A Crisscrossing Competency Framework for Family–Preschool Partnerships: Perspectives from Chinese Kindergarten Teachers
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Theoretical Background and Literature Review
2.1. Theoretical Background
2.1.1. Competency Theory
2.1.2. The Overlapping Spheres of Influence
2.2. Literature Review
- (1)
- Objective 1: To analyze the significant differences in competencies between outstanding and typical preschool teachers in family preschool partnership work.
- (2)
- Objective 2: To identify notable differences in competencies between early and late career stages in family preschool partnership work, exploring how these competencies evolve and develop with experience.
- (3)
- Objective 3: To develop a sustainable crisscrossing FPPC framework (a dual-axis design that categorizes competencies along two dimensions: the horizontal axis distinguishes between high-performance and general traits, while the vertical axis classifies these traits by their degree of variability). This framework aims to better support preschool teachers’ development and retention.
3. Methods and Materials
3.1. Methods
Behavioral Event Interview
3.2. Samples
3.3. Interview Procedure
3.4. Competency Coding
3.5. Data Analysis
4. Results
4.1. Coding Reliability
4.2. Finding
- Quadrant I: High-Performance, Variable Traits
Through years of experience, I have come to understand the importance of effective relationship management. In our classroom, communication between the three teachers is vital. For instance, if an incident occurs, such as a child falling, my co-teacher and caregiver will immediately inform me. I always prioritize discussing such incidents with the child’s mother first. If I’m unaware of the situation when parents inquire, they may feel that the teachers are neglecting their child. That’s why communication and cooperation among teachers are essential. We also remind each other of various tasks to ensure nothing is forgotten. By maintaining a consistent approach when communicating with parents, we can take the initiative in these discussions.
Currently, the communication of daily teaching tasks and the feedback provided in kindergartens account for only about one-fifth of the overall efforts dedicated to family–preschool partnerships, far less than half. In fact, the implementation of these partnerships spans the entire educational journey, beginning when a child enters kindergarten and continuing until they leave.
Regardless of the form of home-school collaboration, it is a continuous process; it isn’t fragmented. It can extend from the lower grades all the way to the upper grades and even into elementary school. Communication with parents can persist throughout this journey. Therefore, at times, home-school collaboration requires patience. We need to allow ourselves time, give the children time, and also grant the parents time.
- Quadrant II: High-Performance, Stable Traits
Self-confidence and emotional stability have consistently characterized my approach to professional interactions. Even during initial communications with parents, I rarely experienced apprehension, consistently maintaining composure. Emotional stability is a critical attribute, particularly for educators; colleagues who are easily affected by parental interactions often exhibit broader emotional instability in their daily practice.
When you genuinely care for a parent’s child, with true devotion and a commitment to guiding and accompanying the child at every stage in kindergarten, you foster a sense of love and respect that both the child and the parent can feel, leading to a positive perception of the teacher.
When dealing with parents, it’s essential for teachers to remain calm and communicate effectively; instead of reacting out of anger or frustration, I take the time to adjust my mindset and approach situations positively, even when I’m particularly upset.(Lv, 2025)
- Quadrant III: General, Variable Traits
Sometimes, for example, when issues arise in your classroom while you’re working, you should proactively reach out to parents to resolve these problems. This is a primary premise of our role as educators today.
- Quadrant IV: General, Stable Traits
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
7. Limitations and Future Research
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
FPPs | Family–Preschool Partnerships |
FPPC | Family–Preschool Partnership Competency |
SJTs | Situational Judgment Tests |
Appendix A
Competency Traits | Competency Traits | Competency Traits |
---|---|---|
Child Orientation | Communication and Expression | Care and Respect |
Family Education | Empathic Perspective-Taking Skill | Proactivity |
Guidance and Service | Reflective Ability | Information Gathering |
Organization and Coordination | Lifelong Learning | Confidence |
Analysis and Diagnosis | Sense of Responsibility | Flexibility and Adaptability |
Competencies | Definition | Scaled Indicators |
---|---|---|
Proactivity | Refers to the ability of an individual to take initiative, act beyond the limitations of their current environment, and actively set and pursue personal goals. In the context of early childhood teachers, this involves the tendency to actively identify educational opportunities and take action to promote children’s learning and development. | When defining the 7 levels of the “Preschool Teacher Home-School Co-Education Competency Coding Dictionary”, Bloom’s taxonomy serves as a valuable framework for categorizing competencies. The levels are defined as follows: Level 0—Unfamiliar with the concept or unable to demonstrate the competency. Level 1—Knowledge Level: Recalls basic facts or concepts related to the competency. Level 2—Comprehension Level: Understands the meaning of the competency and can explain it. Level 3—Application Level: Applies the competency in a practical context. Level 4— Analysis Level: Breaks down the competency into parts and understands the relationships among them. Level 5—Synthesis Level: Combines elements to form a new whole or creates new approaches. Level 6—Evaluation Level: Makes judgments based on criteria and standards related to the competency. |
Child Orientation | An educational approach centered on the needs, interests, and perspectives of children. This requires teachers to adjust their teaching strategies from the children’s point of view to meet their individual differences and learning needs. | |
Recognition of Importance | Teachers’ recognition of the significance of their educational role, including awareness of the critical periods in children’s development and a profound understanding of the far-reaching impact of education on children’s future. | |
Responsible Follow-Up | The attitude of teachers being responsible for their educational practices and children’s learning outcomes. This includes self-monitoring and evaluation of educational quality, as well as actively addressing issues and challenges that arise in the educational process. | |
Confidence | The self-assurance of teachers in teaching and interaction, which helps to establish teacher authority, facilitate effective teaching, and set a positive example for children. | |
Knowledge of Children’s Physical and Mental Development | An in-depth understanding of the various stages of children’s physical and mental development, including cognitive, emotional, social, and physiological growth. | |
Basic Care and Education Knowledge | Involves fundamental theoretical and practical knowledge of early childhood education and care, providing teachers with necessary theoretical support and practical guidance. | |
Knowledge of Family Education | Comprehends the importance and influence of family education and how to collaborate with parents to jointly promote the comprehensive development of children. | |
Communication and Expression | The ability of teachers to communicate effectively with children, parents, and colleagues, including clearly expressing thoughts, feelings, and information, as well as listening to and understanding the perspectives of others. | |
Guidance and Cooperation | The capacity to provide guidance and support in the educational process and to establish cooperative relationships with children, parents, and other education professionals. | |
Relationship Management | The ability to establish and maintain positive, supportive relationships with children, parents, and other education professionals. | |
Analytical and Diagnostic Skills | The capability to assess and interpret children’s learning needs and behavioral performance, and to develop educational intervention and support strategies based on this information. | |
Empathic Perspective-Taking Skill | The capacity to understand and empathize with children’s feelings and experiences, and to view issues from the children’s perspective. | |
Observation and Understanding | The ability to collect information about children’s behavior and learning processes through observation, and to analyze and interpret this information. | |
Planning and Organization | The capability to develop and implement educational activities and curriculum plans, including time management, resource coordination, and activity organization. | |
Reflective Learning | The ability to reflect on educational practices, learn from them, and improve teaching strategies. | |
Positive Attribution | The tendency to attribute success and positive outcomes to personal effort and ability, which helps maintain a positive educational attitude and motivation. | |
Achievement Motivation | The drive to pursue excellence and success, which motivates teachers to continuously improve their educational practices to achieve higher educational standards. | |
Differentiated Teaching Ability | The ability to adjust teaching methods and content according to the different needs and capabilities of children. | |
Emotional Regulation | The capacity to manage personal emotions and create and maintain a positive educational environment. |
References
- Aarnon, S., & Reichel, N. (2007). Who is the ideal teacher? Similarities and differences in perception of students of education regarding the qualities of a good teacher and of their own qualities as teachers. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 13(5), 441–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adams, K. S., & Christenson, S. L. (2000). Trust and the family–school relationship examination of parent–teacher differences in elementary and secondary grades. Journal of School Psychology, 38(5), 477–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barnard, M., Dehon, E., Caroline, C., Notebaert, A., Wesley, S., Meyer, E., & Rockhold, R. (2020). Development of a competency model and tailored assessment method for high school science teachers utilizing a flipped learning approach. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(5), 2595–2614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ben-Tov, S., & Romi, S. (2019). Parents’ involvement, identification and alertness, and their children’s functioning in school. International Journal of Educational Management, 33(1), 194–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bian, Y. F. (2024). Analysis of the current situation and strategies for improving the professionalization of family education instructors in China. Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition), 2023(4), 5–15. [Google Scholar]
- Boyatzis, R. E. (1982). The competent manager: A model for effective performance. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar]
- Boyatzis, R. E. (2011). Managerial and leadership competencies: A behavioral approach to emotional, social and cognitive intelligence. Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective, 15(2), 91–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Conus, X., & Fahrni, L. (2019). Routine communication between teachers and parents from minority groups: An endless misunderstanding? Educational Review, 71(2), 234–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Bruïne, E. J., Willemse, T. M., D’Haem, J., Griswold, P., Vloeberghs, L., & van Eynde, S. (2014). Preparing teacher candidates for family–school partnerships. European Journal of Teacher Education, 37(4), 409–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Coninck, K., Valcke, M., & Vanderlinde, R. (2018). A measurement of student teachers’ parent–teacher communication competences: The design of a video-based instrument. Journal of Education for Teaching, 44(3), 333–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Denessen, E., Bakker, J., Kloppenburg, L., & Kerkhof, M. (2009). Teacher–parent partnerships: Preservice competences and attitudes during teacher training in the Netherlands. International Journal about Parents in Education, 3(1), 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dias, M., & Aylmer, R. (2019). Behavioral event interview: Sound method for in-depth interviews. Oman Chapter of Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 8, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, X. N. Personal communication, Yanshan No. 1 Kindergarten, Shangrao, Jiangxi Province, China. ((2025,, January)).
- Epstein, J. L. (2011). School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools (2nd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Epstein, J. L. (2013). Ready or not? Preparing future educators for school, family, and community partnerships. Teaching Education, 24(2), 115–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Epstein, J. L. (2018). School, family, and community partnerships in teachers’ professional work. Journal of Education for Teaching, 44(3), 397–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Epstein, J. L., & Sanders, M. G. (2006). Prospects for change: Preparing educators for school, family, and community partnerships. Peabody Journal of Education, 81(2), 81–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Evans, M. P. (2013). Educating preservice teachers for family, school, and community engagement. Teaching Education, 24(2), 123–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferlazzo, L. (2011). Involvement or engagement? Educational Leadership, 68(8), 10–14. [Google Scholar]
- Fritz, C. O., Morris, P. E., & Richler, J. J. (2012). Effect size estimates: Current use, calculations, and interpretation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(1), 2–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Getha-Taylor, H. (2008). Identifying collaborative competencies. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 28(2), 103–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, Y. P. Personal communication, Tangxi No. 3 Kindergarten, Linping District, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China. ((2025,, February)).
- Hedlin, M. (2017). ‘They only see their own child’: An interview study of preschool teachers’ perceptions about parents. Early Child Development and Care, 189(11), 1776–1785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huntly, H. (2008). Teachers’ work: Beginning teachers’ conceptions of competence. The Australian Educational Researcher, 35(1), 125–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, L., & Yu, N. (2024). Developing and validating a teachers’ digital competence model and self-assessment instrument for secondary school teachers in China. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 8817–8842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joiner, T. E., Pettit, J. W., Walker, R. L., Voelz, Z. R., Cruz, J., Rudd, M. D., & Lester, D. (2002). Perceived burdensomeness and suicidality: Two studies on the suicide notes of those attempting and those completing suicide. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 21(5), 531–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klassen, R. M., Kim, L., Rushby, J., & Bardach, L. (2020). Can we improve how we screen applicants of initial teacher education? Teaching and Teacher Education, 87, 102949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Levinthal, C., Kuusisto, E., & Tirri, K. (2021). Finnish and portuguese parents’ perspectives on the role of teachers in parent-teacher partnerships and parental engagement. Education Sciences, 11(6), 306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X., Zhang, M., & Zhang, S. (2023). Internal development of preschool teachers at different developmental stages: Problems and countermeasures. Educational Teaching Forum, 45(4), 21–24. Available online: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?dbname=CJFD2023&filename=JYJU202345006&dbcode=CJFD (accessed on 15 October 2023).
- Lievens, F., & Motowidlo, S. J. (2016). Situational judgment tests: From measures of situational judgment to measures of general domain knowledge. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 9(1), 3–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lv, Z. Personal communication, Shangrao No.3 Kindergarten, Shangrao, Jiangxi Province, China. ((2025,, February)).
- Markström, A. M., & Simonsson, M. (2017). Introduction to preschool: Strategies for managing the gap between home and preschool. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 3(2), 179–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mayer, D. (1994). Teacher’s practical knowledge: Obtaining and using knowledge of students. University of Southern Queensland. [Google Scholar]
- McBer, H. (2000). Research into teacher effectiveness: A model of teacher effectiveness. Department for Education and Employment. [Google Scholar]
- McClelland, D. C. (1973). Testing for competence rather than for “intelligence”. American Psychologist, 28(1), 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McClelland, D. C. (1998). Identifying competencies with behavioral-event interviews. Psychological Science, 9(5), 331–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McClelland, D. C., & Boyatzis, R. E. (1980). Opportunities for counselors from the competency assessment movement. The Personnel and Guidance Journal, 58, 368–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2023). Opinions on improving the mechanism for the collaborative education by schools, families, and society. Available online: http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/gzdt_gzdt/s5987/202301/t20230119_1039748.html (accessed on 1 November 2024).
- Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. ((2024,) November 1). Accelerate the construction of the “Teaching Alliance” to gather the educational strength of the whole society. Available online: http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/s5148/202411/t20241101_1160298.html (accessed on 1 November 2024).
- Minke, K. M., Sherida, S. M., Kim, E. M., Ryoo, J. H., & Koziol, N. A. (2014). Congruence in parent-teacher relationships: The role of shared perceptions. Elementary School Journal, 114(4), 527–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Myende, P. E., & Nhlumayo, B. S. (2020). Enhancing parent–teacher collaboration in rural schools: Parents’ voices and implications for schools. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 25(3), 490–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Omrane, A., & Fayolle, A. (2011). Entrepreneurial competencies and entrepreneurial process: A dynamic approach. International Journal of Business and Globalisation, 6, 136–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parry, S. B. (1998). Just what is a competency? And why should you care? Training, 35, 58–64. [Google Scholar]
- Rockstuhl, T., Ang, S., Ng, K.-Y., Lievens, F., & Van Dyne, L. (2015). Putting judging situations into situational judgment tests: Evidence from intercultural multimedia SJTs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(2), 464–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sandberg, J. (2000). Understanding human competence at work: An interpretative approach. Academy of Management Journal, 43(1), 9–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shyr, W. J. (2012). Industry–oriented competency requirements for mechatronics technology in Taiwan. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(4), 195–203. [Google Scholar]
- Söderquist, K. E., Papalexandris, A., Ioannou, G., & Prastacos, G. (2010). From task-based to competency-based. Personnel Review, 39(3), 325–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spencer, L. M., & Spencer, S. M. (1993). Competence at work: Models for superior performance. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar]
- Sun, X. H., Du, J. Y., & Li, Q. (2023). Collaborative nurturing and boundary integration: Teachers’ educational philosophy and practice of family-school-community collaborative education in the United States. Foreign Education Research, 2, 21–36. Available online: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?dbname=CJFD2023&filename=WGJY202302002&dbcode=CJFD (accessed on 1 January 2025).
- Tan, F., Gong, X., Zhang, X., & Zhang, R. (2021). Preschoolers’ approaches to learning and family-school connections during COVID-19: An empirical study based on a Wuhan sample. Early Childhood Education Journal, 49(5), 869–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Uludag, A. (2008). Elementary preservice teachers’ opinions about parental involvement in elementary children’s education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(3), 807–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van der Klink, M., & Boon, J. (2002). The investigation of competencies within professional domains. Human Resource Development International, 5(4), 411–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Visković, I., & Višnjić Jevtić, A. (2017). Teachers’ opinions on the possibilities of collaboration with parents. Croatian Journal of Education, 19(1), 13–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vuorinen, T., & Gu, L. (2023). Swedish preschool student teachers’ views on family–(pre)school partnerships. International Journal about Parents in Education, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vuorinen, T., Sandberg, A., & Sheridan, S. (2014). Preschool teachers’ views on competence in the context of home and preschool collaboration. Journal of Education for Teaching, 40(3), 250–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, B. Personal communication, Wuyuan County No. 5 Kindergarten, Shangrao, Jiangxi Province, China. ((2025,, January)).
- Wang, L. X. (2019). A comparative study of psychological resilience in Chinese and Japanese kindergarten teachers. Educational Research and Experimentation, 7(4), 81–87. [Google Scholar]
- Westergard, E. (2013). Teacher competencies and parental cooperation. International Journal about Parents in Education, 7(2). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Willemse, T. M., Thompson, I., Vanderlinde, R., & Mutton, T. (2018). Family-school partnerships: A challenge for teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 44(3), 252–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Willemse, T. M., Vloeberghs, L., de Bruïne, E. J., & van Eynde, S. (2015). Preparing teachers for family-school partnerships: A Dutch and Belgian perspective. Teaching Education, 27(2), 212–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, X. Q. Personal communication, Heqin Aizhen Kindergarten, Minhang District, Shanghai, China. ((2025,, February)).
- Wu, Z. L. (2016). On comprehensive reform of teacher education centered on normal universities. Journal of Northwest Normal University (Social Sciences Edition), 53(5), 70–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xia, J., Wang, H. Y., & Zhang, S. Y. (2023). A survey study of kindergarten teachers’ competence in guiding family education. Educational Theory and Practice, 43(35), 37–41. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, J. P., & Zhang, H. C. (2006). A competency model of primary and secondary school teachers: A behavioral event interview study. Educational Research, 1, 57–61+87. Available online: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?dbname=CJFD2021&filename=JYXX202110005&dbcode=CJFD (accessed on 15 October 2023).
- Yu, Q. F., Chen, J. Y., & Song, H. (2022). Construction of teacher-parent cooperation competence indicators based on the Delphi method. Journal of Teacher Education Research, 34(6), 44–52. Available online: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?dbname=CJFD2022&filename=GDSZ202206007&dbcode=CJFD (accessed on 15 October 2023).
- Yu, X. Personal communication, Shangrao No.5 Kindergarten, Shangrao, Jiangxi Province, China. ((2025,, February)).
- Yu, X. N. Personal communication, Yanshan No. 1 Kindergarten, Shangrao, Jiangxi Province, China. ((2025,, February)).
- Yuan, K. M., Zhou, X. R., & Ye, P. Q. (2021). Research on the competence model of Home-school Cooperation among primary and secondary school teachers. China Educational Technology, 6, 98–104. Available online: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?dbname=CJFD2021&filename=ZDJY202106013&dbcode=CJFD (accessed on 15 October 2023).
- Zhong, L., & Shi, K. (2007). Assessments on the competency model of senior managers of family firms in China. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 1(4), 544–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Authors | Frameworks of FPPC | Perspectives of Various Roles |
---|---|---|
Westergard (2013) | Relational competence, communication competence, contextual competence | Parents and teachers in Norway |
Vuorinen et al. (2014) | Social and communication skills, the adept implementation of communicative teaching methodologies, capacity to effectively engage with parents | 30 female preschool teachers in Sweden |
Levinthal et al. (2021) | Communication, professionalism, and invitations to active parental participation | Finnish (N = 10) and Portuguese (N = 9) parents |
Q. F. Yu et al. (2022) | Professional beliefs and ethics, professional knowledge, and professional competence and divided into 10 secondary indicators | 21 education experts in China |
Yuan et al. (2021) | Homeschool partnership knowledge, homeschool partnership skills, attitudes and values, personality, and achievement motivation, which are organized into 21 indicators | Theoretical construction of the researcher |
Bian (2024) | Ability to coordinate home education, ability to communicate with parents and teachers, ability to organize home education activities, ability to provide guidance on home education, ability to engage in continuous learning | Published literature in China |
Sample | Gender | Experience Year | Kindergarten Type | Teaching Location |
---|---|---|---|---|
Teacher Zhu | Female | 8 | Public (non-profit) | Urban |
Teacher Xu | Male | 12 | Public (non-profit) | Suburban |
Teacher Dong | Female | 20 | Public (non-profit) | Suburban |
Teacher Yu | Female | 11 | Public (non-profit) | Suburban |
Teacher Yu | Female | 14 | Public (non-profit) | Suburban |
Teacher Pan | Male | 7 | Public (non-profit) | Suburban |
Teacher Li | Female | 7 | Public (non-profit) | Suburban |
Teacher Yang | Female | 20 | Public (non-profit) | Suburban |
Teacher Wang | Female | 10 | Public (non-profit) | Suburban |
Teacher Guo | Female | 7 | Public (non-profit) | Urban |
Teacher Zhang | Male | 4 | Public (non-profit) | Suburban |
Teacher Mo | Female | 15 | Public (non-profit) | Urban |
Teacher Bian | Male | 14 | Public (non-profit) | Urban |
Teacher Sun | Female | 8 | Public (non-profit) | Suburban |
Teacher Dong | Female | 20 | Public (non-profit) | Suburban |
Teacher Shu | Female | 6 | Private (for-profit) | Urban |
Teacher Lv | Female | 11 | Public (non-profit) | Suburban |
Teacher Wu | Female | 5 | Private (for-profit) | Urban |
Teacher Li | Female | 6 | Public (non-profit) | Suburban |
Teacher Yao | Female | 5 | Public (non-profit) | Suburban |
Teacher He | Male | 5 | Private (for-profit) | Urban |
Teacher Wang | Male | 8 | Public (non-profit) | Suburban |
Teacher Zhu | Female | 5 | Public (non-profit) | Suburban |
Teacher Fu | Female | 13 | Public (non-profit) | Suburban |
Teacher Chen | Female | 14 | Public (non-profit) | Suburban |
Teacher You | Male | 6 | Public (non-profit) | Urban |
Teacher Lou | Male | 13 | Public (non-profit) | Urban |
Teacher Qiu | Female | 5 | Public (non-profit) | Urban |
Teacher Ouyang | Female | 11 | Public (non-profit) | Suburban |
Teacher Li | Female | 11 | Public (non-profit) | Suburban |
Competency Items | Group (Mean ± Standard Deviation) | t | p | Adj. p | Cohen’s d | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Typical Group | Outstanding Group | |||||
Child Oriented | 3.00 ± 1.09 | 4.49 ± 0.75 | −4.444 | <0.000 | ** | 1.656 |
Recognition of Importance | 2.71 ± 0.96 | 4.56 ± 0.76 | −5.887 | <0.000 | ** | 2.194 |
Responsible Follow-Up | 3.27 ± 0.52 | 4.67 ± 0.77 | −5.251 | <0.000 | ** | 2.032 |
Knowledge of Family Education | 2.39 ± 0.96 | 4.03 ± 0.73 | −5.314 | <0.000 | ** | 1.980 |
Confidence | 2.05 ± 1.21 | 4.46 ± 0.95 | −5.667 | <0.000 | ** | 2.285 |
Communication and Expression | 2.75 ± 0.92 | 4.64 ± 0.58 | −6.335 | <0.000 | ** | 2.587 |
Guidance and Cooperation | 2.89 ± 0.80 | 4.44 ± 0.49 | −5.996 | <0.000 | ** | 2.452 |
Relationship Management | 2.57 ± 0.80 | 4.08 ± 0.90 | −4.651 | <0.000 | ** | 1.754 |
Empathic Perspective-Taking Skill | 2.60 ± 0.86 | 4.17 ± 0.72 | −5.158 | <0.000 | ** | 2.034 |
Achievement Motivation | 1.86 ± 0.81 | 3.94 ± 0.80 | −6.942 | <0.000 | ** | 2.587 |
Reflective Learning | 2.27 ± 0.96 | 3.66 ± 0.92 | −3.818 | 0.001 | 0.020 # | 1.477 |
Positive Attribution | 2.65 ± 0.69 | 3.87 ± 1.14 | −3.071 | 0.005 | 0.010 # | 1.211 |
Emotional Regulation | 3.03 ± 0.81 | 4.21 ± 1.05 | −3.264 | 0.003 | 0.060 # | 1.231 |
Proactivity | 3.67 ± 0.89 | 4.34 ± 1.39 | −1.474 | 0.152 | — | 0.549 |
Observation and Understanding | 3.47 ± 1.11 | 3.63 ± 0.89 | −0.41 | 0.685 | — | 0.157 |
Planning and Organization | 3.17 ± 1.02 | 3.77 ± 1.33 | −1.365 | 0.184 | — | 0.498 |
Differentiated Teaching Ability | 3.82 ± 1.03 | 3.78 ± 1.02 | 0.091 | 0.928 | — | 0.034 |
Analytical and Diagnostic Skills | 3.26 ± 1.23 | 3.56 ± 0.78 | −0.812 | 0.424 | — | 0.302 |
Knowledge of Children’s Physical and Mental Development | 3.68 ± 0.88 | 3.66 ± 1.31 | 0.043 | 0.966 | — | 0.016 |
Basic Care and Education Knowledge | 3.50 ± 1.72 | 4.27 ± 0.95 | −1.408 | 0.179 | — | 0.587 |
Competency Items | Group (Mean ± Standard Deviation) | t | p | Adj. p | Cohen’s d | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Early Career Stage Group | Late Career Stage Group | |||||
Relationship Management | 4.01 ± 0.79 | 2.64 ± 0.92 | 4.293 | <0.000 | ** | 1.595 |
Observation and Understanding | 4.31 ± 0.70 | 2.81 ± 0.51 | 6.471 | <0.000 | ** | 2.446 |
Planning and Organization | 4.48 ± 0.82 | 2.60 ± 0.76 | 6.262 | <0.000 | ** | 2.367 |
Differentiated Teaching Ability | 4.61 ± 0.51 | 2.93 ± 0.56 | 8.485 | <0.000 | ** | 3.153 |
Analytical and Diagnostic Skills | 4.06 ± 0.72 | 2.83 ± 0.80 | 4.421 | <0.000 | ** | 1.614 |
Recognition of Importance | 4.40 ± 1.15 | 3.24 ± 1.07 | 2.858 | 0.008 | 0.160 # | 1.044 |
Responsible Follow-up | 4.27 ± 1.00 | 3.41 ± 0.75 | 2.534 | 0.018 | 0.360 # | 0.960 |
Basic Care and Education Knowledge | 4.53 ± 0.53 | 3.39 ± 1.66 | 2.544 | 0.021 | 0.420 # | 0.929 |
Knowledge of Family Education | 3.98 ± 0.90 | 2.77 ± 1.08 | 3.311 | 0.003 | 0.060 # | 1.209 |
Communication and Expression | 4.31 ± 0.82 | 3.20 ± 1.25 | 2.874 | 0.008 | 0.160 # | 1.049 |
Guidance and Cooperation | 4.18 ± 0.84 | 3.46 ± 1.03 | 2.076 | 0.047 | 0.940 # | 0.758 |
Empathic Perspective-Taking Skill | 4.06 ± 0.88 | 3.09 ± 1.08 | 2.626 | 0.014 | 0.280 # | 0.995 |
Reflective Learning | 2.97 ± 0.77 | 3.26 ± 1.45 | −0.675 | 0.507 | — | 0.255 |
Positive Attribution | 3.40 ± 1.20 | 3.46 ± 1.15 | −0.134 | 0.894 | — | 0.051 |
Proactivity | 3.83 ± 1.30 | 4.31 ± 1.19 | −1.068 | 0.294 | — | 0.390 |
Child Oriented | 3.82 ± 1.30 | 3.97 ± 1.03 | −0.355 | 0.725 | — | 0.130 |
Confidence | 4.03 ± 1.13 | 2.86 ± 1.90 | 1.809 | 0.09 | — | 0.775 |
Knowledge of Children’s Physical and Mental Development | 3.99 ± 1.02 | 3.37 ± 1.19 | 1.522 | 0.14 | — | 0.566 |
Achievement Motivation | 2.96 ± 1.17 | 3.27 ± 1.45 | −0.646 | 0.523 | — | 0.236 |
Emotional Regulation | 3.75 ± 1.25 | 3.69 ± 1.00 | 0.146 | 0.885 | — | 0.054 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Jiang, P.; Song, X.; Wang, Q.; Wang, X.; Chen, F.; Tu, D. A Crisscrossing Competency Framework for Family–Preschool Partnerships: Perspectives from Chinese Kindergarten Teachers. Behav. Sci. 2025, 15, 694. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15050694
Jiang P, Song X, Wang Q, Wang X, Chen F, Tu D. A Crisscrossing Competency Framework for Family–Preschool Partnerships: Perspectives from Chinese Kindergarten Teachers. Behavioral Sciences. 2025; 15(5):694. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15050694
Chicago/Turabian StyleJiang, Pan, Xuhong Song, Qin Wang, Xiaomeng Wang, Fangbin Chen, and Dongbo Tu. 2025. "A Crisscrossing Competency Framework for Family–Preschool Partnerships: Perspectives from Chinese Kindergarten Teachers" Behavioral Sciences 15, no. 5: 694. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15050694
APA StyleJiang, P., Song, X., Wang, Q., Wang, X., Chen, F., & Tu, D. (2025). A Crisscrossing Competency Framework for Family–Preschool Partnerships: Perspectives from Chinese Kindergarten Teachers. Behavioral Sciences, 15(5), 694. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15050694