Multi-Objective Taguchi-FEM Optimization and Prototype-Based Verification of a Permanent Magnet Mechanical Clutch
Featured Application
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Theoretical Derivation of the Minimum Energy Position of Magnetic Force
2.2. Three-Dimensional Magnetostatic Finite Element Analysis
2.2.1. Geometric Modeling and Simulation Domain Setup
2.2.2. Material Properties
2.2.3. Parameterization and Multi-Objective Optimetrics Analysis
2.3. Multi-Objective Optimization Procedure
- The design target for magnetic resistance in the Y-direction is set to Smaller-the-Better. This ensures the magnetic sphere can overcome resistance smoothly during the driving process to achieve displacement, preventing stalling due to excessive resistance that could disrupt the normal operation of the clutch mechanism.
- The magnetic attraction force in the Z-direction is set to “Larger-the-Better.” A higher magnetic attraction force increases the contact normal force, thereby enhancing friction. This promotes a pure rolling state for the magnetic bead, reduces sliding wear, and contributes to extending the clutch’s service life.
Steps for Multi-Objective Optimization
3. Results
3.1. Minimum Energy Position of Magnetic Force
3.2. Results of the Multi-Objective Optimization
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
- A composite objective function (OBJ) was constructed to integrate the Y-direction magnetic resistance and Z-direction magnetic attraction force, providing a systematic means to assess the trade-off behavior between disengagement tendencies and the positional retention of the magnetic beads at different positions.
- Within the evaluated parameter ranges, statistical analysis indicated that the axial distance (factor D) was the dominant design factor influencing the target responses, followed by the outer radius (factor B) and inner radius (factor A), which aligned with the trends observed in the simulated magnetic flux distribution.
- The identified parameter configuration (A = 8, B = 10.5, C = 0.5, D = 1.5) yielded a higher composite objective value than the discrete trials within the initial orthogonal array, demonstrating the utility of the regression model as a localized screening tool within the tested space.
- The prototype-based functional testing confirms that the proposed optimization strategy effectively improves engagement stability and disengagement reliability.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A. Sensitivity Analysis of Multi-Objective Aggregation Methods
| EXP | Multiplication Rank | Weighted Sum (0.5/0.5) Rank | Weighted Sum (0.7/0.3) Rank | Geometric Mean Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | 1 | 7 | 4 |
| 2 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 1 |
| 3 | 6 | 9 | 3 | 6 |
| 4 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 5 |
| 5 | 8 | 3 | 9 | 8 |
| 6 | 3 | 8 | 6 | 3 |
| 7 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 2 |
| 8 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 8 |
| 9 | 7 | 2 | 8 | 7 |
References
- Wang, Q.; Gao, F.; Zhang, J.; Li, Y. Analysis and reduction of detent effect in magnetic lead screws with parallel magnetized permanent magnet segments. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 84177–84187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belguerras, L.; Hadjout, L.; Mezani, S.; Lubin, T.; Rezzoug, A. Study of HTS magnetic coupler using analytical and numerical computations. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 2014, 24, 3600912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Hou, X. Small Clutch, and Motor and Electric Curtain Using Same. Chinese Patent No. CN101871493A, 27 October 2010. Available online: https://patents.google.com/patent/CN101871493A/zh?oq=CN101871493A (accessed on 19 May 2026).
- Cai, W.; Gu, C.; Hu, X. Analysis and design of a permanent magnet bi-stable electro-magnetic clutch unit for in-wheel electric vehicle drives. Energies 2015, 8, 5598–5612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andriushchenko, E.; Kaska, J.; Kallaste, A.; Belahcen, A.; Vaimann, T.; Rassõlkin, A. Design optimization of permanent magnet clutch with Ārtap framework. Period. Polytech. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci. 2021, 65, 106–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diao, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Li, C.; Liu, X.; Liu, Z. Dynamic characteristics of an automotive air-conditioning electromagnetic clutch. Processes 2023, 12, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kob, M.S.C.; Supriyo, B.; Tawi, K.B.; Mazali, I. Engagement slip controller development based on actuator displacement for an electro-mechanical friction clutch system. Int. J. Automot. Mech. Eng. 2015, 11, 2664–2674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Molina, L.C.; Galluzzi, R.; Hegde, S.; Bonfitto, A.; Amati, N.; Tonoli, A.; Ventura, W. Active electromagnetic clutch for crankshaft decoupling from a belt drive system. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 4770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rizzo, R.; Musolino, A.; Bucchi, F.; Forte, P.; Frendo, F. A multi-gap magnetorheological clutch with permanent magnet. Smart Mater. Struct. 2015, 24, 075012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simonelli, C.; Sani, L.; Gori, N.; Fernández-Muñoz, M.; Musolino, A.; Rizzo, R. Experimental validation of a permanent magnets magnetorheological device under a standardized worldwide harmonized light-duty test cycle. Actuators 2023, 12, 375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, Z.; Zheng, Z.; Yang, S.; Zhao, X.; Yu, X.; Han, D. Design and optimization of a pneumatic micro valve with symmetric magnetic yoke and permanent magnet assistance. Actuators 2025, 14, 388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pisetskiy, S.; Kermani, M. High-performance magneto-rheological clutches for direct-drive actuation: Design and development. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 2021, 32, 2582–2600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chowdhary, A.; Kumar, A.; Singh, K.S. Design and analysis of an electro-magnetic clutch. Int. J. Progress. Res. Sci. Eng. 2020, 1, 89–95. Available online: https://journal.ijprse.com/index.php/ijprse/article/view/57 (accessed on 19 May 2026).
- Wu, J.; Liu, Y.; Xie, H. Experimental measurement of a multi-pole magnetorheological fluid clutch under air cooling. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2024, 95, 035003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tucci, M.; Sani, L.; Dio, V.D. Optimization of a novel magneto-rheological device with permanent magnets. Prog. Electromagn. Res. M 2017, 62, 175–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tweedy, O.R.; Akcay, Y.; Giangrande, P.; Galea, M. Concept and demonstration of a coaxial magnetic coupling with electromagnetic disconnection for aircraft permanent magnet generators. IEEE Trans. Transp. Electrif. 2023, 9, 4094–4103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jackel, M.; Kloepfer, J.; Matthias, M.; Seipel, B. The novel MRF-ball-clutch design—A MRF-safety-clutch for high torque applications. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2013, 412, 012051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kluszczynski, K.; Pilch, Z. A comparison study on magnetorheological multi-disc clutches in steady continuous-duty states from the viewpoint of electrical energy consumption and spatial temperature distribution. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 7895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nicholson, S. Clutch Mechanism for Manual Roller Door Operation. U.S. Patent No. 6029735A, 17 December 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Qiu, Y. Curtain Operation Controller with Built-In Clutch. Chinese Patent No. CN102755096A, 31 July 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Tsai, J. Mechanical Clutch of Motor for Opening and Closing Curtain. Chinese Patent No. CN202991928U, 10 January 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Kao, L. Built-In Clutch and Combined Motor with Same. Chinese Patent No. CN103206468A, 31 July 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, J. Small-Sized Clutch, Electric Motor Having Small-Sized Clutch and Electro-Motion Curtain Having Small-Sized Clutch. Chinese Patent No. WO2011150819A1, 31 May 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Luo, Y. Clutch for Intelligent Window. Chinese Patent No. CN210799816U, 18 September 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Tang, R.; Liu, S.; Wu, X. Clutch Failure Prevention Structure and Method for Clutch. Chinese Patent No. CN112983999A, 13 April 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Andriushchenko, E.; Kallaste, A.; Belahcen, A.; Vaimann, T.; Rassõlkin, A.; Heidari, H.; Tiismus, H. Optimization of a 3D-printed permanent magnet coupling using genetic algorithm and taguchi method. Electronics 2021, 10, 494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mrak, B.; Lenaerts, B.; Driesen, W.; Desmet, W. Optimal design of magnetic springs: Enabling high life cycle elastic actuators. In Proceedings of the 15th International Symposium on Magnetic Bearings (ISMB16), Kitakyushu, Japan, 3–6 August 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Luo, W.; Li, Y.; Jiang, H.; Zheng, Y.; Cheng, X.; Liu, W. An optimal design approach for permanent magnet coupling using multiple shallow neural networks. SSRN 2025. Available online: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5555074 (accessed on 19 May 2026).
- Ravaud, R.; Lemarquand, V.; Lemarquand, G. Analytical design of permanent magnet radial couplings. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2010, 46, 3860–3865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roters, H.C. Calculation of the permeance of flux paths through air between surfaces of high-permeability material. In Electromagnetic Devices, 1st ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1941; pp. 116–121. [Google Scholar]








| Object | Material | Dimension (mm) | Mesh (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Magnetic bead | Built-in NdFe35 | ϕ4.8~5.2 | 1 |
| Iron washer | Built-in Steel_1008 | IR: ϕ8~9, OR: 10.5~11.5, t: 0.5~1.5 | 0.5 0.5 |
| Air Gap | Built-in Air | ϕ10 × 8 | 1 |
| Region | Built-in Vacuum | Pad all directions similarly, Percentage Offset: 100 |
| A | B | C | D | Y-Direction Magnetic Resistance at OR | Z-Direction Magnetic Force at OR | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EXP | IR rmi | OR rmo | Thickness t | Distance d | Y1 (ϕ4.8) | Y2 (ϕ5.0) | Y3 (ϕ5.2) | Z1 (ϕ4.8) | Z2 (ϕ5.0) | Z3 (ϕ5.2) |
| 1 | 8 | 10.5 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.175 | 0.188 | 0.202 | 0.599 | 0.659 | 0.717 |
| 2 | 8 | 11 | 1 | 1.5 | 0.118 | 0.136 | 0.156 | 0.384 | 0.444 | 0.51 |
| 3 | 8 | 11.5 | 1.5 | 2 | 0.075 | 0.088 | 0.104 | 0.239 | 0.278 | 0.322 |
| 4 | 8.5 | 10.5 | 1 | 2 | 0.068 | 0.08 | 0.092 | 0.238 | 0.277 | 0.32 |
| 5 | 8.5 | 11 | 1.5 | 1 | 0.202 | 0.23 | 0.261 | 0.661 | 0.752 | 0.861 |
| 6 | 8.5 | 11.5 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 0.133 | 0.129 | 0.146 | 0.375 | 0.428 | 0.483 |
| 7 | 9 | 10.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0.118 | 0.136 | 0.157 | 0.384 | 0.444 | 0.51 |
| 8 | 9 | 11 | 0.5 | 2 | 0.061 | 0.065 | 0.073 | 0.218 | 0.244 | 0.27 |
| 9 | 9 | 11.5 | 1 | 1 | 0.198 | 0.226 | 0.256 | 0.658 | 0.748 | 0.843 |
| Y-Direction Magnetic Resistance (Smaller-the-Better) | Z-Direction Magnetic Force (Larger-the-Better) | OBJ | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EXP | Y_AVG | Y_S | Y_SNR | Yn | Z_AVG | Z_S | Z_SNR | Zn | YnxZn |
| 1 | 0.1883 | 0.0110 | 14.4866 | 0.1663 | 0.6583 | 0.0482 | −3.7014 | 0.8832 | 0.1469 |
| 2 | 0.1367 | 0.0155 | 17.2311 | 0.4190 | 0.4460 | 0.0515 | −7.1875 | 0.5273 | 0.2209 |
| 3 | 0.0890 | 0.0119 | 20.9358 | 0.7601 | 0.2797 | 0.0339 | 11.2592 | 0.1115 | 0.0848 |
| 4 | 0.0800 | 0.0098 | 21.8735 | 0.8465 | 0.2783 | 0.0335 | 11.2983 | 0.1075 | 0.0910 |
| 5 | 0.2310 | 0.0241 | 12.6808 | 0.0000 | 0.7580 | 0.0818 | −2.5576 | 1.0000 | 0.0000 |
| 6 | 0.1360 | 0.0073 | 17.3169 | 0.4269 | 0.4287 | 0.0441 | −7.4965 | 0.4957 | 0.2116 |
| 7 | 0.1370 | 0.0159 | 17.2072 | 0.4168 | 0.4460 | 0.0515 | −7.1875 | 0.5273 | 0.2198 |
| 8 | 0.0663 | 0.0050 | 23.5409 | 1.0000 | 0.2440 | 0.0212 | 12.3516 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 |
| 9 | 0.2267 | 0.0237 | 12.8451 | 0.0151 | 0.7497 | 0.0755 | −2.6357 | 0.9920 | 0.0150 |
| Source | DOF | SS | MS | F | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 2 | 0.008282 | 0.004141 | 16.94 | 0.056 |
| B | 2 | 0.009519 | 0.004759 | 19.47 | 0.049 |
| D | 2 | 0.051971 | 0.025985 | 106.28 | 0.009 |
| Error | 2 | 0.000489 | 0.000245 | ||
| Total | 8 | 0.070260 |
| A | B | C | D | Y-Direction Magnetic Resistance | Z-Direction Magnetic Force | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EXP | IR rmi | OR rmo | Thickness t | Distance d | Y1 (ϕ4.8) | Y2 (ϕ5.0) | Y3 (ϕ5.2) | Z1 (ϕ4.8) | Z2 (ϕ5.0) | Z3 (ϕ5.2) |
| 2 | 8 | 11 | 1 | 1.5 | 0.118 | 0.136 | 0.156 | 0.384 | 0.444 | 0.51 |
| OPT | 8 | 10.5 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 0.109 | 0.118 | 0.131 | 0.366 | 0.404 | 0.450 |
| Y-Direction Magnetic Resistance (Smaller-the-Better) | Z-Direction Magnetic Force (Larger-the-Better) | OBJ | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EXP | Y_AVG | Y_S | Y_SNR | Yn | Z_AVG | Z_S | Z_SNR | Zn | YnxZn |
| 2 | 0.1367 | 0.0155 | 17.2311 | 0.4190 | 0.4460 | 0.0515 | −7.1875 | 0.5273 | 0.2209 |
| OPT | 0.1192 | 0.0092 | 18.4462 | 0.5309 | 0.4067 | 0.0341 | −7.9051 | 0.454 | 0.24102 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Huang, G.; Lee, C.; Huang, B. Multi-Objective Taguchi-FEM Optimization and Prototype-Based Verification of a Permanent Magnet Mechanical Clutch. Appl. Sci. 2026, 16, 5363. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16115363
Huang G, Lee C, Huang B. Multi-Objective Taguchi-FEM Optimization and Prototype-Based Verification of a Permanent Magnet Mechanical Clutch. Applied Sciences. 2026; 16(11):5363. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16115363
Chicago/Turabian StyleHuang, Guangmiao, Chengkang Lee, and Boyang Huang. 2026. "Multi-Objective Taguchi-FEM Optimization and Prototype-Based Verification of a Permanent Magnet Mechanical Clutch" Applied Sciences 16, no. 11: 5363. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16115363
APA StyleHuang, G., Lee, C., & Huang, B. (2026). Multi-Objective Taguchi-FEM Optimization and Prototype-Based Verification of a Permanent Magnet Mechanical Clutch. Applied Sciences, 16(11), 5363. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16115363

