Application of Response Surface Methodology, Isotherms, and Kinetics in Metronidazole Removal from Water Using Highly Porous Maize Cob Activated Carbon
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Chemicals and Materials
2.2. Preparation of Adsorbate Stock Solution
2.3. Preparation of Activated Carbon from Maize Cob
2.4. Characterization of the Maize Cob Activated Carbon
2.4.1. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy
2.4.2. Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM)
2.4.3. Powder X-Ray Diffraction (PXRD)
2.4.4. High-Resolution Transmission Electron Microscope (HRTEM)
2.4.5. Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET)
2.5. Batch Experiments
2.6. Regeneration Studies
2.7. Response Surface Methodology
2.8. Functions for Error Analysis
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Characterization of the Synthesized Maize Cob-Activated Carbon
3.2. Process Parameter Optimization
3.3. Quadratic Model Based on ANOVA Studies
3.4. 3D Surface Plots
3.5. 2D Contour Plots
3.6. Run Number, Box–Cox, Experimental, Actual, and Residual Values
3.7. Kinetic Studies for the Adsorption of MNZ
3.8. Isotherms, Both Linear and Non-Linear

3.9. Application in Real Water Samples

3.10. Reusability
3.11. Comparative Studies of MC-AC with Literature
4. Conclusions
5. Future Perspectives
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| MNZ | Metronidazole |
| RSM | Response surface methodology |
| MC | Maize cob |
| AC | Activated carbon |
| PFO | Pseudo-first order |
| PSO | Pseudo-second order |
| BBD | Box–Behnken design |
References
- Meng, X.; Wang, K.; Xu, J.; Shao, X.; Xu, W. The Governance Logic of Green Technology Diffusion Under Ecological Civilization: The Case of Formaldehyde-Free Biomass Adhesive Industrialization. Sustainability 2026, 18, 1477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gidado, S.M.; Olumoh, J.S.; Tyndall, J.; Inyang, V.; Raji, H.; Agboola, B. Assessment of the usage of plastic products, their disposal methods and the impacts on the environment: A case study in Yola, North-Eastern Nigeria. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2026, 198, 511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Giosafatto, C.V.L.; Avitabile, M.; Famiglietti, M.; Kordjazi, T.; Moosavi-Nasab, M.; Restaino, O.F.; Mariniello, L. Sustainable bioplastics manufacturing from renewable sources. FEBS Open Bio 2026, 16, 686–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Venkatesh, M.; Isloor, A.M.; Farnood, R.; Porawati, H. Hybrid metal organic framework-polyethersulfone hollow fiber membrane interface for advanced ultrafiltration of microplastics, dyes, heavy metals, and salts: Toward sustainable development goals for wastewater treatment. Curr. Res. Green Sustain. Chem. 2026, 12, 100518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamdi, R. Assessing Sustainable Approaches in the Face of Industrial Chemical Pollution of Freshwater. Sustainability 2026, 18, 3476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hatvate, N.T.; Akolkar, H.N.; Haghi, A.K. Sources and Types of Microplastics in Wastewater Systems. In Microplastics in Wastewater: A Global Perspective on Implementing Sustainable Development; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2026; pp. 19–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, P.; Kaur, J.; Rahul; Kaur, P.; Malik, S. Nanomaterials in Water Purification: From Pathogens to Microplastics and Heavy Metals. In Nanotechnology in Environmental Science and Healthcare; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2026; pp. 55–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karume, I.; Bbumba, S.; Kigozi, M.; Nabatanzi, A.; Mukasa, I.H.Z.T.; Yiga, Z.T. One-pot removal of pharmaceuticals and toxic heavy metals from water using xerogel-immobilized quartz/banana peels-activated carbon. Green Chem. Lett. Rev. 2023, 16, 2238726. [Google Scholar]
- Singh, D.; Kushwaha, J.; Shankar, R.; Singh, S.; Mishra, V.; Singh, D.; Mishra, A.; Singhania, R.R.; Patel, A.K.; Giri, B.S. Pharmaceutical Wastewater as an Emerging Environmental Contaminant: Sustainable Treatment Strategies and Future Perspectives. Bioengineering 2026, 13, 540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dejus, B.; Tedoldi, E.L.; Dejus, S.; Kairisa, L.; Rajarao, G.K. The Life Cycle Assessment of Filamentous Fungi in Pharmaceutical Bioremediation and Wastewater Management: A Critical Review. ACS ES&T Water 2026, 6, 2637–2655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brillas, E.; Peralta-Hernández, J.M. Advances in Hybrid Photo-Fenton Processes for Treating Pharmaceutical Contaminants in Water and Wastewater Systems. Water 2026, 18, 920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seralathan, K.-K.; Sagadevan, S.; Fatimah, I.; Lett, J.A.; Kaus, N.H.M.; Al-Anber, M.A. Addressing the Persistent Threat of Emerging Micropollutants: Innovative Treatment Technologies for Protecting Human Health and Ecosystem Stability. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2026, 237, 247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mushtaq, Q.; Akhtar, M.; Fatima, D.; Hedar, M.; Anwar, A.; Intisar, A. Carbon nanotubes: Conventional and green methods of synthesis and adsorptive mitigation of pharmaceuticals from water. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2026, 23, 271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamdy, A.M.; Abu-Bakr, R.I.; El-Hay, S.S.A.; Sayed, R.A. Simultaneous spectrophotometric eco-friendly analysis of triple-drug H. pylori regimen (Vonoprazan, Amoxicillin, Metronidazole) for quality control and in vitro dissolution testing. Sci. Rep. 2026, 16, 12793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Suvarna, V.; Murahari, M.; Pawar, S. Metronidazole—An Old Drug for Structure Optimization and Repurposing. Chem. Biodivers. 2025, 22, e03389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chua, K.Y. Metronidazole. In Kucers’ the Use of Antibiotics; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2017; pp. 1807–1849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Slaouti, H.; Djellouli, F.; Chaib, B.; Saada, Z. Influence of metal complex formation on the biological activity of metronidazole: Spectroscopic, DFT calculation, in vitro and in silico biological activity. Pure Appl. Chem. 2026, 98, 881–899. [Google Scholar]
- Bbumba, S.; Karume, I.; Nsamba, H.K.; Kigozi, M.; Kato, M. An Insight into Isotherm Models in Physical Characterization of Adsorption Studies. Eur. J. Appl. Sci. 2024, 12, 115–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karume, I.; Bbumba, S.; Tewolde, S.; Mukasa, I.H.Z.T.; Ntale, Z.T. Impact of carbonization conditions and adsorbate nature on the performance of activated carbon in water treatment. BMC Chem. 2023, 17, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Danu, B.Y.; Bandoh, C.K.; Adusei, J.K.; Haruna, M.; Kangmennaa, A.; Yeboah, P.; Ampong, F.K.; Agorku, E. Carbon-based materials for the removal of organic dyes from wastewater. Discov. Nano 2026, 21, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tokinova, R.; Rozhin, A.; Rozhina, E. Sustainable Clay-Based Nanocomposites for Algal Toxin Remediation. J. Compos. Sci. 2026, 10, 259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H.; Hu, Q.; Huang, H.; Chen, L.; Zhang, C.; Jin, Y.; Zhang, W. Adsorption and Removal of Emerging Pollutants from Water by Activated Carbon and Its Composites: Research Hotspots, Recent Advances, and Future Prospects. Water 2026, 18, 300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, B.; Liu, Y.; Hou, B.; Li, Q.; Mao, D.; Li, X.; Feng, S.; Tan, Y.; Zhao, D.; Yu, H.; et al. Pore size-matched adsorption of organic pollutants and its pilot application in advanced wastewater treatment. Water Res. 2026, 300, 126009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hossen, M.S.; Islam, T.; Hasan, M.Z.; Bashar, M.M.; Luo, L.; Narita, F. Biomass-Derived Activated Carbon: A Promising Candidate for Multifunctional Approach Toward Sustainable Advanced Materials. Adv. Sustain. Syst. 2026, 10, e01559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cansado, I.P.d.P.; Mourão, P.A.M.; Castanheiro, J.E.F.; Geraldo, P.F.; Suhas; Suero, S.R.; Cano, B. Review on Treatment Pathways and Adsorptive Approaches for Dye-Contaminated Wastewater. Processes 2026, 14, 898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bbumba, S.; Karume, I. Comparative analysis of ANFIS, ANN, and BBD for enhanced prediction of methyl orange adsorption in water treatment. Sci. Rep. 2026, 16, 12822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cachola Maldito Lowden, V.M.; Alexandre-Franco, M.F.; Garrido-Zoido, J.M.; Cuerda-Correa, E.M.; Gómez-Serrano, V. Coconut shell-derived activated carbons: Preparation, physicochemical properties, and dye removal from water. Molecules 2026, 31, 263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bernal, V.; Goulart de Araujo, L.; Castro-Gutiérrez, J.; Moreno-Piraján, J.C.; Giraldo, L.; Celzard, A.; Fierro, V. Effective removal of the anticancer drug 5-fluorouracil from water using a sustainable tannin-derived carbon. J. Environ. Manag. 2026, 403, 129068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yu, S.; Li, S.; Hu, H.; Gao, L.; Huang, Y.; Pu, F.; Yao, H. Enhanced VOCs adsorption mechanism on biochar synthesized by one-step molten salt thermal treatment: Experimental and DFT insights. J. Environ. Manag. 2026, 397, 128310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kigozi, M.; Koech, R.K.; Kingsley, O.; Ojeaga, I.; Tebandeke, E.; Kasozi, G.N.; Onwualu, A.P. Synthesis and characterization of graphene oxide from locally mined graphite flakes and its supercapacitor applications. Results Mater. 2020, 7, 100113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bbumba, S.; Kigozi, M.; Nabatanzi, J.; Karume, I.; Arum, C.T.; Nsamba, H.K.; Kiganda, I.; Murungi, M.; Ssekatawa, J.; Nazziwa, R.A. Response Surface Methodology: A Review on Optimization of Adsorption Studies. Asian J. Chem. Sci. 2024, 14, 106–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bbumba, S.; Kigozi, M.; Karume, I.; Arum, C.T.; Murungi, M.; Babirye, P.M.; Kirabo, S. Prediction and Optimization of Process Parameters Using Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Models. Asian J. Appl. Chem. Res. 2025, 16, 11–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eraslan, Y.; Şengün, E. Parametric Optimization of VLM Panel Discretization Using Bio-Inspired Crayfish and Aquila Algorithms Coupled with Hybrid RSM-Based Ensemble Machine Learning Surrogate Models: A Case Study. Biomimetics 2026, 11, 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Das, A.; Gupta, D.; Uppaluri, R.V.S.; Mitra, S. Application of RSM-DF and RSM-ANN-TLBO optimization techniques for enhancing the performance of nanozyme derived from spent mushroom substrate biochar. Biomass Bioenergy 2026, 211, 109154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kigozi, M.; Koech, R.K.; Orisekeh, K.; Kali, R.; Kamoga, O.L.M.; Padya, B.; Bello, A.; Kasozi, G.N.; Jain, P.K.; Kirabira, J.B. Cobs Porous Carbon-Based Materials With High Energy And Excellent Cycle Stability For Supercapacitor Applications. Res. Sq. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yusuf, M.O. Bond characterization in cementitious material binders using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 3353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sonibare, O.O.; Haeger, T.; Foley, S.F. Structural characterization of Nigerian coals by X-ray diffraction, Raman and FTIR spectroscopy. Energy 2010, 35, 5347–5353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rane, A.V.; Kanny, K.; Abitha, V.K.; Thomas, S. Methods for Synthesis of Nanoparticles and Fabrication of Nanocomposites. In Synthesis of Inorganic Nanomaterials: Advances and Key Technologies; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2018; pp. 121–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Munir, K.S.; Li, Y.; Liang, D.; Qian, M.; Xu, W.; Wen, C. Effect of dispersion method on the deterioration, interfacial interactions and re-agglomeration of carbon nanotubes in titanium metal matrix composites. Mater. Des. 2015, 88, 138–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moses, K.; Karume, I.; Bbumba, S.; Parvathalu, K.; Kasozi, G.; Tebandeke, E. None-emission carbon nanomaterial derived from polystyrene plastic waste for the adsorption of carbon dioxide. Results Mater. 2025, 26, 100671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sangeetha, D.N.; Selvakumar, M. Active-defective activated carbon/MoS2 composites for supercapacitor and hydrogen evolution reactions. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 453, 132–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eleri, O.E.; Azuatalam, K.U.; Minde, M.W.; Trindade, A.M.; Muthuswamy, N.; Lou, F.; Yu, Z. Towards high-energy-density supercapacitors via less-defects activated carbon from sawdust. Electrochim. Acta 2020, 362, 137152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sinha, P.; Datar, A.; Jeong, C.; Deng, X.; Chung, Y.G.; Lin, L.-C. Surface area determination of porous materials using the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method: Limitations and improvements. J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123, 20195–20209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohan, V.B.; Jayaraman, K.; Bhattacharyya, D. Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) specific surface area analysis of different graphene materials: A comparison to their structural regularity and electrical properties. Solid State Commun. 2020, 320, 114004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sözcü, Ş.; Wiener, J.; Frajová, J.; Venkataraman, M.; Tomková, B.; Kalmár, J.; Forgács, A.; Militký, J. Effect of drying methods on Acetobacter xylinum bacterial cellulose aerogels and cryogels. Sci. Rep. 2026, 16, 12264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ezati, S.; Ganjidoust, H.; Ayati, B. Hybrid Application of Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and Machine Learning for Multi-objective Optimization of Heterogeneous Electro-Fenton Process in Pharmaceutical Wastewater Treatment. Results Eng. 2026, 30, 109818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bian, H.; Xi, T.; Feng, Y.; Chen, J.; Wang, W.; Zhao, Z.; Wang, S.; Wei, W.; Zhou, X. Highly efficient Ag@β-FeOOH/cellulose nanofibril composite hydrogel for rapid photocatalytic degradation of tetracycline under visible light. Carbon Resour. Convers. 2026, 9, 100434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, S.; Wen, M.; Lv, Z.; Chen, L.; Liu, T.; Hou, X. Predicting the properties of metamaterials consisting of curved-wall triangles using ensemble neural networks with interpretability. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2024, 138, 109408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tognan, A.; Laurenti, L.; Salvati, E. Contour method with uncertainty quantification: A robust and optimised framework via gaussian process regression. Exp. Mech. 2022, 62, 1305–1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Selim, M.M.; Tounsi, A.; Gomaa, H.; Hu, N.; Shenashen, M. Addressing emerging contaminants in wastewater: Insights from adsorption isotherms and adsorbents: A comprehensive review. Alex. Eng. J. 2024, 100, 61–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aarab, N.; Hsini, A.; Essekri, A.; Laabd, M.; Lakhmiri, R.; Albourine, A. Removal of an emerging pharmaceutical pollutant (metronidazole) using PPY-PANi copolymer: Kinetics, equilibrium and DFT identification of adsorption mechanism. Groundw. Sustain. Dev. 2020, 11, 100416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nasseh, N.; Barikbin, B.; Taghavi, L.; Nasseri, M.A. Adsorption of metronidazole antibiotic using a new magnetic nanocomposite from simulated wastewater (isotherm, kinetic and thermodynamic studies). Compos. B Eng. 2019, 159, 146–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Inglis, A.; Parnell, A.; Hurley, C. Visualizing variable importance and variable interaction effects in machine learning models. J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 2022, 31, 766–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cross, M.C.; Newell, A.C. Convection patterns in large aspect ratio systems. Phys. D Nonlinear Phenom. 1984, 10, 299–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiu, H.; Li, Y.; Cheng, K.; Li, Y. A practical evaluation approach towards form deviation for two-dimensional contours based on coordinate measurement data. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 2000, 40, 259–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dritschel, D.G. Contour dynamics and contour surgery: Numerical algorithms for extended, high-resolution modelling of vortex dynamics in two-dimensional, inviscid, incompressible flows. Comput. Phys. Rep. 1989, 10, 77–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lehmann, R. Improved critical values for extreme normalized and studentized residuals in Gauss–Markov models. J. Geod. 2012, 86, 1137–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, L.; Gove, J.H.; Heath, L. Spatial residual analysis of six modeling techniques. Ecol. Modell. 2005, 186, 154–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jamrozik, J.; Strandén, I.; Schaeffer, L.R. Random regression test-day models with residuals following a Student’s-t distribution. J. Dairy Sci. 2004, 87, 699–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rigby, R.A.; Stasinopoulos, D.M. Generalized additive models for location, scale and shape. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. C Appl. Stat. 2005, 54, 507–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ishak, N.A.M.; Ahmad, S. Estimating optimal parameter of Box-Cox transformation in multiple regression with non-normal data. In Regional Conference on Science, Technology and Social Sciences (RCSTSS 2016) Theoretical and Applied Sciences; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; pp. 1039–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Atkinson, A.C.; Riani, M.; Corbellini, A. The box–cox transformation: Review and extensions. Stat. Sci. 2021, 36, 239–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marimuthu, S.; Mani, T.; Sudarsanam, T.D.; George, S.; Jeyaseelan, L. Preferring Box-Cox transformation, instead of log transformation to convert skewed distribution of outcomes to normal in medical research. Clin. Epidemiol. Glob. Health 2022, 15, 101043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miller, J.N. Basic statistical methods for analytical chemistry. Part 2. Calibration and regression methods. A review. Analyst 1991, 116, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hocking, R.R. Methods and Applications of Linear Models: Regression and the Analysis of Variance; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Bbumba, S.; Karume, I.; Talibawo, J.; Ntale, M.; Kaddu, G.; Yikii, C.L.; Kigozi, M. Insights into predictive modeling, isotherms and kinetic studies in the removal of methylene blue from water using pineapple Peel activated carbon. Discov. Water 2026, 6, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, Y.; Khaled, U.; Al-Rashed, A.A.A.A.; Meer, R.; Goodarzi, M.; Sarafraz, M.M. Potential application of Response Surface Methodology (RSM) for the prediction and optimization of thermal conductivity of aqueous CuO (II) nanofluid: A statistical approach and experimental validation. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Its Appl. 2020, 554, 124353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bbumba, S.; Karume, I.; Talibawo, J.; Kasozi, G.; Nyakairu, G.W.; Ntale, M.; Kaddu, G.; Kiganda, I.; Mbabazi, R.; Kigozi, M. Modeling of tetracycline removal from water using plastic waste-carbon nanomaterial: A study based on machine learning and mathematical models. Discov. Chem. Eng. 2026, 6, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kariim, I.; Abdulkareem, A.S.; Abubakre, O.K. Development and characterization of MWCNTs from activated carbon as adsorbent for metronidazole and levofloxacin sorption from pharmaceutical wastewater: Kinetics, isotherms and thermodynamic studies. Sci. Afr. 2020, 7, e00242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheikhmohammadi, A.; Asgari, E.; Yeganeh, J. Application of Fe3O4@activated carbon magnetic nanoparticles for the adsorption of metronidazole from wastewater: Optimization, kinetics, thermodynamics and equilibrium studies. Desalin. Water Treat. 2021, 222, 354–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El Farissi, H.; Beraich, A.; Lamsayah, M.; Talhaoui, A.; El Bachiri, A. The efficiency of carbon modified by phosphoric acid (H3PO4) used in the removal of two antibiotics amoxicillin and metronidazole from polluted water: Experimental and theoretical investigation. J. Mol. Liq. 2023, 391, 123237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schneider, L.T.; Módenes, A.N.; Scheufele, F.B.; Borba, C.E.; Trigueros, D.E.G.; Alves, H.J. Soybean hulls activated carbon for metronidazole adsorption: Thermochemical conditions optimization for tailored and enhanced meso/microporosity. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis. 2024, 177, 106339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kiguli, C.; Lubwama, M.; Turyasingura, M.; Jjagwe, J.; Olupot, P.W. Optimization of ciprofloxacin and metronidazole removal from wastewater using modified zeolite-iron oxide nanocomposites. Results Mater. 2026, 29, 100900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rasheed-Adeleke, A.A.; Oyewo, O.A.; Ogunjinmi, O.E.; Seheri, N.H.; Onwudiwe, D. The removal of tetracycline and metronidazole from water using zinc ferrite nanomaterials. Discov. Appl. Sci. 2026, 8, 669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]















| Parameter | Symbol | −1 | 0 | +1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dosage (g/L) | A | 0.5 | 1.0 | 1.5 | |
| Concentration (mg/L) | B | 10 | 25 | 40 | |
| Time (mins) | C | 1 | 5.5 | 10 | |
| pH | D | 3 | 7 | 11 | |
| EXPERIMENTAL RUNS | |||||
| Run | A: Dosage (g/L) | B: Concentration (mg/L) | C: Time (mins) | D: pH | Removal (%) |
| 1 | 1 | 10 | 5.5 | 11 | 97.11 |
| 2 | 1 | 40 | 5.5 | 11 | 28.99 |
| 3 | 1.5 | 25 | 1 | 7 | 98.13 |
| 4 | 1 | 25 | 1 | 11 | 98.89 |
| 5 | 1.5 | 25 | 10 | 7 | 48.99 |
| 6 | 0.5 | 25 | 10 | 7 | 20.22 |
| 7 | 0.5 | 25 | 5.5 | 11 | 39.9 |
| 8 | 1 | 25 | 5.5 | 7 | 70.11 |
| 9 | 1 | 25 | 5.5 | 7 | 68.99 |
| 10 | 1.5 | 25 | 5.5 | 11 | 75.65 |
| 11 | 1 | 25 | 5.5 | 7 | 71.77 |
| 12 | 1 | 40 | 10 | 7 | 21.22 |
| 13 | 1.5 | 40 | 5.5 | 7 | 60.12 |
| 14 | 1 | 25 | 5.5 | 7 | 72.44 |
| 15 | 1 | 10 | 5.5 | 3 | 32.56 |
| 16 | 1 | 10 | 10 | 7 | 43.66 |
| 17 | 1.5 | 10 | 5.5 | 7 | 90.92 |
| 18 | 0.5 | 40 | 5.5 | 7 | 20 |
| 19 | 1.5 | 25 | 5.5 | 3 | 36.78 |
| 20 | 1 | 40 | 1 | 7 | 63.32 |
| 21 | 1 | 25 | 10 | 11 | 49.11 |
| 22 | 0.5 | 10 | 5.5 | 7 | 43.78 |
| 23 | 0.5 | 25 | 5.5 | 3 | 20.45 |
| 24 | 1 | 40 | 5.5 | 3 | 60.77 |
| 25 | 0.5 | 25 | 1 | 7 | 35.22 |
| 26 | 1 | 25 | 10 | 3 | 33.51 |
| 27 | 1 | 25 | 1 | 3 | 35.12 |
| 28 | 1 | 10 | 1 | 7 | 97.66 |
| 29 | 1 | 25 | 5.5 | 7 | 70.91 |
| Entry | Function | Expressions |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sum squared errors (SSE) | |
| 2 | Sum of absolute error (SAE) | |
| 3 | Spearman’s correlation coefficient | |
| 4 | Mean squared error (MSE) | |
| 5 | Root mean square error (RMSE) | |
| 6 | Average relative error (ARE) |
| Parameter (s) | Value |
|---|---|
| BET surface area (m2/g) | 294.7 |
| Mean pore diameter (nm) | 2.6 |
| Total pore volume (cm3/g) | 0.17 |
| Langmuir surface area (m2/g) | 553.2 |
| Source | Sequential p-Value | Lack of Fit p-Value | Adjusted R2 | Predicted R2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linear | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | 0.6193 | 0.5207 | |
| 2FI | 0.0147 | 0.0002 | 0.7717 | 0.6582 | |
| Quadratic | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | 0.9037 | 0.7244 | Suggested |
| Cubic | 0.0111 | 0.0088 | 0.9802 | 0.4464 | Aliased |
| Source | Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square | F-Value | p-Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 17,672.55 | 14 | 1262.32 | 19.77 | <0.0001 | significant |
| A—Dosage | 4447.52 | 1 | 4447.52 | 69.67 | <0.0001 | |
| B—Concentration | 1906.88 | 1 | 1906.88 | 29.87 | <0.0001 | |
| C—Time | 3732.27 | 1 | 3732.27 | 58.47 | <0.0001 | |
| D—pH | 2421.38 | 1 | 2421.38 | 37.93 | <0.0001 | |
| AB | 12.32 | 1 | 12.32 | 0.1930 | 0.6671 | |
| AC | 291.38 | 1 | 291.38 | 4.56 | 0.0508 | |
| AD | 94.28 | 1 | 94.28 | 1.48 | 0.2444 | |
| BC | 35.40 | 1 | 35.40 | 0.5546 | 0.4688 | |
| BD | 2319.87 | 1 | 2319.87 | 36.34 | <0.0001 | |
| CD | 580.09 | 1 | 580.09 | 9.09 | 0.0093 | |
| A2 | 1239.23 | 1 | 1239.23 | 19.41 | 0.0006 | |
| B2 | 167.28 | 1 | 167.28 | 2.62 | 0.1278 | |
| C2 | 314.28 | 1 | 314.28 | 4.92 | 0.0435 | |
| D2 | 855.90 | 1 | 855.90 | 13.41 | 0.0026 | |
| Residual | 893.72 | 14 | 63.84 | |||
| Lack of Fit | 8.86 | 10 | 0.8863 | 0.4801 | 0.9383 | not significant |
| Pure Error | 7.39 | 4 | 1.85 | |||
| Cor Total | 18,566.27 | 28 |
| Metronidazole | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kinetics | Parameters | Error Functions | ||||||
| R2 | SAE | SSE | ARE | MSE | RMSE | |||
| PFO | Linear | qe = 1.4507 ± 0.02343 K1 = 0.0204 ± 0.00121 | 0.9959 | 4.21 | 0.089 | 3.45 | 0.0079 | 0.089 |
| Non-Linear | qe = 88.7539 ± 3.6312 K1 = 0.0534 ± 0.00352 | 0.9948 | 5.18 | 0.112 | 4.12 | 0.0125 | 0.112 | |
| PSO | Linear | qe = 5.0981 K2 = 0.4898–0.00214 | 0.9993 | 0.87 | 0.023 | 0.94 | 0.0005 | 0.023 |
| Non-Linear | qe = 233.2836 ± 3.5615 K2 = 0.0002363 ± 0.00001505 | 0.9989 | 1.94 | 0.051 | 1.56 | 0.0026 | 0.051 | |
| Metronidazole | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isotherm | Parameters | Error Functions | ||||||
| R2 | SAE | SSE | ARE | MSE | RMSE | |||
| Langmuir | Linear | qmax = 155.9164 ± 13.6682 KL = 0.000641 | 0.9929 | 7.5335 | 75.2890 | 15.3892 | 23.0838 | 11.5419 |
| Non-Linear | qmax = 218.5128 ± 7.8348 KL = 0.2668 ± 0.00441 | 0.9775 | 1.9179 | 4.6287 | 1.4088 | 35.2109 | 17.6098 | |
| Freundlich | Linear | n = 0.31138 ± 0.01367 Kf = 3.1749 ± 0.01367 | 0.9988 | 6.843 | 65.356 | 13.063 | 19.595 | 9.798 |
| Non-Linear | Kf = 72.4403 ± 4.2367 1/n = 0.2667 ± 0.01681 | 0.9825 | 0.0702 | 0.1454 | 0.0326 | 0.814 | 0.407 | |
| Entry | Parameter | Industrial Water | Filtered Water | WHO (2022) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | pH | 7.47 ± 0.022 | 6.63 ± 0.033 | 6.5–8.5 |
| 2 | Turbidity (NTU) | 4.214 ± 0.052 | 2.11 ± 0.014 | 0.5–5.0 |
| 3 | TDS (mg/L) | 841 ± 2.07 | 509 ± 0.699 | 1500 |
| Entry | Adsorbents | qmax (mg/g) | Conditions | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MWCNTs-ACs | 0.2 | pH 7, 25 | [69] |
| 2 | Fe3O4-AC | 95.1 | pH 7, 25 | [70] |
| 3 | H3PO4-AC | 769.2 | pH 7, 25 | [71] |
| 4 | Soybean hulls activated carbon | 51.3 | pH 7, 25 | [72] |
| 5 | Modified zeolite-iron oxide nanocomposites | 50.2 | pH 7, 25 | [73] |
| 6 | Zinc ferrite nanomaterials | 14.7 | pH 7, 25 | [74] |
| 7 | MC-AC | 72.4 | pH 7.5, 25 | This study |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Bbumba, S.; Kigozi, M.; Karume, I.; Talibawo, J.; Ntale, M.; Maganda, Y.W.; Ssemyalo, B.G.; Arwenyo, B.; Rodrigo, P.M. Application of Response Surface Methodology, Isotherms, and Kinetics in Metronidazole Removal from Water Using Highly Porous Maize Cob Activated Carbon. Environments 2026, 13, 393. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments13070393
Bbumba S, Kigozi M, Karume I, Talibawo J, Ntale M, Maganda YW, Ssemyalo BG, Arwenyo B, Rodrigo PM. Application of Response Surface Methodology, Isotherms, and Kinetics in Metronidazole Removal from Water Using Highly Porous Maize Cob Activated Carbon. Environments. 2026; 13(7):393. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments13070393
Chicago/Turabian StyleBbumba, Simon, Moses Kigozi, Ibrahim Karume, Joan Talibawo, Muhammad Ntale, Yasin Wandhami Maganda, Billy Garvin Ssemyalo, Beatrice Arwenyo, and Prashan M. Rodrigo. 2026. "Application of Response Surface Methodology, Isotherms, and Kinetics in Metronidazole Removal from Water Using Highly Porous Maize Cob Activated Carbon" Environments 13, no. 7: 393. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments13070393
APA StyleBbumba, S., Kigozi, M., Karume, I., Talibawo, J., Ntale, M., Maganda, Y. W., Ssemyalo, B. G., Arwenyo, B., & Rodrigo, P. M. (2026). Application of Response Surface Methodology, Isotherms, and Kinetics in Metronidazole Removal from Water Using Highly Porous Maize Cob Activated Carbon. Environments, 13(7), 393. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments13070393

