Next Article in Journal
Enhancement of Antibacterial and Cytocompatibility Characteristics of Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Titanium Surfaces Fabricated by Femtosecond Laser Processing
Next Article in Special Issue
Vibration-Based Fault Identification in Compaction Equipment Using Feature Extraction Techniques
Previous Article in Journal
A Multimodal Framework for Prognostic Modelling of Mental Health Treatment and Recovery Trajectories
Previous Article in Special Issue
Research on Vibration Measurement and Analysis Technology of Circuit Breaker Based on VMD and LSTM
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Optimal Shape Design of Cantilever Structure Thickness for Vibration Strain Distribution Maximization

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kaunas University of Technology, Studentų St. 56-344, LT-51424 Kaunas, Lithuania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2026, 16(2), 765; https://doi.org/10.3390/app16020765
Submission received: 15 December 2025 / Revised: 7 January 2026 / Accepted: 9 January 2026 / Published: 12 January 2026

Abstract

Energy harvesting systems face performance limitations, and existing optimizations are not always sufficient; this study addresses these gaps by enhancing piezoelectric energy systems. To improve the performance of piezoelectric energy harvesting systems, an optimization methodology is developed in this study. Since the mechanical strain distribution directly affects energy conversion efficiency, this issue is addressed through optimization of the thickness geometry of a common cantilever-type harvester elastic substrate element via a state-space gradient projection method combined with design sensitivity analysis. The gradient projection method is implemented in MATLAB R2024b software to determine the optimal elastic substrate design, after which the optimized design is simulated in COMSOL 6.3 Multiphysics for strain analysis in a transient study. The optimized cantilever designs are produced by 3D printing using a photopolymer and experimentally validated using piezo sensors and laser measurements for dynamic analysis. Theoretically compared with traditional uniform beams, the optimized cantilever designs maximize strain along the upper layer of the elastic substrate element, leading to a substantial increase in the energy conversion efficiency. This maximization is validated by experimental measurements showing a significant increase in strain in the elastic substrate (approximately 30% at the first eigenfrequency and 70% at the second). The correlation between the experimentally obtained data and the simulation results validates the optimization results. Deviation between the results did not exceed 3% and indicates that cantilever-type energy harvesters with optimized thickness profiles outperform traditional rectangular beams in energy conversion efficiency.
Keywords: shape optimization; gradient projection method; sensitivity analysis; finite element method; vibration energy harvesting; piezoelectric energy harvesting shape optimization; gradient projection method; sensitivity analysis; finite element method; vibration energy harvesting; piezoelectric energy harvesting

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Skėrys, P.; Gaidys, R. Optimal Shape Design of Cantilever Structure Thickness for Vibration Strain Distribution Maximization. Appl. Sci. 2026, 16, 765. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16020765

AMA Style

Skėrys P, Gaidys R. Optimal Shape Design of Cantilever Structure Thickness for Vibration Strain Distribution Maximization. Applied Sciences. 2026; 16(2):765. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16020765

Chicago/Turabian Style

Skėrys, Paulius, and Rimvydas Gaidys. 2026. "Optimal Shape Design of Cantilever Structure Thickness for Vibration Strain Distribution Maximization" Applied Sciences 16, no. 2: 765. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16020765

APA Style

Skėrys, P., & Gaidys, R. (2026). Optimal Shape Design of Cantilever Structure Thickness for Vibration Strain Distribution Maximization. Applied Sciences, 16(2), 765. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16020765

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop