Next Article in Journal
Effects of Heat Stress on Semen Quality and Reproductive Performance of Crossbred Boars with Different Maternal Origins
Next Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of Immunoprotective Effects of DNA Vaccine Based on Eimeria maxima EF-1α Antigen and Chicken XCL1 Chemokine
Previous Article in Journal
Dietary Taurine Supplementation Improves Sperm Quality and Modulates Seminal Plasma Metabolism in Heat-Stressed Dairy Goat Bucks
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Centrocone Protein SMC_N1 Is Important for the Proliferation of Toxoplasma gondii Tachyzoites
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 16
Issue 7
10.3390/ani16071087
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Tetravalent Recombinant Subunit Vaccine Provides Protection Against Mixed Challenges with Four Eimeria Species in Chickens

by
Xiao Ma
1,†,
Xichen Zhang
1,†,
Jianhua Li
1,
Pengtao Gong
1,
Xiaocen Wang
1,
Xin Li
1,
Xu Zhang
1,
Tao Zhang
1,
Shuqin Cheng
1,2,* and
Nan Zhang
1,*
1
State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Severe Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, College of Veterinary Medicine, Jilin University, Changchun 130062, China
2
Department of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry, Handan Vocational College of Science and Technology, Handan 056046, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Animals 2026, 16(7), 1087; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16071087
Submission received: 27 January 2026 / Revised: 15 March 2026 / Accepted: 27 March 2026 / Published: 1 April 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Coccidian Parasites: Epidemiology, Control and Prevention Strategies)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Simple Summary

Chicken coccidiosis is a widespread parasitic disease that causes major economic losses in poultry farming. In the field, chickens are often infected by several types of Eimeria parasites at the same time, but currently available commercial vaccines are mainly live oocyst-based products, which carry potential safety risks including reversion to virulence and vaccine strain transmission. To tackle this problem, we developed a subunit vaccine called TEIN, which combines key proteins from four common Eimeria species. Using molecular tools, recombinant proteins were produced, and the vaccine efficacy was tested under controlled experimental conditions. Vaccination significantly elevated serum levels of cytokines and increased the splenic lymphocyte CD4+/CD8+ ratio. In homologous challenge experiments using each of the four Eimeria species individually or in combination, vaccinated chickens showed better weight gain, lower parasite counts, and fewer intestinal lesions, demonstrating that the vaccine conferred strong protection. These results demonstrate that the TEIN vaccine provides effective protection against both single and mixed Eimeria infections under laboratory conditions, but its efficacy under field conditions requires further investigation.

Abstract

Chicken coccidiosis is a parasitic disease caused mainly by Eimeria tenella, Eimeria acervulina, Eimeria maxima, and Eimeria necatrix, with most cases presenting as mixed infections. Currently, although a subunit vaccine (CoxAbic) targeting Eimeria maxima via maternal immunization is commercially available, no genetically engineered multivalent subunit vaccine exists against mixed infections caused by these four Eimeria species simultaneously. Therefore, we developed a tetravalent recombinant subunit vaccine (designated TEIN) by fusing key antigen genes (TA4, 3-1E, IMP1, NA4) from these four Eimeria species and expressing the construct in Pichia pastoris. A total of 500 chickens were randomly allocated into 25 experimental subgroups (n = 20 each), consisting of five groups (control, challenged, adjuvant, pPIC9K, and TEIN) and five challenge conditions (infection with Eimeria tenella, Eimeria acervulina, Eimeria maxima, Eimeria necatrix, or a mixture of four species). Immunization was performed via leg intramuscular injection at 14 and 21 days of age. At 28 days of age, all chickens except the controls were orally challenged with 1 × 104 sporulated oocysts. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way or two-way ANOVA as appropriate. Results showed that chickens vaccinated with the TEIN subunit vaccine exhibited significantly elevated serum levels of IgY, IL-2, IL-10, and IFN-γ, as well as an increased splenic lymphocyte CD4+/CD8+ ratio. The anticoccidial indices (ACI) against Eimeria tenella, Eimeria acervulina, Eimeria maxima, and Eimeria necatrix, and their mixed infection reached 174.82, 174.58, 174.41, 180.61, and 175.95, respectively. Moreover, no significant differences were observed in hematological parameters, serum biochemical markers, or histopathological findings between the vaccinated and control groups. These results demonstrate the vaccine’s potential as a promising candidate for controlling mixed coccidial infections.

1. Introduction

Chicken coccidiosis is a protozoan parasitic disease caused by Eimeria species infecting the intestinal tract of chickens. It is one of the most widespread and economically devastating diseases in poultry production, causing annual global losses exceeding £10 billion and underscoring the urgent need for effective control strategies [1,2]. The control of chicken coccidiosis mainly relies on anticoccidial drugs and live vaccines [3,4]. However, the long-term use of anticoccidial drugs not only leads to drug residues, which threaten food safety, but also may lead to drug resistance in chicken coccidia, increasing the difficulty of preventing and controlling chicken coccidiosis [5,6]. Although live vaccines offer some protective benefits, their application is limited by risks such as reversion to virulence and environmental spread of vaccine strains [7,8,9]. Beyond these concerns, the production of live Eimeria vaccines requires the use of live birds to propagate the parasites, which raises ethical concerns and increases manufacturing costs [10]. Additionally, these vaccines have a relatively short shelf life due to the limited viability of oocysts during storage [11]. Genetically engineered vaccines, such as DNA vaccines and subunit vaccines, offer several advantages over conventional live vaccines, including well-defined antigenic components, the absence of live pathogens and the potential for cost-effective large-scale production [12,13]. Therefore, a safe and efficient genetically engineered vaccine needs to be developed for the prevention and control of chicken coccidiosis.
Genetically engineered vaccines for chicken coccidia mainly include subunit vaccines, DNA vaccines, and live vector vaccines [14,15,16]. Among them, subunit vaccines have become a critical strategy for controlling chicken coccidiosis because of their absence of live pathogens and high stability [17,18]. Currently, the only commercially available subunit vaccine for routine use in coccidiosis control is CoxAbic. This vaccine is based on affinity-purified gametocyte antigens from Eimeria maxima (E. maxima) and is administered to breeding hens to provide passive immunity to their offspring via maternal antibody transfer [19]. In recent years, significant progress has been made in the development of recombinant subunit vaccines and recombinant multivalent subunit vaccines, with research efforts primarily focused on the screening and optimization of antigen targets, multi-antigen combination strategies [20,21]. Recombinant fusion proteins containing multiple antigens tend to induce broader protective immunity than those with a single antigen, offering a promising approach to overcome the limitations of single-antigen formulations [22]. For instance, a recent study reported that the elongation factor 2 (EF2) antigen provided good protection against individual Eimeria species but showed poor efficacy against mixed infection [23]. Another study demonstrated that a combination of three gametocyte antigens (rEnGAM22, rEnGAM56-T, and rEnGAM59) induced stronger immune responses and higher protective efficacy than any single antigen alone [24]. Given the advances in subunit vaccines, the selection of an appropriate expression system is important to achieve the efficient expression of exogenous proteins [25]. The main vector systems commonly used for the expression of chicken coccidia antigenic proteins are Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, and yeast-based platforms [26,27,28]. Among them, Pichia pastoris (P. pastoris) has been used for a long time to produce recombinant proteins because of its rapid fermentation kinetics and low cost [29,30]. The P. pastoris expression system can perform efficient secretory expression of exogenous proteins, and its glycosylation is more suitable for use with mammalian cells, which is conducive to improving the immunogenicity of proteins, thereby establishing it as an ideal platform for developing subunit vaccines [31,32].
Chicken coccidiosis is caused mainly by mixed infections of Eimeria tenella (E. tenella), Eimeria acervulina (E. acervulina), E. maxima, and Eimeria necatrix (E. necatrix). Since most cases involve co-infections, genetically engineered vaccines targeting only a single Eimeria species are inadequate for effective coccidiosis control [33]. In response, studies have shown that through the recombinant expression of protective genes of different coccidia, the constructed multivalent vaccine can provide immune protection against multiple coccidial infections and effectively prevent mixed infection with multiple coccidia [34]. This multivalent vaccine-based strategy can overcome the limitations of monovalent vaccines and improve the protective efficacy of vaccines against multiple coccidial infections [35].
The TA4 gene of E. tenella, the 3-1E gene of E. acervulina, the IMP1 gene of E. maxima, and the NA4 gene of E. necatrix are used as candidate antigens, which can provide partial protection against infections by E. tenella, E. acervulina, E. maxima, and E. necatrix, respectively. However, most existing studies have focused on evaluating the protective efficacy of these antigens individually. There is a lack of research on the tandem expression of these four specific protective antigens (TA4, 3-1E, IMP1, NA4) in a single construct, particularly using the P. pastoris expression system, which offers better post-translational modification capabilities. Furthermore, whether such a tandemly expressed multi-antigen construct can induce effective immune responses against concurrent infections with all four Eimeria species has not been investigated, leaving a significant gap in developing effective multivalent subunit vaccines for mixed coccidial infections. This TEIN vaccine was evaluated for its immunoprotective efficacy and safety in chickens challenged with four Eimeria species, aiming to provide a potential candidate vaccine for mixed Eimeria infections.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Parasite Strains, Vectors, and Experimental Animals

Sporulated oocysts of E. tenella were maintained in our laboratory, while those of E. necatrix and E. acervulina were gifted by Prof. Jianping Tao (Yangzhou University, China), and the sporulated oocysts of E. maxima were donated by Prof. Xiangrui Li (Nanjing Agricultural University, China). All Eimeria strains were propagated via passage in coccidia-free chickens prior to the experiment to ensure viability, and freshly sporulated oocysts stored in 2.5% potassium dichromate at 4 °C for less than three months were used for all challenge infections. The pPIC9K plasmid was used as the expression vector for vaccine construction and was maintained in our laboratory. Newly hatched white broilers were maintained in sanitized coccidia-free isolation units throughout the study period. All animal enclosures and equipment were subjected to rigorous disinfection protocols. The birds were provided ad libitum access to anti-coccidial-free feed and water throughout the experimental period. At the beginning of the study, all chickens were randomly assigned to experimental groups. All animal experiments were conducted strictly following the Regulations for the Administration of Laboratory Animals and approved by the Experimental Animal Welfare Ethics Committee of Jilin University (Ethical Approval No. SY202202101).

2.2. Reagents and Kits

The following reagents were used: restriction enzymes EcoRI and NotI; rTaq DNA polymerase; dNTP mix; DNA Gel Extraction Kit (Takara, Shiga, Japan); Reverse Transcription Kit (TaKaRa, Shiga, Japan); HRP-conjugated 6×His-tag antibody; One-Step Rapid Cloning Kit (Yeasen, Shanghai, China); Plasmid Miniprep Kit (TransGen, Beijing, China); Yeast Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (Tiangen, Beijing, China); Lyticase (Tiangen, Beijing, China); BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA); TMB Single-Component Substrate, ELISA Coating Buffer, and ELISA Stop Solution (Solarbio, Beijing, China); Chicken IL-2, IL-10 and IFN-γ ELISA kits (Fankew, Shanghai, China).

2.3. Preparation of the TEIN Subunit Vaccine

In this study, P. pastoris was chosen, as it performs post-translational modifications, such as glycosylation, and correct folding. It also secretes the protein, which simplifies downstream purification with lower production costs [36]. Flexible GGGGS linkers were inserted between the four antigens to minimize steric hindrance. The TA4 gene of E. tenella (M21004.1), the 3-1E gene of E. acervulina (AF113613.1), the IMP1 gene of E. maxima (KP642747.1), and the NA4 gene of E. necatrix (EU523548.1) were retrieved from NCBI and codon optimized for P. pastoris. These four genes were tandemly fused using GGGGS linkers (designated TEIN: TA4-3-1E-IMP1-NA4) and subsequently cloned and inserted into pPIC9K through seamless cloning (Figure S1). The recombinant plasmid pPIC9K-TEIN was linearized with SacI and transformed into P. pastoris GS115 (now reclassified as Komagataella phaffii) competent cells. Primary transformants were selected on histidine-deficient minimal dextrose medium, and high-copy number recombinant strains were obtained through gradient G418 selection [37]. Positive clones were verified by conducting polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and cultured in yeast extract peptone dextrose (YPD) medium. The cells were grown in buffered minimal glycerol medium with yeast extract (BMGY) at 30 °C with shaking (250 rpm), followed by centrifugation for harvesting. The cell pellet was resuspended in buffered methanol-complex medium with yeast extract (BMMY) to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 1.0 and induced with 1% methanol (maintained by daily supplementation) for 120 h. After induction, the culture was centrifuged at 4 °C and 8000 rpm for 15 min to collect the supernatant. The supernatant was filtered through a 0.22 μm sterile filter and purified via Ni-NTA affinity chromatography. The eluted protein was buffer-exchanged and concentrated via ultrafiltration (30 kDa MWCO) to remove imidazole, followed by endotoxin removal using an endotoxin removal kit (Biorab, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The protein concentration was then determined using the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) method, and the purified TEIN protein was reconstituted with an equal volume of aluminum hydroxide adjuvant (Solarbio, Beijing, China) at 400 μg/mL for immunization.

2.4. Evaluation of Protection Against Challenge

To assess the protective efficacy of the TEIN subunit vaccine against single or mixed infections with E. tenella, E. acervulina, E. maxima, and E. necatrix, one-day-old chickens were randomly allocated into five main groups. The study included five treatment groups (control, challenged, adjuvant, pPIC9K, and TEIN) and five challenge conditions (four single-species infections and one mixed infection), resulting in a total of 25 experimental subgroups with 20 chickens per subgroup (500 birds in total). This group size was selected to ensure sufficient statistical power for evaluating protective efficacy indicators following challenge (Table 1). The chickens in the control and challenged groups received no treatment at 14 and 21 days of age, whereas those in the adjuvant group, pPIC9K group, and TEIN group were intramuscularly injected into the leg muscle with aluminum hydroxide adjuvant, pPIC9K empty vector protein, or TEIN subunit vaccine, respectively, at these time points. All groups except the control group were challenged with single or mixed Eimeria species at 28 days of age. The immunoprotective efficacy of the TEIN subunit vaccine was evaluated by measuring serum anti-TEIN IgY levels, serum cytokines, the CD4+/CD8+ ratio in the spleen, and the anticoccidial index in each group. To minimize bias, all outcome assessments were performed by personnel blinded to the group assignments.

2.4.1. Serum Anti-TEIN IgY Antibody Quantification

Whole blood samples were collected from the wing vein of chickens in each group at 28 days of age using sterile syringes, following the method described by Neepa [38]. Five chickens were randomly selected from each subgroup for antibody analysis. After the samples were left undisturbed at room temperature for serum separation, the serum was collected by centrifugation at 3000 rpm (850× g) for 15 min. TEIN-specific IgY antibody levels were measured via indirect ELISA [39]. Briefly, 96-well plates were coated with TEIN protein (1 μg/well in ELISA coating buffer, pH 9.6, Solarbio, Beijing, China) and incubated overnight at 4 °C. Following three washes with PBST, the plates were blocked with 5% (w/v) skim milk in PBST at 37 °C for 2 h and washed again three times with PBST. Each serum sample was tested in triplicate wells. Test sera (1:100 dilution) were added and incubated at 37 °C for 2 h. After three additional PBST washes, 100 μL of horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated rabbit anti-chicken IgY secondary antibody (1:5000 dilution in PBST; Earthox, Burlingame, CA, USA) was added to each well and incubated at 37 °C for 1 h. The 1:5000 dilution was selected based on the manufacturer’s recommended working range for ELISA. Following five washes, 100 μL of TMB substrate solution (Solarbio, Beijing, China) was added to each well and incubated at 37 °C in the dark for 15 min. The reaction was stopped with ELISA Stop Solution (Solarbio, Beijing, China), and the OD450 was measured within 15 min using a microplate reader (DeTie, Nanjing, China). Antibody levels were expressed as OD450 values. To minimize inter-assay variation, all samples were analyzed on the same day using the same batch of reagents.

2.4.2. Detection of Serum Cytokines

Whole blood samples were collected from chickens in each group when they were 21 and 28 days old. At each time point, three chickens were randomly selected from each subgroup for cytokine analysis. After serum separation at room temperature and centrifugation, serum samples were collected and analyzed for IL-2, IL-10, and IFN-γ levels using commercial ELISA kits (Fankew, Shanghai, China) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The kit sensitivities were <1 pg/mL for IL-2, 1 ng/L for IL-10, and 3 pg/mL for IFN-γ, according to the manufacturer’s specifications.

2.4.3. Determination of the Splenic CD4+/CD8+ Ratio

Spleens were collected from chickens in each group when they were 21 and 28 days old. At each time point, three chickens were randomly selected from each subgroup. After removing the capsule, the spleens were cut into small pieces and gently mashed through a 70 μm cell strainer using a syringe plunger, with frequent rinsing using PBS to obtain single-cell suspensions [40]. Erythrocytes were removed via density gradient centrifugation using chicken spleen lymphocyte separation medium (Solarbio, Beijing, China). After erythrocyte depletion, 1 × 106 cells were aliquoted into centrifuge tubes and resuspended in 100 μL of PBS. Each tube was stained with 7 μL of anti-chicken CD3 SPRD (clone CT-3, 0.1 mg/mL), anti-chicken CD4 FITC (clone CT-4, 0.5 mg/mL), and anti-chicken CD8 PE (clone EP72, 0.1 mg/mL) antibodies (SouthernBiotech, Birmingham, AL, USA), followed by incubation at room temperature in the dark for 30 min. After three washes with PBS, the cells were resuspended in 500 μL of flow cytometry staining buffer and analyzed for CD4+/CD8+ ratios by conducting flow cytometry (BD FACSCanto II, BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). CD3-positive cells were first gated, and within this population, the percentages of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were then determined.

2.4.4. Anticoccidial Index (ACI)

The protective efficacy was evaluated using the ACI [41], which was calculated as follows: ACI = (survival rate + relative rate of weight gain) − (lesion score + oocyst value). Survival rate was determined as the percentage of chickens surviving until the end of the experiment in each group. Relative rate of weight gain was calculated using the formula: (weight gain rate of experimental group/weight gain rate of control group) × 100. Lesion score was assessed according to the method of Johnson and Reid [42] by personnel blinded to the group assignments based on the severity of intestinal lesions. Oocyst counts were determined using a McMaster counting chamber following standard protocols. This comprehensive index integrates multiple parameters to quantitatively assess vaccine efficacy against coccidial infection.

2.5. Safety Evaluation

The safety evaluation design addressed critical requirements for vaccines [43]. Multiple dosage groups (100 μg single dose, 100 μg booster, 300 μg high dose) were included to simulate clinical scenarios: standard immunization, repeated administration, and accidental overdosing. Hematological parameters and serum biochemistry were selected to detect potential toxicity to hematopoietic, hepatic, and renal systems—organs particularly vulnerable to vaccine-related adverse effects [44]. Long-term histopathological examination (15, 30, 60 days post-immunization) of major organs was critical, as food-producing animals require vaccines to be free of delayed toxicity, ensuring meat safety [45]. To assess the safety profile of the TEIN subunit vaccine, 100 one-day-old chickens were randomly allocated into four groups: a control group (Control) and three experimental groups (Groups A, B, and C). The control group received no treatment. In the experimental groups, chickens in Group A were intramuscularly injected with 100 μg of the TEIN subunit vaccine in the leg muscle at one day of age. Chickens in Group B received three intramuscular injections of 100 μg of the TEIN subunit vaccine at 7, 14, and 21 days of age. Chickens in Group C received a single intramuscular injection of 300 μg of the TEIN subunit vaccine at 14 days of age. All injections were administered at a volume of 100 μL per chicken. Throughout the experiment, all chickens were observed daily for mortality, general clinical status, and local injection site reactions. The detailed immunization schedule and dosage regimen are presented in Table 2. The safety evaluation included hematological analysis (complete blood count), serum biochemical profiling, and histopathological examination of major organs with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining.

Hematological, Serum Biochemical, and Histopathological Analyses

For safety evaluation, whole blood samples were collected from the wing vein of chickens in each group at 7, 14, and 21 days after the final immunization using sterile syringes [38]. At each time point, 3 chickens were randomly selected from each group. From each chicken, blood samples were collected using both EDTA-2Na anticoagulant tubes (for hematological analysis) and tubes without anticoagulant (for serum biochemical analysis). Hematological parameters, including red blood cell count, white blood cell count, hemoglobin concentration, and hematocrit levels, were measured by Saivel Biological Co., Ltd. (Changchun, China). For serum biochemical analysis, all blood samples were processed immediately after collection to minimize nutrient consumption by nucleated erythrocytes. Serum was obtained via centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C and analyzed by Saivel Biological Co., Ltd. (Changchun, China) via standard automated biochemistry assays. The following parameters were quantified: glucose, triglycerides, urea, total cholesterol, total protein, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and amylase.
For histopathological examination, at 15, 30, and 60 days post-final immunization, cardiac, hepatic, splenic, pulmonary, renal, and intestinal tissues were collected from each group. At each time point, 3 randomly selected chickens per group were euthanized for tissue collection. Tissues were fixed in paraformaldehyde for 24 h, then dehydrated, embedded in paraffin, and cut into sections (3 μm thick). After deparaffinization and alcohol gradient rehydration, the sections were stained with H&E for microscopic evaluation of pathological changes in major organs.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 8.0. The data are presented as the mean ± SD. Normality of the data was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. For pairwise comparisons between two groups, a paired t-test was used. For comparisons involving multiple groups and time points, a two-way ANOVA was conducted followed by Šidák’s multiple comparisons test. Differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Preparation of TEIN Recombinant Protein

The purified TEIN protein was analyzed via SDS-PAGE, with pPIC9K serving as the control. The results of Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining and destaining are presented in Figure 1A. The predicted molecular weight of TEIN was 110 kDa, and it was observed at the expected molecular weight based on SDS-PAGE. The yield of the purified TEIN protein was approximately 20 mg/L of culture supernatant. Western blotting analysis of the TEIN protein (Figure 1B) revealed a specific band at 110 kDa, which corresponded well with the SDS-PAGE results.

3.2. Evaluation of the Immunoprotective Efficacy of the TEIN Subunit Vaccine

3.2.1. Serum Anti-TEIN IgY Antibody Detection

Serum levels of TEIN-specific IgY antibodies were quantified by conducting indirect ELISA at 28 days of age (Figure 2). Compared to the control group, the TEIN group presented significantly higher anti-TEIN IgY antibody levels (p < 0.001) at this time point. These results indicated that the TEIN subunit vaccine has excellent immunogenicity and effectively induces TEIN-specific IgY antibody production in chickens.

3.2.2. The TEIN Subunit Vaccine Enhances Serum IL-2, IFN-γ, and IL-10 Levels in Chickens

Serum concentrations of IL-2, IFN-γ, and IL-10 were determined at 21 and 28 days of age in each group of chickens using commercial ELISA kits. Compared to the control group, the TEIN group presented significantly higher levels of IL-2 (Figure 3A), IFN-γ (Figure 3B), and IL-10 (Figure 3C) following primary immunization (p < 0.001). On day 28, the TEIN group presented significantly elevated levels of IL-2 and IFN-γ compared to the 21-day group (p < 0.001), whereas the IL-10 concentration exhibited a modest but significant increase (p < 0.05) (Figure 3). These results indicate that the TEIN vaccine effectively stimulated the production of IL-2, IL-10, and IFN-γ following primary immunization, with booster immunization resulting in a more pronounced increase in IL-2 and IFN-γ levels than the increase in IL-10 levels. These findings indicate that the TEIN subunit vaccine promotes a balanced immune response.

3.2.3. The TEIN Subunit Vaccine Increases the Splenic CD4+/CD8+ Ratio in Chickens

Chicken spleens from each group were collected at 21 and 28 days of age, made into single-cell suspensions after erythrocytes were removed, and then stained with anti-chicken CD3 SPRD, anti-chicken CD4 FITC, and anti-chicken CD8 PE flow antibodies to detect changes in the CD4+/CD8+ ratio. The TEIN group had significantly greater CD4+/CD8+ ratios at 21 and 28 days of age than the control group (p < 0.001) (Figure 4). Compared to that in the initial immunization group, the ratio of CD4+/CD8+ T cells was significantly greater in the TEIN group after booster immunization (p < 0.001). These results suggest that the TEIN subunit vaccine can enhance the immune function of chickens and improve the level of immune response in the body. An elevated CD4+/CD8+ ratio reflects enhanced T cell-mediated immunity, which plays a key role in protecting against intracellular parasites such as Eimeria. Therefore, the increased CD4+/CD8+ ratio observed in the TEIN group suggests that the vaccine may enhance protective immunity against coccidiosis.

3.2.4. Anticoccidial Index Analysis

To evaluate the protective efficacy of the TEIN subunit vaccine against single infections with E. tenella, E. acervulina, E. maxima, and E. necatrix as well as mixed infections, the protective effect was comprehensively assessed using ACI (Table 3). Following immunization with the TEIN vaccine and subsequent challenge with each Eimeria species, the lesion scores were 14 for E. tenella, 10 for E. acervulina, 10 for E. maxima, 10.04 for E. necatrix, and 10 for mixed infection, whereas the lesion scores in the corresponding challenged groups ranged from 36 to 38. According to established criteria, ACI values ≥ 180 indicate good protection, values between 160 and 179 indicate moderate protection, and values below 160 indicate poor protection. The ACIs for the TEIN subunit vaccines against E. tenella, E. acervulina, E. maxima, and E. necatrix, single infections and mixed infections with all four species were 174.82, 174.58, 174.41, 180.61, and 175.95, respectively. These results demonstrate that the TEIN subunit vaccine provides effective protection against both single and mixed infections with these four Eimeria species.

3.3. Safety Evaluation of the TEIN Subunit Vaccine

Throughout the experimental period, no mortality or abnormal clinical signs were observed in any of the vaccinated groups. All chickens remained healthy with normal mental status, appetite, feather condition, and behavior, and no local injection site reactions were noted at any time point post-immunization.

3.3.1. Hematological Parameters in Chickens After TEIN Vaccination

Complete blood counts were performed on samples collected at 7, 14, and 21 days post-final immunization, and the red blood cell count, white blood cell count, hemoglobin, and hematocrit were measured (Table S1). No significant differences were found between experimental groups (A, B, and C) and the control group (p > 0.05), indicating that administering the TEIN subunit vaccine at different doses and frequencies did not significantly affect hematological parameters. These findings demonstrate the absence of hematotoxicity or adverse effects associated with TEIN vaccination.

3.3.2. Serum Biochemical Parameters in Chickens After TEIN Vaccination

Serum biochemical profiles were analyzed at 7, 14, and 21 days post-final immunization. No significant differences were observed between the experimental groups (A, B, and C) and the control group in the levels of glucose, triglycerides, urea, total cholesterol, total protein, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, or amylase at any time point (p > 0.05; Table S2), confirming that TEIN vaccination did not adversely affect hepatic, renal, or metabolic functions. These results confirmed the safety profile of the TEIN subunit vaccine.

3.3.3. Histopathological Evaluation of the Major Organs After TEIN Vaccination

Histopathological evaluation of cardiac, hepatic, splenic, pulmonary, renal, and intestinal tissues was conducted at 15, 30, and 60 days after the final immunization. In the event of vaccine-induced toxicity, expected pathological changes may include inflammatory cell infiltration, cellular necrosis, tissue degeneration, congestion, hemorrhage, or fibroplasia in target organs. However, microscopic examination revealed no significant pathological alterations in any of the examined organs, with representative images shown in Figure 5, confirming the absence of vaccine-induced tissue damage. These results suggest that TEIN vaccination results in a favorable safety profile in terms of histopathological changes in major organs.

4. Discussion

Under field conditions, chicken coccidiosis typically presents as mixed infections with multiple Eimeria species [46]. Current research indicates that an ideal coccidiosis vaccine should not only provide cross-protection against multiple Eimeria infections but also demonstrate high efficacy, safety, and production feasibility to meet practical farming requirements [47,48]. Notably, the P. pastoris expression system used in this study is well-established for industrial-scale fermentation, with reported yields of recombinant proteins reaching up to several grams per liter under optimized high-cell-density fermentation conditions [49]. The TEIN protein yield obtained in this study (20 mg/L from shake flask culture) represents the expression level without further fermentation optimization. Further optimization of fermentation processes could potentially increase the yield to levels suitable for commercial application [50].
Protective antigenic genes of Eimeria constitute the foundation for developing effective vaccines [51]. These genes primarily include those expressed during the sporozoite, merozoite, and gametocyte developmental stages [52,53,54]. Among these genes, the A4 gene is designated TA4 in E. tenella (known as SAG1) and NA4 in E. necatrix, both of which are predominantly expressed during the sporozoite stage and are involved in sporozoite adhesion and invasion. Vaccines targeting TA4 and NA4 have demonstrated protective efficacy against E. tenella and E. necatrix infections [34,55]. The 3-1E gene, which is expressed mainly during the sporozoite and schizont stages, encodes highly immunogenic proteins. Studies have shown that a 3-1E-based DNA vaccine reduces oocyst shedding in E. acervulina-infected chickens, achieving an ACI of 169.55 [56]. IMP1 is a highly conserved membrane protein in E. maxima [57,58]. Nanoparticle vaccines incorporating IMP1 have shown protective effects against E. maxima infection, improving feed conversion efficiency and body weight gain in challenged birds [59]. Subsequent studies confirmed that transgenic Eimeria vaccines expressing EmIMP1 significantly reduced intestinal lesions and inhibited the proliferation of E. maxima in commercial broilers [60].
Several recent studies have developed recombinant subunit vaccines against Eimeria infections, but most have focused on single-species protection [61,62,63,64], which limits their applicability in the field where mixed infections predominate. Although one study evaluated a single-antigen vaccine against mixed infections and reported reduced oocyst shedding [65], protection conferred by a single antigen may be insufficient to provide adequate protection against mixed infections with multiple Eimeria species. Unlike previous studies that focused on expressing a single Eimeria protein and only targeted single-species infections, in this study, the genes encoding E. tenella TA4, E. maxima 3-1E, E. necatrix IMP1, and E. acervulina NA4 were expressed in tandem to construct a TEIN subunit vaccine. The immunization schedule and dose were determined based on the protocol described by Huang [66]. Following immunization, chickens were challenged with 10,000 oocysts per chicken, a standardized dose widely adopted in previous studies within experimental challenge models [67,68], and the protective efficacy of the TEIN subunit vaccine against single infections of E. tenella, E. necatrix, E. acervulina, and E. maxima was evaluated by calculating the ACI. The results indicated that the TEIN subunit vaccine provided effective protection against E. tenella, E. necatrix, E. acervulina, and E. maxima infections in chickens, with ACIs of 174.82, 180.61, 174.58, and 174.41, respectively. These findings suggest that the tandem expression of multiple protective antigen genes from Eimeria species is a viable strategy to enhance the immunoprotective effects of vaccines against various coccidian parasites. Similarly, a multiepitope vaccine containing antigenic epitopes from E. necatrix NA4, E. tenella SAG1, E. acervulina LDH, and E. maxima CDPK was developed by Yu et al. [69] and showed high efficacy of protection against single infections of E. necatrix, E. acervulina, E. tenella, and E. maxima. The results revealed that chickens immunized with this multiepitope vaccine presented significantly better growth performance and a marked reduction in oocyst output in the intestinal contents when challenged with any of the four Eimeria species. However, the study did not assess the efficacy of the vaccine against mixed infections with these coccidian species. Unlike previous studies, the present one further evaluated the immunoprotective effect of the TEIN subunit vaccine on chickens with mixed infections of E. tenella, E. necatrix, E. acervulina, and E. maxima (the dominant clinical scenario). The results revealed that vaccination with the TEIN subunit vaccine significantly increased relative weight gain in chickens challenged with mixed infections, yielding an ACI of 175.95, while all groups maintained 100% survival throughout the experiment. This ACI value is similar to those obtained from single-species challenges, suggesting that the mixed infection model is suitable for evaluating vaccine efficacy under conditions mimicking natural exposure. These findings indicate that the TEIN subunit vaccine can provide effective immune protection against co-infections involving E. tenella, E. necatrix, E. acervulina, and E. maxima.
To evaluate the immunoprotective effects of TEIN vaccines, it is essential to assess IgY levels, CD4+/CD8+ ratios, and cytokine profiles, as these parameters reflect immune system activation and inflammatory modulation by TEIN subunit vaccines. IgY, an immunoglobulin abundantly present in birds, shares functional similarities with mammalian IgG and plays a protective role against Eimeria infections in avian species [70,71]. In this study, the constructed TEIN subunit vaccine significantly elevated serum IgY levels in chickens, with the TEIN group showing the highest IgY concentrations following the second immunization. These findings indicate that the TEIN subunit vaccine effectively activates humoral immunity, leading to the production of specific antibodies. CD4+ T cells function as helper T cells by secreting cytokines such as IL-2 and IFN-γ, which activate macrophages and B cells to mediate cellular and humoral immune responses, respectively, thereby increasing resistance to infection [72]. CD8+ T cells, as cytotoxic T cells, can directly eliminate coccidia-infected cells and suppress coccidia proliferation through IFN-γ secretion [73,74,75]. Coccidian infection in chickens significantly promotes the activation of CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells, which synergize to exert anti-infective effects and establish immune protection [76,77]. In this study, after chickens were immunized with the TEIN subunit vaccine, the CD4+/CD8+ ratios, along with the levels of IL-2 and IFN-γ, significantly increased, suggesting that the immune system of chickens was activated by the TEIN subunit vaccine. Additionally, IL-10, a crucial anti-inflammatory factor, can suppress excessive immune responses and maintain immune homeostasis [78,79]. The elevated IL-10 levels observed in this study suggest that the TEIN vaccine may prevent hyperactivation of the immune system through modulation of the inflammatory response. However, whether this immunoregulatory balance is associated with proper protein folding in P. pastoris requires further investigation.
With increasingly stringent requirements for disease prevention and control, vaccine safety has become important in both research and application [80]. In this study, the safety of the TEIN subunit vaccine was evaluated using hematological, serum biochemical, and histopathological analyses. Hematological parameters showed no significant differences between vaccinated and control groups, consistent with the approach used by Liu [81], who demonstrated DNA vaccine safety based on the absence of hematological abnormalities. Serum biochemical markers were selected to assess metabolic and organ health in poultry, as they provide reliable indicators of hepatic and renal function across different physiological stages [82]; no significant differences were observed between vaccinated and control groups, indicating that the TEIN vaccine did not adversely affect metabolic or organ function. Histopathological examination revealed no pathological alterations in major organs, supporting histopathology as a critical tool for vaccine safety monitoring, as emphasized by ref. [83]. Collectively, these complementary assessments demonstrate that the TEIN subunit vaccine exhibits a favorable safety profile in chickens.
Selection of an appropriate vaccine delivery route is critical for ensuring both efficacy and safety in poultry immunization. In this study, intramuscular injection into the leg muscle was selected as the delivery method for the TEIN subunit vaccine. This route has been widely employed in experimental poultry vaccine studies due to its ability to ensure consistent and accurate vaccine delivery, precise control of injection volume, and reliable induction of systemic immune responses [84]. Although individual intramuscular injection is labor-intensive and time-consuming, mass vaccination methods such as drinking water or spray (aerosol) administration often lack dose uniformity among individual birds during the delivery process, which may result in inadequate vaccine-induced immunity [85]. However, the use of intramuscular injection, particularly in day-old chicks, requires careful consideration of potential risks including muscle damage, injection site reactions, and handling stress. Indeed, alternative delivery routes have shown promise in poultry vaccination. For instance, oral administration of recombinant Lactobacillus plantarum expressing E. tenella antigens significantly increased intestinal IgA and serum IgG antibody titers, enhanced Th1 cytokine responses (IL-2 and IFN-γ), and reduced oocyst shedding following challenge infection [15]. Similarly, intranasal immunization with immunostimulatory complexes (ISCOMs) containing E. tenella antigens was demonstrated to be the most effective route for inducing protective immune responses compared to in ovo or intramuscular administration [86]. These findings suggest that while intramuscular injection remains a reliable method for experimental vaccine evaluation, the exploration of alternative administration routes could offer practical advantages for large-scale poultry immunization.
While the TEIN vaccine conferred effective protection against both single and mixed Eimeria infections under controlled laboratory conditions, its efficacy under complex field settings remains to be determined. In addition, the experimental period was relatively short, and long-term immunity as well as the duration of protection induced by the vaccine were not assessed. Furthermore, although key cytokines and T cell subsets were measured, the cellular immune mechanisms underlying the observed protection were not investigated in depth. The protective efficacy of the vaccine was also evaluated only in broilers, and its effect in laying hens remains unknown. Future studies, including field trials, long-term monitoring, and more detailed immunological analyses, are warranted to further validate the potential application of the TEIN vaccine.

5. Conclusions

In this study, the TEIN subunit vaccine was developed and its protective efficacy was evaluated against single and mixed infections with E. tenella, E. necatrix, E. acervulina, and E. maxima under controlled laboratory conditions. The vaccine exhibited a favorable safety profile and conferred protection against both single and mixed Eimeria infections in chickens. Further studies, including field trials to assess efficacy under natural farming conditions and evaluation of long-term protection, are warranted to support its potential application.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ani16071087/s1, Figure S1: Schematic diagram of the recombinant plasmid pPIC9K-TEIN; Table S1: Hematological parameters in chickens following TEIN subunit vaccination; Table S2: Serum biochemical parameters in chickens following TEIN subunit vaccination.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.M. and X.Z. (Xichen Zhang); methodology, X.M. and N.Z.; validation, X.M., X.Z. (Xichen Zhang), J.L., P.G., X.W., X.L., X.Z. (Xu Zhang) and T.Z.; formal analysis, X.Z. (Xichen Zhang); investigation, X.M., X.Z. (Xichen Zhang), J.L., P.G., X.W., X.L., X.Z. (Xu Zhang) and T.Z.; data curation, X.M.; writing—original draft preparation, X.M.; writing—review and editing, S.C. and N.Z.; supervision, S.C. and N.Z.; funding acquisition, X.Z. (Xichen Zhang) and N.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 32373033) and the Science and Technology Development Program of Jilin Province (No. 20230202084NC).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This animal study was approved by the Experimental Animal Welfare Ethics Committee of Jilin University (Ethical Approval No. SY202202101). This study was conducted in accordance with the Regulations for the Administration of Laboratory Animals and institutional requirements.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors upon request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to Xiangrui Li and Jianping Tao for generously providing the Eimeria strains essential for this study, which laid a critical foundation for the smooth implementation of the experimental work. We also extend our heartfelt thanks to the staff of the laboratory for their dedicated technical support and assistance throughout the experiment, as well as to our colleagues for their valuable help and innovative ideas that contributed to the progress and improvement of this research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
P. pastorisPichia pastoris
IgYImmunoglobulin Y
IL-2Interleukin-2
IL-10Interleukin-10
IFN-γInterferon-gamma
ACIAnticoccidial Index
SDS-PAGESodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
HRP Horseradish peroxidase
PBSTPhosphate-buffered saline with Tween-20
BCA Bicinchoninic acid
MD platesHistidine-deficient minimal dextrose plates
YPD mediumYeast extract-peptone-dextrose medium
BMGY mediumBuffered glycerol-complex medium
BMMY mediumBuffered methanol-complex medium
Ni-NTA Nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid
H&EHematoxylin and eosin stain

References

  1. Mesa-Pineda, C.; Navarro-Ruíz, J.L.; López-Osorio, S.; Chaparro-Gutiérrez, J.J.; Gómez-Osorio, L.M. Chicken coccidiosis: From the parasite lifecycle to control of the disease. Front. Vet. Sci. 2021, 8, 787653. [Google Scholar]
  2. Blake, D.P.; Knox, J.; Dehaeck, B.; Huntington, B.; Rathinam, T.; Ravipati, V.; Ayoade, S.; Gilbert, W.; Adebambo, A.O.; Jatau, I.D. Re-calculating the cost of coccidiosis in chickens. Vet. Res. 2020, 51, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  3. Chapman, H.D.; Cherry, T.E.; Danforth, H.D.; Richards, G.; Williams, R.B. Sustainable coccidiosis control in poultry production: The role of live vaccines. Int. J. Parasitol. 2002, 32, 617–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  4. Chapman, H.D.; Rathinam, T. Focused review: The role of drug combinations for the control of coccidiosis in commercially reared chickens. Int. J. Parasitol. Drugs Drug Resist. 2022, 18, 32–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  5. Abbas, R.Z.; Iqbal, Z.; Blake, D.; Khan, M.N.; Saleemi, M.K. Anticoccidial drug resistance in fowl coccidia: The state of play revisited. Worlds Poult. Sci. J. 2011, 67, 337–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  6. Rana, M.S.; Lee, S.Y.; Kang, H.J.; Hur, S.J. Reducing Veterinary Drug Residues in Animal Products: A Review. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 2019, 39, 687–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  7. Zheng, L.; Zhang, L.; Tan, F.; Wang, C.; Lv, X.; Bai, R.; Huo, N.; Zheng, M. Prevention and control of chicken coccidiosis construction of recombinant Lactococcus lactis expressing chicken IL-4 and IL-2 fusion protein and its immune synergistic effect on chicken coccidia live vaccine. Poult. Sci. 2023, 102, 102530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  8. Williams, R.B. Anticoccidial vaccines for broiler chickens: Pathways to success. Avian Pathol. 2002, 31, 317–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  9. Liu, Q.; Liu, X.; Zhao, X.; Zhu, X.Q.; Suo, X. Live attenuated anticoccidial vaccines for chickens. Trends Parasitol. 2023, 39, 1087–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  10. Soutter, F.; Werling, D.; Tomley, F.M.; Blake, D.P. Poultry Coccidiosis: Design and Interpretation of Vaccine Studies. Front. Vet. Sci. 2020, 7, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  11. Attree, E.; Sanchez-Arsuaga, G.; Jones, M.; Xia, D.; Marugan-Hernandez, V.; Blake, D.; Tomley, F. Controlling the causative agents of coccidiosis in domestic chickens; an eye on the past and considerations for the future. CABI Agric. Biosci. 2021, 2, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  12. Gregersen, J.P. DNA vaccines. Die Naturwissenschaften 2001, 88, 504–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  13. Iqbal, S.; Tanveer, S.; Allaie, I.M.; Jan, Y.; Tramboo, S.; Maqbool, N. Development and immunological insights into recombinant/subunit vaccines against avian coccidiosis. J. Microbiol. Methods 2025, 238, 107255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  14. Chen, X.; Qiu, X.; Ni, J.; Liao, S.; Qi, N.; Li, J.; Lv, M.; Lin, X.; Cai, H.; Hu, J. Immunoprotective effects of DNA vaccine against Eimeria tenella based on EtAMA3 and EtRON2L2. Vet. Parasitol. 2024, 327, 110141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  15. Pan, T.X.; Huang, H.B.; Zhang, J.L.; Li, J.Y.; Li, M.H.; Zhao, D.Y.; Li, Y.N.; Zheng, W.; Ma, R.G.; Wang, N.; et al. Lactobacillus plantarum surface-displayed Eimeria tenella profilin antigens with FliC flagellin elicit protection against coccidiosis in chickens. Poult. Sci. 2023, 102, 102945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  16. Wallach, M.G.; Udi, A.; Amnon, M.; Smith, N.C.; Ratner, A.J. Field application of a subunit vaccine against an enteric protozoan disease. PLoS ONE 2008, 3, e3948. [Google Scholar]
  17. Blake, D.P.; Tomley, F.M. Securing poultry production from the ever-present Eimeria challenge. Trends Parasitol. 2013, 30, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  18. Jenkins, M.C. Progress on developing a recombinant coccidiosis vaccine. Int. J. Parasitol. 1998, 28, 1111–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  19. Sharman, P.A.; Smith, N.C.; Wallach, M.G.; Katrib, M. Chasing the golden egg: Vaccination against poultry coccidiosis. Parasite Immunol. 2010, 32, 590–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  20. Fadahunsi, A.I.; Atansuyi, A.J.; Adebayo, A.I.; Chineke, C.A. Immunoinformatics-Aided Design of a Multiepitope Vaccine Against Eimeria Tenella-Associated Chicken Coccidiosis. Bioinform. Biol. Insights 2025, 19, 11779322251348307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  21. Lee, Y.; Park, I.; Wickramasuriya, S.S.; Arous, J.B.; Koziol, M.-E.; Lillehoj, H.S. Co-administration of chicken IL-7 or NK-lysin peptide 2 enhances the efficacy of Eimeria elongation factor-1α vaccination against Eimeria maxima infection in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2022, 101, 102013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  22. Wei, H.; Chen, S.; Liu, C.; Huang, H.; Su, X.; Bai, Y.; Liang, L.; Ding, J.; Tang, X.; Luo, H.; et al. Fusion with CTB enhances the immunogenicity and protective efficacy of MIC2 subunit vaccine against Eimeria tenella. Poult. Sci. 2025, 104, 105296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  23. Mi, Y.; Ding, W.; Xu, L.; Lu, M.; Yan, R.; Li, X.; Song, X. Protective Efficacy Induced by the Common Eimeria Antigen Elongation Factor 2 against Challenge with Three Eimeria Species in Chickens. Vaccines 2023, 12, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  24. Wang, F.; Cao, L.; Wang, L.; Xu, J.; Tao, J.; Liu, D. Characterization of the Antigenic and Immunogenic Properties of the Gametocyte Antigen 56 from Eimeria necatrix. Animals 2025, 15, 1750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  25. Yeoh, J.X.; Choong, Y.S.; Lim, T.S. A kaleidoscope of hosts: Expression systems of recombinant antibody reagents for immunological assays. Protein Expr. Purif. 2026, 239, 106857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  26. Zhao, Y.; Liu, Y.; Liu, L.; Zhao, Y.; Qin, J. Expression and identification of the ADF-linker-3-1E gene of Eimeria acervulina of chicken. Parasitol. Res. 2016, 115, 1641–1647. [Google Scholar]
  27. Chen, Z.; Zheng, C.; Peng, Q.; Zhou, Q.; Du, Y.; Zhang, H. Construction of recombinant SAG22 Bacillus subtilis and its effect on immune protection of coccidia. Poult. Sci. 2023, 102, 102780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  28. Soutter, F.; Werling, D.; Nolan, M.; Küster, T.; Attree, E.; Marugán-Hernández, V.; Kim, S.; Tomley, F.M.; Blake, D.P. A novel whole yeast-based subunit oral vaccine against Eimeria tenella in chickens. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 809711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  29. Karbalaei, M.; Rezaee, S.A.; Farsiani, H. Pichia pastoris: A highly successful expression system for optimal synthesis of heterologous proteins. J. Cell. Physiol. 2020, 235, 5867–5881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  30. Eskandari, A.; Nezhad, N.G.; Leow, T.C.; Rahman, M.B.A.; Oslan, S.N. Current achievements, strategies, obstacles, and overcoming the challenges of the protein engineering in Pichia pastoris expression system. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2024, 40, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  31. Cereghino, J.L.; Cregg, J.M. Heterologous protein expression in the methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2000, 24, 45–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bill, R.M. Recombinant protein subunit vaccine synthesis in microbes: A role for yeast? J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2015, 67, 319–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  33. Ahmad, T.A.; El-Sayed, B.A.; El-Sayed, L.H. Development of immunization trials against Eimeria spp. Trials Vaccinol. 2016, 5, 38–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  34. Song, X.; Gao, Y.; Xu, L.; Yan, R.; Li, X. Partial protection against four species of chicken coccidia induced by multivalent subunit vaccine. Vet. Parasitol. 2015, 212, 80–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  35. Blake, D.P.; Pastor-Fernández, I.; Nolan, M.J.; Tomley, F.M. Recombinant anticoccidial vaccines—A cup half full? Infect. Genet. Evol. 2017, 55, 358–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  36. Puxbaum, V.; Mattanovich, D.; Gasser, B. Quo vadis? The challenges of recombinant protein folding and secretion in Pichia pastoris. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 99, 2925–2938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  37. Scorer, C.A.; Clare, J.J.; McCombie, W.R.; Romanos, M.A.; Sreekrishna, K. Rapid selection using G418 of high copy number transformants of Pichia pastoris for high-level foreign gene expression. Bio/Technol. Nat. Publ. Co. 1994, 12, 181–184. [Google Scholar]
  38. Neepa, S.F.; Haque, Z.F.; Sabuj, A.A.M.; Islam, M.A.; Saha, S. Serological detection of avian reovirus in different poultry flocks of Gazipur and Mymensingh districts of Bangladesh. Vet. World 2019, 12, 1126–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  39. Chen, R.; Lin, X.F.; Wu, H.Y.; Li, L.N.; Wang, L.; Wang, D.F.; Wu, H.Y.; Guo, P.P.; Mohsin, M.; Yin, G.W. Synergistic Enhancement of Eimeria maxima Vaccine Efficacy Through EF-1α Antigen and Chicken XCL1 Chemokine Adjuvant Combination. Animals 2025, 15, 2330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  40. Pitter, M.R.; Kryczek, I.; Zhang, H.; Nagarsheth, N.; Xia, H.; Wu, Z.; Tian, Y.; Okla, K.; Liao, P.; Wang, W.; et al. PAD4 controls tumor immunity via restraining the MHC class II machinery in macrophages. Cell Rep. 2024, 43, 113942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  41. McManus, E.C.; Campbell, W.C.; Cuckler, A.C. Development of resistance to quinoline coccidiostats under field and laboratory conditions. J. Parasitol. 1968, 54, 1190–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  42. Johnson, J.; Reid, W.M. Anticoccidial drugs: Lesion scoring techniques in battery and floor-pen experiments with chickens. Exp. Parasitol. 1970, 28, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  43. Rohde, C.M.; Destexhe, E.; van der Laan, J.W.; Gould, S.; Coe, R.; Haenen, B. Are Repeat-Dose Toxicity Studies Informative for Safety Assessment of Vaccine Candidates? A Survey of Vaccine Developers. Int. J. Toxicol. 2025, 44, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  44. Momtazi-Borojeni, A.A.; Banach, M.; Tabatabaei, S.A.; Sahebkar, A. Preclinical toxicity assessment of a peptide-based antiPCSK9 vaccine in healthy mice. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2023, 158, 114170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  45. Klátyik, S.; Bohus, P.; Darvas, B.; Székács, A. Authorization and Toxicity of Veterinary Drugs and Plant Protection Products: Residues of the Active Ingredients in Food and Feed and Toxicity Problems Related to Adjuvants. Front. Vet. Sci. 2017, 4, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  46. Györke, A.; Pop, L.; Cozma, V. Prevalence and distribution of Eimeria species in broiler chicken farms of different capacities. Parasite 2013, 20, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  47. Dalloul, R.A.; Lillehoj, H.S. Poultry coccidiosis: Recent advancements in control measures and vaccine development. Expert. Rev. Vaccines 2006, 5, 143–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  48. Shirley, M.W.; Smith, A.L.; Tomley, F.M. The biology of avian Eimeria with an emphasis on their control by vaccination. Adv. Parasitol. 2005, 60, 285–330. [Google Scholar]
  49. De Brabander, P.; Uitterhaegen, E.; Delmulle, T.; De Winter, K.; Soetaert, W. Challenges and progress towards industrial recombinant protein production in yeasts: A review. Biotechnol. Adv. 2023, 64, 108121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  50. Yang, Z.; Zhang, Z. Engineering strategies for enhanced production of protein and bio-products in Pichia pastoris: A review. Biotechnol. Adv. 2018, 36, 182–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  51. Juárez-Estrada, M.A.; Tellez-Isaias, G.; Graham, D.M.; Laverty, L.; Gayosso-Vázquez, A.; Alonso-Morales, R.A. Identification of Eimeria tenella sporozoite immunodominant mimotopes by random phage-display peptide libraries-a proof of concept study. Front. Vet. Sci. 2023, 10, 1223436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  52. Jenkins, M.C. Advances and prospects for subunit vaccines against protozoa of veterinary importance. Vet. Parasitol. 2001, 101, 291–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  53. Zaheer, T.; Abbas, R.Z.; Imran, M.; Abbas, A.; Butt, A.; Aslam, S.; Ahmad, J. Vaccines against chicken coccidiosis with particular reference to previous decade: Progress, challenges, and opportunities. Parasitol. Res. 2022, 121, 2749–2763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  54. Olajide, J.S.; Qu, Z.; Yang, S.; Oyelade, O.J.; Cai, J. Eimeria proteins: Order amidst disorder. Parasites Vectors 2022, 15, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  55. Xu, Q.; Song, X.; Xu, L.; Yan, R.; Shah, M.A.; Li, X. Vaccination of chickens with a chimeric DNA vaccine encoding Eimeria tenella TA4 and chicken IL-2 induces protective immunity against coccidiosis. Vet. Parasitol. 2008, 156, 319–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  56. Ma, D.; Ma, C.; Pan, L.; Li, G.; Yang, J.; Hong, J.; Cai, H.; Ren, X. Vaccination of chickens with DNA vaccine encoding Eimeria acervulina 3-1E and chicken IL-15 offers protection against homologous challenge. Exp. Parasitol. 2011, 127, 208–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  57. Tang, X.; Liu, X.; Yin, G.; Suo, J.; Suo, X. A Novel Vaccine Delivery Model of the Apicomplexan Eimeria tenella Expressing Eimeria maxima Antigen Protects Chickens against Infection of the Two Parasites. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 1982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  58. Blake, D.P.; Billington, K.J.; Copestake, S.L.; Oakes, R.D.; Quail, M.A.; Wan, K.L.; Shirley, M.W.; Smith, A.L.; Sibley, L.D. Genetic Mapping Identifies Novel Highly Protective Antigens for an Apicomplexan Parasite. PLoS Pathog. 2011, 7, e1001279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  59. Jenkins, M.C.; Stevens, L.; O’Brien, C.; Parker, C.; Miska, K.; Konjufca, V. Incorporation of a recombinant Eimeria maxima IMP1 antigen into nanoparticles confers protective immunity against E. maxima challenge infection. Vaccine 2018, 36, 1126–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  60. Pastor-Fernández, I.; Kim, S.; Marugán-Hernández, V.; Soutter, F.; Tomley, F.M.; Blake, D.P. Vaccination with transgenic Eimeria tenella expressing Eimeria maxima AMA1 and IMP1 confers partial protection against high-level E. maxima challenge in a broiler model of coccidiosis. Parasites Vectors 2020, 13, 343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  61. Wang, F.; Peng, Y.; Ye, Z.; Feng, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, J.; Tao, J.; Liu, D. A novel glutathione peroxidase (EnGPX) from Eimeria necatrix contributes to oocyst wall biogenesis and confers protective immunity in chickens. Vet. Parasitol. 2025, 339, 110588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  62. Rafiqi, S.I.; Garg, R.; Ram, H.; Reena, K.K.; Asari, M.; Kumari, P.; Kundave, V.R.; Singh, M.; Banerjee, P.S. Immunoprophylactic evaluation of recombinant gametocyte 22 antigen of Eimeria tenella in broiler chickens. Parasitol. Res. 2019, 118, 945–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  63. Xu, L.; Yu, Z.; He, K.; Wen, Z.; Aleem, M.T.; Yan, R.; Song, X.; Lu, M.; Li, X. PLGA Nanospheres as Delivery Platforms for Eimeria mitis 1a Protein: A Novel Strategy to Improve Specific Immunity. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 901758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  64. Bai, R.; Wang, H.; Guo, J.; Pei, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhu, S.; Lv, C.; Li, J.; Cui, X.; Lv, X. Evaluation of the immunoprotective potential of recombinant EtMIF as a subunit vaccine candidate against Eimeria tenella infection in chickens. Front. Immunol. 2025, 16, 1623743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  65. Alfatly, H.H.; Jarad, N.I. Harnessing bioinformatics and recombinant technology to combat avian coccidiosis: A 19-kDa sporozoite protein-based vaccine. Open Vet. J. 2025, 15, 3598–3607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  66. Huang, J.; Chen, S.; Zhou, Z.; Sun, X.; Haseeb, M.; Lakho, S.A.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, J.; Shah, M.A.A.; Song, X. Poly (D, L-lactide-co-glycolide) delivery system improve the protective efficacy of recombinant antigen TA4 against Eimeria tenella infection. Poult. Sci. 2021, 100, 101083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  67. Juarez-Estrada, M.A.; Tellez-Isaias, G.; Petrone-Garcia, V.M.; Gayosso-Vazquez, A.; Hernandez-Velasco, X.; Alonso-Morales, R.A. Influence of high Eimeria tenella immunization dosages on total oocyst output and specific antibodies recognition response in hybrid pullets (Gallus gallus)—A pilot study. Antibodies 2025, 14, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  68. Holdsworth, P.A.; Conway, D.P.; McKenzie, M.E.; Dayton, A.D.; Chapman, H.D.; Mathis, G.F.; Skinner, J.T.; Mundt, H.C.; Williams, R.B. World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology (WAAVP) guidelines for evaluating the efficacy of anticoccidial drugs in chickens and turkeys. Vet. Parasitol. 2004, 121, 189–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Yu, Z.Q.; Chen, S.Y.; Huang, J.M.; Ding, W.X.; Chen, Y.F.; Su, J.Z.; Yan, R.F.; Xu, L.X.; Song, X.K.; Li, X.R. A multiepitope vaccine encoding four Eimeria epitopes with PLGA nanospheres: A novel vaccine candidate against coccidiosis in laying chickens. Vet. Res. 2022, 53, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  70. da Silva, M.T.L.; Deodato, R.M.; Villar, L.M. Exploring the potential usefulness of IgY for antiviral therapy: A current review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 189, 785–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  71. Lee, S.H.; Lillehoj, H.S.; Park, D.W.; Jang, S.I.; Morales, A.; García, D.; Lucio, E.; Larios, R.; Victoria, G.; Marrufo, D.; et al. Protective effect of hyperimmune egg yolk IgY antibodies against Eimeria tenella and Eimeria maxima infections. Vet. Parasitol. 2009, 163, 123–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  72. Zhu, J.; Paul, W.E. CD4 T cells: Fates, functions, and faults. Blood 2008, 112, 1557–1569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  73. Dalloul, R.A.; Lillehoj, H.S. Recent advances in immunomodulation and vaccination strategies against coccidiosis. Avian Dis. 2005, 49, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  74. Wong, P.; Pamer, E.G. CD8 T cell responses to infectious pathogens. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2003, 21, 29–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  75. Kim, W.H.; Chaudhari, A.A.; Lillehoj, H.S. Involvement of T Cell Immunity in Avian Coccidiosis. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 2732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  76. Hong, Y.H.; Lillehoj, H.S.; Lee, S.H.; Dalloul, R.A.; Lillehoj, E.P. Analysis of chicken cytokine and chemokine gene expression following Eimeria acervulina and Eimeria tenella infections. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2006, 114, 209–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  77. Hong, Y.H.; Lillehoj, H.S.; Lillehoj, E.P.; Lee, S.H. Changes in immune-related gene expression and intestinal lymphocyte subpopulations following Eimeria maxima infection of chickens. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2006, 114, 259–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  78. Moore, K.W.; de Waal Malefyt, R.; Coffman, R.L.; O’Garra, A. Interleukin-10 and the interleukin-10 receptor. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2001, 19, 683–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  79. Liu, S.; Wang, K.; Lin, S.; Zhang, Z.; Cheng, M.; Hu, S.; Hu, H.; Xiang, J.; Chen, F.; Li, G.; et al. Comparison of the Effects between Tannins Extracted from Different Natural Plants on Growth Performance, Antioxidant Capacity, Immunity, and Intestinal Flora of Broiler Chickens. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  80. Chen, R.T.; Hibbs, B. Vaccine Safety: Current and Future Challenges. Pediatr. Ann. 1998, 27, 445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  81. Liu, F.Y.; Guo, R.M.; Zheng, L.; Lu, Y.M.; You, H.; Shuxia, S.; Wang, J.X.; Sun, S.H. Safety evaluation of a canine hepatitis DNA vaccine. Vaccine 2008, 26, 6925–6928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  82. Zálešáková, D.; Novotný, J.; Řiháček, M.; Horáková, L.; Mrkvicová, E.; Šťastník, O.; Pavlata, L. The blood biochemical parameters intervals and dynamics in modern broiler chickens. Vet. Anim. Sci. 2025, 29, 100465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  83. Mizukami, T.; Masumi, A.; Momose, H.; Kuramitsu, M.; Takizawa, K.; Naito, S.; Maeyama, J.; Furuhata, K.; Tsuruhara, M.; Hamaguchi, I.; et al. An improved abnormal toxicity test by using reference vaccine-specific body weight curves and histopathological data for monitoring vaccine quality and safety in Japan. Biol. J. Int. Assoc. Biol. Stand. 2009, 37, 8–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  84. Abdelaziz, K.; Helmy, Y.A.; Yitbarek, A.; Hodgins, D.C.; Sharafeldin, T.A.; Selim, M.S.H. Advances in Poultry Vaccines: Leveraging Biotechnology for Improving Vaccine Development, Stability, and Delivery. Vaccines 2024, 12, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  85. Birhane, N.; Fesseha, H. Vaccine Failure in Poultry Production and its Control Methods—A Review. Biomed. J. Sci. Tech. Res. 2020, 29, 22588–22596. [Google Scholar]
  86. Berezin, V.E.; Bogoyavlenskyi, A.P.; Khudiakova, S.S.; Alexuk, P.G.; Omirtaeva, E.S.; Zaitceva, I.A.; Tustikbaeva, G.B.; Barfield, R.C.; Fetterer, R.H. Immunostimulatory complexes containing Eimeria tenella antigens and low toxicity plant saponins induce antibody response and provide protection from challenge in broiler chickens. Vet. Parasitol. 2010, 167, 28–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
Animals 16 01087 g001
Figure 1. Purification of recombinant TEIN protein. (A) Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate–Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) analysis of purified recombinant TEIN protein. The gel was stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue. (B) Western blotting of the recombinant TEIN protein probed with an anti-His tag primary antibody. Lane M, prestained protein marker; Lane 1, pPIC9K empty vector; Lane 2, purified recombinant TEIN protein.
Figure 1. Purification of recombinant TEIN protein. (A) Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate–Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) analysis of purified recombinant TEIN protein. The gel was stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue. (B) Western blotting of the recombinant TEIN protein probed with an anti-His tag primary antibody. Lane M, prestained protein marker; Lane 1, pPIC9K empty vector; Lane 2, purified recombinant TEIN protein.
Animals 16 01087 g001
Animals 16 01087 g002
Figure 2. Changes in Immunoglobulin Y (IgY) levels in the serum of chickens in each group. Serum IgY concentrations were determined based on Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) at 28 days of age (OD 450 nm). Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 5). Data were analyzed using an unpaired t-test. *** p < 0.001.
Figure 2. Changes in Immunoglobulin Y (IgY) levels in the serum of chickens in each group. Serum IgY concentrations were determined based on Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) at 28 days of age (OD 450 nm). Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 5). Data were analyzed using an unpaired t-test. *** p < 0.001.
Animals 16 01087 g002
Animals 16 01087 g003
Figure 3. The levels of Interleukin-2 (IL-2), Interferon-γ (IFN-γ), and Interleukin-10 (IL-10) in the serum of chickens. The contents of IL-2 (A), IFN-γ (B), and IL-10 (C) in the serum of chickens in each group were detected using ELISA kits. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). Data were analyzed based on two-way ANOVA followed by Šidák’s multiple comparisons test. * p < 0.05 and *** p < 0.001.
Figure 3. The levels of Interleukin-2 (IL-2), Interferon-γ (IFN-γ), and Interleukin-10 (IL-10) in the serum of chickens. The contents of IL-2 (A), IFN-γ (B), and IL-10 (C) in the serum of chickens in each group were detected using ELISA kits. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). Data were analyzed based on two-way ANOVA followed by Šidák’s multiple comparisons test. * p < 0.05 and *** p < 0.001.
Animals 16 01087 g003
Animals 16 01087 g004
Figure 4. The CD4+/CD8+ ratio in the spleen was determined using flow cytometry. The CD4+/CD8+ ratios were determined using flow cytometry after staining with anti-chicken CD3 SPRD, anti-chicken CD4 FITC, and anti-chicken CD8 PE antibodies at the ages of 21 and 28 days. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA followed by Šidák’s multiple comparisons test. *** p < 0.001.
Figure 4. The CD4+/CD8+ ratio in the spleen was determined using flow cytometry. The CD4+/CD8+ ratios were determined using flow cytometry after staining with anti-chicken CD3 SPRD, anti-chicken CD4 FITC, and anti-chicken CD8 PE antibodies at the ages of 21 and 28 days. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA followed by Šidák’s multiple comparisons test. *** p < 0.001.
Animals 16 01087 g004
Animals 16 01087 g005
Figure 5. Histopathological analysis of major organs in chickens. Paraffin-embedded sections (3 μm) of major organs were prepared and examined for pathological changes by conducting Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining (original magnification: 400×). (A) 15 days post-final immunization, (B) 30 days post-final immunization, (C) 60 days post-final immunization.
Figure 5. Histopathological analysis of major organs in chickens. Paraffin-embedded sections (3 μm) of major organs were prepared and examined for pathological changes by conducting Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining (original magnification: 400×). (A) 15 days post-final immunization, (B) 30 days post-final immunization, (C) 60 days post-final immunization.
Animals 16 01087 g005
Table 1. Vaccination strategies and challenge strategies.
Table 1. Vaccination strategies and challenge strategies.
GroupVaccination StrategyChallenge Strategy
Treatment (per Chicken)Vaccination TimeTreatment (per Chicken)Challenge Time
Control————
Challenged group——1 × 104 sporulated oocysts (E. tenella or E. acervulina or E. maxima or E. necatrix or mixed)At 28 days of age
Adjuvant groupAluminum hydroxide adjuvantThe first immunization and the second immunization were performed at 14 and 21 days of age
pPIC9K group100 μg pPIC9K empty protein
TEIN group100 μg TEIN Subunit vaccine
Table 2. Experimental grouping and immunization schedule.
Table 2. Experimental grouping and immunization schedule.
Age GroupsDay 1Day 7Day 14Day 21
Control————
Group A100 μg TEIN———
Group B—100 μg TEIN100 μg TEIN100 μg TEIN
Group C——300 μg TEIN—
Table 3. Protective efficacy of the TEIN subunit vaccine against different species of Eimeria coccidia-infected chickens.
Table 3. Protective efficacy of the TEIN subunit vaccine against different species of Eimeria coccidia-infected chickens.
GroupsChallenge with
Eimeria spp.		Survival Rate (%)Relative Weight Gain Rate (%)Oocyst ValueLesion Score ValueACI
ControlE. tenella10010000200
Challenged group10040.94203684.94
Adjuvant group10042.36203290.36
pPIC9K group10041.22203883.22
TEIN group10089.82114174.82
ControlE. acervulina10010000200
Challenged group10037.38103889.38
Adjuvant group10045.681034101.68
pPIC9K group10040.28103496.28
TEIN group10085.58110174.58
ControlE. maxima10010000200
Challenged group10038.35103890.35
Adjuvant group10040.24103694.24
pPIC9K group10039.46103891.46
TEIN group10085.41110174.41
ControlE. necatrix10010000200
Challenged group10041.24103695.24
Adjuvant group10045.88103897.88
pPIC9K group10041.68103893.68
TEIN group10091.65110.04180.61
ControlMixed10010000200
Challenged group10038.09103890.09
Adjuvant group10039.86103891.86
pPIC9K group10036.26103888.26
TEIN group10086.95110175.95
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ma, X.; Zhang, X.; Li, J.; Gong, P.; Wang, X.; Li, X.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, T.; Cheng, S.; Zhang, N. A Tetravalent Recombinant Subunit Vaccine Provides Protection Against Mixed Challenges with Four Eimeria Species in Chickens. Animals 2026, 16, 1087. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16071087

AMA Style

Ma X, Zhang X, Li J, Gong P, Wang X, Li X, Zhang X, Zhang T, Cheng S, Zhang N. A Tetravalent Recombinant Subunit Vaccine Provides Protection Against Mixed Challenges with Four Eimeria Species in Chickens. Animals. 2026; 16(7):1087. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16071087

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ma, Xiao, Xichen Zhang, Jianhua Li, Pengtao Gong, Xiaocen Wang, Xin Li, Xu Zhang, Tao Zhang, Shuqin Cheng, and Nan Zhang. 2026. "A Tetravalent Recombinant Subunit Vaccine Provides Protection Against Mixed Challenges with Four Eimeria Species in Chickens" Animals 16, no. 7: 1087. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16071087

APA Style

Ma, X., Zhang, X., Li, J., Gong, P., Wang, X., Li, X., Zhang, X., Zhang, T., Cheng, S., & Zhang, N. (2026). A Tetravalent Recombinant Subunit Vaccine Provides Protection Against Mixed Challenges with Four Eimeria Species in Chickens. Animals, 16(7), 1087. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16071087

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop