Next Article in Journal
Rapid Detection of Tea Polyphenols in Fresh Tea Leaves Based on Fusion of Visible/Short-Wave and Long-Wave near Infrared Spectroscopy and Its Device Development
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation and Economics of Shale Gas Reserves in the Flysch-Eocene Formation of the Jaca Basin
Previous Article in Special Issue
Single-Shot Three-Dimensional Reconstruction Using Grid Pattern-Based Structured-Light Vision Method
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Defocus Effect Correction for Back Focal Plane Ellipsometry for Antivibration Measurement of Thin Films

Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(3), 1738; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13031738
by Jian Wang 1, Jun Yang 1, Lihua Peng 1,*, Dawei Tang 2, Feng Gao 2, Rong Chen 1 and Liping Zhou 1
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(3), 1738; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13031738
Submission received: 4 January 2023 / Revised: 22 January 2023 / Accepted: 27 January 2023 / Published: 29 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue State-of-the-Art of Optical Micro/Nano-Metrology and Instrumentation)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript is interesting, original and well presented. I recommend the mention MINNOR ERRORS. I list below my comments:

1. Page 2, Eq (1) and Figure 1: please can you explain how is it possible to measure the ellipsometric angles using one polarizer and one analyzer?

2. Page 2, Eq (2): can you please define all the parameters in the equation 2?

3. Page3, line 114: Please check the Abbe's equation.

4. Page 4, line 139: what's the importance of choosing a thick glass plate?

5. Page 5, line 197 and Page 6, line 224: please define Fp used in page 6. Is it the focal point in the page 5, line 197?

6. Page 7, Figure 6: please put the title on the bottom of Figure.

7. Page 8, Figure 7: it is noted psi (min)=835.65. Please revise as RB=835.65.

8. Page 4, 3.2 part, Eq (7) and page 7 and 8: can the authors explain the origin of the ellipsometric parameters error compensation amount. Furthermore, can these two parameters be calibrated with material other than the SiO2 thin film layer?

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

DefocusEffect Correction for BackFocalPlane Ellipsometry for  AntiVibration Measurement of Thin Films

 

The present manuscript describes a proposed method for thin film characterization, where thin films play an important role in the manufacturing of semiconductors and display electronics. One of the major problems in the thin film industry is determining accurately the optical thickness and refractive index of the deposited films. These methods include spectrophotometric techniques, channelled spectra techniques, and ellipsometric techniques. Ellipsometry, which is widely used due to its rapidity, non-destructiveness, and high precision of measurement, is based on monitoring the variation of the state of polarization of the reflected electromagnetic wave upon reflection from a thin film under investigation. After that, the change in the state of polarization of the reflected light is directly related to the optical properties of the films under investigation.

Ellipsometry measurements depend on changing the angle of incidence through a mechanical system (goniometer), so any vibrations would result in signal distortion problems in the ellipsometric measurements and consequent variation in the optical parameters of the investigated film. Therefore, a method to overcome the vibration-induced measurement distortion in thin film online inspection is urgently needed. One of the questions about the calibration and compensation method is whether this method can be used on single-wavelength or spectroscopic ellipsometry equipment.

 

·        One of the questions about the Defocus effect calibration and compensation method can this method be used on single wavelength or spectroscopic ellipsometry equipment’s.

·        What is the effects of the calibration and compensation method for the case of rotating compensator Ellipsometry configuration?

·        SiO2 is very well known sample, did the The author apply their method on apply to another sample?

·        More up to date references could improve the manuscript.

In conclusion, I recommend accepting the manuscript for publication after the addressing the above minor points.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop