Next Article in Journal
GhostNeXt: Rethinking Module Configurations for Efficient Model Design
Next Article in Special Issue
CNN-Based Pill Image Recognition for Retrieval Systems
Previous Article in Journal
A New Approach to Nonlinear State Observation for Affine Control Dynamical Systems
Previous Article in Special Issue
Trust Components: An Analysis in The Development of Type 2 Diabetic Mellitus Mobile Application
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Cross-Platform Gait Analysis and Fall Detection Wearable Device

1
Department of Electrical Engineering, Lunghwa University of Science and Technology, Taoyuan 333326, Taiwan
2
Department of Electronic Engineering, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Yunlin 540301, Taiwan
3
Department of Electrical Engineering, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung 807618, Taiwan
4
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 202301, Taiwan
5
Institute of Materials Science and Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 106344, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(5), 3299; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13053299
Submission received: 10 January 2023 / Revised: 23 February 2023 / Accepted: 24 February 2023 / Published: 4 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Intelligent Medicine and Health Care)

Abstract

:
Since the fall was often occurred in elders daily, this paper focused on gait analysis with fall detection to develop a wearable device. To ensure that the mobile application, APP, could be used in different platform of mobile phone, such Android or iOS, the designed wearable device also could be used in cross-platform in mobile phone. Therefore, a cross-platform gait analysis and fall detection wearable device (CPGAFDWD) was proposed. Since CPGAFDWD APP was used in web browser without limiting to platform, it could be used for different platforms of mobile phone. The gait analysis could be detected at home. The fall detection also could be executed in any place immediately. The patients and medical staff all could query the status of rehabilitation in any place and any time via the Internet. The experimental results showed that the correct rate of gait analysis and fall detection could be up to 90% in cross-platform of mobile phone. In the future, CPGAFDWD will be planned to be verified by Institutional Review Board, IRB, for clinical treatment.

1. Introduction

In Taiwan, an analysis report from the Health Promotion Administration, HPA, showed that the rehabilitation treatment is more important in modern medicine. It also showed that the fall accident becomes the second accident among all accidents for the elders more than sixty-five years in Taiwan due to significant decline for controlling and balancing muscle, such as gait analysis [1,2,3,4,5].
In Ref. [6], it developed a wearable Freezing of Gait (FOG) collection device for wavelet analysis on shank sagittal velocity signals and a synchronization of loss threshold (SLT) for prediction of FOG in people with Parkinson’s Disease (PD).
In Ref. [7], it proposed a wearable foot gait collection device with step direction algorithm for motion state and direction of feet exercising. By using this wearable device, the burnt calories could be calculated. The health state of user also could be observed at any time and place by using this wearable foot gait collection device.
In Ref. [8], a piecewise linear labeling was proposed to calculate the angular positions and velocities of thigh and torso segments as the training model data based on the variable toe-off onset with different walking speed. By the proposed piecewise linear labeling, the speed adaptability of gait phase estimation could be improved. Estimation accuracy of gait phase could be improved.
In Ref. [9], it showed that the risk of fatal falls for elderly people is getting important. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) also showed that the serious injuries of elderly people may be occurred even if the falling is innocent. Hence, a system with wearable fall detection devices for tracking patient’s whole activity by accelerometer sensors was proposed. The patient’s predetermined alert could be identified and the corresponding alerts could be sent to the patients. Devices for tracking motion with high performance, low power, and low cost included the smart wearable sensors. Data could be decided based on data processing unit.
In Ref. [10], it showed that the fatality may be occurred by fall, especially for elderly people who live alone. Hence, this paper aimed to detect fall by supervised machine learning (ML) algorithms, such as decision tree (DT), k-Nearest Neighbour (k-NN), and support vector machine (SVM). The experimental results showed that the sensitivity and accuracy of DT is better than those of k-NN and SVM.
In Ref. [11], it addressed the necessity of human fall elements by wearable devices regrading falls included signals acquired, features extracted, and algorithms, jointly. In Ref. [12], it proposed a new data augmentation application for different rotation errors in wearable fall detection sensors.
The above mention showed the importance of gait analysis and fall detection. Most of gait analysis was suggested to be executed in any place, such as home, by medical staff to save time and money for patients. Although the gait analysis at home could reduce the time, money, and manpower for patients and medical institutions, how to ensure the motion of gait analysis is correct becomes the first important issue without any medical staff. Moreover, how to upload the data of gait analysis to cloud database and detect the fall accident in real time by APP was another issue.
A cross-platform gait analysis and fall detection wearable device (CPGAFDWD) was thus proposed firstly in this paper. Most of wearable devices were used by APP in mobile device, such as mobile phone. Since the platform of mobile phone may be different, such as iOS and Android, to ensure the APP we designed could be applied for different kinds of platforms is needed. Hence, a cross-platform APP was proposed to be integrated for CPGAFDWD in this paper.
Therefore, a cross-platform gait analysis and fall detection wearable device (CPGAFDWD) was proposed to address the above issues in this paper. The architecture of CPGAFDWD was shown in Figure 1. The user interface of cross-platform APP was shown in Figure 2.
In CPGAFDWD, the development board was used as Arduino board. The sensing modules, such as gyroscope and three-axis accelerometer, were used. The communication modules, such as Bluetooth and WiFi, were used. CPGAFDWD was integrated the Arduino board with the gyroscope, three-axis accelerometer, Bluetooth, and WiFi to detect the gait analysis and fall accident. The sensed data of gait analysis and fall accident from CPGAFDWD were transmitted to APP in real time.
CPGAFDWD collected the sensed data via Bluetooth immediately. Then CPGAFDWD uploaded these data to cloud database called MongoDB, via WiFi or 4G in real time. In CPGAFDWD, a web APP was designed by Node.js. Since web APP was used by browser without constraining to any platform, CPGAFDWD could be used in multi-platform of mobile phone. The users could track the status of gait analysis and receive the alarm of fall accident by CPGAFDWD.
The experiments of gait analysis included the step, length, and angle of pace. In ths statistical treatment with relevant comparisons, our pace step measurement was compared with the actual pace step of laboratory members on walking. Our pace angle measurement was compared with the actual pace angle of laboratory members by using protractor. For the fall detection, it was compared with the actual fall simulated by laboratory members. The experimental results showed that the rate of correct pace step measurement, the rate of correct pace length measurement, and the rate of correct pace angle measurement all could be up to 90%. For the fall detection, the experimental results showed that the detection rate of fall accident could be up to 100%. In the above results, it proved that CPGAFDWD could be applied for gait analysis and fall detection applications.
In CPGAFDWD, the experimental results showed that the user could track the status of gait analysis and receive the alarm of fall accident via the Internet in real time. Moreover, the above results were used in both of iOS and Android to prove that CPGAFDWD could be applied in cross-platform of mobile phone.
The remainder of this paper was arranged in the following sections. Section 2 presented the related work. Section 3 stated our proposed CPGAFDWD. Section 4 stated our experimental results. Section 5 showed the discussion. Finally, Section 6 concluded this paper.

2. Related Work

In Refs. [1,2], it described the importance of fall detection for elders due to deterioration of foot function. To address this issue, a wearable device composed of three-axis accelerometer, gyroscope, and GPS was designed. Hence, the date time and location of fall could be detected by this wearable device.
A multi-condition adaptive step detection algorithm was proposed to improve the pedestrian dead reckoning system for increasing the measurement precision of the stride, step, and heading better than the existed traditional algorithms [3].
In Ref. [4], a linear mixed model was used to determine differences between spatial gait and non-motor symptoms, such as freezing in the levodopa-medicated-state (ON-state) called Parkinson’s disease. The levodopa-medicated-state was divided into non-freezers, freezing with only OFF-levodopa, and freezing with both ON- and OFF-levodopa. The experimental results proved that the variability for intra-patient in spatial gait features in ONOFF-FOG was much higher than those in others.
In Ref. [5], the rehabilitation of balance and gait between sensory retraining (ESR) and implicit repeated exposure (IRE) was evaluated, such as balance, mobility, assessed sensation, and participation. It showed that both of ESR and IRE are all prone to implement for outpatient clinic.
In Ref. [13], it compared the traditional approaches with inertial sensors for the measurement of hip and knee osteoarthritis in remote health care. It showed that the inertial sensors are more suitable for remote health care with extremity osteoarthritis.
The generalizability of deep learning models for predicting outdoor irregular walking surfaces was proposed to show that the results of laboratory-based gait analysis could not be used in real situation. Although the inertial measurement units may be used for real situation, the gait analysis may be still inaccurate since the behavior of walking was more complex in real world. Hence, this paper evaluated the surface classification performance with different data splitting, sensor location, and count by different machine learning models [14].
In the above motion, it showed that the inertial measurement was often used in real situation for gait analysis. It also showed the importance of gait analysis and fall detection. However, none of them could measure the step count, step length, and angle of knee joint measurements with fall detection. Moreover, the wearable with cross-platform APP was not addressed since the cross-platform APP was required recently, such as Android and iOS. Therefore, a cross-platform gait analysis and fall detection wearable device (CPGAFDWD) was proposed to address these issues in this paper.

3. Methods

In this section, it was divided into “Cross-Platform Gait Analysis and Fall Detection Wearable Device” and “Cross-Platform APP” to be depicted.

3.1. Cross-Platform Gait Analysis and Fall Detection Wearable Device

In modern medical, the gait analysis, such as knee joint rehabilitation, and fall detection were getting important, especially for elders [1]. In the existed gait analysis, some of them could be executed at home to save time and money for patients and medical staff. Hence, how to combine health care with technology for residential gait analysis becomes an important issue gradually [3,4,5,13,14].
Although the residential gait analysis could reduce the time money, and manpower, how to judge the correct motion of gait analysis without any help of medical staff becomes an important issue [15,16]. In the same condition, to detect the fall accident correctly was another important issue. Hence, we integrated the Arduino board with gyroscope, three-axis accelerometer, and Bluetooth to develop a gait analysis and fall detection wearable device, GAFDWD, to address the above issues. Compared with [9,10,11,12], the existed fall detection wearable device only focused on fall detection without considering gait analysis. They often aimed to improve the accuracy of fall detection, low power, and low cost. None of them addressed the APP in mobile devices. Moreover, they addressed nothing for cross-platform in mobile devices, such as Android and iOS. Compared with other software, there is no way to call the emergency contact directly, and the emergency contact cannot receive the notification in time. Hence, the above mention was the advantages of CPGAFDWD compared to other software. Since CPGAFDWD included wearable, cross-platform APP, and cloud database, the remote accessing by the Internet was needed. It is also the limitation of CPGAFDWD.
To upload the detected data from GAFDWD to cloud database in real time, to design an APP for GAFDWD was required. Since the APP was depended on the platform of mobile device to be used, how to ensure the APP we designed could be applied for different platforms was an important issue. Hence, a cross-platform APP, CPAPP, was proposed for GAFDWD in this paper. In CPAPP, it received the sensed data captured from CPAPP via Bluetooth, and then sent these data to cloud database, such as MongoDB, via the Internet in real time. The users could track the status of gait analysis and receive the alarm of fall detection by CPAPP immediately.
In GAFDWD, the hardware included gyroscope, three-axis accelerometer, and Bluetooth, as shown in Figure 3. The gyroscope and three-axis accelerometer were used as GY-521. The captured signal from GY-521 was transferred into the sensed data of gait analysis and fall detection by fusion calculation, such as rotation matrix, quaternion, and Euler angle format, respectively. The Bluetooth was used as HM-10 to transmit the sensed data after fusion calculation to CPAPP via Bluetooth. Then CPAPP uploaded the data to cloud database as MongoDB in real time. Figure 4 showed the mechanism for GAFDWD.

3.2. Cross-Platform APP

In cross-platform APP, CPAPP, a web APP by Node.js with MongoDB was designed here. To ensure APP used in Android, the APP is often designed by App Inventor or Android Studio. To ensure APP used in iOS, the APP is often designed by Swift. However, App Inventor and Android Studio only could be developed on Android device. In the same way, Swift only could be developed on Android device. In the above mention, it showed that the cost of R&D, software, and hardware for APP designing in cross-platform is high. Since the web APP is executed by browser, it could not be constrained to different platforms of mobile device. Hence, CPAPP could be applied in multiple platforms, such iOS and Android. In CPAPP, it transmitted the data to cloud database via the Internet immediately while it received the sensed data from GAFDWD via Bluetooth. The data of gait analysis and the alarm of fall detection all could be query and notified by CPAPP in any time and place. A block diagram of the software and the ways of communication between the individual elements of the software was shown in Figure 5.
In this section, it showed the different user interfaces and the corresponding functions of CPAPP, such as login, measurement of pace step, measurement of pace length, measurement of pace angle, and fall detection in both of iOS and Android. Figure 2 had showed the login of CPAPP in both of iOS and Android. In Figure 6 and Figure 7, it showed the measurement of pace step in both of iOS and Android. In Figure 8 and Figure 9, it showed the measurement of pace length in both of iOS and Android. In Figure 10 and Figure 11, it showed the measurement of pace angle in both of iOS and Android. Figure 12 and Figure 13 showed the measurement of fall detection. From Figure 2, Figure 6, Figure 7, Figure 8, Figure 9, Figure 10, Figure 11, Figure 12 and Figure 13, it proved that CPAPP designed in this paper could be applied for cross-platform of mobile device.
Therefore, a cross-platform gait analysis and fall detection wearable device (CPGAFDWD) proposed in this paper could be applied for the real-time residential gait analysis and fall detection in cross-platform of mobile device. The time, money, and manpower could be reduced for patients and medical institutions by CPGAFDWD.

4. Results

To avoid the ethical permission in our experiment, the experimental results were executed by the laboratory members not the real patients and the wearable device should be attached at the ankle [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. The number of laboratory members was more than 20. In the step count (SC), the range of acceleration value was calculated by the first quartile and third quartile values based on quartile method firstly [17,18,19]. After excluding outlier value, the range of acceleration was calculated from −0.28 to 0.17, as shown in Figure 14. Once the value of acceleration was between −0.28 and 0.17, the step count was increased by 1. It showed that the cross-platform gait analysis and fall detection wearable device (CPGAFDWD) we proposed could calculate the step count (SC), accurately. The units of measurement along the x-axes of Figure 14 was microsecond. The units of measurement along the y-axes of Figure 14 was the y value of three-axis acceleration.
The step distance (SD) was calculated by the maximal and minimal acceleration values of one step count with 4th root calculation as in Equation (1), where Amax and Amin were denoted as the maximal and minimal acceleration values, and n was denoted as the total step count [20].
S D = A m a x A m i n 4 × n
The fall detection (FD) was determined by the maximal and minimal acceleration values. After the experimental results executed by the laboratory members with the wearable device we designed at the ankle, the maximal and minimal acceleration values were −2 and 2. Once the value of acceleration was below −2 or over 2, the alarm of FD was triggered. As shown in Figure 15, the value of acceleration from time unit 191 to 210 was below −2 or over 2. In this situation, the alarm of FD was triggered. It proved that CPGAFDWD could detect the fall detection (FD), accurately.
The accurate rate of SC, ARSC, was defined as in Equation (2), where N S C D was defined as the number of detected SC and N S C C was defined as the number of actual correct SC. The error rate of SD, ERSD, was defined as in Equation (3), where N S D D was defined as the number of detected SD and N S D C was defined as the number of actual correct SD. The accurate rate of angle estimation, ARAngle, was defined as in Equation (4), where N A n g l e D was defined as the number of angle estimation and N A n g l e C was defined as the number of actual angle. The accurate rate of FD, ARFD, was defined as in Equation (5), where N F D D was defined as the number of detected FD and N F D C was defined as the number of actual correct FD. In each performance metric, such as ARSC, ERSD, ARAngle, and ARFD, was 20 times in a round. Each experimental result was 10 rounds. Hence, it showed that CPGAFDWD we proposed could calculate the angle, accurately. Moreover, it also showed that CPGAFDWD we proposed could detect the fall, accurately.
A R S C = N S C D N S C C × 100 %
E R S D = N S D C N S D D N S D C × 100 %
A R A n g l e = N A n g l e D N A n g l e C × 100 %
A R F D = N F D D N F D C × 100 %
In the experimental results, the units of measurement along the x-axes of Figure 15 was microsecond. The units of measurement along the y-axes of Figure 15 was the y value of three-axis acceleration. It showed that ARSC was up to 92%, 95%, and 89%, while N S C C was 10, 15, and 20, respectively. The average ARSC by CPGAFDWD was higher than the average ARSC by SVM step classifier [7,20]. ERSD was up to 4%, 8%, and 4%, while N S C C was 10, 15, and 20, respectively. The average ERSD was below 6%. ARAngle was up to 92%, 95%, and 95%, while N A n g l e C was 30, 60, and 90, respectively. The average ARAngle was up to 92%. ERSD was up to 100%, where N S C C was set to 500 and N F D C was set to 10 in each round. The average ARFD was up to 90%.

5. Discussion

In this section, it focused on Cross-Platform APP, CPAPP, such as the different user interfaces and the corresponding functions, firstly. The login of CPAPP in both of iOS and Android was showed in Figure 3. The measurement of pace step in both of iOS and Android was showed in Figure 6 and Figure 7. The measurement of pace length in both of iOS and Android was showed in Figure 8 and Figure 9. The measurement of pace angle in both of iOS and Android was showed in Figure 10 and Figure 11. the measurement of fall detection was showed in Figure 12 and Figure 13. In Figure 6, Figure 7, Figure 8, Figure 9, Figure 10, Figure 11, Figure 12 and Figure 13, it proved that CPAPP designed in this paper could be applied for cross-platform of mobile device, such as Android and iOS.
The basis of reported percentages was calculated based on Equations (1)–(5) and the experimental results were obtained by laboratory members on walking and falling. In the experimental result of gait analysis and fall detection wearable device, GAFDWD, ARSC, ERSD, ARAngle, and ARFD were the performance metrics. ARSC was up to 92%, 95%, and 89%, while N S C C was 10, 15, and 20, respectively. In Refs. [7,20], it used SVM to classify in the walking gait test by a wearable foot gait collection device with step direction algorithm at any time and place as same as our GAFDWD. The experimental results showed that the accuracy rate of SVM is 86%, and only 86 steps are judged for every 100 steps. However, our GAFDWD in walking gait accuracy could reach about 90%.
The average ARSC by CPGAFDWD was higher than the average ARSC by SVM step classifier [7,20]. ERSD was up to 4%, 8%, and 4%, while N S C C was 10, 15, and 20, respectively. The average ERSD was below 6%. ARAngle was up to 92%, 95%, and 95%, while N A n g l e C was 30, 60, and 90, respectively. The average ERSD was below 6% and the average ARAngle was up to 92%. ERSD was up to 100%, where N S C C was set to 500 and N F D C was set to 10 in each round.The minimum ERSD was 4% and the maximal ARAngle was up to 95%. The average ARFD was up to 90%.
The above results showed that the cross-platform gait analysis and fall detection wearable device (CPGAFDWD) proposed in this paper could be applied for gait analysis and fall detection and also could be applied for cross-platform mobile devices. In the future work, the accuracy will be improved in clinical work in the later stage.

6. Conclusions

Due to the progress in medical technology and the advent of an aging society, the rehabilitation treatment gets attention gradually. The rehabilitation methods are different according to different parts of the body and symptoms.
In this paper, it focused on gait analysis, such as step count, step length, and angle of knee joint measurements, since the gait analysis was often needed for elderly. In addition to gait analysis, fall accident was also often occurred for elderly.
In the above mention, it showed the importance for gait analysis and fall detection in modern rehabilitation medicine. However, the existed gait analysis in hospital was still executed by specific medical instruments. In this way, the time and money for patients must increase. The feasibility of gait analysis thus decreased, since the gait analysis could not be executed in any place and any time. For medical institutions, the manpower also increased.
Hence, how to ensure that gait analysis could be executed in any place and any time becomes an important issue. However, how to ensure that the gait analysis was correct at home becomes another important issue, since the incorrect gait analysis may lead to incorrect rehabilitation. The rehabilitation treatments may be discounted.
Therefore, a cross-platform gait analysis and fall detection wearable device, CPGAFDWD, was proposed to address the above issues in this paper. In CPGAFDWD, it aimed to ensure that the gait analysis could be correct without limiting to any time and place for patients. The experimental results also showed that the correct rate of gait analysis was over 90% and the correct rate of fall detection was close to 100%. It proved that CPGAFDWD we proposed could be applied for gait analysis and fall detection in any time and place. The time, money, and manpower thus could be reduced for patients and medical institutions. In the future, we will apply IRB for CPGAFDWD used in clinical medicine.

Author Contributions

M.-H.C. was responsible for Supervision and Project Administration. Y.-C.W. was responsible for Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing—Original Draft, and Writing—Review & Editing. H.-Y.N. was responsible for Resources and Software. Y.-T.C. was responsible for Validation and Formal analysis. S.-H.J. was responsible for Data Curation and Visualization. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

APC was funded by National Science and Technology Council (NSTC) of Taiwan to National Yunlin University of Science and Technology under 111-2221-E-143-002.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This paper was supported by the National Science and Technology Council (NSTC) of Taiwan to National Yunlin University of Science and Technology under 111-2221-E-143-002.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kumar, H.R.; Janardhan, S.; Prakash, D.; Kumar, M.K.P. Fall Detection System using Tri- Axial Accelerometer. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Recent Trends in Electronics, Information & Communication Technology, Bangalore, India, 18–19 May 2018; pp. 1846–1850. [Google Scholar]
  2. Jefiza, A.; Pramunanto, E.; Boedinoegroho, H.; Purnomo, M. Fall Detection Based on Accelerometer and Gyroscope using Back Propagation. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Computer Science and Informatics, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 19–21 September 2017; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  3. Zhang, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Wang, S. Multi-Condition Constraint Adaptive Step Detection Method Based on the Characteristics of Gait. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Ubiquitous Positioning, Indoor Navigation and Location-Based Services, Wuhan, China, 22–23 March 2018; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bridenbaug, S.A.; Kressig, R.W. Laboratory Review: The Role of Gait Analysis in Sensors’ Mobility and Fall Prevention. Gerontology 2011, 57, 256–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Tong, L.; Chen, W.; Song, Q.; Ge, Y. A Research on Automatic Human Fall Detection Method Based on Wearable Inertial Force Information Acquisition System. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, Guilin, China, 19–23 December 2009; pp. 949–953. [Google Scholar]
  6. Tal, K.; Benedetta, H.; Or, K.; Noam, G.; Sharon, H.-B.; Gabi, Z.; Meir, P. Bilateral Leg Stepping Coherence as a Predictor of Freezing of Gait in Patients With Parkinson’s Disease Walking With Wearable Sensors. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 2022, 31, 798–805. [Google Scholar]
  7. Lai, Y.X.; Ma, Y.W.; Huang, Y.M.; Chen, J.L.; Mukhopadhyay, S.C. Ubiquitous Motion Sensing Service Using Wearable Shoe Module and Mobile Device. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Instrumentation and Measurement Technology, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 6–9 May 2013; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  8. Hong, W.; Lee, J.; Hur, P. Piecewise Linear Labeling Method for Speed-Adaptability Enhancement in Human Gait Phase Estimation. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 2022, 31, 628–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Janardhan, K.; Parthasarathi, P.; Karyemsetty, N.; Arunkumar, K.; Krishnamoorthy, R.; Umapathy, K. Device Free Human Body Fall Detection to Aid Senior Citizen. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Communication and Aerospace Technology, Coimbatore, India, 1–3 December 2022; pp. 1158–1162. [Google Scholar]
  10. Wasi, M.W.I.; Dziyauddin, R.A.; Amir, N.I.M.; Ahmad, R. Machine Learning Algorithm for Fall Classification Using Wearable Device. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Future Telecommunication Technologies, Johor Baharu, Malaysia, 14–16 November 2022; pp. 62–66. [Google Scholar]
  11. Edna, A.-R.; Rosero, E. Multimodal Wearable Technology Approaches to Human Falls. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Humanitarian Technology Conference, Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2–4 December 2022; pp. 86–92. [Google Scholar]
  12. Yu, X.; Ma, T.; Jang, J.; Xiong, S. Data Augmentation to Address Various Rotation Errors of Wearable Sensors for Robust Pre-impact Fall Detection. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inf. 2022, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Landes, R.D.; Glover, A.; Pillai, L.; Doerhoff, S.; Virmani, T. Levodopa ONOFF-state freezing of gait: Defining the gait and non-motor phenotype. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0269227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ofek, H.; Alperin, M.; Knoll, T.; Livne, D.; Laufer, Y. Explicit versus implicit lower extremity sensory retraining for post-stroke chronic sensory deficits: A randomized controlled trial. Disabil. Rehabil. 2022, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Rose, M.J.; Costello, K.E.; Eigenbrot, S.; Torabian, K.; Kumar, D. Inertial Measurement Units and Application for Remote Health Care in Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis: Narrative Review. JMIR Rehabil. Assist. Technol. 2022, 9, e33521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Shah, V.; Flood, M.W.; Grimm, B.; Dixon, P.C. Generalizability of Deep Learning Models for Predicting Outdoor Irregular Walking Surfaces. J. Biomech. 2022, 139, 111159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Auvinet, B.; Berrut, G.; Touzard, C.; Moutel, L.; Collet, N.; Chaleil, D.; Barrey, E. Reference data for normal subjects obtained with an accelerometric device. Gait Posture 2002, 16, 124–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Bonomi, A.G.; Goris, A.H.; Yin, B.; Westerterp, K.R. Detection of Type, Duration, and Intensity of Physical Activity Using An Accelerometer. Med. Sci. Sport. Exerc. 2009, 41, 1770–1777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Espy, D.; Yang, F.; Bhatt, T.; Pai, Y.-C. Independent influence of gait speed and step length on stability and fall risk. Gait Posture 2010, 32, 378–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Ambrose, A.F.; Paul, G.; Hausdorff, J.M. Risk factors for falls among older adults: A review of the literature. Maturitas 2013, 75, 51–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Xing, H.; Li, J.; Hou, B.; Zhang, Y.; Guo, M. Pedestrian Stride Length Estimation from IMU Measurements and ANN Based Algorithm. J. Sens. 2017, 2017, 6091261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Riehle, T.H.; Anderson, S.M.; Lichter, P.A.; Whalen, W.E.; Giudice, N.A. Indoor Inertial Waypoint Navigation for the Blind. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Medicine and Biology Society, Osaka, Japan, 3–7 July 2013; pp. 5187–5190. [Google Scholar]
  23. Tumkur, K.; Subbiah, S. Modeling Human Walking for Step Detection and Stride Determination by 3-Axis Accelerometer Readings in Pedometer. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence, Modelling and Simulation, Kuantan, Malaysia, 25–27 September 2012; pp. 199–204. [Google Scholar]
  24. Weinberg, H. Using the ADXL 202 in Pedometer and Personal Navigation Applications. Analog Device, AN-602 APPLICATION NOTE. 2002. Available online: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Using-the-ADXL-202-in-Pedometer-and-Personal-Weinberg/96383a5f1008740f213e2ab48161a65b265f16f6 (accessed on 1 February 2023).
  25. Webster, B.J.; Darter, B.J. Principles of Normal and Pathologic Gait. In Atlas of Orthoses and Assistive Devices, 5th ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 49–62. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Architecture of CPGAFDWD.
Figure 1. Architecture of CPGAFDWD.
Applsci 13 03299 g001
Figure 2. User interface of CPGAFDWD in different platform.
Figure 2. User interface of CPGAFDWD in different platform.
Applsci 13 03299 g002
Figure 3. Hardware of CPGAFDWD.
Figure 3. Hardware of CPGAFDWD.
Applsci 13 03299 g003
Figure 4. Case of CPGAFDWD.
Figure 4. Case of CPGAFDWD.
Applsci 13 03299 g004
Figure 5. Block diagram of the software.
Figure 5. Block diagram of the software.
Applsci 13 03299 g005
Figure 6. Step count detection of CPGAFDWD in Android.
Figure 6. Step count detection of CPGAFDWD in Android.
Applsci 13 03299 g006
Figure 7. Step count detection of CPGAFDWD in iOS.
Figure 7. Step count detection of CPGAFDWD in iOS.
Applsci 13 03299 g007
Figure 8. Step length detection of CPGAFDWD in Android.
Figure 8. Step length detection of CPGAFDWD in Android.
Applsci 13 03299 g008
Figure 9. Step length detection of CPGAFDWD in iOS.
Figure 9. Step length detection of CPGAFDWD in iOS.
Applsci 13 03299 g009
Figure 10. Angle detection of CPGAFDWD in Android.
Figure 10. Angle detection of CPGAFDWD in Android.
Applsci 13 03299 g010
Figure 11. Angle detection of CPGAFDWD in iOS.
Figure 11. Angle detection of CPGAFDWD in iOS.
Applsci 13 03299 g011
Figure 12. Fall detection of CPGAFDWD in Android.
Figure 12. Fall detection of CPGAFDWD in Android.
Applsci 13 03299 g012
Figure 13. Fall detection of CPGAFDWD in iOS.
Figure 13. Fall detection of CPGAFDWD in iOS.
Applsci 13 03299 g013
Figure 14. Acceleration for step count.
Figure 14. Acceleration for step count.
Applsci 13 03299 g014
Figure 15. Acceleration for fall detection.
Figure 15. Acceleration for fall detection.
Applsci 13 03299 g015
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chang, M.-H.; Wu, Y.-C.; Niu, H.-Y.; Chen, Y.-T.; Juang, S.-H. Cross-Platform Gait Analysis and Fall Detection Wearable Device. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 3299. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13053299

AMA Style

Chang M-H, Wu Y-C, Niu H-Y, Chen Y-T, Juang S-H. Cross-Platform Gait Analysis and Fall Detection Wearable Device. Applied Sciences. 2023; 13(5):3299. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13053299

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chang, Ming-Hung, Yi-Chao Wu, Hsi-Yu Niu, Yi-Ting Chen, and Shu-Han Juang. 2023. "Cross-Platform Gait Analysis and Fall Detection Wearable Device" Applied Sciences 13, no. 5: 3299. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13053299

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop