Next Article in Journal
Experimental Investigation of Oxygen Carrier Aided Combustion (OCAC) with Methane and PSA Off-Gas
Next Article in Special Issue
HARVEST: High-Resolution Haptic Vest and Fingertip Sensing Glove That Transfers Tactile Sensation of Fingers to the Back
Previous Article in Journal
Thermoelastic Investigation of Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced Composites Using a Drop-Weight Impact Test
Previous Article in Special Issue
Telelocomotion—Remotely Operated Legged Robots
Review

Review of Advanced Medical Telerobots

1
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, New York University (NYU), Brooklyn, NY 11201, USA
2
Advanced Robotics and Controls Lab, University of San Diego, San Diego, CA 92110, USA
3
Ampère, INSA Lyon, CNRS (UMR5005), F69621 Villeurbanne, France
4
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, New York University (NYU), Brooklyn, NY 11201, USA
5
NYU WIRELESS, Brooklyn, NY 11201, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mehrdad and Liu contributed equally to this work and share the first authorship.
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(1), 209; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11010209
Received: 25 November 2020 / Revised: 17 December 2020 / Accepted: 21 December 2020 / Published: 28 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Haptics for Tele-Communication and Tele-Training)
The advent of telerobotic systems has revolutionized various aspects of the industry and human life. This technology is designed to augment human sensorimotor capabilities to extend them beyond natural competence. Classic examples are space and underwater applications when distance and access are the two major physical barriers to be combated with this technology. In modern examples, telerobotic systems have been used in several clinical applications, including teleoperated surgery and telerehabilitation. In this regard, there has been a significant amount of research and development due to the major benefits in terms of medical outcomes. Recently telerobotic systems are combined with advanced artificial intelligence modules to better share the agency with the operator and open new doors of medical automation. In this review paper, we have provided a comprehensive analysis of the literature considering various topologies of telerobotic systems in the medical domain while shedding light on different levels of autonomy for this technology, starting from direct control, going up to command-tracking autonomous telerobots. Existing challenges, including instrumentation, transparency, autonomy, stochastic communication delays, and stability, in addition to the current direction of research related to benefit in telemedicine and medical automation, and future vision of this technology, are discussed in this review paper. View Full-Text
Keywords: teleoperation; medical robotics; share autonomy; multilateral telerobotics; telerehabilitation; telesurgery teleoperation; medical robotics; share autonomy; multilateral telerobotics; telerehabilitation; telesurgery
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Mehrdad, S.; Liu, F.; Pham, M.T.; Lelevé, A.; Atashzar, S.F. Review of Advanced Medical Telerobots. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 209. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11010209

AMA Style

Mehrdad S, Liu F, Pham MT, Lelevé A, Atashzar SF. Review of Advanced Medical Telerobots. Applied Sciences. 2021; 11(1):209. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11010209

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mehrdad, Sarmad, Fei Liu, Minh T. Pham, Arnaud Lelevé, and S. F. Atashzar 2021. "Review of Advanced Medical Telerobots" Applied Sciences 11, no. 1: 209. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11010209

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop