Next Article in Journal
A New Model for Human Running Micro-Doppler FMCW Radar Features
Next Article in Special Issue
Experimental and OLGA Modeling Investigation for Slugging in Underwater Compressed Gas Energy Storage Systems
Previous Article in Journal
Changes in Body Mass and Movement Strategy Maintain Jump Height Immediately after Soccer Match
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Numerical Model Comparison of the Energy Conversion Process for an Offshore Hydro-Pneumatic Energy Storage System

1
Faculty of Engineering, University of Malta, MSD 2080 Msida, Malta
2
FLASC B.V., Paardenmarkt 1, 2611 PA Delft, The Netherlands
3
Institute for Sustainable Energy, University of Malta, MXK 1531 Marsaxlokk, Malta
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(12), 7189; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13127189
Submission received: 22 May 2023 / Revised: 13 June 2023 / Accepted: 15 June 2023 / Published: 15 June 2023

Abstract

Energy storage is essential if net zero emissions are to be achieved. In fact, energy storage is a leading solution for reducing curtailment in an energy system that relies heavily on intermittent renewables. This paper presents a comparison between two numerical models which simulate the energy conversion unit performance of a hydro-pneumatic energy storage system. Numerical modelling is performed in PythonTM (Alpha Model) and Mathworks® Simulink® and SimscapeTM (Beta Model). The modelling aims to compare the time-series predictions for the simplified model (Alpha Model) with the more physically representative model (Beta Model). The Alpha Model provides a quasi-steady-state solution, while the Beta Model accounts for machinery inertias and friction within hydraulic flow circuits. Results show that the energy conversion performance simulations between the two models compare well, with a notable difference during system start-up due to the inclusion of transients in the Beta Model. Given its simplicity, the Alpha Model has high computational efficiency, while the Beta Model requires more computational time due to its complexity. This study showed that, despite its simplicity, the Alpha Model is able to generate results that are very similar to those from the Beta Model (with the average RMSE being less than 5%).
Keywords: offshore hydro-pneumatic energy storage; hydraulic machinery; offshore renewables; numerical modelling offshore hydro-pneumatic energy storage; hydraulic machinery; offshore renewables; numerical modelling

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Borg, A.; Sant, T.; Buhagiar, D.; Farrugia, R.N.; Micallef, C. A Numerical Model Comparison of the Energy Conversion Process for an Offshore Hydro-Pneumatic Energy Storage System. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 7189. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13127189

AMA Style

Borg A, Sant T, Buhagiar D, Farrugia RN, Micallef C. A Numerical Model Comparison of the Energy Conversion Process for an Offshore Hydro-Pneumatic Energy Storage System. Applied Sciences. 2023; 13(12):7189. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13127189

Chicago/Turabian Style

Borg, Andrew, Tonio Sant, Daniel Buhagiar, Robert N. Farrugia, and Christopher Micallef. 2023. "A Numerical Model Comparison of the Energy Conversion Process for an Offshore Hydro-Pneumatic Energy Storage System" Applied Sciences 13, no. 12: 7189. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13127189

APA Style

Borg, A., Sant, T., Buhagiar, D., Farrugia, R. N., & Micallef, C. (2023). A Numerical Model Comparison of the Energy Conversion Process for an Offshore Hydro-Pneumatic Energy Storage System. Applied Sciences, 13(12), 7189. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13127189

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop