Review Reports
- Philip Ayiku Dzagbletey and
- Jae-Young Chung*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous Reviewer 2: Mithilesh Kumar Reviewer 3: Jalil Rashed-Mohassel
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
The authors of this paper reported screen-printed and inkjet-printed conductive fabric antennas. This work was done with good effort; however, the authors should put their work in context and compare it with other similar work, I recommend the paper to be accepted.
Author Response
Thank you for the comment
Kindly find attached our comments in the author notes.
Author Response File: 
Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
1. “Simulated S11 was recorded 208 at 2.38 to 2.42 GHz (40 MHz) and 2.39 to 2.46 GHz for measured results at -10dB S11.”, Correct it.
2. Explain the method of measurement related to radiation efficiency gain.
3. The all simulated parameters (gain, radiation efficiencies, front-to-back ratio, etc.) related to proposed antenna should be compared by measured. Also put the snap shot of measurement.
4. Author should add recent papers. Improve the comparison table by adding recent papers.
Author Response
Thank you for the comments. Please find attached the pdf of our response.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 3 Report
In Fig. 10, the Measurement results are better than the simulation data, which is not normal. Why? Please comment on the issue.
Author Response
Thank you for the comments. Please find attached our response note.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf