Next Article in Journal
Mechanical Degradation and Acoustic Emission Characteristics of Sandstone Containing Intersecting Fissures Under Uniaxial Compression
Previous Article in Journal
The Optical Design and Calibration of a Finite-Conjugate VNIR Pushbroom Hyperspectral Camera for Close-Range Cultural Heritage Imaging
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Novel Rate of Penetration Prediction Model Integrating Log-Derived Geomechanical Properties and Physically Motivated Energy Parameters for Heterogeneous Formations
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

A Comparative Evaluation of Active Cooling and Passive Insulation Technologies for Thaw Mitigation During Permafrost Drilling

1
State Key Laboratory of Deep Earth Exploration and Imaging, School of Engineering and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
2
Key Laboratory of Polar Geology and Marine Mineral Resources, Ministry of Education, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
3
School of Ocean Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
4
College of Construction Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2026, 16(17), 8504; https://doi.org/10.3390/app16178504
Submission received: 19 July 2026 / Revised: 20 August 2026 / Accepted: 24 August 2026 / Published: 26 August 2026

Abstract

Permafrost thawing induced by heat transfer from circulating drilling fluid poses a significant threat to wellbore integrity and drilling safety in Arctic hydrocarbon exploration. The absence of clear application boundaries for the two primary mitigation strategies, passive insulation and active cooling, impedes the cost-effective selection of engineering measures. This study presents a comparative numerical evaluation of insulated-casing technology and refrigerant-fluid circulation technology using a coupled hydrothermal heat transfer model solved via the finite difference method. Passive insulation reduces thawed volume by increasing radial thermal resistance, with performance improving sharply as apparent thermal conductivity declines below 0.02 W/(m·K). At an optimal conductivity of 0.006 W/(m·K), insulated casing achieves a thawed volume of 2.3 m3 after 7 days, comparable to aggressive active cooling at −15 °C and 20 L/s, demonstrating its viability as an energy-free alternative. Active cooling offers superior operational controllability, yet its effectiveness hinges critically on inlet temperature; lowering this temperature exerts a dominant influence on thaw suppression, whereas increasing flow rate yields diminishing returns beyond 12.5 to 15.0 L/s. A critical caveat is that operating at 0 °C and 5 L/s paradoxically reverses the cooling effect and exacerbates thawing. Sensitivity analyses reveal that refrigerant-fluid circulation technology excels in permafrost layers up to 500 m, reducing thaw volume by a factor of two to three compared with high-performance insulation. This advantage diminishes for thicknesses exceeding 600 m, where insulated casing provides robust, thickness-independent protection. These findings establish a quantitative framework for context-specific technology selection, enabling engineers to balance thermal performance, operational controllability, and energy efficiency in permafrost drilling operations.
Keywords: permafrost drilling; thaw mitigation; insulated casing; refrigerant-fluid circulation; hydrothermal modelling; comparative evaluation permafrost drilling; thaw mitigation; insulated casing; refrigerant-fluid circulation; hydrothermal modelling; comparative evaluation

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Z.; Wang, H.; Xu, S.; Xu, L.; Zeng, R.; Sun, S.; Li, B. A Comparative Evaluation of Active Cooling and Passive Insulation Technologies for Thaw Mitigation During Permafrost Drilling. Appl. Sci. 2026, 16, 8504. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16178504

AMA Style

Wang Z, Wang H, Xu S, Xu L, Zeng R, Sun S, Li B. A Comparative Evaluation of Active Cooling and Passive Insulation Technologies for Thaw Mitigation During Permafrost Drilling. Applied Sciences. 2026; 16(17):8504. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16178504

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Zhihong, Han Wang, Shaotao Xu, Liang Xu, Ruixue Zeng, Siyuan Sun, and Bing Li. 2026. "A Comparative Evaluation of Active Cooling and Passive Insulation Technologies for Thaw Mitigation During Permafrost Drilling" Applied Sciences 16, no. 17: 8504. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16178504

APA Style

Wang, Z., Wang, H., Xu, S., Xu, L., Zeng, R., Sun, S., & Li, B. (2026). A Comparative Evaluation of Active Cooling and Passive Insulation Technologies for Thaw Mitigation During Permafrost Drilling. Applied Sciences, 16(17), 8504. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16178504

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop