrease ROS generation and mitochondrial dysfunction, providing further neuroprotection from oxidative stress [112]. Computer modeling and high-throughput screening methods can be used to determine the best combinations of compounds, linker length, and E3 ligase specificities for optimal therapeutic synergy [113].
In addition, if a compound integrates both antioxidant and PROTAC properties, it may lower the necessary doses of each ingredient, with a reduction in toxicity that can occur with high doses of either PROTACs or polyphenols [114]. A multi-targeted strategy is especially pertinent for AD, where monotherapy strategies have mostly failed due to the heterogeneity and complexity of the disease [115]. Antioxidant-PROTAC therapeutics would target proteinopathy, oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and neuroinflammation simultaneously. This kind of therapy could lead to comprehensive disease modification, leading to an improvement in structural and functional measures in a patient [116].
The combination of natural antioxidant compounds with PROTAC technology presents a new and exciting avenue for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease [117]. By bringing together various complementary mechanisms, such as the abatement of ROS, anti-inflammatory mechanisms, and targeted clearance of pathological proteins, we are targeting several pathological markers at the same time [118]. Natural compounds not only can act as neuroprotective agents but can also offer a well-designed functional scaffold for PROTAC design that may enhance selectivity, efficacy, and safety [119]. Co-delivery and synergism provide an opportunity to improve therapeutic benefit through these strategies and, as a result, offer a multi-modal therapy to overcome limitations of single-target strategies [120]. Continued advancements in research of both natural product pharmacology and targeted protein degradation will ultimately lead to the emergence of “Antiox-PROTACs,” which may represent a novel next-generation approach for disease-modifying therapy in Alzheimer’s disease, with the potential to significantly improve patient quality of life and outcome [121] (Table 4).

7. Discovery and Development Pipeline

7.1. High-Throughput Screening of Antioxidant Libraries

The discovery of antioxidant-based therapeutics begins with high-throughput screening (HTS) of natural product libraries, including flavonoids, polyphenols, terpenoids, and alkaloids [121]. Compounds are evaluated for ROS scavenging, protein aggregation inhibition, and neurotoxicity using automated neuronal assays [122,123]. Modern HTS integrates computational tools such as molecular docking and machine learning to prioritize molecules with favorable BBB permeability, physicochemical profiles, and potential for PROTAC scaffold development [124]. This systematic approach enables the identification of candidates with dual antioxidant and protein-targeting properties. Pipeline stages, methodologies, and readouts in preclinical neurotherapeutic studies are shown in Table 5.

7.2. In Vitro Assays: ROS Reduction, Aggregation Inhibition, and Neuronal Protection

Following HTS, in vitro assays play a crucial role in validating the mechanistic potential of candidate compounds [131]. ROS reduction can be assessed using probes such as DCFDA or MitoSOX in neuronal cell lines and primary neurons [132]. Protein aggregation inhibition is evaluated through thioflavin T binding, electron microscopy, and filter-trap assays to measure amyloid-β and tau fibrillization [133]. Neuroprotection is further confirmed via assays for cell viability, mitochondrial depolarization, and synaptic integrity markers [134]. These combined outputs help identify compounds with pleiotropic neuroprotective actions, vital for integration into PROTAC-based strategies [134].

7.3. Identifying Targets Using Proteomic and Metabolomic Profiling

Proteomic and metabolomic profiling facilitate the selection of compounds for PROTAC design by revealing molecular targets, pathways, and downstream effects of antioxidant candidates [135]. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics identifies proteins that interact with or are modulated by the compound, including key Alzheimer’s disease targets such as tau, APP C-terminal fragments, and oxidative stress-related enzymes [136,137]. Metabolomics complements this by mapping mitochondrial function, redox balance, and neuroinflammatory metabolites, enabling the rational selection of PROTAC targets and the design of multi-modal therapeutic constructs [137].

7.4. Designing Antioxidant-FIRST Protacs: Scaffold Design and Linker Chemistry

The final phase focuses on designing antioxidant-based PROTACs, wherein lead natural products possessing inherent protein-binding ligands (“warheads”) are coupled with E3 ligase-recruiting moieties [138]. Scaffold design aims to optimize binding affinity, selectivity, stability, and BBB permeability while retaining the compound’s antioxidant function [139]. Appropriate linker chemistry ensures spatial alignment between the ligand and E3 ligase to facilitate proximal ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation [140]. Iterative cycles of medicinal chemistry, in silico modeling, and cellular assays refine selectivity, potency, and pharmacokinetic properties [141]. Altogether, integrating HTS, mechanistic validation, omics-guided target discovery, and rational PROTAC design forms a cohesive discovery-to-development pipeline for next-generation neurotherapeutics [142].
Multiple natural antioxidants exhibit meaningful neuroprotective and cognitive benefits in preclinical AD models [143]. Curcumin, a polyphenol from Curcuma longa, reduces Aβ accumulation, tau hyperphosphorylation, and oxidative stress, enhancing learning and memory [144]. Resveratrol improves cognition through SIRT1 and Nrf2 activation, boosting mitochondrial function and reducing ROS [145]. Flavonoids such as quercetin and EGCG exert antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects by limiting microglial activation [146]. Terpenoids including ginsenosides and bilobalide restore mitochondrial membrane potential, promoting neuronal survival and function [147]. Collectively, these findings highlight antioxidant-based PROTACs as promising multi-targeted therapeutics that mitigate oxidative stress and degrade pathogenic proteins, advancing the translational potential for Alzheimer’s disease therapy.

8. Preclinical Evidence and Case Studies

8.1. Natural Antioxidant Leads with Cognitive and Neuroprotective Effects

Multiple natural antioxidants have demonstrated significant neuroprotective and cognitive benefits in preclinical models of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) [119]. Curcumin, a polyphenol derived from Curcuma longa, reduces amyloid-β (Aβ) accumulation, inhibits tau hyperphosphorylation, and mitigates oxidative stress, thereby improving learning and memory in rodent models [148]. Resveratrol also enhances cognitive performance in APP-transgenic mice through activation of SIRT1 and Nrf2 signaling pathways, which collectively enhance mitochondrial function and reduce ROS levels [148]. Similarly, flavonoids such as quercetin and epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) exhibit dual antioxidant and anti-inflammatory actions by limiting microglial activation, leading to improved neuronal health and cognition [149]. Furthermore, terpenoids including ginsenosides and bilobalide restore mitochondrial membrane potential, supporting neuronal survival and functional recovery. Collectively, these findings underscore the therapeutic potential of antioxidant leads as multi-targeted neuroprotective agents [150].

8.2. Proof-of-Concept PROTACs in Neurodegenerative Models

Recently, targeted protein degradation technologies, especially PROTACs, have emerged in the study of neurodegeneration in preclinical models. Tau-targeted PROTACs were able to selectively clear hyperphosphorylated tau aggregates in both neuronal cultures and transgenic mice, leading to decreased synaptic toxicity and improved behavioral outcomes [151]. Alpha-synuclein-targeted PROTACs also demonstrated benefits in models of Parkinson’s disease, with the latter promoting the degradation of pathogenic forms of alpha-synuclein while sparing the native form [152]. These proof-of-concept studies demonstrate the feasibility of applying TPD approaches in the CNS while also identifying challenges such as BBB penetrance and cellular delivery for translational applications [137,153].

8.3. Initial Integrative Efforts: Antioxidant Derivatives in TPD Research

Research is now exploring the potential for natural antioxidant scaffolds to be integrated into TPD modalities [154]. More specifically, polyphenol-derived compounds, with structural alterations, have been studied as potential ligands or warheads for PROTAC constructs, with a view to achieving both antioxidant activity and protein degradation in a targeted manner [155]. Overall, in vitro studies demonstrate that these conjugates can mitigate oxidative stress while promoting ubiquitin–proteasome clearance of aggregation-prone proteins. While full-fledged antioxidant-based PROTACs for AD are still several years from development, early studies validate that natural compounds can serve a dual purpose (i.e., neuroprotection and selective protein clearance) [156].Although the Antiox-PROTAC concept remains largely theoretical, preliminary studies emerging from the field support its feasibility. A few in vitro reports have demonstrated PROTAC-like chimeras that integrate antioxidant scaffolds with E3-ligase ligands to promote degradation of pro-oxide or misfolded proteins. For instance, curcumin-based PROTACs targeting NF-κB and STAT3 have shown effective suppression of inflammatory and oxidative pathways in cancer and neuronal cell models. Resveratrol-derived PROTACs have been designed to modulate the Keap1–Nrf2 signaling pathway, leading to enhanced antioxidant responses and decreased ROS accumulation. Similarly, melatonin-based hybrid degraders have demonstrated both ROS-scavenging potential and proteasome-dependent clearance of aggregation-prone proteins. These pilot findings indicate that antioxidant–PROTAC conjugates could achieve dual functionality, restore redox balance, and degrade pathogenic proteins, thereby supporting further preclinical investigation in neurodegenerative disease models. All the preclinical data support the rationale for combined Antiox-PROTAC approaches, showing that antioxidant agents can have beneficial effects while also informing the development of targeted protein degraders [137]. Future studies will need to focus on optimizing CNS pharmacokinetics, delivery, and selectivity to ultimately translate these approaches to the clinic for treatment of AD and other neurodegenerative disorders. Preclinical evidence of natural antioxidants with cognitive and neuroprotective effects in Alzheimer’s disease models is summarized in Table 6.

9. Translational and Clinical Perspectives

9.1. BBB Delivery and Brain Bioavailability Challenges

A primary barrier to the clinical translation of antioxidant-based PROTACs is delivering them from systemic circulation across the BBB. Consequently, many PROTACs are polar and/or large molecules that are likely to have very limited passive diffusion [165]. Many natural antioxidants are weakly absorbed after oral dosing or undergo rapid metabolism and undergo chemical modification [166]. Proposed methods for mitigating these obstacles include efforts in prodrug design, lipidation, nanoparticle encapsulation to the desired sites, and receptor-mediated transport systems [167]. Each of these strategies attempts to promote penetration into the CNS at effective concentrations and duration of therapy at the target site of action. Further, to optimize brain delivery, PROTAC molecular size, lipophilicity, and attachment of a linker molecule should be optimized in combinations that yield effects on PROTAC BBB permeability and performance as an antioxidant [168].

9.2. Safety, Off-Target Effects, and Metabolic Stability

Safety considerations continue to be an important consideration for any CNS-targeted TPD intervention [169]. Notably, while PROTACS may degrade target proteins, they can also degrade off-target proteins, disrupting critical neuronal or even systemic pathways [170]. Antioxidant-PROTAC conjugates will need to be demonstrated to be non-cytotoxic, not perturb mitochondrial function, and not disrupt normal proteostasis [171]. Furthermore, rapid degradation or biotransformation of the PROTAC or the antioxidant moiety could also impact efficacy and may produce undesirable metabolites [172]. Therefore, preclinical toxicology studies and rational medicinal chemistry modification studies will need to be completed to reduce unintended effects while maintaining the necessary pharmacological activities.

9.3. Regulatory and Manufacturing Considerations

Moving antioxidant-PROTAC therapeutics from the bench to the bedside necessitates careful consideration of regulatory and manufacturing considerations [173]. TPD molecules are new chemical entities and thus should be characterized preclinically for pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and safety considerations. Manufacturing components must also have good reproducibility/purity/stability, especially if natural product scaffolds are sustained, as these products could have variations across different batches [174]. Depending on the CNS delivery, combination treatment strategies, or first-in-class mechanism of action, additional assessments may be warranted by regulatory agencies [175]. This work highlights the importance of chemists, pharmacologists, and clinical team members collaboratively working together to successfully navigate regulatory, scalable, and GMP-compliant manufacturing processes [176]. In conclusion, antioxidant-based PROTACs represent a promising multi-targeted strategy for Alzheimer’s disease, but the success of clinical translation will be determined by several factors, including overcoming challenges associated with the BBB and bioavailability, addressing safety and metabolic stability, determining appropriate biomarker monitoring, and solving regulatory and manufacturing challenges [177]. These factors provide a framework for evaluating next-generation therapeutics from preclinical models to human clinical trials.

10. Future Directions and Opportunities

10.1. Hybrid Molecules: Antioxidant-PROTAC Chimeras

One area of next-generation AD therapeutics could involve the development of hybrid molecules combining antioxidant scaffolds with PROTAC function [178]. These chimeras can neutralize reactive oxygen species (ROS), while also selectively degrading tau or amyloid-β proteins. A hybrid design combining both mechanisms will maximize therapeutic activity, decrease our need for compounds, and possibly minimize overall toxicity [179]. Natural product-derived model PROTACs retain both antioxidant and protein-targeting activity. Early experimental models suggest that they can be developed for multi-targeted therapeutic interventions in neurodegeneration [180].

10.2. Delivery Mechanism: Nanoparticle- and Lipid-Based Systems

Advanced delivery mechanisms will be important for clinical translation. Nanoparticle- and lipid-based delivery strategies can overcome BBB restrictions and optimize bioavailability of a potentially large and/or polar delivery cargo [181]. Encapsulation can help protect antioxidant and PROTAC moieties from metabolic degradation, help to control release, and improve CNS penetration [182]. Targeted delivery through the use of surface ligands or receptor-mediated transport mechanisms can provide increased neuronal uptake, limited off-target effects, and improved pharmacokinetics [183]. This type of delivery platform can also co-deliver more than one therapeutic agent, facilitating the exploration of synergistic and combination approaches to AD therapeutics [184].

10.3. Individualized Medicine Approach: Factors in Patient-Specific Pathology

Potentially, patients with AD have high inter-subject heterogeneity with respect to protein pathology, oxidative stress, and neuroinflammatory pathology. Individualized medicine could lead to the tailoring of antioxidant-PROTAC therapies to the individual molecular signatures of patients [185]. Genomic, proteomic, and metabolomic profiling may identify patients most likely to respond to hybrid molecules or combinations of molecular therapeutics [186]. This approach increases the likelihood of success for AD patients based on the compatibility of the therapy with patient-specific pathology and allows precision dosing to avoid complications while achieving favorable cognitive outcomes [187].

10.4. Collaboration with Emerging Therapeutics: Gene Therapy and Immunotherapy

Collaboration with emerging therapeutic modalities provides additional opportunities for improved efficacy in AD therapeutics [188]. Antioxidant-PROTAC strategies could be combined with emerging gene therapy strategies such as RNA interference or CRISPR-mediated modulation of tau or APP expression to achieve a synergistic reduction in pathogenic protein load [189]. Similarly, there could be an opportunity for blending with immunotherapy strategies that target concerns around amyloid or tau to enhance clearance, as well as modulate neuroinflammatory responses [190]. Both of these strategies allow multi-faceted approaches and target both the causative proteinopathy as well as subsequent oxidative stress/inflammatory stress [191]. In summary, the future directions in AD therapy are likely to include hybrid-molecule strategies, expanded CNS-targeted delivery, and personalized treatments in KDs, along with collaboration with other therapeutic modalities [192]. All of these strategies describe a framework, shaped by the evolving understanding of AD, that will provide an adaptable intervention model for next-generation disease-modifying strategies as part of a multi-modal intervention that could lead to improved outcomes in AD [193].

11. Conclusions

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is still a significant global health concern with complex pathologies that include protein aggregation, oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and chronic neuroinflammation. Conventional therapies have insufficiently targeted disease progression, emphasizing the need for new, multi-level approaches. Combining antioxidant natural compounds with TPD, especially in the form of PROTACs, is a new way to develop therapeutic interventions in the treatment of AD. Antioxidants from natural products, including flavonoids, polyphenols, terpenoids, and alkaloids, can provide neuroprotective characteristics by scavenging for reactive oxygen species, modulating the Nrf2 signaling pathway, restoring mitochondrial function, and suppressing neuroinflammation. PROTACs, in contrast, can target the selective degradation of pathogenic proteins such as tau, amyloid-β, and APP fragments in a catalytic mode, addressing the main proteinopathies involved in AD.

Author Contributions

D.D.S. Conceptualization, validation, methodology, formal analysis, writing—original draft; D.D.S., D.K.Y. and D.S.: formal analysis, validation, investigation, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Visualization, original draft, writing, editing, and refining of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the National Research Foundation of Korea (grant numbers: RS-2020-NR049589 and RS-2025-00555975). This work was also supported by the Gachon University Research Fund of 2022 (GCU-202206050001).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate Biorender.com’s (Oct 2025) graphics assistance. D.D.S. acknowledges the DST-FIST-AIMT and DST-PURSE at Amity University, Rajasthan, India.

Conflicts of Interest

These authors declared that they had no conflicts of interest. The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Gaugler, J.; James, B.; Johnson, T.; Reimer, J.; Scales, K.; Tom, S.; Weuve, J.; Yeh, J. 2025 Alzheimer’s Disease Facts and Figures. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2025, 21, e70235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Liu, N.; Liang, X.; Chen, Y.; Xie, L. Recent Trends in Treatment Strategies for Alzheimer’s Disease and the Challenges: A Topical Advancement. Ageing Res. Rev. 2024, 94, 102199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Golde, T.E. Disease-Modifying Therapies for Alzheimer’s Disease: More Questions than Answers. Neurotherapeutics 2022, 19, 209–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, K.; Yang, R.; Li, J.; Wang, H.; Wan, L.; He, J. Nanocarrier-Based Targeted Drug Delivery for Alzheimer’s Disease: Addressing Neuroinflammation and Enhancing Clinical Translation. Front. Pharmacol. 2025, 16, 1591438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Briyal, S.; Ranjan, A.K.; Gulati, A. Oxidative Stress: A Target to Treat Alzheimer’s Disease and Stroke. Neurochem. Int. 2023, 165, 105509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kamaljeet; Singh, S.; Gupta, G.D.; Aran, K.R. Emerging Role of Antioxidants in Alzheimer’s Disease: Insight into Physiological, Pathological Mechanisms and Management. Pharm. Sci. Adv. 2024, 2, 100021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Theodosis-Nobelos, P.; Varra, F.-N.; Varras, M.; Papagiouvannis, G.; Rekka, E.A. Antioxidant Naturally Occurring Pleiotropically Acting Bioactive Compounds, as Polymeric Nanotherapeutics Against Autoimmune Diseases Progression. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2025, 47, 411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Balakrishnan, R.; Jannat, K.; Choi, D.-K. Development of Dietary Small Molecules as Multi-Targeting Treatment Strategies for Alzheimer’s Disease. Redox Biol. 2024, 71, 103105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Bondeson, D.P.; Crews, C.M. Targeted Protein Degradation by Small Molecules. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2017, 57, 107–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Pravin, N.; Jóźwiak, K. PROTAC Unleashed: Unveiling the Synthetic Approaches and Potential Therapeutic Applications. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2024, 279, 116837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Graham, H. The Mechanism of Action and Clinical Value of PROTACs: A Graphical Review. Cell. Signal. 2022, 99, 110446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hyun, S.; Shin, D. Chemical-Mediated Targeted Protein Degradation in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Life 2021, 11, 607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. He, Q.; Liu, J.; Liang, J.; Liu, X.; Li, W.; Liu, Z.; Ding, Z.; Tuo, D. Towards Improvements for Penetrating the Blood–Brain Barrier—Recent Progress from a Material and Pharmaceutical Perspective. Cells 2018, 7, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Pritam, P.; Deka, R.; Bhardwaj, A.; Srivastava, R.; Kumar, D.; Jha, A.K.; Jha, N.K.; Villa, C.; Jha, S.K. Antioxidants in Alzheimer’s Disease: Current Therapeutic Significance and Future Prospects. Biology 2022, 11, 212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Scarian, E.; Viola, C.; Dragoni, F.; Di Gerlando, R.; Rizzo, B.; Diamanti, L.; Gagliardi, S.; Bordoni, M.; Pansarasa, O. New Insights into Oxidative Stress and Inflammatory Response in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 2698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gong, Y.; Wang, S.; Chen, X.-B.; Yu, B. Utilizing Natural Products as New E3 Ligase Ligands for Targeted Protein Degradation. Chin. J. Nat. Med. 2023, 21, 881–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Newman, D.J.; Cragg, G.M. Natural Products as Sources of New Drugs over the Nearly Four Decades from 01/1981 to 09/2019. J. Nat. Prod. 2020, 83, 770–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Persson, T.; Popescu, B.O.; Cedazo-Minguez, A. Oxidative Stress in Alzheimer’s Disease: Why Did Antioxidant Therapy Fail? Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2014, 2014, 427318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Wang, S.; He, F.; Tian, C.; Sun, A. From PROTAC to TPD: Advances and Opportunities in Targeted Protein Degradation. Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hatami, M.; Mortazavi, M.; Baseri, Z.; Khani, B.; Rahimi, M.; Babaei, S. Antioxidant Compounds in the Treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease: Natural, Hybrid, and Synthetic Products. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2023, 2023, 8056462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sun, X.; Gao, H.; Yang, Y.; He, M.; Wu, Y.; Song, Y.; Tong, Y.; Rao, Y. PROTACs: Great Opportunities for Academia and Industry. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2019, 4, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Iliyasu, M.O.; Musa, S.A.; Oladele, S.B.; Iliya, A.I. Amyloid-Beta Aggregation Implicates Multiple Pathways in Alzheimer’s Disease: Understanding the Mechanisms. Front. Neurosci. 2023, 17, 1081938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wu, M.; Zhang, M.; Yin, X.; Chen, K.; Hu, Z.; Zhou, Q.; Cao, X.; Chen, Z.; Liu, D. The Role of Pathological Tau in Synaptic Dysfunction in Alzheimer’s Diseases. Transl. Neurodegener. 2021, 10, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Adamu, A.; Li, S.; Gao, F.; Xue, G. The Role of Neuroinflammation in Neurodegenerative Diseases: Current Understanding and Future Therapeutic Targets. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2024, 16, 1347987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gireud-Goss, M.; Mack, A.F.; McCullough, L.D.; Urayama, A. Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy and Blood-Brain Barrier Dysfunction. Neuroscientist 2021, 27, 668–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kamatham, P.T.; Shukla, R.; Khatri, D.K.; Vora, L.K. Pathogenesis, Diagnostics, and Therapeutics for Alzheimer’s Disease: Breaking the Memory Barrier. Ageing Res. Rev. 2024, 101, 102481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Farbota, K.D.; Sodhi, A.; Bendlin, B.B.; McLaren, D.G.; Xu, G.; Rowley, H.A.; Johnson, S.C. Longitudinal Volumetric Changes Following Traumatic Brain Injury: A Tensor-Based Morphometry Study. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 2012, 18, 1006–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Brennan, D.J.; Duda, J.; Ware, J.B.; Whyte, J.; Choi, J.Y.; Gugger, J.; Focht, K.; Walter, A.E.; Bushnik, T.; Gee, J.C.; et al. Spatiotemporal Profile of Atrophy in the First Year Following Moderate-severe Traumatic Brain Injury. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2023, 44, 4692–4709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Zhang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, J.; Xia, Y.; Zhang, J.; Chen, L. Recent Advances in Alzheimer’s Disease: Mechanisms, Clinical Trials and New Drug Development Strategies. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2024, 9, 211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Maggiore, A.; Latina, V.; D’Erme, M.; Amadoro, G.; Coccurello, R. Non-Canonical Pathways Associated to Amyloid Beta and Tau Protein Dyshomeostasis in Alzheimer’s Disease: A Narrative Review. Ageing Res. Rev. 2024, 102, 102578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Kim, G.H.; Kim, J.E.; Rhie, S.J.; Yoon, S. The Role of Oxidative Stress in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Exp. Neurobiol. 2015, 24, 325–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Reddy, P.H.; Oliver, D.M. Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Oxidative Stress in Alzheimer’s Disease: Pathogenesis and Therapeutic Interventions. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Minocha, T.; Birla, H.; Obaid, A.A.; Rai, V.; Sushma, P.; Shivamallu, C.; Moustafa, M.; Al-Shehri, M.; Al-Emam, A.; Tikhonova, M.A.; et al. Flavonoids as Promising Neuroprotectants and Their Therapeutic Potential against Alzheimer’s Disease. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2022, 2022, 6038996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yan, L.; Guo, M.-S.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, L.; Wu, J.-M.; Tang, Y.; Ai, W.; Zhu, F.-D.; Law, B.Y.-K.; Chen, Q.; et al. Dietary Plant Polyphenols as the Potential Drugs in Neurodegenerative Diseases: Current Evidence, Advances, and Opportunities. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2022, 2022, 5288698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Gong, L.; Yin, J.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, R.; Lou, Y.; Jiang, H.; Sun, L.; Jia, J.; Zeng, X. Neuroprotective Mechanisms of Ginsenoside Rb1 in Central Nervous System Diseases. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 914352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Friedli, M.J.; Inestrosa, N.C. Huperzine A and Its Neuroprotective Molecular Signaling in Alzheimer’s Disease. Molecules 2021, 26, 6531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Paul, R.; Mazumder, M.K.; Nath, J.; Deb, S.; Paul, S.; Bhattacharya, P.; Borah, A. Lycopene—A Pleiotropic Neuroprotective Nutraceutical: Deciphering Its Therapeutic Potentials in Broad Spectrum Neurological Disorders. Neurochem. Int. 2020, 140, 104823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Hou, D.; Liao, H.; Hao, S.; Liu, R.; Huang, H.; Duan, C. Curcumin Simultaneously Improves Mitochondrial Dynamics and Myocardial Cell Bioenergy after Sepsis via the SIRT1-DRP1/PGC-1α Pathway. Heliyon 2024, 10, e28501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jeong, H.; Park, J.; Kim, S.; Lee, J.W.; Lee, Y. Natural Compounds and Their Neuroprotective Roles in Alzheimer’s Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 12542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Baptista, F.I.; Henriques, A.G.; Silva, A.M.S.; Wiltfang, J.; Da Cruz E Silva, O.A.B. Flavonoids as Therapeutic Compounds Targeting Key Proteins Involved in Alzheimer’s Disease. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2014, 5, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ayala, A.; Muñoz, M.F.; Argüelles, S. Lipid Peroxidation: Production, Metabolism, and Signaling Mechanisms of Malondialdehyde and 4-Hydroxy-2-Nonenal. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2014, 2014, 360438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Islam, M.R.; Rauf, A.; Akash, S.; Trisha, S.I.; Nasim, A.H.; Akter, M.; Dhar, P.S.; Ogaly, H.A.; Hemeg, H.A.; Wilairatana, P.; et al. Targeted Therapies of Curcumin Focus on Its Therapeutic Benefits in Cancers and Human Health: Molecular Signaling Pathway-Based Approaches and Future Perspectives. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2024, 170, 116034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Yoo, K.-Y.; Park, S.-Y. Terpenoids as Potential Anti-Alzheimer’s Disease Therapeutics. Molecules 2012, 17, 3524–3538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chaturvedi, R.K.; Beal, M.F. Mitochondrial Approaches for Neuroprotection. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2008, 1147, 395–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Suvaiv; Singh, K.; Hasan, S.M.; Kumar, A.; Khan, A.; Shahanawaz, M.; Zaidi, S.M.H.; Verma, K. Huperzine A: A Natural Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitor with Multifunctional Neuroprotective Effects. Beni-Suef Univ. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2025, 14, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wang, R.; Yan, H.; Tang, X.C. Progress in Studies of Huperzine A, a Natural Cholinesterase Inhibitor from Huperzia serrata. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2006, 104, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Da Rosa, M.M.; De Amorim, L.C.; Alves, J.V.D.O.; Aguiar, I.F.D.S.; Oliveira, F.G.D.S.; Da Silva, M.V.; Dos Santos, M.T.C. The Promising Role of Natural Products in Alzheimer’s Disease. Brain Disord. 2022, 7, 100049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Rehman, M.U.; Wali, A.F.; Ahmad, A.; Shakeel, S.; Rasool, S.; Ali, R.; Rashid, S.M.; Madkhali, H.; Ganaie, M.A.; Khan, R. Neuroprotective Strategies for Neurological Disorders by Natural Products: An Update. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2019, 17, 247–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Sikder, M.M.; Li, X.; Akumwami, S.; Labony, S.A. Reactive Oxygen Species: Role in Pathophysiology, and Mechanism of Endogenous and Dietary Antioxidants during Oxidative Stress. Chonnam Med. J. 2025, 61, 32–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Li, X.; Wu, Z.; Si, X.; Li, J.; Wu, G.; Wang, M. The Role of Mitochondrial Dysfunction in the Pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s Disease and Future Strategies for Targeted Therapy. Eur. J. Med. Res. 2025, 30, 434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Alonso-Piñeiro, J.A.; Gonzalez-Rovira, A.; Sánchez-Gomar, I.; Moreno, J.A.; Durán-Ruiz, M.C. Nrf2 and Heme Oxygenase-1 Involvement in Atherosclerosis Related Oxidative Stress. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zahedipour, F.; Hosseini, S.; Henney, N.; Barreto, G.; Sahebkar, A. Phytochemicals as Inhibitors of Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha and Neuroinflammatory Responses in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Neural Regen. Res. 2022, 17, 1675–1684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Diaz-Vegas, A.; Sanchez-Aguilera, P.; Krycer, J.R.; Morales, P.E.; Monsalves-Alvarez, M.; Cifuentes, M.; Rothermel, B.A.; Lavandero, S. Is Mitochondrial Dysfunction a Common Root of Noncommunicable Chronic Diseases? Endocr. Rev. 2020, 41, bnaa005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Bieschke, J. Natural Compounds May Open New Routes to Treatment of Amyloid Diseases. Neurotherapeutics 2013, 10, 429–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Chen, M.; Du, Z.-Y.; Zheng, X.; Li, D.-L.; Zhou, R.-P.; Zhang, K. Use of Curcumin in Diagnosis, Prevention, and Treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease. Neural Regen. Res. 2018, 13, 742–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zimmermann, G.R.; Lehár, J.; Keith, C.T. Multi-Target Therapeutics: When the Whole Is Greater than the Sum of the Parts. Drug Discov. Today 2007, 12, 34–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Geldenhuys, W.J.; Mohammad, A.S.; Adkins, C.E.; Lockman, P.R. Molecular Determinants of Blood–Brain Barrier Permeation. Ther. Deliv. 2015, 6, 961–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Liu, Z.; Smart, J.D.; Pannala, A.S. Recent Developments in Formulation Design for Improving Oral Bioavailability of Curcumin: A Review. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2020, 60, 102082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Benameur, T.; Giacomucci, G.; Panaro, M.A.; Ruggiero, M.; Trotta, T.; Monda, V.; Pizzolorusso, I.; Lofrumento, D.D.; Porro, C.; Messina, G. New Promising Therapeutic Avenues of Curcumin in Brain Diseases. Molecules 2021, 27, 236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Liu, Z.; Hu, M. Natural Polyphenol Disposition via Coupled Metabolic Pathways. Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol. 2007, 3, 389–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Crawford, L.; Rosch, J.; Putnam, D. Concepts, Technologies, and Practices for Drug Delivery Past the Blood–Brain Barrier to the Central Nervous System. J. Control. Release 2016, 240, 251–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Liu, S.; Jin, X.; Ge, Y.; Dong, J.; Liu, X.; Pei, X.; Wang, P.; Wang, B.; Chang, Y.; Yu, X. Advances in Brain-Targeted Delivery Strategies and Natural Product-Mediated Enhancement of Blood–Brain Barrier Permeability. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2025, 23, 382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Goyal, R.; Mittal, P.; Gautam, R.K.; Kamal, M.A.; Perveen, A.; Garg, V.; Alexiou, A.; Saboor, M.; Haque, S.; Farhana, A.; et al. Natural Products in the Management of Neurodegenerative Diseases. Nutr. Metab. 2024, 21, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Eladl, O. Molecular Glues and PROTACs in Targeted Protein Degradation: Mechanisms, Advances, and Therapeutic Potential. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2025, 242, 117297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Pan, Y.; Wang, Y.; Gou, S. Proteolysis Targeting Chimera, Molecular Glue Degrader and Hydrophobic Tag Tethering Degrader for Targeted Protein Degradation: Mechanisms, Strategies and Application. Bioorg. Chem. 2025, 161, 108491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Alabi, S.B.; Crews, C.M. Major Advances in Targeted Protein Degradation: PROTACs, LYTACs, and MADTACs. J. Biol. Chem. 2021, 296, 100647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Amirian, R.; Badrbani, M.A.; Izadi, Z.; Samadian, H.; Bahrami, G.; Sarvari, S.; Abdolmaleki, S.; Nabavi, S.M.; Derakhshankhah, H.; Jaymand, M. Targeted Protein Modification as a Paradigm Shift in Drug Discovery. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2023, 260, 115765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zhong, G.; Chang, X.; Xie, W.; Zhou, X. Targeted Protein Degradation: Advances in Drug Discovery and Clinical Practice. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2024, 9, 308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Heim, C.; Pliatsika, D.; Mousavizadeh, F.; Bär, K.; Hernandez Alvarez, B.; Giannis, A.; Hartmann, M.D. De-Novo Design of Cereblon (CRBN) Effectors Guided by Natural Hydrolysis Products of Thalidomide Derivatives. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 62, 6615–6629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Madhukar, G.; Haque, M.A.; Khan, S.; Kim, J.-J. Danishuddin E3 Ubiquitin Ligases and Their Therapeutic Potential in Disease Management. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2025, 236, 116875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Schapira, M.; Calabrese, M.F.; Bullock, A.N.; Crews, C.M. Targeted Protein Degradation: Expanding the Toolbox. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2019, 18, 949–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Nalawansha, D.A.; Crews, C.M. PROTACs: An Emerging Therapeutic Modality in Precision Medicine. Cell Chem. Biol. 2020, 27, 998–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Farrell, K.; Jarome, T.J. Is PROTAC Technology Really a Game Changer for Central Nervous System Drug Discovery? Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 2021, 16, 833–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Agarwal, P.; Reid, D.L.; Amiji, M. CNS Delivery of Targeted Protein Degraders. J. Control. Release 2024, 372, 661–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Hersh, D.S.; Wadajkar, A.S.; Roberts, N.B.; Perez, J.G.; Connolly, N.P.; Frenkel, V.; Winkles, J.A.; Woodworth, G.F.; Kim, A.J. Evolving Drug Delivery Strategies to Overcome the Blood Brain Barrier. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2016, 22, 1177–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Abdul Razzak, R.; Florence, G.J.; Gunn-Moore, F.J. Approaches to CNS Drug Delivery with a Focus on Transporter-Mediated Transcytosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Wang, C.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, W.; Xu, J.; Xing, D. PROTAC-Biomacromolecule Conjugates for Precise Protein Degradation in Cancer Therapy: A Review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 261, 129864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Jevtić, P.; Haakonsen, D.L.; Rapé, M. An E3 Ligase Guide to the Galaxy of Small-Molecule-Induced Protein Degradation. Cell Chem. Biol. 2021, 28, 1000–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Kuemper, S.; Cairns, A.G.; Birchall, K.; Yao, Z.; Large, J.M. Targeted Protein Degradation in CNS Disorders: A Promising Route to Novel Therapeutics? Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2024, 17, 1370509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Dale, B.; Cheng, M.; Park, K.S.; Kaniskan, H.; Xiong, Y.; Jin, J. Advancing Targeted Protein Degradation for Cancer Therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2021, 21, 638–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Ozceylan, O.; Sezgin-Bayindir, Z. Current Overview on the Use of Nanosized Drug Delivery Systems in the Treatment of Neurodegenerative Diseases. ACS Omega 2024, 9, 35223–35242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Bond, M.J.; Crews, C.M. Proteolysis Targeting Chimeras (PROTACs) Come of Age: Entering the Third Decade of Targeted Protein Degradation. RSC Chem. Biol. 2021, 2, 725–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Wu, H.; Yao, H.; He, C.; Jia, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Xu, S.; Li, D.; Xu, J. Molecular Glues Modulate Protein Functions by Inducing Protein Aggregation: A Promising Therapeutic Strategy of Small Molecules for Disease Treatment. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2022, 12, 3548–3566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Ahn, G.; Banik, S.M.; Bertozzi, C.R. Degradation from the Outside in: Targeting Extracellular and Membrane Proteins for Degradation through the Endolysosomal Pathway. Cell Chem. Biol. 2021, 28, 1072–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Shao, J.; Xie, S.; Hong, S.; Qian, L. Autophagy-Mediated Targeted Protein Degradation. ChemMedChem 2025, 20, e202400866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Ding, Y.; Xing, D.; Fei, Y.; Luo, S.; Lu, B. Perspectives of Autophagy-Tethering Compounds (ATTECs) in Drug Discovery. Med. Plus 2024, 1, 100004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Roda, A.; Serra-Mir, G.; Montoliu-Gaya, L.; Tiessler, L.; Villegas, S. Amyloid-Beta Peptide and Tau Protein Crosstalk in Alzheimer’s Disease. Neural Regen. Res. 2022, 17, 1666–1674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Singh, S.; Nagalakshmi, D.; Sharma, K.K.; Ravichandiran, V. Natural Antioxidants for Neuroinflammatory Disorders and Possible Involvement of Nrf2 Pathway: A Review. Heliyon 2021, 7, e06216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Neklesa, T.K.; Winkler, J.D.; Crews, C.M. Targeted Protein Degradation by PROTACs. Pharmacol. Ther. 2017, 174, 138–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Thiruvengadam, R.; Kondapavuluri, B.K.; Thangavelu, L.; Thiruvengadam, M.; Hatami, M.; Kim, J.H. Nanoparticle-Based Strategies with Bioactive Compounds for Targeting Oxidative Stress in Therapeutic Interventions: A Comprehensive Review. Ind. Crops Prod. 2025, 227, 120804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Gadhave, D.G.; Sugandhi, V.V.; Jha, S.K.; Nangare, S.N.; Gupta, G.; Singh, S.K.; Dua, K.; Cho, H.; Hansbro, P.M.; Paudel, K.R. Neurodegenerative Disorders: Mechanisms of Degeneration and Therapeutic Approaches with Their Clinical Relevance. Ageing Res. Rev. 2024, 99, 102357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Jomova, K.; Raptova, R.; Alomar, S.Y.; Alwasel, S.H.; Nepovimova, E.; Kuca, K.; Valko, M. Reactive Oxygen Species, Toxicity, Oxidative Stress, and Antioxidants: Chronic Diseases and Aging. Arch. Toxicol. 2023, 97, 2499–2574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Hommen, F.; Bilican, S.; Vilchez, D. Protein Clearance Strategies for Disease Intervention. J. Neural Transm. 2022, 129, 141–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Kamila, P.; Kar, K.; Chowdhury, S.; Chakraborty, P.; Dutta, R.; Sowmiya, S.; Singh, S.A.; Prajapati, B.G. Effect of Neuroinflammation on the Progression of Alzheimer’s Disease and Its Significant Ramifications for Novel Anti-Inflammatory Treatments. IBRO Neurosci. Rep. 2025, 18, 771–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. D’Alessandro, M.C.B.; Kanaan, S.; Geller, M.; Praticò, D.; Daher, J.P.L. Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Alzheimer’s Disease. Ageing Res. Rev. 2025, 107, 102713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Halliwell, B. Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS), Oxygen Radicals and Antioxidants: Where Are We Now, Where Is the Field Going and Where Should We Go? Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2022, 633, 17–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Zhang, P.; Zhang, Z.; Li, J.; Xu, M.; Lu, W.; Chen, M.; Shi, J.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, H.; Huang, S.; et al. Advanced PROTAC and Quantitative Proteomics Strategy Reveals Bax Inhibitor-1 as a Critical Target of Icaritin in Burkitt Lymphoma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 12944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Du, X.; West, M.B.; Cheng, W.; Ewert, D.L.; Li, W.; Saunders, D.; Towner, R.A.; Floyd, R.A.; Kopke, R.D. Ameliorative Effects of Antioxidants on the Hippocampal Accumulation of Pathologic Tau in a Rat Model of Blast-Induced Traumatic Brain Injury. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2016, 2016, 4159357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Chen, G.; Xu, T.; Yan, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Melcher, K.; Xu, H.E. Amyloid Beta: Structure, Biology and Structure-Based Therapeutic Development. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2017, 38, 1205–1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Pellegrini, C.; Fornai, M.; Antonioli, L.; Blandizzi, C.; Calderone, V. Phytochemicals as Novel Therapeutic Strategies for NLRP3 Inflammasome-Related Neurological, Metabolic, and Inflammatory Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Ghosh, S.; Debnath, I.; Bhunia, S.; Nandi, S.; Ashique, S.; Nayak, A.; Mallick, S.; Basak, S. Decoding Natural Products for Neuroprotection: Pathway Networks and Structural Insights for Drug Development. Chin. Herb. Med. 2025, 17, S1674638425000942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Mukherjee, S.; Chopra, H.; Goyal, R.; Jin, S.; Dong, Z.; Das, T.; Bhattacharya, T. Therapeutic Effect of Targeted Antioxidant Natural Products. Discov. Nano 2024, 19, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Liu, Z.; Hu, M.; Yang, Y.; Du, C.; Zhou, H.; Liu, C.; Chen, Y.; Fan, L.; Ma, H.; Gong, Y.; et al. An Overview of PROTACs: A Promising Drug Discovery Paradigm. Mol. Biomed. 2022, 3, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Gulcin, İ. Antioxidants: A Comprehensive Review. Arch. Toxicol. 2025, 99, 1893–1997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Boualam, K.; Scialla, S.; Fasolino, I.; Russo, T.; Scarpa, E.; De Cesare, N.; Guarino, V.; De Santis, R.; Sobeh, M.; Taarji, N.; et al. Role of Natural Plant Extracts and Hyaluronic Acid Derivatives in Intranasal Strategies for Brain Delivery. A Review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 315, 144636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Dzobo, K. The Role of Natural Products as Sources of Therapeutic Agents for Innovative Drug Discovery. In Comprehensive Pharmacology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 408–422. ISBN 978-0-12-820876-2. [Google Scholar]
  107. Cai, Z.; Yang, Z.; Li, H.; Fang, Y. Research Progress of PROTACs for Neurodegenerative Diseases Therapy. Bioorg. Chem. 2024, 147, 107386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Syahputra, E.W.; Lee, H.; Cho, H.; Park, H.J.; Park, K.-S.; Hwang, D. PROTAC Delivery Strategies for Overcoming Physicochemical Properties and Physiological Barriers in Targeted Protein Degradation. Pharmaceutics 2025, 17, 501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Parodi, A.; Rudzińska, M.; Deviatkin, A.A.; Soond, S.M.; Baldin, A.V.; Zamyatnin, A.A. Established and Emerging Strategies for Drug Delivery Across the Blood-Brain Barrier in Brain Cancer. Pharmaceutics 2019, 11, 245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Lu, C.-T.; Zhao, Y.-Z.; Wong, H.L.; Cai, J.; Peng, L.; Tian, X.-Q. Current Approaches to Enhance CNS Delivery of Drugs across the Brain Barriers. Int. J. Nanomed. 2014, 9, 2241–2257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Scarano, N.; Musumeci, F.; Casini, B.; Brullo, C.; D’Ursi, P.; Fossa, P.; Schenone, S.; Cichero, E. Alzheimer’s Disease Etiology Hypotheses and Therapeutic Strategies: A Perspective. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 6980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Dias, V.; Junn, E.; Mouradian, M.M. The Role of Oxidative Stress in Parkinson’s Disease. J. Parkinson’s Dis. 2013, 3, 461–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Dong, Y.; Ma, T.; Xu, T.; Feng, Z.; Li, Y.; Song, L.; Yao, X.; Ashby, C.R.; Hao, G.-F. Characteristic Roadmap of Linker Governs the Rational Design of PROTACs. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2024, 14, 4266–4295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Zhou, Q.-Q.; Xiao, H.-T.; Yang, F.; Wang, Y.-D.; Li, P.; Zheng, Z.-G. Advancing Targeted Protein Degradation for Metabolic Diseases Therapy. Pharmacol. Res. 2023, 188, 106627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Hossain, M.S.; Hussain, M.H. Multi-Target Drug Design in Alzheimer’s Disease Treatment: Emerging Technologies, Advantages, Challenges, and Limitations. Pharmacol. Res. Perspect. 2025, 13, e70131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Ashok, A.; Andrabi, S.S.; Mansoor, S.; Kuang, Y.; Kwon, B.K.; Labhasetwar, V. Antioxidant Therapy in Oxidative Stress-Induced Neurodegenerative Diseases: Role of Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery Systems in Clinical Translation. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Zhou, Q.; Wang, W.; Deng, C. Advancements in Proteolysis Targeting Chimeras for Targeted Therapeutic Strategies in Alzheimer’s Disease. Mol. Neurobiol. 2025, 62, 9686–9709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Jin, Q.; Liu, T.; Qiao, Y.; Liu, D.; Yang, L.; Mao, H.; Ma, F.; Wang, Y.; Peng, L.; Zhan, Y. Oxidative Stress and Inflammation in Diabetic Nephropathy: Role of Polyphenols. Front. Immunol. 2023, 14, 1185317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Chen, X.; Drew, J.; Berney, W.; Lei, W. Neuroprotective Natural Products for Alzheimer’s Disease. Cells 2021, 10, 1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. He, C.; Tang, Z.; Tian, H.; Chen, X. Co-Delivery of Chemotherapeutics and Proteins for Synergistic Therapy. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2016, 98, 64–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Gregory, J.A.; Hickey, C.M.; Chavez, J.; Cacace, A.M. New Therapies on the Horizon: Targeted Protein Degradation in Neuroscience. Cell Chem. Biol. 2024, 31, 1688–1698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. De Lima, E.P.; Laurindo, L.F.; Catharin, V.C.S.; Direito, R.; Tanaka, M.; Jasmin Santos German, I.; Lamas, C.B.; Guiguer, E.L.; Araújo, A.C.; Fiorini, A.M.R.; et al. Polyphenols, Alkaloids, and Terpenoids Against Neurodegeneration: Evaluating the Neuroprotective Effects of Phytocompounds Through a Comprehensive Review of the Current Evidence. Metabolites 2025, 15, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Auten, R.; Davis, J. Oxygen Toxicity and Reactive Oxygen Species: The Devil Is in the Details. Pediatr. Res. 2009, 66, 121–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Nabi, A.E.; Pouladvand, P.; Liu, L.; Hua, Y.; Ayubcha, C. Machine Learning in Drug Development for Neurological Diseases: A Review of Blood Brain Barrier Permeability Prediction Models. Mol. Inform. 2025, 44, e202400325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Narayanankutty, A.; Famurewa, A.C.; Oprea, E. Natural Bioactive Compounds and Human Health. Molecules 2024, 29, 3372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Szymański, P.; Markowicz, M.; Mikiciuk-Olasik, E. Adaptation of High-Throughput Screening in Drug Discovery—Toxicological Screening Tests. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 13, 427–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Shah, C.; Nemaysh, V.; Althagafi, I.; Rai, R.; Yadav, D.K.; Pratap, R. Design, Synthesis and Computational Insight of Isolated and Thiophene fused 2H-Pyran-2-ones as PPAR-γ Agonist. ChemistrySelect 2024, 9, e202401900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Saeed, M.; Alkhathami, A.G.; Al-Keridis, L.; Alshammari, N.; Al-Amrah, H.; Farooqui, A.; Yadav, D.K. Integrative machine learning and molecular simulation strategies for BCR-ABL inhibition in chronic myeloid leukemia. J. King Saud Univ.-Sci. 2025, 37, 7792025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Thorne, N.; Auld, D.S.; Inglese, J. Apparent Activity in High-Throughput Screening: Origins of Compound-Dependent Assay Interference. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2010, 14, 315–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Velagapudi, R.; El-Bakoush, A.; Olajide, O.A. Activation of Nrf2 Pathway Contributes to Neuroprotection by the Dietary Flavonoid Tiliroside. Mol. Neurobiol. 2018, 55, 8103–8123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Rehman, A.U.; Li, M.; Wu, B.; Ali, Y.; Rasheed, S.; Shaheen, S.; Liu, X.; Luo, R.; Zhang, J. Role of Artificial Intelligence in Revolutionizing Drug Discovery. Fundam. Res. 2025, 5, 1273–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Srivastava, S.; Sinha, D.; Saha, P.P.; Marthala, H.; D’Silva, P. Magmas Functions as a ROS Regulator and Provides Cytoprotection against Oxidative Stress-Mediated Damages. Cell Death Dis. 2014, 5, e1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Nedaei, H.; Saboury, A.A.; Haghighi, Z.Z.; Ghasemi, A. Nile Red Compensates for Thioflavin T Assay Biased in the Presence of Curcumin. J. Lumin. 2018, 195, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Banerjee, T.D.; Reihl, K.; Swain, M.; Torres, M.; Dagda, R.K. Mitochondrial PKA Is Neuroprotective in a Cell Culture Model of Alzheimer’s Disease. Mol. Neurobiol. 2021, 58, 3071–3083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Astarita, G.; Kelly, R.S.; Lasky-Su, J. Metabolomics and Lipidomics Strategies in Modern Drug Discovery and Development. Drug Discov. Today 2023, 28, 103751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Ha, J.; Park, H.; Park, J.; Park, S.B. Recent Advances in Identifying Protein Targets in Drug Discovery. Cell Chem. Biol. 2021, 28, 394–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Yadav, D.K.; Rai, R.; Kumar, N.; Singh, S.; Misra, S.; Sharma, P.; Shaw, P.; Pérez-Sánchez, H.; Mancera, R.L.; Choi, E.H.; et al. New arylated benzo[h]quinolines induce anti-cancer activity by oxidative stress-mediated DNA damage. Sci Rep. 2016, 6, 38128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Huang, X.; Wu, F.; Ye, J.; Wang, L.; Wang, X.; Li, X.; He, G. Expanding the Horizons of Targeted Protein Degradation: A Non-Small Molecule Perspective. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2024, 14, 2402–2427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Huang, L.; Huang, X.-H.; Yang, X.; Hu, J.-Q.; Zhu, Y.-Z.; Yan, P.-Y.; Xie, Y. Novel Nano-Drug Delivery System for Natural Products and Their Application. Pharmacol. Res. 2024, 201, 107100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Zagidullin, A.; Milyukov, V.; Rizvanov, A.; Bulatov, E. Novel Approaches for the Rational Design of PROTAC Linkers. Explor. Target. Anti-Tumor Ther. 2020, 1, 381–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Poongavanam, V.; Atilaw, Y.; Siegel, S.; Giese, A.; Lehmann, L.; Meibom, D.; Erdelyi, M.; Kihlberg, J. Linker-Dependent Folding Rationalizes PROTAC Cell Permeability. J. Med. Chem. 2022, 65, 13029–13040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Mathur, V.; Jha, M.; Zai, I.; Mahajan, M.; Nazar, S.; Ali, S.; Ilyas, A.; Tanweer, S.; Ali, J.; Alam, O. Design and Development of PROTACs: A New Paradigm in Anticancer Drug Discovery. Med. Drug Discov. 2025, 27, 100221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Kirubakaran, D. Herbal Remedies for Alzheimer’s Disease: Neuroprotective Mechanisms and Cognitive Enhancement Potential. Digit. Chin. Med. 2025, 8, 183–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Abdul-Rahman, T.; Awuah, W.A.; Mikhailova, T.; Kalmanovich, J.; Mehta, A.; Ng, J.C.; Coghlan, M.A.; Zivcevska, M.; Tedeschi, A.J.; De Oliveira, E.C.; et al. Antioxidant, Anti-inflammatory and Epigenetic Potential of Curcumin in Alzheimer’s Disease. BioFactors 2024, 50, 693–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Shaito, A.; Al-Mansoob, M.; Ahmad, S.M.S.; Haider, M.Z.; Eid, A.H.; Posadino, A.M.; Pintus, G.; Giordo, R. Resveratrol-Mediated Regulation of Mitochondria Biogenesis-associated Pathways in Neurodegenerative Diseases: Molecular Insights and Potential Therapeutic Applications. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2023, 21, 1184–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Alam, M.; Gulzar, M.; Akhtar, M.S.; Rashid, S.; Zulfareen; Tanuja; Shamsi, A.; Hassan, M.I. Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate Therapeutic Potential in Human Diseases: Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Studies. Mol. Biomed. 2024, 5, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Bak, D.-H.; Kim, H.D.; Kim, Y.O.; Park, C.G.; Han, S.-Y.; Kim, J.-J. Neuroprotective Effects of 20(S)-Protopanaxadiol against Glutamate-Induced Mitochondrial Dysfunction in PC12 Cells. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2016, 37, 378–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Venigalla, M.; Gyengesi, E.; Münch, G. Curcumin and Apigenin—Novel and Promising Therapeutics against Chronic Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s Disease. Neural Regen. Res. 2015, 10, 1181–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Liu, T.; Shi, W.; Ding, Y.; Wu, Q.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, N.; Wang, M.; Du, D.; Zhang, H.; Han, B.; et al. (-)-Epigallocatechin Gallate Is a Noncompetitive Inhibitor of NAD Kinase. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2022, 13, 1699–1706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Singh, S.K.; Srivastav, S.; Castellani, R.J.; Plascencia-Villa, G.; Perry, G. Neuroprotective and Antioxidant Effect of Ginkgo Biloba Extract Against AD and Other Neurological Disorders. Neurotherapeutics 2019, 16, 666–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Sandhof, C.A.; Murray, H.F.B.; Silva, M.C.; Haggarty, S.J. Targeted Protein Degradation with Bifunctional Molecules as a Novel Therapeutic Modality for Alzheimer’s Disease & Beyond. Neurotherapeutics 2025, 22, e00499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Stefanis, L. α-Synuclein in Parkinson’s Disease. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2012, 2, a009399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Thomas, B.a.I.; Lewis, H.L.; Jones, D.H.; Ward, S.E. Central Nervous System Targeted Protein Degraders. Biomolecules 2023, 13, 1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Zhong, J.; Zhao, R.; Wang, Y.; Su, Y.-X.; Lan, X. Nano-PROTACs: State of the Art and Perspectives. Nanoscale 2024, 16, 4378–4391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Kurek-Górecka, A.; Rzepecka-Stojko, A.; Górecki, M.; Stojko, J.; Sosada, M.; Świerczek-Zięba, G. Structure and Antioxidant Activity of Polyphenols Derived from Propolis. Molecules 2013, 19, 78–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Sharma, A.; Srivastava, S.; Gupta, P.; Sridhar, S.B.; Tariq, M.; Rao, G.S.N.K.; Kumar, S.; Malik, T. Targeting Protein Misfolding in Alzheimer’s Disease: The Emerging Role of Molecular Chaperones. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2025, 191, 118531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Ege, D. Action Mechanisms of Curcumin in Alzheimer’s Disease and Its Brain Targeted Delivery. Materials 2021, 14, 3332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Khan, S.; Alhumaydhi, F.A.; Khan, M.S.; Abdulmonem, W.A.; Hassang, I.H.; Shami, A.; Yadav, D.K. Exploring binding mechanism of naringenin to human transferrin using combined spectroscopic and computational methods: Towards therapeutic targeting of neurodegenerative diseases. J. Mol. Liq. 2022, 356, 119001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Shamsi, A.; Furkan, M.; Khan, R.H.; Khan, M.S.; Shahwan, M.; Yadav, D.K. Comprehensive insight into the molecular interaction of rutin with human transferrin: Implication of natural compounds in neurodegenerative diseases. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 253 Pt 1, 126643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Singh, D.D.; Haque, S.; Singh, A.K.; Yadav, D.K. Advancing vaccine-based immunotherapy in glioblastoma treatment. Neurooncol. Adv. 2025, 7, vdaf135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Khan, M.S.; Yadav, D.K.; Shahwan, M.; Shamsi, A. Structure-Guided Identification and Evaluation of Epalrestat and Ranirestat-Like Compounds Against Aldose Reductase: Therapeutic Management of Diabetic Neuropathy. ChemistryOpen 2025, 22, e202500110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Cheng, D.H.; Ren, H.; Tang, X.C. Huperzine A, a Novel Promising Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitor. NeuroReport 1996, 8, 97–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Niki, E. Role of Vitamin E as a Lipid-Soluble Peroxyl Radical Scavenger: In Vitro and in Vivo Evidence. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2014, 66, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Shamsi, A.; Alrouji, M.; Yadav, D.K. Targeting Oxidative Stress in Neurodegeneration: Insights into Hordenine–Lactoferrin Interaction through In Silico and Spectroscopic Approaches. Free. Radic. Biol. Med. 2025, 240, S87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Tashima, T. Proteolysis-Targeting Chimera (PROTAC) Delivery into the Brain across the Blood-Brain Barrier. Antibodies 2023, 12, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Tyuryaeva, I.; Lyublinskaya, O. Expected and Unexpected Effects of Pharmacological Antioxidants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 9303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Sánchez, A.; Mejía, S.P.; Orozco, J. Recent Advances in Polymeric Nanoparticle-Encapsulated Drugs against Intracellular Infections. Molecules 2020, 25, 3760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Pancholi, B.; Choudhary, M.K.; Kumar, M.; Babu, R.; Vora, L.K.; Khatri, D.K.; Garabadu, D. Cell-Penetrating Proteins and Peptides as a Promising Theragnostic Agent for Neurodegenerative Disorder. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2025, 107, 106816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Fang, Y.; Wang, J.; Zhao, M.; Zheng, Q.; Ren, C.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, J. Progress and Challenges in Targeted Protein Degradation for Neurodegenerative Disease Therapy. J. Med. Chem. 2022, 65, 11454–11477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Békés, M.; Langley, D.R.; Crews, C.M. PROTAC Targeted Protein Degraders: The Past Is Prologue. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2022, 21, 181–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Wang, Y.; Jiang, X.; Feng, F.; Liu, W.; Sun, H. Degradation of Proteins by PROTACs and Other Strategies. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2020, 10, 207–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Sathe, G.; Sapkota, G.P. Proteomic Approaches Advancing Targeted Protein Degradation. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2023, 44, 786–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Liu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Li, H.; Hu, T.Y. Recent Advances in the Bench-to-Bedside Translation of Cancer Nanomedicines. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2025, 15, 97–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. EBioMedicine. Targeted Protein Degradation: Unlocking the Therapeutic Proteome. eBioMedicine 2018, 30, 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Nozohouri, S.; Sifat, A.E.; Vaidya, B.; Abbruscato, T.J. Novel Approaches for the Delivery of Therapeutics in Ischemic Stroke. Drug Discov. Today 2020, 25, 535–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Algorri, M.; Abernathy, M.J.; Cauchon, N.S.; Christian, T.R.; Lamm, C.F.; Moore, C.M.V. Re-Envisioning Pharmaceutical Manufacturing: Increasing Agility for Global Patient Access. J. Pharm. Sci. 2022, 111, 593–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Wang, X.; Dong, B.; Gan, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Li, H.; Chen, L.; Zhou, M.; Xu, J. Unraveling the Vicious Cycle: Oxidative Stress and Neurotoxicity in Neurodegenerative Diseases. FASEB Bioadv. 2025, 7, e70041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Kim, Y.; Kim, E.-K.; Chey, Y.; Song, M.-J.; Jang, H.H. Targeted Protein Degradation: Principles and Applications of the Proteasome. Cells 2023, 12, 1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Zhang, L.; Cao, K.; Xie, J.; Liang, X.; Gong, H.; Luo, Q.; Luo, H. Aβ42 and ROS Dual-Targeted Multifunctional Nanocomposite for Combination Therapy of Alzheimer’s Disease. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2024, 22, 278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Wilkinson, H.N.; Hardman, M.J. Wound Healing: Cellular Mechanisms and Pathological Outcomes. Open Biol. 2020, 10, 200223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Han, L. Modulation of the Blood–Brain Barrier for Drug Delivery to the Brain. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Grgić, J.; Šelo, G.; Planinić, M.; Tišma, M.; Bucić-Kojić, A. Role of the Encapsulation in Bioavailability of Phenolic Compounds. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Lajoie, J.M.; Shusta, E.V. Targeting Receptor-Mediated Transport for Delivery of Biologics Across the Blood-Brain Barrier. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2015, 55, 613–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Al Bostami, R.D.; Abuwatfa, W.H.; Husseini, G.A. Recent Advances in Nanoparticle-Based Co-Delivery Systems for Cancer Therapy. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 2672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Svob Strac, D.; Konjevod, M.; Sagud, M.; Nikolac Perkovic, M.; Nedic Erjavec, G.; Vuic, B.; Simic, G.; Vukic, V.; Mimica, N.; Pivac, N. Personalizing the Care and Treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease: An Overview. Pharmacogenom. Pers. Med. 2021, 14, 631–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Dogiparthi, L.K.; Bukke, S.P.N.; Thalluri, C.; Thalamanchi, B.; Vidya, K.P.; Sree, G.N.; Tatiparthi, H.; Uppicherla, D.; Thummaginjala, K.P. The Role of Genomics and Proteomics in Drug Discovery and Its Application in Pharmacy. Discov. Appl. Sci. 2025, 7, 552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Singh, B.; Day, C.M.; Abdella, S.; Garg, S. Alzheimer’s Disease Current Therapies, Novel Drug Delivery Systems and Future Directions for Better Disease Management. J. Control. Release 2024, 367, 402–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Angioni, D.; Middleton, L.; Bateman, R.; Aisen, P.; Boxer, A.; Sha, S.; Zhou, J.; Gerlach, I.; Raman, R.; Fillit, H.; et al. Challenges and Opportunities for Novel Combination Therapies in Alzheimer’s Disease: A Report from the EU/US CTAD Task Force. J. Prev. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2025, 12, 100163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Singh, D.D.; Han, I.; Choi, E.H.; Yadav, D.K. CRISPR/Cas9 based genome editing for targeted transcriptional control in triple-negative breast cancer. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 2021, 19, 2384–2397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Feng, X.; Hou, Y.; Liu, J.; Yan, F.; Dai, M.; Chen, M.; Wang, J.; Li, J.; Liu, Z.; Sun, D.; et al. A Multi-Targeting Immunotherapy Ameliorates Multiple Facets of Alzheimer’s Disease in 3xTg Mice. npj Vaccines 2024, 9, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  191. Dash, U.C.; Bhol, N.K.; Swain, S.K.; Samal, R.R.; Nayak, P.K.; Raina, V.; Panda, S.K.; Kerry, R.G.; Duttaroy, A.K.; Jena, A.B. Oxidative Stress and Inflammation in the Pathogenesis of Neurological Disorders: Mechanisms and Implications. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2025, 15, 15–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Peng, Y.; Jin, H.; Xue, Y.; Chen, Q.; Yao, S.; Du, M.; Liu, S. Current and Future Therapeutic Strategies for Alzheimer’s Disease: An Overview of Drug Development Bottlenecks. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2023, 15, 1206572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Yiannopoulou, K.G.; Papageorgiou, S.G. Current and Future Treatments in Alzheimer Disease: An Update. J. Cent. Nerv. Syst. Dis. 2020, 12, 117957352090739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Comparison of tau protein function in healthy and Alzheimer’s brains. (a) In a healthy brain, tau proteins stabilize microtubules, maintaining proper neuronal structure and transport. The microtubules remain intact, supporting healthy neuron function. (b) In Alzheimer’s disease, tau proteins become hyperphosphorylated and detach from microtubules, leading to their disintegration. The free tau proteins aggregate into neurofibrillary tangles, disrupting neuronal transport and contributing to neurodegeneration (Created in BioRender. Singh, D. (2025) https://BioRender.com/pzlt3uv; accessed on 29 October 2025).
Figure 1. Comparison of tau protein function in healthy and Alzheimer’s brains. (a) In a healthy brain, tau proteins stabilize microtubules, maintaining proper neuronal structure and transport. The microtubules remain intact, supporting healthy neuron function. (b) In Alzheimer’s disease, tau proteins become hyperphosphorylated and detach from microtubules, leading to their disintegration. The free tau proteins aggregate into neurofibrillary tangles, disrupting neuronal transport and contributing to neurodegeneration (Created in BioRender. Singh, D. (2025) https://BioRender.com/pzlt3uv; accessed on 29 October 2025).
Antioxidants 14 01426 g001
Figure 2. Role of natural antioxidants in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction play central roles in AD pathogenesis. Natural antioxidants—including flavonoids (quercetin, EGCG, luteolin), polyphenols (resveratrol, curcumin, ferulic acid), terpenoids (ginsenosides, bilobalide, ursolic acid), alkaloids (huperzine A, berberine), and others (carotenoids, vitamins C/E, coenzyme Q10)—exert neuroprotective effects via multiple mechanisms. These include ROS scavenging, Nrf2/ARE pathway activation, anti-inflammatory signaling (↓ TNF-α, IL-1β, NF-κB), mitochondrial protection (ATP production, membrane stabilization), and modulation of protein aggregation (Aβ, tau). Neuroprotective outcomes include reduced oxidative damage, enhanced neuronal survival, improved synaptic plasticity, and preservation of cognitive functions. However, challenges such as poor blood–brain barrier penetration, low oral bioavailability, and rapid metabolism limit their therapeutic potential. Future strategies involve nanocarriers/lipid formulations, synthetic derivatives with improved stability, and combination therapy with other modalities. (Created in BioRender. Singh, D. (2025) https://BioRender.com/pzlt3uv; accessed on 29 October 2025).
Figure 2. Role of natural antioxidants in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction play central roles in AD pathogenesis. Natural antioxidants—including flavonoids (quercetin, EGCG, luteolin), polyphenols (resveratrol, curcumin, ferulic acid), terpenoids (ginsenosides, bilobalide, ursolic acid), alkaloids (huperzine A, berberine), and others (carotenoids, vitamins C/E, coenzyme Q10)—exert neuroprotective effects via multiple mechanisms. These include ROS scavenging, Nrf2/ARE pathway activation, anti-inflammatory signaling (↓ TNF-α, IL-1β, NF-κB), mitochondrial protection (ATP production, membrane stabilization), and modulation of protein aggregation (Aβ, tau). Neuroprotective outcomes include reduced oxidative damage, enhanced neuronal survival, improved synaptic plasticity, and preservation of cognitive functions. However, challenges such as poor blood–brain barrier penetration, low oral bioavailability, and rapid metabolism limit their therapeutic potential. Future strategies involve nanocarriers/lipid formulations, synthetic derivatives with improved stability, and combination therapy with other modalities. (Created in BioRender. Singh, D. (2025) https://BioRender.com/pzlt3uv; accessed on 29 October 2025).
Antioxidants 14 01426 g002
Figure 3. Classification of antioxidants: Antioxidants are broadly classified into synthetic and natural categories. Synthetic antioxidants include nano-antioxidants (oxides, metallic nanoparticles, antioxidant-functionalized nanoparticles) and phenolic structures (BHA, BHT, TBHQ). Natural antioxidants are divided into endogenous and exogenous types. Exogenous antioxidants include vitamins (ascorbic acid, ascorbate, tocopherol, tocotrienol, retinol), trace minerals (Se, Zn, Cu, Mn, Fe), carotenoids (carotene, zeaxanthin, lutein, lycopene, carixanthin), and polyphenols (flavone, flavonol, flavanol, anthocyanin, phenolic acid). Endogenous antioxidants are further classified as nonenzymatic low molecular weight (lipophilic: lipoic acid, ubiquinol, ubiquinone, plasmalogen; hydrophilic: uric acid, bilirubin, melatonin, amino acids) and metal-binding proteins (ferritin, albumin, metallothionein, ceruloplasmin), and enzymatic antioxidants. Enzymatic systems comprise primary defense (catalase, superoxide dismutase [SOD], glutathione peroxidase [GPX]) and secondary defense systems (catalase, SOD, GPX). (Created in BioRender. Singh, D. (2025) https://BioRender.com/pzlt3uv).
Figure 3. Classification of antioxidants: Antioxidants are broadly classified into synthetic and natural categories. Synthetic antioxidants include nano-antioxidants (oxides, metallic nanoparticles, antioxidant-functionalized nanoparticles) and phenolic structures (BHA, BHT, TBHQ). Natural antioxidants are divided into endogenous and exogenous types. Exogenous antioxidants include vitamins (ascorbic acid, ascorbate, tocopherol, tocotrienol, retinol), trace minerals (Se, Zn, Cu, Mn, Fe), carotenoids (carotene, zeaxanthin, lutein, lycopene, carixanthin), and polyphenols (flavone, flavonol, flavanol, anthocyanin, phenolic acid). Endogenous antioxidants are further classified as nonenzymatic low molecular weight (lipophilic: lipoic acid, ubiquinol, ubiquinone, plasmalogen; hydrophilic: uric acid, bilirubin, melatonin, amino acids) and metal-binding proteins (ferritin, albumin, metallothionein, ceruloplasmin), and enzymatic antioxidants. Enzymatic systems comprise primary defense (catalase, superoxide dismutase [SOD], glutathione peroxidase [GPX]) and secondary defense systems (catalase, SOD, GPX). (Created in BioRender. Singh, D. (2025) https://BioRender.com/pzlt3uv).
Antioxidants 14 01426 g003
Figure 4. Mechanism of PROTAC-mediated targeted protein degradation. In the absence of PROTAC, E3 ubiquitin ligase cannot ubiquitinate distant target proteins. PROTACs (Proteolysis-Targeting Chimeras) are bifunctional molecules composed of an enzyme-binding domain, a protein-binding domain, and a linker that connects them. PROTACs facilitate the proximity of the E3 ligase and the target protein, allowing ubiquitination of the target protein. The ubiquitinated protein is subsequently recognized and degraded by the proteasome, leading to the selective removal of pathogenic or unwanted proteins (Created in BioRender. Singh, D. (2025) https://BioRender.com/pzlt3uv; accessed on 29 October 2025).
Figure 4. Mechanism of PROTAC-mediated targeted protein degradation. In the absence of PROTAC, E3 ubiquitin ligase cannot ubiquitinate distant target proteins. PROTACs (Proteolysis-Targeting Chimeras) are bifunctional molecules composed of an enzyme-binding domain, a protein-binding domain, and a linker that connects them. PROTACs facilitate the proximity of the E3 ligase and the target protein, allowing ubiquitination of the target protein. The ubiquitinated protein is subsequently recognized and degraded by the proteasome, leading to the selective removal of pathogenic or unwanted proteins (Created in BioRender. Singh, D. (2025) https://BioRender.com/pzlt3uv; accessed on 29 October 2025).
Antioxidants 14 01426 g004
Figure 5. Schematic representation of antioxidant–PROTAC integration strategies for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) therapy. (A) Antioxidant mechanisms: scavenging of reactive oxygen species (ROS), activation of the Nrf2 pathway, and metal chelation to mitigate oxidative stress. (B) PROTAC pathways: formation of a ternary complex between the protein of interest (POI) and E3 ligase leading to ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation, resulting in neuroprotection. (C) Integration models for AD: combining antioxidant and PROTAC mechanisms to reduce amyloid-β (Aβ) oligomers and aggregation. (D) Translational pipeline: progression from in vitro and in vivo validation to pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic evaluation and clinical biomarker assessment (Created in BioRender. Singh, D. (2025) https://BioRender.com/pzlt3uv; accessed on 29 October 2025).
Figure 5. Schematic representation of antioxidant–PROTAC integration strategies for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) therapy. (A) Antioxidant mechanisms: scavenging of reactive oxygen species (ROS), activation of the Nrf2 pathway, and metal chelation to mitigate oxidative stress. (B) PROTAC pathways: formation of a ternary complex between the protein of interest (POI) and E3 ligase leading to ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation, resulting in neuroprotection. (C) Integration models for AD: combining antioxidant and PROTAC mechanisms to reduce amyloid-β (Aβ) oligomers and aggregation. (D) Translational pipeline: progression from in vitro and in vivo validation to pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic evaluation and clinical biomarker assessment (Created in BioRender. Singh, D. (2025) https://BioRender.com/pzlt3uv; accessed on 29 October 2025).
Antioxidants 14 01426 g005
Table 1. Summary of major classes of neuroprotective agents, their representative compounds, underlying mechanisms of action, observed neuroprotective effects, and BBB penetration or bioavailability. Additional notes are included for specific pharmacological features, limitations, or therapeutic considerations, along with relevant references.
Table 1. Summary of major classes of neuroprotective agents, their representative compounds, underlying mechanisms of action, observed neuroprotective effects, and BBB penetration or bioavailability. Additional notes are included for specific pharmacological features, limitations, or therapeutic considerations, along with relevant references.
S.N.ClassRepresentative CompoundsMechanisms of ActionNeuroprotective EffectsBBB Penetration/BioavailabilityNotesReferences
1FlavonoidsQuercetin, Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), Luteolin, Kaempferol
Apigenin
ROS scavenging, Nrf2 activation, Anti-inflammatory, Mitochondrial protectionReduce Aβ aggregation, prevent tau hyperphosphorylation, and improve synaptic plasticityModerate; often limited by metabolism; enhanced via nano formulationsWidely studied in AD models; multiple in vitro and in vivo studies[33]
2PolyphenolsCurcumin, Resveratrol, Ferulic acid, CatechinsROS scavenging, Nrf2/ARE pathway, Anti-inflammatory, Protein aggregation inhibitionReduce oxidative stress, inhibit Aβ fibrillization, improve cognitionPoor oral bioavailability; BBB penetration low; improved by liposomes/nanoparticlesCurcumin and resveratrol are extensively studied; clinical translation limited by bioavailability[34]
3TerpenoidsGinsenosides, Bilobalide, Ursolic acidMitochondrial membrane stabilization, Anti-inflammatory, ROS reductionEnhance neuronal survival, restore mitochondrial function, improve memoryVariable; generally moderate BBB permeabilityGinsenosides improves mitochondrial potential; bilobalide supports synaptic function[35]
4AlkaloidsHuperzine A, Berberine, GalantamineROS scavenging, Anti-inflammatory, Cholinesterase inhibitionProtect against oxidative damage, enhance cholinergic signaling, and improve cognitive functionHuperzine A: good CNS penetration; Berberine: limitedHuperzine A is clinically approved in some regions; dual antioxidant and enzyme inhibition effects[36]
5Carotenoids and VitaminsLycopene, Lutein, Vitamin C, Vitamin E, Coenzyme Q10Lipid peroxidation prevention, ROS scavenging, and Mitochondrial supportStabilize membranes, reduce oxidative damage, support energy metabolismModerate to low BBB permeability; vitamin C and E cross with variable efficiencyOften used as dietary supplements, neuroprotective efficacy has been shown in animal models[37]
6Other Natural ProductsSulforaphane, and Curcuminoids Nrf2 activation, ROS scavenging, Anti-inflammatoryReduce oxidative stress, improve mitochondrial function, and modulate microglial activationVariable; sulforaphane shows good CNS availabilityEmerging compounds; require further preclinical validation[38]
Table 2. Integration of Antioxidants and PROTAC Pathways in Alzheimer’s Disease Therapy.
Table 2. Integration of Antioxidants and PROTAC Pathways in Alzheimer’s Disease Therapy.
CategoryMechanism/TargetMolecular EffectTherapeutic OutcomeIntegration Potential (Antiox–PROTAC Model)
Antioxidant MechanismsROS scavenging (e.g., SOD, catalase, glutathione)Reduces oxidative stress and lipid peroxidationProtects neuronal integrityAntioxidant PROTACs could stabilize redox balance and prevent protein misfolding
Mitochondrial ProtectionActivation of Nrf2/ARE pathwayEnhances antioxidant enzyme transcriptionImproves mitochondrial functionNrf2-activating PROTACs may promote clearance of damaged mitochondria
PROTAC PathwaysE3 ligase–mediated ubiquitinationInduces targeted protein degradationRemoves toxic proteins (Aβ, tau)Enables selective degradation of pathogenic aggregates
Integration ModelsDual-acting Antiox–PROTAC conjugatesCombines antioxidant and degradation functionsReduces Aβ load and oxidative damageProvides synergistic neuroprotection and disease modification
Translational OutlookIn vitro to in vivo validationAssesses efficacy, PK/PD, BBB permeabilitySupports therapeutic feasibilityPaves way for hybrid Antiox–PROTAC therapeutics in AD
Table 3. Summarizing targeted protein degradation (TPD) technologies, including PROTACs, molecular glues, and related modalities.
Table 3. Summarizing targeted protein degradation (TPD) technologies, including PROTACs, molecular glues, and related modalities.
S.N.TPD ModalityMechanismKey FeaturesRepresentative Targets/ExamplesAdvantagesLimitations/ChallengesReferences/NotesReferences
1PROTACs (Proteolysis-Targeting Chimeras)Bifunctional molecules recruit a target protein to an E3 ubiquitin ligase, leading to ubiquitination and proteasomal degradationConsist of a target-binding ligand, E3 ligase ligand, and a linker; catalytic mechanism; can degrade “undruggable” proteinsTau, Amyloid-β, α-synuclein, BRD4, BCL-2Sub-stoichiometric dosing, high selectivity, target protein clearance rather than inhibitionLarge molecular weight; poor BBB permeability; linker optimization critical; potential off-target degradationWidely used in oncology; CNS applications emerging; hybrid designs with natural products are under exploration[82]
2Molecular GluesSmall molecules stabilize the interaction between an E3 ligase and target protein, leading to degradationSingle, small-molecule drug; does not require linker; often discovered serendipitouslyIKZF1/3 (thalidomide, lenalidomide), CDK12, GSPT1Simplified chemistry compared to PROTACs; can engage proteins lacking high-affinity ligandsTarget discovery challenging; requires compatible E3 ligase interface; off-target effects possibleFDA-approved examples exist (thalidomide derivatives); CNS applications limited[83]
3LYTACs (Lysosome-Targeting Chimeras)Direct extracellular or membrane proteins to lysosomes via receptor-mediated endocytosisUses glycan-based ligands to engage lysosomal trafficking receptorsEGFR, PD-L1Enables degradation of extracellular or membrane proteins not accessible to proteasomeLimited CNS penetration; relatively large molecules; receptor expression dependencyEmerging modality; potential for targeting AD-related extracellular aggregates[84]
4AUTACs (Autophagy-Targeting Chimeras)Tags target proteins for autophagic degradation via K63-linked ubiquitinationCan degrade cytosolic aggregates and damaged organellesMisfolded tau, damaged mitochondriaAccess to larger or aggregated proteins; organelle-targeted degradationMechanism still under investigation; slower degradation kinetics than PROTACsPreclinical stage; potential synergy with antioxidant pathways[85]
5ATTECs (Autophagosome-Tethering Compounds)Tethers target proteins directly to autophagosomes for selective autophagyDoes not rely on ubiquitination; small molecule tethermHTT (Huntingtin), aggregated tauCan target aggregated or insoluble proteinsEarly development: CNS delivery remains a challengeDemonstrated in Huntington’s and AD models; proof-of-concept studies[86]
Table 5. Pipeline Stages, Methodologies, and Readouts in Preclinical Neurotherapeutic Studies.
Table 5. Pipeline Stages, Methodologies, and Readouts in Preclinical Neurotherapeutic Studies.
S.N.Pipeline StageDescription/MethodologyReadouts/AssaysPurpose/OutcomeExamples/NotesReferences
1Library SelectionCompilation of natural product libraries rich in antioxidants, including flavonoids, polyphenols, terpenoids, alkaloids, and carotenoidsChemical diversity assessment, structural classificationIdentify a broad pool of candidate compounds with potential neuroprotective activityCommercial natural product libraries; curated botanical extracts; in-house isolated compounds[125]
2High-Throughput Screening (HTS)Automated screening platforms using multi-well plates, robotics, and fluorescence/luminescence readoutsROS scavenging (DCFDA, MitoSOX), Aβ/tau aggregation inhibition (ThT binding), cytotoxicity (MTT, LDH release)Rapid identification of compounds with antioxidant and anti-aggregation potential384- or 1536-well plate formats; fluorescence-based kinetic assays[126]
3Computational Pre-ScreeningIn silico docking and predictive modeling to assess target engagement, BBB permeability, and ADMET propertiesMolecular docking scores, predictive BBB permeability, Lipinski’s rule-of-five, toxicity predictionsPrioritize compounds with favorable pharmacokinetics and CNS bioavailability before experimental screeningSoftware: AutoDock (4.2.6), Schrödinger (2025-4), ADMET predictor 11.0; reduces experimental load[127]
4Hit IdentificationSelection of compounds meeting threshold activity in primary HTSROS inhibition > 50%, aggregation inhibition > 50%, low cytotoxicityLeads are advanced for mechanistic validationHits often include curcumin, EGCG, quercetin, resveratrol, ginsenosides[128]
5Secondary ValidationDose–response studies, orthogonal assays, and target specificity confirmationConcentration-dependent ROS reduction, aggregation kinetics, neuronal viability, mitochondrial assaysConfirm reproducibility and specificity of hits; eliminate false positivesMultiple cell lines, including primary neurons, SH-SY5Y cells, and iPSC-derived neurons[129]
5Mechanistic ProfilingInvestigation of pathways engaged by lead compoundsNrf2/ARE activation, anti-inflammatory signaling, mitochondrial function assaysDetermine pleiotropic neuroprotective mechanisms to guide further developmentWestern blot, qPCR, ROS imaging, Seahorse mitochondrial analysis[130]
6Lead Selection for PROTAC DevelopmentIntegration of chemical and biological data to select compounds suitable as PROTAC warheads or scaffoldsConsider BBB penetration, potency, target engagement, and antioxidant activityIdentify candidates for hybrid antioxidant-PROTAC designStructural features (hydroxyls, phenolic groups) may facilitate linker attachment[130]
Table 6. Summary of preclinical evidence of natural antioxidant leads with cognitive and neuroprotective effects in Alzheimer’s disease models.
Table 6. Summary of preclinical evidence of natural antioxidant leads with cognitive and neuroprotective effects in Alzheimer’s disease models.
SN.Natural CompoundClassModel SystemsMechanisms of ActionNeuroprotective/Cognitive EffectsBBB Penetration/BioavailabilityNotesReferences
1CurcuminPolyphenolTransgenic AD mice (APP/PS1), primary neuronsROS scavenging, Nrf2 activation, inhibition of Aβ aggregation, tau hyperphosphorylation suppressionReduces amyloid plaques, decreases tau phosphorylation, and improves spatial learning and memoryPoor oral bioavailability; enhanced by nano formulations or liposomesWidely studied; dual antioxidant and anti-aggregation activity[157]
2ResveratrolPolyphenolTg2576 mice, SH-SY5Y cellsActivates SIRT1, Nrf2 pathway, mitochondrial biogenesis, and anti-inflammatoryReduces oxidative stress, improves synaptic plasticity, and enhances learning and memoryLow bioavailability; CNS penetration moderate; nanoencapsulation improves deliveryNeuroprotective and anti-inflammatory; synergistic with other polyphenols[158]
3QuercetinFlavonoid3xTg-AD mice, primary cortical neuronsROS scavenging, Nrf2 activation, anti-inflammatory, inhibition of Aβ aggregationImproves memory performance, reduces neuroinflammation, and prevents neuronal apoptosisModerate BBB permeability; metabolized rapidlyUsed in combination with other flavonoids for enhanced efficacy[159]
4Epigallocatechin Gallate (EGCG)FlavonoidAPP/PS1 mice, SH-SY5Y cellsAntioxidative, inhibits Aβ fibrillization, anti-inflammatory, and mitochondrial protectionReduces amyloid plaques, preserves synaptic function, enhances cognitionModerate; low oral bioavailability; improved via nanoparticlesGreen tea polyphenol: well-documented neuroprotective effects[160]
5Ginsenosides (Rb1, Rg1)TerpenoidAD rat and mouse modelsMitochondrial membrane stabilization, ROS reduction, neurotrophic signalingEnhances neuronal survival, improves learning/memory, restores mitochondrial functionModerate; variable depending on compound; can cross BBBShow multi-targeted neuroprotection; often used in combination with other compounds[161]
6Huperzine AAlkaloidAPP/PS1 mice, scopolamine-induced memory impairmentROS scavenging, acetylcholinesterase inhibition, and anti-inflammatoryEnhances cholinergic signaling, protects neurons, and improves spatial memoryGood CNS penetration; clinically approved in some regionsDual action: antioxidant and enzyme inhibition[162]
7Vitamin E (α-tocopherol)Vitamin/CarotenoidAPP/PS1 mice, aged ratsLipid peroxidation prevention, ROS scavengingReduces oxidative stress, slows cognitive declineModerate; crosses BBBWidely used in supplementation studies; often combined with other antioxidants[163]
8Coenzyme Q10QuinoneTransgenic AD mice, primary neuronsMitochondrial support, ROS scavengingPreserves mitochondrial function, reduces neuronal apoptosis, and improves cognitionModerate; CNS penetration limited; improved by formulationsSupports energy metabolism; synergistic with other antioxidants[164]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Singh, D.D.; Yadav, D.K.; Shin, D. Antioxidant Natural Compounds Integrated with Targeted Protein Degradation: A Multi-Modal Strategy for Alzheimer’s Disease Therapy. Antioxidants 2025, 14, 1426. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox14121426

AMA Style

Singh DD, Yadav DK, Shin D. Antioxidant Natural Compounds Integrated with Targeted Protein Degradation: A Multi-Modal Strategy for Alzheimer’s Disease Therapy. Antioxidants. 2025; 14(12):1426. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox14121426

Chicago/Turabian Style

Singh, Desh Deepak, Dharmendra Kumar Yadav, and Dongyun Shin. 2025. "Antioxidant Natural Compounds Integrated with Targeted Protein Degradation: A Multi-Modal Strategy for Alzheimer’s Disease Therapy" Antioxidants 14, no. 12: 1426. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox14121426

APA Style

Singh, D. D., Yadav, D. K., & Shin, D. (2025). Antioxidant Natural Compounds Integrated with Targeted Protein Degradation: A Multi-Modal Strategy for Alzheimer’s Disease Therapy. Antioxidants, 14(12), 1426. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox14121426

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop