Next Article in Journal
Integrated Replay Spoofing-Aware Text-Independent Speaker Verification
Next Article in Special Issue
Method for Systematic Assessment of Requirement Change Risk in Industrial Practice
Previous Article in Journal
Stroke Kinematics Analysis and Hydrodynamic Modeling of a Buoyancy-Supported Water Strider Robot
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Objective Space and the Formulation of Design Requirement in Natural Laminar Flow Optimization
Article

Revisiting Problem-Solution Co-Evolution in the Context of Team Conceptual Design Activity

1
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
2
Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Luleå University of Technology, 97187 Luleå, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2020, 10(18), 6303; https://doi.org/10.3390/app10186303
Received: 31 July 2020 / Revised: 7 September 2020 / Accepted: 8 September 2020 / Published: 10 September 2020
The conventional prescriptive and descriptive models of design typically decompose the overall design process into elementary processes, such as analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. This study revisits some of the assumptions established by these models and investigates whether they can also be applied for modelling of problem-solution co-evolution patterns that appear during team conceptual design activities. The first set of assumptions concerns the relationship between performing analysis, synthesis, and evaluation and exploring the problem and solution space. The second set concerns the dominant sequences of analysis, synthesis, and evaluation, whereas the third set concerns the nature of transitions between the problem and solution space. The assumptions were empirically tested as part of a protocol analysis study of team ideation and concept review activities. Besides revealing inconsistencies in how analysis, synthesis, and evaluation are defined and interpreted across the literature, the study demonstrates co-evolution patterns, which cannot be described by the conventional models. It highlights the important role of analysis-synthesis cycles during both divergent and convergent activities, which is co-evolution and refinement, respectively. The findings are summarised in the form of a model of the increase in the number of new problem and solution entities as the conceptual design phase progresses, with implications for both design research and design education. View Full-Text
Keywords: co-evolution; engineering design; conceptual design; design activity; design team co-evolution; engineering design; conceptual design; design activity; design team
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Martinec, T.; Škec, S.; Perišić, M.M.; Štorga, M. Revisiting Problem-Solution Co-Evolution in the Context of Team Conceptual Design Activity. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 6303. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10186303

AMA Style

Martinec T, Škec S, Perišić MM, Štorga M. Revisiting Problem-Solution Co-Evolution in the Context of Team Conceptual Design Activity. Applied Sciences. 2020; 10(18):6303. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10186303

Chicago/Turabian Style

Martinec, Tomislav, Stanko Škec, Marija M. Perišić, and Mario Štorga. 2020. "Revisiting Problem-Solution Co-Evolution in the Context of Team Conceptual Design Activity" Applied Sciences 10, no. 18: 6303. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10186303

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop