Synergistic Mechanisms in the Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans and thiooxidans Consortium: A Comprehensive Review
Abstract
1. Introduction: Chemoautotrophic and Heterotrophic Microorganisms
2. Taxonomy and Phylogenetic Analysis of the Genus Acidithiobacillus
3. Microorganisms in the Presence of Sulphides
3.1. Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans
3.2. Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans
4. The Consortium A. thiooxidans and A. ferrooxidans: An Alternative to Be Explored
5. The Bacterial Consortium and Biofilm Under Heavy Metal Stress
5.1. Interaction Between A. thiooxidans and A. ferrooxidans
5.2. Heavy Metals
- —
- Extracellular barrier (biosorption): Heavy metals are adsorbed at the cell surface or within extracellular polymeric substances (EPS). This mechanism operates as a physicochemical barrier, where negatively charged functional groups—such as carboxyl, hydroxyl, and phosphate moieties—interact with positively charged metal cations. As a result, metals (e.g., Pb2+, Cu2+) are immobilized at the cell surface, limiting their translocation across the cell membrane and preventing cytoplasmic toxicity [124].
- —
- Active transport (efflux systems): Bacteria employ membrane-associated transport systems, including efflux pumps, to actively export toxic metal ions from the cytoplasm to the extracellular environment. This energy-dependent process reduces intracellular metal concentrations and prevents the accumulation of toxic levels. Specialized transport proteins recognize and expel metal ions that have entered the cell, thereby maintaining cellular homeostasis.
- —
- Extracellular sequestration and precipitation: Microorganisms can release extracellular compounds, including proteins and phosphate-containing molecules, that bind or precipitate heavy metals in the surrounding environment. These interactions result in the formation of insoluble or less bioavailable metal complexes, thereby reducing metal uptake. In many cases, metals are converted into precipitated forms that are unable to interact with membrane transport systems [125].
- —
- Intracellular sequestration: Once internalized, heavy metals may be detoxified through binding to intracellular metal-chelating proteins, such as metallothioneins. These cysteine-rich proteins form stable complexes with metal ions (e.g., Cd2+, Cu2+), effectively sequestering them in an inert form and preventing interference with essential cellular processes, including DNA replication and protein synthesis [126].
- —
- Reduction and enzymatic transformation: Bacteria can enzymatically convert metal ions into less toxic or less bioavailable forms through redox reactions. This mechanism involves changes in oxidation state mediated by specific enzymes located in the cytoplasm or periplasm. For example, highly toxic hexavalent chromium (Cr6+) can be reduced to the less toxic trivalent form (Cr3+), which is typically less soluble and less mobile in the environment [127].
6. Application of the Consortium A. thiooxidans and A. ferrooxidans
6.1. Urban Biomining
6.2. Biological Sequestration of CO2
6.3. Applications in Nanotechnology and Consortia
6.4. Synthetic Multispecies Consortia
6.5. Remote Sensors and the Use of Encapsulated Consortium
6.6. The Life Cycle of Microbial Biomining
6.7. Treatment of Water Contaminated with Heavy Metals
7. Challenges and Limitations
8. Future Directions
9. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Dodd, M.S.; Papineau, D.; Grenne, T.; Slack, J.F.; Rittner, M.; Pirajno, F.; O’Neil, J.; Little, C.T. Evidence for early life in Earth’s oldest hydrothermal vent precipitates. Nature 2017, 543, 60–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kelly, D.P. Introduction to the chemolithotrophic bacteria. In The Prokaryotes: A Handbook on Habitats, Isolation, and Identification of Bacteria; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1981; pp. 997–1004. [Google Scholar]
- Irrgang, N.; Monneron-Enaud, B.; Möckel, R.; Schlömann, M.; Höck, M. Economic feasibility of the co-production of indium from zinc sulphide using bioleaching extraction in Germany. Hydrometallurgy 2021, 200, 105566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, X.J. Microbial ecology in the age of genomics and metagenomics: Concepts, tools, and recent advances. Mol. Ecol. 2006, 15, 1713–1731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moreno, J.R.; Gorriti, M.F.; Flores, M.R.; Albarracín, V.H. Microbiología Ambiental y Ecología Microbiana en el Estudio de Microorganismos en Ambientes Extremos. 2012. Available online: https://ri.conicet.gov.ar/handle/11336/17162 (accessed on 1 April 2026).
- Groudev, S. Use of heterotrophic microorganisms in mineral biotechnology. Eng. Life Sci. 1987, 7, 299–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sugio, T.; Domatsu, C.; Munakata, O.; Tano, T.; Imai, K. Role of a ferric ion-reducing system in sulfur oxidation of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1985, 49, 1401–1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cozma, P.; Bețianu, C.; Hlihor, R.-M.; Simion, I.M.; Gavrilescu, M. Bio-recovery of metals through biomining within circularity-based solutions. Processes 2024, 12, 1793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baker, B.J.; Banfield, J.F. Microbial communities in acid mine drainage. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2003, 44, 139–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, M.; Zeyad, M.T.; Choudhary, P.; Paul, S.; Chakdar, H.; Rajawat, M.V.S. Thiobacillus. In Beneficial Microbes in Agro-Ecology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 545–557. [Google Scholar]
- Gusenbauer, M.; Gauster, S.P. How to search for literature in systematic reviews and meta-analyses: A comprehensive step-by-step guide. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2025, 212, 123833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Williams, K.P.; Kelly, D.P. Proposal for a new class within the phylum Proteobacteria, Acidithiobacillia classis nov., with the type order Acidithiobacillales, and emended description of the class Gammaproteobacteria. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2013, 63, 2901–2906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hedrich, S.; Schlömann, M.; Johnson, D.B. The iron-oxidizing proteobacteria. Microbiology 2011, 157, 1551–1564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kelly, D.P.; Wood, A.P. Reclassification of some species of Thiobacillus to the newly designated genera Acidithiobacillus gen. nov., Halothiobacillus gen. nov. and Thermithiobacillus gen. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2000, 50, 511–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nuñez, H.; Moya-Beltrán, A.; Covarrubias, P.C.; Issotta, F.; Cárdenas, J.P.; González, M.; Atavales, J.; Acuña, L.G.; Johnson, D.B.; Quatrini, R. Molecular systematics of the genus Acidithiobacillus: Insights into the phylogenetic structure and diversification of the taxon. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.-T.; Liang, Z.-L.; Huang, Y.; Jiang, Z.; Yang, Z.-N.; Zhou, N.; Liu, Y.; Liu, S.-J.; Jiang, C.-Y. Acidithiobacillus acidisediminis sp. nov., an acidophilic sulphur-oxidizing chemolithotroph isolated from acid mine drainage sediment. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2024, 74, 005868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Negero, B.O. Comparative genome and protein analysis for Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans strains in terms of heavy metal binding as an application for biomining. Res. Sq. 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tamura, K.; Stecher, G.; Peterson, D.; Filipski, A.; Kumar, S. MEGA6: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 2725–2729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tonietti, L.; Esposito, M.; Cascone, M.; Barosa, B.; Fiscale, S.; Muscari Tomajoli, M.T.; Sbaffi, T.; Santomartino, R.; Covone, G.; Cordone, A.; et al. Unveiling the bioleaching versatility of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 2407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, R.; Lin, J.-Q.; Liu, X.-M.; Pang, X.; Zhang, C.-J.; Yang, C.-L.; Gao, X.-Y.; Lin, C.-M.; Li, Y.-Q.; Li, Y.; et al. Sulfur oxidation in the Acidophilic Autotrophic Acidithiobacillus spp. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 9, 3290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rekadwad, B.N.; Li, W.-J.; Gonzalez, J.M.; Punchappady Devasya, R.; Ananthapadmanabha Bhagwath, A.; Urana, R.; Parwez, K. Extremophiles: The species that evolve and survive under hostile conditions. 3 Biotech 2023, 13, 316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaksonen, A.H.; Petersen, J. The future of biomining: Towards sustainability in a metal-demanding world. In Biomining Technologies: Extracting and Recovering Metals from Ores and Wastes; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2022; pp. 295–314. [Google Scholar]
- Mandolini, E.; Probst, M.; Peintner, U. Methods for studying bacterial–fungal interactions in the microenvironments of soil. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 9182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vera, M.; Schippers, A.; Hedrich, S.; Sand, W. Progress in bioleaching: Fundamentals and mechanisms of microbial metal sulfide oxidation–Part A. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2022, 106, 6933–6952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Merino, N.; Aronson, H.S.; Bojanova, D.P.; Feyhl-Buska, J.; Wong, M.L.; Zhang, S.; Giovannelli, D. Living at the extremes: Extremophiles and the limits of life in a planetary context. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lipman, J.G.; Waksman, S.A.; Joffe, J.S. The oxidation of sulfur by soil microorganisms: I. Soil Sci. 1921, 12, 475–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Waksman, S.A.; Joffe, J. Microörganisms concerned in the oxidation of sulfur in the soil II. Thiobacillus thiooxidans, a new sulfur-oxidizing organism isolated from the soil. J. Bacteriol. 1922, 7, 239–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Waksman, S.A.; Starkey, R.L. On the growth and respiration of sulfur-oxidizing bacteria. J. Gen. Physiol. 1923, 5, 285–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Banerjee, I.; Burrell, B.; Reed, C.; West, A.C.; Banta, S. Metals and minerals as a biotechnology feedstock: Engineering biomining microbiology for bioenergy applications. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2017, 45, 144–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, S.; Li, H.; Ma, L.; Liu, R.; Li, Y.; Wang, H.; Lu, X.; Huang, X.; Wu, X.; Liu, X. Insertion sequence contributes to the evolution and environmental adaptation of Acidithiobacillus. BMC Genom. 2023, 24, 282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hansford, G.; Vargas, T. Chemical and electrochemical basis of bioleaching processes. Hydrometallurgy 2001, 59, 135–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Urbieta, M.S.; González Toril, E.; Aguilera, A.; Giaveno, M.A.; Donati, E. First prokaryotic biodiversity assessment using molecular techniques of an acidic river in Neuquén, Argentina. Microb. Ecol. 2012, 64, 91–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Natarajan, K. Microbial aspects of acid mine drainage and its bioremediation. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2008, 18, 1352–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamimura, K.; Higashino, E.; Moriya, S.; Sugio, T. Marine acidophilic sulfur-oxidizing bacterium requiring salts for the oxidation of reduced inorganic sulfur compounds. Extremophiles 2003, 7, 95–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jones, D.S.; Albrecht, H.L.; Dawson, K.S.; Schaperdoth, I.; Freeman, K.H.; Pi, Y.; Pearson, A.; Macalady, J.L. Community genomic analysis of an extremely acidophilic sulfur-oxidizing biofilm. ISME J. 2012, 6, 158–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Khan, S.; Haq, F.; Hasan, F.; Saeed, K.; Ullah, R. Growth and biochemical activities of Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans collected from black shale. J. Microbiol. Res. 2012, 2, 78–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quatrini, R.; Escudero, L.V.; Moya-Beltrán, A.; Galleguillos, P.A.; Issotta, F.; Acosta, M.; Cárdenas, J.P.; Nuñez, H.; Salinas, K.; Holmes, D.S.; et al. Draft genome sequence of Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans CLST isolated from the acidic hypersaline Gorbea salt flat in northern Chile. Stand. Genom. Sci. 2017, 12, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, L.; Zhao, D.; Yang, J.; Wang, W.; Chen, P.; Zhang, S.; Yan, L. Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans and its potential application. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 103, 7819–7833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Slowik, G.P.; Richer, R.; Stryjska, A.Z.; Dabrowski, P. Bacteria Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans, terrestrial analogue of extraterrestrial microorganisms? Int. J. Astrobiol. 2024, 23, e22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valdés, J.; Pedroso, I.; Quatrini, R.; Dodson, R.J.; Tettelin, H.; Blake, R.; Eisen, J.A.; Holmes, D.S. Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans metabolism: From genome sequence to industrial applications. BMC Genom. 2008, 9, 597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bramhachari, P.; Nagaraju, G.P. Extracellular polysaccharide production by bacteria as a mechanism of toxic heavy metal biosorption and biosequestration in the marine environment. In Marine Pollution and Microbial Remediation; Springer: Singapore, 2017; pp. 67–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rawlings, D.E. Characteristics and adaptability of iron-and sulfur-oxidizing microorganisms used for the recovery of metals from minerals and their concentrates. Microb. Cell Fact. 2005, 4, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silverman, M.P.; Lundgren, D.G. Studies on the chemoautotrophic iron bacterium Ferrobacillus ferrooxidans: I. An improved medium and a harvesting procedure for securing high cell yields. J. Bacteriol. 1959, 77, 642–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rowe, O.F.; Sánchez-España, J.; Hallberg, K.B.; Johnson, D.B. Microbial communities and geochemical dynamics in an extremely acidic, metal-rich stream at an abandoned sulfide mine (Huelva, Spain) underpinned by two functional primary production systems. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 9, 1761–1771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tapia, J.; Dueñas, A.; Cheje, N.; Soclle, G.; Patiño, N.; Ancalla, W.; Tenorio, S.; Denos, J.; Taco, H.; Cao, W.; et al. Bioleaching of heavy metals from printed circuit boards with an acidophilic iron-oxidizing microbial consortium in stirred tank reactors. Bioengineering 2022, 9, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jensen, A.B.; Webb, C. Ferrous sulphate oxidation using Thiobacillus ferrooxidans: A review. Process Biochem. 1995, 30, 225–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tuovinen, O.; Niemelä, S.; Gyllenberg, H. Tolerance of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans to some metals. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 1971, 37, 489–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bergey, D.H. Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Mostafavi, M.; Mirazimi, S.; Rashchi, F.; Faraji, F.; Mostoufi, N. Bioleaching and kinetic investigation of WPCBs by A. ferrooxidans, A. thiooxidans and their mixtures. J. Chem. Pet. Eng. 2018, 52, 81–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Willner, J.; Fornalczyk, A.; Saternus, M.; Sedlakova-Kadukova, J.; Gajda, B. LCD panels bioleaching with pure and mixed culture of Acidithiobacillus. Physicochem. Probl. Miner. Process. 2022, 58, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, Y.J.; Fray, D.J. Recovery of high purity precious metals from printed circuit boards. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 164, 1152–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Castillo-Cotrina, D.; Chipana-Laura, V.; Clavijo-Koc, C.; Castellanos-Cabrera, R. Cinética de crecimiento de consorcios microbianos acidófilos en cultivo sumergido para biolixiviantes. Ecol. Apl. 2024, 23, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Bai, J.; Xu, J.; Liang, B. Bioleaching of metals from printed wire boards by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans and Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans and their mixture. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 172, 1100–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johnson, D.B. Biomining—Biotechnologies for extracting and recovering metals from ores and waste materials. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2014, 30, 24–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adetunji, A.I.; Oberholster, P.J.; Erasmus, M. Bioleaching of Metals from E-Waste Using Microorganisms: A Review. Minerals 2023, 13, 828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, P.; Chang, F.; Yuan, D.; Wang, Y.; Fan, Y.; Kang, Y.; Zhou, L.; Yang, C.; Bi, W.; Qin, J.; et al. Biochar-induced alterations in Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans activity and its impact on Cd (II) and As (III) adsorption from acid mine drainage. Biochar 2024, 6, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, X.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, J.; Wu, X.; Luo, W.; Mu, G. Effect of biochar and Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans on heavy metal content in soil and lettuce. Soil Sediment Contam. Int. J. 2023, 32, 910–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Donlan, R.M.; Costerton, J.W. Biofilms: Survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2002, 15, 167–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Khan, Z.; Elahi, A.; Bukhari, D.A.; Rehman, A. Cadmium sources, toxicity, resistance and removal by microorganisms-A potential strategy for cadmium eradication. J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 2022, 26, 101569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.; Hassan, M.F.; Ali, W.; Zou, H.; Liu, Z.; Ma, Y. Effects of cadmium pollution on human health: A narrative review. Atmosphere 2025, 16, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Renu, K.; Chakraborty, R.; Myakala, H.; Koti, R.; Famurewa, A.C.; Madhyastha, H.; Vellingiri, B.; George, A.; Gopalakrishnan, A.V. Molecular mechanism of heavy metals (Lead, Chromium, Arsenic, Mercury, Nickel and Cadmium)-induced hepatotoxicity–A review. Chemosphere 2021, 271, 129735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, R.; Sang, P.; Guo, Y.; Jin, P.; Cheng, Y.; Yu, H.; Xie, Y.; Yao, W.; Qian, H. Cadmium in food: Source, distribution and removal. Food Chem. 2023, 405, 134666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flemming, H.-C.; van Hullebusch, E.D.; Neu, T.R.; Nielsen, P.H.; Seviour, T.; Stoodley, P.; Wingender, J.; Wuertz, S. The biofilm matrix: Multitasking in a shared space. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2023, 21, 70–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berne, C.; Ellison, C.K.; Ducret, A.; Brun, Y.V. Bacterial adhesion at the single-cell level. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2018, 16, 616–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, F.; Wang, S. Bioleaching of electronic waste using extreme acidophiles. In Electronic Waste Management and Treatment Technology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 153–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pal, M.K.; Lavanya, M. Microbial influenced corrosion: Understanding bioadhesion and biofilm formation. J. Bio- Tribo-Corros. 2022, 8, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramakrishnan, R.; Singh, A.K.; Singh, S.; Chakravortty, D.; Das, D. Enzymatic dispersion of biofilms: An emerging biocatalytic avenue to combat biofilm-mediated microbial infections. J. Biol. Chem. 2022, 298, 102352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarkar, A.; Bhattacharjee, S. Biofilm-mediated bioremediation of xenobiotics and heavy metals: A comprehensive review of microbial ecology, molecular mechanisms, and emerging biotechnological applications. 3 Biotech 2025, 15, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flemming, H.-C.; Wingender, J. The biofilm matrix. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010, 8, 623–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Yin, S.; Wu, A.; Chen, W. Synergetic bioleaching of copper sulfides using mixed microorganisms and its community structure succession. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 245, 118689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, S.; Zhang, R.; Wang, X.; Duan, J.; Etim, I.-I.N.; Mathivanan, K.; Wang, C. Harnessing bacterial power: Advanced strategies and genetic engineering insights for biocorrosion control and inhibition. npj Mater. Degrad. 2025, 9, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wilderer, P.; Characklis, W. Structure and Function of Biofilms; Wiley: Chichester, UK, 1989; 387p. [Google Scholar]
- Hernández-Caricio, C.; Ramírez, V.; Martínez, J.; Quintero-Hernández, V.; Baez, A.; Munive, J.-A.; Nora, R.-M. Los metales pesados en la historia de la humanidad, los efectos de la contaminación por metales pesados y los procesos biotecnológicos para su eliminación: El caso de Bacillus como bioherramienta para la recuperación de suelos. Alianzas Tend. BUAP 2022, 7, 1–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shah, S.B. Heavy metals in the marine environment—An overview. In Heavy Metals in Scleractinian Corals; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seraj, F.; Rahman, T. Heavy metals, metalloids, their toxic effect and living systems. Am. J. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 2626–2643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Inobeme, A. Effect of heavy metals on activities of soil microorganism. In Microbial Rejuvenation of Polluted Environment: Volume 3; Springer: Singapore, 2021; pp. 115–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alrashed, M.; Tabassum, H.; Almuhareb, N.; Almutlaq, N.; Alamro, W.; Alanazi, S.T.; Alenazi, F.K.; Alahmed, L.B.; Al Abudahash, M.M.; Alenzi, N.D. Assessment of DNA damage in relation to heavy metal induced oxidative stress in females with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 28, 5403–5407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, W.; Kim, D.; Back, S.; Lee, Y.-s.; Abari, A.H.; Kim, J. Removal of Ni2+ and Cd2+ by surface display of polyhistidine on Bacillus subtilis spore using CotE anchor protein. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 2019, 24, 375–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lemire, J.A.; Harrison, J.J.; Turner, R.J. Antimicrobial activity of metals: Mechanisms, molecular targets and applications. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2013, 11, 371–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bellenberg, S.; Barthen, R.; Boretska, M.; Zhang, R.; Sand, W.; Vera, M. Manipulation of pyrite colonization and leaching by iron-oxidizing Acidithiobacillus species. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 99, 1435–1449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mateos, L.M.; Villadangos, A.F.; De la Rubia, A.G.; Mourenza, A.; Marcos-Pascual, L.; Letek, M.; Pedre, B.; Messens, J.; Gil, J.A. The arsenic detoxification system in corynebacteria: Basis and application for bioremediation and redox control. In Advances in Applied Microbiology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; Volume 99, pp. 103–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, R.; Liu, S.; Bai, X.; Liu, S.; Liu, Y. Biooxidation of arsenopyrite by Acidithiobacillus ferriphilus QBS 3 exhibits arsenic resistance under extremely acidic bioleaching conditions. Biology 2025, 14, 550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, X.; Hu, Y.; Yue, Y.; Ding, Y.; Cao, B.; Shi, L.; Liu, J. Biofilm engineering through c-di-GMP tuning boosts bioleaching efficiency and arsenic tolerance in Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2026, 92, e02288-25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klock, J.-H.; Wieland, A.; Seifert, R.; Michaelis, W. Extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) from cyanobacterial mats: Characterisation and isolation method optimisation. Mar. Biol. 2007, 152, 1077–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hossain, S.T.; Mallick, I.; Mukherjee, S.K. Cadmium toxicity in Escherichia coli: Cell morphology, Z-ring formation and intracellular oxidative balance. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2012, 86, 54–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nnaji, N.D.; Anyanwu, C.U.; Miri, T.; Onyeaka, H. Mechanisms of heavy metal tolerance in bacteria: A review. Sustainability 2024, 16, 11124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barik, A.; Biswal, D.; Arun, A.; Balasubramanian, V. Biodetoxification of heavy metals using biofilm bacteria. In Environmental and Agricultural Microbiology: Applications for Sustainability; Wiley Scriver: Beverly, MA, USA, 2021; pp. 39–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; She, S.; Dong, W.; Niu, J.; Xiao, Y.; Liang, Y.; Liu, X.; Zhang, X.; Fan, F.; Yin, H. Comparative genomics unravels metabolic differences at the species and/or strain level and extremely acidic environmental adaptation of ten bacteria belonging to the genus Acidithiobacillus. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2016, 39, 493–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, S.-Y.; Wu, J.-Q.; Sung, S. Effects of sulfur dosage on continuous bioleaching of heavy metals from contaminated sediment. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 424, 127257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karthik, C.; Barathi, S.; Pugazhendhi, A.; Ramkumar, V.; Thi, N.B.D.; Arulselvi, P. Evaluation of Cr (VI) reduction mechanism and removal by Cellulosimicrobium funkei strain AR8, a novel haloalkaliphilic bacterium. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017, 333, 42–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mohapatra, R.K.; Pandey, S.; Thatoi, H.; Panda, C.R. Reduction of chromium (VI) by marine bacterium Brevibacillus laterosporus under varying saline and pH conditions. Environ. Eng. Sci. 2017, 34, 617–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahemad, M. Bacterial mechanisms for Cr (VI) resistance and reduction: An overview and recent advances. Folia Microbiol. 2014, 59, 321–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Johnson, D.B.; Hedrich, S.; Pakostova, E. Indirect redox transformations of iron, copper, and chromium catalyzed by extremely acidophilic bacteria. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, L.; Liu, Z.; Meng, D.; Liu, X.; Li, X.; Zhang, M.; Tao, J.; Gu, Y.; Zhong, S.; Yin, H. Comparative genomic analysis reveals the distribution, organization, and evolution of metal resistance genes in the genus Acidithiobacillus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2019, 85, e02153-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wyszkowska, J.; Borowik, A.; Kucharski, M.a.; Kucharski, J. Effect of cadmium, copper and zinc on plants, soil microorganisms and soil enzymes. J. Elem. 2013, 18, 769–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, J.; Qiu, H.; Tan, D.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, Y. DNA N6-methyladenine modifications of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans response to copper stress. PLoS ONE 2025, 20, e0337584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Almárcegui, R.J.; Navarro, C.A.; Paradela, A.; Albar, J.P.; von Bernath, D.; Jerez, C.A. New copper resistance determinants in the extremophile Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans: A quantitative proteomic analysis. J. Proteome Res. 2014, 13, 946–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vargas-Straube, M.J.; Beard, S.; Norambuena, R.; Paradela, A.; Vera, M.; Jerez, C.A. High copper concentration reduces biofilm formation in Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans by decreasing production of extracellular polymeric substances and its adherence to elemental sulfur. J. Proteom. 2020, 225, 103874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Orell, A.; Navarro, C.A.; Arancibia, R.; Mobarec, J.C.; Jerez, C.A. Life in blue: Copper resistance mechanisms of bacteria and archaea used in industrial biomining of minerals. Biotechnol. Adv. 2010, 28, 839–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Giovanella, P.; Cabral, L.; Bento, F.M.; Gianello, C.; Camargo, F.A.O. Mercury (II) removal by resistant bacterial isolates and mercuric (II) reductase activity in a new strain of Pseudomonas sp. B50A. New Biotechnol. 2016, 33, 216–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Gu, C.; Liu, H.; Zhou, Y.; Nie, Z.; Wang, Y.; Chen, L.; Xia, J. Fe/S redox-coupled Mercury transformation mediated by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans ATCC 23270 under aerobic and/or Anaerobic conditions. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Godoi Pereira, M.; Freitas, D.C.; de Souza Neta, L.C.; dos Santos, A.V.; Ribeiro, J.N.; Ribeiro, A.V.F.N. Sulfur, Aluminum, Arsenic, Cadmium, Lead, Mercury, and Nickel in Marine Ecosystems: Accumulation, Distribution, and Environmental Effects. In Marine Pollution: Current Status, Impacts, and Remedies; Bentham Science Publishers: Sharjah, United Arab Emirates, 2019; Volume 1, pp. 68–90. [Google Scholar]
- Gao, X.-Y.; Liu, X.-J.; Fu, C.-A.; Gu, X.-F.; Lin, J.-Q.; Liu, X.-M.; Pang, X.; Lin, J.-Q.; Chen, L.-X. Novel strategy for improvement of the bioleaching efficiency of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans based on the AfeI/R quorum sensing system. Minerals 2020, 10, 222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, H.; Singh, R.D.; Tiwari, R.; Gangopadhyay, S.; Roy, S.K.; Singh, D.; Srivastava, V. Mercury exposure induces cytoskeleton disruption and loss of renal function through epigenetic modulation of MMP9 expression. Toxicology 2017, 386, 28–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jan, R.; Khan, M.A.; Asaf, S.; Lubna; Lee, I.-J.; Kim, K.M. Metal resistant endophytic bacteria reduces cadmium, nickel toxicity, and enhances expression of metal stress related genes with improved growth of Oryza sativa, via regulating its antioxidant machinery and endogenous hormones. Plants 2019, 8, 363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Macomber, L.; Hausinger, R.P. Mechanisms of nickel toxicity in microorganisms. Metallomics 2011, 3, 1153–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mulrooney, S.B.; Hausinger, R.P. Nickel uptake and utilization by microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2003, 27, 239–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Syed, A.; Zeyad, M.T.; Mohammad, S.; Elgorban, A.M.; Alkhulaifi, M.M.; Ansari, I.A. Heavy metals induced modulations in growth, physiology, cellular viability, and biofilm formation of an identified bacterial isolate. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 25076–25088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simons, T. The role of anion transport in the passive movement of lead across the human red cell membrane. J. Physiol. 1986, 378, 287–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suwalsky, M.; Villena, F.; Norris, B.; Cuevas, Y.; Sotomayor, C.; Zatta, P. Effects of lead on the human erythrocyte membrane and molecular models. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2003, 97, 308–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.-W.; Cao, A.; Jiang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Liu, J.-H.; Liu, Y.; Wang, H. Superior antibacterial activity of zinc oxide/graphene oxide composites originating from high zinc concentration localized around bacteria. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 2791–2798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vallee, B.; Falchuk, K. Zinc and gene expression. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 1981, 294, 185–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prasad, A.S. Zinc and gene expression. In Biochemistry of Zinc; Biochemistry of the Elements; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 1993; Volume 11, pp. 55–76. [Google Scholar]
- Harrison, J.J.; Ceri, H.; Turner, R.J. Multimetal resistance and tolerance in microbial biofilms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2007, 5, 928–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gadd, G.M. Microbial influence on metal mobility and application for bioremediation. Geoderma 2004, 122, 109–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silver, S.; Phung, L.T. A bacterial view of the periodic table: Genes and proteins for toxic inorganic ions. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2005, 32, 587–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lehninger, A. Role of metal ions in enzyme systems. Physiol. Rev. 1950, 30, 393–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhaskar, P.; Bhosle, N.B. Bacterial extracellular polymeric substance (EPS): A carrier of heavy metals in the marine food-chain. Environ. Int. 2006, 32, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, H.; Fang, H.H. Characterization of electrostatic binding sites of extracellular polymers by linear programming analysis of titration data. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2002, 80, 806–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De, J.; Ramaiah, N.; Vardanyan, L. Detoxification of toxic heavy metals by marine bacteria highly resistant to mercury. Mar. Biotechnol. 2008, 10, 471–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ohtake, H.; Fujii, E.; Toda, K. Reduction of toxic chromate in an industrial effluent by use of a chromate-reducing strain of Enterobacter cloacae. Environ. Technol. 1990, 11, 663–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rohwerder, T.; Gehrke, T.; Kinzler, K.; Sand, W. Bioleaching review part A: Progress in bioleaching: Fundamentals and mechanisms of bacterial metal sulfide oxidation. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2003, 63, 239–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ramírez-Aldaba, H.; Valles, O.P.; Vazquez-Arenas, J.; Rojas-Contreras, J.A.; Valdez-Pérez, D.; Ruiz-Baca, E.; Meraz-Rodríguez, M.; Sosa-Rodríguez, F.S.; Rodríguez, Á.G.; Lara, R.H. Chemical and surface analysis during evolution of arsenopyrite oxidation by Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans in the presence and absence of supplementary arsenic. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 566, 1106–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, A.; Vaishnav, A.; Jamali, H.; Srivastava, A.K.; Saxena, A.K.; Srivastava, A.K. Halophilic bacteria: Potential bioinoculants for sustainable agriculture and environment management under salt stress. In Plant-Microbe Interaction: An Approach to Sustainable Agriculture; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; pp. 297–325. [Google Scholar]
- Kaushik, S.; Alatawi, A.; Djiwanti, S.R.; Pande, A.; Skotti, E.; Soni, V. Potential of extremophiles for bioremediation. In Microbial Rejuvenation of Polluted Environment: Volume 1; Springer: Singapore, 2021; pp. 293–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iyer, A.; Mody, K.; Jha, B. Accumulation of hexavalent chromium by an exopolysaccharide producing marine Enterobacter cloaceae. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2004, 49, 974–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, W.; Chen, L.; Liu, D. Characterization of a marine-isolated mercury-resistant Pseudomonas putida strain SP1 and its potential application in marine mercury reduction. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 93, 1305–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Poirier, I.; Hammann, P.; Kuhn, L.; Bertrand, M. Strategies developed by the marine bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens BA3SM1 to resist metals: A proteome analysis. Aquat. Toxicol. 2013, 128, 215–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, Q.; Wang, C.; Li, B.; Sun, C.; Deng, F.; Song, C.; Wang, S. Isolation of Thiobacillus spp. and its application in the removal of heavy metals from activated sludge. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2012, 11, 16336–16341. [Google Scholar]
- Pathak, A.; Dastidar, M.; Sreekrishnan, T. Bioleaching of heavy metals from sewage sludge by indigenous iron-oxidizing microorganisms using ammonium ferrous sulfate and ferrous sulfate as energy sources: A comparative study. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 171, 273–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ko, M.-S.; Park, H.-S.; Kim, K.-W.; Lee, J.-U. The role of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans and Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans in arsenic bioleaching from soil. Environ. Geochem. Health 2013, 35, 727–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mandl, M.M.; Lerchbammer, R.; Gerold, E. Bioleaching of lithium-ion battery black mass: A comparative study on Gluconobacter oxydans and Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans. Metals 2025, 15, 1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Showalter, A.R.; Szymanowski, J.E.; Fein, J.B.; Bunker, B.A. An x-ray absorption spectroscopy study of Cd binding onto a halophilic archaeon. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2016, 712, 012079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naik, S.; Furtado, I. Equilibrium and kinetics of adsorption of Mn2+ by haloarchaeon Halobacterium sp. GUSF (MTCC3265). Geomicrobiol. J. 2014, 31, 708–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heydarian, A.; Mousavi, S.M.; Vakilchap, F.; Baniasadi, M. Application of a mixed culture of adapted acidophilic bacteria in two-step bioleaching of spent lithium-ion laptop batteries. J. Power Sources 2018, 378, 19–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naseri, T.; Mousavi, S.M. Improvement of Li and Mn bioleaching from spent lithium-ion batteries, using step-wise addition of biogenic sulfuric acid by Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans. Heliyon 2024, 10, e37447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cheng, J.; Lu, T.; Huang, S.; Li, G.; Wang, J.; Kong, F.; Cheng, Q.; Zhang, Y. Recovery of cobalt from spent lithium-ion batteries as the dopant of TiO2 photocatalysts for boosting ciprofloxacin degradation. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 316, 128279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, S.; Shen, Y. Urban Biomining of Rare Earth Elements: Current Status and Future Opportunities. ACS Environ. Au 2025, 6, 46–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Temple, K.L.; Colmer, A.R. The autotrophic oxidation of iron by a new bacterium: Thiobacillus ferrooxidans. J. Bacteriol. 1951, 62, 605–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dopson, M.; Okibe, N. Biomining microorganisms: Diversity and modus operandi. In Biomining Technologies: Extracting and Recovering Metals from Ores and Wastes; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2022; pp. 89–110. [Google Scholar]
- Nguyen, T.H.; Won, S.; Ha, M.-G.; Nguyen, D.D.; Kang, H.Y. Bioleaching for environmental remediation of toxic metals and metalloids: A review on soils, sediments, and mine tailings. Chemosphere 2021, 282, 131108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mistry, A.N.; Ganta, U.; Chakrabarty, J.; Dutta, S. A review on biological systems for CO2 sequestration: Organisms and their pathways. Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy 2019, 38, 127–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- La, Y.H.; Lee, K.-S.; Kim, T.-W.; Song, J.Y. A bacteria-based carbon sequestration and waste recycling system. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 10236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iravani, S. Bacteria in nanoparticle synthesis: Current status and future prospects. Int. Sch. Res. Not. 2014, 2014, 359316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ulloa, G.; Collao, B.; Araneda, M.; Escobar, B.; Álvarez, S.; Bravo, D.; Pérez-Donoso, J. Use of acidophilic bacteria of the genus Acidithiobacillus to biosynthesize CdS fluorescent nanoparticles (quantum dots) with high tolerance to acidic pH. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2016, 95, 217–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Anik, M.A.; Rahman, A.; Hoque, M.I.; Wasi, A.T.; Shafikul Islam, M.; Ahsan, M.M.; Bappy, M.M. Biotwinmine: Digital Twin-Based Optimization of Biomining for Sustainable Rare Earth Element Production. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5258720 (accessed on 1 April 2026).
- Corami, A. Sustainable Remediation Methods for Mining Wastes. In Sustainable Management of Mining Waste and Tailings; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2024; pp. 254–288. [Google Scholar]
- Tang, D.; Xi, Y.; Song, W.; Li, M.; Liu, Y.; Lin, Y.; Zhang, R.; Mao, A. Design and synthesis of quorum-sensing agonist for improving biofilm formation and the application of Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans in bioleaching. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1465633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, Z.; Yan, W.; Ding, M.; Yuan, Y. Construction of microbial consortia for microbial degradation of complex compounds. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022, 10, 1051233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Watzel, R. Minerals for future technologies: How Germany copes with challenges. Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ. 2023, 526, 13–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wołowiec, M.; Komorowska-Kaufman, M.; Pruss, A.; Rzepa, G.; Bajda, T. Removal of heavy metals and metalloids from water using drinking water treatment residuals as adsorbents: A review. Minerals 2019, 9, 487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baby, R.; Hussein, M.Z.; Abdullah, A.H.; Zainal, Z. Nanomaterials for the treatment of heavy metal contaminated water. Polymers 2022, 14, 583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vera, M.; Schippers, A.; Sand, W. Progress in bioleaching: Fundamentals and mechanisms of bacterial metal sulfide oxidation—Part A. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97, 7529–7541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rawlings, D.E.; Johnson, D.B. The microbiology of biomining: Development and optimization of mineral-oxidizing microbial consortia. Microbiology 2007, 153, 315–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Watling, H.R. Review of biohydrometallurgical metals extraction from polymetallic mineral resources. Minerals 2014, 5, 1–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brune, K.D.; Bayer, T.S. Engineering microbial consortia to enhance biomining and bioremediation. Front. Microbiol. 2012, 3, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]




| Microorganisms | Growth by Oxidation of | Source C | Temperature | Acidity | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fe2+ | S2− | S° | CO2 | Temp °C | pH | |
| Bacteria | ||||||
| Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans | + | + | + | + | 20 to 35 | 1.5 to 2.5 |
| Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans | − | − | + | + | 20 to 35 | 1.5 to 2.5 |
| Leptospirillum ferrooxidans | + | − | − | + | 30 | 1.2 to 2.0 |
| Sulfobacillus thermotolerans | + | + | − | + | 45 to 60 | 3.0 |
| Archaea | ||||||
| Acidianus brierleyi | + | + | + | + | 45 to 75 | 0.0 to 1.0 |
| Metallosphaera sedula | + | + | + | + | 50 to 80 | 0.0 to 1.0 |
| Sulfolobus acidocaldarius | + | + | − | + | 60 to 80 | 3.0 |
| Acidianus archae | + | + | + | + | 60 to 80 | 3.0 |
| Metallosphaera archaea | + | + | + | + | 60 to 80 | 2.5 |
| Fungi | ||||||
| Aspergillus niger | − | − | − | 10 to 45 | 2.0 to 3.5 | |
| Penicillium simplicissimum | − | − | − | 5 to 35 | 2.0 to 3.5 | |
| Natural Distribution | Reference |
|---|---|
| Hot springs, lakes, and volcanic craters | [33] |
| Acid mine drainage | [34] |
| Seawater | [35] |
| Caves and sulphide shales | [36,37] |
| Sewer pipes, uranium, coal, and copper mines | [38] |
| 9K Medium A. ferrooxidans | 9Km Medium A. thiooxidans | Consortia Mixed Medium. Media for A. ferrooxidans and A. thiooxidans Culture Mix | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reagents | Quantity (g/L) | Reagents | Quantity (g/L) | Reagents | Quantity (g/L) |
| (NH4)2SO4 | 3 | (NH4)2SO4 | 0.4 | (NH4)2SO4 | 4 |
| KCl | 0.1 | KCl | 0.25 | KCl | 0.10 |
| K2HPO4 | 0.5 | K2HPO4 | 3 | K2HPO4 | 0.5 |
| MgSO4·7H2O | 0.5 | MgSO4·7H2O | 0.5 | MgSO4·7H2O | 0.5 |
| Ca (NO3)2 | 0.01 | FeSO4·7H2O | 0.01 | CaCl2 | 0.13 |
| FeSO4·7H2O | 14 | Ca (NO3)2 | 0.01 | ||
| FeSO4·7H2O | 14 | ||||
| (NH4)2SO4 | 4 | ||||
| Heavy Metal | Effects on Bacteria | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Arsenic (As) | Enzyme deactivation/induction of oxidative stress Increased production of exopolysaccharides as a resistance mechanism | [89,90,91,92,93] |
| Cadmium (Cd) | Damage to proteins and nucleic acids prevents cell division and transcription Oxidative damage to biomolecules, such as proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids | [94,95,96,97,98] |
| Chromium (Cr) | Inhibits microbial growth and activity/elongation of the latency phase, oxidative stress | [99,100,101,102,103] |
| Copper (Cu) | Inhibition of enzymatic activities, inhibition of cell division | [104,105,106,107,108] |
| Mercury (Hg) | Causes cell rupture, antimicrobial effects, and disruption of membrane integrity Changes in the composition and structure of the cell matrix | [109,110,111,112,113] |
| Nickel (Ni) | Enzyme inhibition and membrane disruption | [114,115,116,117,118] |
| Lead (Pb) | Disruption of cellular respiration inhibits growth in high concentrations | [119] |
| Zinc (Zn) | Modification of cell membrane integrity/inhibition of protein synthesis Modification of gene expression associated with vital cellular functions | [120,121,122] |
| Bacteria | Metals Removed | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Marinobacter spp. | Pb2+, Cu2+ | [128] |
| Pseudomonas aeruginosa | Pb2+ | [130] |
| Enterobacter cloacae | Cr (VI), Cd2+ | [136] |
| Pseudomonas putida | Hg | [137] |
| Pseudomonas fluorescens | Cd2+, Cu2+, Zn2+ | [138] |
| Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans-Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans | Fe2+, SOx, S°, As(V) Cu2+, Zn2+, Fe2+, Al, Li, Cd2+ | [139] |
| Halobacterium noricense Halobacterium spp. | Cd2+ Mn2+ | [140] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Ramírez-Aldaba, H.; Ruiz-Baca, E.; Escobedo-Bretado, M.Á.; García-Montiel, E.; Adame-Soto, P.J.; Lara, R.H. Synergistic Mechanisms in the Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans and thiooxidans Consortium: A Comprehensive Review. Environments 2026, 13, 216. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments13040216
Ramírez-Aldaba H, Ruiz-Baca E, Escobedo-Bretado MÁ, García-Montiel E, Adame-Soto PJ, Lara RH. Synergistic Mechanisms in the Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans and thiooxidans Consortium: A Comprehensive Review. Environments. 2026; 13(4):216. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments13040216
Chicago/Turabian StyleRamírez-Aldaba, Hugo, Estela Ruiz-Baca, Miguel Ángel Escobedo-Bretado, Emily García-Montiel, Pablo Jaciel Adame-Soto, and René H. Lara. 2026. "Synergistic Mechanisms in the Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans and thiooxidans Consortium: A Comprehensive Review" Environments 13, no. 4: 216. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments13040216
APA StyleRamírez-Aldaba, H., Ruiz-Baca, E., Escobedo-Bretado, M. Á., García-Montiel, E., Adame-Soto, P. J., & Lara, R. H. (2026). Synergistic Mechanisms in the Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans and thiooxidans Consortium: A Comprehensive Review. Environments, 13(4), 216. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments13040216

