Next Article in Journal
Probiotic Endophytes for More Sustainable Banana Production
Next Article in Special Issue
Bacillus licheniformis and Bacillus subtilis, Probiotics That Induce the Formation of Macrophage Extracellular Traps
Previous Article in Journal
Phytate and Microbial Suspension Amendments Increased Soybean Growth and Shifted Microbial Community Structure
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Cooperation of Bifidobacterium longum and Active Vitamin D3 on Innate Immunity in Salmonella Colitis Mice via Vitamin D Receptor

1
Department of Pediatrics, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan
2
Department of Pathology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2021, 9(9), 1804; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9091804
Submission received: 18 July 2021 / Revised: 12 August 2021 / Accepted: 17 August 2021 / Published: 25 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Probiotics and Intestinal Health)

Abstract

:
Salmonella spp. remains a major public health problem for the whole world. Intestinal epithelial cells serve as an essential component of the mucosal innate immune system to defend against Salmonella infection. Our in vitro studies showed probiotics and active vitamin D have similar effects on innate immunity in Salmonella-infected intestinal epithelial cells, including antimicrobial peptide and inflammatory responses, to protect the host against infection while downregulating detrimental overwhelming inflammation. Hence, we investigated the synergistic effects of probiotics and active vitamin D on Salmonella colitis and translocation to liver and spleen by in vitro and in vivo studies. The Salmonella colitis model is conducted with 6–8 w/o male C57BL/6 mice: Streptomycin (20 mg/mouse p.o.)-pretreated C57BL/6 mice are mock infected with sterile PBS or infected orally with 1 × 108 CFU of a S. Typhimurium wild-type strain SL1344 for 48 h. The mice in the treated groups received 1, 25D daily (0.2 ug/25 g/d) and/or 1 × 108 CFU of probiotics, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) and Bifidobacterium longum (BL) by intragastric administration for 14 days. The in vivo study demonstrated the combination of probiotic Bifidobacterium longum and active vitamin D3 had the synergistic effects on reducing the severity of Salmonella colitis and body weight loss in C57BL/6 mice by reducing cecal inflammatory mIL-6, mIL-8, mTNF-α and mIL-1β mRNA responses, blocking the translocation of bacteria while enhancing the antimicrobial peptide mhBD-3 mRNA in comparison to the infection only group. However, LGG did not have the same synergistic effects. It suggests the synergistic effects of Bifidobacterium longum and active vitamin D on the antibacterial and anti-inflammatory responses in Salmonella colitis. Therefore, our in vivo studies demonstrated that the combination of probiotic Bifidobacterium longum and active vitamin D3 has the synergistic effects on reducing the severity of Salmonella colitis via the suppression of inflammatory responses, and blocking the translocation of bacteria through the enhancement of antimicrobial peptides.

1. Introduction

Salmonella spp. are important Gram-negative pathogens of humans known to cause a wide variety of diseases ranging from mild diarrhea to severe systemic complications. Salmonella spp. remain a major public health problem for the whole world [1]. Salmonella infection is even more detrimental in the developing world. This century, it has been noticed the incidence of Salmonellosis in humans caused by S. enteritidis or multi-drug-resistant strains of S. typhimurium has increased [2] with similar problems encountered globally [3,4,5,6]. A 5-year prospective study of antibiotic resistance among children hospitalized for acute diarrhea with Salmonella enterica showed high prevalence of resistant strains [7]. In addition, excess mortality was associated with antimicrobial drug-resistant S. typhimurium [8]. Better intervention strategies are needed to reduce the overuse of antimicrobial agents and decrease drug-resistant Salmonellosis.
Following oral infection, the intestinal mucosa serve not only as a barrier to bacteria invasion into the gut, but also integrate the innate immunity of the host by the production of inflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and antimicrobial peptides. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), e.g., human β–defensin-2 (hBD-2), are crucial for host defense against the invasion of Salmonella, while chemokines, e.g., IL-8, recruit neutrophils from the circulation into the subepithelial tissue to cause colitis.
It has been found that the induction of antimicrobial peptide genes’ expression by vitamin D [9] explores the ‘antibiotic’ effect of vitamin D. Increasing research projects have unraveled the important role of vitamin D in the regulation of innate and adaptive immunity [10,11,12]. 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25D3), the active form of vitamin D, induced the expression of two AMPs, hBD-2 and cathelicidin [13,14], in several cultured cells in response to bacterial pathogens. Lower levels of vitamin D were associated with severe illness in sepsis patients [15]. 1,25D3 can significantly enhance the production of AMPs levels to prevent urinary tract infections [16] or reduce the use of antibiotics in patients with frequent respiratory tract infections [17]. Giving vitamin D supplementations to children who had low blood levels of vitamin D decreased their risk of respiratory infections [18]. Thus, supplementation with vitamin D3 could be a new strategy in reducing antibiotic use and may indirectly prevent the development of bacterial resistance. 1,25D3 supplementation was effective in ameliorating acute or chronic colitis, including human and animal studies [19,20]. We recently demonstrated that active vitamin D reduces the severity of Salmonella colitis and invasion in mice by anti-inflammatory and antibacterial effects [21]. Our previous in vitro studies [22,23] also showed that active vitamin D enhances hBD-2 expression in Salmonella-infected intestinal epithelial cells (IECs), so that the host is protected against infection. In addition, the active vitamin D downregulates proinflammatory responses (IL-8 & IL-1β) via the vitamin D receptor (VDR); consequently, the host may escape the detrimental effects of overwhelming inflammation.
Probiotic bacteria are microorganisms that benefit the host through the improvement of the balance of the intestinal microflora and possibly by the augmentation of host defense systems. Probiotics have been shown to have antibacterial activity against Escherichia coli (E. coli) [24]. Clinically, probiotics can be used as an add-on therapy in acute gastroenteritis in children by shortening the duration of diarrhea [25] and hospital stay, resulting in both social and economic benefits. However, the beneficial effect in viral gastroenteritis is not observed in bacterial colitis, though we observed that probiotics could downregulate IL-8 and IL-1β expression in Salmonella-infected IECs [26,27].
Therefore, we investigated the cooperative effect of probiotics and active vitamin D on the severity of Salmonella colitis and invasion in mice by regulating antimicrobial peptides and anti-inflammatory responses.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Strains

The naturally streptomycin-resistant S. enterica serovar Typhimurium (S.Tm) wild-type strain SL1344, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) (ATCC 53103) and Bifidobacterium longum (BL) (ATCC15707) were provided by Food Industry Research and Development Institute (FIRDI, Taipei City 10015, Taiwan).
The naturally streptomycin-resistant S.Tm wild-type strain SL1344, LGG and BL were grown as per manufacturer’s description. The SL1344 were collected using centrifugation at 14,000× g for 5 min, washed with sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and resuspended without antibiotics at a density of 4 × 108 CFU/mL. Solutions of LGG and BL were diluted 1:100 in fresh MRS broth and sub-cultured for 16 h at 37 °C under an anaerobic atmosphere, washed and resuspended to final concentration 108 CFU/mL.

2.2. 1,25(OH)2D3 Treatment

1,25D3 was dissolved in corn oil to the final concentration of 30 mg/mL, and the mice were treated via oral gavage with active vitamin D3 (1,25D3) (0.2 μg/25 g mice) daily. The control mice were fed with the corresponding amount of ethanol diluted in corn oil.

2.3. Animal Experiments

All mice were generously provided by National Laboratory Animal Center. Forty-two six to eight week old female C57BL/6 mice specific-pathogen–free mice were fed in SPF room in Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital animal center. Animal experiments were approved by the Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee according to the legal requirements (Approval No. 2016122117, 21 February 2017). For the experiments, the mice were housed in individually ventilated cages and transferred to negative pressure room. Mice were divided into seven groups: NA (Open control); VD (vitamin D3 only); S.Tm (Comparison group); LGG (LGG only); VD+LGG (vitamin D3 and LGG); BL (BL only); VD+BL (vitamin D3 and BL).
Before induction of the colitis, mice were oral gavage given vitamin D3 0.2 μg/25 g mice (VD group) or 108 CFU probiotics (LGG and BL group) or both vitamin D3 and probiotics (VD+LGG and VD+BL group) for 4 days. The other groups were fed 100 μL sterile water (Open control) or 100 μL PBS (S.Tm group).
Water and food were withdrawn 3 h before treatment with 20 mg streptomycin (100 μL sterile water for open control) per oral gavage. Then, animals were supplied with water and food at will. Then, 24 h after streptomycin treatment, food and water were withdrawn again for 3 h and infected with S. enterica serovar Typhimurium SL1344 108 CFU (suspended in 100 μL PBS) or treated with sterile water (100 μL sterile water for open control). The food and water were supplied at will again. Then, 48 h after infection, the mice were again treated with vitamin D3 0.2 μg/25 g mice (VD group) or 108 CFU probiotics (LGG and BL group) or both vitamin D3 and probiotics (VD+LGG and VD+BL group) for 7 days. Other groups were fed 100 μL sterile water (Open control) or 100 μL PBS (S.Tm group). On day 14, we collected the submandibular bleeding by using lancets. Then, mice were sacrificed by CO2 narcosis and their intestinal tracts, spleen, and liver were removed, weighed, flushed with ice-cold PBS, and cut. Tissues were treated for further analysis.

2.4. Analysis of S.Tm Loads in the Spleens and Livers

All the tissues removed from mice were removed aseptically, weighed and recorded. To analyze the colonization of bacteria, the liver and spleen were homogenized in 4 °C cold PBS with 1% triton X-100 using a Potter homogenizer; using a micropestle to mince the tissue as much as possible. To determine the numbers of S.Tm colonized, the numbers of CFU were determined by plating appropriate dilutions on MacConkey agar plates (with 50 μg/mL streptomycin) cultured for 16 h at 37 °C under mild aeration. The minimal detectable values were 20 CFU/organ in the spleen and 100 CFU/organ in the liver.

2.5. Histological Colitis Scoring

Postmortem, the entire colon was removed, and the colon length and weight were measured. Segments of the cecum and colon were fixed and embedded in paraffin according to the standard procedures. Alternatively, tissue samples were embedded, snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80 °C. Part of the cecum was harvested, fixed in 10% formalin, processed, and embedded in paraffin according to the standard protocol. Cryosections (5 μm) were mounted on glass slides, air-dried for 2 h at room temperature, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H & E). Histological scoring was performed in a blinded fashion by a trained pathologist, with a combined score for submucosal edema (score, 0–3), epithelial integrity (score, 0–3), number of goblet cells (score, 0–3) and polymorphonuclear leukocytes in the lamina propria (score, 0–4) [28]. The combined pathological score for each tissue sample was determined as the sum of these scores; it ranges between 0 and 13 arbitrary units and indicates the levels of inflammation in the cecum.
The diarrhea situation was scored as follows: 5 = Mice alive and energetic; 4 = Mice experiencing diarrhea and pasty stools; 3 = Mice experiencing loose stools and reduced mobility; 2 = Mice alive but weak and experiencing abnormal behavior; 1 = Mice lost their lives.

2.6. Quantitative Real-Time PCR Analysis of Cecum RNA

Samples of the cecum were obtained, immediately snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80 °C. Total RNA was extracted from the cecum tissue or infected cultured cells, using TRI Reagent (Ambio #15596018, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) and Directzol RNA MiniPrep kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA by using PrimeScriptTM RT reagent Kit (TaKaRaCat #RR037A, San Jose, CA, USA) in a 20 μL reaction volume with a final concentration of 1 μg total RNA. Then, cDNA samples were subjected to quantitative real time PCR using ABI 7500 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystem) and FAST SYBR GREEN MASTER MIX (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA)according to the manufacturer’s directions.
Primers (Genomics, New Taipei City, Taiwan) for the genes that we interested in and internal reference were as follows: Beta-actin (β-actin): forward, 5′-TGT CGA GTC GCG TCC ACC-3′, reverse, 5′-TCG TCA TCC ATG GCG AAC TGG-3′; VDR: forward, 5′-ACCCTGGTGACTTTGACCG-3′, reverse, 5′-GGCAATCTCCATTGAAGGGG-3′; Chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 2(CXCL2): forward, 5′-GCCCAGACAGAAGTCATAGCC-3′, reverse, 5′-GCTCCTCCTTTCCAGGTCAG-3′; Mouse beta defensin-3 (mBD-3, analog of hBD-2): forward, 5′-GCATTGGCAACACTCGTCAGA-3′, reverse, 5′-CGGGATCTTGGTCTTCTCTA-3′; Interleukin 1 beta (IL-1β): forward, 5′-AGCTTCCTTGTGCAAGTGTC-3, reverse, 5′-TTGGGGTCCGTCAACTTCAA-3′; Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha (TNFα): 5′-CTCCAGGCGGTGCCTATGTC-3′, reverse, 5′-CCATTTGGGAACTTCTCATCCCTTT-3′; Interleukin 6 (IL-6): forward, 5′-GTTCCTCTCTGCAAGAGACTTC-3′, reverse, 5′-AGTCTCCTCTCCGGACTTGT-3′.
We used the ABI 7500 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystem) to set up the reactions. The reaction protocol was set as below. The denaturation step was set up at 95 °C for 1 min, primer annealing step was set at 54 °C for 1 min and the extension step was set at 72 °C for 2 min. These three steps were repeated for 25–35 cycles. The threshold cycle (Ct), which represented the duplication cycle number, was determined by the fluorescent value in the exponential phase of the amplification. The ABI7500 software (SDS V2.3) was used to obtain raw fluorescence data (Rn and DRn) for analysis. The relative number of transcripts was normalized to the amount of β-actin transcript by subtracting the mean Ct value of the latter from the mean Ct value of the former for each experimental condition. The difference between the normalized Ct values of the infected cells and the control cells is a measure of the change in mRNA expression. Many aspects of the MIQE guidelines were taken into consideration for the methods and analysis [29].

2.7. RNA Interference (RNAi) in Cultured Cells

RNAi experiments in cultured cells were performed as described previously [30,31,32]. Briefly, cultured SW480 cells were transfected with VDR siRNA according to the manufacturer’s protocol to knockdown VDR expression. After transfection, the cultured cells were infected by SL1344 with or without treatment of vitamin D or BL. Then, total RNA was extracted from the cells and number analyzed for mRNA expression.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

All the above experiments were performed in triplicate with similar results. We made use of GraphPad Prism 8 software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) to performed the statistical analysis. For three or more nonparametric variables, we used Kruskal–Wallis one-way ANOVA to determine the variance. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. In Vivo Study

3.1.1. Combination of Bifidobacterium Longum and Active 1,25D3 Attenuates the Severity of Salmonella Colitis in Mice

To study the effects of combined 1,25D3 and probiotics on the severity of Salmonella colitis, we investigated the cecal pathology of infected WT mice in the presence or absence of 1,25D3 or probiotics treatment. Consistent with our previous study [21], we observed obvious pathological changes in the H&E-stained cecum sections from the infected WT mice 48 h post-infection in Figure 1C. In contrast, the combination of BL and VD significantly attenuates the severity of Salmonella colitis from the histopathological analysis of cecum. Using the histological scoring, the severity of Salmonella colitis was decreased more significantly in the BL-VD combination-treated groups than in the infection-only WT mice (Figure 1D).
In Figure 1, we observed that the combination of BL and 1,25D3 synergistically reduced the severity of Salmonella colitis, including body weight loss, situation of conditions and pathologic scores, in C57BL/6 mice, but LGG had no significantly synergistic effect.

3.1.2. Combination of 1,25D3 and Bifidobacterium longum Exerts Cecal Anti-Inflammatory Responses and Antimicrobial Peptide in Salmonella Colitis Mice

To investigate the effects of combination of Bifidobacterium logum and 1,25D3 on the inflammatory and antimicrobial peptide responses in Salmonella-infected mice, the gene expression of cytokines and antimicrobial peptide was quantified using real-time PCR in the cecal tissue of Salmonella-infected mice with or without treatment of 1,25D3 or probiotics. Cecal gene expression of mIL-6, mIL-8, mIL-1β and mTNF-α, and mBD-3 (Figure 2) were significantly increased in Salmonella-infected mice. In contrast, mIL-8, mIL-1β and mTNF-α were synergistically suppressed in the cecal tissue of Salmonella colitis mice treated with a combination of 1,25D3 and Bifidobacterium longum, whereas mBD-3 was synergistically enhanced.
We observed that a combination of BL and 1,25D3 reduced cecal mIL-6 (23.87 ± 7.06 vs. 64.00 ± 21.93, p < 0.05), mIL-8 (203.50 ± 53.74 vs. 491.70 ± 59.72, p < 0.005), mIL-1beta (58.21 ± 12.01 vs. 271.00 ± 21.96, p < 0.01) and mTNF-alpha (42.82 ± 7.77 vs. 71.88 ± 14.72, p < 0.005) but increased mBD-3 mRNA (18.32 ± 3.30 vs. 8.00 ± 0.47, p < 0.005) expressions. Furthermore, the combination of BL and 1,25D3 increased VDR mRNA expression.
Altogether, it suggests combined Bifidobacterium longum and active vitamin D has synergistic effects on the severity of Salmonella colitis by enhancing antibacterial and anti-inflammatory effects, as well as highlighting the possible role of VDR in the synergistic effects.

3.1.3. Combination of 1,25D3 and Bifidobacterium Longum Exerted Reduction of Bacterial Translocation in Salmonella-Infected Mice

Khailova et al. [33] showed that 1,25D3 can reduce mortality and systemic bacterial translocation in experimental sepsis in weanling mice and decrease bacterial translocation into the liver and spleen in Salmonella colitis mice model [21]. To further determine the impact of the combination of probiotics and 1,25D3 treatment on tissue bacterial loads, liver and spleen were collected from Salmonella-infected mice treated with probiotics and/or active 1,25D3, homogenized and plated on LB plates. The CFU were determined. It was revealed that the combination of active 1,25D3 and probiotic Bifidobacterium longum treatment exerted reduction of bacterial loads in liver of Salmonella-infected mice (Figure 3).
Altogether, the above in vivo study demonstrated the combination of probiotic Bifidobacterium longum and active vitamin D3 reduced the severity of Salmonella colitis by their synergistic effects on the suppression of inflammatory responses, and blocking the translocation of bacteria by enhancing antimicrobial peptide.

3.2. In Vitro Study

3.2.1. Combination of Bifidobacterium Longum and 1,25D3 Exerted Synergistic Effect on Vitamin D Receptor mRNA Expression in Salmonella-Infected SW480 Cells

In World J. Gastroenterol. [23], we demonstrated that active vitamin D enhanced VDR mRNA and protein expressions in Salmonella-infected intestinal epithelial cells (IECs). To investigate the regulatory effects of Bifidobacterium longum and active vitamin D on vitamin D receptor (VDR) mRNA expression in IECs infected by Salmonella, the cultured SW480 cells were infected by SL1344 after treatment with Bifidobacterium longum, 1,25D3 or combination of both. Total RNA was extracted and analyzed for VDR mRNA expression by real-time quantitative PCR.
As shown in Figure 4, Salmonella infection induced VDR mRNA expression (normalized to GAPDH) in SW480 cells, which was synergistically enhanced by combination of Bifidobacterium longum and 1,25D3. Knockdown of VDR by siRNA counteracted the synergistic effect of the combination.

3.2.2. The Synergistic Effect of Bifidobacterium Longum on Vitamin D-Induced mRNA Expression Is Dependent on VDR

To further verify the role of VDR on the synergistic effects of Bifidobacterium longum on vitamin D-induced inflammatory responses and AMPs, we adapted a siRNA knock-down approach for VDR. Knockdown of VDR was confirmed by Western blot with specific siRNA in SW480 cells up to 48 h previously [23]. siRNA-transfected SW480 cells were untreated or treated with vitamin D3 alone or in combination with Bifidobacterium longum and vitamin D3 for 6 h. Following the knockdown of VDR, we detected that the synergistic effect of Bifidobacterium longum on vitamin D3 -induced IL-8, IL-1β, TNF-α and hBD-2 mRNA expression in SW480 cells was almost completely diminished in VDR-silenced cells (Figure 5), but not in control siRNA-silenced cells (data not shown). Therefore, specific suppression by siRNA targeting VDR diminished the synergistic effect of Bifidobacterium longum on vitamin D3 -induced IL-8, IL-1β, TNF-α and hBD-2 mRNA expression.

4. Discussion

It has been demonstrated [19] that 1,25D3 was effective in ameliorating DSS-induced acute colitis by enhancing epithelial cell resistance to injury and suppressing proinflammatory responses to luminal antigens. Based on our recent study demonstrating the benefit of active vitamin D on Salmonella colitis [21] and probiotics on gastroenteritis and E. coli infection [24,25], it is reasonable and promising to investigate the benefits of combining both supplements to treat Salmonella colitis. However, to our knowledge, there is no such report in the literature. Daily supplements of the probiotic strain Lactobacillus reuteri NCIMB 30242 increased the mean circulating vitamin D levels by 25% [34]. It suggests the synergistic benefits of probiotics and vitamin D to protect against a range of serious health problems and provide an effective treatment option for colitis. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials [35] revealed co-supplementation of vitamin D and probiotics generated greater health benefits than its comparators did in nearly all studies, including coronary heart disease, gestational diabetes, infantile colic, osteopenia, polycystic ovarian syndrome, schizophrenia, and type 2 diabetes. Our in vivo study demonstrated the combination of probiotic BL and active vitamin D3 had synergistic effects on reducing Salmonella colitis by the suppression of inflammatory responses, and blocking the translocation of bacteria.
Why are the synergistic effects of BL better than LGG when they are in combination with active vitamin D? One clear difference between Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium is that Bifidobacterium reside mainly in the colon while Lactobacillus strains are mainly found in the small intestine. Although treatment with probiotics usually has a positive effect in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), four clinical trials using different Lactobacillus strains failed to show any reduction in IBS symptoms over placebo [36]. BL was partly superior to other species of Lactobacillus for the treatment of post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome [36]. Moreover, seventy-seven subjects with IBS were randomized to receive either Lactobacillus or Bifidobacterium for 8 weeks [37]. B. infantis 35624 alleviates symptoms in IBS, superior to Lactobacillus salivarius UCC4331, which is similar to another study by O’Sullivan and O’Morain [38] who failed to detect an effect of LGG on overall symptomatology. Bifidobacterium is reported to be able to modify the gut microbiota by producing organic acids, such as butyrate acid, and competitively adhering to the mucosa and epithelium [39]; therefore, it has a great ability to colonize the intestine. By producing organic acids, Bifidobacterium longum ATCC 15707 also has the ability to repress Clostridium difficile infection [40] and reduce the severity of chemical colitis on rats [41]. The selection of strains from of the L. rhamnosus group is a special field of probiotic research [42]. Since L. casei and L. rhamnosus strains are transient organisms in the intestine, BL has been preferred because it has fewer demanding requirements for anaerobic conditions in foods and in pharmaceuticals. Therefore, our study suggests that specific strains of probiotics should be chosen according to the involved segment of intestine. For example, Lactobacillus should be used in diseases of the small intestine, while Bifidobacterium is beneficial for colonic diseases.
Our recent studies [22,23] observed that active vitamin D enhanced hBD-2 in Salmonella-infected IECs to protect the host against infection, while it downregulated proinflammatory responses (IL-8 & IL-1β) to prevent the host from the detrimental effects of overwhelming inflammation [22,23]. Probiotic bacteria are microorganisms that benefit the host through the improvement of the balance of intestinal microflora and possibly by augmentation of host defense systems. Lactic acid bacteria, LGG and B. bifidum, enhance autophagic ability of mononuclear phagocytes [43] as well as production of enterocyte β–defensin 2 via many signaling pathways [44,45]. Defensins disrupt the integrity of the bacterial cell membrane, resulting in the death of the microbe. Enteric defensins are essential regulators of homeostatic commensal microbiota [46]. Spontaneous colitis developing in mice with defective expression of defensins is associated with increased commensal bacterial translocation [47]. Additionally, our team observed that probiotics suppress IL-1beta expression in Salmonella-infected IECs [27]. Accordingly, we observed decreased Salmonella translocation in liver and spleen by probiotic BL or active vitamin D, significantly by the combination of both. We also demonstrated that the combination of probiotic and active vitamin D synergistically increase antimicrobial peptide hBD-2 but decrease inflammatory responses including IL-1β, Il-8, IL-6 and TNF-α. It suggests that combination of probiotic and active vitamin D may enhance bacterial killing by β-defensin and lessen detrimental inflammation-induced translocation of the bacteria.
VDR-defect mice are much more susceptible to mucosal injury, leading to extensive ulceration and early death [48]. VDR-defective mice were hyper-responsive to exogenously injected LPS. Moreover, chemical-induced colitis in the VDR knockout mice was accompanied by high colonic expression of inflammation, including TNF-α, IL-1α, IL-1β and IL-8, leading to weight loss, ulceration and perforation of the bowel, endotoxemia and increased mortality [49]. Our in vitro study observed that 1,25D3 reduces Salmonella-induced IL-8 and IL-1β but enhances VDR expression in IECs [22]. Besides 1,25D3 attenuates the severity of Salmonella colitis by downregulating inflammatory responses [21]. It suggests that VDR may play an anti-inflammatory role in Salmonella colitis. Oral supplementation of probiotics has been observed to increase serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D in a human study [34]. Furthermore, probiotics can potentially affect the uptake of VDR by enterocytes [50], enhancing its expression and activity [51]. The colonization of commensal bacteria (or probiotics) in the intestine may orchestrate their interaction with VDR by affecting both the distribution and expression of VDR in IECs [52]. Probiotics could increase VDR signaling and inhibit infection-induced inflammation in both human and mouse IECs [53]. The authors conclude that the VDR pathway is required for probiotic protection in Salmonella colitis and also detected that probiotics increased the expression of the VDR target genes, such as antimicrobial peptides at the transcriptional level. We also demonstrated that probiotics exert anti-inflammatory (IL-8 and IL-1β) and antibacterial (hBD-2) effects in Salmonella-infected IECs [26] with the involvement of VDR [27]. Compatible with these findings, we demonstrated the combination of probiotic and active vitamin D synergistically enhanced VDR mRNA expression in Salmonella colitis mice, contributing to the synergistic effects of the combination on anti-inflammation and antimicrobial peptides by in vitro study. Thus, co-supplementation with probiotic and vitamin D3 could provide a new and promising strategy to reduce antibiotic use and hence prevent the emerging epidemic of bacterial resistance.

5. Conclusions

Our in vivo study demonstrated that the combination of probiotic B. longum strain ATCC15707 with active vitamin D3 has a synergistic effect on reducing the severity of Salmonella colitis by the suppression of inflammatory responses, and blocking the translocation of Salmonella through the enhancement of antimicrobial peptides, with the involvement of VDR by in vitro study, whereas the L. rhamnosus GG strain ATCC53103 does not. The combination of probiotics and vitamin D could be an alternative treatment for Salmonella colitis and lessen the overuse of antibiotics. However, specific strains should be investigated to see their effects on vitamin D-mediated innate immunity in different diseases.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the research, analyzed the data, writing—original draft preparation, F.-C.H.; review and editing, S.-C.H.; funding acquisition, F.-C.H. Both authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Ministry of Science and Technology grant number MOST 107-2314-B-182-046-MY2 and Chang Gung Memorial Hospital grand number CMRPG8H0681 and CMRPG8K0421.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Animal experiments were approved by the Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee according to the legal requirements (Approval No. 2016122117, 21 February 2017).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We thank Yi-Lee for her technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pang, T.; Bhutta, Z.A.; Finlay, B.B.; Altwegg, M. Typhoid fever and other salmonellosis: A continuing challenge. Trends Microbiol. 1995, 3, 253–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Glynn, M.K.; Bopp, C.; Dewitt, W.; Mokhtar, M.; Angulo, F.J. Emergence of multidrug-resistant Salmonella enterica serotype typhimurium DT104 infections in the United States. N. Engl. J. Med. 1998, 338, 1333–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Rodrigue, D.C.; Tauxe, R.V.; Rowe, B. International increase in Salmonella enteritidis: A new pandemic? Epidemiol. Infect. 1990, 105, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Threlfall, E.J.; Fisher, I.S.; Berghold, C.; Gerner-Smidt, P.; Tschäpe, H.; Cormican, M.; Luzzi, I.; Schnieder, F.; Wannet, W.; Machado, J.; et al. Antimicrobial drug resistance in isolates of Salmonella enterica from cases of salmonellosis in humans in Europe in 2000: Results of international multi-centre surveillance. Euro. Surveill. 2003, 8, 41–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Su, L.H.; Wu, T.L.; Chia, J.H.; Chu, C.; Kuo, A.J.; Chiu, C.H. Increasing ceftriaxone resistance in Salmonella isolates from a university hospital in Taiwan. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2005, 55, 846–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Lauderdale, T.L.; Aarestrup, F.M.; Chen, P.C.; Lai, J.F.; Wang, H.Y.; Shiau, Y.R.; Huang, I.W.; Hung, C.L. Multidrug resistance among different serotypes of clinical Salmonella isolates in Taiwan. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2006, 55, 149–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Chiappini, E.; Galli, L.; Pecile, P.; Martino, M.D. Results of a 5-year prospective surveillance study of antibiotic resistance among Salmonella enterica isolates and ceftriaxone therapy among children hospitalized for acute diarrhea. Clin. Ther. 2002, 24, 1585–1594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Helms, M.; Vastrup, P.; Gerner-Smidt, P.; Mølbak, K. Excess mortality associated with antimicrobial drug-resistant Salmonella typhimurium. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2002, 8, 490–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, P.T.; Stenger, S.; Li, H.; Wenzel, L.; Tan, B.H.; Krutzik, S.R.; Ochoa, M.T.; Schauber, J.; Wu, K.; Meinken, C.; et al. Toll-like receptor triggering of a vitamin D-mediated human antimicrobial response. Science 2006, 311, 1770–1773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. White, J.H. Vitamin D signaling, infectious diseases, and regulation of innate immunity. Infect. Immun. 2008, 76, 3837–3843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Gubatan, J.; Moss, A.C. Vitamin D in inflammatory bowel disease: More than just a supplement. Curr. Opin. Gastroenterol. 2018, 34, 217–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kellermann, L.; Jensen, K.B.; Bergenheim, F.; Gubatan, J.; Chou, N.D.; Moss, A.; Nielsen, O.H. Mucosal vitamin D signaling in inflammatory bowel disease. Autoimmun. Rev. 2020, 19, 102672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Gubatan, J.; Mehigan, G.A.; Villegas, F.; Mitsuhashi, S.; Longhi, M.S.; Malvar, G.; Csizmadia, E.; Robson, S.; Moss, A.C. Cathelicidin Mediates a Protective Role of Vitamin D in Ulcerative Colitis and Human Colonic Epithelial Cells. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2020, 26, 885–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, T.T.; Dabbas, B.; Laperriere, D.; Bitton, A.J.; Soualhine, H.; Tavera-Mendoza, L.E.; Dionne, S.; Servant, M.J.; Bitton, A.; Seidman, E.G.; et al. Direct and indirect induction by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 of the NOD2/CARD15-defensin beta2 innate immune pathway defective in Crohn disease. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 2227–2231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Jeng, L.; Yamshchikov, A.V.; Judd, S.E.; Blumberg, H.M.; Martin, G.S.; Ziegler, T.R.; Tangpricha, V. Alterations in vitamin D status and anti-microbial peptide levels in patients in the intensive care unit with sepsis. J. Transl. Med. 2009, 7, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Hertting, O.; Holm, A.; Luthje, P.; Brauner, H.; Dyrdak, R.; Jonasson, A.F.; Wiklund, P.; Chromek, M.; Brauner, A. Vitamin D induction of the human antimicrobial Peptide cathelicidin in the urinary bladder. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e15580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Bergman, P.; Norlin, A.C.; Hansen, S.; Rekha, R.S.; Agerberth, B.; Björkhem-Bergman, L.; Ekström, L.; Lindh, J.D.; Andersson, J. Vitamin D3 supplementation in patients with frequent respiratory tract infections: A randomised and double-blind intervention study. BMJ Open 2012, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Camargo, C.A., Jr.; Ganmaa, D.; Frazier, A.L.; Kirchberg, F.F.; Stuart, J.J.; Kleinman, K.; Sumberzul, N.; Rich-Edwards, J.W. Randomized trial of vitamin D supplementation and risk of acute respiratory infection in Mongolia. Pediatrics 2012, 130, e561–e567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Zhao, H.; Zhang, H.; Wu, H.; Li, H.; Liu, L.; Guo, J.; Li, C.; Shih, D.Q.; Zhang, X. Protective role of 1,25(OH)2 vitamin D3 in the mucosal injury and epithelial barrier disruption in DSS-induced acute colitis in mice. BMC Gastroenterol. 2012, 12, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Nicholson, I.; Dalzell, A.M.; El-Matary, W. Vitamin D as a therapy for colitis: A systematic review. J. Crohns. Colitis. 2012, 6, 405–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Huang, F.C.; Huang, S.C. Active vitamin D3 attenuates the severity of Salmonella colitis in mice by orchestrating innate immunity. Immun. Inflamm. Dis. 2021, 9, 481–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Huang, F.C. The differential effects of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 on Salmonella-induced interleukin-8 and human beta-defensin-2 in intestinal epithelial cells. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2016. [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Huang, F.C. Vitamin D differentially regulates Salmonella-induced intestine epithelial autophagy and interleukin-1beta expression. World J. Gastroenterol. 2016, 22, 10353–10363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Coconnier, M.H.; Lievin, V.; Bernet-Camard, M.F.; Hudault, S.; Servin, A.L. Antibacterial effect of the adhering human Lactobacillus acidophilus strain LB. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1997, 41, 1046–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Allen, S.J.; Okoko, B.; Martinez, E.; Gregorio, G.; Dans, L.F. Probiotics for treating infectious diarrhoea. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2004, CD003048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Huang, F.C.; Huang, S.C. The different effects of probiotics treatment on Salmonella-induced interleukin-8 response in intestinal epithelia cells via PI3K/Akt and NOD2 expression. Benef. Microbes 2016, 7, 739–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Lai, W.T.; Huang, F.C. Probiotics exert reciprocal effects on autophagy and interleukin-1beta expression in Salmonella-infected intestinal epithelial cells via autophagy-related 16L1 protein. Benef. Microbes 2019, 10, 913–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Barthel, M.; Hapfelmeier, S.; Quintanilla-Martinez, L.; Kremer, M.; Rohde, M.; Hogardt, M.; Pfeffer, K.; Rüssmann, H.; Hardt, W.D. Pretreatment of mice with streptomycin provides a Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium colitis model that allows analysis of both pathogen and host. Infect. Immun. 2003, 71, 2839–2858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Bustin, S.A.; Benes, V.; Garson, J.A.; Hellemans, J.; Huggett, J.; Kubista, M.; Mueller, R.; Nolan, T.; Pfaffl, M.W.; Shipley, G.L.; et al. The MIQE guidelines: Minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. Clin. Chem. 2009, 55, 611–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Kammanadiminti, S.J.; Chadee, K. Suppression of NF-kappaB activation by Entamoeba histolytica in intestinal epithelial cells is mediated by heat shock protein 27. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 26112–26120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Huang, F.C. Plasma membrane cholesterol plays a critical role in the Salmonella-induced anti-inflammatory response in intestinal epithelial cells. Cell Immunol. 2011, 271, 480–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Huang, F.C. Regulation of Salmonella flagellin-induced interleukin-8 in intestinal epithelial cells by muramyl dipeptide. Cell Immunol. 2012, 278, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Khailova, L.; Frank, D.N.; Dominguez, J.A.; Wischmeyer, P.E. Probiotic administration reduces mortality and improves intestinal epithelial homeostasis in experimental sepsis. Anesthesiology 2013, 119, 166–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Jones, M.L.; Martoni, C.J.; Prakash, S. Oral supplementation with probiotic L. reuteri NCIMB 30242 increases mean circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D: A post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2013, 98, 2944–2951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Abboud, M.; Rizk, R.; AlAnouti, F.; Papandreou, D.; Haidar, S.; Mahboub, N. The Health Effects of Vitamin D and Probiotic Co-Supplementation: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. Nutrients 2020, 13, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, H.; Gong, J.; Wang, W.; Long, Y.; Fu, X.; Fu, Y.; Qian, W.; Hou, X. Are there any different effects of Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus and Streptococcus on intestinal sensation, barrier function and intestinal immunity in PI-IBS mouse model? PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e90153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. O‘Mahony, L.; McCarthy, J.; Kelly, P.; Hurley, G.; Luo, F.; Chen, K.; O’Sullivan, G.C.; Kiely, B.; Collins, J.K.; Shanahan, F.; et al. Lactobacillus and bifidobacterium in irritable bowel syndrome: Symptom responses and relationship to cytokine profiles. Gastroenterology 2005, 128, 541–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. O‘Sullivan, M.A.; O‘Morain, C.A. Bacterial supplementation in the irritable bowel syndrome. A randomised double-blind placebo-controlled crossover study. Dig. Liver Dis. 2000, 32, 294–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Singh, N.; Arioli, S.; Wang, A.; Villa, C.R.; Jahani, R.; Song, Y.S.; Mora, D.; Guglielmetti, S.; Comelli, E.M. Impact of Bifidobacterium bifidum MIMBb75 on mouse intestinal microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2013, 85, 369–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Yun, B.; Song, M.; Park, D.J.; Oh, S. Beneficial Effect of Bifidobacterium longum ATCC 15707 on Survival Rate of Clostridium difficile Infection in Mice. Korean J. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 2017, 37, 368–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Celiberto, L.S.; Bedani, R.; Dejani, N.N.; de Medeiros, A.I.; Zuanon, J.A.S.; Spolidorio, L.C.; Adorno, M.A.T.; Varesche, M.B.A.; Galvão, F.C.; Valentini, S.R.; et al. Effect of a probiotic beverage consumption (Enterococcus faecium CRL 183 and Bifidobacterium longum ATCC 15707) in rats with chemically induced colitis. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0175935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Tannock, G.W.; Munro, K.; Harmsen, H.J.; Welling, G.W.; Smart, J.; Gopal, P.K. Analysis of the fecal microflora of human subjects consuming a probiotic product containing Lactobacillus rhamnosus DR20. Appl Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66, 2578–2588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Ghadimi, D.; de Vrese, M.; Heller, K.J.; Schrezenmeir, J. Lactic acid bacteria enhance autophagic ability of mononuclear phagocytes by increasing Th1 autophagy-promoting cytokine (IFN-gamma) and nitric oxide (NO) levels and reducing Th2 autophagy-restraining cytokines (IL-4 and IL-13) in response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigen. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2010, 10, 694–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Schlee, M.; Harder, J.; Koten, B.; Wehkamp, J.; Fellermann, K. Probiotic lactobacilli and VSL#3 induce enterocyte beta-defensin 2. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2008, 151, 528–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Schlee, M.; Wehkamp, J.; Altenhoefer, A.; Stange, E.F.; Fellermann, K. Induction of human beta-defensin 2 by the probiotic Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 is mediated through flagellin. Infect. Immun. 2007, 75, 2399–2407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Salzman, N.H.; Hung, K.; Haribhai, D.; Chu, H.; Karlsson-Sjöberg, J.; Amir, E.; Teggatz, P.; Barman, M.; Hayward, M.; Eastwood, D.; et al. Enteric defensins are essential regulators of intestinal microbial ecology. Nat. Immunol. 2010, 11, 76–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Gong, J.; Xu, J.; Zhu, W.; Gao, X.; Li, N.; Li, J. Epithelial-specific blockade of MyD88-dependent pathway causes spontaneous small intestinal inflammation. Clin. Immunol. 2010, 136, 245–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kong, J.; Zhang, Z.; Musch, M.W.; Ning, G.; Sun, J.; Hart, J.; Bissonnette, M.; Li, Y.C. Novel role of the vitamin D receptor in maintaining the integrity of the intestinal mucosal barrier. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2008, 294, G208–G216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Froicu, M.; Cantorna, M.T. Vitamin D and the vitamin D receptor are critical for control of the innate immune response to colonic injury. BMC Immunol. 2007, 8, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Cross, H.S.; Nittke, T.; Kallay, E. Colonic vitamin D metabolism: Implications for the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease and colorectal cancer. Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 2011, 347, 70–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yoon, S.S.; Sun, J. Probiotics, nuclear receptor signaling, and anti-inflammatory pathways. Gastroenterol. Res. Pract. 2011, 2011, 971938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Wu, S.; Liao, A.P.; Xia, Y.; Li, Y.C.; Li, J.D.; Sartor, R.B.; Sun, J. Vitamin D receptor negatively regulates bacterial-stimulated NF-kappaB activity in intestine. Am. J. Pathol. 2010, 177, 686–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Wu, S.; Yoon, S.; Zhang, Y.G.; Lu, R.; Xia, Y.; Wan, J.; Petrof, E.O.; Claud, E.C.; Chen, D.; Sun, J. Vitamin D receptor pathway is required for probiotic protection in colitis. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2015, 309, G341–G349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Combination of probiotics and active 1, 25 D3 attenuates the severity of Salmonella colitis in mice. We orally infected 6−8 week-old female C57BL/6 mice with 108 CFU of SL1344 (S.Tm). Before and after infection, mice were gavaged with vehicle control (5% dimethyl sulfoxide), 1,25 D3 (VD), Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) or Bifidobacterium longum (BL), daily as shown above. Loss of body weight (A) and scores of diarrhea situation (B) in mice were recoded daily. Cecum was resected and fixed in formaldehyde, and sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin stain. (C) Representative histological images (× 20 and × 50 magnification) of cecum from the different experimental groups. (D) The pathological scores for colitis at the cecum of mice. The data shown are means ± SEM (n = 6 mice/group). ** p < 0.01.
Figure 1. Combination of probiotics and active 1, 25 D3 attenuates the severity of Salmonella colitis in mice. We orally infected 6−8 week-old female C57BL/6 mice with 108 CFU of SL1344 (S.Tm). Before and after infection, mice were gavaged with vehicle control (5% dimethyl sulfoxide), 1,25 D3 (VD), Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) or Bifidobacterium longum (BL), daily as shown above. Loss of body weight (A) and scores of diarrhea situation (B) in mice were recoded daily. Cecum was resected and fixed in formaldehyde, and sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin stain. (C) Representative histological images (× 20 and × 50 magnification) of cecum from the different experimental groups. (D) The pathological scores for colitis at the cecum of mice. The data shown are means ± SEM (n = 6 mice/group). ** p < 0.01.
Microorganisms 09 01804 g001aMicroorganisms 09 01804 g001b
Figure 2. The immunoregulatory effects of combined 1,25D3 and Bifidobacterium Longum on cecal cytokines and antimicrobial peptide in Salmonella colitis mice. Before and after infection, mice were gavaged with vehicle control (5% dimethyl sulfoxide), 1,25D3 (VD), Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) or Bifidobacterium longum (BL), or combination of VD and BL (VD+BL) or LGG (VD + LGG). At the end of the experiment, total RNA was extracted from the cecal tissues. mIL-6 mIL-8, mIL-1β, mTNF-α, mBD-3 and VDR mRNA expressions were analyzed using real-time quantitative PCR. Values were measured as fold increase compared to the level of control group. The data shown are means ± the SEM (n = 6 mice/group). An asterisk indicates the significant differences compared to Salmonella infection only group, based on one-way ANOVA. * p < 0.05, ** p< 0.01.
Figure 2. The immunoregulatory effects of combined 1,25D3 and Bifidobacterium Longum on cecal cytokines and antimicrobial peptide in Salmonella colitis mice. Before and after infection, mice were gavaged with vehicle control (5% dimethyl sulfoxide), 1,25D3 (VD), Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) or Bifidobacterium longum (BL), or combination of VD and BL (VD+BL) or LGG (VD + LGG). At the end of the experiment, total RNA was extracted from the cecal tissues. mIL-6 mIL-8, mIL-1β, mTNF-α, mBD-3 and VDR mRNA expressions were analyzed using real-time quantitative PCR. Values were measured as fold increase compared to the level of control group. The data shown are means ± the SEM (n = 6 mice/group). An asterisk indicates the significant differences compared to Salmonella infection only group, based on one-way ANOVA. * p < 0.05, ** p< 0.01.
Microorganisms 09 01804 g002
Figure 3. Combination of probiotics and active 1,25D3 attenuate systemic translocation of Salmonella. We infected 6–8 week-old female C57BL/6 mice with streptomycin, and incubated them with 108 CPU of S. typhimurium (SL1344 strain) for 48 h, along with vehicle, 1,25D3 or probiotics, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) or Bifidobacterium longum (BL), daily as shown above. Numbers of bacteria translocated to liver or spleen were measured from liver (A) or spleen (B) homogenates of infected and/or treated mice. The data shown are represented as the means ± the SEM of the bacterial load in the liver and spleen (n = 6). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Figure 3. Combination of probiotics and active 1,25D3 attenuate systemic translocation of Salmonella. We infected 6–8 week-old female C57BL/6 mice with streptomycin, and incubated them with 108 CPU of S. typhimurium (SL1344 strain) for 48 h, along with vehicle, 1,25D3 or probiotics, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) or Bifidobacterium longum (BL), daily as shown above. Numbers of bacteria translocated to liver or spleen were measured from liver (A) or spleen (B) homogenates of infected and/or treated mice. The data shown are represented as the means ± the SEM of the bacterial load in the liver and spleen (n = 6). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Microorganisms 09 01804 g003
Figure 4. The synergistic effects of active vitamin D and Bifidobacterium longum on VDR mRNA expression in Salmonella-infected SW480 cells. SW480 cells were uninfected (CON) or infected by S. typhimurium wild-type strain SL1344 (SL) in a constant concentration, with and without treatment of Bifidobacterium longum (BL), 1,25D3 (VD) or combination of both (VD+BL). Transfection of SW480 cells with VDR siRNA (si) was performed to knockdown VDR Total RNA extracted from SW480 cells was prepared for analyzing the levels of VDR mRNA by real-time quantitative PCR. The results of mRNA levels were depicted as means ± SEM of at least three independent experiments. *** p < 0.001.
Figure 4. The synergistic effects of active vitamin D and Bifidobacterium longum on VDR mRNA expression in Salmonella-infected SW480 cells. SW480 cells were uninfected (CON) or infected by S. typhimurium wild-type strain SL1344 (SL) in a constant concentration, with and without treatment of Bifidobacterium longum (BL), 1,25D3 (VD) or combination of both (VD+BL). Transfection of SW480 cells with VDR siRNA (si) was performed to knockdown VDR Total RNA extracted from SW480 cells was prepared for analyzing the levels of VDR mRNA by real-time quantitative PCR. The results of mRNA levels were depicted as means ± SEM of at least three independent experiments. *** p < 0.001.
Microorganisms 09 01804 g004
Figure 5. Involvement of VDR in synergistic effects of combined Bifidobacterium longum and active vitamin D3 on Salmonella-induced IL-8, IL-1β, TNF-α and hBD-2 mRNA expression in SW480 cells. Transfection of SW480 cells with VDR siRNA (si) was performed to knockdown VDR. Transfected SW480 cells were uninfected (CON) or infected by S. typhimurium wild-type strain SL1344 (SL) in a constant concentration, in the absence or presence of Bifidobacterium longum (BL), 1,25D3 (VD) or combination of both (VD+BL). Total RNA was extracted, reverse transcribed and real-time quantitative PCR was performed to estimate amounts of IL-6, IL-8, IL-1β, TNF-αand hBD-2transcript in Salmonella-infected cultured cells. Relative quantification based on internal reference gene (GAPDH transcript) to determine fold-differences in expression of the target genes, IL-8, IL-1β, TNF-α and hBD-2 mRNA, are measured and the fold increase over uninfected control cells is shown. Results are represented as mean ± SEM for at least three determinations from independent experiments. An asterisk indicates a significant difference (* p < 0.05, ** p< 0.01, *** p < 0.001, ns: not significant).
Figure 5. Involvement of VDR in synergistic effects of combined Bifidobacterium longum and active vitamin D3 on Salmonella-induced IL-8, IL-1β, TNF-α and hBD-2 mRNA expression in SW480 cells. Transfection of SW480 cells with VDR siRNA (si) was performed to knockdown VDR. Transfected SW480 cells were uninfected (CON) or infected by S. typhimurium wild-type strain SL1344 (SL) in a constant concentration, in the absence or presence of Bifidobacterium longum (BL), 1,25D3 (VD) or combination of both (VD+BL). Total RNA was extracted, reverse transcribed and real-time quantitative PCR was performed to estimate amounts of IL-6, IL-8, IL-1β, TNF-αand hBD-2transcript in Salmonella-infected cultured cells. Relative quantification based on internal reference gene (GAPDH transcript) to determine fold-differences in expression of the target genes, IL-8, IL-1β, TNF-α and hBD-2 mRNA, are measured and the fold increase over uninfected control cells is shown. Results are represented as mean ± SEM for at least three determinations from independent experiments. An asterisk indicates a significant difference (* p < 0.05, ** p< 0.01, *** p < 0.001, ns: not significant).
Microorganisms 09 01804 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Huang, F.-C.; Huang, S.-C. The Cooperation of Bifidobacterium longum and Active Vitamin D3 on Innate Immunity in Salmonella Colitis Mice via Vitamin D Receptor. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1804. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9091804

AMA Style

Huang F-C, Huang S-C. The Cooperation of Bifidobacterium longum and Active Vitamin D3 on Innate Immunity in Salmonella Colitis Mice via Vitamin D Receptor. Microorganisms. 2021; 9(9):1804. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9091804

Chicago/Turabian Style

Huang, Fu-Chen, and Shun-Chen Huang. 2021. "The Cooperation of Bifidobacterium longum and Active Vitamin D3 on Innate Immunity in Salmonella Colitis Mice via Vitamin D Receptor" Microorganisms 9, no. 9: 1804. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9091804

APA Style

Huang, F.-C., & Huang, S.-C. (2021). The Cooperation of Bifidobacterium longum and Active Vitamin D3 on Innate Immunity in Salmonella Colitis Mice via Vitamin D Receptor. Microorganisms, 9(9), 1804. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9091804

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop