Next Article in Journal
The Role of Climbing Exercises in Developing Balance Ability in Children
Previous Article in Journal
Immersive Virtual Reality-Based Exercise for Pain Management in Fibromyalgia: An Exploratory Study with Risk of Poor Outcomes Stratification
Previous Article in Special Issue
Low-Frequency Square Kilometer Array Pattern Optimization via Convex Programming
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Dual-Tuned Magnetic Metasurface for Field Enhancement in 1H and 23Na 1.5 T MRI

by
Sabrina Rotundo
1,
Valeria Lazzoni
1,
Alessandro Dellabate
1,2,
Danilo Brizi
1,2,* and
Agostino Monorchio
1,2
1
Department of Information Engineering, University of Pisa, 56122 Pisa, Italy
2
Consorzio Nazionale Interuniversitario per le Telecomunicazioni (C.N.I.T.), 56124 Pisa, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(11), 5958; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15115958
Submission received: 19 April 2025 / Revised: 22 May 2025 / Accepted: 22 May 2025 / Published: 26 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antennas for Next-Generation Electromagnetic Applications)

Abstract

:
In this paper, we present a novel passive dual-tuned magnetic metasurface, which can enhance the field distribution produced by a closely placed radio-frequency coil for both 1H and 23Na 1.5 T MRI imaging. In particular, the proposed solution comprises a 5 × 5 capacitively loaded array, in which each unit-cell is composed of two concentric spiral coils. Specifically, the unit-cell internal spiral coil operates at the proton Larmor frequency (64 MHz), whereas the external is at the sodium one (17 MHz). Therefore, the paper aims to demonstrate the possibility of enhancing the magnetic field distribution in transmission and reception for 1.5 T MRI scanners by using the same metasurface configuration for imaging both nuclei, thus drastically simplifying the required instrumentation. We first describe the theoretical model used to design and synthetize the dual-tuned magnetic metasurface. Next, full-wave simulations are carried out to validate the approach. Finally, we report the experimental results acquired by testing the fabricated prototype at the workbench, observing a good agreement with the theoretical design and the numerical simulations. In particular, the metasurface increases the transmission efficiency Tx in presence of a biological phantom by a factor 3.5 at 17 MHz and by a factor 5 at 64 MHz, respectively. The proposed solution can pave the way for MRI multi-nuclei diagnostic technique with better images quality, simultaneously reducing the scanning time, the invasiveness on the patient and the overall costs.

1. Introduction

Magnetic resonance imaging is one of the most widespread diagnostic techniques in the biomedical and clinical fields [1,2]. Indeed, compared to PET and X-rays, it exploits the interactions between tissues and a radio-frequency magnetic field. Therefore, due to the absence of ionizing radiation, it is safer for the patients [3]. In addition, differently from other imaging modalities, it does not require solving an inverse problem to infer tissues properties [4]. Hence, the use of direct algorithms makes this technology a reliable and convenient means for diagnostics.
Naturally, double-tuned MRI modalities have also been developed, which are able to combine signals coming from multiple chemical nuclei. In this way, anatomical and functional information can be simultaneously acquired, thus enhancing the imaging capabilities [5,6,7,8]. As an example, many human diseases involve alterations in the regulation of 23Na concentration, although detecting the weak signal emitted by the sodium is, to date, still a challenge. Although these are promising advantages, the scientific community is nevertheless focused on continuously improving MRI performance, particularly in terms of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), transmission efficiency (TXE), and RF magnetic field spatial homogeneity.
As can be expected, optimizing transmission efficiency while preserving magnetic field homogeneity and enhancing signal-to-noise ratio is extremely challenging. Moreover, these performance parameters must also be considered together with the Specific Absorption Rate minimization, necessarily resulting in a trade-off [9,10,11,12,13,14]. Therefore, researchers are partaking in a great effort to improve MRI performance, and consequently, the image quality. In particular, although the imaging post-processing elaboration plays a very important role in the enhancement of imaging, we will focus on hardware aspects in this work.
In this sense, to improve the transmission efficiency and the detection of smaller signals emitted by the investigated tissue, a solution based on high-permittivity dielectric pads included within the scanner during the procedure has been presented in the literature [15,16,17]. In particular, this technology has been successfully declined for brain scanning, by using a high permittivity material helmet (HPM-helmet) that covered the patient’s head [18,19,20]. According to the Maxwell equations, the magnetic field is enhanced by placing a dielectric material which is able to increase the displacement currents. Although a transmission efficiency improvement up to 65% inside the tissue was observed, this solution is nevertheless extremely cumbersome and heavy, producing discomfort for the patient and difficulties to be integrated within the scanner.
As an alternative to enhancing the SNR, several high sensitivity receiving coils designs, characterized by shapes conformal to the anatomy of the specific investigated tissue, have also been described in the literature [21,22,23]. This approach can be extremely effective but is usually limited to surface coils with a single operating frequency.
Recently, the use of electromagnetic metasurfaces has also been proposed in MRI. Typically, metasurfaces consist of a 2D periodic arrangement of properly designed resonant elements able to show non-natural electromagnetic properties, such as negative permeability or permittivity and also negative refractive index [24,25]. Due to their compact dimensions with respect to their 3D counterpart, metasurfaces have recently received a lot of attention in several fields, as well in biomedical applications [26,27,28]. In their first application in MRI, the replacement of the heavy and cumbersome dielectric pads has occurred by implementing dielectric metasurfaces [29]. The physical idea is that the conductance currents flowing along a periodic array of thin metal strips can create a magnetic field similar to the one produced by the displacement currents inside a high-permittivity material. Besides dielectric metasurfaces, magnetic metasurfaces have also been created for enhancing the RF magnetic field [30]. In this case, the aim is to increase the equivalent magnetic permeability [31]. In both the dielectric and magnetic versions, metasurfaces have been proved to be an effective medium to improve the magnetic field distribution and thus, to guarantee significant image quality improvement [10,11,32]. However, to date, a severe limitation of metasurfaces employed in MRI relies on the operating frequency. Indeed, only single frequency metasurfaces have been developed by preventing this promising technology from being extended for multi-nuclei MRI systems.
Therefore, to overcome the actual literature limits and, for the first time to the best of the authors’ knowledge, this paper presents an innovative dual-tuned metasurface able to guarantee dual-nuclei imaging and to enhance the magnetic field distribution for 1.5 T MRI scanners. In particular, the work aims to explore the possibility to improve both the transmission efficiency and the signal-to-noise ratio for 1H and 23Na MRI imaging with a single metasurface, which is able to simultaneously perform at both related Larmor frequencies. This can be translated into the reduction in scanning time, instrumentation complexity, and overall system costs.
From a design perspective, the proposed metasurface comprises a 5 × 5 passive array, in which each unit-cell is properly loaded with a capacitor to control the flowing current by resorting to an opportune analytical model [32,33]. To achieve a double-frequency operation, each unit-cell consists of two concentric spiral coils; the internal one resonates at the proton Larmor frequency (64 MHz), whereas the external one is at the sodium Larmor frequency (17 MHz). By interposing the passive metasurface between a standard MRI RF loop and the biological tissue, the overall transmission efficiency T x and signal-to-noise ratio improvements are evaluated at both the operating frequencies. In particular, theoretical and numerical results are supported by workbench measurements acquired on fabricated PCB prototypes.
The remainder of the paper is organized as follows. Section 2 describes the imaging system design and the analytical model behind the proposed solution. Further, the numerical and experimental test-cases are also reported in Section 2, while Section 3 is devoted to presenting the numerical and experimental results. Finally, conclusions and future developments are discussed.

2. Materials and Methods

A flow chart of the proposed methodology is summarized in Figure 1. It starts with a theoretical model applied on the numerical design, finally accomplishing the prototyping process. In the next sections, a detailed explanation of the various steps is reported.

2.1. Theoretical Model

As previously introduced, magnetic metasurfaces are specially engineered structures capable of exhibiting unconventional properties, such as enhanced or even negative magnetic permeability. Typically, they consist of arrays of resonant unit cells, whose dimensions are determined by the operating frequency and critically influence the resulting magnetic field distribution. When appropriately designed, the entire metastructure exhibits resonant behavior, allowing the effective magnetic permeability to be tailored over specific frequency bands and enabling the enhancement of the magnetic field strength, in accordance with Maxwell’s second equation.
× B = μ 0 μ r J + i ω Ɛ o E ,
where B ( T ) and E ( V / m ) are, respectively, the magnetic induction and the electric fields; μ 0 ( H / m ) and Ɛ o ( F / m ) are, instead, the vacuum magnetic permeability and dielectric permittivity; μ r is the relative magnetic permeability; ω = 2 π f , where f is the operative frequency. Finally, J ( A / m 2 ) is defined as the current density. Therefore, according to (1), it is possible to enhance the magnetic field strength by increasing both the conductance and the displacement currents, acting on the engineered relative magnetic permeability realized by the metasurface.
One of the most important MRI RF coil parameters, fundamental for imaging quality, is the homogeneity of the generated magnetic field. It is important to note that electromagnetic metasurfaces are typically designed under the assumption of infinite extent, which inherently ensures a homogeneous response. In such cases, each unit cell shares identical boundary conditions—being surrounded by an infinite array of neighbors—and consequently carries the same current distribution. However, at relatively low operating frequencies, such as those used in MRI, the physical size of each unit cell becomes large enough that only a limited number can be used to construct the metasurface. Under these conditions, where the metasurface is finite, edge or truncation effects can become significant, potentially degrading the performance in terms of magnetic field homogeneity. It is easy to understand that only the central unit-cells are surrounded by a large number of elements, while, on the external borders, an asymmetry can be spotted. For this reason, to restore the ideal metasurface behavior, an analytic algorithm is employed to control each unit-cell current [32], and thus, the overall magnetic field distribution. Specifically, by accounting for both the self-impedance of each unit cell and the mutual coupling between them, it becomes possible to compensate for the truncation effects associated with the finite size of the metasurface. If the active RF coil used to excite the metasurface is denoted as element 1, and the metasurface unit cells are indexed from 2 to N, the overall system can be described using an impedance matrix as follows:
Z 11 Z 12 Z 13 Z 1 N Z 21 Z 22 Z 23 Z 2 N Z 31 Z 32 Z 33 Z 3 N Z N 1 Z N 2 Z N 3 Z N N I 1 c 2 I x c 3 I x c N I x = V 1 0 0 0 ,
where the current flowing in the i-th cell can be written as follows:
I i = c i I x               w i t h   i = 2,3 , , N ,
in which c i is the i-th complex current coefficient and I x is an arbitrary reference value.
By enforcing resonance conditions for each element of the array at the target operating frequency, the required reactance for each unit cell can be determined to achieve the desired response of the metasurface:
Z i i = j = 2 , j i N c j Z i j c i               w i t h   i = 2,3 N ,
Although arbitrary current distributions can be synthesized, we set all coefficients equal to 1 in order to mitigate truncation effects and ensure a homogeneous magnetic field distribution. Specifically, the algorithm calculates the values of the capacitors that must be connected in series with each unit cell to achieve the desired current control.
As described in the introduction, the proposed metasurface is conceived to operate at two different frequencies, at the same time. Therefore, the metasurface unit-cell design is slightly more complicated, relying on two concentric spiral coils resonating at the two desired frequencies. Specific attention must be paid to the mutual coupling between these two concentric spirals, that must be minimized to avoid crosstalk between them.
Finally, the transmission efficiency T x and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) are adopted as metrics to assess the accomplished performance, both in presence and in absence of the metasurface. In particular, as reported in the literature, the transmission efficiency can be evaluated as follows:
η = B 1 + P ,
where B 1 + ( T ) is the magnetic field component which rotates in the same direction as the nuclear precession and P ( W ) is the power provided by the generator.
Instead, the SNR of the image can be expressed as follows [34]:
S N R   ~ sin θ · B 1 P ,
where θ is the excitation flip angle; B 1 is the receive field and P ( W ) is the coil accepted power.
In the following section, we present the numerical and experimental set-up, conceived to prove the effectiveness of our approach.

2.2. Numerical Design Procedure

In order to validate and demonstrate the described approach, we realized a numerical set-up, by employing an electromagnetic full wave solver based on the Method of Moments (Feko Suite, Altair, USA). The overall set-up comprises an active RF loop, the dual-tuned magnetic metasurface and a biological phantom (Figure 2).
In detail, the proposed metasurface consists of a passive 5 × 5 array, covering a 15 cm × 15 cm area, in which each unit-cell is composed of two concentric resonant spiral coils. Specifically, the 5-turn internal spiral is made resonant at 64 MHz, whereas the 4-turn external one is at 17 MHz, taking into particular consideration their mutual coupling. The inner spiral presents an external diameter of 17 mm, with a spiral pitch of 0.9 mm; the outer one, instead, has a 29.2 mm external diameter with the same pitch. The passive metasurface is inductively excited by a circular RF loop, presenting a 20 cm diameter and placed 5 mm far from the array. Both the metasurface and the RF loop are fabricated with a 28 AWG single strand lossy copper wire. The corresponding CAD model, including a biological phantom and the transversal plane where the B 1 + field is evaluated in the following sections, is depicted in Figure 2. Conversely, all the system geometrical properties are summarized in Table 1.
As is well known, the mutual coupling term in the inductive regime between two coils is directly proportional to their self-inductances, while being inversely proportional to the relative distance. By considering this phenomenon, we paid special attention to the metasurface unit-cells design and positioning. In particular, a design optimization process was followed to minimize the mutual coupling coefficient between the two spirals constituting the single unit-cell. The different operating frequencies (17 and 64 MHz) are in part helpful in limiting the coupling, but a proper spatial distance between these two elements must also be accomplished. By carefully optimizing the geometry and the periodicity of the unit-cells, an acceptable trade-off can be found.
After taking care of the geometry, we then proceeded by applying the analytical algorithm described in the previous section to compensate for the truncation effects. Thus, we loaded each coil with the appropriate capacitor, homogenizing the current flowing in each unit-cell and, consequently, the produced magnetic field. In addition, in order to maximize the power transmitted to the metasurface, we designed two different matching networks for the active RF loop, at 17 MHz and 64 MHz, whose topologies are described in Figure 3. The corresponding lumped elements values are reported in Table 2.
Finally, we also introduced the presence of a biological phantom to realize a realistic scenario, simulated with a cylinder with an ellipsoidal base presenting a major axis equal to 100 mm and a minor axis equal to 50 mm (Figure 2). The total phantom height is 200 mm, while the corresponding dielectric properties are set to simulate muscle tissues, and they are estimated from [35].
To demonstrate the validity of the method, we performed two full-wave simulations for each frequency (17 and 64 MHz) with and without the presence of the metasurface between the RF loop and the investigated tissue, carefully evaluating the obtained magnetic field distributions.

2.3. Fabricated Prototype

To experimentally support the numerical approach, we also fabricated a prototype (Figure 4). In particular, both the metasurface and the RF loop were realized by using PCB technology. The metasurface was etched over the top layer of a 0.1 mm thick FR4 substrate ( Ɛ r = 4.3 and tanδ = 0.025), whereas, on the other side the evaluated capacitors were soldered according to the numerical design process. Since we used AWG single strand copper wires in the numerical design to computationally speed up the simulations, we designed the PCB printed coils according to the following relation [36] to guarantee the inductance equivalence.
w = 4.482 a ,
where w is the printed strip width and a is the wire radius.
Because the metasurface can be used to enhance the magnetic field both in transmission and reception, special attention must be paid to the capacitor’s choice. Indeed, especially in transmission, relatively high power levels must be handled, therefore, appropriate ceramic capacitors have been consequently selected [37]. On the other hand, the RF active loop was etched on the top layer of a 0.8 mm thick FR4 substrate. Also in this case, we soldered on the bottom layer the components of the matching networks at the two frequencies (Figure 4). Finally, we equipped the RF loop with a 50-Ω-micro-SMA connector to enable measurements with a vector network analyzer (Fieldfox series VNA N9918A, Keysight, Santa Rosa, CA, USA). Lastly, we realized a muscle phantom (Figure 5) by using a cylindrical plastic container (200 mm height with a circular base presenting a 100 mm diameter), filled with a mixture of water, glycine ( C 2 H 5 N O 2 ) at 12% w/v, and NaCl at 0.53% w/v, following the methodologies described in [35,38]. It is important to note that the relative positioning among RF coil, metasurface, and phantom must respect the distance values optimized during the design process to guarantee the maximum performance of the overall system.

3. Numerical and Experimental Results

As a first step, we numerically evaluated the mutual coupling between the two concentric spirals constituting the single unit-cell. Indeed, in order to have the metasurface working simultaneously at both the desired frequencies (17 and 64 MHz), it is particularly important that the two concentric spirals of a single unit-cell are sufficiently decoupled at the respective operating frequencies. The results, shown in Figure 6, demonstrated that the two concentric spirals present a low coupling level, although larger at 64 MHz. While this value is acceptable in terms of performance, room for improvement is still available in this parameter.
We therefore proceeded with the unit-cell’s currents homogenization procedure. By following the calculations performed in the previous section, we loaded each element of the metasurface with the appropriate capacitor in order to avoid truncation effects. In Figure 7a,b, the maps of the capacitive loads at 17 MHz and 64 MHz are reported. As apparent from Figure 7b, the capacitance values at 64 MHz do not depend in essence on the unit-cell position within the metasurface. This is due to the larger periodicity for the unit-cells internal spirals, which results in a lower reciprocal mutual coupling (and, thus, less correction required for homogenization).
Once the loads are applied, the currents flowing in the unit-cells are homogenized for both the operative frequencies, as is evident in the numerical results reported in Figure 8a,b. Due to the not completely negligible mutual coupling between the single unit-cell external and internal spirals at 64 MHz, a minor deviation (not affecting in practical aspects) from perfect homogenization can be spotted at the four metasurface corners. Notably, when the metasurface is working at a specific frequency (e.g., 17 MHz), the current does not flow in the coils tuned at the other frequency (e.g., 64 MHz), as expected. Another important metric, as explained before, relies on the transmission efficiency evaluation. In Figure 9, we reported the numerical transmission efficiency increase achievable thanks to the metasurface adoption, respectively, without (Figure 9a,b) and with (Figure 9c,d) the presence of a biological phantom, at 17 MHz and 64 MHz. As is evident, in the absence of the biological phantom, the transmission efficiency increases by a factor 4.5 (at 17 MHz) and 5.5 (at 64 MHz). Instead, in the presence of the phantom, we obtain an increase in a factor 3.5 and 5 at 17 MHz and 64 MHz, respectively. Since the same RF coil and metasurface are used to receive the signal, the B 1 also increases by the same factor of the B 1 + by the principle of reciprocity [36]. Therefore, in the reasonable hypothesis that the biological load losses are dominant, the SNR percentage enhancement obtained with the metasurface is also represented by the map reported in Figure 9c,d. In addition, we also investigated the effect that capacitor’s tolerances, which are unavoidable in practical scenarios, can have on the field map produced by the metasurface. Therefore, we randomly assigned a ±1% tolerance (a typical commercial value) to the capacitances determined in Figure 7. After that, we evaluated the H-field map on a plane parallel to the metasurface and 40 mm distant from it. By comparing the map obtained with the ideal capacitor’s values of Figure 7 and the one with tolerances, we found that the maximum percentage deviation happens for the 64 MHz Larmor frequency. As can be observed from Figure 10, the maximum field deviation due to the tolerances remains under 9%, thus proving the robustness of the proposed solution.
Further, we proceed with the experimental measurement campaign employing the fabricated prototype. Figure 11 shows the simulated and measured S 11 parameters for the RF loop with the metasurface, for both 17 MHz and 64 MHz and with and without the biological phantom load. As is evident, in all cases, the reflection coefficients are less than −10 dB, proving the effectiveness of the matching networks computed in the design process. In particular, the presence of the phantom does not significantly change the reactive part of the input impedance of the system, and, consequently, the matching is preserved. Comparing the numerical and experimental results, it is possible to conclude that the effectiveness of the overall fabrication process is satisfactorily demonstrated.
Finally, the adopted fabrication technique based on PCB manufacturing ensures the required mechanical stability and electrical and thermal robustness in operative MRI scenarios, thus straightforwardly enabling a future implementation in real scanners [37].

4. Conclusions

In this paper, a novel passive dual-tuned magnetic metasurface for 1.5T MRI 1H and 23Na imaging has been proposed. In particular, the dual-tuned metasurface is able to enhance the magnetic field strength both in transmission and receiving phases and for both the required Larmor frequencies simultaneously. The final metasurface design consists of a 5 × 5 passive capacitively loaded array, in which each unit-cell is composed, in turn, of two concentric spirals. The two concentric spirals are responsible for the dual-frequency metasurface response, since they are made resonant at the two Larmor frequencies, i.e., 17 and 64 MHz. Due to the metasurface finiteness and consequent truncation effects, an appropriate compensation loading procedure was carried out through an analytical model. This correction led to homogenization of the unit-cells current distribution, thus avoiding the metasurface response degradation while also enhancing the magnetic field strength.
To validate the proposed solution, we conceived a numerical test-case, comprising a RF loop and a metasurface placed 5 mm above it. Next, we performed full-wave simulations with and without the presence of the metasurface, when the radiative system is loaded with a representative biological load. The performance of the metasurface with respect to the single RF loop was evaluated in terms of transmission efficiency T x . A significant T x improvement of factor 3.5 at 17 MHz and of 5 at 64 MHz was observed in the presence of the biological phantom. Finally, we also fabricated PCB prototypes, achieving excellent agreement with the simulations in terms of S 11 parameters, proving the overall design procedure effectiveness.
To conclude, this solution can be potentially helpful in the MRI multi-nuclei diagnostic technique, allowing for better image quality by using the same hardware configuration, thus reducing the scanning time, the invasiveness on the patient and the final overall costs. Clearly, several aspects must be addressed before the solution can be adopted in actual MRI clinical imaging, as evaluating its robustness for different human districts and size scalability. Therefore, future works will be directed to apply and refine the solution in a real clinical scenario, addressing the aforementioned issues.

Author Contributions

S.R., V.L. and A.D. were the main contributors to this work and were responsible for developing and implementing the methods, conducting measurements, and analysis; D.B. was responsible for investigation, supervision and writing; D.B. and A.M. critically analyzed the results, suggested modifications and reviewed the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not appliable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not appliable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Acknowledgments

Work partially supported by the Italian Ministry of Research (MUR) in the framework of the FoReLab and CrossLab projects (Departments of Excellence).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
AWGAmerican Wire Gauge
CADComputer Aided Design
DTDual Tuned
MRIMagnetic Resonance Imaging
PCBPrinted Circuit Board
RFRadio-Frequency
SMASub-Miniature version A
SNRSignal-to-noise-Ratio
VNAVector Network Analyzer

References

  1. Sim, A.J.; Kaza, E.; Singer, L.; Rosenberg, S.A. A review of the role of MRI in diagnosis and treatment of early stage lung cancer. Clin. Transl. Radiat. Oncol. 2020, 24, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Mahlknecht, P.; Hotter, A.; Hussl, A.; Esterhammer, R.; Schocke, M.; Seppi, K. Significance of MRI in Diagnosis and Differential Diagnosis of Parkinson’s Disease. Neurodegener. Dis. 2010, 7, 300–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Dempsey, M.F.; Condon, B.; Hadley, D.M. MRI safety review. Semin. Ultrasound CT MRI 2002, 23, 392–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Pirogov, Y.A. Multinuclear MRI Research. Appl. Magn. Reson. 2021, 52, 1695–1705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Maggiorelli, F.; Buonincontri, G.; Retico, A.; Kaggie, J.D.; Graves, M.J.; Biagi, L.; Tiberi, G.; Tosetti, M. Sodium imaging of the human knee cartilage with magnetic resonance at ultra high field: Development of a double frequency (1 H/23 Na) RF coil. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Symposium, Florence, Italy, 26–30 March 2017; pp. 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ahmed, H.M.; Soliman, A.M. The Availability to Target Different Nuclei in Ultrahigh MRI Using Dual Band RF Coil. In Proceedings of the 2019 36th National Radio Science Conference (NRSC), Port Said, Egypt, 16–18 April 2019; pp. 410–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Asfour, A.; Auboiroux, V. A new dedicated double-tuned (100 MHz–27 MHz) volume RF coil actively-decoupled form a receive-only simple-tuned (27 MHz) coil: Application to the MRI experiments of hyperpolarized 129Xe in the rat brain. In Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference, Victoria, BC, Canada, 12–15 May 2008; pp. 945–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Maggiorelli, F.; Retico, A.; Boskamp, E.; Robb, F.; Galante, A.; Fantasia, M.; Alecci, M.; Tosetti, M.; Tiberi, G. Double Tuned 1 H-23 Na Birdcage Coils for MRI at 7 T: Performance evaluation through electromagnetic simulations. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA), Rome, Italy, 11–13 June 2018; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Brink, W.M.; Webb, A.G. High permittivity pads reduce specific absorption rate, improve B 1 homogeneity, and increase contrast-to-noise ratio for functional cardiac MRI at 3 T: High Permittivity Pads for Cardiac MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 2014, 71, 1632–1640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Goerner, F.L.; Clarke, G.D. Measuring signal-to-noise ratio in partially parallel imaging MRI: Signal-to-noise ratio in parallel imaging MRI. Med. Phys. 2011, 38, 5049–5057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ocali, O.; Atalar, E. Ultimate intrinsic signal-to-noise ratio in MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 1998, 39, 462–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Maunder, A.; Zanche, N.D.; Iyer, A.K. Simulation Comparison of Birdcage Coil and Metamaterial Liner for MRI at 3T and 4.7T. In Proceedings of the 2020 50th European Microwave Conference (EuMC), Utrecht, The Netherlands, 12–14 January 2021; pp. 1067–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wu, C.; Bai, Z.; Xiao, J.; Wang, J. Simulation analysis on quality factor of RF receiving coil for an MRI system. In Proceedings of the 2009 Chinese Control and Decision Conference, Guilin, China, 17–19 June 2009; pp. 4652–4655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. de Zwart, J.A.; Ledden, P.J.; Kellman, P.; van Gelderen, P.; Duyn, J.H. Design of a SENSE-optimized high-sensitivity MRI receive coil for brain imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 2002, 47, 1218–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Luo, W.; Lanagan, M.T.; Sica, C.T.; Ryu, Y.; Oh, S.; Ketterman, M.; Yang, Q.X.; Collins, C.M. Permittivity and performance of dielectric pads with sintered ceramic beads in MRI: Early experiments and simulations at 3 T. Magn. Reson. Med. 2013, 70, 269–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Brink, W.M.; van der Jagt, A.M.A.; Versluis, M.J.; Verbist, B.M.; Webb, A.G. High Permittivity Dielectric Pads Improve High Spatial Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Inner Ear at 7 T. Investig. Radiol. 2014, 49, 271–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Webb, A.G. Dielectric materials in magnetic resonance. Concepts Magn. Reson. Part A 2011, 38, 148–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lakshmanan, K.; Carluccio, G.; Walczyk, J.; Brown, R.; Rupprecht, S.; Yang, Q.X.; Lanagan, M.T.; Collins, C.M. Improved whole-brain SNR with an integrated high-permittivity material in a head array at 7T. Magn. Reson. Med. 2021, 86, 1167–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Haemer, G.G.; Carluccio, G.; Collins, C.M. Design of an 8Ch Dipole Transmit Array for Head Imaging with the use of a High Permittivity Material Helmet Shaped Former. In Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Electromagnetics in Advanced Applications (ICEAA), Cartagena des Indias, Colombia, 10–14 September 2018; pp. 601–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yu, Z.; Xin, X.; Collins, C.M. Potential for high-permittivity materials to reduce local SAR at a pacemaker lead tip during MRI of the head with a body transmit coil at 3 T: High Permittivity Materials and Pacemaker. Magn. Reson. Med. 2017, 78, 383–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ugle, N.; Bhuiya, T.K.; Dapkar, R.; Shinde, D.M.; Bagchi, S. Design and Comparison of Rectangular, Square and Hexagonal RF Coils for 1.5T MRI System. In Proceedings of the 2018 9th International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT), Bangalore, India, 10–12 July 2018; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Buehrer, M.; Pruessmann, K.P.; Boesiger, P.; Kozerke, S. Array compression for MRI with large coil arrays. Magn. Reson. Med. 2007, 57, 1131–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Li, Y.; Guo, Y.; Jiang, X. Signal-to-Noise Ratio Improvement by Bi-2223 Surface RF Coil in 0.3T MRI System. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 2010, 20, 818–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hu, J.; Bandyopadhyay, S.; Liu, Y.H.; Shao, L.Y. A Review on Metasurface: From Principle to Smart Metadevices. Front. Phys. 2021, 8, 586087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bukhari, S.S.; Vardaxoglou, J.; Whittow, W. A Metasurfaces Review: Definitions and Applications. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 2727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Brizi, D.; Monorchio, A. Magnetic metasurfaces properties in the near field regions. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 3258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Brizi, D.; Di Napoli, E.; Monorchio, A. Design of a Homogenized Magnetic Metasurface for the RF Magnetic Field Enhancement in 1.5 T MRI. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation and USNC-URSI Radio Science Meeting (APS/URSI), Singapore, 4–10 December 2021; pp. 355–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Brizi, D.; Conte, M.; Monorchio, A. A Performance-Enhanced Antenna for Microwave Biomedical Applications by Using Metasurfaces. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2023, 71, 3314–3323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Vorobyev, V.; Shchelokova, A.; Efimtcev, A.; Baena, J.D.; Abdeddaim, R.; Belov, P.; Melchakova, I.; Glybovski, S. Improving homogeneity in abdominal imaging at 3 T with light, flexible, and compact metasurface. Magn. Reson. Med. 2022, 87, 496–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Das, P.; Gupta, J.; Sikdar, D.; Bhattacharjee, R. Analysis of SNR Enhancement in 1.5T MRI by Using Metasurfaces. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE Microwaves, Antennas, and Propagation Conference (MAPCON), Bangalore, India, 12–15 December 2022; pp. 444–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhao, X.; Duan, G.; Wu, K.; Anderson, S.W.; Zhang, X. Intelligent Metamaterials Based on Nonlinearity for Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1905461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Brizi, D.; Monorchio, A. An analytical approach for the arbitrary control of magnetic metasurfaces frequency response. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2021, 20, 1003–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Falchi, M.; Rotundo, S.; Brizi, D.; Monorchio, A. Analysis and design of holographic magnetic metasurfaces in the very near field for sensing applications at quasi-static regime. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 9220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Schmidt, R.; Slobozhanyuk, A.; Belov, P.; Webb, A. Flexible and compact hybrid metasurfaces for enhanced ultra high field in vivo magnetic resonance imaging. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Gabriel, S.; Lau, R.W.; Gabriel, C. The dielectric properties of biological tissues: III. Parametric models for the dielectric spectrum of tissues. Phys. Med. Biol. 1996, 41, 2271–2293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Giovannetti, G.; Hartwig, V.; Landini, L.; Santarelli, M.F. Low-Field MR Coils: Comparison between Strip and Wire Conductors. Appl. Magn. Reson. 2010, 39, 391–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Brizi, D.; Fontana, N.; Costa, F.; Tiberi, G.; Galante, A.; Alecci, M.; Monorchio, A. Design of Distributed Spiral Resonators for the Decoupling of MRI Double-Tuned RF Coils. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2020, 67, 2806–2816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hagmann, M.J.; Levin, R.L.; Calloway, L.; Osborn, A.J.; Foster, K.R. Muscle-equivalent phantom materials for 10–100 MHz. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 1992, 40, 760–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Flow chart of the proposed methodology.
Figure 1. Flow chart of the proposed methodology.
Applsci 15 05958 g001
Figure 2. Three-dimensional CAD model of the proposed system, including the radiating elements, the biological phantom, and the transversal plane in which the magnetic field is evaluated.
Figure 2. Three-dimensional CAD model of the proposed system, including the radiating elements, the biological phantom, and the transversal plane in which the magnetic field is evaluated.
Applsci 15 05958 g002
Figure 3. Employed matching networks topologies: (a) RF loop and metasurface at 17 MHz; (b) RF loop and metasurface at 64 MHz; (c) RF loop w/o metasurface at 17 MHz and 64 MHz. In particular, the metasurface can be represented as an equivalent RLC circuit [26].
Figure 3. Employed matching networks topologies: (a) RF loop and metasurface at 17 MHz; (b) RF loop and metasurface at 64 MHz; (c) RF loop w/o metasurface at 17 MHz and 64 MHz. In particular, the metasurface can be represented as an equivalent RLC circuit [26].
Applsci 15 05958 g003
Figure 4. Experimental set-up: (a) top and bottom layer of the PCB metasurface; (b) top and bottom layer of the PCB driver; (c) measurement set-up, including RF loop, metasurface and VNA. We employed foam spacers ( Ɛ r = 1 ) to control both metasurface-RF loop distance and metasurface-phantom distance.
Figure 4. Experimental set-up: (a) top and bottom layer of the PCB metasurface; (b) top and bottom layer of the PCB driver; (c) measurement set-up, including RF loop, metasurface and VNA. We employed foam spacers ( Ɛ r = 1 ) to control both metasurface-RF loop distance and metasurface-phantom distance.
Applsci 15 05958 g004aApplsci 15 05958 g004b
Figure 5. Muscle phantom sample.
Figure 5. Muscle phantom sample.
Applsci 15 05958 g005
Figure 6. Mutual coupling between the two concentric spirals constituting a single unit-cell, respectively, tuned at 17 and 64 MHz. The level of coupling is higher at 64 MHz but still limited.
Figure 6. Mutual coupling between the two concentric spirals constituting a single unit-cell, respectively, tuned at 17 and 64 MHz. The level of coupling is higher at 64 MHz but still limited.
Applsci 15 05958 g006
Figure 7. Currents homogenization procedure: calculated capacitances (pF) maps at 17 MHz (a) and 64 MHz (b).
Figure 7. Currents homogenization procedure: calculated capacitances (pF) maps at 17 MHz (a) and 64 MHz (b).
Applsci 15 05958 g007
Figure 8. Current distribution within the metasurface elements at (a) 17 MHz and (b) 64 MHz after the homogenization analytical procedure. As is evident, at a specific operative frequency, the currents are not flowing in the spirals resonating at the other one; moreover, their amplitude results uniform within the array.
Figure 8. Current distribution within the metasurface elements at (a) 17 MHz and (b) 64 MHz after the homogenization analytical procedure. As is evident, at a specific operative frequency, the currents are not flowing in the spirals resonating at the other one; moreover, their amplitude results uniform within the array.
Applsci 15 05958 g008
Figure 9. Numerical transmission efficiency increases for the RF loop in presence of the metasurface: without biological load at 17 MHz (a) and at 64 MHz (b); with biological load at 17 MHz (c) and at 64 MHz (d).
Figure 9. Numerical transmission efficiency increases for the RF loop in presence of the metasurface: without biological load at 17 MHz (a) and at 64 MHz (b); with biological load at 17 MHz (c) and at 64 MHz (d).
Applsci 15 05958 g009aApplsci 15 05958 g009b
Figure 10. Comparison between the H-field maps obtained with ideal capacitance values and with ±1% tolerances evaluated over a plane 40 mm away from the metasurface and parallel to it at the 64 MHz Larmor frequency.
Figure 10. Comparison between the H-field maps obtained with ideal capacitance values and with ±1% tolerances evaluated over a plane 40 mm away from the metasurface and parallel to it at the 64 MHz Larmor frequency.
Applsci 15 05958 g010
Figure 11. RF loops with metasurface with and without biological phantom: comparison between simulated and measured | S 11 | parameters at the two desired frequencies, showing a general good agreement.
Figure 11. RF loops with metasurface with and without biological phantom: comparison between simulated and measured | S 11 | parameters at the two desired frequencies, showing a general good agreement.
Applsci 15 05958 g011
Table 1. System design parameters.
Table 1. System design parameters.
ParameterRF LoopUnit-Cell Inner SpiralUnit-Cell External Spiral
Outer diameter (mm)2001729.2
Inner diameter (mm)200 8 22
Number of turns15 4
Copper wire 28 AWG 28 AWG28 AWG
Spacing between windings (mm)N/A0.9 0.9
Table 2. Capacitances employed in matching networks.
Table 2. Capacitances employed in matching networks.
C1 (pF)C2 (pF)
RF loop 17 MHz1550112
RF loop 64 MHz4117
RF loop and Metasurface 17 MHz240N/A
RF loop and Metasurface 64 MHz7.659
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rotundo, S.; Lazzoni, V.; Dellabate, A.; Brizi, D.; Monorchio, A. Dual-Tuned Magnetic Metasurface for Field Enhancement in 1H and 23Na 1.5 T MRI. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 5958. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15115958

AMA Style

Rotundo S, Lazzoni V, Dellabate A, Brizi D, Monorchio A. Dual-Tuned Magnetic Metasurface for Field Enhancement in 1H and 23Na 1.5 T MRI. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(11):5958. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15115958

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rotundo, Sabrina, Valeria Lazzoni, Alessandro Dellabate, Danilo Brizi, and Agostino Monorchio. 2025. "Dual-Tuned Magnetic Metasurface for Field Enhancement in 1H and 23Na 1.5 T MRI" Applied Sciences 15, no. 11: 5958. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15115958

APA Style

Rotundo, S., Lazzoni, V., Dellabate, A., Brizi, D., & Monorchio, A. (2025). Dual-Tuned Magnetic Metasurface for Field Enhancement in 1H and 23Na 1.5 T MRI. Applied Sciences, 15(11), 5958. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15115958

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop