Next Article in Journal
The Effect of the Mechanical Properties of Aluminum Alloys on Their Resistance to Cavitation Erosion
Previous Article in Journal
How Teams Score May Matter More than How Often: Play-Type Efficiency, Usage, and Success in the NBA
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Integrated Bi-Objective Scheduling of an Assembly Job Shop with Synchronous Assembly, Blocking, and Restricted Material Handling Resources

1
Shenyang Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 114 Nantajie, Shenyang 110016, China
2
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 19 Yuquanlu, Beijing 100049, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2026, 16(11), 5343; https://doi.org/10.3390/app16115343
Submission received: 23 March 2026 / Revised: 31 March 2026 / Accepted: 3 April 2026 / Published: 26 May 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Applied Industrial Technologies)

Abstract

This paper addresses an integrated production–transportation scheduling problem in assembly workshops, encompassing the processes of part machining, material handling via handling resources, and final synchronous assembly. The finite buffer capacities of production resources can cause blocking, thereby reducing efficiency. Material handling resources are subject to different service area restrictions, and some share safety zones with production resources, preventing simultaneous processing. To address this, a mixed-integer programming model is formulated with makespan and total empty travel time as bi-objective optimization targets. Since the mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) model faces difficulties in solving medium- and large-scale instances, an improved memetic NSGA-II algorithm (IMNSGA-II) is proposed. The algorithm adopts a three-segment chromosome encoding and incorporates a VNS-SA local search mechanism within the global evolutionary framework of NSGA-II. Small-scale computational experiments using Gurobi are first used to verify the correctness of the model. Decoupling experiments further demonstrate the necessity of integrated optimization: compared with phased baseline methods, IMNSGA-II reduces makespan and empty travel time by approximately 10.16% and 12.33%, respectively. In ablation and comparative experiments, results based on hypervolume (HV) and inverted generational distance (IGD) show that the proposed method achieves better convergence, diversity, and overall Pareto front quality than multiple baseline algorithms. These experiments confirm the effectiveness of the proposed model and algorithm.
Keywords: integrated scheduling; assembly job shop; blocking buffer; AGV; multi-objective optimization; memetic algorithm integrated scheduling; assembly job shop; blocking buffer; AGV; multi-objective optimization; memetic algorithm

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, Z.; Zhang, H.; Xu, Z.; Ge, S. Integrated Bi-Objective Scheduling of an Assembly Job Shop with Synchronous Assembly, Blocking, and Restricted Material Handling Resources. Appl. Sci. 2026, 16, 5343. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16115343

AMA Style

Yang Z, Zhang H, Xu Z, Ge S. Integrated Bi-Objective Scheduling of an Assembly Job Shop with Synchronous Assembly, Blocking, and Restricted Material Handling Resources. Applied Sciences. 2026; 16(11):5343. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16115343

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Zhiqi, Hao Zhang, Zhigang Xu, and Shihong Ge. 2026. "Integrated Bi-Objective Scheduling of an Assembly Job Shop with Synchronous Assembly, Blocking, and Restricted Material Handling Resources" Applied Sciences 16, no. 11: 5343. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16115343

APA Style

Yang, Z., Zhang, H., Xu, Z., & Ge, S. (2026). Integrated Bi-Objective Scheduling of an Assembly Job Shop with Synchronous Assembly, Blocking, and Restricted Material Handling Resources. Applied Sciences, 16(11), 5343. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16115343

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop