Effects of Calcareous Marine Algae on Feedlot Performance, Carcass Traits, Nutrient Digestion and Enteric Methane Emissions of Feedlot-Finished Nellore Heifers
Simple Summary
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Experimental Design, Animals, and Housing
2.2. Dietary Treatments
2.3. Feeding Management and Measurements
2.4. Animal Production and Carcass Traits
2.5. Urine and Fecal Sampling
2.6. Apparent Total Tract Digestibility
2.7. Enteric Methane Emission
2.8. Sample Analysis
2.9. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Growth Performance
3.2. Apparent Total Tract Nutrient Digestibility
3.3. Urine and Fecal pH
3.4. Nitrogen Utilization
3.5. Enteric Methane Emissions
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Gerber, P.J. Tackling Climate Change Through Livestock: A Global Assessment of Emissions and Mitigation Opportunities; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO): Rome, Italy, 2013; ISBN 9789251079201. [Google Scholar]
- Associação Brasileira das Indústrias Exportadoras de Carne (ABIEC). Beef Report 2024|Perfil da Pecuária no Brasil; ABIEC: São Paulo, Brazil, 2024; Available online: https://www.abiec.com.br/publicacoes/beef-report-2024-perfil-da-pecuaria-no-brasil/ (accessed on 14 December 2025).
- Mayberry, D.; Bartlett, H.; Moss, J.; Davison, T.; Herrero, M. Pathways to Carbon-Neutrality for the Australian Red Meat Sector. Agric. Syst. 2019, 175, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Roque, B.M.; Venegas, M.; Kinley, R.D.; De Nys, R.; Duarte, T.L.; Yang, X.; Kebreab, E. Red Seaweed (Asparagopsis taxiformis) Supplementation Reduces Enteric Methane by over 80 Percent in Beef Steers. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0247820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Myhre, G.; Shindell, D.; Bréon, F.-M.; Collins, W.; Fuglestvedt, J.; Huang, J.; Koch, D.; Lamarque, J.-F.; Lee, D.; Mendoza, B.; et al. Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing. In Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the IPCC; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2013; pp. 659–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Beauchemin, K.A.; McAllister, T.A.; McGinn, S.M. Dietary Mitigation of Enteric Methane from Cattle. CAB Rev. 2009, 4, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Beauchemin, K.A.; Kreuzer, M.; O’Mara, F.; McAllister, T.A. Nutritional Management for Enteric Methane Abatement: A Review. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 2008, 48, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Knapp, J.R.; Laur, G.L.; Vadas, P.A.; Weiss, W.P.; Tricarico, J.M. Invited Review: Enteric Methane in Dairy Cattle Production: Quantifying the Opportunities and Impact of Reducing Emissions. J. Dairy Sci. 2014, 97, 3231–3261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Hristov, A.N.; Oh, J.; Firkins, J.L.; Dijkstra, J.; Kebreab, E.; Waghorn, G.; Makkar, H.P.S.; Adesogan, A.T.; Yang, W.; Lee, C.; et al. Mitigation of Methane and Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Animal Operations: I. A Review of Enteric Methane Mitigation Options. J. Anim. Sci. 2013, 91, 5045–5069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Callaway, T.R.; Edrington, T.S.; Rychlik, J.L.; Genovese, K.J.; Poole, T.L.; Jung, Y.S.; Bischoff, K.M.; Anderson, R.C.; Nisbet, D.J. Ionophores: Their Use as Ruminant Growth Promotants and Impact on Food Safety. Curr. Issues Intest. Microbiol. 2003, 4, 43–51. [Google Scholar]
- Russell, J.B.; Houlihan, A.J. Ionophore Resistance of Ruminal Bacteria and Its Potential Impact on Human Health. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2003, 27, 65–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- European Union. Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on Additives for Use in Animal Nutrition; European Union: Brussels, Belgium, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Danish Ministry of Food; Agriculture and Fisheries. The Danish Integrated Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring and Research Programme (DANMAP): Consumption of Antimicrobial Agents and Occurrence of Antimicrobial Resistance in Bacteria from Food Animals, Food and Humans in Denmark; Danish Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries: Copenhagen, Denmark, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Durmic, Z.; Moate, P.J.; Eckard, R.; Revell, D.K.; Williams, R.; Vercoe, P.E. In Vitro Screening of Selected Feed Additives, Plant Essential Oils and Plant Extracts for Rumen Methane Mitigation. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2014, 94, 1191–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Cruywagen, C.W.; Taylor, S.; Beya, M.M.; Calitz, T. The Effect of Buffering Dairy Cow Diets with Limestone, Calcareous Marine Algae, or Sodium Bicarbonate on Ruminal pH Profiles, Production Responses, and Rumen Fermentation. J. Dairy Sci. 2015, 98, 5506–5514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Guerreiro, P.; Costa, D.F.A.; Limede, A.C.; Congio, G.F.S.; Meschiatti, M.A.P.; Bernardes, P.A.; Santos, F.A.P. Effects of Monensin, Calcareous Algae, and Essential Oils on Performance, Carcass Traits, and Methane Emissions across Different Breeds of Feedlot-Finished Beef Cattle. Ruminants 2025, 5, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Valadares Filho, S.C.; Detmann, E.; Marcondes, M.I.; Fonseca, M.A.; Souza, M.A. BR-CORTE: Nutrient Requirements of Zebu and Crossbred Cattle, 4th ed.; Suprema: Visconde do Rio Branco, MG, Brazil, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Dolabella, R.H.C. Regulamento Da Inspeção Industrial e Sanitária de Produtos de Origem Animal (RIISPOA); Biblioteca Digital da Câmara dos Deputados: Brasília, DF, Brazil, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Branstad, E.H.; Shouse, C.S.; Dooley, B.C.; Thomas, A.D.; Baumgard, L.H.; Ramirez-Ramirez, H.A. Evaluation of Sam Ple Preparation Methods for the Determination of Fecal PH in Dairy Cows. In Proceedings of the 2017 ADSA Annual Meeting, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 25–28 June 2017; p. 99. [Google Scholar]
- Abeyta, M.A.; Horst, E.A.; Goetz, B.M.; Rodriguez-Jimenez, S.; Mayorga, E.J.; Al-Qaisi, M.; Baumgard, L.H. Effects of Hindgut Acidosis on Inflammation, Metabolism, and Productivity in Lactating Dairy Cows Fed a High-Fiber Diet. J. Dairy Sci. 2023, 106, 2879–2889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Barbosa, A.M.; Valadares, R.F.D.; Valadares Filho, S.C.; Pina, D.S.; Detmann, E.; Leão, M.I. Endogenous Fraction and Urinary Recovery of Purine Derivatives obtained by Different Methods in Nellore Cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 2011, 89, 510–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Chen, X.B.; Gomes, M.J. Estimation of Microbial Protein Supply to Sheep and Cattle Based on Urinary Excretion of Purine Derivatives—An Overview of the Technical Details; Rowett Research Institute: Bucksburn, Aberdeen, UK, 1992; 21p. [Google Scholar]
- Morris, D.L.; Rebelo, L.R.; Dieter, P.A.; Lee, C. Validating Intrinsic Markers and Optimizing Spot Sampling Frequency to Estimate Fecal Outputs. J. Dairy Sci. 2018, 101, 7980–7989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Johnson, K.A.; Johnson, D.E. Methane Emissions from Cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 1995, 73, 2483–2492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Johnson, K.A.; Westberg, H.H.; Michal, J.J.; Cossalman, M.W. The SF6 Tracer Technique: Methane Measurement from Ruminants. In Measuring Methane Production from Ruminants; Makkar, H.P.S., Vercoe, P.E., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2007; pp. 33–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Detmann, E.; Valadares Filho, S.C.; Berchielli, T.T.; Cabral, L.S.; Pina, D.S.; Ladeira, M.M.; Souza, M.A.; Queiroz, A.C.; Saliba, E.O.S.; Azevêdo, J.A.G. Methods for Nutritional Evaluation of Feeds, 2nd ed.; Suprema: Visconde do Rio Branco, MG, Brazil, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Van Soest, P.J. Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant; Cornell University Press: Ithaca, NY, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Neves, T.; Valente, P.; Detmann, E.; De Campos, S.; Filho, V.; Da Cunha, M.; César De Queiroz, A.; Sampaio, C.B. In Situ Estimation of Indigestible Compounds Contents in Cattle Feed and Feces Using Bags Made from Different Textiles. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 2011, 40, 666–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bartels, H.; Böhmer, M.; Heierli, C. Serum Kreatininbestimmung ohne Enteiweissen. Clin. Chim. Acta 1972, 37, 193–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Rossi, C.A.S.; Compiani, R.; Baldi, G.; Taylor, S.J.; Righi, F.; Simoni, M.; Quarantelli, A. Replacing Sodium Bicarbonate with Half Amount of Calcareous Marine Algae in the Diet of Beef Cattle. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 2019, 48, e20180129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Neville, E.W.; Fahey, A.G.; Gath, V.P.; Molloy, B.P.; Taylor, S.J.; Mulligan, F.J. The Effect of Calcareous Marine Algae, with or without Marine Magnesium Oxide, and Sodium Bicarbonate on Rumen pH and Milk Production in Mid-Lactation Dairy Cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2019, 102, 8027–8039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Fulton, W.R.; Klopfenstein, T.J.; Britton, R.A. Adaptation to High Concentrate Diets by Beef Cattle. I. Adaptation to Corn and Wheat Diets. J. Anim. Sci. 1979, 49, 775–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wu, Z.; Bernard, J.K.; Taylor, S.J. Effect of Feeding Calcareous Marine Algae to Holstein Cows Prepartum or Postpartum on Serum Metabolites and Performance. J. Dairy Sci. 2015, 98, 4629–4639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- National Academies of Sciences; Engineering; and Medicine (NASEM). Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle, 8th rev. ed.; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2021; ISBN 978-0-309-67777-6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Erdman, R.A. Dietary Buffering Requirements of the Lactating Dairy Cow: A Review. J. Dairy Sci. 1988, 71, 3246–3266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Dijkstra, J.; Boer, H.; van Bruchem, J.; Bruining, M.; Tamminga, S. Absorption of Volatile Fatty Acids from the Rumen of Lactating Dairy Cows as Influenced by Volatile Fatty Acid Concentration, pH and Rumen Liquid Volume. Br. J. Nutr. 1993, 69, 385–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Lescoat, P.; Sauvant, D. Development of a Mechanistic Model for Rumen Digestion Validated Using the Duodenal Flux of Amino Acids. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 1995, 35, 45–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Russell, J.B.; Wilson, D.B. Why Are Ruminal Cellulolytic Bacteria Unable to Digest Cellulose at Low pH? J. Dairy Sci. 1996, 79, 1503–1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Nagaraja, T.G.; Titgemeyer, E.C. Ruminal Acidosis in Beef Cattle: The Current Microbiological and Nutritional Outlook. J. Dairy Sci. 2007, 90, E17–E38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Owens, F.N.; Secrist, D.S.; Hill, W.J.; Gill, D.R. The Effect of Grain Source and Grain Processing on Performance of Feedlot Cattle: A Review. J. Anim. Sci. 1997, 75, 868–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Russell, J.B.; Hino, T. Regulation of Lactate Production in Streptococcus bovis: A Spiraling Effect That Contributes to Rumen Acidosis. J. Dairy Sci. 1985, 68, 1712–1721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Montañez-Valdez, O.D.; Pinos-Rodríguez, J.M.; Rojo-Rubio, R.; Salinas-Chavira, J.; Martínez-Tinajero, J.J.; Salem, A.Z.M.; Avellaneda-Cevallos, J.H. Effect of a Calcified-Seaweed Extract as Rumen Buffer on Ruminal Disappearance and Fermentation in Steers. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 2012, 82, 430–432. [Google Scholar]
- Lide, D.R. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 76th ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Railsback, L.B. Some Fundamentals of Mineralogy and Geochemistry; University of Georgia: Athens, GA, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Sanchez, W.K. Management and Nutrition of Dairy Cows for Prevention of Metabolic Disorders. In Dairy Nutrition; Van Horn, H.H., Wilcox, C.J., Eds.; CABI Publishing: Wallingford, UK, 2003; pp. 79–98. [Google Scholar]
- Roche, J.R.; Dalley, D.; Moate, P.; Grainger, C.; Rath, M.; O’Mara, F. Dietary Cation-Anion Difference and the Health and Production of Pasture-Fed Dairy Cows. 2. Nonlactating Periparturient Cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2003, 86, 979–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Guyton, A.C.; Hall, J.E. Textbook of Medical Physiology, 13th ed.; Elsevier: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Castillo, A.R.; Kebreab, E.; Beever, D.E.; Barbi, J.H.; Sutton, J.D.; Kirby, H.C.; France, J. The Effect of Protein Supplementation on Nitrogen Utilization in Lactating Dairy Cows Fed Grass Silage Diets. J. Anim. Sci. 2001, 79, 247–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Cooke, R.F.; Eloy, L.R.; Bosco, S.C.; Lasmar, P.V.F.; de Simas, J.M.C.; Leiva, T.; de Medeiros, S.R. An Updated Meta-Analysis of the Anti-Methanogenic Effects of Monensin in Beef Cattle. Transl. Anim. Sci. 2024, 8, txae032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Leng, R.A.; Inthapanya, S.; Preston, T.R. Biochar lowers net methane production from rumen fluid in vitro. Livest. Res. Rural. Dev. 2012, 24, 103. Available online: http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd24/6/sang24103.htm (accessed on 14 December 2025).
- Saleem, A.M.; Ribeiro, G.O.; Yang, W.Z.; Ran, T.; Beauchemin, K.A.; McGeough, E.J.; Ominski, K.H.; Okine, E.K.; McAllister, T.A. Effect of Engineered Biocarbon on Rumen Fermentation, Microbial Protein Synthesis, and Methane Production in an Artificial Rumen (RUSITEC) Fed a High Forage Diet. J. Anim. Sci. 2018, 96, 3121–3130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Moss, A.R.; Jouany, J.-P.; Newbold, C.J. Methane Production by Ruminants: Its Contribution to Global Warming. Ann. Zootech. 2000, 49, 231–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
| Item | Sodium Bicarbonate | Calcareous Marine Algae |
|---|---|---|
| Ingredient, % of DM | ||
| Corn Silage | 25.0 | 25.0 |
| Fine-ground corn | 63.3 | 63.3 |
| Soybean meal | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Feed-grade urea | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Feedlot premix 1 | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Sodium bicarbonate | 1.8 | - |
| Limestone | 0.9 | - |
| Lithothamnium calcareum | - | 0.9 |
| Kaolin 2 | - | 1.8 |
| Chemical composition, % of DM | ||
| DM, % as-fed | 70.67 | 70.74 |
| Crude Protein | 12.66 | 12.76 |
| Starch | 57.83 | 56.62 |
| NDF | 23.17 | 23.44 |
| Ether extract | 3.33 | 3.33 |
| Item | Sodium Bicarbonate | Calcareous Marine Algae | SEM 1 | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feedlot production | ||||
| Initial BW, kg | 268 | 269 | 7.2 | 0.923 |
| Final BW, kg | 368 | 368 | 9.1 | 0.943 |
| Average daily gain, kg | 0.902 | 0.902 | 0.0370 | 0.998 |
| DM intake, kg | 7.26 | 7.16 | 0.342 | 0.780 |
| G:F | 0.126 | 0.129 | 0.0056 | 0.636 |
| Carcass traits | ||||
| HCW, kg | 203 | 202 | 5.2 | 0.934 |
| Dressing, % | 55.7 | 55.5 | 0.45 | 0.729 |
| Item | Sodium Bicarbonate | Calcareous Marine Algae | SEM | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apparent total tract digestibility, % | ||||
| Dry matter | 60.64 | 62.06 | 1.682 | 0.433 |
| Organic matter | 61.97 | 64.23 | 1.659 | 0.211 |
| Starch | 84.87 | 87.89 | 1.268 | 0.106 |
| Neutral detergent fiber | 44.10 | 46.91 | 2.708 | 0.310 |
| Crude protein | 63.15 | 64.77 | 1.249 | 0.184 |
| Item | Treatment | Period | SEM | p-Value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sodium Bicarbonate | Calcareous Marine Algae | Treatment | Period | Treatment × Period | |||
| Urine pH | |||||||
| d 35 | 7.88 | 7.26 | 7.57 a | 0.068 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.052 |
| d 63 | 8.18 | 7.83 | 8.00 b | ||||
| d 91 | 8.26 | 7.91 | 8.09 b | ||||
| Overall | 8.11 | 7.66 | 7.89 | ||||
| Fecal pH | |||||||
| d 35 | 6.16 | 6.12 | 6.14 a | 0.062 | 0.134 | <0.001 | 0.524 |
| d 63 | 5.95 | 5.93 | 5.94 b | ||||
| d 91 | 6.22 | 6.07 | 6.15 a | ||||
| Overall | 6.11 | 6.04 | 6.07 | ||||
| Item | Sodium Bicarbonate | Calcareous Marine Algae | SEM | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N intake, g/day | 147.1 | 145.0 | 6.96 | 0.758 |
| N excretion | ||||
| Fecal, g/day | 54.55 | 48.73 | 3.396 | 0.106 |
| Urinary, g/day | 65.71 | 70.04 | 4.322 | 0.483 |
| Total N excretion, g/day | 119.20 | 121.47 | 6.638 | 0.780 |
| Purine derivatives excretion | ||||
| Allantoin, mmol/day | 93.05 | 83.23 | 9.748 | 0.277 |
| Uric acid, mmol/day | 10.60 | 9.36 | 1.030 | 0.200 |
| Total purine derivatives, mmol/day | 103.6 | 92.6 | 10.77 | 0.269 |
| Microbial protein | ||||
| MCP, g/day | 346.0 | 298.3 | 45.98 | 0.262 |
| Efficiency of microbial protein synthesis | ||||
| g/kg DOM | 47.93 | 41.33 | 7.970 | 0.360 |
| g/kg CP | 361.8 | 307.5 | 60.00 | 0.318 |
| Item | Treatment | Period | SEM | p-Value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sodium Bicarbonate | Calcareous Marine Algae | Treatment | Period | Treatment × Period | |||
| Methane emissions | |||||||
| Production, g/day | |||||||
| d 27 | 144.9 | 134.1 | 139.5 | 8.32 | 0.079 | 0.929 | 0.860 |
| d 55 | 150.3 | 132.5 | 141.4 | ||||
| d 83 | 146.6 | 137.9 | 142.3 | ||||
| Overall | 147.1 | 134.8 | 141.1 | ||||
| Yield (g/kg DM intake) | |||||||
| d 27 | 22.2 | 21.6 | 21.9 | 1.33 | 0.212 | 0.141 | 0.790 |
| d 55 | 21.8 | 19.3 | 20.5 | ||||
| d 83 | 20.4 | 19.1 | 19.7 | ||||
| Overall | 21.4 | 20.0 | 20.7 | ||||
| Intensity (g/kg ADG) | |||||||
| d 27 | 169.6 | 168.8 | 169.2 a | 10.67 | 0.312 | <0.001 | 0.734 |
| d 55 | 174.5 | 166.0 | 170.3 a | ||||
| d 83 | 120.8 | 102.4 | 111.6 b | ||||
| Overall | 155.0 | 145.7 | 150.4 | ||||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Fávero, I.G.; Exposti, A.C.D.; Fávero, F.M.; Souza, J.M.C.d.; Barros Neto, A.P.d.; Boddey, R.M.; Homem, B.G.C.; Machado, L.; Casagrande, D.R.; Batista, E.D. Effects of Calcareous Marine Algae on Feedlot Performance, Carcass Traits, Nutrient Digestion and Enteric Methane Emissions of Feedlot-Finished Nellore Heifers. Animals 2026, 16, 1024. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16071024
Fávero IG, Exposti ACD, Fávero FM, Souza JMCd, Barros Neto APd, Boddey RM, Homem BGC, Machado L, Casagrande DR, Batista ED. Effects of Calcareous Marine Algae on Feedlot Performance, Carcass Traits, Nutrient Digestion and Enteric Methane Emissions of Feedlot-Finished Nellore Heifers. Animals. 2026; 16(7):1024. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16071024
Chicago/Turabian StyleFávero, Igor Gomes, Ana Claudia Degli Exposti, Felipe Martins Fávero, Júlia Mara Campos de Souza, Antonio Pereira de Barros Neto, Robert Michael Boddey, Bruno Grossi Costa Homem, Lorenna Machado, Daniel Rume Casagrande, and Erick Darlisson Batista. 2026. "Effects of Calcareous Marine Algae on Feedlot Performance, Carcass Traits, Nutrient Digestion and Enteric Methane Emissions of Feedlot-Finished Nellore Heifers" Animals 16, no. 7: 1024. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16071024
APA StyleFávero, I. G., Exposti, A. C. D., Fávero, F. M., Souza, J. M. C. d., Barros Neto, A. P. d., Boddey, R. M., Homem, B. G. C., Machado, L., Casagrande, D. R., & Batista, E. D. (2026). Effects of Calcareous Marine Algae on Feedlot Performance, Carcass Traits, Nutrient Digestion and Enteric Methane Emissions of Feedlot-Finished Nellore Heifers. Animals, 16(7), 1024. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16071024

