Maximum Safe Parameters of Ships in Complex Systems of Port Waterways
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Waterway System in Marine Traffic Engineering
- Approach channel;
- Port entrance;
- A number of straight sections and bends in the fairway;
- Port basins of specific terminals and related turning basins.
- Waterway subsystem;
- Subsystem of ship position determination (navigational subsystem);
- Subsystem of traffic control.
- Parameters of ships using the waterway;
- Hydrometeorological conditions, in which, the traffic includes specific types of ships;
- Parameters of vessel traffic intensity in the waterway;
- Conditions of ship maneuvering in the waterway (tug assistance, allowable speeds).
- PIANC;
- ROM (Spanish);
- Japanese;
- CIRM (Centrum Inżynierii Ruchu Morskiego).
- Defines conditions for the safe operation of ships in complex port waterways systems;
- Presents the methodology for determining maximum safe parameters of ships in existing complex port waterways systems.
1.2. Conditions of Safe Operation of Ships in Port Waterways Systems
- Technical parameters of the port area;
- Technical parameters of navigation systems used;
- Prevailing hydrometeorological conditions;
- Conditions of safe operation.
typ | — | Type of ‘maximum ship’; |
Lci | — | Overall length of ‘maximum ship’; |
Bi | — | Breadth of ‘maximum ship’; |
Ti | — | Draft of ‘maximum ship’ in i-th section of waterway; |
Hsti | — | Airdraft in i-th section of waterway (useful while passing under a bridge or overhead power line); |
Vi | — | Allowable speed of ‘maximum ship’ in i-th fairway section; |
Ci | — | Tug assistance in i-th section of fairway, if it is required (required number and bollard pull of tugs); |
Hi | — | Set of hydrometeorological conditions acceptable for ‘maximum ship’ in i-th fairway section. |
d/ni | — | Allowable time of day in i-th section of waterway; |
si | — | Allowable visibility in i-th section of waterway; |
Δhi | — | Allowable drop of water level in i-th section of fairway; |
Vwi | — | Allowable wind speed in i-th section of fairway; |
Vpi | — | Allowable speed of current in i-th section of fairway; |
hfi | — | Allowable wave height in i-th section of fairway. |
typ | — | Type of ‘maximum ship’; |
Lc | — | Maximum overall length of ships that can safely pass through the waterway system (port entrances); |
B | — | Maximum breadth of ships that can safely pass through the waterway system; |
T | — | Maximum draft of ships that can safely pass through the waterway system; |
Hst | — | Maximum airdraft of ships that can safely pass through the waterway system. |
d/n | — | Allowable time of day in the waterway system; |
s | — | Allowable visibility in the waterway system; |
Vw | — | Allowable wind speed in the waterway system. |
- Drop in water level in specific sections (Δhi);
- Exceeded speed of the sea current in specific sections (Vpi);
- Exceeded wave height in specific sections (hfi).
W | — | Conditions of safe ship operation (state vector); |
Ai | — | Subsystem of i-th section of the waterway, determining the area parameters and the type of maneuver performed in that area (area subsystem); |
Ni | — | Subsystem of ship position determination, characterizing parameters of navigational systems in use (navigational system); |
Zi | — | Subsystem of traffic control, characterizing its parameters and waterway capacity. |
- Waterway subsystem;
- Navigational subsystem (ship position determination subsystem).
- The basic maximum parameters of ships that can safely pass through the waterway system cannot be greater than maximum parameters of ships safely passing through all of the sections of the system. Therefore:
- The hydrometeorological conditions that allow for maneuvering in the given waterway system of ships with maximum parameters are identical. This applies to the time of day (d/n), visibility (s) and wind speed (Vw).
2. Methods
- Cargo-handling terminals (port basins): type and maximum parameters of ships handled (typ, LC, B, T);
- Fairways (bends and straight sections): depth (h), width at bottom (D) and slope angle;
- Turning basins: depth (h), length and width (lobr, bobr,) or diameter.
- Approach channel (from an anchorage);
- Port entrance;
- A number of inner fairway sections leading to various terminals;
- Port basins of the terminals;
- Turning basins for ships handled at a given terminal.
- Preliminary determination of ships’ maximum drafts in specific fairway sections:
- 2.
- Determination of maximum overall lengths of ships in turning basins, taking into account the possibility of turning in port basins of the terminals; location of turning basins in the fairway accounting for the length overall of ships safely turned:
- 3.
- The division of the fairway into sections between the turning basins (j turning basins):
- First section: from port entrance (into fairway) to the turning basin where the maximum length ship can be turned ();
- Next sections were determined between subsequent turning basins in the fairway.
- 4.
- Determination of length overall and breadth of of ships safely maneuvering in fairway bends (z). Making calculations by starting from the turning basin where a vessel of greater length can turn, we should assume the safe overall length and breadth of the ship on the fairway section running from the considered turning basin as:
- 5.
- Determination of maximum safe breadths of ships in straight one-way fairway sections ); here, we should assume the safe ship breadth for all straight fairway sections (p) from the considered turning basin as:
- 6.
- Determination of maximum safe lengths and breadths of ships in particular sections between the considered j-th turning basin:
- 7.
- Determination of ship’s safe draft and allowable speeds in specific fairway sections of the considered waterway, taking into account ship and fairway section parameters. The ship speed in individual waterway sections is calculated from this formula:
- 8.
- Determination of maximum parameters of two-way traffic in each fairway section.
- 9.
- Determination of the conditions of safe operation of ships passing through the waterway system between the examined turning basins:
3. Results
- Police (49.4 km of the fairway), handling bulk carriers, chemical tankers and LPG tankers;
- Newly designed Skolwin port (55.7 km) to serve product, chemical and LPG tankers.
- Preliminary maximum draft of ships is:
- The maximum length of ships that can safely turn in four Świnoujście–Szczecin fairway turning basins is, respectively:
- Northern Turning Basin (1.7 km of the fairway), Lco = 300 m, Bo = 50 m—bulk carriers under ballast;
- Mielińska Turning Basin (4.9 km of fairway), Lco = 270 m, Bo = 40 m, To = 11.0 m;
- Przesmyk Orli Turning Basin (63.7 km), Lco = 260 m, Bo = 33 m, To = 9.0 m—cruise ships and Lco = 250 m, Bo = 33 m, To = 11.0 m—container ships
- Parnica Turning Basin (67.3 km of the fairway), Lco = 230 m, Bo = 33 m, To = 11.0 m—bulk carriers;
- Port of Police (49.4 km of the fairway), Lco = 230 m, Bo = 33 m, To = 11.0 m—bulk carriers and chemical tankers;
- Designed Skolwin Port (55.7 km of the fairway), Lco = 230 m, Bo = 35, To = 11.2 m—product tankers and LPG tankers.
- Ingoing vessel entering and berthing port side alongside—loaded bulk carrier: Lc = 300 m, T = 13.2 m;
- Outgoing—bulk carrier under ballast: Lc = 300 m, TD = 7.4 m, TR = 9.0 m; the ship turns around the starboard side in the Northern Turning Basin.
- 3.
- The maximum overall length and breadth of ships safely maneuvering in fairway bends were determined for fairway sections between the turning basins. The calculations were made in this order:
- Northern Turning Basin (1.7 km)—port entrance (0.0 km of the fairway). The maximum overall length and breadth of ships entering the port and approaching the Northern Turning Basin were determined by the simulation method (Figure 3), Lc = 300 m, B = 50 m, T = 13.2 m;
- The Mielińska Turning Basin (4.9 km of the fairway)—Northern Turning Basin. The maximum overall length and breadth of ships safely passing from the Northern to Mielińska Turning Basins were determined by the simulation method Lc = 270 m, B = 40 m, T = 11.0 m [16]. In addition, the navigational risk of maximum ship passage was examined in connection with the planned arrivals of a ferry Lc = 220 m at berth No 2 of the ferry terminal in Świnoujście. The risk that the maneuvering ship moves out of the available navigable area and passenger fatalities occur R = 2.8 × 10−7 [year−1] is lower than the acceptable risk [18].
- Przesmyk Orli Turning Basin (63.7 km of the fairway)—Mielińska Turning Basin. The maximum overall length and breadth of ships safely maneuvering in the fairway bends (turns) between Mielińska and Przesmyk Orli Turning Basins were determined by the simulation method. The tests were conducted using a Kongsberg-made FMBS simulator in three fairway bends: Mańków, Ińskie-Babina and Święta. A simulation experiment was conducted for a cruise ship Lc = 260 m, B = 33.0 m, T = 9.0 m, and container ship Lc = 250 m, B = 33.0 m, T = 11.0 m [16]. Two series of tests were conducted in least favorable hydrometeorological conditions for each bend. The simulation experiment consisting of 12 passages in one series was performed by port pilots. Figure 5 shows statistically processed test results for the Święta bend. The results refer to the safe maneuvering areas for a cruise ship sailing through the bend in the least favorable hydrometeorological conditions;
- There are no bends between Parnica (57.3 km) and Przesmyk Orli Turning Basins.
- 4.
- The maximum breadth of ships safely maneuvering in straight fairway sections was determined after transforming the condition of navigational safety, defined in the empirical CIRM method [3,15]. This condition can be written as:
Dj — Width at bottom of j-th point of the fairway center line for safe depth (available width of the navigable area) [m]; dm — Deterministic maneuvering component of the swept path width [m]; dn(1− α) — Probabilistic navigational component of the swept path width [m] of the ship at a given confidence level (1-α) [m]; — Reserve of maneuvering area width on the right-hand side [m]; — Reserve of maneuvering area width on the left-hand side [m];
k | — | Coefficient determining the ship’s maneuverability, dependent on ship type k = f (typ). |
- 5.
- Maximum safe lengths, breadths and drafts of ships between Świnoujście–Szczecin fairway turning areas were calculated as above and are equal to:
- Northern Turning Area—port entrance channel: Lc = 300 m, B = 50 m, T =13.2 m;
- Mielińska to Northern Turning Areas: Lc = 270 m, B = 40 m, T = 11.0 m;
- Przesmyk Orli to Mielińska Turning Areas:
- Lc = 260 m, B = 33 m, T = 9.0 m—cruise carrier;
- Lc = 240 m, B = 33 m, T = 11.0 m—container ship;
- Lc = 230 m, B = 33 m, T = 11.0 m—bulk carrier;
- Parnica to Przesmyk Orli Turning Areas: Lc = 230 m, B = 33 m, T = 11.0 m—bulk carrier.
- 6.
- Safe allowable speeds of ships in specific sections of the Świnoujście–Szczecin fairway were determined by starting from the basic condition of navigational safety
Δ | − | Underkeel clearance. |
- Static method;
- Dynamic method.
Δ1 | — | Water allowance for sounding error, depending on the depth of the area; |
Δ2 | — | Navigational allowance due to the discontinuity of soundings; |
Δ3 | — | Allowance for siltation, depending on the area; |
Δ4 | — | Allowance for the height of tide determination error, depending on the shipping area; |
Δ5 | — | Allowance for the error of water level determination due to water level fluctuations relative to chart datum; |
Δ6 | — | Allowance for the draft determination error, depending on the type of ship; |
Δ7 | — | Allowance for ship’s list assessment error, depending on ship parameters. |
Δ8 | — | Allowance for moving ship squat, depending on ship’s speed, draft, depth and other area parameters; |
Δ9 | — | Allowance for waves, depending on wave and ship parameters. |
- Tuck;
- Huuska/Guliev;
- ICORELS;
- Barras3;
- Eryuzlu2.
- Container ships, general cargo ships, LPG tankers (Cb ≤ 0.65) V = 8 to 12 knots;
- Bulk carriers, tankers (Cb ≥ 0.75) V = 6 to 10 knots.
- 7.
- The passing of two ships in the Świnoujście–Szczecin fairway require the determination of maximum safe breadths of the meeting ships, depending on their draft and the fairway channel slope (Table 2).
— | Width of available navigable area for ships with draft T in i-th section of the fairway; | |
— | Separation zone allowing for the suction force effect; | |
in, out | — | Indices marking incoming and outgoing ships. |
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
- The determination of maximum safe lengths of ships in specific turning basins and ship drafts;
- The waterway division between turning basins, depending on the maximum length of ships turned there;
- The determination of maximum lengths and breadths of ships safely maneuvering in fairway bends (turns) between the turning basins;
- The determination of maximum safe breadths of ships in straight fairway sections between the turning basins;
- The determination of the allowable speed of ships in specific fairway sections;
- The determination of ship parameters in two-way traffic lanes;
- The determination of conditions for the safe operation of ships in a complex port waterway system.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Olba, X.B.; Daamen, W.; Vellinga, T.; Hoogendoorn, S.P. State-of-the-Art of Port Simulation Models for Risk and Capacity Assessment Based on the Vessel Navigational Behaviour through the Nautical Infrastructure. J. Traffic Transp. Eng. (Engl. Ed.) 2018, 5, 335–347. [Google Scholar]
- Formela, K.; Weintrit, A.; Neumann, T. Overview of Definitions of Maritime Safety, Safety at Sea, Navigational Safety and Safety in General. TransNav Int. J. Mar. Navig. Saf. Sea Transp. 2019, 13, 285–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gucma, S.; Zalewski, P. Optimization of Fairway Design Parameters: Systematic Approach to Manoeuvring Safety. Int. J. Nav. Archit. Ocean. Eng. 2020, 12, 129–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reshnyak, V.; Sokolov, S.; Nyrkov, A.; Budnik, V. Inland Waterway Environmental Safety. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2018, 1015, 042049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Froese, J. Safe and Efficient Port Approach by Vessel Traffic Management in Waterways. In Transport of Water versus Transport over Water: Exploring the Dynamic Interplay of Transport and Water; Ocampo-Martinez, C., Negenborn, R.R., Eds.; Operations Research/Computer Science Interfaces Series; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 281–296. ISBN 978-3-319-16133-4. [Google Scholar]
- Shang, J.; Wang, W.; Peng, Y.; Tian, Q.; Tang, Y.; Guo, Z. Simulation Research on the Influence of Special Ships on Waterway through Capacity for a Complex Waterway System: A Case Study for the Port of Meizhou Bay. Simulation 2020, 96, 387–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rushidh, M.D.; Suhuraa, S.; Reddya, L.R.; Dwarakisha, G.S. Planning of Marine Facilities for an LNG Terminal in India. In Proceedings of the GITA-2K15, SMVITM, Bantakal, India, 16–17 October 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, L. Discussion on the Method for Determining the Harbor Channel Design Width-Take the Proposed 250,000 ton Waterway of Panjin Harbor for Instance. Adv. Mater. Res. 2015, 1065, 480–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, W.S.; Park, Y.S. A Study on the Design of Coastal Fairway Width Based on a Risk Assessment Model in Korean Waterways. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gucma, S.; Gralak, R.; Muczyński, B. Areas of Emergency Maneuvers and the Navigational Risk of Accidents in Fairways Due to Ship Technical Failures Determined by the Ship Movement Simulation Method. Zesz. Nauk. Akad. Mor. Szczec. 2020, 61, 39–47. [Google Scholar]
- Gucma, S. Conditions of Safe Ship Operation in Seaports–Optimization of Port Waterway Parameters. Pol. Marit. Res. 2019, 3, 22–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gucma, S.; Gralak, R. Probabilistic-Deterministic Method of Rescaling Ship Manoeuvring Simulation Data Defining Parameters of Fairway Bends. New Trends Prod. Eng. 2018, 1, 127–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Akram, M.A.; Liu, P.; Wang, Y.; Qian, J. GNSS Positioning Accuracy Enhancement Based on Robust Statistical MM Estimation Theory for Ground Vehicles in Challenging Environments. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Thoresen, C.A. Port Designer’s Handbook; Thomas Telford: London, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Gucma, S. Studying Sea Waterway System with the Aid of Computer Simulation Methods. Pol. Marit. Res. 2015, 22, 10–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maritime University of Szczecin (Szczecin, Poland). Navigational Analysis of Modernization of the Waterway Swinoujscie-Szczecin (Deepening to 12.5 m). 2015; not intended for publication. [Google Scholar]
- Maritime University of Szczecin (Szczecin, Poland). Analysis of Ship Operation Safety in the Świnoujście—Szczecin Fairway. 2021; not intended for publication. [Google Scholar]
- Bąk, A.; Gucma, S.; Przywarty, M. The Safety of Navigation in Restricted Areas—Method of Risk Estimation and Analysis. Maritime University of Szczecin: Szczecin, Poland, 2022; Unpublished. [Google Scholar]
- McBride, M.; Boll, M.; Briggs, M. Harbour Approach Channels—Design Guidelines; PIANC: Brussels, Belgium, 2014. [Google Scholar]
Kilometer of Fairway | Type of Section | Radius [m] | Width Max [m] | Width Min [m] | Depth Max [m] | Depth Min [m] | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
from | to | ||||||
0 | 5.3 | Port Świnoujście | |||||
5.3 | 7.6 | Straight | 130 | 130 | 14.0 | 12.5 | |
8.1 | 9.1 | Straight | 110 | 110 | 12.5 | 12.5 | |
9.8 | 10.9 | Bend | 2300 | 120 | 120 | 14.0 | 12.5 |
11.4 | 17.0 | Straight | 110 | 110 | 18.0 | 12.5 | |
17.4 | 23.0 | Straight | 100 | 100 | 12.5 | 12.5 | |
23.8 | 28.8 | Straight | 250 | 250 | 12.5 | 12.5 | |
29.6 | 40.9 | Straight | 100 | 100 | 12.5 | 12.5 | |
41.2 | 43.0 | Bend | 2200 | 155 | 110 | 12.5 | 12.5 |
43.0 | 48.6 | Straight | 110 | 110 | 12.5 | 12.5 | |
48.8 | 49.5 | Bend + Turning basin | 350 | 150 | 12.5 | 12.5 | |
49.5 | 51.5 | Straight | 350 | 220 | 14.0 | 12.5 | |
52.0 | 53.0 | Bend | 1680 | 150 | 150 | 13.0 | 12.5 |
53.2 | 54.4 | Straight | 130 | 130 | 12.5 | 12.5 | |
54.7 | 55.4 | Bend | 1730 | 150 | 150 | 12.5 | 12.5 |
55.6 | 59.0 | Straight | 100 | 100 | 12.5 | 12.5 | |
59.4 | 60.5 | Bend | 1600 | 150 | 150 | 12.5 | 12.5 |
60.8 | 62.9 | Straight | 100 | 100 | 12.5 | 12.5 | |
63.4 | 64.0 | Turning basin | 360 | 360 | 12.5 | 12.5 | |
64.3 | 66.6 | Straight | 100 | 90 | 12.5 | 12.5 | |
66.7 | 67.0 | Straight | 130 | 130 | 12.5 | 12.5 | |
67.1 | 67.4 | Turning basin | 330 | 330 | 12.5 | 12.5 |
T1 + T2 [m] | B1 + B2 [m] | ||
---|---|---|---|
Slope Inclination | |||
1:2 | 1:3 | 1:4 | |
8 | 32 | 40 | 47 |
9 | 31 | 38 | 45 |
10 | 30 | 36 | 43 |
11 | 29 | 34 | 41 |
12 | 28 | 33 | 39 |
13 | 27 | 32 | 37 |
14 | 26 | 31 | 35 |
15 | 25 | 30 | 34 |
16 | 24 | 28 | 32 |
17 | 23 | 27 | 30 |
18 | 22 | 26 | 28 |
19 | 21 | 25 | 27 |
20 | 20 | 23 | 25 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Gucma, S.; Gucma, M.; Gralak, R.; Przywarty, M. Maximum Safe Parameters of Ships in Complex Systems of Port Waterways. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 7692. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12157692
Gucma S, Gucma M, Gralak R, Przywarty M. Maximum Safe Parameters of Ships in Complex Systems of Port Waterways. Applied Sciences. 2022; 12(15):7692. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12157692
Chicago/Turabian StyleGucma, Stanisław, Maciej Gucma, Rafał Gralak, and Marcin Przywarty. 2022. "Maximum Safe Parameters of Ships in Complex Systems of Port Waterways" Applied Sciences 12, no. 15: 7692. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12157692
APA StyleGucma, S., Gucma, M., Gralak, R., & Przywarty, M. (2022). Maximum Safe Parameters of Ships in Complex Systems of Port Waterways. Applied Sciences, 12(15), 7692. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12157692