Exploring the Visibility Gap Between Public Investment and Media Discourse in the Wrocław Participatory Budget
Abstract
1. Introduction
1.1. The City as an Information System and the Role of Local Media
1.2. Wrocław Participatory Budget as a Tool of Participatory Democracy
1.3. Perception Gap Between the Investment Map and Media Discourse
1.4. Research Aim, Questions and Hypotheses
- Geospatial data on investments, extracted from the Spatial Information System of the City of Wrocław (SIP).
- Textual data, derived from a corpus of articles published by a major local newspaper in Wrocław.
1.5. Contribution and Position in the Literature
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area and Institutional Context
2.2. Data Sources
2.2.1. Municipal Investment Database (SIP Wrocław)
2.2.2. Media Corpus from Local News Articles from Wrocław
2.2.3. Additional Spatial Data
- Official administrative division in Wrocław obtained from the publicly available database of the Spatial Information System of Wrocław. This collection contains the exact contours of settlement boundaries in shapefile format. This layer served an analytical function in the study, allowing aggregation of point data (investment locations) to the level of administrative units. This allowed us to examine the density of media mentions and identify disparities in the “visibility” of individual neighborhoods.
- Urban topology and map background (OpenStreetMap). In order to visualize the results against the actual urban structure, the OpenStreetMap (OSM) project’s open mapping data was used. They were implemented in the form of map tiles that constitute the background layer. The use of a detailed underlay of streets, green areas and urban infrastructure made it possible to interpret the location of investments in the context of the city’s morphology, facilitating the orientation of Wrocław’s topography.
2.3. Analytical Workflow
2.4. Scheme of Articles Related to Wrocław
2.5. Extraction and Geoparsing of Locations in the Media Corpus
2.6. Geocoding of Municipal Investments
2.7. Matching Articles to Investments
2.8. Sentiment Analysis of Articles
2.9. Indicators and Visualizations
2.10. Validation and Limitations
3. Results
3.1. Spatial Patterns of Media Activity in Wrocław—Density of Location Mentions
3.2. Visibility of WPB Projects in the Media Corpus—Share of Projects Covered by the Media
3.3. Spatial Distribution of Visibility: “Islands of Attention” and “Media Deserts”
3.4. Temporal Dynamics of Discourse—Timing of Articles with Respect to the Investment Life-Cycle
3.5. Distribution of Sentiment in Articles on WPB Investments
3.6. Sentiment Differences Across WPB Project Categories
3.7. Road and Infrastructure Projects
3.8. Green Projects
3.9. Sports and Other Projects
4. Discussion
4.1. Spatial and Temporal Asymmetry in Public Discourse
4.2. Local Media and Spatial Digital Inequalities
4.3. Sentiment of Life-Cycle and Social Acceptance of Urban Investments
4.4. Value of Integrating GIS and NLP in Participatory Budgeting Research
4.5. Limitations and Directions for Methodological Improvement
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
- Google Gemini (gemini-1.5-pro, accessed [September 2025])
- OpenAI (gpt-4o-mini, accessed [September 2025])
- Original (Polish):
- “Jesteś ekstraktorem lokalizacji z tekstów po polsku.
- Zwracasz wyłącznie JSON: {“is_Wrocław_related”: true|false, “locations”: [“…”,”…”]}
- Interesuje nas tylko Wrocław (ulice, place, mosty, dzielnice/osiedla, obiekty).
- Jeśli brak powiązania z Wrocławiem: is_Wrocław_related=false i locations=[].”
- English (translation):
- “You are a location extractor for Polish-language texts.
- Return JSON only: {‘is_Wrocław_related’: true|false, ‘locations’: [‘…’, ‘…’]}.
- We are interested only in Wrocław (streets, squares, bridges, districts/neighbourhoods, and landmarks).
- If there is no relation to Wrocław, set is_Wrocław_related=false and locations=[].”
- Wrocław-relatedness (binary document-level classification),
- Presence of at least one correct location within the administrative boundaries of Wrocław.
- Precision = 0.918
- Recall = 0.900
- F1-score = 0.909
- Accuracy = 0.909
- Precision = 0.933
- Recall = 0.913
- F1-score = 0.923
| Gold Positive | Gold Negative | |
|---|---|---|
| System positive | 46 | 4 |
| System negative | 5 | 45 |
| Gold: ≥1 Correct Location | Gold: No Correct Location | |
|---|---|---|
| System: ≥1 correct | 43 | 3 |
| System: no correct | 4 | - |
Appendix B
Validation of the Matching Pipeline
- 90 randomly selected articles from the corpus to reflect the general distribution of topics.
- 5 articles manually identified as containing specific mentions of WPB projects (to test Recall).
- 5 articles identified as “near-misses”—mentioning locations associated with projects (e.g., a specific park or street name) but not the investments themselves (to test Precision/False Positives).
- 5 projects manually selected because they were known to have media coverage (corresponding to the 5 positive articles mentioned above).
- 5 projects selected randomly from the WPB database to ensure the system does not generate “hallucinated” links for less-publicized investments.
| System Positive | System Negative | |
|---|---|---|
| Gold positive | 4 | 2 |
| Gold negative | 1 | 93 |
- Precision = 0.67.
- Recall = 0.8.
- F1-score = 0.73.
- Accuracy = 0.97.
- False Positives: Occurred primarily when an article discussed a specific street or park (the location of a WPB project) in a general context (e.g., municipal maintenance or different city investments) without mentioning the specific participatory budget project.
- False Negatives: The single omission was due to a highly non-standard description of the project in the media text, which the keyword-based algorithm failed to link to the official project title.
Appendix C
Validation of the Sentiment Analysis Pipeline
- XLM-T model (twitter-XLM-RoBERTa-base-sentiment).
- Accuracy = 0.84
| XLM-T: Positive | XLM-T: Neutral | XLM-T: Negative | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manual: Positive | 25 | 0 | 0 |
| Manual: Neutral | 1 | 35 | 12 |
| Manual: Negative | 1 | 2 | 24 |
References
- Batty, M. The New Science of Cities; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Thisse, J.-F. The New Science of Cities by Michael Batty: The opinion of an economist. J. Econ. Lit. 2014, 52, 805–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Castells, M. The Rise of the Network Society; Blackwell: Oxford, UK, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Resch, B.; Summa, A.; Sagl, G.; Zeile, P.; Exner, J.P. Urban Emotions—Geo-semantic emotion extraction from technical sensors, human sensors and crowdsourced data. In Progress in Location-Based Services 2014; Gartner, G., Huang, H., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 199–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Shelton, T.; Poorthuis, A.; Zook, M. Social media and the city: Rethinking urban socio-spatial inequality using user-generated geographic information. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2015, 142, 198–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kębłowski, W.; Van Criekingen, M. How “alternative” alternative urban policies really are? The case of participatory budgeting in Polish cities. Métropoles 2014, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa (NID). Placemaking Jako Metoda Pracy z Lokalną Społecznością. Available online: https://samorzad.nid.pl/baza_wiedzy/placemaking-jako-metoda-pracy-z-lokalna-spolecznoscia (accessed on 18 December 2025).
- Smaniotto Costa, C.; García-Esparza, J.A.; Kimic, K. Participatory Budgeting and Placemaking: Concepts, Methods, and Practices. Urban Plan. 2024, 9, 7162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Vliegenthart, R.; Walgrave, S. The contingency of intermedia agenda setting: A longitudinal study in Belgium. J. Mass Commun. Q. 2008, 85, 860–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Djokić, V.; Djordjević, A.; Milovanović, A. Big data and urban form: A systematic review. J. Big Data 2025, 12, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Cai, M. Natural language processing for urban research: A systematic review. Heliyon 2021, 7, e06322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Jayedi, A.; Matisziw, T.C. Urban sentiment mapping using language and vision models in spatial analysis. Front. Comput. Sci. 2025, 7, 1504523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Liu, X.; Shuang, Q.; Xu, X.; Zheng, Z. A Spatiotemporal Analytical Framework for Dynamic Public Opinion and Sentiment Analysis on Mega Infrastructure Project. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 2025. ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bollen, J.; Mao, H.; Pepe, A. Modeling Public Mood and Emotion: Twitter Sentiment and Socio-Economic Phenomena. In Proceedings of the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM 2011), Barcelona, Spain, 17–21 July 2011; pp. 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bednarska-Olejniczak, D.; Olejniczak, J. Participatory budget of Wrocław as an element of Smart City 3.0 concept. In XIX. Mezinárodní Kolokvium o Regionálních Vědách; Masarykova univerzita: Brno, Czech Republic, 2016; pp. 746–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Skrzypczyński, R. Wrocław Civic Budget as a tool for introducing changes into the landscapes of Wrocław’s neighbourhoods. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 960, 042010. [Google Scholar]
- Pak, A.; Paroubek, P. Twitter as a Corpus for Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’10), Valletta, Malta, 17–23 May 2010; pp. 1320–1326. [Google Scholar]
- Nadeau, D.; Sekine, S. A Survey of Named Entity Recognition and Classification. Lingvisticae Investig. 2007, 30, 3–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Goldberg, D.W.; Wilson, J.P.; Knoblock, C.A. From text to geographic coordinates: The current state of geocoding. URISA J. 2007, 19, 33–46. [Google Scholar]
- Salton, G.; Wong, A.; Yang, C.S. A vector space model for automatic indexing. Commun. ACM 1975, 18, 613–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Mroczkowski, R.; Rybak, P.; Wróblewska, A.; Gawlik, I. HerBERT: Efficiently Pretrained Transformer-based Language Model for Polish. In Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on Balto-Slavic Natural Language Processing; Association for Computational Linguistics: Kyiv, Ukraine, 2021; pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- Barbieri, F.; Espinosa Anke, L.; Camacho-Collados, J. XLM-T: Multilingual Language Models in Twitter for Sentiment Analysis and Beyond. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference; European Language Resources Association: Marseille, France, 2022; pp. 258–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Galtung, J.; Ruge, M.H. The Structure of Foreign News. J. Peace Res. 1965, 2, 64–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Fang, J.; Huang, D.; Xu, J. Social Risk Early Warning of Environmental Damage of Large-Scale Construction Projects in China Based on Network Governance and LSTM Model. Complexity 2020, 2020, 8863997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Chua, A.; Servillo, L.; Marcheggiani, E.; Vande Moere, A. Mapping Cilento: Using geotagged social media data to characterize tourist flows in southern Italy. Tour. Manag. 2016, 57, 295–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Napoli, P.M.; Stonbely, S.; McCollough, K.; Renninger, B. Local Journalism and the Information needs of Local Communities. J. Pract. 2016, 11, 373–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bailey, K.; Grossardt, T. Toward Structured Public Involvement: Justice, Geography and Collaborative Geospatial/Geovisual Decision Support Systems. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 2010, 100, 57–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gilbert, M.R. Theorizing Digital and Urban Inequalities. Inf. Commun. Soc. 2010, 13, 1000–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wolsink, M. Wind Power Implementation: The Nature of Public Attitudes: Equity and Fairness Instead of ‘Backyard Motives’. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2007, 11, 1188–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Devine-Wright, P. Rethinking NIMBYism: The Role of Place Attachment and Place Identity in Explaining Place-Protective Action. J. Community Appl. Soc. Psychol. 2009, 19, 426–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Vasdev, K. Integrating GIS with Natural Language Processing for Location-Based Insights. Int. J. Multidiscip. Res. 2024, 6, 23437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shin, B. Residents’ Voices on Proposals: Analysing a Participatory Budgeting Project in Seoul Using Topic Modelling. In Electronic Participation; Edelmann, N., Danneels, L., Novak, A.-S., Panagiotopoulos, P., Susha, I., Eds.; Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; Volume 14153, pp. 50–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Nummi, P. Social Media Data Analysis in Urban e-Planning. Int. J. E-Plan. Res. 2017, 6, 18–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]






Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Mierzejewski, P.; Tomczyk, K.; Chrobak, G.; Kaczmarek, I. Exploring the Visibility Gap Between Public Investment and Media Discourse in the Wrocław Participatory Budget. Appl. Sci. 2026, 16, 2265. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16052265
Mierzejewski P, Tomczyk K, Chrobak G, Kaczmarek I. Exploring the Visibility Gap Between Public Investment and Media Discourse in the Wrocław Participatory Budget. Applied Sciences. 2026; 16(5):2265. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16052265
Chicago/Turabian StyleMierzejewski, Patryk, Klaudiusz Tomczyk, Grzegorz Chrobak, and Iwona Kaczmarek. 2026. "Exploring the Visibility Gap Between Public Investment and Media Discourse in the Wrocław Participatory Budget" Applied Sciences 16, no. 5: 2265. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16052265
APA StyleMierzejewski, P., Tomczyk, K., Chrobak, G., & Kaczmarek, I. (2026). Exploring the Visibility Gap Between Public Investment and Media Discourse in the Wrocław Participatory Budget. Applied Sciences, 16(5), 2265. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16052265

