Next Article in Journal
Optical Transmitters without Driver Amplifiers—Optimal Operation Conditions
Previous Article in Journal
Enabling Technologies for Operator 4.0: A Survey
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cartilage Differentiation of Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Three-Dimensional Silica Nonwoven Fabrics
Article Menu
Issue 9 (September) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessBrief Report
Appl. Sci. 2018, 8(9), 1651; https://doi.org/10.3390/app8091651

3D Printed Antibacterial Prostheses

1
Department of Biomechanics, University of Nebraska, Omaha, NE 68182, USA
2
Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Santiago, Chile
Received: 21 July 2018 / Revised: 4 September 2018 / Accepted: 12 September 2018 / Published: 14 September 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biocompatible Materials)
Full-Text   |   PDF [1787 KB, uploaded 14 September 2018]   |  

Abstract

The purpose of the current investigation was two-fold: (i) to describe the development of 3D printed prostheses using antibacterial filaments and (ii) to verify the antibacterial properties of the 3D printed prostheses. Three-dimensional printed finger prostheses were manufactured using PLACTIVETM antibacterial 3D printing filaments. Two adults with left index finger amputations at the proximal phalanx were fitted with a customized 3D printed finger prosthesis manufactured with an antibacterial filament. The manual gross dexterity was assessed during the Box and Block Test. Patient satisfaction was assessed using the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0). Bacterial analysis of the 3D printed prostheses was performed by two independent laboratories against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli (ISO 22196). Two customized 3D printed partial finger prostheses were manufactured using a 3D printed antibacterial filament. The bacterial analysis showed that PLACTIVETM with 1% antibacterial nanoparticles additives was up to 99.99% effective against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. The manual gross dexterity assessed was improved after using the 3D printed partial finger prosthesis. The research subjects indicated that they were “quite satisfied” to “very satisfied” with the 3D printed partial finger prosthesis. The present investigation showed that the antibacterial 3D printed filament can be used for the development of functional and effective antibacterial finger prostheses. View Full-Text
Keywords: antimicrobial material; biocompatible material; 3D printing filament; additive manufacturing; orthoses; rapid prototyping; upper-limb prosthetics; prosthetic design antimicrobial material; biocompatible material; 3D printing filament; additive manufacturing; orthoses; rapid prototyping; upper-limb prosthetics; prosthetic design
Figures

Graphical abstract

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Zuniga, J.M. 3D Printed Antibacterial Prostheses. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 1651.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Appl. Sci. EISSN 2076-3417 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top